Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

PTEN Is Involved in Sunitinib and Sorafenib Resistance in Renal Cell Carcinoma

YOHEI SEKINO, TAKESHI HAGURA, XIANGRUI HAN, TAKASHI BABASAKI, KEISUKE GOTO, SHOGO INOUE, TETSUTARO HAYASHI, JUN TEISHIMA, MASANOBU SHIGETA, DAIKI TANIYAMA, KAZUYA KURAOKA, KAZUHIRO SENTANI, WATARU YASUI and AKIO MATSUBARA
Anticancer Research April 2020, 40 (4) 1943-1951; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14149
YOHEI SEKINO
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: akikosekino{at}gmail.com
TAKESHI HAGURA
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
XIANGRUI HAN
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI BABASAKI
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
2Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEISUKE GOTO
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOGO INOUE
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TETSUTARO HAYASHI
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUN TEISHIMA
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASANOBU SHIGETA
3Department of Diagnostic Pathology, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAIKI TANIYAMA
2Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUYA KURAOKA
4Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization, Kure Medical Center and Chugoku Cancer Center, Kure, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUHIRO SENTANI
2Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WATARU YASUI
2Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIO MATSUBARA
1Department of Urology, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Targeted receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) is a standard treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, the role of PTEN in TKI resistance remains poorly understood. We aimed to determine the functional role of PTEN knockout and analyse the predictive significance of PTEN expression for TKI treatment in RCC. Materials and Methods: We developed PTEN knockout cells in RCC cell lines using the CRISPR-Cas9 system and analysed the effect of PTEN knockout on spheroid formation and resistance to sunitinib and sorafenib. Results: PTEN knockout promoted spheroid formation and decreased sunitinib/sorafenib sensitivity in RCC cell lines. PTEN immunohistochemistry in 74 metastatic RCCs treated with sunitinib and sorafenib revealed negative PTEN expression in 23% of samples. Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a significant association of negative PTEN expression with poor progression-free survival in metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib and sorafenib (p=0.024) or sunitinib alone (p=0.009). Conclusion: PTEN may be a biomarker and therapeutic target in patients with metastatic RCC.

  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • PTEN
  • spheroid
  • sunitinib
  • sorafenib

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for around 90% of all renal tumours, and its incidence has been steadily increasing by 2-4% each year (1). More than 30% of patients diagnosed with RCC have metastatic disease (2). Patients with metastatic RCC have an approximately 13 months' median survival and a 5-year survival rate under 10% (3). Sunitinib is an oral multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which has potent anti-angiogenic effects and direct anti-tumour activities due to the inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, and stem cell growth factor receptor (4). Sunitinib treatment is used as a first-line therapy for metastatic RCC (5, 6) and significantly prolongs overall survival in metastatic RCC (7). Although approximately 70% of the patients show an initial response to sunitinib, eventually, sunitinib resistance and disease progression occur. Recent evidence has shown that the mechanisms of sunitinib resistance may be multifactorial (8-10); however, the mechanisms that underpin sunitinib resistance are not fully elucidated. Therefore, there is an urgent need to clarify the mechanisms of sunitinib resistance.

Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog Deleted from Chromosome 10 (PTEN) is a tumour-suppressive protein (11). The PTEN gene has both recurrent point mutations and focal deletions in RCC (12, 13). PTEN has been reported to antagonize the phosphoinositol-3-kinase (PI3K)/PTEN/AKT signalling pathway, which plays a crucial role in cell growth, differentiation, survival and drug resistance in RCC (14, 15). The Cancer Genome Atlas data showed that bi-allelic loss of PTEN is rare and associated with poor overall survival in RCC (16, 17). Although some studies have reported the prognostic significance of PTEN for TKI treatment (18, 19), the role of PTEN in sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC has not been fully elucidated.

In this study, we aimed to analyse the effect of PTEN knockout on sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC cell lines. We also analysed the expression of PTEN using immunohistochemistry, in specimens obtained from metastatic RCC patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines. Human RCC-derived cell lines Caki-1, ACHN, OSRC-2 and 786-O were purchased from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources Cell Bank (Osaka, Japan). All cell lines were maintained in RPMI 1640 (Nissui Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (Whittaker, Walkersville, MD, USA) in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C.

Western blot analysis. For western blot analysis, cells were lysed as described previously (20). Primary antibodies against PTEN, Akt, and p-Akt (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) were used. β-Actin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as a loading control. The IDs and dilutions of the primary and secondary antibodies used are summarized in Table I.

Generation of PTEN knockout cells. The CRISPR-Cas9 technology via the lentiviral transfection approach was used to knockout PTEN in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells. PTEN single-guide RNAs (PTEN-CRISPR vector) or scrambled single-guide RNAs (empty vector), and CRISPR/Cas9 All-in-One lentivector pLenti-U6-sgRNA-SFFV-Cas9-2A-Puro were purchased from ABM Inc. (Richmond, BC, Canada). The sgRNA sequence of the PTEN-CRISPR vector was TGGGAATAGTTACTCCC. Lentiviral particles were generated by co-transfection of HEK293T cells with Cas9-sgRNA constructs and packaging plasmids (GAG, VSVG, REV). After 48 h, the conditioned media containing lentiviral particles were harvested and used to infect Caki-1 cells using polybrene as the transfection agent. Stable PTEN knockout ACHN and OSRC-2 cells were selected by passaging in media containing 4 μg/ml puromycin.

Spheroid formation assay. For the generation of spheres, 2×103 cells (transfected with TUBB3 siRNA, or negative control siRNA) were plated on 24-well ultra-low attachment plates (Corning, New York, NY, USA). Cells were grown in mTeSR medium (STEMCELL Technologies Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA). The plates were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator for 15 days. Sphere size was then determined using a microscope.

Sunitinib and sorafenib treatment. Sunitinib maleate and sorafenib tosylate were obtained from Funakoshi (Tokyo, Japan) and handled according to the manufacturer's recommendations. Cell lines were treated with vehicle (0.5% ethanol) or escalating doses of sunitinib and sorafenib. An MTT assay to assess cell viability was performed after the cells had been exposed to sunitinib and sorafenib treatment for 48 h. Drug sensitivity curves and IC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism 4.0 software (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) (21).

Tissue samples. We used 74 metastatic RCC tissue samples (Table II) for immunohistochemistry. The samples were collected from patients at the Hiroshima University Hospital, Kure Medical Center, and Chugoku Cancer Center under an institutional review board-approved protocol (IRB# E912, 2019-08). Written comprehensive approvals for basic or clinical research were obtained from all of the patients whose samples were used. This study was conducted in accordance with the Ethical Guidance for Human Genome/Gene Research of the Japanese Government.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

ID and dilution of primary and secondary antibody.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Patient characteristics.

Immunohistochemistry. Immunohistochemistry was performed as described previously (22). Sections were incubated with a rabbit polyclonal anti-PTEN antibody (1:100) (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc.) for 1 h at room temperature. Cytoplasmic PTEN positivity and negativity in the tumour samples were recorded. Tumour samples with high PTEN intensity were considered positive, whereas no expression of the protein was considered negative (23). Two pathologists (DT and KS), without knowledge of the patients' clinical and pathologic parameters or their outcomes, independently reviewed immunoreactivity in each specimen.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Generation of PTEN knockout cells in RCC cell lines. (A) Western blot analysis of PTEN and β-actin in ACHN, 786-O, and OSRC-2 cells. β-actin was used as a loading control. (B, C) Western blot analysis of PTEN, Akt, p-Akt, and β-actin in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells transfected with PTEN-CRISPR vector or empty vector. β-actin was used as a loading control.

Statistical analysis. All experiments were repeated at least three times with each sample in triplicate. The results are expressed as the mean±S.D. of the triplicate measurements. Sample sizes for relevant experiments were determined by power analysis. Statistical differences were evaluated using the two-tailed Student t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed, and the log-rank Mantel-Cox test was used to determine any statistical difference between the survival curves of the cohorts. Statistical analyses were conducted primarily using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad Software Inc., CA, USA).

Results

Generation of PTEN knockout RCC cell lines. Previously, we generated PTEN knockout cells by using the PTEN-CRISPR vector in Caki-1 cells (24). Additionally, we generated PTEN knockout cells in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells, which are well established RCC cell lines (25, 26). An initial western blotting experiment performed before the knockout experiment showed that PTEN expression was detected in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells but not in 786-O cells (Figure 1A). Western blotting after transfection with the PTEN-CRISPR vector confirmed he loss of PTEN expression in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells, while the expression of phosphorylated AKT was upregulated (Figure 1B, C).

Knockout of PTEN promotes spheroid formation in RCC. Recent studies have shown that PTEN deletion induces spheroid formation in ovarian and colorectal cancer (27, 28). Therefore, we analysed the effect of PTEN knockout on spheroid formation in Caki-1, ACHN, and OSRC-2 cells. Caki-1 cells did not form spheroids. The size of the spheroids was larger in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells transfected with the PTEN-CRISPR vector than in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells transfected with the empty vector (Figure 2A, B).

Knockout of PTEN promoted sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC. Some studies have shown that spheroid formation induces drug resistance (29, 30), and recent papers have indicated that sunitinib is more toxic to cells cultured in monolayers than in three-dimensional spheroids (31, 32). Therefore, to examine the effect of PTEN knockout on sunitinib and sorafenib resistance, we performed MTT assays to measure cell viability under various concentrations of sunitinib and sorafenib in Caki-1, ACHN, and OSRC-2 cells transfected with the empty vector or the PTEN-CRISPR vector. Previously, we have shown that knockout of PTEN promoted sunitinib resistance in Caki-1 cells (24). Knockout of PTEN decreased the sensitivity of ACHN and OSRC-2 cells to sunitinib (Figure 3A, B) and the sensitivity of all three cell types to sorafenib (Figure 3C-E).

Impact of PTEN on response of sunitinib and sorafenib treatment in metastatic RCC. We analysed the association between PTEN expression and therapeutic outcomes in 74 metastatic RCCs treated with sunitinib and sorafenib as first-line treatment. Negative PTEN expression was found in 17 of 74 (23%) metastatic RCC patients (Figure 4A). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant association between negative PTEN expression and poor progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib and sorafenib as first-line treatment (p=0.024) (Figure 4B). We also analysed the PFS data in patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib separately. In the sunitinib group, negative PTEN expression was significantly associated with poor PFS (p=0.009) (Figure 4C), whereas in the sorafenib group, negative PTEN expression was not significantly associated with poor PFS (p=0.744).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

PTEN knockout promoted spheroid formation in RCC cell lines. (A, B) The size of the spheres formed in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells transfected with PTEN-CRISPR vector or empty vector. Bars and error bars indicate the mean and S.D., respectively, of three independent experiments. Representative images of spheroid formation in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells. *p<0.01.

Discussion

PTEN has been reported to antagonize the PI3K/PTEN/AKT signalling pathway, which plays a crucial role in cell growth, differentiation, survival, and drug resistance in RCC (11, 33). Recent evidence has indicated that PTEN overexpression overcomes sunitinib resistance in RCC cell lines (34). We have previously shown that PTEN is involved in sunitinib resistance in Caki-1 cells (24). In the present study, loss of PTEN promoted sunitinib resistance in ACHN and OSRC-2 cells. Several reports have shown that PTEN is involved in sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma (35, 36). However, the role of PTEN in sorafenib resistance in RCC is not well understood. In the present study, the loss of PTEN promoted sorafenib resistance in RCC cell lines. Collectively, these results indicated that PTEN may be involved in sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC. Some preclinical studies have shown that PI3K inhibitors overcome sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC (34, 37). Although further studies are necessary, the targeting of PTEN may be a promising strategy to overcome sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The effect of PTEN knockout on sunitinib and sorafenib sensitivity in RCC cell lines. (A, B) The dose-dependent effects of sunitinib on the viability of ACHN and OSRC-2 cells transfected with PTEN-CRISPR vector or empty vector. Bars and error bars indicate the mean and S.D., respectively, of 3 independent experiments. *p<0.01. (C, D, E) The dose-dependent effects of sorafenib on the viability of ACHN, OSRC-2, and Caki-1 cells. Bars and error bars indicate the mean and S.D., respectively, of three independent experiments. *p<0.01.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

The expression of PTEN in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) treated with sunitinib and sorafenib. Immunohistochemical staining of PTEN in the non-neoplastic kidney and RCC. Left panel: Original magnification, 100×. Right panel: Original magnification, 400×. (B) A Kaplan–Meier plot of progression-free survival (PFS) in metastatic RCC patients treated with sunitinib and sorafenib (C) A Kaplan–Meier plot of PFS in metastatic RCC patients treated with sunitinib (D) A Kaplan–Meier plot of PFS in metastatic RCC patients treated with sorafenib.

A number of reports have used sequencing and immunohistochemistry to identify the predictive biomarkers for TKI treatment (38-40). So far, however, no biomarker has been firmly established. A recent study has reported that negative expression of PTEN, determined by immunocytochemistry, tended to correlate with poor PFS of patients treated with sunitinib (18). In the present study, immunohistochemistry showed that negative PTEN expression was associated with poor PFS in metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib. Meanwhile, a recent clinical trial (RECORD-3 trial) has shown that negative PTEN expression by immunohisto-chemistry was not associated with therapeutic outcomes sunitinib treatment (41). These results suggest that the predictive value of PTEN-regarding the response to sunitinib treatment is controversial. A recent study showed that the immunohistochemical evaluation of PTEN has not been sufficiently standardized (42). In our study, negative PTEN expression was observed in 23% of metastatic RCC patients. On the other hand, in the RECORD-3 clinical trial, negative PTEN expression was found in 53% of metastatic RCC patients. In addition, recent studies have shown that racial differences may contribute to the diversity of genomic aberrations including PTEN (43, 44). These findings help to explain why the predictive value of PTEN in sunitinib treatment is controversial. However, further studies are necessary to identify the predictive value of PTEN.

This study has some limitations. First, although we showed that negative PTEN expression was associated with sunitinib response in RCC, we used a relatively small sample size for immunohistochemical staining of PTEN. A prospective study with a larger number of patients with metastatic RCC will be necessary to verify the present data. Second, we used a CRISPR-Cas9 system to examine the effect of the loss of PTEN in RCC cell lines. To verify the current findings, we will need to analyse the overexpression of PTEN in 786-O cells.

In conclusion, the present study showed that knockout of PTEN induced spheroid formation and promoted sunitinib and sorafenib resistance in RCC cell lines. Immunohistochemistry revealed that negative PTEN expression was correlated with a poor survival outcome of sunitinib treatment. The data presented here emphasize the great potential of PTEN as a biomarker and therapeutic target in patients with metastatic RCC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Mr. Shinichi Norimura for his excellent technical assistance. This work was carried out with the kind cooperation of the Research Center for Molecular Medicine of the Faculty of Medicine of Hiroshima University. We also thank the Analysis Center of Life Science of Hiroshima University for allowing us the use of their facilities.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    YS, AM, and WY designed the study. JT, MS, DT, GK, and AM provided patients' clinical information. YS, HT, XH, and TB performed experiments and acquired data. SI, TH, JT, KS, and KK interpreted the results. YS drafted the manuscript. AM and WY edited the manuscript. All Authors approved the final content for journal submission and publication.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

  • Funding Sources

    This work was supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (19K18586).

  • Received February 11, 2020.
  • Revision received February 25, 2020.
  • Accepted February 27, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hsieh JJ,
    2. Purdue MP,
    3. Signoretti S,
    4. Swanton C,
    5. Albiges L,
    6. Schmidinger M,
    7. Heng DY,
    8. Larkin J,
    9. Ficarra V
    : Renal cell carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers: 17009, 2017. PMID: 28276433. DOI: 10.1038/nrdp.2017.9
  2. ↵
    1. Vera-Badillo FE,
    2. Templeton AJ,
    3. Duran I,
    4. Ocana A,
    5. de Gouveia P,
    6. Aneja P,
    7. Knox JJ,
    8. Tannock IF,
    9. Escudier B,
    10. Amir E
    : Systemic therapy for non-clear cell renal cell carcinomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 67(4): 740-749, 2015. PMID: 24882670. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.05.010
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Janzen NK,
    2. Kim HL,
    3. Figlin RA,
    4. Belldegrun AS
    : Surveillance after radical or partial nephrectomy for localized renal cell carcinoma and management of recurrent disease. Urol Clin North Am 30(4): 843-852, 2003. PMID:14680319. DOI: 10.1016/s0094-0143(03)00056-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Qu L,
    2. Ding J,
    3. Chen C,
    4. Wu ZJ,
    5. Liu B,
    6. Gao Y,
    7. Chen W,
    8. Liu F,
    9. Sun W,
    10. Li XF,
    11. Wang X,
    12. Wang Y,
    13. Xu ZY,
    14. Gao L,
    15. Yang Q,
    16. Xu B,
    17. Li YM,
    18. Fang ZY,
    19. Xu ZP,
    20. Bao Y,
    21. Wu DS,
    22. Miao X,
    23. Sun HY,
    24. Sun YH,
    25. Wang HY,
    26. Wang LH
    : Exosome-transmitted lncarsr promotes sunitinib resistance in renal cancer by acting as a competing endogenous rna. Cancer Cell 29(5): 653-668, 2016. PMID: 27117758. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Atkins MB,
    2. Tannir NM
    : Current and emerging therapies for first-line treatment of metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev 70: 127-137, 2018. PMID: 30173085. DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2018.07.009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Vuorinen RL,
    2. Paunu N,
    3. Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T,
    4. Reunamo T,
    5. Jekunen A,
    6. Kataja V,
    7. Sintonen H,
    8. Purmonen T,
    9. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
    : Sunitinib first-line treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Costs and effects. Anticancer Res 39(10): 5559-5564, 2019. PMID: 31570450. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Motzer RJ,
    2. Hutson TE,
    3. Tomczak P,
    4. Michaelson MD,
    5. Bukowski RM,
    6. Rixe O,
    7. Oudard S,
    8. Negrier S,
    9. Szczylik C,
    10. Kim ST,
    11. Chen I,
    12. Bycott PW,
    13. Baum CM,
    14. Figlin RA
    : Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 356(2): 115-124, 2007. PMID: 17215529. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa065044
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Morais C
    : Sunitinib resistance in renal cell carcinoma. J Kidney Cancer VHL 1(1): 1-11, 2014. PMID: 28326244. DOI: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2014.7
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rini BI,
    2. Atkins MB
    : Resistance to targeted therapy in renal-cell carcinoma. Lancet Oncol 10(10): 992-1000, 2009. PMID: 19796751. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70240-2
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi N,
    2. Osaki M,
    3. Onuma K,
    4. Yumioka T,
    5. Iwamoto H,
    6. Sejima T,
    7. Kugoh H,
    8. Takenaka A,
    9. Okada F
    : Identification of micrornas involved in resistance to sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma cells. Anticancer Res 37(6): 2985-2992, 2017. PMID: 28551636. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11652
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Lee YR,
    2. Chen M,
    3. Pandolfi PP
    : The functions and regulation of the pten tumour suppressor: New modes and prospects. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 19(9): 547-562, 2018. PMID: 29858604. DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0015-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Mitchell TJ,
    2. Rossi SH,
    3. Klatte T,
    4. Stewart GD
    : Genomics and clinical correlates of renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 36(12): 1899-1911, 2018. PMID: 30099580. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2429-x
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Alimov A,
    2. Li C,
    3. Gizatullin R,
    4. Fredriksson V,
    5. Sundelin B,
    6. Klein G,
    7. Zabarovsky E,
    8. Bergerheim U
    : Somatic mutation and homozygous deletion of pten/mmac1 gene of 10q23 in renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 19(5B): 3841-3846, 1999. PMID: 10628321.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fan C,
    2. Zhao C,
    3. Wang F,
    4. Li S,
    5. Wang J
    : Significance of pten mutation in cellular process, prognosis, and drug selection in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Front Oncol 9: 357, 2019. PMID: 31139560. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00357
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Tang L,
    2. Li X,
    3. Gao Y,
    4. Chen L,
    5. Gu L,
    6. Chen J,
    7. Lyu X,
    8. Zhang Y,
    9. Zhang X
    : Phosphatase and tensin homolog (pten) expression on oncologic outcome in renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 12(7): e0179437, 2017. PMID: 28672019. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Lee HJ,
    2. Lee HY,
    3. Lee JH,
    4. Lee H,
    5. Kang G,
    6. Song JS,
    7. Kang J,
    8. Kim JH
    : Prognostic significance of biallelic loss of pten in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 192(3): 940-946, 2014. PMID: 24704020. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2014.03.097
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ricketts CJ,
    2. De Cubas AA,
    3. Fan H,
    4. Smith CC,
    5. Lang M,
    6. Reznik E,
    7. Bowlby R,
    8. Gibb EA,
    9. Akbani R,
    10. Beroukhim R,
    11. Bottaro DP,
    12. Choueiri TK,
    13. Gibbs RA,
    14. Godwin AK,
    15. Haake S,
    16. Hakimi AA,
    17. Henske EP,
    18. Hsieh JJ,
    19. Ho TH,
    20. Kanchi RS,
    21. Krishnan B,
    22. Kwiatkowski DJ,
    23. Lui W,
    24. Merino MJ,
    25. Mills GB,
    26. Myers J,
    27. Nickerson ML,
    28. Reuter VE,
    29. Schmidt LS,
    30. Shelley CS,
    31. Shen H,
    32. Shuch B,
    33. Signoretti S,
    34. Srinivasan R,
    35. Tamboli P,
    36. Thomas G,
    37. Vincent BG,
    38. Vocke CD,
    39. Wheeler DA,
    40. Yang L,
    41. Kim WY,
    42. Robertson AG,
    43. Cancer Genome Atlas Research N,
    44. Spellman PT,
    45. Rathmell WK,
    46. Linehan WM
    : The cancer genome atlas comprehensive molecular characterization of renal cell carcinoma. Cell Rep 23(1): 313-326 e315, 2018. PMID: 29617669. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Muriel Lopez C,
    2. Esteban E,
    3. Berros JP,
    4. Pardo P,
    5. Astudillo A,
    6. Izquierdo M,
    7. Crespo G,
    8. Sanmamed M,
    9. Fonseca PJ,
    10. Martinez-Camblor P
    : Prognostic factors in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 10(4): 262-270, 2012. PMID: 22959659. DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2012.06.005
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Park I,
    2. Cho YM,
    3. Lee JL,
    4. Ahn JH,
    5. Lee DH
    : Prognostic tissue biomarker exploration for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving vascular endothelial growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Tumour Biol 37(4): 4919-4927, 2016. PMID: 26526582. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-015-4339-5
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Oue N,
    2. Hamai Y,
    3. Mitani Y,
    4. Matsumura S,
    5. Oshimo Y,
    6. Aung PP,
    7. Kuraoka K,
    8. Nakayama H,
    9. Yasui W
    : Gene expression profile of gastric carcinoma: Identification of genes and tags potentially involved in invasion, metastasis, and carcinogenesis by serial analysis of gene expression. Cancer Res 64(7): 2397-2405, 2004. PMID: 15059891. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3514
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Sekino Y,
    2. Oue N,
    3. Shigematsu Y,
    4. Ishikawa A,
    5. Sakamoto N,
    6. Sentani K,
    7. Teishima J,
    8. Matsubara A,
    9. Yasui W
    : Kifc1 induces resistance to docetaxel and is associated with survival of patients with prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 35(1): 31 e13-31 e20, 2017. PMID: 27665358. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.007
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Sekino Y,
    2. Oue N,
    3. Mukai S,
    4. Shigematsu Y,
    5. Goto K,
    6. Sakamoto N,
    7. Sentani K,
    8. Hayashi T,
    9. Teishima J,
    10. Matsubara A,
    11. Yasui W
    : Protocadherin b9 promotes resistance to bicalutamide and is associated with the survival of prostate cancer patients. Prostate, 2018. PMID: 27665358. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.08.007
  22. ↵
    1. Hager M,
    2. Haufe H,
    3. Kemmerling R,
    4. Mikuz G,
    5. Kolbitsch C,
    6. Moser PL
    : Pten expression in renal cell carcinoma and oncocytoma and prognosis. Pathology 39(5): 482-485, 2007. PMID: 17886097. DOI: 10.1080/00313020701570012
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Sekino Y,
    2. Sakamoto N,
    3. Sentani K,
    4. Oue N,
    5. Teishima J,
    6. Matsubara A,
    7. Yasui W
    : Mir-130b promotes sunitinib resistance through regulation of pten in renal cell carcinoma. Oncology 97(3): 164-172, 2019. PMID: 31195398. DOI: 10.1159/000500605
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Brodaczewska KK,
    2. Szczylik C,
    3. Fiedorowicz M,
    4. Porta C,
    5. Czarnecka AM
    : Choosing the right cell line for renal cell cancer research. Mol Cancer 15(1): 83, 2016. PMID: 27993170. DOI: 10.1186/s12943-016-0565-8
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kinouchi T,
    2. Kotake T,
    3. Mori Y,
    4. Abe T
    : Human renal cell carcinoma: Establishment and characterization of a new cell line (os-rc-2). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 21(4): 195-199, 1985. PMID: 4008433. DOI: 10.1007/bf02620929
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Dean M,
    2. Jin V,
    3. Bergsten TM,
    4. Austin JR,
    5. Lantvit DD,
    6. Russo A,
    7. Burdette JE
    : Loss of pten in fallopian tube epithelium results in multicellular tumor spheroid formation and metastasis to the ovary. Cancers (Basel) 11(6), 2019. PMID: 31242614. DOI: 10.3390/cancers11060884
  27. ↵
    1. Chandrasekaran S,
    2. Deng H,
    3. Fang Y
    : Pten deletion potentiates invasion of colorectal cancer spheroidal cells through 3d matrigel. Integr Biol (Camb) 7(3): 324-334, 2015. PMID: 25625883. DOI: 10.1039/c4ib00298a
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Langhans SA
    : Three-dimensional in vitro cell culture models in drug discovery and drug repositioning. Front Pharmacol 9: 6, 2018. PMID: 29410625. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2018.00006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Khawar IA,
    2. Park JK,
    3. Jung ES,
    4. Lee MA,
    5. Chang S,
    6. Kuh HJ
    : Three dimensional mixed-cell spheroids mimic stroma-mediated chemoresistance and invasive migration in hepatocellular carcinoma. Neoplasia 20(8): 800-812, 2018. PMID: 2998150. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.05.008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lichner Z,
    2. Saleeb R,
    3. Butz H,
    4. Ding Q,
    5. Nofech-Mozes R,
    6. Riad S,
    7. Farag M,
    8. Varkouhi AK,
    9. Dos Santos CC,
    10. Kapus A,
    11. Yousef GM
    : Sunitinib induces early histomolecular changes in a subset of renal cancer cells that contribute to resistance. FASEB J 33(1): 1347-1359, 2019. PMID: 30148679. DOI: 10.1096/fj.201800596R
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Brodaczewska KK,
    2. Bielecka ZF,
    3. Maliszewska-Olejniczak K,
    4. Szczylik C,
    5. Porta C,
    6. Bartnik E,
    7. Czarnecka AM
    : Metastatic renal cell carcinoma cells growing in 3d on polydlysine or laminin present a stemlike phenotype and drug resistance. Oncol Rep 42(5): 1878-1892, 2019. PMID: 31545459. DOI: 10.3892/or.2019.7321
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Hafsi S,
    2. Pezzino FM,
    3. Candido S,
    4. Ligresti G,
    5. Spandidos DA,
    6. Soua Z,
    7. McCubrey JA,
    8. Travali S,
    9. Libra M
    : Gene alterations in the pi3k/pten/akt pathway as a mechanism of drug-resistance (review). Int J Oncol 40(3): 639-644, 2012. PMID: 22200790. DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2011.1312
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Makhov PB,
    2. Golovine K,
    3. Kutikov A,
    4. Teper E,
    5. Canter DJ,
    6. Simhan J,
    7. Uzzo RG,
    8. Kolenko VM
    : Modulation of akt/mtor signaling overcomes sunitinib resistance in renal and prostate cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther 11(7): 1510-1517, 2012. PMID: 22532600. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0907
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Ruan ZP,
    2. Xu R,
    3. Lv Y,
    4. Tian T,
    5. Wang WJ,
    6. Guo H,
    7. Nan KJ
    : Pten enhances the sensitivity of human hepatocellular carcinoma cells to sorafenib. Oncol Res 20(2-3): 113-121, 2012. PMID: 23193917. DOI: 10.3727/096504012x13477145152995
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Liu K,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Zhang W,
    4. Jia B,
    5. Tan L,
    6. Jin Z,
    7. Liu Y
    : Mir-494 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and increased sorafenib resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting pten. Oncol Rep 34(2): 1003-1010, 2015. PMID: 26045065. DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Roulin D,
    2. Waselle L,
    3. Dormond-Meuwly A,
    4. Dufour M,
    5. Demartines N,
    6. Dormond O
    : Targeting renal cell carcinoma with nvp-bez235, a dual pi3k/mtor inhibitor, in combination with sorafenib. Mol Cancer 10: 90, 2011. PMID: 21791089. DOI: 10.1186/1476-4598-10-90
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Voss MH,
    2. Reising A,
    3. Cheng Y,
    4. Patel P,
    5. Marker M,
    6. Kuo F,
    7. Chan TA,
    8. Choueiri TK,
    9. Hsieh JJ,
    10. Hakimi AA,
    11. Motzer RJ
    : Genomically annotated risk model for advanced renal-cell carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol 19(12): 1688-1698, 2018. PMID: 30416077. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30648-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. D'Aniello C,
    2. Berretta M,
    3. Cavaliere C,
    4. Rossetti S,
    5. Facchini BA,
    6. Iovane G,
    7. Mollo G,
    8. Capasso M,
    9. Pepa CD,
    10. Pesce L,
    11. D'Errico D,
    12. Buonerba C,
    13. Di Lorenzo G,
    14. Pisconti S,
    15. De Vita F,
    16. Facchini G
    : Biomarkers of prognosis and efficacy of anti-angiogenic therapy in metastatic clear cell renal cancer. Front Oncol 9: 1400, 2019. PMID: 31921657. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01400
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Stubbs C,
    2. Bardoli AD,
    3. Afshar M,
    4. Pirrie S,
    5. Miscoria M,
    6. Wheeley I,
    7. Porfiri E
    : A study of angiogenesis markers in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing therapy with sunitinib. Anticancer Res 37(1): 253-259, 2017. PMID: 28011500. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11315
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Voss MH,
    2. Chen D,
    3. Reising A,
    4. Marker M,
    5. Shi J,
    6. Xu J,
    7. Ostrovnaya I,
    8. Seshan VE,
    9. Redzematovic A,
    10. Chen YB,
    11. Patel P,
    12. Han X,
    13. Hsieh JJ,
    14. Hakimi AA,
    15. Motzer RJ
    : Pten expression, not mutation status in tsc1, tsc2, or mtor, correlates with the outcome on everolimus in patients with renal cell carcinoma treated on the randomized record-3 trial. Clin Cancer Res 25(2): 506-514, 2019. PMID: 30327302. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-1833
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Agoston EI,
    2. Micsik T,
    3. Acs B,
    4. Fekete K,
    5. Hahn O,
    6. Baranyai Z,
    7. Dede K,
    8. Bodoky G,
    9. Bursics A,
    10. Kulka J,
    11. Krenacs T,
    12. Gyorffy B,
    13. Harsanyi L,
    14. Szasz AM
    : In depth evaluation of the prognostic and predictive utility of pten immunohistochemistry in colorectal carcinomas: Performance of three antibodies with emphasis on intracellular and intratumoral heterogeneity. Diagn Pathol 11(1): 61, 2016. PMID: 27392434. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-016-0508-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Heath EI,
    2. Lynce F,
    3. Xiu J,
    4. Ellerbrock A,
    5. Reddy SK,
    6. Obeid E,
    7. Liu SV,
    8. Bollig-Fischer A,
    9. Separovic D,
    10. Vanderwalde A
    : Racial disparities in the molecular landscape of cancer. Anticancer Res 38(4): 2235-2240, 2018. PMID: 29599344. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12466
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Spratt DE,
    2. Chan T,
    3. Waldron L,
    4. Speers C,
    5. Feng FY,
    6. Ogunwobi OO,
    7. Osborne JR
    : Racial/ethnic disparities in genomic sequencing. JAMA Oncol 2(8): 1070-1074, 2016. PMID: 27366979. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1854
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 4
April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
PTEN Is Involved in Sunitinib and Sorafenib Resistance in Renal Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
PTEN Is Involved in Sunitinib and Sorafenib Resistance in Renal Cell Carcinoma
YOHEI SEKINO, TAKESHI HAGURA, XIANGRUI HAN, TAKASHI BABASAKI, KEISUKE GOTO, SHOGO INOUE, TETSUTARO HAYASHI, JUN TEISHIMA, MASANOBU SHIGETA, DAIKI TANIYAMA, KAZUYA KURAOKA, KAZUHIRO SENTANI, WATARU YASUI, AKIO MATSUBARA
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 1943-1951; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14149

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
PTEN Is Involved in Sunitinib and Sorafenib Resistance in Renal Cell Carcinoma
YOHEI SEKINO, TAKESHI HAGURA, XIANGRUI HAN, TAKASHI BABASAKI, KEISUKE GOTO, SHOGO INOUE, TETSUTARO HAYASHI, JUN TEISHIMA, MASANOBU SHIGETA, DAIKI TANIYAMA, KAZUYA KURAOKA, KAZUHIRO SENTANI, WATARU YASUI, AKIO MATSUBARA
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 1943-1951; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14149
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Development of Acquired Resistance in Alpelisib-treated Gastric Cancer Cells With PIK3CA Mutations and Overcoming Strategies
  • CD44 Is Involved in Sunitinib Resistance and Poor Progression-free Survival After Sunitinib Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • P53 Is Involved in Sunitinib Resistance and Poor Progression-free Survival After Sunitinib Treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Invasive-Front P21 Expression Is Associated With Tumor Aggressiveness in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Isolation and Biological Evaluation of Breast Cancer Side Population Cells Using DyeCycle Violet
  • Serum Extracellular Vesicles Double-positive for CD9 and CD147 or for CD9 and CD63 Decrease After Surgical Resection in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Potential Biomarkers of Residual Tumor
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • Renal cell carcinoma
  • PTEN
  • spheroid
  • sunitinib
  • sorafenib
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire