Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticlePROCEEDINGS OF THE 22nd ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, December 8, 2018 (Tokyo, Japan)

Sarcomatous Component in Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Series of 7 Cases

SHINICHI TANIWAKI, TORU HISAKA, HISAMUNE SAKAI, YUICHI GOTO, YORIKO NOMURA, RYUICHI KAWAHARA, HIROTO ISHIKAWA, MASAFUMI YASUNAGA, YOSHIKI NAITO, JUN AKIBA, HIROHISA YANO, HIROYUKI TANAKA, YOSHITO AKAGI and KOJI OKUDA
Anticancer Research August 2019, 39 (8) 4575-4580; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13636
SHINICHI TANIWAKI
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU HISAKA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: thisaka{at}med.kurume-u.ac.jp
HISAMUNE SAKAI
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUICHI GOTO
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YORIKO NOMURA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYUICHI KAWAHARA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROTO ISHIKAWA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAFUMI YASUNAGA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIKI NAITO
2Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUN AKIBA
2Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROHISA YANO
3Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYUKI TANAKA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHITO AKAGI
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOJI OKUDA
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to examine the clinicopathological features of pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC). Patients and Methods: Our study included seven patients who underwent resection of PASC. Results: PASC is characterized by large tumors and strong infiltration into the major blood vessels and other organs, forcing many patients to undergo extended resections. In addition, all patients experienced liver metastasis recurrence following surgery, with a very poor prognosis. Histopathologically, a poorly differentiated sarcomatous component existed in all patients in addition to an adenocarcinoma component and squamous carcinoma component. Although P40 staining for the sarcomatous component was positive along with squamous carcinoma, E-cadherin expression disappeared while vimentin was expressed. It has been suggested that it is highly likely that these sarcomatous components are derived from squamous carcinoma and have an impact on prognosis. Conclusion: The sarcomatous component may be related to the biological malignancy of PASC.

  • Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma
  • sarcomatous components
  • clinicopathological study

Pancreatic cancer is a very aggressive malignancy with a very poor prognosis a 5-year survival rate of only 1-9.2%, and more than half of patients already have distant metastases at diagnosis (1-4). Among the pancreatic cancer, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the most common, accounting for about 85%, and pancreatic adenosquamous cell carcinoma (PASC) is a rare type, accounting for only 1-4% (1, 2, 5). It is clearly known that the prognosis of PASC is much worse than PDAC, and even in resected patients the median survival is only 5-14.8 months (1, 2, 5-11). Moreover, in other cancers [esophageal cancer (12), gastric cancer (13), colon cancer (14), gallbladder cancer (15), bile duct cancer (16, 17), lung cancer (18), and brest cancer (19)], adenosquamous carcinoma is also a poor prognostic type. PASC is defined as a cancer in which a squamous cell carcinoma component is present at 30% or more (1, 20). It has been reported that PASC is frequently associated with tumor growth, vascular and perineural invasion, and poor tumor cell differentiation (2, 6, 7, 9). Recently, it was reported that a very poorly differentiated sarcomatous component exists in PASC to a varying degree which may potentially have a strong impact on prognosis (2, 10, 21). The higher biological malignancy of PASC and its very poor prognosis may be related to the sarcomatous component. Evaluating the sarcomatous component in PASC is expected to clarify the biological malignancy of PASC. Therefore, we evaluated the sarcomatous component in PASC and studied the relation with clinicopathological factors and prognosis.

Patients and Methods

This clinicopathological study was conducted on seven patients with PASC among 118 patients with pancreas cancer who underwent resections at Kurume University Hospital from 2012 to 2017. The excised specimens were fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin solution and cut into 5 μm sections which were stained with hematoxylin-eosin (HE). Microscopic evaluation of immunostaining was performed as described below. PASC diagnosis was made based on the WHO classification (1) and staging was classified using the TNM classification (22).

Immunohistochemistry. Paraffin-embedded tissues were sectioned to 4 μm and examined on a coated glass slide. Sections with a sarcomatous component were selected per patient and assessed. These were labeled with the following antibodies: E-cadherin (100×; NCH-38, Dako cytomation, Carpinteria, CA, USA), vimentin (10×; V9, Dako cytomation) and Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1(ZEB1) (200×; IHC419, Bethyl Laboratories, Montgomery, TX, USA). Immunostaining with all antibodies was performed for 30 min on the fully automated Bond-Max system (Leica Microsystems, Newcastle, UK) using onboard heat-induced antigen retrieval with Epitope Retrieval Solution 1 for Vimentin and Retrieval Solution 2 for E-cadherin and ZEB1, followed by a Refine polymer detection system (Leica Microsystems). p40 (BC28, Ventana medical systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) staining was performed using BenchMark ULTRA fully automated immunostaining platform (Ventana medical systems). The slides were heat-treated using Ventana's CC1 retrieval solution for 36 minutes, and then were incubated with antibody for 32 min. This automated system used the streptavidin-biotin complex method with 3,3’diaminobenzidine as the chromogen (Ventana iVIEW DAB detection kit).

Statistical analysis. Clinical characteristics were evaluated using Student's t-test and Chi-square test. Survival curves of both groups were made using the Kaplan–Meier method, and Log-rank test was performed. Significant difference was set at p-value<0.05. JMP Pro 13.0.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses.

Results

Patient characteristics. The patients included five males and two females, aged from 49 to 75 years old. Compared with PDAC, PASC had no difference in age, gender, tumor site, and serum CA19-9, but tumor size was significantly larger (p=0.001).

Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was performed in four patients and distal pancreatectomy (DP) in three patients. Three patients who received PD (75%) also underwent combined resection of portal vein (PV) and/or superior mesenteric vein (SMV), one of which included combined resection of the right hepatic artery suspected of being infiltrated. Two patients (67%) who underwent DP also underwent combined resection of the left adrenal gland, one of which included combined resection of the celiac artery suspected of being invaded. Combined resection rate of the major arteries (e.g., celiac artery, common hepatic artery, right hepatic artery) and other organs (e.g., left adrenal gland) were significantly higher in PASC compared with PDAC.

Pathological diagnosis revealed that there were three T2 patients and four T3 patients, which were significantly more advanced than PDAC. Infiltration into the portal vein system such as PV, SMV, and splenic vein (SV) was found in five patients (71%), which was significantly higher than PDAC. Infiltration into other organs was found in three patients (two in the left adrenal gland, one in the spleen), which was significantly higher than PDAC. Regional lymph node metastases were found in all patients, while distant metastases were found in three patients, which was significantly higher than PDAC (Table I).

All patients developed recurrence due to liver metastasis and PASC had a very poor prognosis compared to PDAC (Figure 1).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological findings in the PASC and PDAC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Immunohistochemistry of sarcomatous component.

Pathological features. Macroscopically, the resected tumors were white and solid, with hemorrhage and necrosis inside. Histologically, the proliferation of bizarre tumor cells besides the adenocarcinoma component and squamous cell carcinoma component we confirmed (Figure 2A). The tumor cells lacked cell adhesion and exhibited morphologies from round to spindle-shaped. We defined them as a sarcomatous component (Figure 2B).

The frequency of occurrence of sarcomatous component was clearly significant compared to PDAC (Table I). The sarcomatous component was sometimes observed as an independent component and sometimes as a continuation of the squamous carcinoma component. We focused on this component and conducted immunological studies. E-cadherin expression was observed in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma but not in the sarcomatous component (Figure 3A). On the other hand, Vimentin expression was not observed in adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma but in the sarcomatous component (Figure 3B). Moreover, P40 expression was not observed in adenocarcinoma but in squamous cell carcinoma and sarcomatous component (Figure 3C). ZEB1 expression was observed in sarcomatous component of three patients (Figure 3D) (Table II).

Discussion

It is difficult to detect pancreatic cancer early and is often found progressed (4). PASC is also found to be in progress, but its characteristics have become clear. PASC is characterized by its expansive growth and large tumor size. Squamous cell carcinoma is known to proliferate twice as fast as adenocarcinoma (11, 23). Hashimoto et al. have reported that Ki-67 labeling index is higher in squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma (24). In support of this, contrast-enhanced CT examinations often show large tumor size and internal cystic changes formed by hemorrhage and necrosis, in particular, the ring-shaped contrast effect around the tumor is a characteristic of ASC that can be a predictive factor for diagnosis (25, 26).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Overall survival curves of patients with resected pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) (n=7) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) (n=111). Median survival for PASC is 6.4 months and PDAC is 33.5 months.

The most effective treatment for PASC and PDAC to prolong overall survival is surgery (2, 6, 7). In this study, all cases were resected, but there were many cases invading tissues outside the pancreas. Therefore, they underwent combined resections of the portal vein, the arteries, and other organs. If the tumor is large and combined resection is expected, the presence of PASC should be assumed.

Histopathologically, vascular infiltration and nerve infiltration were observed in all patients, and histological infiltration into surrounding organs (portal organs and other organs) was confirmed. Moreover, there were significantly more lymph node metastases and distant metastases compared to PDAC, suggesting that biological malignancy was strong. Although it is not clear why PASC is so poor, a sarcomatous component was observed in all seven patients to varying degrees. There are very few case reports on the sarcomatous component of PASC, and all report very poor prognoses (27). So, sarcomatous components were considered to be associated with poor prognosis, and we performed immunostaining to define these sarcomatous components. As a result, P40 expression which has been shown in squamous cell carcinoma was also observed in the sarcomatous component (28). Therefore, there is a high possibility that the sarcomatous component is derived from squamous cell carcinoma. In the transition from squamous cell carcinoma to sarcomatous component, it is possible that the expression of E-cadherin decreased and the expression of vimentin increased. Moreover, the expression of ZEB1 was confirmed in approximately half of the patients. Therefore, we hypothesized that epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) was induced by certain factors. ZEB1, as well as snail and twist, etc. are known as transcription factors driving EMT (29, 30). It is considered that such a mechanism may have acted in some cases of sarcomatous component.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Microscopic features in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. (A) Adenocarcinoma component (black arrow) and squamous cell carcinoma component (white arrow) (HE staining, ×40). (B) A sarcomatous component was present in all cases, which is the lack of adhesion between cells, and the proliferation of bizarre tumor cells that exhibit morphologies from round to spindle-shaped (HE staining, ×200).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Microscopic features and immunohistochemical characteristics of sarcomatous components (×200). (A) E-cadherin expression was not identified. (B) Vimentin expression was observed. (C) P40 expression was observed, similar to squamous cell carcinoma. (D) Zinc finger E-box binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) expression was observed in three patients.

In this study, the survival time of all patients who underwent PASC resection was less than one year and the prognosis was very poor. The presence of squamous cell carcinoma is known to deteriorate the prognosis of pancreatic tumors (31); moreover, it is known that in cholangiocarcinoma, the prognosis is worse as the squamous cell carcinoma component is higher (16). Therefore, it is imperative to develop more effective treatments.

Recently, it has been found that PD-L1 appears at a certain percentage (15-83%) in PASC (32, 33), and development of new therapeutics including immune checkpoint inhibitors is expected. Furthermore, miR-509-5p and miR-1243 have been identified as EMT inhibitory miRNA and it has been revealed that they inhibit the expression of ZEB1 and Snail (34, 35). These are expected not only as biomarkers but also as targets of novel treatments of PDAC. Since ZEB1 expression was also confirmed in PASC in this study, they may function in the same way in some patients.

In conclusion, the biological malignancy of PASC was higher than PDAC and sarcomatous components were confirmed in all patients with PASC to varying degrees. It has been suggested that it is highly likely that these sarcomatous components are derived from squamous cell carcinoma and have an impact on prognosis. Emergence and proliferation of PASC need to be further examined for the development of future treatment strategies.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Shinichi Taniwaki designed the study, and wrote the initial draft of the manuscript. Shinichi Taniwaki and Toru Hisaka contributed to analysis and interpretation of data, and assisted in the preparation of the manuscript. All other Authors have contributed to data collection and interpretation, and critically reviewed the manuscript. All Authors approved the final version of the manuscript, and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest associated with this manuscript.

  • Received May 23, 2019.
  • Revision received June 26, 2019.
  • Accepted June 27, 2019.
  • Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bosman FT,
    2. International Agency for Research on C and World Health O
    : Who classification of tumours of the digestive system. 4th ed. International Agency For Research on Cancer, 2010. Lyon, 2010.
  2. ↵
    1. Hester CA,
    2. Augustine MM,
    3. Choti MA,
    4. Mansour JC,
    5. Minter RM,
    6. Polanco PM,
    7. Porembka MR,
    8. Wang SC,
    9. Yopp AC
    : Comparative outcomes of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: An analysis of the national cancer database. J Surg Oncol 118(1): 21-30, 2018. PMID: 29878370. DOI: 10.1002/ jso.25112
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Aslan M,
    2. Shahbazi R,
    3. Ulubayram K,
    4. Ozpolat B
    : Targeted therapies for pancreatic cancer and hurdles ahead. Anticancer Res 38(12): 6591-6606, 2018. PMID: 30504367. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13026
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Egawa S,
    2. Toma H,
    3. Ohigashi H,
    4. Okusaka T,
    5. Nakao A,
    6. Hatori T,
    7. Maguchi H,
    8. Yanagisawa A,
    9. Tanaka M
    : Japan pancreatic cancer registry; 30th year anniversary. Pancreas 41(7): 985-992, 2012. PMID: 22750974. DOI: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318258055c
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Matsuno S,
    2. Egawa S,
    3. Fukuyama S,
    4. Motoi F,
    5. Sunamura M,
    6. Isaji S,
    7. Imaizumi T,
    8. Okada S,
    9. Kato H,
    10. Suda K,
    11. Nakao A,
    12. Hiraoka T,
    13. Hosotani R,
    14. Takeda K
    : Pancreatic cancer registry in Japan: 20 years of experience. Pancreas 28(3): 219-230, 2004. PMID: 15084961.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Boyd CA,
    2. Benarroch-Gampel J,
    3. Sheffield KM,
    4. Cooksley CD,
    5. Riall TS
    : 415 patients with adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: A population-based analysis of prognosis and survival. J Surg Res 174(1): 12-19, 2012. PMID: 21816433. DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.015
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Katz MH,
    2. Taylor TH,
    3. Al-Refaie WB,
    4. Hanna MH,
    5. Imagawa DK,
    6. Anton-Culver H,
    7. Zell JA
    : Adenosquamous versus adenocarcinoma of the pancreas: A population-based outcomes analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 15(1): 165-174, 2011. PMID: 21082275. DOI: 10.1007/s11605-010-1378-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hsu JT,
    2. Chen HM,
    3. Wu RC,
    4. Yeh CN,
    5. Yeh TS,
    6. Hwang TL,
    7. Jan YY,
    8. Chen MF
    : Clinicopathologic features and outcomes following surgery for pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma. World J Surg Oncol 6: 95, 2008. PMID: 18764955. DOI: 10.1186/1477-7819-6-95
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Komatsu H,
    2. Egawa S,
    3. Motoi F,
    4. Morikawa T,
    5. Sakata N,
    6. Naitoh T,
    7. Katayose Y,
    8. Ishida K,
    9. Unno M
    : Clinicopathological features and surgical outcomes of adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: A retrospective analysis of patients with resectable stage tumors. Surg Today 45(3): 297-304, 2015. PMID: 24973941. DOI: 10.1007/s00595-014-0934-0
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Voong KR,
    2. Davison J,
    3. Pawlik TM,
    4. Uy MO,
    5. Hsu CC,
    6. Winter J,
    7. Hruban RH,
    8. Laheru D,
    9. Rudra S,
    10. Swartz MJ,
    11. Nathan H,
    12. Edil BH,
    13. Schulick R,
    14. Cameron JL,
    15. Wolfgang CL,
    16. Herman JM
    : Resected pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: Clinicopathologic review and evaluation of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in 38 patients. Hum Pathol 41(1): 113-122, 2010. PMID: 19801164. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2009.07.012
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Okabayashi T,
    2. Hanazaki K
    : Surgical outcome of adeno-squamous carcinoma of the pancreas. World J Gastroenterol 14(44): 6765-6770, 2008. PMID: 19058301. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.14.6765
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Chen SB,
    2. Weng HR,
    3. Wang G,
    4. Yang JS,
    5. Yang WP,
    6. Liu DT,
    7. Chen YP,
    8. Zhang H
    : Primary adenosquamous carcinoma of the esophagus. World J Gastroenterol 19(45): 8382-8390, 2013. PMID: 24363531. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i45.8382
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Chen YY,
    2. Li AF,
    3. Huang KH,
    4. Lan YT,
    5. Chen MH,
    6. Chao Y,
    7. Lo SS,
    8. Wu CW,
    9. Shyr YM,
    10. Fang WL
    : Adenosquamous carcinoma of the stomach and review of the literature. Pathol Oncol Res 21(3): 547-551, 2015. PMID: 25567665. DOI: 10.1007/s12253-014-9890-7
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Masoomi H,
    2. Ziogas A,
    3. Lin BS,
    4. Barleben A,
    5. Mills S,
    6. Stamos MJ,
    7. Zell JA
    : Population-based evaluation of adenosquamous carcinoma of the colon and rectum. Dis Colon Rectum 55(5): 509-514, 2012. PMID: 22513428. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31 82420953
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Roa JC,
    2. Tapia O,
    3. Cakir A,
    4. Basturk O,
    5. Dursun N,
    6. Akdemir D,
    7. Saka B,
    8. Losada H,
    9. Bagci P,
    10. Adsay NV
    : Squamous cell and adenosquamous carcinomas of the gallbladder: Clinicopathological analysis of 34 cases identified in 606 carcinomas. Mod Pathol 24(8): 1069-1078, 2011. PMID: 21532545. DOI: 10.1038/mod pathol.2011.68
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hong SM,
    2. Kim MJ,
    3. Jang KT,
    4. Yoon GS,
    5. Cho H,
    6. Frierson HF,
    7. Yu E
    : Adenosquamous carcinoma of extrahepatic bile duct: Clinicopathologic study of 12 cases. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 1(2): 147-156, 2008. PMID: 18784802.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Okabayashi T,
    2. Kobayashi M,
    3. Nishimori I,
    4. Namikawa T,
    5. Okamoto K,
    6. Onishi S,
    7. Araki K
    : Adenosquamous carcinoma of the extrahepatic biliary tract: Clinicopathological analysis of Japanese cases of this uncommon disease. J Gastroenterol 40(2): 192-199, 2005. PMID: 15770404. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-004-1520-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Filosso PL,
    2. Ruffini E,
    3. Asioli S,
    4. Giobbe R,
    5. Macri L,
    6. Bruna MC,
    7. Sandri A,
    8. Oliaro A
    : Adenosquamous lung carcinomas: A histologic subtype with poor prognosis. Lung Cancer 74(1): 25-29, 2011. PMID: 21371773. DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.030
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Soo K,
    2. Tan PH
    : Low-grade adenosquamous carcinoma of the breast. J Clin Pathol 66(6): 506-511, 2013. PMID: 23268316. DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2012-201084
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Japanese Pancreas Society
    : Classification of pancreatic carcinoma. Fourth English edition. Kanehara & Co., Ltd., Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan, 2017.
  19. ↵
    1. Kardon DE,
    2. Thompson LDR,
    3. Przygodzki RM,
    4. Heffess CS
    : Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: A clinicopathologic series of 25 cases. Modern Pathol 14(5): 443-451, 2001. PMID: 11353055. DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.3880332
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Brierley JD,
    2. Brierley JD,
    3. Gospodarowicz MK,
    4. Wittekind C
    : Tnm classification of malignant tumours. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated: Chicester, 2016.
  21. ↵
    1. Charbit A,
    2. Malaise EP,
    3. Tubiana M
    : Relation between the pathological nature and the growth rate of human tumors. Eur J Cancer (1965) 7(4): 307-315, 1971. PMID: 4328281.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hoshimoto S,
    2. Hoshi N,
    3. Hishinuma S,
    4. Shirakawa H,
    5. Tomikawa M,
    6. Ozawa I,
    7. Wakamatsu S,
    8. Hoshi S,
    9. Hirabayashi K,
    10. Ogata Y
    : Clinical implications of the proliferative ability of the squamous component regarding tumor progression of adeno-squamous carcinoma of the pancreas: A preliminary report. Pancreatology 17(5): 788-794, 2017. PMID: 28784574. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2017.08.001
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Toshima F,
    2. Inoue D,
    3. Yoshida K,
    4. Yoneda N,
    5. Minami T,
    6. Kobayashi S,
    7. Ikdeda H,
    8. Matsui O,
    9. Gabata T
    : Adenosquamous carcinoma of pancreas: Ct and mr imaging features in eight patients, with pathologic correlations and comparison with adenocarcinoma of pancreas. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(3): 508-520, 2016. PMID: 27039322. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-015-0616-4
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Imaoka H,
    2. Shimizu Y,
    3. Mizuno N,
    4. Hara K,
    5. Hijioka S,
    6. Tajika M,
    7. Tanaka T,
    8. Ishihara M,
    9. Ogura T,
    10. Obayashi T,
    11. Shinagawa A,
    12. Sakaguchi M,
    13. Yamaura H,
    14. Kato M,
    15. Niwa Y,
    16. Yamao K
    : Ring-enhancement pattern on contrast-enhanced ct predicts adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: A matched case-control study. Pancreatology 14(3): 221-226, 2014. PMID: 24854619. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.02.005
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Lu BC,
    2. Wang C,
    3. Yu JH,
    4. Shen ZH,
    5. Yang JH
    : A huge adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas with sarcomatoid change: An unusual case report. World J Gastroenterol 20(43): 16381-16386, 2014. PMID: 25473201. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20. i43.16381
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Vignaud JM
    : Carcinomes épidermoïde, basaloïde et adénosquameux pulmonaires. Ann Pathol 36(1): 15-23, 2016. PMID: 26746368. DOI: 10.1016/j.annpat.2015.11.011
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Bronsert P,
    2. Kohler I,
    3. Timme S,
    4. Kiefer S,
    5. Werner M,
    6. Schilling O,
    7. Vashist Y,
    8. Makowiec F,
    9. Brabletz T,
    10. Hopt UT,
    11. Bausch D,
    12. Kulemann B,
    13. Keck T,
    14. Wellner UF
    : Prognostic significance of zinc finger e-box binding homeobox 1 (zeb1) expression in cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic head cancer. Surgery 156(1): 97-108, 2014. PMID: 24929761. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.02.018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Thiery JP,
    2. Acloque H,
    3. Huang RYJ,
    4. Nieto MA
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease. Cell 139(5): 871-890, 2009. PMID: 19945376. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.007
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Olson MT,
    2. Siddiqui MT,
    3. Ali SZ
    : The differential diagnosis of squamous cells in pancreatic aspirates: From contamination to adenosquamous carcinoma. Acta Cytol 57(2): 139-146, 2013. PMID: 23406837. DOI: 10.1159/000346326
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Silvestris N,
    2. Brunetti O,
    3. Pinto R,
    4. Petriella D,
    5. Argentiero A,
    6. Fucci L,
    7. Tommasi S,
    8. Danza K,
    9. De Summa S
    : Immunological mutational signature in adenosquamous cancer of pancreas: An exploratory study of potentially therapeutic targets. Expert Opin Ther Targets 22(5): 453-461, 2018. PMID: 29561217. DOI: 10.1080/14728222.2018.1456530
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Tanigawa M,
    2. Naito Y,
    3. Akiba J,
    4. Kawahara A,
    5. Okabe Y,
    6. Ishida Y,
    7. Ishikawa H,
    8. Hisaka T,
    9. Fujita F,
    10. Yasunaga M,
    11. Shigaki T,
    12. Sudo T,
    13. Mihara Y,
    14. Nakayama M,
    15. Kondo R,
    16. Kusano H,
    17. Shimamatsu K,
    18. Okuda K,
    19. Akagi Y,
    20. Yano H
    : Pd-l1 expression in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma: Pd-l1 expression is limited to the squamous component. Pathol Res Pract 214(12): 2069-2074, 2018. PMID: 30477643. DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2018.10.006
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Hiramoto H,
    2. Muramatsu T,
    3. Ichikawa D,
    4. Tanimoto K,
    5. Yasukawa S,
    6. Otsuji E,
    7. Inazawa J
    : Mir-509-5p and mir-1243 increase the sensitivity to gemcitabine by inhibiting epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep 7(1): 4002, 2017. PMID: 28638102. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-04191-w
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Gurbuz N,
    2. Ozpolat B
    : Microrna-based targeted therapeutics in pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 39(2): 529-532, 2019. PMID: 30711926. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13144
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 39, Issue 8
August 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sarcomatous Component in Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Series of 7 Cases
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Sarcomatous Component in Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Series of 7 Cases
SHINICHI TANIWAKI, TORU HISAKA, HISAMUNE SAKAI, YUICHI GOTO, YORIKO NOMURA, RYUICHI KAWAHARA, HIROTO ISHIKAWA, MASAFUMI YASUNAGA, YOSHIKI NAITO, JUN AKIBA, HIROHISA YANO, HIROYUKI TANAKA, YOSHITO AKAGI, KOJI OKUDA
Anticancer Research Aug 2019, 39 (8) 4575-4580; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13636

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Sarcomatous Component in Pancreatic Adenosquamous Carcinoma: A Clinicopathological Series of 7 Cases
SHINICHI TANIWAKI, TORU HISAKA, HISAMUNE SAKAI, YUICHI GOTO, YORIKO NOMURA, RYUICHI KAWAHARA, HIROTO ISHIKAWA, MASAFUMI YASUNAGA, YOSHIKI NAITO, JUN AKIBA, HIROHISA YANO, HIROYUKI TANAKA, YOSHITO AKAGI, KOJI OKUDA
Anticancer Research Aug 2019, 39 (8) 4575-4580; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13636
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • A Luminal-Basal Stratification of the Native Human Pancreatic Duct is Differentially Represented in Pancreatic Cancers
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22nd ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, December 8, 2018 (Tokyo, Japan)

  • Correlation Between Radiosensitizing Activity and the Stereo-structure of the TX-2036 Series of Molecules
  • Clinicopathological Study of Resections of Intraductal Papillary Neoplasm of the Bile Duct
Show more PROCEEDINGS OF THE 22nd ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, December 8, 2018 (Tokyo, Japan)

Clinical Studies

  • Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A in Gallbladder Cancer Cells: A Clinicopathological Study
  • Prediction of Pathological Response and Prognosis After Surgery by Tumor Reduction During Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Tolerance and Outcomes of Partial Breast Radiation in a Community-based Setting
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma
  • sarcomatous components
  • clinicopathological study
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire