Abstract
Background/Aim: Very few studies are available about the biological activity of 3-styrylchromones. Our previous study demonstrated the importance of methoxy group at 6-position of the chromone ring and hydroxyl group at 4’-position of phenyl group in styryl moiety. As a sequel of this study, we synthesized fourteen compounds that include eight 3-styrylchromones where methoxy group was introduced at 7-position of chromone rings, and then evaluated their tumor-specificity. Materials and Methods: Tumor-specificity (TS) was calculated by relative cytotoxicity against human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell lines versus human normal oral cells. Apoptosis induction and growth arrest were monitored by cell-cycle analysis. Quantitative structure–activity relationship analysis of TS was performed with 3,167 chemical descriptors. Results and Discussion: Two compounds, 7-methoxy-3-[(1E)-2-phenylethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [7] and 3-[(1E)-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [14] showed higher tumor-specificity than doxorubicin and 5-FU, suggesting the importance of methoxy group in 7-position of the chromone ring. These compounds induced the apoptosis and mitotic arrest in HSC-2 cells. The tumor-specificity of 3-styrylchromone derivatives were most correlated with descriptors for molecule shape and electronic charge. The present study suggested that modification by introducing methoxy group at 7-position, instead at 6-position, further increased the tumor-specificity of 3-styrylchromone.
- 3-Styrylchromones
- methoxy group
- cytotoxicity
- tumor-specificity
- QSAR analysis
- cell cycle analysis
- molecular shape
Chromone is a two-ring backbone structure contained in many flavonoids. 3-Chromone is a compound that has a styryl group attached at 3-position of chromone. We previously reported that (E)-3-(4-hydroxystyryl)-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one (compound A) showed approximately 69-fold higher cytotoxicity against human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cell lines as compared with human normal oral cells (1). On the other hand, natural polyphenols such as tannins and flavonoids showed only marginal tumor-specificity (2, 3). As far as we are aware, only five studies of biological activities of 3-styrylchromone derivatives have been reported so far. This includes antimicrobial activity (4), anti-picornavirus activity (5), free radical scavenging and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity (6), apoptosis induction (7) and tumor-specificity (1).
Quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis demonstrated the importance of methoxy group at 6-position of the chromone ring and hydroxyl group at 4’-position of phenyl group in styryl moiety (1). As a sequel of this study, we synthesized fourteen compounds that include eight 3-styrylchromones where methoxy group was introduced at 7-position of chromone ring, and then evaluated the tumor-specificity. We first investigated their cytotoxicity against four human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) cells lines (Ca9-22, derived from gingival tissue; HSC-2, HSC-3. HSC-4, derived from tongue) and three human normal oral mesenchymal cells [human gingival fibroblast (HGF), human periodontal ligamental fibroblast (HPLF) and human pulp cells (HPC)], and then performed QSAR analysis.
Materials and Methods
Materials. Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM) was purchased from GIBCO BRL (Grand Island, NY, USA); fetal bovine serum (FBS), doxorubicin, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), ribonuclease A from Sigma-Aldrich Inc. (St. Louis, MO, USA); dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), actinomycin D (FUJIFILM Wako Chem., Osaka, Japan); 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) from Kyowa (Tokyo, Japan); 100 mm dishes from True Line (Nippon Genetics Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and 96-well plates from TPP (Techno Plastic Products AG, Trasadingen, Switzerland).
Synthesis of 3-Styrylchromones. Synthesis of test compounds. 3-[(1E)-2-Phenylethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [1], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [2], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [3], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-dimethyaminophenyl)ethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [4], 6-methoxy-3-[(1E)-2-phenylethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [5], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-dimethyaminophenyl)ethenyl]-6-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [6], 7-methoxy-3-[(1E)-2-phenylethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [7], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-fluorophenyl)ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [8], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-chlorophenyl)ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [9], 3-[(1E)-2-(4-dimethyaminophenyl)ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [10], 7-methoxy-3-[(1E)-2-(4-methoxyphenyl) ethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [11], 3-[(1E)-2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl) ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [12], 7-methoxy-3-[(1E)-2-(3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl)ethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [13] and 3-[(1E)-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [14] were synthesized by Knoevenagel condensation of the appropriate 3-formylchromone with selected phenylacetic acid derivatives, according to previous methods (6). The compounds' structure is shown in Figure 1. All compounds were dissolved in DMSO at 40 mM and stored at −20°C before use.
Cell culture. Human OSCC cell lines (Ca9-22, HSC-2, HSC-3. HSC-4) and human normal oral mesenchymal cells (HGF, HPLF, HPC) (established in the Meikai University) at 10-18 population doubling levels were cultured at 37°C in DMEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 U/ml, penicillin G and 100 μg/ml streptomycin sulfate under a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere, as described previously (7, 8).
Assay for cytotoxic activity. Cells were inoculated at 6×103 cells/cm2 in a 96-microwell plate. After 48 h, the medium was replaced with fresh medium containing various concentrations of 3-styrylchromones (0.3, 0.6, 1.3, 3.1, 6.3, 12.5, 25, 50, 100, 200 or 400 μM), doxorubicin (0.078, 0.16, 0.31, 0.63, 1.25, 2.5, 5 or 10 μM) or 5-FU (7.8, 16, 31, 63, 125, 250, 500 or 1,000 μM). Cells were incubated for 48 h and the relative viable cell number was then determined in triplicate by the MTT method, as described previously (7, 8). Control cells were treated with the same amounts of DMSO and the cell damage induced by DMSO was subtracted. The concentration of compound that reduced the viable cell number by 50% (CC50) was determined from the dose–response curve.
Calculation of tumor-specificity index (TS). TS was calculated by the following equation: TS= Mean CC50 (HGF + HPLF + HPC)/meanCC50 (Ca9-22 + HSC-2 + HSC-3 + HSC-4) (D/B) or CC50 (HGF)/CC50 (Ca9-22) [both derived from gingival tissue (9)] (C/A in Table I).
Calculation of potency-selectivity expression (PSE). PSE, that is the product of tumor-specificity and cytotoxicity against tumor cells, was calculated by the following equation: PSE={Mean CC50 (normal cells)/[mean CC50 (OSCC cell lines)]2} ×100 [as shown in (D/B2) ×100 or (C/A2) ×100, Table I].
Cell-cycle analysis. Treated and untreated cells (approximately 106 cells) were harvested from 100 mm dish, fixed, treated with ribonuclease A, stained with propidium iodide, filtering through cell strainers and then subjected to cell sorting and cell-cycle analysis with Cell Sorter Software version 2.1.2. (SONY Imaging Products and Solution Inc., Tokyo, Japan), as described previously (8).
Estimation of CC50 values for computational analysis. The negative log CC50 (pCC50) values for the comparison of cytotoxicity between compounds, as described previously (8). The mean pCC50 values for normal cells and tumor cell lines were defined as N and T, respectively. The difference (T–N) was used as a tumor-specificity index.
Calculation of chemical descriptors. The 3D structure of each chemical structure (MarvinSketch 18.10.0, ChemAxon, Budapest, Hungary) (10), was optimized by CORINA Classic (Molecular Networks GmbH, Germany) (11) with forcefield calculations (amber-10: EHT) in Molecular Operating Environment (MOE) version 2019.0101 (Chemical Computing Group Inc., Quebec, Canada) (12). The number of structural descriptors calculated from MOE and Dragon (Dragon 7 version 7.0.2 (Kode srl., Pisa, Italy) (13) was 354 and 5,255, respectively. As a result of excluding descriptors with a standard deviation of 0, the number of descriptors used in this study was reduced to 307 in MOE and 2,860 in Dragon (Total: 3,167), respectively.
Statistical treatment. The CC50 values were expressed as mean±S.D. of triplicate assays. The relation among cytotoxicity, tumor-specificity index and chemical descriptors was investigated using simple regression analyses by JMP®Pro version 14.3.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) (14). The significance level was set at p<0.05.
Results
Cytotoxicity and tumor-specificity. Among fourteen synthetic 3-styrylchromone derivatives, [7] showed the highest cytotoxicity against four OSCC cell lines (mean CC50=0.60 μM) (B in Table I), followed by [14] (0.65) > [8] (1.1) > [3] (5.3) > [6] (6.5) > [4] (14.8) > [2, 12] (20.0) > [11] (21.3) > [13] (30.0) > [10] (34.2) > [9] (70.8) > [5] (83.1) > [1] (145.6 μM). On the other hand, [3] showed the highest cytotoxicity against three normal oral mesenchymal cells (mean CC50=3.7 μM) (D in Table I), followed by [8] (4.1) > [6] (6.1) > [2] (22.9) > [5] (64.0) > [13] (91.8) > [14] (118.8) > [11] (132.6) > [4] (143.5) > [10] (156.5) > [9] (171.6) > [7] (181.9) > [12] (183.0) > [1] (334.0 μM) (Table I).
When tumor-specificity (TS) was calculated by the ratio of mean CC50 for normal oral cells to that of OSCC cells (D/B in Table I), [7] showed the highest TS value (301.1), followed by [14] (182.0) > [4] (9.7) > [12] (9.2) > [11] (6.2) > [10] (4.6) > [8] (3.7) > [13] (3.1) > [9] (2.4) > [1] (2.3) > [2] (1.1) > [6] (0.9) > [5] (0.8) > [3] (0.7).
The derivative [7] also showed the highest PSE value [(D/B2)x100 in Table I] (49842.4), followed by [14] (27898.1) > [8] (346.2) > [4] (65.6) > [12] (45.9) > [11] (29.1) > [6] (14.2) > [10] (13.4) > [3] (13.3) > [13] (10.2) > [2] (5.7) > [9] (3.4) > [1] (1.6) > [5] (0.9). The prominent TS and PSE values of [7, 14] were again observed when Ca9-22 and HGF (both derived from gingival tissue) were used: 754.7, 445.0 (C/A) and 142399.4, 69899.4 [(C/A2) ×100 in Table I], respectively. Dose-response curves (Figure 2A and B) showed clearly that all OSCC cells (Ca9-22, HSC-2, HSC-3, HSC-4) were more sensitive to [7, 14] than normal oral cells (HGF, HPLF, HPC). It should be noted that TS and PSE values of [7, 14] were higher than doxorubicin (TS=54.9, 45.5: PSE=24953.8, 20661.2) and 5-FU (TS=16.2, 26.5; PSE=26.2, 70.5) (Table I).
Cell-cycle analysis (Figure 3) demonstrated that both [7, 14] as well as actinomycin D induced subG1 population, suggesting the apoptosis induction. It should be noted that [7, 14], but not actinomycin D, induced G2+M phase arrest.
Computational analysis. QSAR analysis of cytotoxicity and tumor-specificity of fourteen 3-styrylchromone derivatives [1-14] were next performed. Since a significant correlation (p<0.05) was found between cytotoxicity against tumor and normal cells, and TS with 2, 12 and 69 chemical descriptors (data not shown), top two or six chemical descriptors were chosen for QSAR analysis (Figures 4, 5 and 6, and Table II).
The cytotoxicity of 3-styrylchromone derivatives [1-14] against human OSCC cell lines was correlated positively with PJI3 (3D shape and size) (r2=0.470, p=0.0068) while negatively with CIC1 (topological shape) (r2=0.307, p=0.0398) (Figure 4)
The cytotoxicity of 3-styrylchromones [1-14] against normal oral cells was correlated positively with Petitjean (topological shape and size) (r2=0.373, p=0.0203), SpMAD_AEA(dm) (topological shape and dipole moment) (r2=0.363, p=0.0226), BIC0 (topological shape) (r2=0.321, p=0.0346) and JGI8 (topological shape and electric state) (r2=0.306, p=0.0402), while negatively with MATS4s (topological shape and electric state) (r2=0.321, p=0.0348) and MATS4e (topological shape and electric state) (r2=0.319, p=0.0355) (Figure 5).
The TS of fourteen 3-styrylchromones [1-14] was correlated positively with MATS4e (topological shape and electric state) (r2=0.414, p=0.0131), H8s (3D shape) (r2=0.404, p=0.0145), MNDO_LUMO (energy of the LUMO) (r2=0.391, p=0.0168), and H8e (3D shape and electric state) (r2=0.343, p=0.0276), while negatively with AROM (aromaticity index) (r2=0.349, p=0.0259), FASA_H (3D shape, size and partial charges) (r2=0.346, p=0.0269) (Figure 6).
Tumor-specificity of [1-14] was reduced by the presence of methoxy group at R1 (6-position of chromone ring), but increased by the presence of methoxy group at R2 (7-position of chromone ring) (Figure 7).
Discussion
The present study demonstrated that compounds 7-methoxy-3-[(1E)-2-phenylethenyl]-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [7] (TS=301.1 in D/B, 754.7 in C/A; PSE= 49842.4 in 100 × D/B2, 142399.4 in 100 × C/A2) and 3-[(1E)-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)ethenyl]-7-methoxy-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one [14] (TS=182.0, 445.0; PSE=27898.1, 69899.4) showed higher tumor-specificity than with doxorubicin (TS=54.9, 45.5; PSE=24953.8, 20661.2) and 5-FU (TS=16.2, 26.5; 26.2, 70.5) (Table I). This suggests the antitumor potential of [7, 14].
We previously reported that (E)-3-(4-hydroxystyryl)-6-methoxy-4H-chromen-4-one (compound A) that have methoxy group at 6-position of the chromone ring and hydroxyl group at 4’-position of phenyl group in styryl moiety showed excellent tumor-specificity [TS=69.0 in D/B, 31.9 in C/A) (1); PSE=3,450 in 100 × D/B2] (7). We found that [14] (TS=182.0) with methoxy group at 7-position showed higher tumor-specificity than compound A with methoxy group at 6-position (TS=69.0) (1). Similarly, the most potent compound [7] (TS=301.1) has methoxy group at 7-position and non-substituted styryl moiety, and replacing the methoxy group to 6-position yielded [5] with much reduced tumor-specificity (TS=0.8). This suggests that the introduction of methoxy group at 7-position is involved in the elevation of tumor-specificity.
QSAR analysis demonstrated that the cytotoxicity of 3-styrylchromone derivatives [1-14] against OSCC cell lines was correlated positively with 3D and topological shape, and size (Figure 4). Their cytotoxicity against normal cells was correlated with topological shape and size, dipole moment and electric state (Figure 5). Their TS was correlated with 3D and topological shape, size, electric state, energy of the LUMO, aromaticity index and partial charges (Figure 6).
The present study also demonstrated that both [7, 14] produced a subG1 cell population (a marker of apoptosis), and induced the accumulation at G2+M phase cells in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line HSC-2 (Figure 3). It has been reported recently that 4’-methoxy-2-styrylchromone induced mitotic arrest in human tumor (human Caucasian breast adenocarcinoma MCF-7 and human lung adenocarcinoma NCI-H460) cell lines, in a similar fashion to paclitaxel (15). It remains to be investigated whether mitotic arrest is common phenomenon after treatment with either 2-styrylchromon or 3-styrylchromone.
It should be noted that both [7, 14] induced apoptosis (subG1 population) of HSC-2 cells to comparable extent that attained by actinomycin D, positive control used in this study (16). Induction of both apoptosis and G2+M arrest may further potentiate the antitumor potential.
We found that TS value (D/B in Table I) of two 3-styrylchromones [7, 14] (TS=301.1, 182.0) is much higher than the maximum TS values of 3-(N-cyclicamino)chromones (TS=12.3) (17), pyrano[4,3-b]chromones (TS=47.8) (18), 2-arylazolylchromones and 2-triazolylchromones (TS=21.2) (19) and 2-styrylchromones (TS=89.1) (20). This suggests that [7, 14] can be lead compounds for designing new types of anticancer drugs.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (15K08111, 16K11519).
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
K.T., K.H. and Y.S. synthesized 3-styrylchoromones, H.S. and HX.S. performed cytotoxicity assay. K.B., A.T. and M.T. performed cell cycle analysis. J.N. and Y.U. performed QSAR analysis. K.T., H.S., Y.S., Y.U., A.T and M.T. authored and reviewed drafts of the article.
This article is freely accessible online.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors wish to confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome.
- Received November 20, 2019.
- Revision received November 26, 2019.
- Accepted December 2, 2019.
- Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved