Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Alpha-type-1 Polarized Dendritic Cell-based Vaccination in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma: A Phase II Clinical Trial

KOICHI MITSUYA, YASUTO AKIYAMA, AKIRA IIZUKA, HARUO MIYATA, SHOICHI DEGUCHI, NAKAMASA HAYASHI, CHIE MAEDA, RYOTA KONDOU, AKARI KANEMATSU, KYOKO WATANABE, TADASHI ASHIZAWA, YOSHIAKI ABE, ICHIRO ITO, TAKUMA OISHI, TAKASHI SUGINO, YOKO NAKASU and KEN YAMAGUCHI
Anticancer Research November 2020, 40 (11) 6473-6484; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14669
KOICHI MITSUYA
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
2Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUTO AKIYAMA
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
2Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: y.akiyama{at}scchr.jp
AKIRA IIZUKA
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HARUO MIYATA
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHOICHI DEGUCHI
2Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAKAMASA HAYASHI
2Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIE MAEDA
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYOTA KONDOU
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKARI KANEMATSU
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KYOKO WATANABE
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TADASHI ASHIZAWA
1Immunotherapy Division, Shizuoka Cancer Center Research Institute, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIAKI ABE
3Division of Blood Transfusion,, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ICHIRO ITO
4Division of Pathology, Nagano Red Cross Hospital, Nagano, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKUMA OISHI
5Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI SUGINO
5Division of Diagnostic Pathology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOKO NAKASU
2Division of Neurosurgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN YAMAGUCHI
6Office of the President, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is an intractable tumor that has a very poor prognosis despite intensive treatment with temozolomide plus radiotherapy. Patients and Methods: Sixteen newly diagnosed patients with high-grade gliomas were enrolled in a phase II study of the α-type-1 DC vaccine. Briefly, DCs obtained from the culture of enriched monocytes in the presence of a cytokine cocktail, were pulsed with a cocktail of 5 synthetic peptides and cryopreserved until injection into patients. Results: The amount of IL-12 produced by activated DCs was higher than that previously reported. Among 15 evaluable patients, 10 showed positive CTL responses to any peptides in an ELISPOT assay. After 6 years of observation, five patients were still alive, and two of these patients were relapse-free. Moreover, a significant survival-prolonging effect was verified in DC-treated glioma patients. Conclusion: Peptide-cocktail-pulsed α-type-1 DC vaccines have a potential therapeutic effect on survival when used in combination with the standard regimen, which is partly based on IL-12-IFN-γ-mediated T-cell activation.

  • Activated dendritic cell
  • immunotherapy
  • high-grade glioma
  • HLA-A24
  • phase II trial

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most malignant and intractable brain tumor that has a dismal prognosis; the median progression-free survival for primary glioblastoma is 6.9 months, and the median overall survival is 14.6 months, with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%, despite the use of intensive standard therapy consisting of radiation therapy and temozolomide (1-3). In addition, many diverse therapeutic regimens, such as cediranib (4), cilengitide (5), and rindopepimut (6), have been tested but they have failed to prolong overall survival. Bevacizumab and tumor-treating fields (TTField) had a marginal survival benefit in a randomized phase III trial (7, 8) but did not represent a therapeutic breakthrough against GBMs. Thus, novel therapeutic approaches to control GBM progression are urgently needed.

To date, many multiomics-based analyses of GBMs have been performed, and substantial literature regarding the specific genetic and biological characteristics of GBM tumors has accumulated including driver mutations (ERBB2, TP53, NF1, PTEN, mTOR, IDH1, etc.) (9, 10), activation of specific cancer signals (11, 12) and mesenchymal transformation signatures (c/CEBPb, STAT3). With advances in next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies, the specific association of the multiomic features of GBM tumors with the immune microenvironment has been examined; T cell dysfunction was associated with an exhaustion signature in GBM tissue, increased T cell infiltration was observed in mesenchymal type tumors and reduced infiltration of protumor macrophages was found in IDH1 mutant-harboring GBM tumors (13, 14).

In regard to immunotherapy of GBM tumors, immune checkpoint antibody-based clinical trials for the treatment of recurrent GBM tumors have indicated that nivolumab failed to greatly prolong the overall survival of recurrent GBM patients compared to bevacizumab (15). Additionally, a clinical trial using nivolumab for newly diagnosed GBM patients is ongoing (16).

Moreover, DC-based vaccine studies against GBM have shown moderate effects in terms of a patient performance status (PS) or quality of life (QOL), and some have demonstrated a marginal survival benefit; however, the impact of such approaches is still not obvious because of the weak vaccine effect and small numbers of cases enrolled in the clinical trials (17, 18). Recently, Liau et al. have reported an ongoing large phase 3 clinical trial of a tumor lysate-based autologous dendritic cell vaccine (randomized and multicentered) in newly diagnosed GBM patients for the first time, and suggested that the patients in the phase 3 trial were living longer than expected (19).

Previously, we have reported a phase I clinical trial of HLA-A2 or A24-restricted, peptide cocktail-pulsed DC-based, immunotherapy against recurrent high-grade glioma and demonstrated that activated DC vaccines were feasible and safe (20). Alpha-type-1 polarized DCs, activated by a combination of maturation reagents such as TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-α, IFN-γ and polyI/C, were manufactured in our cell processing facility.

In the present study, we performed a phase II study of an α-type-1 DC vaccine against high-grade gliomas to clarify the effects of DC vaccines on patient survival.

Patients and Methods

Patient characteristics and study design. Sixteen patients with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma were enrolled in a phase II clinical trial of a peptide cocktail-pulsed DC-based vaccine from 2013 to 2018 that was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Shizuoka Cancer Center, Japan. The present study was registered in the Japanese clinical trial data base (Japan registry of clinical trial (JRCT) ID: JRCT c040190103). All patients gave written informed consent. The eligibility and exclusion criteria were similar to those used for the previous phase I trial (20) except that DC-based vaccines were given to newly diagnosed high-grade glioma patients in combination with the standard regimen consisting of TMZ and radiation therapy (Figure 1). The minimum doses of corticosteroid were permitted for patients with neurological deficits due to mass effects caused by the lesions. The patients received 3 intradermal DC vaccines in the posterior neck weekly, and then they received vaccines twice every 2 weeks; finally, they received them every month for 5 months. The dose range of the injected DCs was 1~5×107/patient/shot. Adverse effects were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common toxicity criteria. Measurable lesions and clinical responses were evaluated by response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST). DC vaccines were continued until progressive disease (PD) was determined by immune-related (ir)RECIST and imaging diagnosis. The primary and secondary endpoints were the relapse-free survival time (RFS) and overall survival (OS) time, respectively, starting on the enrollment date.

With regard to overall survival, 16 registered patients were followed for 6 years until Oct 2019, and for the retrospective study, survival data from 45 high-grade glioma patients treated with a standard regimen from 2006 to 2011 were utilized.

Preparation of the DC vaccine. The methods used to produce the DC vaccine have been described previously (20). The procedures for preparing the DC vaccine were performed within a high efficiency particulate arrestance (HEPA)-filtered clean-air barriered good manufacturing practice (GMP) cell processing facility. A standard operation procedure (SOP) for DC vaccine production was established according to institutional GMP-based guidelines. Briefly, monocyte-enriched fractions were separated from leukapheresis products using OptiPrep™ and cultured in the presence of granulocyte macrophage-colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin (IL)-4 in X-VIVO15 serum-free medium. On day 5 of culture, TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-α, IFN-γ, and poly I/C were added to the culture to obtain mature DC-enriched cultures. On day 7, the harvested cells were pulsed with a cocktail of 5 glioma-specific synthetic peptides that were restricted to HLA A2 or A24, and then with keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH). The DC-enriched cells were washed and cryopreserved in a Cryocyte bag (Nipro Corporation, Osaka, Japan) until use. The percentage of DCs was determined as the lin-HLA-DR+ population (lineage antibodies including CD3, CD14, CD16, CD19, CD20, and CD56; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

IL-12p70 production assay. Cultured mature DCs were collected and incubated with the CD40 ligand-expressing mouse plasmacytoma cell line J558 for 24 h. Finally, the supernatants were collected and IL-12p70 levels were measured using an ELISA kit specific for human IL-12p70 (Endogen, Woburn, MA, USA).

Tumor antigen and HLA-class I expression detection in tumor tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections of primary high-grade gliomas were obtained from 16 patients. HLA class I and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression and tumor antigen expression were investigated using IHC as described previously (20). Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against human HLA class I (OriGene Technologies Inc., Rockville, MD, USA), PD-L1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), MAGE-A1 (Thermo Scientific, Flemont, CA, USA), MAGE-A3 (Abnova, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC), WT-1 (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), HER1 (DakoCytomation) and gp100 (DakoCytomation) were used as the primary antibodies. The staining was evaluated according to the percentage of tumor cells showing positive membranous staining as follows: score 0, less than 1%; score 1, 1 to 5%; score 2, 5 to 50%; and score 3, more than 50%. Regarding tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) staining, monoclonal antibodies against CD4 and CD8 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), FoxP3 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK, and CD204 (TransGenic Inc., Kobe, Japan) were used.

Glioma-associated marker gene and cytokine gene expression analysis using a quantitative PCR. Real-time PCR analysis of glioma-associated marker genes and cytokine genes was performed using a QuantStudio 12K Flex (Applied Biosystems, Foster, CA, USA) as described previously (21). Total RNA was isolated from resected tumor tissues, FFPE specimens or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) derived from patients administered the DC-vaccine. Briefly, PCR primers for glioma-associated genes (EGFR, ESA, GFAP, KLF4, NANOG, NES, OLIG2, Oct3/4, CD133, SOX2, transforming growth factor (TGF) BR2, VIM, FOSL2, C/EBP, YKL-40 (CHI3L1), and podoplanin (PDPN) for glioma markers; BCL2, Bcl-Xl, Survivin, Cyclin D1, c-Myc, VEGFR2, MMP9, TGFB1, TP53, VEGFA, and HIF-1alpha for STAT3 target genes and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and PCR primes for cytokine and chemokine genes (IL-2, IL-6, IL-10, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interferon (IFN)-γ, IL-12A, TGFB1, VEGF-A, colony-stimulating factor (CSF)-1, Natural cytotoxicity triggering receptor (NCR)1, CCL3, CCL4, CCL20, CXCL10, CXCR3, CCR7, CD62L, PD-1, TIM3, TCF7, TOX, CD127, Arginase1 (ARG1) and CD11B) were used.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Dendritic cell (DC) vaccine schedule. DC vaccines were prepared before the initiation of chemoradiotherapy through leukapheresis. After chemoradiotherapy (60 Gy plus concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) for 42 days at 75 mg/m2), DC vaccines were administered intradermally 10 times during 7 months together with TMZ maintenance therapy. Immunological monitoring, such as ELISPOT assays or DTH, was performed during DC administration.

ELISPOT assay. The ELISPOT assay was performed using PBMCs drawn prior to vaccination and after 4 DC injections as described previously (20). Briefly, on day 1, PBMCs were incubated in a 24-well culture plate and divided into nonadherent and adherent cells. Nonadherent cells were stimulated with adherent cells treated with a peptide cocktail twice in the presence of IL-2 and IL-7. On day 15, the responder cells were stimulated overnight with each peptide in a 96-well culture plate coated with anti-IFN-γ antibody. Finally, the positive spots stained with anti-IFN-γ antibody were measured using the KS ELISPOT system (Carl Zeiss AG, Overkochen, Germany).

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions. The HLA-A2 or A24 peptide solution and 50 μg/ml KLH were injected intradermally into the forearm and the immunological reactions at the injection site were measured regularly 4-times after the 1st DC injection.

Human plasma IFN-γ level after DC vaccine treatment. Human plasma IFN-γ levels were measured using a high-sensitivity IFN-γ-specific ELISA. Peripheral blood was drawn before and after the start of the DC vaccine trial (4-times in total) and IFN-γ levels were measured. The maximum IFN-γ level was determined after DC vaccine.

Statistical analysis. The relapse-free survival and the overall survival of high-grade glioma patients were examined by comparing the differences in the median survival time (MST) using the Kaplan-Meier method. A comparative analysis of the survival times between phase II patients and a retrospective historical control patient cohort was performed using the log rank test or the generalized Wilcoxon test. The association of clinicopathological factors and immunological factors with the overall survival data was analyzed using the log rank test. Additionally, the correlation of the genetic expression data obtained by real-time PCR of RNAs from glioma tumor tissues and PBMCs with the overall survival data was analyzed using a Pearson correlation test. Values of p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Malignant glioma patients' characteristic in phase II study.

Results

Patient characteristics. The patient characteristics are summarized in Table I. The sixteen newly diagnosed glioma patients, who consisted of 14 GBM (WHO grade 4-5) patients, 1 anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) (grade 3) patient and 1 anaplastic oligodendroglioma (AO) (grade 3) patient, represented 8 HLA-A2+ cases and 8 HLA-A24+ cases (Table I).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Phase II study of DC-based therapy against malignant gliomas.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Immunological monitoring in malignant glioma patients (Phase II).

DC processing and characterization. The CD14 percentage increased from 14.4±5.3% to 42.2±12.9% after Optiprep™ density-gradient centrifugation. The mean percentage of DCs identified as lin-CD11c+HLA-DR+ and the DC1/DC2 ratios were 50.6±12.9% and 99.2±147, respectively, which were not different from the values in the phase I trial (20). The percentages of DC markers, including CD83, CD80, CD86, DC sign, DEC205, CMRF56, etc. did not differ from those in the previous phase I report (20), which indicated that the obtained DCs showed a fully mature phenotype.

Regarding the IL-12 production assay, the amount of IL-12 produced from activated DCs was 3362±3798 pg/ml per 105 cells on average, which was significantly greater than that observed in the previous phase I study (20).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Potential prognostic factors involved in malignant glioma DC vaccines-1.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Potential prognostic factors involved in malignant glioma DC vaccines-2.

Clinical results and adverse effects. The mean injected DC number was 2.2×107/patient, the DC injection time was 8.8 on average, and 11 cases involved 10 injections. No severe side effects higher than grade III were observed. After 6 years of observation since the initiation of the study, five patients were still alive, and two of these patients were relapse-free. The relapse-free time and overall survival time (median) were 11.0 and 19.0 months, respectively.

Immunological monitoring. Regarding the skin tests, positive DTH reactions against peptide and KLH were detected in 4 cases (27%) and 9 cases (60%), respectively, in vaccinated patients (Table II). Ten of the 15 evaluable cases (67%) showed positive ELISPOT reactions against any tumor antigen peptides (Table III), and 9 cases responded to more than 2 peptides (positive peptides: 1.9±1.6 per case). The serum IFN-γ concentration measured with a sensitive ELISA kit was specifically increased in 6 cases (43%) to more than 10 pg/ml after the initiation of the DC vaccine trial (data not shown).

Characterization of HLA and tumor antigen expression and TIL status by IHC. An analysis of tumor antigen expression by IHC demonstrated that 15 cases showed evidence of at least one tumor antigen and that 12 cases (80%) exhibited more than 2 tumor antigens (Table III). HLA-class I protein was positive in all cases and 11 cases (68%) showed high expression levels with scores greater than 2. Meanwhile, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) staining revealed a low percentage of CD4+ T cells and a high percentage of CD8+ T cells and CD204+ macrophages (Table IV). PD-L1 and phosphorylated STAT3 expression were relatively low.

Glioma-associated gene expression in tumor tissues and cytokine gene expression in PBMCs detected by quantitative PCR. A real-time PCR analysis demonstrated that most glioma tissues showed GB-stem cell and mesenchymal phenotypes with high expression of CEBPB, CHI3L1, NANOG, NES, OCT4 and SOX2 (Figure 2), and that PBMCs from DC-vaccine-treated patients showed increase in T-cell activating cytokines (IFN-γ, GZMB, CD127) and chemokines (CCL4, CCL5, CCR5, CXCL10, CXCR3) (Figure 3). Additionally, the expression of the IFN-γ mRNA gene in PBMC from DC-vaccine-treated patients indicated a positive correlation with overall survival (Figure 4). However, glioma-associated mRNA gene expression in tumor tissues did not show any significant relationship with survival (data not shown).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Glioma-associated gene expression in tumor tissues detected by real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from tumor tissues or formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens. Each gene is presented as the summation of expression data from 15 cases and is indicated as the fold change in expression compared to that in normal astrocytes, which is rated as 1. A fold change of more than 2 was evaluated as positive, and the positive rate of the expression of each gene expression in 15 cases is shown at the bottom.

Association of survival with various clinical and immunological parameters. Besides PS and MGMT status, no clinical or immunological parameters showed any association with RFS or OS (Tables IV and V).

The correlation of the plasma IFN-γ levels with the IL-12 levels and the ELISPOT-positive peptide number. The correlation among three parameters (plasma IFN-γ level, IL-12p70 level and ELISPOT-positive peptide number) was investigated using a Spearman test. The maximum plasma IFN-γ level after DC vaccine administration had a positive correlation with IL-12 levels produced by activated DCs, but not the ELISPOT-positive peptide number (Figure 5). Moreover, the plasma IFN-γ levels showed no significant association with OS as shown in Table V.

Evaluation of RFS and OS in glioma patients registered in phase II study. After six years of observation since the initiation of the study, five patients were still alive, and two remained relapse-free. The RFS and OS (median) were 11.0 and 19 months, respectively; the RFS and OS (median) of the historical control group were 9.0 and 16.0 months, respectively. The RFS and OS analyses revealed a significant survival-prolonging effect in DC-treated glioma patients (p=0.024 in RFS, p=0.048 in OS, Figure 6).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Cytokine and chemokine gene expression in PBMCs from DC-treated patients using real-time PCR. Total RNA was isolated from PBMCs from patients [pre-DC vaccine and post-DC vaccine (4 times)]. The fold change in gene expression in the post DC vaccine PBMCs is shown compared to that in pre-DC PBMC, which is rated as 1. The open column shows pre-DC PBMCs (−); the closed column shows post-DC PBMCs (+). Each column represents the mean value of triplicate experiments. **p<0.01, *p<0.05, statistically significant.

Discussion

Since the development of immune checkpoint blockade therapy, novel effective combination immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO)-1 inhibitors or other small chemical compounds for the treatment of intractable solid cancers has been developed (22, 23). However, little success has been obtained. The next goal will be the maintenance or reinforcement of durable antitumor effects induced by ICIs for a long-term cancer control (23).

Dendritic cell-based cancer vaccines are one of the old technologies as cancer therapy regimens; however, they still show potential as immunotherapeutics despite the negative results obtained for sipuleucel-T (Provenge, Dendreon), an autologous cellular immunotherapeutic for treatment of prostate cancers, and for an anti-MAGE-A3 vaccine against advanced non-small cell lung cancers. Both have been evaluated in the context of phase III clinical trials.

Accumulating evidence has shown that IL-12p70-producing active DCs can have strong effects on TILs inside the tumor and exhibit very potent antitumor effect in an in vivo mouse model (24). Additionally, Okada et al. have demonstrated that IL-12p70-producing, HLA-A2 peptide-pulsed DCs, which are called α-type-1 polarizing DCs, showed antitumor effect and they obtained 2 objective responders and 9 patients with progression-free survival for at least 12 months in a phase I/II clinical trial involving 22 cases of HLA-A2+ high-grade glioma (25). Our group also reported a phase I clinical trial of HLA-A2 or A24 peptide-pulsed α-type-1 polarizing DC vaccines for the treatment of high-grade malignant gliomas in 2012 (20).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Association of cytokine and chemokine gene expression in DC vaccine-treated patient PBMCs with overall survival. After α-type-1 DC vaccinations (4-times), the IFN-γ mRNA gene expression levels in PBMCs significantly increased by several times (IFNG-1). Importantly, upregulation of IFN-γ mRNA in PBMC from DC-vaccine-treated patients showed a positive correlation with overall survival using a Pearson correlation test (IFNG-2).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Correlation of the plasma IFN-γ protein level with the level of IL-12 and the ELISPOT-positive peptide number. The correlation among the three parameters was analyzed using a Spearman correlation test. The levels of IL-12p70 in culture media and human plasma IFN-γ were measured using cytokine-specific ELISA kit. *p<0.05, statistically significant.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Evaluation of RFS and OS in high-grade glioma patients registered in the phase II study. The relapse-free time and overall survival time (median) were 11.0 and 19 months, respectively, and were compared with those of the historical control group (9.0 and 16.0 months, respectively). A comparative analysis of the survival times between phase II patients (red line) and the retrospective historical control patient group (black line) was performed using the log rank test or generalized Wilcoxon test. The relapse-free and overall survival analysis indicated a significant survival benefit for DC-treated high-grade glioma patients (p=0.024 in RFS, p=0.048 in OS). *p<0.05, statistically significant.

Recently, as the important mechanistic role of ICI in the immunological effect was determined, IL-12 production by activated DCs has received extensive attention (26-28). Garris et al. have demonstrated that the activation of antitumor T cells by anti-PD-1 antibody was not direct, but rather involved T cell-DC interactions mediated by IL-12 and INF-γ production (26). Additionally, Algazi et al. have reported that intratumoral IL-12 plasmid transfection combined with anti-PD-1 blockade enhanced TIL infiltration and sustained the IL-12/IFN-γ feed cycle, resulting in a stronger antitumor response in a clinical phase II trial of poorly immunogenic melanomas (27). Meanwhile, Greaney et al. have investigated the effect of intratumoral plasmid IL-12 transfection and found that the number of intratumoral PD-1+CD3+CD8+ tumor-specific T cells increased after treatment of cutaneous melanoma patients (28). Surprisingly, this observation was very similar to the results obtained in a previous study; injection of a high amount of IL-12-producing DCs (retrovirus-mediated) intratumorally into mouse B16F10 melanoma tumors effectively induced high accumulation of TILs (29).

Figure 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 7.

Alpha-type-1 active DC-initiated T-cell activation cycle. Activated effector T cells expressing CD40 ligand can stimulate α-type-1 DCs, which can produce a high amount of IL-12 after CD40-CD40 ligand binding, and IL-12 can activate naïve T cells that differentiate into effector and memory T cells, and repeat the cycle each time DCs are administered. TN: Naïve T cells; TE: effector T cells; TCM: central memory T cells; TEM: effector memory T cells.

In the current study, we hypothesized that the IL-12/IFN-γ cascade (Figure 7) in activated DCs and effector T cells acts as a key factor in the triggering and maintenance of potent antitumor activity initiated by high amount of IL-12-producing DCs. In turn, activated effector T cells expressing the CD40 ligand can stimulate α-type-1 DCs, which can produce a high amount of IL-12 after CD40-CD40 ligand binding, and IL-12 can activate naïve T cells that differentiate into effector and memory T cells to repeat the cycle each time DCs are administered.

As far as the IL-12/IFN-γ feed cycle reported by Algazi et al., which is a reasonable theory, the combination of α-type-1 DCs with anti-PD-1 blockade is considered to be worth investigating in a clinical trial of malignant glioma or other intractable solid tumors because our cascade theory is similar to the IL-12/IFN-γ feed cycle. IL-12 is well-known to stimulate antigen-specific effector T cells and promote antitumor response of Th1 type T cells. However, IL-12 may reduce the memory T cell population compared with the effector cell populations (30). Our quantitative PCR assay demonstrated that besides Th1-type effector T cell activation, CD127+CXCR3+ memory type T cells (central ~ effector memory T cells) were identified as shown in Figure 3. These results suggest that α-type-1 DCs might lead to the partial proliferation of central memory T cells and that some approach for maintaining memory T cells as precursors of effector T cells could be necessary for the reinforcement of the antitumor effect of DC vaccines (31).

Finally, long-term observation over 6 years revealed the survival benefit in terms of both relapse-free and overall survival in α-type-1 DC vaccine-treated glioma patients compared with those in glioma patients who did not receive DC vaccines as a retrospective historical control group. These observations are preliminary because of the study design and the small number of enrolled cases. However, secretion of a substantial amount of IL-12 from α-type-1 DCs probably induced the IFN-γ-mediated stimulation of Th1-type effector T cells involved in the tumor-specific ELISPOT response, which could contribute to the association with the overall survival benefit. Taken together, the results indicate that α-type-1 DC vaccines with the ability to induce high IL-12 production could be used in the future for combination immunotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 blockade for the treatment of intractable solid cancers including glioblastomas (32).

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank the staff at the Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital for their clinical support and sample preparation. This work was supported by the Shizuoka Prefectural Government, Japan.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this work.

  • Authors' Contributions

    KM and Yasuto Akiyama participated equally in the design of the study and drafting of the manuscript and were responsible for completing the study. AI, HM, Yoshiaki Abe and Yasuto Akiyama carried out apheresis and cell processing and were responsible for DC production. SD, KM and NH were responsible for the clinical work of the study including the collection of clinical samples. CM, RK, AK, KW, and TA participated in the design of the experiments and performed the biological assays. II, TO and TS contributed to the pathological diagnosis. YN and KY reviewed the manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final draft.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no competing interests in relation to this study.

  • Received September 4, 2020.
  • Revision received September 22, 2020.
  • Accepted September 23, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Stupp R,
    2. Mason WP,
    3. van den Bent MJ,
    4. Weller M,
    5. Fisher B,
    6. Taphoorn MJB,
    7. Belanger K,
    8. Brandes AA,
    9. Marosi C,
    10. Bogdahn U,
    11. Curschmann J,
    12. Janzer RC,
    13. Ludwin SK,
    14. Gorlia T,
    15. Allgeier A,
    16. Lacombe D,
    17. Cairncross G,
    18. Eisenhauer E,
    19. Mirimanoff RO
    : Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352: 987-996, 2005. PMID: 15758009. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa043330
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mirimanoff RO,
    2. Gorlia T,
    3. Mason W,
    4. Van den Bent MJ,
    5. Kortmann RD,
    6. Fisher B,
    7. Reni M,
    8. Brandes AA,
    9. Curschmann J,
    10. Villa S,
    11. Cairncross G,
    12. Allgeier A,
    13. Lacombe D,
    14. Stupp R
    : Radiotherapy and temozolomide for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: recursive partitioning analysis of the EORTC 26981/22981-NCIC CE3 phase III randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 24: 2563-2569, 2006. PMID: 16735709. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.5963
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. VEgvAry Z,
    2. DarAzs B,
    3. Paczona V,
    4. Dobi A,
    5. Reisz Z,
    6. Varga Z,
    7. Fodor E,
    8. CserhAti A,
    9. OlAh J,
    10. Kis D,
    11. BarzO P,
    12. HideghEty K
    : Adaptive radiotherapy for glioblastoma multiforme-The impact on disease outcome. Anticancer Res 40: 4237-4244, 2020. PMID: 32727750. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14425
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Batchelor TT,
    2. Mulholland P,
    3. Neyns B,
    4. Nabors LB,
    5. Campone M,
    6. Wick A,
    7. Mason W,
    8. Mikkelsen T,
    9. Phuphanich S,
    10. Ashby LS,
    11. Degroot J,
    12. Gattamaneni R,
    13. Cher L,
    14. Rosenthal M,
    15. Payer F,
    16. Jürgensmeier JM,
    17. Jain RK,
    18. Sorensen AG,
    19. Xu J,
    20. Liu Q,
    21. van den Bent M
    : Phase III randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cediranib as monotherapy, and in combination with lomustine, versus lomustine alone in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol 31: 3212-3218, 2013. PMID: 23940216. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.47.2464
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Reardon DA,
    2. Fink KL,
    3. Mikkelsen T,
    4. Cloughesy TF,
    5. O'Neill A,
    6. Plotkin S,
    7. Glantz M,
    8. Ravin P,
    9. Raizer JJ,
    10. Rich KM,
    11. Schiff D,
    12. Shapiro WR,
    13. Burdette-Radoux S,
    14. DROPCHO e,
    15. Wittemer SM,
    16. Nippgen J,
    17. Picard M,
    18. Nabors LB
    : Randomized phase II study of cilengitide, an integrin-targeting arginine-glycine-aspartic acid peptide, in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. J Clin Oncol 26: 5610-5617, 2008. PMID: 18981465. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.7510
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Weller M,
    2. Butowski M,
    3. Tran DD,
    4. Recht LD,
    5. Lim M,
    6. Hirte H,
    7. Ashby L,
    8. Mechtler L,
    9. Goldlust SA,
    10. Iwamoto F,
    11. Drappatz J,
    12. O'Rourke DM,
    13. Wong M,
    14. Hamilton MG,
    15. Finocchiaro G,
    16. Perry J,
    17. Wick W,
    18. Green J,
    19. He Y,
    20. Turner CD,
    21. Yellin M,
    22. Keler T,
    23. Davis TA,
    24. Stupp R,
    25. Sampson
    : Rindopepimut with temozolomide for patients with newly diagnosed, EGFRvIII-expressing glioblastoma (ACT IV): a randomized, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 18: 1373-1385, 2017. PMID: 28844499. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30517-X
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Batchelor TT,
    2. Reardon DA,
    3. de Groot JF,
    4. Wick W,
    5. Weller M
    : Antiangiogenic therapy for glioblastoma: current status and future prospects. Clin Cancer Res 20: 5612-5619, 2014. PMID: 25398844. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0834
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Stupp R,
    2. Taillibert S,
    3. Kanner A,
    4. Read W,
    5. Steinberg D,
    6. Lhermitte B,
    7. Toms S,
    8. Idbaih A,
    9. Ahluwalia MS,
    10. Fink K,
    11. Di Meco F,
    12. Lieberman F,
    13. Zhu JJ,
    14. Stragliotto G,
    15. Tran D,
    16. Brem S,
    17. Hottinger A,
    18. Kirson ED,
    19. Lavy-Shahaf G,
    20. Weinberg U,
    21. Kim CY,
    22. Paek SH,
    23. Nicholas G,
    24. Bruna J,
    25. Hirte H,
    26. Weller M,
    27. Palti Y,
    28. Hegi ME,
    29. Ram Z
    : Effect of tumor-treating fields plus maintenance temozolomide vs. maintenance temozolomide alone on survival in patients with glioblastoma: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 318: 2306-2316, 2017. PMID: 29260225. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.18718
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Verhaak RGW,
    2. Hoadley KA,
    3. Purdom E,
    4. Wang V,
    5. Qi Y,
    6. Wilkerson MD,
    7. Miller CR,
    8. Ding L,
    9. Golub T,
    10. Mesirov JP,
    11. Alexe G,
    12. Lawrence M,
    13. O'Kelly M,
    14. Tamayo P,
    15. Weir BA,
    16. Gabriel S,
    17. Winckler W,
    18. Gupta s,
    19. Jakkula L,
    20. Feiler HS,
    21. Hodgson G,
    22. James CD,
    23. Sarcaria JN,
    24. Brennan C,
    25. Kahn A,
    26. Spellman PT,
    27. Wilson RK,
    28. Speed TP,
    29. Gray JW,
    30. Meyerson M,
    31. Getz G,
    32. Perou CM,
    33. Hayes DN
    : Integrated genomic analysis identifies clinically relevant subtypes of glioblastoma characterized by abnormalities in PDGFRA, IDH1, EGFR, and NF1. Cancer Cell 17: 98-110, 2010. PMID: 20129251. DOI: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.12.020
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Carro MS,
    2. Lim WK,
    3. Alvarez MJ,
    4. Bollo RJ,
    5. Zhao X,
    6. Snyder EY,
    7. Sulman EP,
    8. Anne SL,
    9. Doetsch F,
    10. Colman H,
    11. Lasorella A,
    12. Aldape K,
    13. Califano A,
    14. Lavarone A
    : The transcriptional network for mesenchymal transformation of brain tumours. Nature 463: 318-325, 2010. PMID: 20032975. DOI: 10.1038/nature08712
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ikushima H,
    2. Todo T,
    3. Ino Y,
    4. Takahashi M,
    5. Miyazawa K,
    6. Miyazono K
    : Autocrine TGF-beta signaling maintains tumorigenicity of glioma-initiating cells through Sry-related HMG-box factors. Cell Stem Cell 5: 504-514, 2009. PMID: 19896441. DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2009.08.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. McFarland BC,
    2. Ma JY,
    3. Langford CP,
    4. Gillespie GY,
    5. Yu H,
    6. Zheng Y,
    7. Nozell SE,
    8. Huszar D,
    9. Benveniste EN
    : Therapeutic potential of AZD1480 for the treatment of human glioblastoma. Mol Cancer Ther 10: 2384-2393, 2011. PMID: 22027691. DOI: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0480
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Amankulor NM,
    2. Kim Y,
    3. Arora S,
    4. Kargl J,
    5. Szulzewsky F,
    6. Hanke M,
    7. Margineantu DH,
    8. Rao A,
    9. Bolouri H,
    10. Delrow J,
    11. Hockenbery D,
    12. Houghton AM,
    13. Holland EC
    : Mutant IDH1 regulates the tumor-associated immune system in gliomas. Genes Dev 31: 774-786, 2017. PMID: 28465358. DOI: 10.1101/gad.294991.116
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Park J,
    2. Kwon M,
    3. Kim KH,
    4. Kim TS,
    5. Hong SH,
    6. Kim CG,
    7. Kang SG,
    8. Moon JH,
    9. Kim EH,
    10. Park SH,
    11. Chang JH,
    12. Shin EC
    : Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced reinvigoration of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ T cells is determined by their differentiation status in glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 25: 2549-2559, 2019. PMID: 30659023. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-2564
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Filley AC,
    2. Henriquez M,
    3. Dey M
    : Recurrent glioma clinical trial, Checkmate-143: the game is not over yet. Oncotarget 8: 91779-91794, 2017. PMID: 29207684. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.21586
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    An investigational immune-therapy study of temozolomide plus radiation therapy with nivolumab or placebo, for newly diagnosed patients with glioblastoma (GBM, a malignant brain cancer) (CheckMate548) Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02667587 (Last accessed Sept 17, 2020)
  16. ↵
    1. Liau LM,
    2. Prins RM,
    3. Kiertscher SM,
    4. Odesa SK,
    5. Kremen TJ,
    6. Giovannone AJ,
    7. Lin JW,
    8. Chute DJ,
    9. Mischel PS,
    10. Cloughesy TF,
    11. Roth MD
    : Dendritic cell vaccination in glioblastoma patients induces systemic and intracranial T-cell responses modulated by the local central nervous system tumor microenvironment. Clin Cancer Res 11: 5515-5525, 2005. PMID: 16061868. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-0464
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Hilf N,
    2. Kuttruff-Coqui S,
    3. Frenzel K,
    4. Bukur V,
    5. Stevanovic S,
    6. Gouttefangeas C,
    7. Platten M,
    8. Tabatabai G,
    9. Dutoit V,
    10. van der Burg SH,
    11. Straten T,
    12. Martinez-Ricarte F,
    13. Ponsati B,
    14. Okada H,
    15. Lassen U,
    16. Admon A,
    17. Ottensmeier CH,
    18. Ulges A,
    19. Kreiter S,
    20. von Deimling A,
    21. Skardelly M,
    22. Migliorini D,
    23. Kroep JR,
    24. Idorn M,
    25. Rodon J,
    26. Piro J,
    27. Poulsen HS,
    28. Shraibman B,
    29. McCann K,
    30. Mendrzyk R,
    31. Löwer M,
    32. Stieglbauer M,
    33. Britten CM,
    34. Capper D,
    35. Welters MJP,
    36. Sahuquillo J,
    37. Kiesel K,
    38. Derhovanessian E,
    39. Rusch E,
    40. Bunse L,
    41. Song C,
    42. Heesch S,
    43. Wagner C,
    44. Kemmer-Brück A,
    45. Ludwig J,
    46. Castle JC,
    47. Schoor O,
    48. Tadmor AD,
    49. Green E,
    50. Fritsche J,
    51. Meyer M,
    52. Pawlowski N,
    53. Dorner S,
    54. Hoffgaard F,
    55. Rössler B,
    56. Maurer D,
    57. Weinschenk T,
    58. Reinhardt C,
    59. Huber C,
    60. Rammensee HG,
    61. Singh-Jasuja H,
    62. Sahin U,
    63. Dietrich PY,
    64. Wick W
    : Actively personalized vaccination trial for newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Nature 565: 240-245, 2019. PMID: 30568303. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0810-y
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    1. Liau LM,
    2. Ashkan K,
    3. Tran DD,
    4. Campian JL,
    5. Trusheim JE,
    6. Cobbs CS,
    7. Heth JA,
    8. Salacz M,
    9. Taylor S,
    10. D'Andre SD,
    11. Iwamoto FM,
    12. Dropcho EJ,
    13. Moshel YA,
    14. Waler KA,
    15. Pillainayagam CP,
    16. Aiken R,
    17. Chaudhary R,
    18. Goldlust SA,
    19. Bota DA,
    20. Duic P,
    21. Grewal J,
    22. Elinzano H,
    23. Toms SA,
    24. Lillehei KO,
    25. Mikkelsen T,
    26. Walbert T,
    27. Abram SR,
    28. Brenner AJ,
    29. Brem S,
    30. Ewend MG,
    31. Kuhagi S,
    32. Portnow J,
    33. Kim LJ,
    34. Lowdon WG,
    35. Thompson RC,
    36. Avigan DE,
    37. Fink KL,
    38. Geoffroy FJ,
    39. Lindhorst S,
    40. Lutzky J,
    41. Sloan AE,
    42. Schackert G,
    43. Krex D,
    44. Meisel HJ,
    45. Wu J,
    46. Davis RP,
    47. Duman C,
    48. Etame AB,
    49. Mathieu D,
    50. Kesari S,
    51. Piccioni D,
    52. Westphal M,
    53. Baskin DS,
    54. Ner PZ,
    55. Lacroix M,
    56. May SA,
    57. Pluard TJ,
    58. Tse V,
    59. Green RM,
    60. Villano JL,
    61. Pearlman M,
    62. Petrecca K,
    63. Schulder M,
    64. Taylor LP,
    65. Maida AE,
    66. Prins RM,
    67. Cloughesy TM,
    68. Mulholland P,
    69. Bosch ML
    : First results on survival from a large Phase 3 clinical trial of an autologous dendritic cell vaccine in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Transl Med 16: 142, 2018. PMID: 29843811. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-018-1507-6
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Akiyama Y,
    2. Oshita C,
    3. Kume A,
    4. Iizuka A,
    5. Miyata H,
    6. Komiyama M,
    7. Ashizawa T,
    8. Yagoto M,
    9. Abe Y,
    10. Mitsuya K,
    11. Watanabe R,
    12. Sugino T,
    13. Yamaguchi K,
    14. Nakasu Y
    : a-type-1 polarized dendritic cell-based vaccination in recurrent high-grade glioma: a phase I clinical trial. BMC Cancer 12: 623, 2012. PMID: 23270484. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-623
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ashizawa T,
    2. Iizuka A,
    3. Nonomura C,
    4. Kondou R,
    5. Maeda C,
    6. Miyata H,
    7. Sugino T,
    8. Mitsuya K,
    9. Hayashi N,
    10. Nakasu Y,
    11. Maruyama K,
    12. Yamaguchi K,
    13. Katano I,
    14. Ito M,
    15. Akiyama Y
    : Antitumor effect of programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade in humanized the NOG-MHC double knockout mouse. Clin Cancer Res 23: 149-158, 2017. PMID: 27458426. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0122
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Zhao S,
    2. Ren S,
    3. Jiang T,
    4. Zhu B,
    5. Li X,
    6. Zhao C,
    7. Jia Y,
    8. Shi J,
    9. Zhang L,
    10. Liu X,
    11. Qiao M,
    12. Chen X,
    13. Su C,
    14. Yu H,
    15. Zhou C,
    16. Zhang J,
    17. Camidge DR,
    18. Hirsch FR
    : Low-dose apatinib optimizes tumor microenvironment and potentiates antitumor effect of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade in lung cancer. Cancer Immunol Res 7: 630-643, 2019. PMID: 30755403. DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-17-0640
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Long GV,
    2. Dummer R,
    3. Hamid O,
    4. Gajewski TF,
    5. Caglevic C,
    6. Dalle S,
    7. Arance A,
    8. Carlino MS,
    9. Grob JJ,
    10. Kim TM,
    11. Demidov L,
    12. Robert C,
    13. Larkin J,
    14. Anderson JR,
    15. Maleski J,
    16. Jones M,
    17. Diede SJ,
    18. Mitchell TC
    : Epacadostat plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma (ECHO-301/KEYNOTE-252): a phase 3, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet Oncol 20: 1083-1097, 2019. PMID: 31221619. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30274-8
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Mailliard RB,
    2. Wankowicz-Kalinska A,
    3. Cai Q,
    4. Wesa A,
    5. Hilkens CM,
    6. Kapsenberg ML,
    7. Kirkwood JM,
    8. Storkus WJ,
    9. Kalinski P
    : α-type-1 polarized dendritic cells: a novel immunization tool with optimized CTL-inducing activity. Cancer Res 64: 5934-5937, 2004. PMID: 15342370. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1261
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Okada H,
    2. Kalinski P,
    3. Ueda R,
    4. Hoji A,
    5. Kohanbash G,
    6. Donegan TE,
    7. Mintz AH,
    8. Engh JA,
    9. Bartlett DL,
    10. Brown CK,
    11. Zeh H,
    12. Holtzman MP,
    13. Reinhart TA,
    14. Whiteside TL,
    15. Butterfield LH,
    16. Hamilton RL,
    17. Potter DM,
    18. Pollack IF,
    19. Salazar AM,
    20. Lieberman FS
    : Induction of CD8+ T-cell responses against novel glioma-associated antigen peptides and clinical activity by vaccinations with α-type 1 polarized dendritic cells and polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid stabilized by lysine and carboxymethylcellulose in patients with recurrent malignant glioma. J Clin Oncol 29: 330-336, 2011. PMID: 21149657. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.7744
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Garris CS,
    2. Arlauckas SP,
    3. Kohler R,
    4. Trefny MP,
    5. Garren S,
    6. Piot C,
    7. Engblom C,
    8. Pfirschke C,
    9. Siwicki M,
    10. Gungabeesoon J,
    11. Freeman GJ,
    12. Warren SE,
    13. Ong S,
    14. Browning e,
    15. Twitty CG,
    16. Pierce RH,
    17. Le MH,
    18. Algazi AP,
    19. Daud AI,
    20. Pai SI,
    21. Zippelius A,
    22. Weissleder R,
    23. Pittet M
    : Successful anti-PD-1 cancer immunotherapy requires T cell-dendritic cell crosstalk involving the cytokines IFN-g and IL-12. Immunity 49: 1148-1161, 2018. PMID: 30552023. DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.09.024
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Greaney SK,
    2. Algazi A,
    3. Tsai KK,
    4. Takamura KT,
    5. Chen L,
    6. Twitty CG,
    7. Zhang L,
    8. Paciorek A,
    9. Pierce RH,
    10. Le MH,
    11. Daud AI,
    12. Fong L
    : Intratumoral plasmid IL12 electroporation therapy in patients with advanced melanoma induces systemic and intratumoral T-cell responses. Cancer Immunol Res 8: 246-254, 2020. PMID: 31852717. DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-19-0359
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Algazi AP,
    2. Twitty CG,
    3. Tsai KK,
    4. Le M,
    5. Pierce R,
    6. Browning E,
    7. Hermiz R,
    8. Canton DA,
    9. Bannavong D,
    10. Oglesby A,
    11. Francisco M,
    12. Fong L,
    13. Pittet M,
    14. Arlauckas SP,
    15. Garris C,
    16. Levine LP,
    17. Bifulco C,
    18. Ballesteros-Merino C,
    19. Bhatia S,
    20. Gargosky S,
    21. Andtbacka RHI,
    22. Fox BA,
    23. Rosenblum MD,
    24. Daud AI
    : Phase II trial of IL-12 plasmid transfection and PD-1 blockade in immunologically quiescent melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 26: 2827-2837, 2020. PMID: 32376655. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-2217
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Akiyama Y,
    2. Watanabe M,
    3. Maruyama K,
    4. Ruscetti FW,
    5. Wiltrout RH,
    6. Yamaguchi K
    : Enhancement of antitumor immunity against B16 melanoma tumor using genetically modified dendritic cells to produce cytokines. Gene Ther 7: 2113-2121, 2000. PMID: 11223993. DOI: 10.1038/sj.gt.3301353
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Xiao Z,
    2. Casey KA,
    3. Jameson SC,
    4. Curtsinger JM,
    5. Mescher MF
    : Programming for CD8 T cell memory development requires IL-12 or type I IFN. J Immunol 182: 2786-2794, 2009. PMID: 19234173. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0803484
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Pham NL,
    2. Badovinac VP,
    3. Harty JT
    : A default pathway of memory CD8 T cell differentiation after dendritic cell immunization is deflected by encounter with inflammatory cytokines during antigen-driven proliferation. J Immunol 183: 2337-2348, 2009. PMID: 19635915. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901203
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Garg AD,
    2. Coulie PG,
    3. Van den Eynde BJ,
    4. Agostinis P
    : Integrating next-generation dendritic cell vaccination into the current cancer immunotherapy landscape. Trends Immunol 38: 577-593, 2017. PMID: 28610825. DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2017.05.006
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 11
November 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Alpha-type-1 Polarized Dendritic Cell-based Vaccination in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Alpha-type-1 Polarized Dendritic Cell-based Vaccination in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
KOICHI MITSUYA, YASUTO AKIYAMA, AKIRA IIZUKA, HARUO MIYATA, SHOICHI DEGUCHI, NAKAMASA HAYASHI, CHIE MAEDA, RYOTA KONDOU, AKARI KANEMATSU, KYOKO WATANABE, TADASHI ASHIZAWA, YOSHIAKI ABE, ICHIRO ITO, TAKUMA OISHI, TAKASHI SUGINO, YOKO NAKASU, KEN YAMAGUCHI
Anticancer Research Nov 2020, 40 (11) 6473-6484; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14669

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Alpha-type-1 Polarized Dendritic Cell-based Vaccination in Newly Diagnosed High-grade Glioma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
KOICHI MITSUYA, YASUTO AKIYAMA, AKIRA IIZUKA, HARUO MIYATA, SHOICHI DEGUCHI, NAKAMASA HAYASHI, CHIE MAEDA, RYOTA KONDOU, AKARI KANEMATSU, KYOKO WATANABE, TADASHI ASHIZAWA, YOSHIAKI ABE, ICHIRO ITO, TAKUMA OISHI, TAKASHI SUGINO, YOKO NAKASU, KEN YAMAGUCHI
Anticancer Research Nov 2020, 40 (11) 6473-6484; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14669
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Type 1-polarized DC immunotherapeutic contains heterogeneous populations with IL-12p70 production restricted to a rare subset
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Preoperative Serum Total Cholesterol Predicts Adjuvant Chemotherapy Completion After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer
  • The Prognostic Impact of Perioperative Inflammatory Status in Elderly Patients With Gastric Cancer
  • A Landscape of Immunogenomics Assessments for Endemic Burkitt Lymphoma: Relevance to Outcomes
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Activated dendritic cell
  • immunotherapy
  • high-grade glioma
  • HLA-A24
  • phase II trial
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire