Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced Pediatric Malignancies

AGATA MARJAŃSKA, MONIKA DROGOSIEWICZ, BOŻENNA DEMBOWSKA-BAGIŃSKA, KATARZYNA PAWIŃSKA-WĄSIKOWSKA, WALENTYNA BALWIERZ, KATARZYNA BOBEFF, WOJCIECH MŁYNARSKI, AGNIESZKA MIZIA-MALARZ, ANNA RACIBORSKA, MARIUSZ WYSOCKI and JAN STYCZYŃSKI
Anticancer Research December 2020, 40 (12) 7095-7100; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14738
AGATA MARJAŃSKA
1Department of Pediatric, Hematology and Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun, Jurasz University Hospital, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: agata.marjanska@wp.pl
MONIKA DROGOSIEWICZ
2Department of Oncology, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BOŻENNA DEMBOWSKA-BAGIŃSKA
2Department of Oncology, The Children’s Memorial Health Institute, Warsaw, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATARZYNA PAWIŃSKA-WĄSIKOWSKA
3Department of Pediatric, Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WALENTYNA BALWIERZ
3Department of Pediatric, Oncology and Hematology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Cracow, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATARZYNA BOBEFF
4Department of Pediatrics, Oncology, Hematology and Diabetology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WOJCIECH MŁYNARSKI
4Department of Pediatrics, Oncology, Hematology and Diabetology, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AGNIESZKA MIZIA-MALARZ
5Department of Pediatric, Oncology, Hematology and Chemotherapy, Upper Silesia Children’s Care Health Centre, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNA RACIBORSKA
6Department of Oncology and Surgical Oncology for Children and Youth, Institute of Mother and Child, Warsaw, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIUSZ WYSOCKI
1Department of Pediatric, Hematology and Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun, Jurasz University Hospital, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JAN STYCZYŃSKI
1Department of Pediatric, Hematology and Oncology, Nicolaus Copernicus University Torun, Jurasz University Hospital, Collegium Medicum, Bydgoszcz, Poland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Nivolumab is an immune checkpoint inhibitor with high antitumor activity in selected neoplasms. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in pediatric patients with various types of highly malignant advanced tumors. Patients and Methods: Ten patients with a median age of 15.1 years were included in the study. The indications for treatment were: malignant skin melanoma (n=5), brain tumor (n=2), malignant melanoma of the brain (n=1), Hodgkin lymphoma (n=1) and soft tissue sarcoma (n=1). Results: Complete disease remission was observed in 4 patients. Overall survival at 24 months from diagnosis for the entire group was 0.36. Two patients receiving combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab did not achieve a remission. Adverse events of immunotherapy were observed in 4/10 patients. Conclusion: Nivolumab is a promising option in pediatric advanced malignancies. Treatment with immunotherapy was relatively well tolerated, and emerging side-effects were manageable.

Key Words:
  • Nivolumab
  • ipilimumab
  • anti-PD-1
  • pediatric cancer
  • malignant melanoma
  • brain tumor

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are one of the major advances of modern oncology, leading to improvement of overall survival (OS) of patients with advanced and refractory malignancies (1). Still, current experience with these drugs is limited in the pediatric setting.

Nivolumab is a human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor, and as a result it blocks the interaction between PD-1 and its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. Binding of the PD-1 ligands to the PD-1 receptor located on T lymphocytes surface, inhibits the proliferation of T cells and the production of cytokines (2). Immunotherapy with nivolumab is based on blockade of immune checkpoints, i.e. a group of costimulatory molecules negatively regulating the immune system. This blockade overcomes immune tolerance in the tumor microenvironment and amplifies antitumor immunity (3). About 50% of oncological patients with indications for treatment with nivolumab, may not benefit from monotherapy with this drug. To overcome this, a combination of nivolumab and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors is investigated as an approach to improve treatment outcomes (4). Ipilimumab is a humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody that inhibits CTLA-4. Anti-CTLA-4 antibody blocks CD80 and CD86 on antigen-presenting cells (APCs) forms binding to CTLA-4 on T lymphocytes. The resulting blockade of CTLA-4 signaling prolongs T-cell activation, restores T-cell proliferation, and thus amplifies T-cell-mediated immunity, which enhances the patient’s capacity to mount an antitumor immune response (1, 5).

Current indications for nivolumab +/– ipilimumab treatment include advanced forms of malignancies such as melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), renal cell carcinoma (RCC), classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) and urothelial cancer (6). The drug is licensed for adult patients only, however, research is ongoing focused on its effectiveness in the treatment of pediatric cancers. In addition, numerous clinical trials are currently underway to assess the safety and efficacy of PD-1 and CTLA-4 inhibitors in brain cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer and many other types of tumors (7).

The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab used as monotherapy or in combination with ipilimumab in a series of pediatric patients with various types of highly advanced malignancies given on compassionate-use basis.

Patients and Methods

Patients. Ten patients with a median age of 15.1 years (range=3.1-17.9 years) were included in the study. The indications for treatment with nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab were as follows: malignant skin melanoma in 5 patients, brain tumor in 2, primary malignant melanoma of the brain in 1, Hodgkin lymphoma in 1 and soft tissue sarcoma in 1. Patient characteristics are presented in Table I. No evaluation of PD-L1 expression in tumor cells was performed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics, dosage of drugs, and effects of treatment.

Therapy. All participants got immunotherapy as a life-saving therapy. Two patients additionally received ipilimumab. Details of treatment with nivolumab are presented in Table I. The applied doses of drugs were based on the recommendations for dosing in patients >18 years of age and were adjusted to body weight. All patients were treated between 15.12.2015-15.08.2020. Informed consent was obtained from the patients and/or their parents. The study was performed according to the institutional guidelines and was approved by the Institutional Review Boards.

Assessment of therapeutic response. The follow-up imaging examinations were performed every three months or when progression was suspected. Pseudoprogression, a response to immune therapy was defined as a reaction to treatment after first increase in size of tumors, caused by the infiltration of cancer tissue by immune cells. The rate of this phenomenon does not exceed 10% in individuals treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Due to the fact that classic response evaluation criteria for solid tumors (RECIST) should not apply for immunotherapy, separate criteria for treatment response have been established, based on immune related response criteria (irRC) and immunotherapy RECIST (iRECIST) (8). Follow-up of patients was based on irRC and iRECIST criteria.

Adverse events. All adverse events observed in patients were reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0.

Statistical analysis. The primary endpoint was the probability of overall survival (OS), calculated with the Kaplan-Meier method, and compared by the log-rank test. Event was defined as death from progression. Mean survival was determined by Kaplan-Meier method. The Cox regression model was used to calculate treatment outcomes for available risk factors [age, sex, primary diagnosis (skin melanoma vs. others), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status scale, and number of lines of previous therapy] in uni- and multivariate analysis. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). All the tests were two-sided. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. SPSS 25 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA) statistical package was used.

Results

Clinical course. Median follow-up of all patients included into the study was 9.6 (range=1.1-22.7) months. At the end of follow-up, complete remission (CR) was observed in 4 children, with a mean survival 11.1 (95%CI=5.2-16.9) months. Patients who survived received immunotherapy as a median 1 (range=1-3) line of therapy. Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma completed the treatment, and in three patients with malignant skin melanoma immunotherapy was still ongoing. All these patients received nivolumab monotherapy. A rapid progression of tumors was observed in 4 patients with poor general condition (ECOG ≥2) before the initiation of immunotherapy, largely impaired by numerous lines of prior treatment. The median number of nivolumab doses for children with observed progression was 4 (range=2-14).

Survival. Data on individual patient outcomes are shown in Table I. Probability of overall survival for the entire group at 24 months was 0.36 (Figure 1). Patients with ECOG ≤1 had OS=0.63 while all patients with ECOG≥2 died (p=0.006). Patients without previous lines of therapy presented a trend for better survival than those with ≥1 line of therapy (OS=0.67 vs. 0.17; p=0.056). Patients with skin melanoma had OS=0.53, while others 0.20 (p=0.135). Two factors (ECOG score and number of lines of previous therapy) were included in multivariate analysis. The only significant adverse risk factor was ECOG score ≥2 (HR=12.6; 95%CI=1.4-117; p=0.026).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overall survival: (A) for the entire group; (B) depending on ECOG score; (C) depending on number of previous lines of therapy; (D) depending on primary diagnosis.

Safety. Adverse events were observed in 4 out of 10 patients, presenting as hypothyroidism (2), pneumonia (2), diarrhea (1), blood hypotension (1), hepatotoxicity (1) and skin rash (1). Pseudoprogression was observed in one patient. One of the two patients on combination therapy with ipilimumab presented hypothyroidism, diarrhea and hepatotoxicity. All reported adverse events were manageable by delaying treatment for several weeks and/or steroid administration and did not lead to termination of immunotherapy.

Discussion

This study adds information to real-world data on the use of nivolumab for treatment of advanced pediatric malignancies. So far, such data are sparse. Davis et al. reported the results of a pediatric phase 1-2 trial on nivolumab monotherapy in 85 children and young adults with recurrent or refractory lymphoma and non-CNS solid tumors. The most common overall toxicities observed in the study were anemia (47%) and fatigue (37%). Responses were observed in patients with lymphoma (3/10 with Hodgkin lymphoma and 1/10 with non-Hodgkin lymphoma), but not in other cancer types (9). Besides, only several case reports of nivolumab and other anti-PD1 drugs use in children are available (10-15). More data exist on the treatment of adult patients.

In the study of 945 adult patients with stage III or IV of malignant melanomas, treated with nivolumab and/or ipilimumab, sustained 5-year OS was observed in 52% patients on nivolumab+ipilimumab, 44% on nivolumab alone, and 26% on ipilimumab alone (16). It seems that in our study group, immunotherapy was beneficial mainly for patients with advanced malignant melanomas of the skin. Complete remission rate of 60% in our melanoma patients was within the range of best outcomes in adults.

Momotow et al. analyzed the existing favorable efficacy and safety profile of PD1-blockade in the study of 30 relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma (r/r cHL) patients treated with nivolumab. They showed that a durable response after treatment with nivolumab might be achieved by consolidating stem cell transplantation (SCT) (17). Lepik et al. reported the results of experience with nivolumab in 99 adult r/r cHL patients. Complete response was achieved in 67.7% cases, and the response rate was comparable across two treatment groups: after autologous SCT (ASCT) and in ASCT-naïve patients (18). The results of the meta-analysis of 7 studies revealed that nivolumab increases the survival rate of patients with r/r cHL and its various histopathologic subtypes (19). In our study, one patient was treated for r/r cHL. Successful immunotherapy with nivolumab was preceded by treatment with brentuximab vedotin, and ASCT was performed in this patient after eight cycles of nivolumab. He is in complete remission 18-month from completing treatment.

Gorsi et al. analyzed 10 children (age 2-17 years) with refractory/recurrent brain tumors treated with nivolumab. Three patients (2 with high-grade glioma and 1 with CNS embryonal tumor) had a partial radiographic response to immunotherapy. PD-L1 expression status was assessed, and the median time to progression on nivolumab for PD-L1 positive individuals was 13.7 weeks, when compared with 4.2 weeks for PD-L1 negative patients (14).

Our study has obvious limitations. Even with this pediatric cases series, the number of patients was relatively low and heterogenous. We did not evaluate PD-L1 expression in tumor cells. Still emerging is the identification of a reliable biomarker or panel of targeting the PD-1 pathway in pediatric brain tumors and other solid tumors that can allow appropriate patient selection. Available data suggest that PD-L1 expression on tumor cells, an increased mutational burden and a strong lymphocytic presence in the tumor microenvironment, are significant but not yet definitive markers that predict its efficacy. These properties are variably present in some high-risk pediatric tumors, and support further research of PD-1-targeted therapy. Data from adult studies show that the presence or absence of these biomarkers does not guarantee the success or failure of this therapeutic strategy (20, 21). Although off-label use is tempting for individuals with recurrent or refractory cancers, caution should be taken in light of the still unproven benefit of these drugs for pediatric tumors, and the potential for organ toxicity related to immune effects. Trials are underway, which will better define the role these agents in pediatric cancers, either as single inhibitors or in combination with chemotherapy, radiation, or other molecularly targeted therapies (22).

The drugs were well tolerated, however there are some pitfalls of using nivolumab +/– ipilimumab immunotherapy, related to possible adverse events of immunological background, as well as infectious complications. In spite of relatively good efficacy, these drugs are not yet adopted as standard practice in pediatric oncology due to lack of clinical data and lack of clinical trials, related to rarity of pediatric cases. Still, the knowledge on the pharmacokinetics of new oncological medications in children is limited.

In conclusion, the treatment with nivolumab +/– ipilimumab is a promising approach in advanced pediatric malignancies. This immunotherapy is well tolerated and safe for pediatric patients, and side-effects are manageable. In our series best results were observed for patients with good performance status, no previous therapy, and skin melanoma. Since some clinical trials indicate a correlation between the PD-L1 expression on cancer cells and response to the PD-1 inhibitors, possibly limiting anti-PD-1 agent administration to the patients expressing PD-L1 may result in better therapeutic effect in pediatric tumors. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy of checkpoint blockade in pediatric setting.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to the study.

  • Authors’ Contributions

    Design of the study: AM, JS. Data collection and analysis: all authors. Manuscript writing: AM, MD, BDB, JS. Critical revision and final approval: all authors.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this study.

  • Received October 7, 2020.
  • Revision received October 26, 2020.
  • Accepted October 30, 2020.
  • Copyright © 2020 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Tarhini A,
    2. Lo E and
    3. Minor DR
    : Releasing the brake on the immune system: Ipilimumab in melanoma and other tumors. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 25(6): 601-613, 2010. PMID: 21204754. DOI: 10.1089/cbr.2010.0865
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Czarnecka AM and
    2. Rutkowski P
    : An update on the safety of nivolumab for the treatment of advanced melanoma. Expert Opin Drug Saf 19(4): 409-421, 2020. PMID: 32293935. DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2020.1757068
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Malesa A,
    2. Nowak J,
    3. Skórka K,
    4. Karp M and
    5. Giannopoulos K
    : Monoclonal antibodies against PD-1/PD-L1 pathway. Acta Haemat Pol 49(4): 207-227, 2018. DOI: 10.2478/ahp-2018-0025
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Rotte A
    : Combination of CTLA-4 and PD-1 blockers for treatment of cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 38(1): 255, 2019. PMID: 31196207. DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1259-z
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    1. Savoia P,
    2. Astrua C and
    3. Fava P
    : Ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4 Mab) in the treatment of metastatic melanoma: Effectiveness and toxicity management. Hum Vaccin Immunother 12(5): 1092-1101, 2016. PMID: 26889818. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2015.1129478
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    OPDIVO. Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/opdivo-epar-product-information_en.pdf [Last accessed on 29th October 2020]
  7. ↵
    Clinical trials. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results? cond=&term=nivolumab&cntry=&state=&city=&dist= [Last accessed on 29th October 2020]
  8. ↵
    1. Onesti CE,
    2. Freres P and
    3. Jerusalem G
    : Atypical patterns of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: Interpreting pseudoprogression and hyperprogression in decision making for patients’ treatment. J Thorac Dis 11(1): 35-38, 2019. PMID: 30863564. DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2018.12.47
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Davis KL,
    2. Fox E,
    3. Merchant MS,
    4. Reid JM,
    5. Kudgus RA,
    6. Liu X,
    7. Minard CG,
    8. Voss S,
    9. Berg SL,
    10. Weigel BJ and
    11. Mackall CL
    : Nivolumab in children and young adults with relapsed or refractory solid tumours or lymphoma (advl1412): A multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol 21(4): 541-550, 2020. PMID: 32192573. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30023-1
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  10. ↵
    1. Marjanska A,
    2. Galazka P,
    3. Marjanski M,
    4. Wysocki M and
    5. Styczynski J
    : Efficacy and toxicity of pembrolizumab in pediatric metastatic recurrent melanoma. Anticancer Res 39(7): 3945-3947, 2019. PMID: 31262925. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bose S,
    2. Robles J,
    3. McCall CM,
    4. Lagoo AS,
    5. Wechsler DS,
    6. Schooler GR and
    7. Van Mater D
    : Favorable response to nivolumab in a young adult patient with metastatic histiocytic sarcoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 66(1): e27491, 2019. PMID: 30270506. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27491
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Samoa RA,
    2. Lee HS,
    3. Kil SH and
    4. Roep BO
    : Anti-PD-1 therapy associated type 1 diabetes in a pediatric patient with relapsed classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Diabetes Care, 2020. PMID: 32616607. DOI: 10.2337/dc20-0740
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Foran AE,
    2. Nadel HR,
    3. Lee AF,
    4. Savage KJ and
    5. Deyell RJ
    : Nivolumab in the treatment of refractory pediatric Hodgkin lymphoma. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 39(5): e263-e266, 2017. PMID: 27841828. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000000703
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Gorsi HS,
    2. Malicki DM,
    3. Barsan V,
    4. Tumblin M,
    5. Yeh-Nayre L,
    6. Milburn M,
    7. Elster JD and
    8. Crawford JR
    : Nivolumab in the treatment of recurrent or refractory pediatric brain tumors: A single institutional experience. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 41(4): e235-e241, 2019. PMID: 30681550. DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000001339
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Ehlert K,
    2. Hansjuergens I,
    3. Zinke A,
    4. Otto O,
    5. Siebert N,
    6. Henze G and
    7. Lode H
    : Nivolumab and dinutuximab beta in two patients with refractory neuroblastoma. J Immunother Cancer 8: e000540, 2020. PMID: 32414861. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000540.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Larkin J,
    2. Chiarion-Sileni V,
    3. Gonzalez R,
    4. Grob JJ,
    5. Rutkowski P,
    6. Lao CD,
    7. Cowey CL,
    8. Schadendorf D,
    9. Wagstaff J,
    10. Dummer R,
    11. Ferrucci PF,
    12. Smylie M,
    13. Hogg D,
    14. Hill A,
    15. Marquez-Rodas I,
    16. Haanen J,
    17. Guidoboni M,
    18. Maio M,
    19. Schoffski P,
    20. Carlino MS,
    21. Lebbe C,
    22. McArthur G,
    23. Ascierto PA,
    24. Daniels GA,
    25. Long GV,
    26. Bastholt L,
    27. Rizzo JI,
    28. Balogh A,
    29. Moshyk A,
    30. Hodi FS and
    31. Wolchok JD
    : Five-year survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 381(16): 1535-1546, 2019. PMID: 31562797. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1910836
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Momotow J,
    2. Goergen H,
    3. Behringer K,
    4. Brockelmann PJ,
    5. Borchmann S,
    6. Tresckow BV,
    7. Kobe C,
    8. Engert A and
    9. Sasse S
    : Nivolumab in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma - extended follow-up of 30 patients treated within the checkmate 205 trial in a single-center. Hemasphere 3(5): e293, 2019. PMID: 31942546. DOI: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000293
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  15. ↵
    1. Lepik KV,
    2. Mikhailova NB,
    3. Moiseev IS,
    4. Kondakova EV,
    5. Tsvetkova LA,
    6. Zalyalov YR,
    7. Borzenkova ES,
    8. Babenko EV,
    9. Baykov VV,
    10. Markova IV and
    11. Afanasyev BV
    : Nivolumab for the treatment of relapsed and refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma after asct and in asct-naive patients. Leuk Lymphoma 60(9): 2316-2319, 2019. PMID: 30712423. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2019.1573368
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    1. Amraee A,
    2. Evazi MR,
    3. Shakeri M,
    4. Roozbeh N,
    5. Ghazanfarpour M,
    6. Ghorbani M,
    7. Ansari J and
    8. Darvish L
    : Efficacy of nivolumab as checkpoint inhibitor drug on survival rate of patients with relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma: a meta-analysis of prospective clinical study. Clin Transl Oncol 21(8): 1093-1103, 2019. PMID: 30739242. DOI: 10.1007/s12094-018-02032-4
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Ando K,
    2. Hamada K,
    3. Watanabe M,
    4. Ohkuma R,
    5. Shida M,
    6. Onoue R,
    7. Kubota Y,
    8. Matsui H,
    9. Ishiguro T,
    10. Hirasawa Y,
    11. Ariizumi H,
    12. Tsurutani J,
    13. Yoshimura K,
    14. Tsunoda T,
    15. Kobayashi S and
    16. Wada S
    : Plasma levels of soluble pd-l1 correlate with tumor regression in patients with lung and gastric cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Anticancer Res 39(9): 5195-5201, 2019. PMID: 31519633. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13716
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Inomata M,
    2. Kado T,
    3. Okazawa S,
    4. Imanishi S,
    5. Taka C,
    6. Kambara K,
    7. Hirai T,
    8. Tanaka H,
    9. Tokui K,
    10. Hayashi K,
    11. Miwa T,
    12. Hayashi R,
    13. Matsui S and
    14. Tobe K
    : Peripheral PD1-positive CD4 T-lymphocyte count can predict progression-free survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor. Anticancer Res 39(12): 6887-6893, 2019. PMID: 31810958. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13908
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Wagner LM and
    2. Adams VR
    : Targeting the pd-1 pathway in pediatric solid tumors and brain tumors. Onco Targets Ther 10: 2097-2106, 2017. PMID: 28442918. DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S124008
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 40 (12)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 12
December 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced Pediatric Malignancies
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced Pediatric Malignancies
AGATA MARJAŃSKA, MONIKA DROGOSIEWICZ, BOŻENNA DEMBOWSKA-BAGIŃSKA, KATARZYNA PAWIŃSKA-WĄSIKOWSKA, WALENTYNA BALWIERZ, KATARZYNA BOBEFF, WOJCIECH MŁYNARSKI, AGNIESZKA MIZIA-MALARZ, ANNA RACIBORSKA, MARIUSZ WYSOCKI, JAN STYCZYŃSKI
Anticancer Research Dec 2020, 40 (12) 7095-7100; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14738

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Nivolumab for the Treatment of Advanced Pediatric Malignancies
AGATA MARJAŃSKA, MONIKA DROGOSIEWICZ, BOŻENNA DEMBOWSKA-BAGIŃSKA, KATARZYNA PAWIŃSKA-WĄSIKOWSKA, WALENTYNA BALWIERZ, KATARZYNA BOBEFF, WOJCIECH MŁYNARSKI, AGNIESZKA MIZIA-MALARZ, ANNA RACIBORSKA, MARIUSZ WYSOCKI, JAN STYCZYŃSKI
Anticancer Research Dec 2020, 40 (12) 7095-7100; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14738
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • T-cell-based Immunotherapies for Haematological Cancers, Part A: A SWOT Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and Bispecific T-Cell Engagers (BiTEs)
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bone Toxicity Case Report Combining Encorafenib, Cetuximab and WNT974 in a Phase I Trial
  • Assessment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain Among Female Patients With Cancer: Knowledge, Management and Characterization in the IOPS-MS Study
  • Low-dose Apalutamide in Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Case Series
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • nivolumab
  • ipilimumab
  • anti-PD-1
  • pediatric cancer
  • malignant melanoma
  • Brain tumor
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire