Abstract
Background/Aim: To characterize the demographics, tumor staging and treatment of African American (AA) patients diagnosed with melanoma in the United States. Patients and Methods: The National Cancer Database was used to extrapolate data from patients with melanoma between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015. The patients were then further divided based on ethnicity (AAs vs. Caucasians) to compare patient efficacy of treatment. Results: The mean time for AA patients to receive treatment was 20.37 days compared with 11.25 days for Caucasians (p<0.001), while time to surgery was 38.86 days compared to 31.12 days for Caucasians (p<0.001). Moreover, AA race was a predictor of American Joint Committee on Cancer stage greater than II, tumor diagnosed at autopsy, presence of ulceration, and distribution in the extremities. Conclusion: AA patients with melanoma are more likely to have worse tumor staging, treatment delay, treatment at an Integrated Cancer Program, and diagnosis at autopsy.
African American's (AA) have a decreased likelihood of developing melanoma when compared to other ethnicities due to the protective action of melanin (1). The incidence of melanoma amongst AAs is 1 to 1.2 per 100,000 (2). However, melanoma in AA patients is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage due to the difficulty in differentiating between skin tone and cancer combined with lower socioeconomic levels (3, 4). In addition, melanoma survival is lower in AA patients undergoing surgical treatment compared to all other ethnicities (5). Etiologies of these disparities are difficult to assess and poorly understood (1-5). Treatment disparity in minority populations is a debated topic that deserves attention from the scientific community (6). In this study, we aimed to assess the difference in melanoma characteristics, patient population, tumor staging and treatment in AA compared to the Caucasian population. Furthermore, we speculated that significant differences exist between the two populations.
Patients and Methods
This study was considered nonregulated by the institutional review board. The National Cancer Database (NCDB), an initiative driven by the American Cancer Society and the American College of Surgeons' Commission on Cancer that registers 70% of all cancers diagnosed in the USA, was used to extrapolate data (7, 8).
Eligible patients were identified according to the NCDB's variable “Race”. Data were extracted for all patients diagnosed with melanoma between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015. The cohort was then split into two groups based on race: 1) AA or 2) Caucasian. Patients identified with others races, such as Asian or Native American, were excluded as this analysis focused on the comparison between AA patients and Caucasian patients, the largest cohort of patients with melanoma.
Data was extracted on patient demographics, facility/treatment type, and tumor characteristics. Patients demographics included age, sex, insurance (Uninsured, Private, Medicaid, Medicare, Other Government, Unknown), and population density (Metro, Urban, Rural, Unknown). Facility/treatment characteristics included facility type, region, days between diagnosis and treatment, and days to discharge (after most-definitive surgical procedure). Tumor characteristics included invasive behavior, Breslow depth, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, and presence of ulceration.
Patient demographic and clinical data by race.
Patient demographics, facility/treatment type, and tumor characteristics were described and analyzed using χ2 or t-test, as appropriate. Multivariate analyses were performed using logistic regression models to assess independent associations, adjusting for confounders. Multiple analyses were conducted, setting as the outcome variable each facility type, tumor behavior, AJCC tumor stage and diagnosis at autopsy, and predicted variable of AA patients compared to Caucasians. The significance level was set at p<0.05. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS 25.0 statistical software (SPSS Inc.).
Results
A total of 513,855 patients met the inclusion criteria. The analyzed cohort included 3,008 AA patients (0.6%) and 510,847 Caucasians (99.4%). Table I outlines patient demographics and facility characteristics by tumor location. Melanoma in AA patients was significantly more prevalent amongst women and patients who were uninsured or insured by Medicaid (p<0.001). AA patients were found to receive treatment in Comprehensive Community Cancer Programs less frequently compared to Caucasian patients (Table I).
Tumor characteristics and treatment type separated by race are presented in Table II. Invasive behavior, Breslow depth greater than 1.01 mm, and tumor stage II to IV were more prevalent in AA patients (p<0.001). Furthermore, AA patients had a higher frequency of melanomas on the extremities and decreased incidence on the head and neck and trunk (p<0.001). AA patients had a longer time between diagnosis and treatment and between surgery and discharge (p<0.001).
Using multivariate analysis (Table III), we noticed that AA patients had increased odds for melanoma with ulceration (OR=1.687; 95%CI=1.514-1.880; p<0.001), located in the extremities (OR=3.609; 95%CI=3.298-3.949; p<0.001), stage II (OR=1.350; 95%CI=1.299-1.403; p<0.001), stage III (OR=1.398; 95%CI=1.252-1.562; p<0.001), and stage IV (OR=2.6662; 95%CI=2.221-3.095; p<0.001). Moreover, AA patients had significantly higher odds of receiving the diagnosis at autopsy (OR=2.033; 95%CI=1.670-2.475; p<0.001) and being treated in Academic/Research Programs (OR=1.687; 95%CI=1.284-1.506; p<0.001) or Integrated Network Cancer Programs (OR=1.272; 95%CI=1.133-1.427; p<0.001).
Discussion
Cutaneous melanoma is an aggressive cancer that can be deadly if not diagnosed and treated early. It has a higher incidence amongst the Caucasian population, however, in rare instances, it also occurs in AA patients (1). Due to the low incidence of melanoma in AAs diagnosis and treatment is often delayed. Moreover, most public health educational campaigns target causation patients (9). Educating patients and physicians is a critical component to increasing awareness of total skin evaluations especially amongst AAs where they maybe underutilized; these have been shown to be an effective tool at detecting melanoma earlier (10).
Tumor characteristics by race.
Understanding the diversity of presentation amongst different ethnicities for melanoma is fundamental to achieving an early diagnosis and effective treatment. The significance of this study is that it contributes to understanding the demographic and socioeconomical characteristics of this disease and sheds light on treatment disparities between AAs and Caucasian patients.
Our study demonstrated that the age distribution of melanoma among AA and Caucasian patients is similar. However, there is a higher proportion of AA females compared to males; while the contrary is true for Caucasians.
Patients with a lower socioeconomic status are more likely to be diagnosed at advanced stages of melanoma and therefore have a higher mortality (11). Linos et al. studied 29,792 patients with melanoma from California and reported that patients with a lower socioeconomic status were more likely to present with a Breslow depth greater than 4 mm (11). A similar study by Chang et al. showed that a lower socioeconomic status was associated with a lower 5 year mortality even when stratifying for stage at diagnosis (12).
Our results showed that AAs have melanoma that is more likely to be located in the extremities compared to Caucasians that have higher distribution in the trunk, head and neck. The location of cutaneous melanoma can be significant when it comes to the initial identification and earlier diagnosis. While moles on the face and trunk may be more easily identified, acral locations can make diagnosis more challenging for physicians and patients. The location of melanoma in AAs could be a contributing factor to the delay in diagnosis. In a study conducted by Cormier et al. (13), AAs were found to have the worst prognosis when compared to white patients and other minorities (13). They also found that AAs had a 4-fold higher risk of being diagnosed at stage IV disease and were 1.5x more likely to die due to melanoma than white patients (13). This is congruent with our results that show that AA patients were more likely to present at advanced stages of disease when compared to white patients, even when adjusting for cofounders.
Odds of facility type, tumor stage, behavior, ulceration, located in extremity and diagnosis at autopsy for African American patients compared to Caucasians.
The most common and effective treatment for patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma is surgical resection of the lesion (14). Our results showed that AAs are less likely to receive treatment with an increased number of days to surgery. This is in concordance with the results found by Mahendraraj et al. (1), in which they found that AAs were less likely to receive surgical resection when compared to white patients (1). Moreover, a previous study that enrolled 151,154 patients diagnosed with cutaneous melanoma showed that white patients were more likely to receive appropriate surgical treatment compared to AAs (94.5% vs. 86.6%, p<0.05) (5).
The authors recognize several limitations to this analysis. Due to incomplete data of the NCDB we were unable to include histologic subtype and tumor mitotic index. The accuracy of the data found on the database is subject to the accuracy of centers reporting. Wrong input of data can potentially confound significant associations identified. Future directions for research in melanoma are warranted to fully explore which demographic factors are associated with late-stage diagnosis, considering education level, socioeconomic status, and insurance coverage as potential contributing factors.
In conclusion, AAs have significantly higher odds of being diagnosed at a later stage of disease, ulceration, treatment delay and have melanoma located in the extremities. We hope these findings can help guide future multi-institutional studies to design diagnostic and treatment algorithms for patient-specific melanoma care and shed light on the discrepancies that exist.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported, in part, by the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine and Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery.
Footnotes
Authors' Contributions
All Authors contributed to the study design, commented on previous versions of the manuscript, read and approved the final manuscript. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by DJR, ACS and AJF. The first draft of the manuscript was written by DJR and DB.
Conflicts of Interest
The Authors have no conflicts of interest to declare regarding this study.
- Received October 9, 2019.
- Revision received October 23, 2019.
- Accepted October 24, 2019.
- Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved