Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Sessile Serrated Polyps Without Dysplasia Thrives With Asymmetric Relocation of Cell Proliferation-domains

CARLOS A. RUBIO and PETER T. SCHMIDT
Anticancer Research March 2020, 40 (3) 1535-1542; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14099
CARLOS A. RUBIO
1Gastrointestinal and Liver Research Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Carlos.Rubio@ki.se
PETER T. SCHMIDT
2Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute and University Hospital, Centre for Digestive Diseases, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Sessile serrated polyps without dysplasia (SSPND) are characterized by crypts with serrated epithelium, albeit with irregular, corrupted shapes (CCS). Patients and Methods: Cell proliferation was explored in the CCS from 60 SSPND and in the crypts from 12 normal colons. Sections were immuno-stained with the Ki-67 proliferation-cell (PC) marker, and with the p53 tumour-suppressor gene. Results: Three predominant PC-phenotypes were found in the CCS from the 60 SSPND: 44 (73.3%) exhibited ectopic, asymmetric, randomly distributed PC-clusters, 12 (20.0%), continuous PC in one or in both slopes of the crypts, and in the remaining 4 (6.7%), single, randomly distributed PC were recorded. In contrast, the scrutiny of more than 200,000 normal colon crypts (controls) showed symmetrically aligned PC, restricted to the lower third of the crypts. p53-up-regulation in CCS was recorded in 11(18.3%) of the 60 NDSSP, but in none of the normal crypts in the 12 controls. Conclusion: The non-dysplastic epithelium that lines CCS in SSPND coexists with an asymmetric relocation of the PC-domains. In addition, the CCS in nearly one-fifth of the SSPND exhibited p53-up-regulated cells. Taken together, the non-dysplastic CCS epithelium in SSPND thrives with somatic mutations. The accretion of putative mutated non-dysplastic CCS might be a crucial event in the evolution of colonic SSPND towards sessile serrated adenomas.

  • Colon
  • sessile serrated polyps
  • non-dysplastic
  • cell proliferation
  • p53 up-regulated cells

Progression of colorectal adenoma to carcinoma is one of the most intensively investigated trails in human malignancies (1-3). In later years, colorectal serrated polyps, comprising hyperplastic polyps (HP), sessile serrated adenomas/polyps (SSA/P), and traditional serrated adenomas (TSA), have received much attention (4-6). Although the most common of all serrated polyps -namely HP- is considered innocuous, patients with Hyperplastic polyposis coli syndrome (HPCS) are at a high risk to develop a colorectal cancer (7-9). Sporadic, solitary SSA/P and TSA are also prone to progress to invasive carcinoma (10-12). About 30% of all colorectal carcinomas in humans, progress via the serrated pathway (10).

At endoscopic examination, SSA/P appears as a flat or minimally elevated, pale lesion, with indistinct borders and loss of the vascular pattern (13). However, SSA/P are often concealed by a mucus cap or debris (13, 14). Overlooked SSA/P seem to account for a significant proportion of interval-cancers evolving between two surveillance colonoscopic examinations (14). At histologic examination, the normal colon mucosa is composed of a single epithelial cell layer with tubes-like invaginations, called crypts. In histological sections cut perpendicular to the mucosal surface, the crypts are aligned as “row of test tubes” (15-17). The epithelial lining is built of mucus-secreting goblet cells and columnar absorptive cells. Goblet cells are found practically in the entire crypt, chiefly in the distal colon (18). In contrast, SSA/P are epitomized by epithelial serrations often reaching the lower third of the crypts and by crypts with bottle-shaped basal dilatations or with lateral extensions, running parallel to the muscularis mucosae (crypt horizontalization). Crypts with lateral extensions have been described as resembling a boot, an L or an inverted T (19-22). According to some authors, the presence of a single boot-like crypt, a single L-like crypt or a single inverted T-shaped crypt, is indicative of SSA/P (22). Occasionally, herniation through the muscularis mucosae (pseudo-invasion) may occur (19-22).

In 2003, Torlacovic et al. found abnormal cell proliferation in up to 18% of 51 serrated polyps (23) and in 2008, Torlacovic et al. reported either expanded, reduced or absent cell proliferation in the various crypts from 28 SSA (24), but the phenomenon was not further elaborated. In 2005, Higuchi et al. found a significant decrease in Ki-67-positive cells in the full length of the crypts in 27 SSA/P (25). Subsequently, Fujimori et al. recorded a high percentage of asymmetrically distributed proliferating cells in 24 SSA/P, but the phenomenon was not further elaborated (26). More recently, Hisamatzu et al. found in 42 SSA/P, that the proliferative zone was mainly basal (27), and Fortuna et al. that MCM2 (a protein involved in DNA replication) demonstrated expansion of the proliferative compartments in 100% of 58 SSA; some crypts exhibited full MCM2 staining. SSA with dysplasia showed consistent diffuse polyp staining (28). Hence, Higuchi, Hisamatzu and Fortuna (25, 27, 28) found no asymmetrical cell proliferation in SSA/P. Whether the asymmetrical cell proliferation remained unnoticed, unexplored or it was not present, remains unknown.

In previous publications, we found below the neoplastic tissue of sporadic conventional polypoid adenomas (29) and of non-polypoid adenomas (30), colon crypts with normal epithelium displaying corrupted shapes (CCS). Subsequent studies of sections immuno-stained with the proliferation marker Ki-67, and with the tumour-suppressor p53, revealed CCS with disparate distributions of proliferating cells (PC) and p53-mutated cells, both in conventional polypoid adenomas and in non-polypoid adenomas (29, 30). These findings strongly suggested that the CCS beneath the neoplastic tissue of both conventional polypoid adenomas and non-polypoid adenomas, harbored somatic mutations.

The purpose of the present investigation was to assess the distribution of PC in the CCS from a cohort of sessile serrated colonic polyps without dysplasia (SSNDP).

Patients and Methods

Sections (4 μm thick) from 60 endoscopically-removed SSPND were retrieved from the archives of the Department of Pathology, Karolinska Institute. Sections were immunoassayed with the proliferation marker Ki-67 (batch MIB1, DAKO Automation, Denmark). Additional sections were also immuno-stained with the primary mouse monoclonal antibody (IgG1, kappa) against the human p53 protein (antip53, DO-7; Ventana Medical System, Inc., Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

PC in CCS from SSPND. The Ki-67 antibody labels all transit amplifying daughter cells (TADs) (26-30). By using 10× oculars and 4× Apo objective (aperture number 0.20), the FOV was 5 mm in diameter. At that magnification, all PC in CCS are easily identified.

p53 up-regulated cells in CCS from SSPND. The p53 transcription factor (encoded by the human gene TP53) is a central tumor-suppressor that regulates numerous signaling pathways in carcinogenesis. Given the laboratory resources needed for TP53 gene sequencing, most researchers use p53 immuno-histochemistry as a surrogate, assuming that p53 overexpression is associated with a mutation, and that the absence of expression is indicative of wild-type p53. In this work, only cells exhibiting p53 immune-reactivity, of the same strong intensity as the neoplastic cells of the neoplastic tissue from a colon adenoma included in positive-run controls, were regarded as overexpressing the p53 protein. To highlight up-regulated cells in 24/60 SSNDP, the immunostaining in some cases was performed without Harris-hematoxylin counterstain.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

The frequency of predominant PC phenotypes in crypts with normal epithelial lining albeit with corrupted shapes (CCS) found underneath the neoplastic canopy in 60 sessile serrated non-dysplastic polyps (SSNDP).

Cell proliferation in normal colon crypts. Sections from 12 normal colonic segments proximal or distal to surgically removed colonic adenocarcinoma were immuno-stained with Ki-67 (batch MIB1) and p53 immunostain.

Statistical analysis. The non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test was applied to compare difference between groups. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. The Regional Ethical Review Board in Stockholm (no. 2018/688-32 and 2018/2024-32), approved this study.

Results

PC phenotypes in CCS from SSPND. The PC-distribution in CCS could vary in individual SSPND. Therefore, the predominant CCS-PC-phenotype was selected to epitomize each lesion. Three predominant PC-phenotypes were found in the CCS from the 60 SSPND: i) Random, asymmetrically distributed PC clusters (≥two consecutive PC), ii) Continuous PC-domains (in one or in both sides of the crypts), and iii) Random, asymmetrically distributed single PC (Figures 1 and 2).

Random, asymmetrically distributed PC clusters were found in 44 (73.3%), continuous PC-domains in 12 (20.0%), and random, asymmetrically distributed single PC in the remaining 4 (6.7%) (Table I). The difference between SSPND having CCS with random, asymmetrically distributed PC-clusters and the other two groups in Table I, was significant (p<0.05). Even crypts with less corrupted shapes within SSPND exhibited derangement in PC-domains.

p53 up-regulated cells in CCS from SSPND. In CCS, haphazardly-asymmetrically distributed p53-up-regulated cells, often as single cells were recorded in 18.3% (11/60) of the SSPND (Figure 3). In the remaining 81.7% (49/60) SSPND, no p53-up-regulated cells in CCS could be demonstrated.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Cell proliferation in normal colon crypts and in crypts with corrupted shapes in sessile serrated non-dysplastic polyps of the colon. a: Normal colonic crypts showing symmetrically aligned proliferating cells (PC) in “Indian files”, limited to the lower third of the crypts (Normal colon, Ki-67 original ×4), b to h: Crypts with corrupted shapes (CCS) in sessile serrated non-dysplastic polyps (SSNDP) of the colon, exhibiting anomalous PC-domains; b: CCS with discontinuous PC at the base of a crypt, but with continuous PC in two-thirds of the CCS (Ki-67 immunostain, original ×10), c to h: CCS in SSNDP showing asymmetrically-haphazardly distributed PC (c to e: original ×20, f to h: original ×40).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Cell proliferation in crypts with less corrupted shapes in sessile serrated non-dysplastic polyps of the colon. a, b, c, d, e, and f: Crypts with less corrupted shapes showing atypical PC-distribution, including luminal PC expansion within SSNDP, e and g: Crypts with less corrupted shapes, showing quasi-symmetrical PC-domains in the lower thirds of the crypts, h: Crypt from a SSNDP showing asymmetrically, haphazardly distributed PC domains (Ki-67 immunostain, a to d: original ×20, e to h: original ×40).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

p53-up-regulation in crypts with corrupted shapes in sessile serrated non-dysplastic polyps of the colon. a to f: Crypts in SSNDP with p53 up-regulated cells (at arrows). The immunoreactivity is of the same intensity (+++) as that in f (insert) from a parallel-run positive control (adenomatous tissue from a conventional adenoma), (p53 immunostain, a: original ×4, b, c and d: original ×10, e and f: original ×20).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

The frequency of p-53 up-regulation in sessile serrated non-dysplastic polyps (SSNDP) and in sessile serrated adenoma/polyps (SSA/P) in the literature.

PC and p53 in controls. The review of more than 200,000 crypts found in sections from 12 normal colonic portions proximal or distal to the surgically removed colonic adenocarcinoma, showed symmetrically aligned PC in “Indian files”, restricted to the lower third of the crypts. None of the crypts showed p53-up-regulation.

Discussion

This study showed that the epithelium lining the CCS of SSPND thrives with atypical, i.e. random, asymmetrically, haphazardly distributed PC-domains. This contrasted with the colonic crypts in controls, showing symmetrically aligned PC restricted to the lower third of the crypts (29). Moreover, CCS in 18% of the SSPND disclosed p53-up-regulated cell-domains, while p53-up-regulated cells were not found in any of the normal crypts in the 12 colon segments.

The stem cells in the normal colon, situated at the base of crypts, synchronize the repopulation of the crypts by virtue of their transient amplifying daughter (TAD) progenitor cells (31-35). These progenitor cells [according to Testa (36), between 120 and 150 TAD cells/crypt et al.] comprise the bulk of the PC in the crypts. Since PC-domains are generated by stem cells in normal crypts (33-37), the existence of multiple PC-clusters in TAD from CCS rationally implies the presence of several stem cells in the CCS of SSPND. This assumption is in concert with Baker et al. (38), and Tóth et al. (39) studies in humans. These authors calculated that up to 6 (32), to 8 (33) stem cells, respectively, exist in each normal colon crypt. Thus, contrasting with the standard position of the stem cells at the base of normal crypts (31-37), the stem cells (that fuel proliferating TAD cells) seem to have been relocated in the CCS from SSPND. The relocation of the normal position of the PC-domain in the CCS from SSPND, often as random, asymmetrically located PC-clusters, and less frequently, as continuous PC in one of the slopes of the crypts or as haphazardly distributed single cells, supports the perception that the serrated epithelium of the CCS in SSPND might harbor somatic mutations, a notion substantiated by the finding of up-regulated p53 cell-domains (Figure 3).

Following a single injection of the colonotropic carcinogen azoxymethane, Whetstone and Gold (40) quantified stem cell mutations in the colon of C57Bl/6 mice. The authors found stem cell mutations in the treated group, but not in any of the >100,000 inspected crypts in the control group (40). Obviously, stem cell mutations ensue in the histologically normal crypt epithelium of the colon in carcinogen-treated C57Bl/6 mice.

There are up to 15 times more mitotic figures in an entire colonic crypt than in the 4 μm thick histological sections according to Goodblad et al. (41). Considering that the number of proliferating cells per crypt is much higher than the number of mitotic cells/crypt, it is possible that the CCS in SSNDP with multiple single PC, or with one or more PC-domains, contain a higher number of DNA-synthetizing cells or clusters elsewhere, in other areas from the same serrated crypt. The same might be valid for p53-up-regulated cells in the CCS of SSPND. In the present study, we also used 4 μm thick sections to assess the distribution of PC-domains and p53-up-regulated cells.

Boman and Fields (42) postulated that histological abnormalities occur only in dysplastic crypts. The present demonstration that the non-dysplastic serrated epithelium of CCS in SSPND displayed random, asymmetrically distributed PC-domains, as well as p53-up-regulated cell-domains, strongly suggests that morphological (H&E) changes in the crypts of SSPND might thrive with profound biological alterations in the regulation of both cell proliferation and tumor suppression.

The crucial question is: Which are the morphogenic signals that induce colonic crypts lined with serrated non-dysplastic epithelium, to assume corrupted shapes in SSPND? Morphogenesis is the ability of a system to change its form (43). These authors found that colorectal crypt formation is regulated by a protein encoded by the PTEN gene (phosphatase and tensin homologue deleted on chromosome 10, PTEN). In addition, three-dimensional studies of human colon glands demonstrated that the Na+/H+ exchanger regulatory factor (NHERF1 protein) controls gland morphogenesis (44). Accordingly, the CCS-phenotypes found in SSNDP in the present study, might had been generated by alterations in NHERF1 and PTEN morphogenetic-signals.

The haphazard distribution of PC, and the putative relocation of stem cells in CCS, raises the question as to whether the natural equilibrium between interdependent elements coordinating stem cells-crypt homeostasis, has been severely altered in the CCS from SSPND.

Crypts with corrupted shapes have not been reported in the normal human colon (15-19). However, a recent review of the normal mucosa in 22 colon segments proximal or distal to surgically removed colon cancer at this department showed occasional CCS (mean=3.7 CCS, range=2-5) (23). The remnant crypts in the 22 colonic segments showed crypts with normal shapes. Hence, the normal colonic mucosa (15-19) and the vast majority of the normal mucosa of patients having synchronously a colon cancer (23), display crypts with normal, regular shapes.

Several reports deal with the expression of p53 in SSP without dysplasia and in SSA/P (11, 45-54). The results of those studies are condensed in Table II. It can be observed that out of the seven studies on SSPND (i.e. SSA/P without dysplasia) (11, 47, 48, 50, 51, 53, 54), only one reported p53 immunoreactivity (50). However, the immunoreactivity in that report was described and illustrated as low and diffuse, affecting the cells of the lower third of the crypts (base) (50). In the present work, p53-up-regulated cells were regarded as those having the same degree of intense staining as in a parallel-run positive control (adenomatous epithelium from a conventional adenoma) (Figure 3, insert). Cells with low and diffuse p53 immunoreactivity were disregarded. Thus, the accretion of CCS limited area of a SSPND, exhibiting atypical PC and p53-up-regulated cell-domains in nearly one-fifth of the SSPND investigated, emerges as a remarkable finding, substantiating the notion of putative somatic mutations in SSPND.

As a corollary, SSPND are characterized by crypts with corrupted shapes exhibiting asymmetric distribution of PC-domains. Since the Ki-67 proliferation marker labels only progenitor TAD daughter cells generated by stem cells, each Ki-67-labelled cell domain in CCS must have been generated by a stem cell, rationally suggesting that CCS house several ectopic stem cells (34-38). In addition, haphazardly distributed p53-up-regulated cells, often as single cells, were found in nearly one-fifth of the SSPND investigated. Taken together, the asymmetric rearrangement of the PC-domains as well as the presence of p53-up-regulated cells, suggest that SSPND might harbor somatic mutations. The accretion of putative mutated CCS appears to be a crucial event in the evolution of colonic SSPND towards sessile serrated adenomas.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    CAR: Designed the experiment, performed procedures, data analysis and wrote the manuscript; PTS harvested endoscopically the lesions, introduced suggestions and approved the final manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no competing interests related to this study.

  • Received January 3, 2020.
  • Revision received January 22, 2020.
  • Accepted January 27, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Muto T,
    2. Bussey HJ,
    3. Morson BC
    : The evolution of cancer of the colon and rectum. Cancer 36: 2251-2270, 1975. PMID: 1203876. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.2820360944
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Leslie A,
    2. Carey FA,
    3. Pratt NR,
    4. Pratt N,
    5. Steele R
    : The colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Br J Surg 89: 845-860, 2002. PMID: 12081733. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02120.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Brenner H,
    2. Kloor M,
    3. Pox CP
    : Colorectal cancer. Lancet 383: 1490-1502, 2014. PMID: 24225001. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Snover DC
    : Update on the serrated pathway to colorectal carcinoma. Hum Pathol 42: 1-10, 2011. PMID: 20869746. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2010.06.002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Choi EY,
    2. Appelman HD
    : A historical perspective and exposé on serrated polyps of the colorectum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 140: 1079-1084, 2016. PMID: 27684980. DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2016-0278-RA
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Bettington M,
    2. Brown I,
    3. Rosty C,
    4. Walker N,
    5. Liu C,
    6. Croese J,
    7. Rahman T,
    8. Pearson SA,
    9. McKeone D,
    10. Leggett B,
    11. Whitehall V
    : sessile serrated adenomas in young patients may have limited risk of malignant progression. J Clin Gastroenterol 53: e113-e116, 2019. PMID: 29570172. DOI: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001014
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Hyman NH,
    2. Anderson P,
    3. Blasyk H
    : Hyperplastic polyposis and the risk of colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 47: 2101-2104, 2004. PMID: 15657661. DOI: 10.1007/s10350-004-0709-6
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rubio CA,
    2. Stemme S,
    3. Jaramillo E,
    4. Slezak P
    : Hyperplastic polyposis coli syndrome and colorectal carcinoma. Endoscopy 38: 266-270, 2006. PMID: 16528654. DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-925026
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Orlowska J
    : Hyperplastic polyposis syndrome and the risk of colorectal cancer. Gut 61: 470-471, 2012. PMID: 21636642. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300141
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. O'Brien MJ,
    2. Yang S,
    3. Mack C,
    4. Xu H,
    5. Huang C,
    6. Mulcahy E,
    7. Amorosino M,
    8. Farraye F
    : Comparison of microsatellite instability, CpG island methylation phenotype, BRAF and KRAS status in serrated polyps and traditional adenomas indicates separate pathways to distinct colorectal carcinoma end points. Am J Surg Pathol 30: 1491-1501, 2006. PMID: 17122504. DOI: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213313.36306.85
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bettington M,
    2. Walker N,
    3. Rosty C,
    4. Brown I,
    5. Clouston A,
    6. McKeone D,
    7. Pearson SA,
    8. Leggett B,
    9. Whitehall V
    : Clinicopathological and molecular features of sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia or carcinoma. Gut 66: 97-106, 2017. PMID: 26475632. DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310456
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Rashtak S,
    2. Rego R,
    3. Sweetser SR,
    4. Sinicrope F
    : Sessile serrated polyps and colon cancer prevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 10: 270-278, 2017. PMID: 28325827. DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-16-0264
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kashida H,
    2. Ikehara N,
    3. Hamatani S,
    4. Kudo S,
    5. Kudo M
    : Endoscopic characteristics of colorectal serrated lesions. Hepatogastroenterology 58: c1163-1167, 2011. PMID: 21937375. DOI: 10.5754/hge10093
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Sanduleanu S,
    2. Rutter MD
    : Interval colorectal cancers in inflammatory bowel disease: the grim statistics and true stories. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 24: 337-348, 2014. PMID: 24975525. DOI: 10.1016/j.giec.2014.03.001
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Levine DS,
    2. Haggitt RC
    : Normal histology of the colon. Amer J Surg Pathol 13: 966-984, 1989. PMID: 2679155. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-198911000-00008
    OpenUrl
    1. Mills Stacey E.
    1. Dahl J,
    2. Greenson JK
    : Colon. In: Mills Stacey E. (eds). Histology for pathologists, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Third edition, Philadelphia, PA, USA 25: 629-630, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Rubio CA
    : The histologic structure of the large bowel mucosa and the evolution of the three pathways of colonic carcinogenesis in humans and in experimental animals. In: Recent Studies on Digestive System Anatomy, e-book 3: 1-12, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Mello Rde O,
    2. Silva CM,
    3. Fonte FP,
    4. Silva D,
    5. Pereira J,
    6. Margrido N,
    7. Martinez C
    : Evaluation of the number of goblet cells in crypts of the colonic mucosa with and without fecal transit. Rev Col Bras Cir 39: 139-145, 2012. PMID: 22664521.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Snover DC,
    2. Jass JR,
    3. Fenoglio-Preiser C,
    4. Batts K
    : Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a morphologic and molecular review of an evolving concept. Am J Clin Pathol 124: 380-391, 2005. PMID: 16191506. DOI: 10.1309/V2EP-TPLJ-RB3F-GHJL
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sheridan TB,
    2. Fenton H,
    3. Lewin MR,
    4. Burkart A,
    5. Donahue C,
    6. Frankel W,
    7. Montgomery E
    : Sessile serrated adenomas with low- and high-grade dysplasia and early carcinomas: an immunohistochemical study of serrated lesions “caught in the act”. Am J Clin Pathol 126: 564-571, 2006. PMID: 16938659. DOI: 10.1309/C7JE8BVL8420V5VT
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu C,
    2. Walker NI,
    3. Leggett BA,
    4. Whitehall V,
    5. Bettington M,
    6. Rosty C
    : Sessile serrated adenomas with dysplasia: morphological patterns and correlations with MLH1 immunohistochemistry. Mod Pathol 30: 1728-1738, 2017. PMID: 28752838. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.92
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Rex DK,
    2. Ahnen DJ,
    3. Baron JA,
    4. Batts K,
    5. Burke C,
    6. Burt R,
    7. Goldblum J,
    8. Guillem J,
    9. Kahi C,
    10. Kalady M,
    11. O'Brien M,
    12. Odze R,
    13. Ogino S,
    14. Parry S,
    15. Snover D,
    16. Torlakovic E,
    17. Wise P,
    18. Young J,
    19. Church J
    : Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel. Am J Gastroenterol 107: 1315-1329, 2012. PMID: 22710576. DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2012.161
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Torlakovic E,
    2. Skovlund E,
    3. Snover DC,
    4. Torlakovic G,
    5. Nesland JM
    : Morphologic reappraisal of serrated colorectal polyps. Am J Surg Pathol 27: 65-81, 2003. PMID: 12502929. DOI: 10.1097/00000478-200301000-00008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Torlakovic E,
    2. Gomez J,
    3. Driman D,
    4. Parfitt J,
    5. Wang C,
    6. Benerjee T,
    7. Snover DC
    : Sessile serrated adenoma (SSA) vs. traditional serrated adenoma (TSA). Am J Surg Pathol 32: 21-29, 2008. PMID: 18162766. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318157f002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Higuchi T,
    2. Sugihara K,
    3. Jass JR
    : Demographic and pathological characteristics of serrated polyps of colorectum. Histopathology 47: 32-40, 2005. PMID: 15982321. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2005.02180.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Fujimori T,
    2. Imura J,
    3. Sugai T,
    4. Yao T,
    5. Wada R,
    6. Ajioka Y,
    7. Ohkura Y
    : An assessment of the diagnostic criteria for sessile serrated adenoma/polyps: SSA/Ps using image processing software analysis for Ki67 immunohistochemistry. Diagn Pathol 7: 59-66, 2012. PMID: 22642724. DOI: 10.1186/1746-1596-7-59
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hisamatsu K,
    2. Noguchi K,
    3. Tomita H,
    4. Muto A,
    5. Yamada N,
    6. Kobayashi K,
    7. Hirata A,
    8. Kanayama T,
    9. Niwa A,
    10. Ishida K,
    11. Nakashima T,
    12. Hatano Y,
    13. Suzui N,
    14. Miyazaki T,
    15. Hara A
    : Distinctive crypt shape in a sessile serrated adenoma/polyp: Distribution of Ki67-, p16INK4a-, WNT5A-positive cells and intraepithelial lymphocytes. Oncol Rep 38: 775-784, 2017. PMID: 28627675. DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5725
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Fortuna D,
    2. Boman B,
    3. O'Neill R,
    4. Palazzo J
    : MCM2 expression in serrated polyps demonstrates aberrant cellular proliferation. Hum Pathol 63: 177-183, 2017. PMID: 28302537. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2017.02.020
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Rubio CA,
    2. Schmidt PT
    : Are non-dysplastic crypts with corrupted shapes the initial recordable histological event in the development of sporadic conventional adenomas? Anticancer Res 38: 5315-5320, 2018. PMID: 30194183. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12858
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Rubio CA,
    2. Schmidt PT
    : Crypts with corrupted shapes in non-polypoid adenomas. Anticancer Res 39: 833-838, 2019. PMID: 30711964. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13182
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Rubio CA,
    2. Schmidt PT
    : Disparate cell proliferation and p53-overexpression in colonic crypts with normal epithelial lining found below the neoplastic canopy of conventional adenomas. J Pathol Clin Res 5: 154-163, 2019. PMID: 30821124. DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.128
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Rubio CA,
    2. Schmidt PT
    : The normal epithelium of crypts accruing below nonpolypoid adenomas thrives with relocated proliferating cell-domains and p53-upregulated cells. Anticancer Res 39: 4965-4970, 2019. PMID: 31519602. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13685
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Humphries A,
    2. Wright NA
    : Colonic crypt organization and tumorigenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 8: 415-424, 2008. PMID: 18480839. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Samuel S,
    2. Walsh R,
    3. Webb J,
    4. Robins A,
    5. Potten C,
    6. Mahida Y
    : Characterization of putative stem cells in isolated human colonic crypt epithelial cells and their interactions with myofibroblasts. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296: C296-305, 2009. PMID: 19073897. DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00383.2008
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Singh SR
    1. Rubio CA
    : Putative stem cells in mucosas of the esophago-gastrointestinal tract. In: Stem cell, regenerative medicine and cancer. Singh SR (ed.). Nova Science Publishers Inc.: New York, Chapter 10, pp. 279-308, 2012.
  30. ↵
    1. Testa U,
    2. Pelosi E,
    3. Castelli G
    : Colorectal cancer: genetic abnormalities, tumor progression, tumor heterogeneity, clonal evolution and tumor-initiating cells. Med Sci (Basel) 6: 13-18, 2018. PMID: 29652830. DOI: 10.3390/medsci6020031
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Crespo M,
    2. Vilar E,
    3. Tsai SY,
    4. Chang K,
    5. Amin S,
    6. Srinivasan T,
    7. Zhang T,
    8. Pipalia N,
    9. Chen H,
    10. Witherspoon M,
    11. Gordillo M,
    12. Xiang J,
    13. Maxfield F,
    14. Lipkin S,
    15. Evans T,
    16. Chen S
    : Colonic organoids derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells for modeling colorectal cancer and drug testing. Nat Med 23: 878-884, 2017. PMID: 28628110. DOI: 10.1038/nm.4355
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Baker AM,
    2. Cereser B,
    3. Melton S,
    4. Fletcher A,
    5. Rodriguez-Justo M,
    6. Tadrous P,
    7. Humphries A,
    8. Elia G,
    9. McDonald S,
    10. Wright N,
    11. Simons B,
    12. Jansen M,
    13. Graham T
    : Quantification of crypt and stem cell evolution in the normal and neoplastic human colon. Cell Rep 8: 940-947, 2014. PMID: 25127143. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.019
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tóth B,
    2. Ben-Moshe S,
    3. Gavish A,
    4. Barkai N,
    5. Itzkovitz S
    : Early commitment and robust differentiation in colonic crypts. Mol Syst Biol 13: 1-15, 2017. PMID: 28049136. DOI: 10.15252/msb.20167283
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    1. Whetstone RD,
    2. Gold B
    : Quantification of colonic stem cell mutations. J Vis Exp 103: 53240, 2015. PMID: 26436534. DOI: 10.3791/53240
    OpenUrl
  35. ↵
    1. Goodlad RA,
    2. Lee CY,
    3. Wright NA
    : Cell proliferation in the small intestine and colon of intravenously fed rats: effects of urogastrone-epidermal growth factor. Cell Prolif 25: 393-404, 1992. PMID: 1391227. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2184.1992.tb01449.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Boman BM,
    2. Fields JZ
    : An APC: WNT counter-current-like mechanism regulates cell division along the human colonic crypt axis: A mechanism that explains how APC mutations induce proliferative abnormalities that drive colon cancer development. Front Oncol 3: 244-254, 2013. PMID: 24224156. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2013.00244
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Jagan IC,
    2. Deevi RK,
    3. Fatehullah A,
    4. Topley R,
    5. Eves J,
    6. Stevenson M,
    7. Loughrey M,
    8. Arthur K,
    9. Campbell FC
    : PTEN phosphatase–independent maintenance of glandular morphology in a predictive colorectal cancer model system. Neoplasia 15: 1218-1230, 2013. PMID: 24348097. DOI: 10.1593/neo.121516
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    1. Georgescu MM,
    2. Cote G,
    3. Agarwal NK,
    4. White C III.
    : NHERF1/EBP50 controls morphogenesis of 3D colonic glands by stabilizing PTEN and ezrin-radixin-moesin proteins at the apical membrane. Neoplasia 16: 365-374, 2014. PMID: 24862762. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2014.04.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Jass JR,
    2. Baker K,
    3. Zlobec I,
    4. Higuchi T,
    5. Barker M,
    6. Buchanan D,
    7. Young J
    : Advanced colorectal polyps with the molecular and morphological features of serrated polyps and adenomas: concept of a ‘fusion’ pathway to colorectal cancer. Histopathology 49: 121-131, 2006. PMID: 16879389. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2006.02466.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Parfitt JR,
    2. Driman DK
    : Survivin and hedgehog protein expression in serrated colorectal polyps: an immunohistochemical study. Hum Pathol 38: 710-717, 2007. PMID: 17391730. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.12.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Srivastava A,
    2. Redston M,
    3. Farraye FA,
    4. Yantiss R,
    5. Odze R
    : Hyperplastic/serrated polyposis in inflammatory bowel disease: a case series of a previously undescribed entity. Am J Surg Pathol 32: 296-303, 2008. PMID: 18223333. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318150d51b
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Wu JM,
    2. Montgomery EA,
    3. Iacobuzio-Donahue CA
    : Frequent beta-catenin nuclear labeling in sessile serrated polyps of the colorectum with neoplastic potential. Am J Clin Pathol 129: 416-423, 2008. PMID: 18285264. DOI: 10.1309/603UQKM7C2KELGJU
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sandmeier D,
    2. Benhattar J,
    3. Martin P,
    4. Bouzorene H
    : Serrated polyps of the large intestine: a molecular study comparing sessile serrated adenomas and hyperplastic polyps. Histopathology 55: 206-213, 2009. PMID: 19694828. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2009.03356.x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Ngo NT,
    2. Tan E,
    3. Tekkis P,
    4. Peston D,
    5. Cohen P
    : aDifferential expression of p53 and p504s in hyperplastic polyp, sessile serrated adenoma and traditional serrated adenoma. Int J Colorectal Dis 25: 1193-200, 2010. PMID: 20640432. DOI: 10.1007/s00384-010-1007-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Fujita K,
    2. Yamamoto H,
    3. Matsumoto T,
    4. Hirahashi M,
    5. Gushima M,
    6. Kishimoto J,
    7. Nishiyama K,
    8. Taguchi T,
    9. Yao T,
    10. Oda Y
    : Sessile serrated adenoma with early neoplastic progression: a clinicopathologic and molecular study. Am J Surg Pathol 35: 295-304, 2011. PMID: 21263251. DOI: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e318205df36
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tsai JH,
    2. Liau JY,
    3. Lin YL,
    4. Lin L,
    5. Cheng Y,
    6. Cheng M,
    7. Jeng Y
    : Traditional serrated adenoma has two pathways of neoplastic progression that are distinct from the sessile serrated pathway of colorectal carcinogenesis. Mod Pathol 27: 1375-1385, 2014. PMID: 24603588. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2014.35
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Ban S,
    2. Mitomi H,
    3. Horiguchi H,
    4. Sato H,
    5. Shimizu M
    : Adenocarcinoma arising in small sessile serrated adenoma/polyp (SSA/P) of the colon: clinicopathological study of eight lesions. Pathol Int 64: 123-312, 2014. PMID: 24698422. DOI: 10.1111/pin.12147
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Tamoto A,
    2. Yashima K,
    3. Hosoda K,
    4. Yamamoto S,
    5. Kawata S,
    6. Ikebuchi Y,
    7. Matsumoto S,
    8. Kawata S,
    9. Ikebuchi Y,
    10. Matsumoto K,
    11. Kawachi K,
    12. Harada K,
    13. Murawaki Y,
    14. Isomoto H
    : Protein expression of fragile histidine triad and cyclooxygenase-2 in serrated neoplasia of the colorectum. Oncol Lett 14: 3683-3688, 2017. PMID: 28927131. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6634
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 40 (3)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 3
March 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sessile Serrated Polyps Without Dysplasia Thrives With Asymmetric Relocation of Cell Proliferation-domains
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Sessile Serrated Polyps Without Dysplasia Thrives With Asymmetric Relocation of Cell Proliferation-domains
CARLOS A. RUBIO, PETER T. SCHMIDT
Anticancer Research Mar 2020, 40 (3) 1535-1542; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14099

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Sessile Serrated Polyps Without Dysplasia Thrives With Asymmetric Relocation of Cell Proliferation-domains
CARLOS A. RUBIO, PETER T. SCHMIDT
Anticancer Research Mar 2020, 40 (3) 1535-1542; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14099
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Asymmetric crypt fission in sessile serrated lesions
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Triage Process at Endoscopy With ColonView Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Will Enhance Diagnostic Accuracy (DA) of Colorectal Cancer Screening
  • Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery for Patients With Severe Chronic Heart Failure
  • Clinical Impact of Prehabilitation on Elective Laparoscopic Surgery in Frail Octogenarians With Colorectal Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • colon
  • sessile serrated polyps
  • non-dysplastic
  • cell proliferation
  • p53 up-regulated cells
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire