Abstract
Background/Aim: Bile leakage after liver surgery is still a problem to be solved. Here, we introduce a simple new technique, the Clip on Staple method, a preventive measure for bile leakage after anatomical liver resection using a stapling device. Patients and Methods: Before liver parenchymal transection, the roots of Glissonean pedicles for target segments were dissected and divided using the Endo-GIA™ Tri-Staple™ Curved Tip. After the parenchymal transection was completed, the full length of the stapled stump was reinforced by multiple clips. The DS Titanium Ligation Clip was used as the clipping device. Results: Twenty patients underwent this technique during anatomical liver resections with stapling devices. No patient developed postoperative bile leakage of any grade. There was no reoperation or readmission within 90 days. Conclusion: The Clip on Staple method is simple and offers a preventive effect for postoperative bile leakage after anatomical liver resection using stapling devices.
Despite significant technical advancements in the field of liver surgery, bile leakage remains a significant postoperative morbidity (1, 2). Bile leakage is associated with subsequent severe complications such as intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis, and sepsis. With the recent trend toward minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery, stapling devices have been introduced as a measure for division of the Glissonean pedicles or the hepatic veins (3-5). Although stapling device offers a simple and uniform quality of closure for every surgeon, it also carries the risk of malfunction (6-8). Actually, bile leakage from the staple line is occasionally encountered (4, 9). In the case of anatomical liver resection, most of the leakage points are observed around the hilar Glissonean stump and not at the peripheral parenchymal cutting plane, because parenchymal resection is usually performed along the intersegmental plane.
We presumed that some bile leakage after anatomical liver resection using stapling devices was attributable to stapler malfunction and the subsequent delayed loosening of the stapled stump. Based on this hypothesis, we devised a new, simple technique, the Clip on Staple method, a preventive measure for postoperative bile leakage after anatomical liver resection using stapling devices. In this report, we present our initial results of 20 patients who underwent our new technique in anatomical liver resection using stapling devices.
Patients and Methods
Patients. Among 85 patients who underwent liver resection at our institution between July 2017 and October 2019, 20 patients had undergone our new technique-Clip on Staple method, a preventive measure for bile leakage in anatomical liver resection using stapling devices. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients preoperatively. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board in our hospital (No.: 789).
Clip on Staple method. Anatomical liver resection was performed basically with the extrahepatic Glissonean pedicle approach (10, 11). Briefly, the roots of the Glissonean pedicles for the target segments were dissected from the liver hilum and encircled before the liver parenchymal transection. After temporal occlusion of these pedicles and confirmation of the demarcation line of the corresponding segments, the Glissonean pedicles were transected using the Endo-GIA™ Tri-Staple™ Curved Tip, 45 mm, camel (Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN, USA), followed by the liver parenchymal transection using the CUSA along the demarcation line and the respective landmarks. In the left hemi-hepatectomy, the Glissonean pedicle of the left lobe was transected above the Arantius plate. In the right hemi-hepatectomy, the Glissonean pedicles of the anterior and posterior segments were separately isolated and transected. After the parenchymal transection was completed, the full length of the stapled stump was reinforced by multiple clips (Figure 1). As a clipping device, the DS Titanium Ligation Clip, SM size, without latch (B. Braun, Aesculap®, Tuttlingen, Germany) was used.
Perioperative management. At least one 19 Fr. J-Vac silicon drain was placed near the liver parenchymal plane. The bilirubin level of the drainage fluid was measured until the drain was removed. The drain was removed until postoperative day 5 if the drainage fluid was clear and bile leakage and bacterial contamination were absent. All patients were followed for 3 months postoperatively.
Bile leakage. The primary outcome was postoperative bile leakage, defined according to the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) definitions (12). In summary, bile leakage is clinically defined as drain bilirubin levels at least 3 times greater than the serum bilirubin levels measured at the same time on postoperative day 3 or later, or as the need for radiologic intervention or relaparotomy. Grade A leakage requires little or no change in the patients' clinical management. Grade B leakage requires therapeutic intervention such as endobiliary decompression and/or percutaneous drainage of the biloma, or a Grade A leakage lasting for more than 7 days. Grade C leakage requires management with reoperation.
Results
Patient characteristics, summaries of the surgical procedures, and the patients' post-operative course are shown in Table I. In 19 of the 20 patients who had undergone the Clip on Staple method, surgeries were performed laparoscopically. Surgical procedures included 13 hemi-hepatectomies, 4 sectionectomies, and 3 segmentectomies. No patient developed postoperative bile leakage of any grade. There was no reoperation or readmission within 90 days.
Discussion
Although the exact post-hepatectomy bile leakage site is not clear, bile leakage reportedly occurs in 3-12% (13). In the clinical setting, bile leakage from the stapled Glissonean stump is occasionally encountered (Figure 2). In contrast to leakage from peripheral liver parenchyma in limited resection, bile leakage from the hilar Glissonean pedicles in anatomical resection tends to be refractory. This is due to the leakage point being in the hilar and the relatively large bile duct. This condition usually necessitates invasive intervention, i.e., endoscopic naso-biliary drainage for biliary decompression or percutaneous drainage (14). Therefore, it is important to implement effective preventive measures to lessen the incidence of bile leakage.
The exact pathogenesis of bile leakage after stapling division of the Glissonean pedicles is unknown. However, postoperative bile leakage occurs occasionally despite a negative intraoperative bile leakage test. This fact suggests that the stapled stump might loosen with time and the expanding force of the compressed Glissonean structure overwhelms the holding power of the staples (8). Figure 3 shows representative images that suggest the possibility of a delayed loosening of the stapled stump. Compared to the image just after division of the left Glissonean pedicle by the stapling device (Figure 3a), the image of the same patient 2 hours later showed an apparent widening of the stapled stump (Figure 3b). The Clip on Staple method is anticipated to prevent stump widening following improper staple formation and subsequent postoperative bile leakage.
A suture reinforcement of the stapled stump is another available method that is used as a preventive measure for bile leakage after stapler division. However, in an era of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic liver surgery has been increasingly performed globally (2). The most prominent feature of the Clip on Staple method is its simplicity and ease of application, even in laparoscopic surgeries. Only a few minutes is required to apply multiple clips on the stapled stump.
Although a prospective study is necessary to confirm the benefits of our technique, we believe that the Clip on Staple method is simple and offers a preventive effect for postoperative bile leakage after anatomical liver resection using stapling devices.
Acknowledgements
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
Guarantors of integrity of the entire study, M.N., T.N.; Study concepts, M.N.; Study design, M.N., T.N.; Patient management, T.T., R.M.; Data acquisition, M.N., T.T., R.M.; Data analysis, M.N., T.N.; Manuscript editing, M.N., T.T., R.M.; Manuscript review, T.N.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors declare no conflicts of interest regarding this study.
- Received November 21, 2019.
- Revision received November 26, 2019.
- Accepted November 29, 2019.
- Copyright© 2020, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved