Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Prognostic Significance of LC3B and p62/SQSTM1 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma

JU SEOK KIM, GO EUN BAE, KYUNG-HEE KIM, SANG-IL LEE, CHAEUK CHUNG, DAHYE LEE, TAE HEE LEE, IN SUN KWON and MIN-KYUNG YEO
Anticancer Research December 2019, 39 (12) 6711-6722; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13886
JU SEOK KIM
1Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GO EUN BAE
2Department of Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KYUNG-HEE KIM
2Department of Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SANG-IL LEE
3Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHAEUK CHUNG
4Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAHYE LEE
4Division of Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAE HEE LEE
5The Biobank of Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
IN SUN KWON
6Clinical trials Center of Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MIN-KYUNG YEO
2Department of Pathology, Cancer Research Institute, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: mkyeo83{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Autophagy is a cellular mechanism that recycles cellular components to maintain homeostasis. To investigate the clinical implication of autophagy in gastric cancer, the autophagy markers with autophagosome formation, LC3B and selective autophagy substrate p62/SQSTM1 (P62) were validated. Materials and Methods: LC3B and p62 expression was examined using immunohistochemistry, western blot assays, and reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The relationship of LC3B and p62 expression in gastric adenocarcinomas with clinicopathological parameters, including patient survival, were analyzed. Results: Normal gastric mucosae exhibit no LC3B and p62 expression, while tubular adenoma and gastric adenocarcinomas exhibit variable nuclear or cytoplasmic p62 expression. High LC3B, high cytoplasmic p62, and low nuclear p62 protein expression in gastric adenocarcinomas is positively correlated with poor prognostic factors including survival. Conclusion: Dynamic LC3B and p62 changes are suggested to be involved in gastric tumorigenesis and cancer progression. LC3B and p62 could be used as prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for gastric adenocarcinomas.

  • Autophagy
  • LC3
  • p62
  • SQSTM1
  • gastric cancer
  • prognosis

Autophagy is a natural cell mechanism that removes dysfunctional cellular components. Autophagy is essential for maintaining homeostasis under stressful conditions like starvation, infection, degenerative disease, and cancer (1). Autophagy modulates extracellular matrix degradation and epithelial–mesenchymal transition, and is suggested to play a significant role in tumorigenesis and cancer progression (2, 3). Autophagy has become an attractive target for anti-cancer therapy, and clinical trials are in progress to demonstrate that the modulation of autophagy activity can enhance the efficacy of cancer therapies (4-11). However, autophagy has opposing and context-dependent roles, suggesting its dual properties in cancers (12). Thus, a better understanding of biology and the role of autophagy is required.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide (13). Despite a decline in the overall prevalence of gastric cancer, the treatment of stomach cancer remains challenging. Recurrence or metastasis often occurs even after successful gastrectomy, and the five-year survival rate is approximately 20% for patients with distant metastasis (14). Limited chemotherapeutic agents can only be applied to patients with gastric cancer recurrence or metastasis. Autophagy can be a promising candidate for the treatment of gastric cancer, as it may enhance chemotherapy or overcome drug resistance.

The autophagy-related proteins are known as beclin1, light chain 3 (LC3) A and B, p62/also called sequestosome 1 (SQSTM1), and sirtuin 1 (SIRT1) (15). Among these, LC3B and p62 are widely used autophagy markers for monitoring autophagy activity. LC3B is involved in autophagosome formation, and p62 serves as a selective autophagy substrate, which has multi-domains that interact with autophagy machinery as adaptors for the target cargo (16). The complex regulation of LC3 and p62 is suggested to be related to autophagy activity in cancers (17). The role of p62 needs to be determined in order to interpret its function in relation to autophagy activity, and the up-regulation or down-regulation of p62 can play both tumorigenic or tumor-suppressive roles in cancers (16).

In this study, to investigate the roles of autophagy markers, LC3B and p62 expression in gastric adenocarcinomas, tubular adenomas with low-grade dysplasia, and non-neoplastic gastric mucosae was assessed. LC3B and p62 expression was analyzed in gastric adenocarcinomas as well.

Materials and Methods

Patients and tissue samples. This study was performed on 402 cases of gastric adenocarcinomas, operated at the Chungnam National University Hospital (Daejeon, Republic of Korea), from January 2011 to December 2012. Patients' clinical history, including disease-free and overall survivals, was reviewed. Patients who received preoperative chemo- or radiotherapy were excluded. Cancer stages were determined according to the American Joint Committee TNM criteria in the Cancer Staging System, eighth edition (18). Cases were classified according to the Lauren classification (17) and classified into Epstein Barr virus (EBV)-associated, microsatellite-unstable (MSI), and microsatellite-stable (MSS) types (19). Fifty gastric tubular adenoma and 10 non-neoplastic cases were also included for comparison analyses on gastric adenocarcinomas. Non-neoplastic tissue samples were acquired from tissues located more than 2 cm apart from the gastric adenocarcinomas.

Immunohistochemical staining analysis. Whole sections of gastric adenocarcinoma paraffin-embedded tissue samples were selected and validated in terms of the proper concentration, temperature, and time for immunohistochemistry. Tissue sections on the coated slides were de-paraffinized with xylene and hydrated in serial solutions of alcohol. The sections were heated in a pressure cooker [with 10 mmol/l sodium citrate (pH 6.0)] for 5 min for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase blocking (0.03% H2O2) was performed for 10 min. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C, with following antibodies (Table I); a mouse monoclonal anti-LC3B and p62 antibody and mismatch repair protein (MMR) for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2 antibody. Samples were incubated in a Dako REAL EnVision for 30 min at room temperature, followed by washing. Chromogen was developed for 2 min, after rinsing. Slides were counterstained with Meyer's haematoxylin. Epstein-Barr virus-encoded RNA in situ hybridization was performed to evaluate tumor EBV infection. Human nerve (LC3B), tonsil (p62), gastric mucosa (MMR), and lymph node (EBV) served as positive controls, and a primary antibody was omitted from the negative control.

A total of 402 gastric adenocarcinomas, 50 tubular adenomas, and 10 non-neoplastic gastric tissue samples were used to construct tissue microarrays using 3.0 mm thick sections in diameter where immunohistochemical staining of LC3B and p62 was performed. Staining of LC3B and p62 was scored using digitally scanned files in the ScanScope program (Aperio ScanScope CS System). The scoring system used the Allred et al. method (20). The immunohistochemical expression was categorized as “high” (expression at the median value or more) and “low” (expression at less than the medium value). The interpretation of the MMR expression followed the Rema et al. method (21). Based on the results concerning the MMR protein and the EBV in situ hybridization, 402 gastric adenocarcinomas were divided into EBV-associated, MSI, and MSS subtypes (19). Each sample was examined separately and scored by two pathologists (G.E.B. and M.K.Y.), who were blinded regarding the patients' details. Discrepancies in the scores were discussed to obtain a consensus.

Western blot analysis. Proteins were extracted from 67 pairs of gastric adenocarcinomas (obtainable among above 407 samples) and paired non-neoplastic frozen tissue samples were stored at −80°C in liquid nitrogen using the PRO-PREP TM protein extraction solution (iNtRON Biotechnology, 17081, Kyungki-do, Republic of Korea). One vial (100 mg) from each set of paired samples was obtained and ground using TissueLyser (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Proteins were extracted, and a total 20 μg of protein were separated using 10% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (BIO-RAD®, Mini-PROTEAN TGXTM Gels, 456-1034) and then transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (BIO-RAD, Immun-Blot® PVDF Membrane for Protein Blotting, 162-0177). The membrane was blocked with 2% dry skim milk and incubated with the anti-rabbit monoclonal LC3B (1:1000, L8918, Sigma-aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA) and anti-mouse monoclonal p62 (1:1000, clone2C11, Sigma-Aldrich) antibody. The membrane was incubated in the anti-rabbit IgG, anti-mouse IgG, and H&L chain-specific peroxidase conjugate secondary antibody (CALBIOCHEM, 401353, Darmstadt, Germany) at room temperature for 1.5 h. Protein bands were enhanced by Immobilon® western chemiluminescent HRP substrate (Millipore, WBKLS0500, Burlington, MA, USA). The images were digitalized using a UVITEC Cambridge alliance mini 4M system (UVItec Limited, Cambridge, UK). Mouse brain cell, NBP2-49688 (Novusbio, Centennial, CO, USA), was used as a positive control, and a tissue sample was omitted from the negative control.

Quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Thirty-six gastric adenocarcinomas (obtainable 67 samples) and paired non-neoplastic gastric tissue were obtained from the National Biobank of Korea. One vial (100 mg) of paired samples was obtained and the total RNA was extracted using a QIAGEN kit (Valencia, CA, USA). Reverse transcription was performed with RevertAid H Minus Reverse Transcriptase (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Real-time PCR was performed in a Rotor-Genes Q cycler machine (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) using a Rotor-Genes SYBR Green PCR kit (Qiagen), in a total volume of 20 μl. The LC3B, p62, and GAPDH primers used for PCR amplification (Table II). To correlate the threshold values, from the amplification plots to the copy number, a standard curve was generated, and a non-template control was run with every assay. All samples were run in duplicate, and the average value was used. The relative quantification values of LC3B and p62 in each tissue sample were categorized as high (greater than the paired non-neoplastic tissue value) and low (less than the paired non-neoplastic tissue value) for comparison analyses. Samples with insufficient RNA levels or failed PCR results were excluded.

Statistical analysis. Associations between the LC3B and p62 expression levels, as well as selected clinicopathological parameters for gastric adenocarcinomas, were examined using Spearman rank correlation coefficients and Mann-Whitney U-tests. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used for group comparison. For univariate analysis, overall and disease-free survival curves, with log-rank tests, were generated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariate survival analysis was performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. The statistical significance was set at p<0.05 (SPSS 24.0; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Antibodies for immunohistochemistry.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Primers for quantitative real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Results

Patient characteristics. A total of 402 gastric adenocarcinoma cases were evaluated. The patients' average age was 60.8 years (with a range of 21 to 86 years), and they were predominantly men (male/female=1.9:1). Patients received total gastrectomy (26%) or subtotal gastrectomy (74%). Patients were diagnosed with advanced (56%) or early gastric cancer (44%). Of the patients, 26.6% showed a lymph nodal metastasis, and 1.4% had a distant metastasis. Post-operative adjunctive or systemic chemotherapy was performed in 53% of patients for above-stage IIIB or at the time of recurrence. Gastric adenocarcinomas were classified into intestinal (59%), diffuse (30%), and mixed (11%) types, based on Lauren's classification, and classified into EBV-associated (7%), MSI (13%), and MSS (80%) types, based on Roh's classification (19).

Immunohistochemical expression of LC3B and P62. LC3B and p62 immunostaining showed protein presence in gastric epithelial cells, but not in stromal cells that LC3B exhibited a cytoplasmic punctate pattern (Figure 1A) and P62 exhibited both a nuclear and cytoplasmic pattern (Figure 1B). All non-neoplastic mucosae were found to be negative for LC3B and p62. Gastric adenomas were positive only for p62 in a cytoplasmic pattern, but they were negative for LC3B. Gastric adenocarcinomas showed positive for cytoplasmic LC3B puncta and showed both nuclear and cytoplasmic p62 expressions. Gastric adenocarcinomas were up-regulated LC3B expression, compared with the non-neoplastic gastric mucosae and tubular adenomas (Figure 1C). Gastric adenocarcinomas had up-regulated nuclear p62 expression, compared to non-neoplastic gastric mucosae and adenomas. Gastric adenomas showed significantly higher levels of cytoplasmic p62 than gastric adenocarcinomas. Cytoplasmic LC3B and cytoplasmic p62 levels were positively correlated. Cytoplasmic p62 and nuclear p62 levels were positively correlated.

Prognostic significance of LCB3 and p62 immunostaining. Immunohistochemical expression of LC3B, nuclear p62, and cytoplasmic p62, with the clinicopathological parameters of a total of 402 gastric adenocarcinomas, were assessed (Table III). LC3B expression was positively correlated with advanced cancer, a higher pathologic stage (I-II vs. III-IV), a higher T-stage, and a positive lymph node metastasis. The nuclear p62 expression was positively correlated with early gastric cancer, a lower pathologic stage, a lower T-stage, and a negative lymph node metastasis. The cytoplasmic p62 expression was positively correlated with advanced gastric cancer, a higher T-stage, and post-operative chemotherapy. Overall and disease-free survival analyses were performed with data from 402 gastric adenocarcinoma patients (Figure 2). The Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests showed a significant association of high LC3B expressions, with a shortened overall and disease-free survival (Figure 2A and B). The Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves, with a low expression of nuclear P62, showed a shortened overall and disease-free survival (Figure 2C and D). The Kaplan–Meier overall survival curves, with a high cytoplasmic P62 expression, showed a tendency toward a shortened overall and disease-free survival, but this did not attain statistical significance (Figure 2E and F). In the intestinal subtype, high LC3B expressions showed a significant association with a shortened overall and disease-free survival (Figure 3A). In the diffuse and mixed subtypes, a high LC3B and low nuclear p62 were related with a shortened overall and disease-free survivals (Figure 3C and 3D). In the MSS subtype, high LC3B and low nuclear p62 expressions showed a significant association with a shortened disease-free survival (Figure 3E and F). Cytoplasmic p62 did not attain statistical significance in relation to disease-free survivals for any subtypes of gastric adenocarcinomas. Multivariate analyses, using the Cox's proportional hazard model, were performed and showed that LC3B, nuclear P62, and cytoplasmic p62 immunohistochemical expressions did not reach statistical significance in relation to the overall survival.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Representative immunohistochemical expression levels of (A) LC3B (white arrow: peripheral nerve tissue – the internal control for LC3B) and (B) p62 in normal gastric mucosae, gastric tubular adenomas, and gastric adenocarcinomas. (C) Comparison analysis of the LC3B and p62 expression in the normal gastric mucosa, gastric tubular adenoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma groups.

Western blot assay. To classify the autophagy activity of gastric cancer, western blot assays were performed using 67 pairs of gastric adenocarcinomas and non-neoplastic gastric tissue samples. Comparison expression patterns of cancer and paired non-neoplastic tissue were classified into 4 groups (Figure 4A). The overall and disease-free survivals for the four autophagy activity groups were compared. However, no statistic difference was observed (Figure 4B). Group C and D vs. group A and D were compared in terms of disease-free survival. A tendency toward poor survival in group C+D (autophagy activation) was shown, but this did not attain a prognostic significance.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Correlation between the LC3B, nuclear P62, and cytoplasmic P62 immunohistochemical expressions and clinicopathologic factors in gastric adenocarcinomas. EGC, Early gastric cancer; AGC, advanced gastric cancer; EBV, Epstein Barr virus; MSI, microsatellite-unstable; MSS, microsatellite-stable.

Prognostic implication of LC3B and P62 mRNA levels. LC3B and p62 mRNA levels were examined, and the relative quantitation level was determined for 36 pairs of gastric tissues (Figure 5). The LC3 mRNA expression was elevated in 19 cases (53%), and the p62 mRNA expression was elevated in 25 (69%) cases of gastric adenocarcinomas, compared to non-neoplastic gastric tissue samples (Figure 5A). The associations between the LC3B and p62 mRNA levels, with prognostic implications, were evaluated (Figure 5B). The Kaplan–Meier survival curves and log-rank tests showed that a high LC3B mRNA level was correlated with a tendency toward a worse survival rate, but this did not attain statistical significance. The P62 mRNA levels were not related with disease-free survivals. The LC3B and P62 mRNA expressions were assessed using clinicopathologic parameters (Table IV) and the LC3B mRNA level was related with the diffuse- and mixed-type gastric cancers, but was not related to other factors.

Discussion

Autophagy plays opposing or context-dependent roles in cancers and gastric adenocarcinoma has been evaluated using LC3B and p62 markers (22). In this study, protein expression of LC3B and p62 was found to differ during gastric tumorigenesis. LC3B was not expressed in normal and tubular adenomas, while p62 was expressed in the cytoplasm of tubular adenomas but not in normal gastric mucosae. LC3B was significantly elevated in the cytoplasm of gastric adenocarcinomas with a punctate pattern, and p62 showed both nucleic and cytoplasmic expression patterns in gastric adenocarcinomas. Previous studies showed similar results, i.e., an elevated cytoplasmic punctate pattern for LC3B and elevated nuclear and cytoplasmic p62 expression for p62 in gastric adenocarcinomas (23, 24). The up-regulation of LC3B during tumorigenesis indicates that the LC3B protein expression is elevated in precancerous and cancerous lesions (25, 26). A sequential change in p62 expression was observed that high nuclear and low cytoplasmic p62 expression was found in normal oral epithelia, while low nuclear and high cytoplasmic p62 expression was found in oral cavity cancer (26). p62 expression has been shown to be elevated in many cancers (25 out of 29 different types of cancer), mostly showing a cytoplasmic pattern (27).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier curves according to the immunohistochemical status of (A) LC3B (B) nuclear p62 (C) cytoplasmic P62 expressions in gastric adenocarcinomas with respect to overall and disease-free survivals.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Kaplan–Meier curves according to (A, C, E) LC3B and (B, D, F) nuclear p62 immunohistochemical expressions in the subtypes of gastric adenocarcinomas: (A, D) intestinal type; (B, E) diffuse and mixed types; (C, F) microsatellite-stable types.

In this study, the LC3B and p62 mRNA levels were elevated in more than half of the cases of gastric adenocarcinomas, compared to paired gastric normal gastric mucosae. In previous studies, a higher level of LC3B mRNA has been correlated with the development gastric cancer (28), while lower expression of LC3B mRNA has been correlated with the development of lung and pharyngeal cancers (29, 30). According to data generated from gene expression profiling interactive analysis, p62 mRNA level has significantly higher expression in many cancers, including gastric adenocarcinomas, compared with paired normal tissues (27). The LC3B transcriptional level of cancers showed conflicting results, i.e., upregulation or downregulation was shown to depend on the type of cancer, and the p62 transcriptional level of cancers, including gastric adenocarcinomas, was generally increased. The aberrant cytoplasmic protein expression of LC3B and alterations of the p62 protein localization was found to be involved in carcinogenesis and also related to the type of cancer.

The expression levels of LC3B, nuclear p62, and cytoplasmic p62 were separately evaluated using clinicopathologic factors, including patient survival. High LC3B and cytoplasmic p62 expression was positively correlated with unfavorable clinicopathologic parameters. Conversely, nuclear p62 expression was negatively correlated with unfavorable clinicopathologic parameters. High LC3 and low nuclear p62 protein expression were significantly related to shortened overall and disease-free survival times. Previous studies showed a significant prognostic implication of LC3B and p62 in gastric adenocarcinomas, i.e., that high expression of LC3B and high cytoplasmic p62 is associated with shortened gastric cancer patient survival; however, the nuclear p62 expression was not validated in these studies (24, 28, 31). The pooled results indicate that the prognostic significance of LC3 and p62 is different depending on the type of cancer. Low LC3B expression is related to unfavorable clinicopathological parameters in breast and lung cancers (32-34), whereas high LC3B expression is associated with lower patient survival rates in gastric and hepatocellular carcinomas (35). p62 overexpression is mostly associated with worse prognosis in gastric adenocarcinomas, but not hepatocellular carcinomas (27).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Classification of autophagic activity followed by (A) a western blot assay (representative image) and (B) Kaplan–Meier curves, according to the four subgroups of autophagic activity relating to disease-free survival.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

(A) LC3B and p62 mRNA levels detected by qRT-PCR. The relative quantification values of LC3B and p62 gastric adenocarcinomas, compared to paired normal gastric mucosae. (B) Kaplan–Meier curves, according to the LC3B and p62 mRNA levels in relation to disease-free survivals of patients with total- and intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinomas.

Functional autophagy activity (active autophagosome-LC3B formation with substrate-P62 loss) in cancer was suggested to be more related to poor patient prognosis than impaired autophagy function, especially in early carcinogenesis (26). In this study, a western blot assay was performed to evaluate the autophagy activity in gastric adenocarcinomas. Statistical significance was not attained from the four different autophagy activity groups in relation to their prognostic implications for gastric adenocarcinomas. Autophagy is a tightly-regulated multi-step process (36). Autophagy activity depends on the loss of a substrate-p62 and the formation of an autophagosome-LC3B; thus, the relative balance of LC3B and p62 is important. High LC3B expression in gastric adenocarcinomas is suggested to elevate autophagy activity, thereby supporting tumor survival and leading to poor prognosis. The intracellular p62 level is dependent on both the transcription level and autophagy activity, and a low level of autophagy activity can cause the accumulation of intracellular p62. Elevated cytoplasmic p62 can act as a tumorigenic factor through multiple signaling pathways (16). The nuclear–cytoplasmic movement of p62 is also suggested to play a key role in the regulation of p62, and the function of p62 not only relies on the transcriptional level, but also on distribution of p62 (37). The p62 mRNA level is elevated in gastric adenocarcinomas, and high cytoplasmic p62 and low nuclear p62 expression are positively correlated with an unfavorable prognosis. Even though the function of p62 in the nucleus is largely unknown, the movement of p62 indicates a method to interact with many signaling pathways with their specific domains. Therefore, the simple inhibition of autophagosome formation can be a double-edged sword in inducing oncogenic p62 function (16, 38). Strategies involving the inhibition of LC3B and p62 have been suggested as potential treatments for gastric adenocarcinomas.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Correlation between the LC3B and P62 mRNA level and clinicopathologic factors in gastric adenocarcinomas. EGC, Early gastric cancer; AGC, advanced gastric cancer; EBV, Epstein Barr virus; MSI, microsatellite-unstable; MSS, microsatellite-stable.

Conclusion

Sequential change (elevated or translocation) of LC3B and p62 protein expression in normal, dysplasia, and gastric carcinoma suggests that the autophagic process is dynamically related to tumorigenesis. Accumulated cytoplasmic LC3B protein can reflect activated autophagic activity and lower accumulation of nuclear p62 protein can lead to higher cytoplasmic autophagy substrate with activated autophagy. Both LC3B and p62 showed sequential expression changes during gastric carcinogenesis and have also an impact on cancer progression related to patient survival. Therefore, LC3B and p62 can be prognostic biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets for gastric adenocarcinomas. Further investigation into underlying mechanism of LC3B and p62 regulation is necessary to introduce autophagy modulation as an anti-cancer therapy in gastric adenocarcinoma.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by grants from the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology (2017R1D1A1B04031187), the Bio & Medical Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) & funded by the Korean government (MSIT) (2019M3E5D1A02068558) and Chungnam National University Hospital Research Fund, 2018.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Authors' Contributions

    Conceptualization, M.-K. Y.; Funding acquisition, M.-K. Y.; Investigation, G.E.B., K.-H.K., C.C., and D.L.; Methodology, J.S. K., C.C., D.L.; Project administration, M.-K. Y.; Resources, K.-H. K, S.-L.L., C.C., D.L., and T.H.L.; Supervision, M.-K. Y.; Validation, J.S.K., G.E.B, and M.-K. Y.; Statistical consult, I.S.K.; Writing–original draft, J.S. K., M.-K. Y.; Writing–review & editing, J.S. K., G.E.B., K.-H. K, C.C., D.L., and M.-K. Y.

  • Ethics Approval

    This study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Chungnam National University Hospital and complied with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki (CNUH 2018-03-015). The study was retrospective, and a waiver of consent was approved by the Institutional Review Board. All bio-specimens and data used for this study were provided by the Biobank of Chungnam National University Hospital, a member of the Korea Biobank Network.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with the work presented in this manuscript. Furthermore, the Authors confirm that the funding provided for these studies did not influence the results in anyway.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received November 6, 2019.
  • Revision received November 8, 2019.
  • Accepted November 18, 2019.
  • Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Badadani M
    : Autophagy mechanism, regulation, functions, and disorders. ISRN Cell Biology 2012: 11, 2012. DOI: 10.5402/2012/927064
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Mathew R,
    2. Karantza-Wadsworth V,
    3. White E
    : Role of autophagy in cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 7(12): 961-967, 2007. PMID: 17972889. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2254
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lai YL,
    2. Gong CL,
    3. Fu CK,
    4. Yueh TC,
    5. Tsai CW,
    6. Chang WS,
    7. Hsiao CL,
    8. Yen ST,
    9. Li HT,
    10. Jeng LB
    : The contribution of matrix metalloproteinase-1 genotypes to hepatocellular carcinoma susceptibility in Taiwan. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 14: 119-125, 2017. PMID: 28387651. DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20024
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Frieboes HB,
    2. Huang JS,
    3. Yin WC,
    4. McNally LR
    : Chloroquine-mediated cell death in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma through inhibition of autophagy. Jop 15(2): 189-197, 2014. PMID: 24618445. DOI: 10.6092/1590-8577/1900
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lin YC,
    2. Lin JF,
    3. Wen SI,
    4. Yang SC,
    5. Tsai TF,
    6. Chen HE,
    7. Chou KY,
    8. Hwang TI
    : Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine inhibit bladder cancer cell growth by targeting basal autophagy and enhancing apoptosis. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 33(5): 215-223, 2017. PMID: 28433067. DOI: 10.1016/j.kjms.2017.01.004
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu G,
    2. Fan X,
    3. Tang M,
    4. Chen R,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Jia R,
    7. Zhou X,
    8. Jing W,
    9. Wang H,
    10. Yang Y,
    11. Yin F,
    12. Wei H,
    13. Li B,
    14. Zhao J
    : Osteopontin induces autophagy to promote chemo-resistance in human hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Lett 383(2): 171-182, 2016. PMID: 27702661. DOI: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.09.033
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rangwala R,
    2. Chang YC,
    3. Hu J,
    4. Algazy KM,
    5. Evans TL,
    6. Fecher LA,
    7. Schuchter LM,
    8. Torigian DA,
    9. Panosian JT,
    10. Troxel AB,
    11. Tan K-S,
    12. Heitjan DF,
    13. DeMichele AM,
    14. Vaughn DJ,
    15. Redlinger M,
    16. Alavi A,
    17. Kaiser J,
    18. Pontiggia L,
    19. Davis LE,
    20. O'Dwyer PJ,
    21. Amaravadi RK
    : Combined mtor and autophagy inhibition: Phase i trial of hydroxychloroquine and temsirolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors and melanoma. Autophagy 10(8): 1391-1402, 2014. PMID: 24991838. DOI: 10.4161/auto.29119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rosenfeld MR,
    2. Ye X,
    3. Supko JG,
    4. Desideri S,
    5. Grossman SA,
    6. Brem S,
    7. Mikkelson T,
    8. Wang D,
    9. Chang YC,
    10. Hu J,
    11. McAfee Q,
    12. Fisher J,
    13. Troxel AB,
    14. Piao S,
    15. Heitjan DF,
    16. Tan K-S,
    17. Pontiggia L,
    18. O'Dwyer PJ,
    19. Davis LE,
    20. Amaravadi RK
    : A phase I/II trial of hydroxychloroquine in conjunction with radiation therapy and concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. Autophagy 10(8): 1359-1368, 2014. PMID: 24991840. DOI: 10.4161/auto.28984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Barnard RA,
    2. Wittenburg LA,
    3. Amaravadi RK,
    4. Gustafson DL,
    5. Thorburn A,
    6. Thamm DH
    : Phase I clinical trial and pharmacodynamic evaluation of combination hydroxychloroquine and doxorubicin treatment in pet dogs treated for spontaneously occurring lymphoma. Autophagy 10(8): 1415-1425, 2014. PMID: 24991836. DOI: 10.4161/auto.29165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Marinković M,
    2. Šprung M,
    3. Buljubašić M,
    4. Novak I
    : Autophagy modulation in cancer: Current knowledge on action and therapy. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2018: 18, 2018. PMID: 29643976. DOI: 10.1155/2018/8023821
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Ávalos Y,
    2. Canales J,
    3. Bravo-Sagua R,
    4. Criollo A,
    5. Lavandero S,
    6. Quest AF
    : Tumor suppression and promotion by autophagy. BioMed Res Int 2014: 19, 2014. PMID: 25328887. DOI: 10.1155/2014/603980
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Yiang GT,
    2. Yu YL,
    3. Chou PL,
    4. Tsai HF,
    5. Chen LA,
    6. Chen YH,
    7. Su KJ,
    8. Wang JJ,
    9. Bau DT,
    10. Wei CW
    : The cytotoxic protein can induce autophagocytosis in addition to apoptosis in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. In Vivo 26: 403-409, 2012. PMID: 22523292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Fitzmaurice C,
    2. Allen C,
    3. Barber RM,
    4. Barregard L,
    5. Bhutta ZA,
    6. Brenner H,
    7. Dicker DJ,
    8. Chimed-Orchir O,
    9. Dandona R,
    10. Dandona L
    : Global, regional, and national cancer incidence, mortality, years of life lost, years lived with disability, and disability-adjusted life-years for 32 cancer groups, 1990 to 2015: A systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study. JAMA Oncol 3(4): 524-548, 2017. PMID: 27918777. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.5688
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Zhu B-Y,
    2. Yuan S-Q,
    3. Nie R-C,
    4. Li S-M,
    5. Yang L-R,
    6. Duan J-L,
    7. Chen Y-B,
    8. Zhang X-S
    : Prognostic factors and recurrence patterns in t4 gastric cancer patients after curative resection. J Cancer 10(5): 1181-1188, 2019. PMID: 30854127. DOI: 10.7150/jca.28993
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Qian HR,
    2. Yang Y
    : Functional role of autophagy in gastric cancer. Oncotarget 7(14): 17641-17651, 2016. PMID: 26910278. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.7508
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Islam MA,
    2. Sooro MA,
    3. Zhang P
    : Autophagic regulation of p62 is critical for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci 19(5): 1405, 2018. PMID: 29738493. DOI: 10.3390/ijms19051405
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Lauren P
    : The two histological main types of gastric carcinoma: Diffuse and so-called intestinal-type carcinoma. An attempt at a histo-clinical classification. Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand 64: 1-49, 1965. PMID: 14320675. DOI: 10.1111/apm.1965.64.1.31
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kim SG,
    2. Seo HS,
    3. Lee HH,
    4. Song KY,
    5. Park CH
    : Comparison of the differences in survival rates between the 7th and 8th editions of the ajcc tnm staging system for gastric adenocarcinoma: A single-institution study of 5,507 patients in korea. J Gastric Cancer 17(3): 212-219, 2017. PMID: 28970951. DOI: 10.5230/jgc.2017.17.e23
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Roh CK,
    2. Choi YY,
    3. Choi S,
    4. Seo WJ,
    5. Cho M,
    6. Jang E,
    7. Son T,
    8. Kim H-I,
    9. Kim H,
    10. Hyung WJ
    : Single patient classifier assay, microsatellite instability, and epstein-barr virus status predict clinical outcomes in stage ii/iii gastric cancer: Results from classic trial. Yonsei Med J 60(2): 132-139, 2019. PMID: 30666834. DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.2.132
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Allred D,
    2. Harvey JM,
    3. Berardo M,
    4. Clark GM
    : Prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer by immunohistochemical analysis. Mod Pathol 11(2): 155-168, 1998. PMID: 9504686
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Remo A,
    2. Fassan M,
    3. Lanza G
    : Immunohistochemical evaluation of mismatch repair proteins in colorectal carcinoma: The aifeg/gipad proposal. Pathologica 108(3): 104-109, 2016. PMID: 28195261.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Cao Y,
    2. Luo Y,
    3. Zou J,
    4. Ouyang J,
    5. Cai Z,
    6. Zeng X,
    7. Ling H,
    8. Zeng T
    : Autophagy and its role in gastric cancer. Clin Chim Acta 489: 10-20, 2019. PMID: 30472237. DOI: 10.1016/j.cca. 2018.11.028
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Qiu J,
    2. Li X,
    3. He Y,
    4. Sun D,
    5. Li W,
    6. Xin Y
    : Distinct subgroup of the ras family member 3 (diras3) expression impairs metastasis and induces autophagy of gastric cancer cells in mice. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 144(10): 1869-1886, 2018. PMID: 30043279. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-018-2708-3
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Sun D,
    2. Li X,
    3. He Y,
    4. Li W,
    5. Wang Y,
    6. Wang H,
    7. Jiang S,
    8. Xin Y
    : Yap1 enhances cell proliferation, migration, and invasion of gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 7(49): 81062, 2016. PMID: 27835600. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.13188
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Yang Y-H,
    2. Liu J-B,
    3. Gui Y,
    4. Lei L-L,
    5. Zhang S-J
    : Relationship between autophagy and perineural invasion, clinicopathological features, and prognosis in pancreatic cancer. World J Gastroenterol 23(40): 7232, 2017. PMID: 29142470. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i40.7232
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Liu JL,
    2. Chen FF,
    3. Lung J,
    4. Lo CH,
    5. Lee FH,
    6. Lu YC,
    7. Hung CH
    : Prognostic significance of p62/sqstm1 subcellular localization and lc3b in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 111(5): 944-954, 2014. PMID: 24983366. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2014.355
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Zhu L,
    2. Wang Y,
    3. He J,
    4. Tang J,
    5. Lv W,
    6. Hu J
    : Cytoplasmic sqstm1/ p62 accumulation predicates a poor prognosis in patients with malignant tumor. J Cancer 9(21): 4072-4086, 2018. PMID: 30410612. DOI: 10.7150/jca.26399
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Wang J-Y,
    2. Wu T,
    3. Ma W,
    4. Li S,
    5. Jing W-J,
    6. Ma J,
    7. Chen D-M,
    8. Guo X-J,
    9. Nan K-J
    : Expression and clinical significance of autophagic protein lc3b and emt markers in gastric cancer. Cancer Manag Res 10: 1479-1486, 2018. PMID: 29928144. DOI: 10.2147/CMAR.S164842
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Jiang ZF,
    2. Shao LJ,
    3. Wang WM,
    4. Yan XB,
    5. Liu RY
    : Decreased expression of beclin-1 and lc3 in human lung cancer. Mol Biol Rep 39(1): 259-267, 2012. PMID: 21556768. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-0734-1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Pan X-L,
    3. Ding L-J,
    4. Liu D-Y,
    5. Lei D-P,
    6. Jin T
    : Aberrant expression of beclin-1 and lc3 correlates with poor prognosis of human hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. PloS One 8(7): e69038, 2013. PMID: 23935917. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0069038
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Masuda GO,
    2. Yashiro M,
    3. Kitayama K,
    4. Miki Y,
    5. Kasashima H,
    6. Kinoshita H,
    7. Morisaki T,
    8. Fukuoka T,
    9. Hasegawa T,
    10. Sakurai K,
    11. Toyokawa T,
    12. Kubo N,
    13. Tanaka H,
    14. Muguruma K,
    15. Masaichi O,
    16. Hirakawa K
    : Clinicopathological correlations of autophagy-related proteins lc3, beclin 1 and p62 in gastric cancer. Anticancer Res 36(1): 129-136, 2016. PMID: 26722036.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. He Y,
    2. Zhao X,
    3. Subahan NR,
    4. Fan L,
    5. Gao J,
    6. Chen H
    : The prognostic value of autophagy-related markers beclin-1 and microtubule-associated protein light chain 3b in cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 35(8): 7317-7326, 2014. PMID: 24838948. DOI: 10.1007/s13277-014-2060-4
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schlafli AM,
    2. Adams O,
    3. Galvan JA,
    4. Gugger M,
    5. Savic S,
    6. Bubendorf L,
    7. Schmid RA,
    8. Becker KF,
    9. Tschan MP,
    10. Langer R,
    11. Berezowska S
    : Prognostic value of the autophagy markers lc3 and p62/sqstm1 in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Oncotarget 7(26): 39544-39555, 2016. PMID: 27250032. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.9647
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Ladoire S,
    2. Penault-Llorca F,
    3. Senovilla L,
    4. Dalban C,
    5. Enot D,
    6. Locher C,
    7. Prada N,
    8. Poirier-Colame V,
    9. Chaba K,
    10. Arnould L,
    11. Ghiringhelli F,
    12. Fumoleau P,
    13. Spielmann M,
    14. Delaloge S,
    15. Poillot ML,
    16. Arveux P,
    17. Goubar A,
    18. Andre F,
    19. Zitvogel L,
    20. Kroemer G
    : Combined evaluation of lc3b puncta and hmgb1 expression predicts residual risk of relapse after adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. Autophagy 11(10): 1878-1890, 2015. PMID: 26506894. DOI: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1082022
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Lee YJ,
    2. Ha YJ,
    3. Na Kang Y,
    4. Kang KJ,
    5. Hwang JS,
    6. Chung WJ,
    7. Cho KB,
    8. Park KS,
    9. Kim ES,
    10. Seo H-Y,
    11. Kim M-K,
    12. Park K-G,
    13. Jang BK
    : The autophagy-related marker lc3 can predict prognosis in human hepatocellular carcinoma. PLOS ONE 8(11): e81540, 2013. PMID: 24282606. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081540
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Bortnik S,
    2. Gorski SM
    : Clinical applications of autophagy proteins in cancer: From potential targets to biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 18(7): 1496, 2017. PMID: 28696368. DOI: 10.3390/ijms18071496
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Pankiv S,
    2. Lamark T,
    3. Bruun J-A,
    4. Øvervatn A,
    5. Bjørkøy G,
    6. Johansen T
    : Nucleocytoplasmic shuttling of p62/sqstm1 and its role in recruitment of nuclear polyubiquitinated proteins to promyelocytic leukemia bodies. J Biol Chem 285(8): 5941-5953, 2010. PMID: 20018885. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.039925
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Cai-McRae X,
    2. Zhong H,
    3. Karantza V
    : Sequestosome 1/p62 facilitates her2-induced mammary tumorigenesis through multiple signaling pathways. Oncogene 34(23): 2968-2977, 2015. PMID: 25088198. DOI:10.1038/onc.2014.244
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 39, Issue 12
December 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of LC3B and p62/SQSTM1 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of LC3B and p62/SQSTM1 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
JU SEOK KIM, GO EUN BAE, KYUNG-HEE KIM, SANG-IL LEE, CHAEUK CHUNG, DAHYE LEE, TAE HEE LEE, IN SUN KWON, MIN-KYUNG YEO
Anticancer Research Dec 2019, 39 (12) 6711-6722; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13886

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Significance of LC3B and p62/SQSTM1 Expression in Gastric Adenocarcinoma
JU SEOK KIM, GO EUN BAE, KYUNG-HEE KIM, SANG-IL LEE, CHAEUK CHUNG, DAHYE LEE, TAE HEE LEE, IN SUN KWON, MIN-KYUNG YEO
Anticancer Research Dec 2019, 39 (12) 6711-6722; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13886
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Clinical Significance of PLA2G2A Expression in Gastric Cancer Patients who Receive Gastrectomy and Adjuvant S-1
  • Enhanced Sensitivity to NVP-BEZ235 by Inhibition of p62/SQSTM1 in Human Bladder Cancer KoTCC-1 Cells Both In Vitro and In Vivo
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting AURKB Attenuates Tumor Growth in MYC-driven Lung Adenocarcinoma
  • Novel NOTCH1-unmutated T-ALL Cell Line With Suppressed Growth by Gamma-secretase Inhibitors
  • Beneficial Effects of Combining an Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor With Proton Radiation, OXi4503, or Hyperthermia in a Murine Solid Tumor Model
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • autophagy
  • LC3
  • p62
  • SQSTM1
  • gastric cancer
  • prognosis
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire