Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Changes in Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Clinical Significance in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

HYUN LEE, MISEON LEE, JEONG-HAN SEO, GYUNGYUB GONG and HEE JIN LEE
Anticancer Research April 2020, 40 (4) 1883-1890; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14142
HYUN LEE
Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MISEON LEE
Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JEONG-HAN SEO
Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GYUNGYUB GONG
Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HEE JIN LEE
Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: backlila{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can affect tumors and the tumor microenvironment. As changes in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after NAC and the resulting clinical significance have not been clearly defined, we evaluated both in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Materials and Methods: TIL level was histologically analyzed in pre-NAC biopsy and post-NAC operation specimens from 104 TNBC cases with residual invasive carcinoma after NAC. Results: Forty-three cases (41.3%) showed decreases in TIL level, whereas 29 cases (27.9%) showed increases and no significant changes were found in 32 cases (30.8%). A decrease or increase in TIL levels corresponded to a better disease-free survival (DFS) as compared to unchanged levels. In multivariate analysis, a change in TIL level was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. Conclusion: We identified a prognostic significance of TIL changes after NAC. Assessment of TILs before and after NAC can provide valuable prognostic information for TNBC patients.

  • Breast cancer
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is not only the first line therapy for locally advanced breast cancer, but also the current trend for treating early stage breast cancer, especially triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). NAC leads to an increased probability for a breast conserving operation (1). Differences pre- and post-NAC in breast cancer have been actively studied for a variety of systems in the last decade. NAC can change the expression levels of biomarkers such as estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in breast cancer cells, all of which are important for designating breast cancer subtypes with different treatment strategies. Changes in ER, PR, and HER2 after NAC have been reported in a high proportion of cases as follows: ER 12~51%; PR 6~52%; and HER2 5~43% (2). Ki67 labeling can also be altered, and the prognostic significance of pre- or post-NAC alteration in the proliferation index has been studied in various cohorts of breast cancer (3). After NAC, tumors also show discordant mutational profiles and significant gene expression changes (4-7). These changes in cancer cells could be used to develop targeted therapies that can be used downstream of standardized NAC.

NAC can also affect other cell types in the tumor microenvironment, such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). TILs are lymphocytes present in the stroma of a tumor or inside tumor cell nests. TILs are assessed through an eyeball estimation by pathologists or by quantification using digital image analysis in tumor tissue sections with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) or immunohistochemical staining (8, 9). As adoptive TIL therapy and other immunotherapies dealing with immune cells and related molecules are actively being explored as innovative treatment modalities for various tumor types, a better understanding of the immune tumor microenvironment could enhance the success rate of treatments for breast cancer. However, changes in TILs after NAC and the resulting clinical significance have not been clearly defined. We evaluated these changes and assessed the prognostic value of TILs after NAC in TNBC.

Materials and Methods

Patients. TIL level was retrospectively analyzed in a total of 157 TNBC cases using pre-NAC biopsy and post-NAC operation specimens from the Asan Medical Center between 2010 and 2012. NAC regimens were anthracycline/taxane-based. TNBC was defined as ER, PR, and HER-2 negative as confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. In cases of equivocal HER-2 immunohistochemical staining, silver in situ hybridization was performed according to guidelines from the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists (10). Pathologic complete response (pCR) is defined as no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast and lymph node after NAC.

Clinicopathologic information and survival data were obtained from medical records and surgical pathology reports. Exemption from informed consent after de-identification of information was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Asan Medical Center.

Histologic assessment of TIL. Histological TIL level was estimated for entire cases according to previously published methods from the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast Cancer (11). In brief, TILs are determined by the percentage of the area occupied by mononuclear inflammatory cells, including plasma cells, over the total stromal area within the borders of the invasive carcinoma. As the distribution of TILs is usually not even throughout the tumor tissue, it is recommended that average TILs should be assessed, and not to focus on hot spots. Residual cancer burden (RCB) and Miller-Payne grade were also assessed (12, 13).

Statistical analysis. Wilcoxon signed rank analysis, Spearman's correlation, Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, and survival analysis were used for analyzing and comparing variables using SPSS 20.0.0.

Results

Clinicopathologic characteristics. Median age at diagnosis was 41 years. Clinical stage distributions were 7.6% (12 cases), 63.7% (100 cases), 20.4% (32 cases), and 8.3% (13 cases), for cT1, cT2, cT3, and cT4, respectively (Table I). Lymph node metastasis was confirmed in 77.1% (121 cases) by biopsy. Post-NAC RCB classes were 29.3% (46 cases), 4.5% (7 cases), 48.4% (76 cases), and 17.8% (28 cases) for stages 0 (pCR), I, II, and III, respectively (Table II). After NAC, three cases shifted in molecular type. Two cases showed conversion of TNBC to HER-2 positive (ER and PR negative), and one case to ER and PR positive (HER-2 negative). Seven cases showed residual lymph node metastasis without residual invasive carcinoma in the breast. The median follow-up period was 72.3 months.

TILs in pre-NAC. The TIL level in pre-NAC biopsy specimens was 23.3±20.8%. TILs in pre-NAC biopsy specimens were negatively correlated with clinical T stage (Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, p=0.003; Figure 1A). The TIL level of the pre-NAC biopsy specimens with a high histologic grade was significantly higher than that in those with a low histologic grade (grade 3 group, 29.1±20.8%; grade 1 or 2 group 16.1±18.4%; p<0.001, Figure 1B). TIL numbers from pre-NAC pCR cases were significantly higher than those in the non-pathologic complete response (non-pCR) group (pCR group, 30.8±24.9%; non-pCR group, 20.2±18.0%, p=0.017; Figure 1C). Pre-NAC TILs in groups subdivided by RCB class were 30.8±24.9%, 30.7±17.9%, 21.3±18.6%, and 14.7±15.2%, for RCB class 0 (pCR), I, II, and III, respectively. Thus, pre-NAC TILs tended to decrease with increasing RCB class (Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, p<0.001; Figure 1D).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) status.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Clinicopathologic characteristics of post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) status.

TILs in post-NAC. TILs in the 104 non-pCR cases averaged 17.1±24.2%. TIL level in post-NAC operation specimens was negatively correlated with post-NAC pathologic T stage (Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, p=0.002; Figure 2A), but was not significantly correlated with post-NAC pathologic N stage (Spearman's rho=−0.102, p=0.304), RCB class (rho=−0.148, p=0.135), or Miller-Payne grade (rho=0.172, p=0.08). Post-NAC TILs in groups subdivided by RCB class were 21.3±16.4%, 19.7±3.1%, and 10.0±3.1%, for RCB class I, II, and III respectively. Post-NAC TILs exhibited no correlation with RCB class (Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, p=0.136; Figure 2B).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Correlation between the level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in pre-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) specimens and other clinicopathologic factors. (A) clinical T stage, (B) histologic grade, (C) pathologic complete response (pCR), (D) residual cancer burden (RCB) class.

Changes in TILs. In a pair-wise analysis of TILs from 104 non-pCR cases, levels were lower in post-NAC operation specimens than in pre-NAC biopsies (biopsies, 19.8±18.0%; operations, 17.1±24.2%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.074, Figure 3).

Changes in TILs were calculated by subtracting the TIL level of pre-NAC biopsy specimens from the TIL level of post-NAC operation specimens in the non-pCR group. The mean value for change in TILs was −2.69, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of −7.65 and 2.26. Changes in TILs showed a significantly positive correlation with Miller-Payne grade (Jonckheere-Terpstra trend test, p=0.035). However, changes in TILs from post-NAC operation specimens were not significantly correlated with post-NAC pathologic T stage (rho=−0.175, p=0.076), pathologic N stage (rho=0.079, p=0.424), or RCB class (rho=−0.007, p=0.941).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Correlation between the level of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) specimens and pathologic T stage (A) or residual cancer burden (RCB) class (B).

We classified tumors into three groups using the 95%CI for mean value of change in TILs [decreased (below the 95%CI=−7.65), not significantly changed (between 95%CI), and increased (over the 95%CI=2.26)]. Forty-three cases (41.3%) displayed a decrease in TIL level, whereas 29 cases (27.9%) showed an increase and no significant changes were found in 32 cases (30.8%).

Survival analysis. In a univariate analysis of all patients, RCB class [hazard ratio (HR)=2.255, 95%CI=1.718-2.959, p<0.001], TIL level pre-NAC (HR=0.977, 95%CI=0.959-0.995, p=0.013), TIL level post-NAC (HR=0.970, 95%CI=0.960-0.990, p=0.004) were associated with DFS, but age (HR=0.977, 95%CI=0.949-1.006, p=0.117) was not. As the TIL levels pre- and post-NAC were not independent factors, two multivariate analyses were performed. In multivariate analysis including the level of TILs pre-NAC, both RCB class (HR=2.640, 95%CI=1.799-3.874, p<0.001) and level of TILs pre-NAC (HR=0.982, 95%CI=0.964-0.999, p=0.043) were independent prognostic factors for DFS. In multivariate analysis including the level of TILs post-NAC, RCB class (HR=2.278, 95%CI=1.552-4.793, p<0.001) and the level of TILs post-NAC (HR=0.977, 95%CI=0.960-0.995, p=0.013) were also independent prognostic factors for DFS.

As changes in TILs can be evaluated only in non-pCR cases, we analyzed the prognostic significance of post-NAC TILs and changes in TILs in a subgroup of patients with non-pCR. In univariate analysis of non-pCR cases, RCB class (HR=3.202, 95%CI=1.823-5.623, p<0.001), pre-NAC TIL level(HR=0.976, 95%CI=0.958-0.995, p=0.015), and post-NAC TIL level (HR=0.973, 95%CI=0.956-0.992, p=0.004) were significant prognostic factors for DFS, but changes in TILs (HR=0.993, 95%CI=0.983-1.04, p=0.221) were not associated with DFS. Multivariate analysis including the level of pre-NAC TILs revealed that the level of pre-NAC TILs (HR=0.977, 95%CI=0.957-0.996, p=0.019), age (HR=0.949, 95%CI=0.918-0.981, p=0.002), and RCB class (HR=3.690, 95%CI=2.020-6.738, p<0.001) were significant prognostic factors for DFS. In multivariate analysis including the level of TILs post-NAC, the level of post-NAC TILs (HR=0.979, 95%CI=0.961-0.997, p=0.023), age (HR=0.964, 95%CI=0.934-0.994, p=0.019), and RCB class (HR=3.316, 95%CI=1.834-5.998, p<0.001) were also significant independent prognostic factors for DFS.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Multivariate analysis for disease-free survival in non-pathologic complete response cases with change in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) level subgroups.

Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated that DFS was stratified by RCB class in all cases (p<0.001; Figure 4A). In the non-pCR group, altered TIL level subgroups (decreased, not significantly changed, and increased) correlated with different DFS (p<0.001; Figure 4B). Groups with a change in TIL level (decrease or increase) exhibited better DFS than that of the unchanged group. Although the increased TIL group showed better survival outcomes than the decreased TIL group, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.338).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Changes in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in non-pathologic complete response (pCR) cases.

In multivariate analysis of non-pCR cases, RCB class (p<0.001), age (p=0.008), and change in TIL level (p=0.012) were independent prognostic factors for DFS (Table III).

Discussion

We found a prognostic significance for altered levels of TILs in pre- and post-NAC specimens. The relationship between TILs and outcome in breast cancer was first reported in 1992 (14). Since then, the prognostic value of TILs in breast cancer has been extensively studied (15, 16), with large scale clinical trials for adjuvant chemotherapy revealing that increased levels of TILs (for each 10% increment of stromal TILs) in TNBC were associated with improved clinical outcome (HR≤0.87 for DFS, p≤0.032) (16). In TNBC patients without adjuvant systemic therapy, low levels of TILs (≤10%) were significantly correlated with distant metastasis (p=0.013) and inferior 10 year breast cancer specific survival rate (88.3% for pathologic N0 TNBC patients with low level of TILs vs. 100% for those with high level of TILs, p=0.036, n=64) (17).

TILs in pre-NAC pCR cases were significantly more numerous than those in the non-pCR group. High pre-NAC levels of TILs are a known predictive marker for NAC response in all breast cancer subtypes (16, 18, 19). In addition, pre-NAC TIL levels are reported to be a strong prognostic factor for overall survival (20) and distant recurrence (21). We also identified pre-NAC TILs as an independent prognostic factor for DFS in all patients, and a subgroup of patients with non-pCR.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves for disease-free survival (DFS). (A) Kaplan–Meier curves with residual cancer burden (RCB) class for all cases, (B) Kaplan–Meier curves with changes in TIL in non-pathologic complete response (pCR) cases.

Recently, the International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group published guidelines for assessing TILs in specimens from patients after NAC (22). The principle of assessing TILs is fundamentally similar for primary breast cancer without NAC. It is recommended that TILs be assessed in the stroma of the residual tumor bed of invasive carcinoma. Further, TILs in tumor necrosis and crush artefacts should be excluded, while TILs around tumor cells embedded within histiocytic aggregations should be assessed. In addition to pre-NAC TILs, post-NAC TIL levels in residual tissues are significantly associated with prognosis in TNBC (23-25). In this study, the level of post-NAC TILs was an independent prognostic factor for DFS. TILs post-NAC added significant prognostic value to a multivariate analysis including RCB class for DFS (p<0.001) in an analysis of 375 TNBC cases (23). Post-NAC CD4+ TILs were also associated with survival in RCB-II and RCB-III classes (p=0.05 and p=0.05, respectively)(26).

The prognostic significance of changes in TILs after NAC has largely not been studied. Liu et al. reported that increased TILs after NAC were associated with poor prognosis in 30 cases of breast cancer including all subtypes (27). On the other hand, Miyashita et al. reported that increased CD8+ TILs after NAC were associated with better prognosis than the decreased CD8+ TIL group in 78 cases of TNBC (28). In our cohort, patients with increased levels of TILs after NAC also exhibited improved survival outcomes compared to the survival outcomes in those with decreased levels of TILs, but the difference was not statistically significant. However, patients with significant changes in TILs after NAC, both an increase and decrease, showed better prognosis than did the unchanged group. To clarify the prognostic significance of changes in TILs after NAC, further studies with a larger sample size are necessary.

In pair-wise analysis, the levels of TILs were lower in post-NAC operation specimens than in pre-NAC biopsies, but not to a statistically significant degree in this study. Pelekanou et al. compared 43 pairs of pre- and post-NAC breast cancer tissues, and the median TIL counts were 5% (range=0-60%) for pre-NAC and 7.5% (range=0-40%) for post-NAC (29). They found that 5% was the median difference in TIL levels (range=0-50%) between pre- and post-NAC, indicating an overall increase in TILs in residual specimens (p=0.09). However, when the same author compared 59 pairs of pre- and post-NAC breast cancer tissues from the SWOG S0800 phase II NAC trial, a majority of tumors (78%) showed decreases in TIL levels after NAC, and the mean change in TILs was a 15% decrease (30). In our 517 non-pCR cases of all subtypes of breast cancer with NAC, the level of TILs decreased in 64.0% (n=331), was not changed in 18.4% (n=95), and increased in 17.6% (n=91) (unpublished data). Similarly, Hamy et al. reported that TIL levels decreased in 61.6% of tumors (n=441), did not change in 17.7% (n=127), and increased in 20.7% (n=148) after NAC in all subtypes of breast cancer.

Dieci et al. evaluated TILs on 19 TNBC biopsy tissues derived from patients with a high (>60%) post-NAC (anthracycline- or anthracycline-taxane-based regimen) TIL level (24). Fifteen out of 19 patients (79%) had a low (≤60%) pre-NAC TIL level. All but one case showed a higher level of TILs in post-NAC tissues compared to that in pre-NAC biopsies. Likewise, in our 104 non-pCR cases of TNBC with NAC, 12 cases showed high post-NAC TIL levels. Except for one, pre-NAC TIL levels were lower than those in post-NAC, in all cases. Therefore, despite the majority of cases showing decreased or no significant changes in TIL levels, several cases displayed increased TIL influx and a lymphocyte predominant phenotype after NAC in TNBC.

Reductions in immune cells might be a direct effect of chemotherapy. Increases in TILs can be explained by NAC inducing the release of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) through killing or otherwise damaging cancer cells. DAMPs can activate immune cells, alter the tumor microenvironment, generate increased tumor-specific neoantigens in cancer cells, and recruit immune cells. Immune monitoring of the tumor microenvironment could be an additional prognostic factor and might enhance the successful treatment of breast cancer with NAC in the era of innovative immunotherapies.

TILs can be used as anti-cancer immune cell therapeutics; we previously cultured breast cancer TILs and found that the amount of cultured TILs was less in breast cancers with NAC than in those without NAC (31). However, in TNBC, TILs showing in vitro anti-tumor reactivity toward autologous cancer cells were derived from tumors with NAC (unpublished data). Therefore, TILs after NAC preserve T cells with T cell receptors reactive to autologous tumor cells and have the potential to attack tumors. Immune monitoring of the tumor microenvironment could enhance the successful treatment of breast cancer with NAC. Further studies are required to characterize immune infiltration in residual disease after NAC to identify candidates who could benefit from adjuvant therapy including immune checkpoint inhibitors.

In conclusion, we found a prognostic significance for altered levels of TILs in pre- and post-NAC TNBC specimens. Assessment of TILs before and after NAC can provide valuable prognostic information for TNBC patients.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Basic Science Research Programs through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning, Republic of Korea (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07048831).

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Conceptualization: HJL; Data curation: ML; Formal analysis: HL, HJL; Investigation: HL, ML, GG, HJL; Methodology: HL, HJL; Project administration: HL; Writing—original draft: HL; Writing—review & editing: ML, JHS, GG, HJL

  • Conflicts of Interest

    No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

  • Received February 10, 2020.
  • Revision received February 19, 2020.
  • Accepted February 20, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chen AM,
    2. Meric-Bernstam F,
    3. Hunt KK,
    4. Thames HD,
    5. Oswald MJ,
    6. Outlaw ED,
    7. Strom EA,
    8. McNeese MD,
    9. Kuerer HM,
    10. Ross MI,
    11. Singletary SE,
    12. Ames FC,
    13. Feig BW,
    14. Sahin AA,
    15. Perkins GH,
    16. Schechter NR,
    17. Hortobagyi GN,
    18. Buchholz TA
    : Breast conservation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: The MD Anderson Cancer Center Experience. J Clin Oncol 22(12): 2303-2312, 2004. PMID: 15197191. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2004.09.062
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Shuai Y,
    2. Ma L
    : Prognostic value of pathologic complete response and the alteration of breast cancer immunohistochemical biomarkers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Pathol Res Pract 215(1): 29-33, 2019. PMID: 30501932. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.11.003
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Han D,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Wang Q,
    5. Tian J,
    6. Yao J,
    7. Yuan L,
    8. Qian K,
    9. Zou Q,
    10. Yi W,
    11. Zhou E,
    12. Yang K
    : Prognostic values of ki-67 in neoadjuvant setting for breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Future Oncol 13(11): 1021-1034, 2017. PMID: 28088868. DOI: 10.2217/fon-2016-0428
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Jiang YZ,
    2. Yu KD,
    3. Bao J,
    4. Peng WT,
    5. Shao ZM
    : Favorable prognostic impact in loss of tp53 and pik3ca mutations after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Cancer Res 74(13): 3399-3407, 2014. PMID: 24924774. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0092
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Tan SH,
    2. Sapari NS,
    3. Miao H,
    4. Hartman M,
    5. Loh M,
    6. Chng WJ,
    7. Iau P,
    8. Buhari SA,
    9. Soong R,
    10. Lee SC
    : High-throughput mutation profiling changes before and 3 weeks after chemotherapy in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. PLoS One 10(12): e0142466, 2015. PMID: 26630576. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142466
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gonzalez-Angulo AM,
    2. Iwamoto T,
    3. Liu S,
    4. Chen H,
    5. Do KA,
    6. Hortobagyi GN,
    7. Mills GB,
    8. Meric-Bernstam F,
    9. Symmans WF,
    10. Pusztai L
    : Gene expression, molecular class changes, and pathway analysis after neoadjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 18(4): 1109-1119, 2012. PMID: 22235097. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2762
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Tan SH,
    2. Lee SC
    : An update on chemotherapy and tumor gene expression profiles in breast cancer. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 8(9): 1083-1113, 2012. PMID: 22681410. DOI: 10.1517/17425255.2012.694867
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Salgado R,
    2. Denkert C,
    3. Demaria S,
    4. Sirtaine N,
    5. Klauschen F,
    6. Pruneri G,
    7. Wienert S,
    8. Van den Eynden G,
    9. Baehner FL,
    10. Penault-Llorca F,
    11. Perez EA,
    12. Thompson EA,
    13. Symmans WF,
    14. Richardson AL,
    15. Brock J,
    16. Criscitiello C,
    17. Bailey H,
    18. Ignatiadis M,
    19. Floris G,
    20. Sparano J,
    21. Kos Z,
    22. Nielsen T,
    23. Rimm DL,
    24. Allison KH,
    25. Reis-Filho JS,
    26. Loibl S,
    27. Sotiriou C,
    28. Viale G,
    29. Badve S,
    30. Adams S,
    31. Willard-Gallo K,
    32. Loi S,
    33. International TWG
    : The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (tils) in breast cancer: Recommendations by an international tils working group 2014. Ann Oncol 26(2): 259-271, 2015. PMID: 25214542. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu450
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Denkert C,
    2. Wienert S,
    3. Poterie A,
    4. Loibl S,
    5. Budczies J,
    6. Badve S,
    7. Bago-Horvath Z,
    8. Bane A,
    9. Bedri S,
    10. Brock J,
    11. Chmielik E,
    12. Christgen M,
    13. Colpaert C,
    14. Demaria S,
    15. Van den Eynden G,
    16. Floris G,
    17. Fox SB,
    18. Gao D,
    19. Ingold Heppner B,
    20. Kim SR,
    21. Kos Z,
    22. Kreipe HH,
    23. Lakhani SR,
    24. Penault-Llorca F,
    25. Pruneri G,
    26. Radosevic-Robin N,
    27. Rimm DL,
    28. Schnitt SJ,
    29. Sinn BV,
    30. Sinn P,
    31. Sirtaine N,
    32. O'Toole SA,
    33. Viale G,
    34. Van de Vijver K,
    35. de Wind R,
    36. von Minckwitz G,
    37. Klauschen F,
    38. Untch M,
    39. Fasching PA,
    40. Reimer T,
    41. Willard-Gallo K,
    42. Michiels S,
    43. Loi S,
    44. Salgado R
    : Standardized evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in breast cancer: Results of the ring studies of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group. Mod Pathol 29(10): 1155-1164, 2016. PMID: 27363491. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2016.109
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Wolff AC,
    2. Hammond MEH,
    3. Schwartz JN,
    4. Hagerty KL,
    5. Allred DC,
    6. Cote RJ,
    7. Dowsett M,
    8. Fitzgibbons PL,
    9. Hanna WM,
    10. Langer A,
    11. McShane LM,
    12. Paik S,
    13. Pegram MD,
    14. Perez EA,
    15. Press MF,
    16. Rhodes A,
    17. Sturgeon C,
    18. Taube SE,
    19. Tubbs R,
    20. Vance GH,
    21. Vijver Mvd,
    22. Wheeler TM,
    23. Hayes DF
    : American society of clinical oncology/college of american pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 25(1): 118-145, 2007. PMID: 17159189. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2006.09.2775
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Salgado R,
    2. Denkert C,
    3. Demaria S,
    4. Sirtaine N,
    5. Klauschen F,
    6. Pruneri G,
    7. Wienert S,
    8. Van den Eynden G,
    9. Baehner FL,
    10. Penault-Llorca F,
    11. Perez EA,
    12. Thompson EA,
    13. Symmans WF,
    14. Richardson AL,
    15. Brock J,
    16. Criscitiello C,
    17. Bailey H,
    18. Ignatiadis M,
    19. Floris G,
    20. Sparano J,
    21. Kos Z,
    22. Nielsen T,
    23. Rimm DL,
    24. Allison KH,
    25. Reis-Filho JS,
    26. Loibl S,
    27. Sotiriou C,
    28. Viale G,
    29. Badve S,
    30. Adams S,
    31. Willard-Gallo K,
    32. Loi S
    : The evaluation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (tils) in breast cancer: Recommendations by an international tils working group 2014. Ann Oncol 26(2): 259-271, 2014. PMID: 25214542. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu450
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Symmans WF,
    2. Peintinger F,
    3. Hatzis C,
    4. Rajan R,
    5. Kuerer H,
    6. Valero V,
    7. Assad L,
    8. Poniecka A,
    9. Hennessy B,
    10. Green M,
    11. Buzdar AU,
    12. Singletary SE,
    13. Hortobagyi GN,
    14. Pusztai L
    : Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25(28): 4414-4422, 2007. PMID: 17785706. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.10.6823
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Ogston KN,
    2. Miller ID,
    3. Payne S,
    4. Hutcheon AW,
    5. Sarkar TK,
    6. Smith I,
    7. Schofield A,
    8. Heys SD
    : A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: Prognostic significance and survival. Breast 12(5): 320-327, 2003. PMID: 14659147. DOI: 10.1016/s0960-9776(03)00106-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Aaltomaa S,
    2. Lipponen P,
    3. Eskelinen M,
    4. Kosma VM,
    5. Marin S,
    6. Alhava E,
    7. Syrjanen K
    : Lymphocyte infiltrates as a prognostic variable in female breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 28A(4-5): 859-864, 1992. PMID: 1524909. DOI: 10.1016/0959-8049(92)90134-n
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Savas P,
    2. Salgado R,
    3. Denkert C,
    4. Sotiriou C,
    5. Darcy PK,
    6. Smyth MJ,
    7. Loi S
    : Clinical relevance of host immunity in breast cancer: From tils to the clinic. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 13(4): 228-241, 2016. PMID: 26667975. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Wein L,
    2. Savas P,
    3. Luen SJ,
    4. Virassamy B,
    5. Salgado R,
    6. Loi S
    : Clinical validity and utility of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in routine clinical practice for breast cancer patients: Current and future directions. Front Oncol 7: 156, 2017. PMID: 28824872. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00156
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Park JH,
    2. Lee HJ,
    3. Lee SB,
    4. Ahn JH,
    5. Kim JE,
    6. Jung KH,
    7. Gong G,
    8. Son BH,
    9. Ahn SH,
    10. Kim SB
    : Intrinsic prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in systemically untreated patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer. Anticancer Res 39(6): 3111-3119, 2019. PMID: 31177156. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13447
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Denkert C,
    2. von Minckwitz G,
    3. Darb-Esfahani S,
    4. Lederer B,
    5. Heppner BI,
    6. Weber KE,
    7. Budczies J,
    8. Huober J,
    9. Klauschen F,
    10. Furlanetto J,
    11. Schmitt WD,
    12. Blohmer JU,
    13. Karn T,
    14. Pfitzner BM,
    15. Kummel S,
    16. Engels K,
    17. Schneeweiss A,
    18. Hartmann A,
    19. Noske A,
    20. Fasching PA,
    21. Jackisch C,
    22. van Mackelenbergh M,
    23. Sinn P,
    24. Schem C,
    25. Hanusch C,
    26. Untch M,
    27. Loibl S
    : Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and prognosis in different subtypes of breast cancer: A pooled analysis of 3771 patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy. Lancet Oncol 19(1): 40-50, 2018. PMID: 29233559. DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30904-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. West NR,
    2. Milne K,
    3. Truong PT,
    4. Macpherson N,
    5. Nelson BH,
    6. Watson PH
    : Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes predict response to anthracycline-based chemotherapy in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 13(6): R126, 2011. PMID: 22151962. DOI: 10.1186/bcr3072
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Dieci MV,
    2. Mathieu MC,
    3. Guarneri V,
    4. Conte P,
    5. Delaloge S,
    6. Andre F,
    7. Goubar A
    : Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in two phase iii randomized adjuvant breast cancer trials. Ann Oncol 26(8): 1698-1704, 2015. PMID: 25995301. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv239
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Loi S,
    2. Michiels S,
    3. Salgado R,
    4. Sirtaine N,
    5. Jose V,
    6. Fumagalli D,
    7. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P-L,
    8. Bono P,
    9. Kataja V,
    10. Desmedt C,
    11. Piccart MJ,
    12. Loibl S,
    13. Denkert C,
    14. Smyth MJ,
    15. Joensuu H,
    16. Sotiriou C
    : Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes are prognostic in triple negative breast cancer and predictive for trastuzumab benefit in early breast cancer: Results from the finher trial. Ann Oncol 25(8): 1544-1550, 2014. PMID: 24608200. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Dieci MV,
    2. Radosevic-Robin N,
    3. Fineberg S,
    4. van den Eynden G,
    5. Ternes N,
    6. Penault-Llorca F,
    7. Pruneri G,
    8. D'Alfonso TM,
    9. Demaria S,
    10. Castaneda C,
    11. Sanchez J,
    12. Badve S,
    13. Michiels S,
    14. Bossuyt V,
    15. Rojo F,
    16. Singh B,
    17. Nielsen T,
    18. Viale G,
    19. Kim SR,
    20. Hewitt S,
    21. Wienert S,
    22. Loibl S,
    23. Rimm D,
    24. Symmans F,
    25. Denkert C,
    26. Adams S,
    27. Loi S,
    28. Salgado R,
    29. International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group on Breast C
    : Update on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (tils) in breast cancer, including recommendations to assess tils in residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy and in carcinoma in situ: A report of the international immuno-oncology biomarker working group on breast cancer. Semin Cancer Biol 52(Pt 2): 16-25, 2018. PMID: 29024776. DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2017.10.003
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Luen SJ,
    2. Salgado R,
    3. Dieci MV,
    4. Vingiani A,
    5. Curigliano G,
    6. Gould RE,
    7. Castaneda C,
    8. D'Alfonso T,
    9. Sanchez J,
    10. Cheng E,
    11. Andreopoulou E,
    12. Castillo M,
    13. Adams S,
    14. Demaria S,
    15. Symmans WF,
    16. Michiels S,
    17. Loi S
    : Prognostic implications of residual disease tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and residual cancer burden in triple-negative breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 30(2): 236-242, 2019. PMID: 30590484. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdy547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Dieci MV,
    2. Criscitiello C,
    3. Goubar A,
    4. Viale G,
    5. Conte P,
    6. Guarneri V,
    7. Ficarra G,
    8. Mathieu MC,
    9. Delaloge S,
    10. Curigliano G,
    11. Andre F
    : Prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes on residual disease after primary chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective multicenter study. Ann Oncol 25(3): 611-618, 2014. PMID: 24401929. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdt556
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Loi S,
    2. Dushyanthen S,
    3. Beavis PA,
    4. Salgado R,
    5. Denkert C,
    6. Savas P,
    7. Combs S,
    8. Rimm DL,
    9. Giltnane JM,
    10. Estrada MV,
    11. Sanchez V,
    12. Sanders ME,
    13. Cook RS,
    14. Pilkinton MA,
    15. Mallal SA,
    16. Wang K,
    17. Miller VA,
    18. Stephens PJ,
    19. Yelensky R,
    20. Doimi FD,
    21. Gomez H,
    22. Ryzhov SV,
    23. Darcy PK,
    24. Arteaga CL,
    25. Balko JM
    : Ras/mapk activation is associated with reduced tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in triple-negative breast cancer: Therapeutic cooperation between MEK and PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res 22(6): 1499-1509, 2016. PMID: 26515496. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1125
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Pinard C,
    2. Debled M,
    3. Ben Rejeb H,
    4. Velasco V,
    5. Tunon de Lara C,
    6. Hoppe S,
    7. Richard E,
    8. Brouste V,
    9. Bonnefoi H,
    10. MacGrogan G
    : Residual cancer burden index and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subtypes in triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 179(1): 11-23, 2019. PMID: 31529299. DOI: 10.1007/s10549-019-05437-z
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Xu Y,
    3. Yu M,
    4. Liu Z,
    5. Xu Y,
    6. Ma G,
    7. Zhou W,
    8. Kong P,
    9. Ling L,
    10. Wang S,
    11. Pan H,
    12. Zhao Y
    : Increased stromal infiltrating lymphocytes are associated with circulating tumor cells and metastatic relapse in breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Manag Res 11: 10791-10800, 2019. PMID: 31920388. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S220327
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Miyashita M,
    2. Sasano H,
    3. Tamaki K,
    4. Hirakawa H,
    5. Takahashi Y,
    6. Nakagawa S,
    7. Watanabe G,
    8. Tada H,
    9. Suzuki A,
    10. Ohuchi N,
    11. Ishida T
    : Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating cd8+ and foxp3+ lymphocytes in residual tumors and alterations in these parameters after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: A retrospective multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res 17(1): 124, 2015. PMID: 26341640. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-015-0632-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Pelekanou V,
    2. Carvajal-Hausdorf DE,
    3. Altan M,
    4. Wasserman B,
    5. Carvajal-Hausdorf C,
    6. Wimberly H,
    7. Brown J,
    8. Lannin D,
    9. Pusztai L,
    10. Rimm DL
    : Effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in breast cancer and its clinical significance. Breast Cancer Res 19(1): 91, 2017. PMID: 28784153. DOI: 10.1186/s13058-017-0884-8
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Pelekanou V,
    2. Barlow WE,
    3. Nahleh ZA,
    4. Wasserman B,
    5. Lo YC,
    6. von Wahlde MK,
    7. Hayes D,
    8. Hortobagyi GN,
    9. Gralow J,
    10. Tripathy D,
    11. Porter P,
    12. Szekely B,
    13. Hatzis C,
    14. Rimm DL,
    15. Pusztai L
    : Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and PD-L1 expression in pre- and posttreatment breast cancers in the swog s0800 phase II neoadjuvant chemotherapy trial. Mol Cancer Ther 17(6): 1324-1331, 2018. PMID: 29588392. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-1005
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Lee HJ,
    2. Kim YA,
    3. Sim CK,
    4. Heo SH,
    5. Song IH,
    6. Park HS,
    7. Park SY,
    8. Bang WS,
    9. Park IA,
    10. Lee M,
    11. Lee JH,
    12. Cho YS,
    13. Chang S,
    14. Jung J,
    15. Kim J,
    16. Lee SB,
    17. Kim SY,
    18. Lee MS,
    19. Gong G
    : Expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and their potential for application as adoptive cell transfer therapy in human breast cancer. Oncotarget 8(69): 113345-113359, 2017. PMID: 29371915. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.23007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 4
April 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Changes in Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Clinical Significance in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Changes in Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Clinical Significance in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
HYUN LEE, MISEON LEE, JEONG-HAN SEO, GYUNGYUB GONG, HEE JIN LEE
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 1883-1890; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14142

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Changes in Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Clinical Significance in Triple Negative Breast Cancer
HYUN LEE, MISEON LEE, JEONG-HAN SEO, GYUNGYUB GONG, HEE JIN LEE
Anticancer Research Apr 2020, 40 (4) 1883-1890; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14142
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Modulation of Immune System - Strategy in the Treatment of Breast Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 6-O-Carboxypropyl-α-Tocotrienol Enhances the Anticancer Effects of Bortezomib Without Suppressing NRF1 and NRF3 in Colorectal Cancer Cells
  • Imbalance Between CD44 and STAT3 Enhances Spheroid Viability and Impairs Pembrolizumab Response in Urothelial Cancer
  • Imipramine Targets Apoptosis, Metastasis, and EGFR/SRC-mediated EMT in Oral Cancer Cells
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • neoadjuvant chemotherapy
  • tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire