Research ArticlePROCEEDINGS OF THE 22nd ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, December 8, 2018 (Tokyo, Japan)

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Increases PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

EIJI FUKUOKA, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TOMOKO TANAKA, RYUICHIRO SAWADA, YUTAKA SUGITA, AKIRA ARIMOTO, MITSUGU FUJITA, GOSUKE TAKIGUCHI, TAKERU MATSUDA, TARO OSHIKIRI, TETSU NAKAMURA, SATOSHI SUZUKI and YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Anticancer Research August 2019, 39 (8) 4539-4548; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13631

Abstract

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate PD-L1 expression and its association with prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin, NAC-FP). Patients and Methods: Using a database of 69 ESCC patients, we analyzed PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs), as well as the density of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in pretreatment biopsy specimens-versus-surgical specimens after resection. We determined the prognostic significance of these factors. Results: The fraction of ESCC containing ICs expressing PD-L1 and having a high CD8+ TIL density was significantly increased after neoadjuvant treatment. However, PD-L1 expression on TCs or ICs, and CD8+ TIL density, was not significantly associated with patient survival in ESCC patients. Conclusion: NAC-FP induced PD-L1 expression on ICs and CD8+ TILs in ESCC patients. This finding suggests that PD-1/PD-L1 blockade could be combined with NAC-FP to treat ESCC patients.

Esophageal cancer is the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death, with an estimated 572,000 new cases per year, worldwide (1). It is of two main histological types, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) or esophageal adenocarcinoma. In Asia, incidence rates of squamous cell carcinoma are much higher than adenocarcinoma (2). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) or chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy has become the standard treatment worldwide for patients with ESCC. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group 9907study showed that NAC consisting of 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin (FP) significantly extended survival in clinical stage II/III ESCC, but 5-year survival in patients treated with NAC and surgery was still only 54.8% (3). Therefore, additional treatment strategies are needed to improve the poor prognosis for ESCC patients.

Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have yielded breakthrough treatments in several different solid cancers (4-8), including esophageal cancer (9). In order to reliably achieve cures in a greater fraction of patients, perioperative ICI immunotherapy is now being considered. In preclinical models, ICI was shown to be more effective in neoadjuvant, than in the adjuvant form (10). More recently, in the clinical setting, preoperative treatment with a single dose of anti-PD-1 ICI has been shown to be effective in melanoma (11) and non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (12). In addition, in order to enhance therapeutic efficacy, combination therapies are being enthusiastically tested (13). In ESCC, an in vitro study revealed that FP chemotherapy induced PD-L1 expression (14). Based on these findings, it is hypothesized that a combination of FP and anti- PD-1/PD-L1 ICI is a promising preoperative treatment for ESCC. In this context, in order to study the action of this combination therapy, it is important to analyze the immune tumor microenvironment (iTME) after NAC. Previous studies have shown that the status of the iTME as classified by PD-L1 expression and TIL density, might be predictive of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ICI efficacy (15). Some studies have documented that PD-L1 expression has prognostic value in ESCC patients undergoing surgery without any neoadjuvant therapy (16-20). However, robust data on PD-L1 expression in ESCC patients treated with NAC are limited (21, 22). Therefore, in the present study, we aimed to clarify the effect of NAC on the iTME, utilizing FP (NAC-FP) and measuring PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TIL density in ESCC patients. We compared expression in biopsy specimens before NAC-FP and surgical specimens after NAC-FP. In addition, we also aimed to elucidate the impact of PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TIL density on the long-term outcomes of ESCC patients treated with NAC-FP followed by surgery with curative intent.

View this table:
Table I.

Relationships between clinicopathological characteristics and PD-L1 expression.

Materials and Methods

Patients. Of the patients who underwent esophagectomy after chemotherapy at the Kobe University Hospital between 2008 January and 2014 December, 71 met the following criteria and were included in this study: 1) histologically confirmed ESCC by biopsy; 2) R0/R1resection performed; 3) patients completed 2 cycles of FP chemotherapy; 4) paired biopsies and surgical specimens were available. We excluded 2 cases (2.8%) because of pathological complete response. Hence, 69 cases were finally enrolled. The Union for International Cancer Control Tumor-Node-Metastasis Classification (7th edition) was used for staging. The histopathological response to NAC was determined according to the criteria of the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases. Grades are determined based on the percentage of remaining viable tumor cells within the entire tumor lesion defined as follows: grade 3, no viable residual tumor cells; grade 2, less than two-thirds; grade 1, two-thirds or more; grade 0, all viable. The FP chemotherapeutic regimen consisted of two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m2, days 1-5) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2, day 1). Surgery was performed about 4-6 weeks after chemotherapy (23). Informed consent was obtained from each patient, and this retrospective study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board and the Ethics Committee of the Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe University School of Medicine.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC staining was performed on 4-μm slices. Slides were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in a graded series of ethanol dilutions. Antigen retrieval was performed by heating in a pressure oven. Biopsy specimens before NAC and surgical specimens after NAC were immunostained with rabbit monoclonal anti-PD-L1 antibody (dilution 1:100, clone SP142; Spring Bioscience, Pleasanton, CA, USA) and rabbit monoclonal anti-CD8 antibody (dilution 1:100, SP57; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). Human placental tissue was used as a positive control for PD-L1 staining.

Immunohistochemical analysis. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) was evaluated in a semi-quantitative fashion according to a previously reported scoring system (24). PD-L1 expression on TCs was categorized into four groups according to the percentage of PD-L1-positive TCs, namely TC0<1%, 1%<TC1<5%, 5%<TC2<50%, and TC3≥50%. PD-L1 expression on IC was categorized into four groups according to the percentage of PD-L1-positive ICs within all ICs in the tumor area as follows: IC0<1%, 1%<IC1<5%, 5%< IC2<10%, and TC3≥10%. CD8+ TIL density was categorized in the same manner as PD-L1 expression on ICs. The immunohistochemical staining was independently evaluated by two of the authors who were blinded to the clinical data. PD-L1 positivity was defined as ≥5% of TCs or ICs (Figure 1). To be scored as positive, the density of CD8+ TILs was defined as ≥10% of ICs.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Representative micrographs of sections from esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). A. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs). B. PD-L1 expression on immune cells (ICs). C. PD-L1 expression on neither TCs nor ICs. D. CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in tumor tissue. E. No CD8+ TILs in tumor tissue. Magnification: 200×.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using JMP® 11 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Pearson's Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the relationship between immune markers and patient characteristics. McNemar's test was used to analyze changes of PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TILs in surgical specimens relative to the values measured in the biopsy specimens. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed using the log-rank test. A p-value of <0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Patient characteristics and immunohistochemistry. Patients at diagnosis ranged in age from 44 to 82 years (median=68 years) and were predominantly male (60 of 69, 87.0%). The location of the tumor was the upper esophagus in 20 patients (29.0%), the middle esophagus in 22 (31.9%), and the lower esophagus in 27 (39.1%). The response to NAC was grade 2 in 10 patients (14.5%), grade 1 in 51 (73.9%), and grade 0 in the remaining 8 (11.6%). A comparison of the clinicopathological characteristics according to PD-L1 expression on TCs and ICs in surgical specimens is shown in Table I. PD-L1 was expressed on TCs in 44.9% of patients (31/69), and was associated with older age (≥60) (p=0.028) (Table I). On the other hand, PD-L1 expression on ICs was observed in 81.2% of patients (56/69). No relationship was found between PD-L1 expression on ICs and any clinicopathological characteristic.

PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TIL density before and after NAC. We compared PD-L1 expression on TCs and ICs, and the density of CD8+ TILs in biopsy specimens before NAC and surgical specimens after NAC for each ESCC patient according to the scoring system described above (24). The distribution of scores was then examined (Figure 2). Although not statistically significant, the percentage of patients with TCs expressing PD-L1 increased from 34.8% before NAC to 44.9% after NAC (p=0.114) (Figure 2A). On the other hand, the percentage of patients with ICs expressing PD-L1 increased from 60.9% before NAC to 81.2% after NAC, and this was significant (p=0.004) (Figure 2B). The percentage of patients with a high density of CD8+ TILs also increased significantly from 21.7% before NAC to 66.7% after NAC (p<0.001) (Figure 2C).

Association of PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TIL density with survival. We assessed OS and RFS according to PD-L1 expression on either TCs or ICs, and the density of CD8+ TILs but found no significant difference between groups for the entire cohort of patients (Figure 3). Next, we stratified patients into pathological stage I-II-vs.-stage III. In stage I-II, PD-L1 expression on ICs was indeed associated with improved OS and RFS (p=0.022 and p=0.033, respectively) (Figure 4A and B),but in patients with stage III disease was not associated with OS or RFS (p=0.482 and p=0.502, respectively) (Figure 4C, D). On the other hand, PD-L1 expression on TCs as well as CD8+ TIL density was also not associated with survival if the pathological stages were stratified (data not shown).

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Distribution of PD-L1 expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Each sample of designated esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) was evaluated by the scoring system described previously (24). A. PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs), B. PD-L1 expression on immune cells (ICs), C. CD8+ TIL density in ESCC.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS and RFS. Univariate and multivariate analyses of OS are summarized in Table II. In the former, clinical T, clinical stage, and pathological stage were prognostic factors for OS (p=0.046, p=0.031, and p<0.001, respectively). Pathological stage remained an independent prognostic factor for OS in the multivariate analysis (p<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses of RFS are summarized in Table III. Again, in the univariate analysis, clinical T, clinical stage, and pathological stage were prognostic factors for RFS (p=0.021, p=0.038, and <0.001, respectively). Also, pathological stage remained the only independent prognostic factor for RFS in the multivariate analysis (p<0.001). Thus, neither PD-L1 expression on TCs or ICs, nor CD8+ TIL density were associated with OS or RFS in the present study.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Survival analysis for all 69 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients classified according to PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (TCs) or immune cells (ICs), and CD8+ TIL density.

Discussion

Here, we showed that PD-L1 expression on ICs, as well as CD8+ TIL density, increased significantly following NAC-FP, but that neither PD-L1 expression on ICs or TCs nor CD8+ TIL density was associated with survival in ESCC patients after this neoadjuvant chemotherapy (Figures 2 and 3). This study is novel, in that we strictly selected pathological samples from curative esophagectomy following completion of two cycles of NAC-FP and were able to compare biopsy specimens before NAC with matched surgical specimens from the same patients after NAC.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Survival analyses based on pathological stage of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) according to PD-L1 expression on immune cells (ICs). A. Pathological stage I, II patients with PD-L1 expression on ICs had significantly longer overall survival (p=0.022). B. Pathological stage I, II patients with PD-L1 expression on ICs had significantly longer relapse-free survival (p=0.033). C and D. In patients with pathological stage III disease, PD-L1 expression on IC was not associated with OS and RFS (p=0.482 and p=0.502, respectively).

View this table:
Table II.

Analysis of overall survival.

View this table:
Table III.

Analysis of recurrence-free survival.

Presently, reliable data on PD-L1 expression in ESCC tumors from patients treated with NAC are limited (21, 22). In the current study, PD-L1 expression on ICs, as well as CD8+ TIL density, was found to be significantly increased in NAC-FP-treated ESCC (Figure 2B, C), whereas although PD-L1 expression was also increased on TCs, this failed to reach significance (Figure 2A). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to assess PD-L1 expression solely in NAC-FP-pre-treated ESCC patients. PD-L1 up-regulation on TCs is consistent with a previous report that patients with tumors expressing PD-L1 were more likely to have received NAC (22). The finding of increased CD8+ TILs after NAC is also consistent with a previous report showing that the density of CD8+ lymphocytes in the stroma was significantly greater in NAC-treated ESCC patients relative to those not receiving NAC (25).

In ESCC patients with no preoperative therapy, most studies have suggested that PD-L1 expression on TCs was associated with poor survival (16, 18, 20). In contrast, some other reports indicated that PD-L1 expression on TCs was associated with improved survival (19, 26). On the other hand, in terms of PD-L1 expression on ICs, a few reports have shown that it was not associated with survival (18, 19).

Our study in ESCC patients after NAC-FP showed no positive or negative associations of either PD-L1 expression on ICs or TCs, or CD8+ TIL density, with survival (Figure 3). This is consistent with a previous report that PD-L1 expression on TCs was not significantly associated with survival following preoperative treatment (chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) (27). However, PD-L1 expression on ESCC TCs in patients treated with NAC combining cisplatin and 5-FU with adriamycin or docetaxel was reported to be associated with poor survival (22). In addition, PD-L1 expression on ICs was a poor prognostic factor in a study of a ESCC population where most of cases received neoadjuvant treatment (21). Thus, these disparities may be the result of differential treatments and further studies stratifying patients according to each chemotherapy regimen will be required to elucidate the relationship between PD-L1 expression and prognoses of ESCC patients after neoadjuvant treatments.

The present study did show that PD-L1 expression on IC was associated with an improved prognosis in patients with pathological stage I, II disease, but not stage III (Figure 4). The association between PD-L1 expression on ICs and a better clinical outcome has been observed in some types of solid cancers (28, 29), but the mechanism by which high PD-L1 expression on IC contributes to a better clinical outcome remains still unclear. However, our findings may indicate that, in advanced stage ESCC, there is an immune suppression different from that in the early one. Further studies are needed to elucidate the mechanism in the future.

The anti-PD-L1 antibody (clone SP142) used in this study is the reagent used for the complementary diagnostic test for atezolizumab. Previous reports showed that high PD-L1 expression on TCs or ICs (TC3 or IC3) was associated with response to atezolizumab in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (30-32). In that study, PD-L1 TC3 or IC3 in surgical specimens was seen in 66.6% of patients (46/69). This suggests that ESCC patients pretreated with NAC-FP would be good candidates for responding to atezolizumab treatment. Additionally, a previous report showed that the presence of CD8+ TILs before anti-PD-1 ICI predicts the response in melanoma (33). These findings suggest that pre-treatment of ESCC patients with NAC-FP would increase their responsiveness to anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ICI. Indeed, a phase I clinical trial of atezolizumab in combination with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin for esophageal cancer is ongoing and looks promising. Further studies are needed to develop more efficient neoadjuvant strategies in combination with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ICI using biomarkers to predict responses.

A limitation of this study is the potential discordance between biopsy specimens and surgical specimens regarding the estimation of PD-L1 expression. Ilie et al. have reported that results from biopsy specimens underestimated PD-L1 expression as assessed in surgical specimens from patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (34).

In conclusion, NAC-FP increased PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TIL density in ESSC patients and PD-L1 expression on TCs or ICs, and CD8+ TIL density, was not significantly associated with patient survival in ESCC patients. Further studies are needed to develop more effective neoadjuvant strategies in combination with anti-PD-1/PD- L1 ICI to improve the clinical outcome of ESCC.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (B) 16H05415 from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan, and grants from the Uehara Memorial Foundation.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    Conception and design: Yoshihiro Kakeji, Kimihiro Yamashita, Mitsugu Fujita, Eiji Fukuoka; Acquisition of data: Eiji Fukuoka, Tomoko Tanaka, Ryuichiro Sawada, Yutaka Sugita, Akira Arimoto, Gosuke Takiguchi, Takeru Matsuda, Taro Oshikiri, Tetsu Nakamura, Satoshi Suzuki;Analysis and interpretation of data: Eiji Fukuoka; Writing, review, and revision of manuscript: Eiji Fukuoka, Kimihiro Yamashita, Yoshihiro Kakeji.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declared that they have no conflict of interest in regard to this study.

  • Received May 23, 2019.
  • Revision received June 19, 2019.
  • Accepted July 24, 2019.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Colombet M,
    3. Soerjomataram I,
    4. Mathers C,
    5. Parkin DM,
    6. Piñeros M,
    7. Znaor A,
    8. Bray F
    : Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 44(8): 1941-1953, 2019. PMID: 30350 310. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31937
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Shibata A,
    2. Matsuda T,
    3. Ajiki W,
    4. Sobue T
    : Trend in incidence of adenocarcinoma of the esophagus in Japan, 1993-2001. Jpn J Clin Oncol 38: 464-468, 2008. PMID: 18664481. DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyn064
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ando N,
    2. Kato H,
    3. Igaki H,
    4. Shinoda M,
    5. Ozawa S,
    6. Shimizu H,
    7. Nakamura T,
    8. Yabusaki H,
    9. Aoyama N,
    10. Kurita A,
    11. Ikeda K,
    12. Kanda T,
    13. Tsujinaka T,
    14. Nakamura K,
    15. Fukuda H
    : A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19: 68-74, 2012. PMID 21879261. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Horn L,
    2. Spigel DR,
    3. Vokes EE,
    4. Holgado E,
    5. Ready N,
    6. Steins M,
    7. Poddubskaya E,
    8. Borghaei H,
    9. Felip E,
    10. Paz-Ares L,
    11. Pluzanski A,
    12. Reckamp KL,
    13. Burgio MA,
    14. Kohlhäeufl M,
    15. Waterhouse D,
    16. Barlesi F,
    17. Antonia S,
    18. Arrieta O,
    19. Fayette J,
    20. Crinò L,
    21. Rizvi N,
    22. Reck M,
    23. Hellmann MD,
    24. Geese WJ,
    25. Li A,
    26. Blackwood-Chirchir A,
    27. Healey D,
    28. Brahmer J,
    29. Eberhardt WEE
    : Nivolumab versus docetaxel in previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Two-year outcomes from two randomized, open-label, phase III Trials (CheckMate 017 and CheckMate 057). J Clin Oncol 35: 3924-3933, 2017. PMID: 29023213. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.3062
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Wolchok JD,
    2. Chiarion-Sileni V,
    3. Gonzalez R,
    4. Rutkowski P,
    5. Grob J-J,
    6. Cowey CL,
    7. Lao CD,
    8. Wagstaff J,
    9. Schadendorf D,
    10. Ferrucci PF,
    11. Smylie M,
    12. Dummer R,
    13. Hill A,
    14. Hogg D,
    15. Haanen J,
    16. Carlino MS,
    17. Bechter O,
    18. Maio M,
    19. Marquez-Rodas I,
    20. Guidoboni M,
    21. McArthur G,
    22. Lebbé C,
    23. Ascierto PA,
    24. Long GV,
    25. Cebon J,
    26. Sosman J,
    27. Postow MA,
    28. Callahan MK,
    29. Walker D,
    30. Rollin L,
    31. Bhore R,
    32. Hodi FS,
    33. Larkin J
    : Overall survival with combined nivolumab and ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med 377: 1345-1356, 2017. PMID: 28889792. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1709684
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kang YK,
    2. Boku N,
    3. Satoh T,
    4. Ryu MH,
    5. Chao Y,
    6. Kato K,
    7. Chung HC,
    8. Chen JS,
    9. Muro K,
    10. Kang WK,
    11. Yeh KH,
    12. Yoshikawa T,
    13. Oh SC,
    14. Bai LY,
    15. Tamura T,
    16. Lee KW,
    17. Hamamoto Y,
    18. Kim JG,
    19. Chin K,
    20. Oh DY,
    21. Minashi K,
    22. Cho JY,
    23. Tsuda M,
    24. Chen LT
    : Nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer refractory to, or intolerant of, at least two previous chemotherapy regimens (ONO-4538-12, ATTRACTION-2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 390: 2461-2471, 2017. PMID: 28993052. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31827-5
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hammers HJ,
    2. Plimack ER,
    3. Infante JR,
    4. Rini BI,
    5. McDermott DF,
    6. Lewis LD,
    7. Voss MH,
    8. Sharma P,
    9. Pal SK,
    10. Abdul Razak AR,
    11. Kollmannsberger C,
    12. Heng DYC,
    13. Spratlin J,
    14. Brent McHenry M,
    15. Amin A
    : Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with ipilimumab in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: The checkmate 016 study. J Clin Oncol 35: 3851-3858, 2017. PMID: 28678668. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1985
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Gadducci A,
    2. Guerrieri ME
    : Immune checkpoint inhibitors in gynecological cancers: update of literature and perspectives of clinical research. Anticancer Res 37: 5955-5965, 2017. PMID: 29061774. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12042
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Doi T,
    2. Piha-Paul SA,
    3. Jalal SI,
    4. Saraf S,
    5. Lunceford J,
    6. Koshiji M,
    7. Bennouna J
    : Safety and antitumor activity of the anti-programmed death-1 antibody pembrolizumab in patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 36: 61-67, 2018. PMID: 29116900. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2017.74.9846
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Blake SJ,
    3. Yong MCR,
    4. Harjunpää H,
    5. Ngiow SF,
    6. Takeda K,
    7. Young A,
    8. O'Donnell JS,
    9. Allen S,
    10. Smyth MJ,
    11. Teng MWL
    : Improved efficacy of neoadjuvant compared to adjuvant immunotherapy to eradicate metastatic disease. Cancer Discov 6: 1382-1399, 2016. PMID: 27663893. DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-16-0577
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Eggermont A,
    2. Blank C,
    3. Mandala M,
    4. Long G,
    5. Atkinson V,
    6. Dalle S,
    7. Haydon A,
    8. Lichinirser M,
    9. Khattak A,
    10. Carlino M,
    11. Sandhu S,
    12. Larkin J,
    13. Puig S,
    14. Ascierto P,
    15. Rutkowski P,
    16. Schadendorf D,
    17. Koomstra R,
    18. Hernandez L,
    19. Maio M,
    20. Eertwegh A,
    21. Gorb J-J,
    22. Gutzmer R,
    23. Jamal R,
    24. Lorigan P,
    25. Ibrahim N,
    26. Marreaud S,
    27. Akkooi A,
    28. Suciu S,
    29. Robert C
    : Adjuvant pembrolizumab versus placebo in resected stage III melanoma. N Engl J Med 378: 1789-1801, 2018. PMID: 29658430. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1802357
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  12. ↵
    1. Forde PM,
    2. Chaft JE,
    3. Smith KN,
    4. Anagnostou V,
    5. Cottrell TR,
    6. Hellmann MD,
    7. Zahurak M,
    8. Yang SC,
    9. Jones DR,
    10. Broderick S,
    11. Battafarano RJ,
    12. Velez MJ,
    13. Rekhtman N,
    14. Olah Z,
    15. Naidoo J,
    16. Marrone KA,
    17. Verde F,
    18. Guo H,
    19. Zhang J,
    20. Caushi JX,
    21. Chan HY,
    22. Sidhom J-W,
    23. Scharpf RB,
    24. White J,
    25. Gabrielson E,
    26. Wang H,
    27. Rosner GL,
    28. Rusch V,
    29. Wolchok JD,
    30. Merghoub T,
    31. Taube JM,
    32. Velculescu VE,
    33. Topalian SL,
    34. Brahmer JR,
    35. Pardoll DM
    : Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade in resectable lung cancer TL - 378. N Engl J Med 378: 1976-1986, 2018. PMID: 29658848. DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1716078
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  13. ↵
    1. Tang J,
    2. Shalabi A,
    3. Hubbard-Lucey VM
    : Comprehensive analysis of the clinical immuno-oncology landscape. Ann Oncol 29: 84-91, 2018. PMID: 25581449. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx755
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Ng HY,
    2. Li J,
    3. Tao L,
    4. Mun J,
    5. Ko Y,
    6. Yu VZ
    : Chemotherapeutic treatments increase PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma through EGFR/ERK activation. Transl Oncol 11: 1323-1333, 2018. PMID: 30172884. DOI: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.08.005
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Teng MWL,
    2. Ngiow SF,
    3. Ribas A,
    4. Smyth MJ
    : Classifying cancers based on Tcell infiltration and PD-L1. Cancer Res 75: 2139-2145, 2016. PMID: 25977340. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0255.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Tsutsumi S,
    2. Saeki H,
    3. Yuichiro N,
    4. Ito S,
    5. Oki E,
    6. Morita M,
    7. Oda Y,
    8. Okano S,
    9. Maehara Y
    : Programmed death-ligand 1 expression at tumor invasive front is associated with epithelial-mesenchymal transition and poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Sci 108: 1119-1127, 2017. PMID: 28294486. DOI: 10.1111/cas.13237
    OpenUrl
    1. Zhang W,
    2. Pang Q,
    3. Zhang X,
    4. Yan C,
    5. Wang Q,
    6. Yang J,
    7. Yu S,
    8. Liu X,
    9. Pan Y,
    10. Yuan Z,
    11. Wang P,
    12. Xiao Z
    : Programmed death-ligand 1 is prognostic factor in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and is associated with epidermal growth factor receptor. Cancer Sci 108: 590-597, 2017. PMID: 28192623. DOI: 10.1111/cas.13197
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Rong L,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Hui Z,
    4. Zhao Z,
    5. Zhang Y,
    6. Wang B,
    7. Yuan Y,
    8. Li W,
    9. Guo L,
    10. Ying J,
    11. Song Y,
    12. Wang L,
    13. Zhou Z,
    14. Xue L,
    15. Lu N
    : PD-L1 expression and its clinicopathological correlation in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in a Chinese population. Diagn Pathol 14: 1-10, 2019. PMID: 30684971. DOI: 10.1186/s13000-019-0778-4
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Jiang D,
    2. Song Q,
    3. Wang H,
    4. Huang J,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Hou J,
    7. Li X,
    8. Xu Y,
    9. Sujie A,
    10. Zeng H,
    11. Tan L,
    12. Hou Y
    : Independent prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncotarget 8: 8315-8329, 2016. PMID: 28039448. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.14174
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Leng C,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Hua X,
    5. Cui Y,
    6. Ma J,
    7. Wang Z,
    8. Wang W,
    9. Zhang J,
    10. Zhu J,
    11. Wang Q,
    12. Yu Y,
    13. Qin J,
    14. Sun H,
    15. Li H,
    16. Zheng Y
    : Relationship between expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and the antitumor effects of CD8+ T cells. Oncol Rep 35: 699-708, 2015. PMID: 26718132. DOI: 10.3892/or.2015.4435
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Momose K,
    2. Yamasaki M,
    3. Tanaka K,
    4. Miyazaki Y,
    5. Makino T,
    6. Takahashi T,
    7. Kurokawa Y,
    8. Nakajima K,
    9. Takiguchi S,
    10. Mori M,
    11. Doki Y
    : MLH1 expression predicts the response to preoperative therapy and is associated with PD-L1 expression in esophageal cancer. Oncol Lett 14: 958-964, 2017. PMID: 28693258. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.6215
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Tanaka K,
    2. Miyata H,
    3. Sugimura K,
    4. Kanemura T,
    5. Hamadauematsu M,
    6. Mizote Y,
    7. Yamasaki M,
    8. Wada H,
    9. Nakajima K,
    10. Takiguchi S,
    11. Mori M,
    12. Doki Y
    : Negative influence of programmed death-1-ligands on the survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Cancer Sci 107: 726-733, 2016. PMID: 27015293. DOI: 10.1111/cas.12938
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Ando N,
    2. Kato H,
    3. Igaki H,
    4. Shinoda M,
    5. Ozawa S,
    6. Shimizu H,
    7. Nakamura T,
    8. Yabusaki H,
    9. Aoyama N,
    10. Kurita A,
    11. Ikeda K,
    12. Kanda T,
    13. Tsujinaka T,
    14. Nakamura K,
    15. Fukuda H
    : A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (JCOG9907). Ann Surg Oncol 19: 68-74, 2012. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-2049-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Herbst RS,
    2. Soria JC,
    3. Kowanetz M,
    4. Fine GD,
    5. Hamid O,
    6. Gordon MS,
    7. Sosman JA,
    8. McDermott DF,
    9. Powderly JD,
    10. Gettinger SN,
    11. Kohrt HEK,
    12. Horn L,
    13. Lawrence DP,
    14. Rost S,
    15. Leabman M,
    16. Xiao Y,
    17. Mokatrin A,
    18. Koeppen H,
    19. Hegde PS,
    20. Mellman I,
    21. Chen DS,
    22. Hodi FS
    : Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature 515: 563-567, 2014. PMID: 25428504. DOI: 10.1038/nature14011
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Tsuchikawa T,
    2. MD MM,
    3. Yamamura Y,
    4. Shichinohe T,
    5. Hirano S,
    6. Kondo S
    : The immunological impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the tumor microenvironment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 19: 1713-1719, 2012. PMID: 21822560. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-011-1906-x
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Wakita A,
    2. Motoyama S,
    3. Nanjo H,
    4. Sato Y,
    5. Yoshino K,
    6. Sasaki T,
    7. Kawakita Y,
    8. Liu J,
    9. Imai K,
    10. Saito H,
    11. Minamiya Y
    : PD-L1 expression is a prognostic factor in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer treated without adjuvant chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 37: 1433-1441, 2017. PMID: 28314315. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.11467
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Yagi T,
    2. Baba Y,
    3. Ishimoto T,
    4. Iwatsuki M,
    5. Miyamoto Y,
    6. Yoshida N,
    7. Watanabe M,
    8. Baba H
    : PD-L1 expression, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and clinical outcome in patients with surgically resected esophageal cancer. Ann Surg 269: 471-478, 2019. PMID: 29206673. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002616
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Kim IY,
    2. You SH,
    3. Kim YW
    : Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts pathologic tumor response and survival after preoperative chemoradiation for rectal cancer. BMC Surg 14: 1-7, 2014. PMID: 25406793. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-94
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kim HR,
    2. Ha SJ,
    3. Hong MH,
    4. Heo SJ,
    5. Koh YW,
    6. Choi EC,
    7. Kim EK,
    8. Pyo KH,
    9. Jung I,
    10. Seo D,
    11. Choi J,
    12. Cho BC,
    13. Yoon SO
    : PD-L1 expression on immune cells, but not on tumor cells, is a favorable prognostic factor for head and neck cancer patients. Sci Rep 6: 36956, 2016. PMID: 27841362. DOI: 10.1038/ srep36956
    OpenUrl
  30. ↵
    1. Kowanetz M,
    2. Zou W,
    3. Gettinger SN,
    4. Koeppen H,
    5. Kockx M,
    6. Schmid P,
    7. Kadel EE,
    8. Wistuba I,
    9. Chaft J,
    10. Rizvi NA,
    11. Spigel DR,
    12. Spira A,
    13. Hirsch FR,
    14. Cohen V,
    15. Smith D,
    16. Boyd Z,
    17. Miley N,
    18. Flynn S,
    19. Leveque V,
    20. Shames DS,
    21. Ballinger M,
    22. Mocci S,
    23. Shankar G,
    24. Funke R,
    25. Hampton G,
    26. Sandler A,
    27. Amler L,
    28. Mellman I,
    29. Chen DS,
    30. Hegde PS
    : Differential regulation of PD-L1 expression by immune and tumor cells in NSCLC and the response to treatment with atezolizumab (anti–PD-L1). Proc Natl Acad Sci 115: E10119-E10126, 2018. PMID: 30297397. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1802166115
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Horn L,
    2. Gettinger SN,
    3. Gordon MS,
    4. Herbst RS,
    5. Gandhi L,
    6. Felip E,
    7. Sequist L V.,
    8. Spigel DR,
    9. Antonia SJ,
    10. Balmanoukian A,
    11. Cassier PA,
    12. Liu B,
    13. Kowanetz M,
    14. O'Hear C,
    15. Fassò M,
    16. Grossman W,
    17. Sandler A,
    18. Soria JC
    : Safety and clinical activity of atezolizumab monotherapy in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: final results from a phase I study. Eur J Cancer 101: 201-209, 2018. PMID: 30077125. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.06.031
    OpenUrl
  32. ↵
    1. Fehrenbacher L,
    2. Spira A,
    3. Ballinger M,
    4. Kowanetz M,
    5. Vansteenkiste J,
    6. Mazieres J,
    7. Park K,
    8. Smith D,
    9. Artal-Cortes A,
    10. Lewanski C,
    11. Braiteh F,
    12. Waterkamp D,
    13. He P,
    14. Zou W,
    15. Chen DS,
    16. Yi J,
    17. Sandler A,
    18. Rittmeyer A
    : Atezolizumab versus docetaxel for patients with previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (POPLAR): A multicentre, open-label, phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet 387: 1837-1846, 2016. PMID: 26970723. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00587-0
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Tumeh PC,
    2. Harview CL,
    3. Yearley JH,
    4. Shintaku IP,
    5. Taylor EJM,
    6. Robert L,
    7. Chmielowski B,
    8. Spasic M,
    9. Henry G,
    10. Ciobanu V,
    11. West AN,
    12. Carmona M,
    13. Kivork C,
    14. Seja E,
    15. Cherry G,
    16. Gutierrez AJ,
    17. Grogan TR,
    18. Mateus C,
    19. Tomasic G,
    20. Glaspy JA,
    21. Emerson RO,
    22. Robins H,
    23. Pierce RH,
    24. Elashoff DA,
    25. Robert C,
    26. Ribas A
    : PD-1 blockade induces responses by inhibiting adaptive immune resistance. Nature 515: 568-571, 2014. PMID: 25428505. DOI: 10.1038/nature13954
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Ilie M,
    2. Bence C,
    3. Butori C,
    4. Lassalle S,
    5. Bouhlel L,
    6. Fazzalari L,
    7. Zahaf K,
    8. Washetine K,
    9. Mouroux J,
    10. Poudenx M,
    11. Otto J,
    12. Sabourin JC,
    13. Marquette CH,
    14. Hofman V,
    15. Hofman P
    : Comparative study of the PD-L1 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsies of issue for anti-PD-L1 therapeutic strategies. Ann Oncol 27: 147-153, 2016. PMID: 26483045. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv489
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Reprints and Permissions
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Increases PD-L1 Expression and CD8+ Tumor-infiltrating Lymphocytes in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
EIJI FUKUOKA, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA, TOMOKO TANAKA, RYUICHIRO SAWADA, YUTAKA SUGITA, AKIRA ARIMOTO, MITSUGU FUJITA, GOSUKE TAKIGUCHI, TAKERU MATSUDA, TARO OSHIKIRI, TETSU NAKAMURA, SATOSHI SUZUKI, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
Anticancer Research Aug 2019, 39 (8) 4539-4548; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13631
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords