Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge Versus 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Needles

DAANISH A. SIDDIQUE, MAHMOUD A. RAHAL, KAREN TREVINO, HOWARD H. WU and MOHAMMAD A. Al-HADDAD
Anticancer Research October 2020, 40 (10) 5845-5851; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.14603
DAANISH A. SIDDIQUE
1Internal Medicine Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAHMOUD A. RAHAL
1Internal Medicine Department, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAREN TREVINO
2Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Carmel, IN, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HOWARD H. WU
2Department of Pathology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Carmel, IN, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MOHAMMAD A. Al-HADDAD
3Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: moalhadd@iu.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Pancreatic mass sampling has historically been performed by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA). However, its sensitivity has been reported to be within a wide range, which limits its reliability. Fine needle biopsy (FNB) has been shown to have superior diagnostic performance and is increasingly replacing fine needle aspiration. In FNA, 25 gauge (G) needles appear to outperform 22G. Data comparing these sizes in FNB platforms is limited. We aimed to prospectively compare the performance of 22G and 25G Franseen-tip core biopsy needles in the sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Patients and Methods: Patients who underwent EUS-FNB of pancreatic lesions at the Indiana University Hospital using 2 needle sizes: 25G (Study group) and 22G (Control group) using the Acquire needle (Boston Scientific Co., Natick, MA, USA) were enrolled. Needle choice was left to the discretion of the endosonographer. Tissue specimens were evaluated onsite, and underwent touch and smear and cellblock preparation. Specimens were independently evaluated by 2 expert cytopathologists blinded to diagnosis. Cytopathologists assessed cytological yield (on smears) and histological yield (on cellblock) using a validated scoring system reached by a consensus among our cytopathologists as we have previously published. Results: A total of 75 patients (42 males, median=65 years) underwent EUS-FNB during the study period (2017-2018): 50 using 25G and 25 using 22G needle. Diagnostic yield was numerically higher in 25G (98% vs. 88%, p=0.105). Number of passes for smears were similar, however the 25G group required additional passes for cell-block (1.6 vs. 0.4, p=0.001). 25G was used more frequently for pancreatic head and uncinate process sampling (70% vs. 52%, p=0.126). Four patients had self-limited adverse events in the 22G group, but none in the 25G group. Conclusion: We report no difference in the diagnostic yield between 25G FNB vs. 22G sampling device with Franseen style tip, however, the 25G needle use was associated with the need of additional passes to collect a sufficient cell block.

  • Biopsy
  • fine-needle
  • large-core needle
  • pancreatic neoplasms
  • endosonography

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    D.A.S. performed the literature search. D.A.S. and M.A.H. conceived and designed the study. D.A.S., M.A.R., and M.A.H. interpreted the data. D.A.S., M.A.R., M.A.H., K.T. and H.H.W. collected the data, prepared and the edited manuscript. All Authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    Dr. Al-Haddad has received research and teaching support from Boston Scientific company. Drs. Siddique, Rahal, Trevino, and Wu do not have any conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

  • Received June 29, 2020.
  • Revision received July 18, 2020.
  • Accepted July 21, 2020.
  • Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved
View Full Text

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Purchase access

You may purchase access to this article. This will require you to create an account if you don't already have one.

patientACCESS

patientACCESS - Patients desiring access to articles
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 40 (10)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 40, Issue 10
October 2020
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge Versus 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Needles
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge Versus 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Needles
DAANISH A. SIDDIQUE, MAHMOUD A. RAHAL, KAREN TREVINO, HOWARD H. WU, MOHAMMAD A. Al-HADDAD
Anticancer Research Oct 2020, 40 (10) 5845-5851; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14603

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Sampling of Solid Pancreatic Lesions: A Comparative Analysis of 25 Gauge Versus 22 Gauge Core Biopsy Needles
DAANISH A. SIDDIQUE, MAHMOUD A. RAHAL, KAREN TREVINO, HOWARD H. WU, MOHAMMAD A. Al-HADDAD
Anticancer Research Oct 2020, 40 (10) 5845-5851; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14603
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • The Systemic Inflammation Score Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Esophageal Cancer Patients who Receive Curative Treatment
  • Impact of Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Following Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Therapy for Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Usefulness of Prophylactic Administration of Pegfilgrastim for Esophageal Cancer Chemotherapy: A Single-center Retrospective Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • biopsy
  • fine-needle
  • large-core needle
  • pancreatic neoplasms
  • endosonography
Anticancer Research

© 2022 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire