Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

The Value of CA19-9 After Irreversible Electroporation for Pancreatic Cancer

CHRISTOPHER MÅNSSON, ANDERS NILSSON, JOZEF URDZIK and BRITT-MARIE KARLSON
Anticancer Research November 2019, 39 (11) 6193-6196; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13827
CHRISTOPHER MÅNSSON
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: christopher.mansson@surgsci.uu.se
ANDERS NILSSON
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOZEF URDZIK
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BRITT-MARIE KARLSON
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is an experimental treatment modality for pancreatic cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether percutaneous IRE lowers the CA19-9 level in pancreatic cancer and whether this correlates with improved overall survival. Patients and Methods: Seventy-one patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer or local recurrence after resection were treated. Patients with missing data, metastatic disease and normal serum CA19-9 before IRE were excluded. This left 35 cases for analysis. Results: The median CA19-9 did not decrease in the cohort after IRE treatment (282 U/ml before versus 315 U/ml after; p=0.80). The 25th percentile of patients with the best CA19-9 response had improved overall survival compared to the 25th percentile with the worst response (mean 13.1 versus 8.1 months, respectively; p=0.01). Conclusion: IRE did not lower the level of CA19-9 in pancreatic cancer cases. However, a response in CA19-9 was correlated with improved survival.

  • Pancreatic neoplasms
  • electroporation
  • interventional ultrasonography
  • CA19-9

Pancreatic cancer is a severe disease with poor prognosis even with optimal treatment. It is the fourth leading cause of death from cancer although its incidence is only in the 10th place (1). Several experimental treatment modalities have been tested to try to improve prognosis. Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is one of these and it has shown some promise regarding prognosis for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (2).

Carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) is a molecule that is synthesized in humans by some epithelial cells, among them pancreatic and bile duct cells. It is found elevated in some cancer types, including pancreatic cancer, and is therefore used as a tumor marker for pancreatic cancer in several settings (3). Postoperative normalization of serum CA19-9 after pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer correlates with an improved prognosis compared to an increase or lower but still elevated value (4). CA19-9 can help predict which patients are suitable for resection after induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (5). Pre- and post-treatment CA19-9 can also be used to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy on pancreatic cancer (6).

A study by Lin et al. showed the CA19-9 value after IRE treatment of pancreatic cancer to be lower than before treatment (7). We used IRE as an experimental treatment of pancreatic cancer since 2011 and have published some of our results (8-10). In this study, we analyzed the effect on CA19-9 after IRE in our experience.

The primary aim was to evaluate the response in CA19-9 level after IRE treatment, and the secondary aim was to estimate the impact of CA19-9 response on overall survival.

Patients and Methods

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer, before and after chemotherapy, or with local recurrence after pancreatic resection, were treated. An IRE machine called Nanoknife (AngioDynamics Inc., Queensbury, NY, USA) was used. All patients had histologically proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma and had been discussed at multidisciplinary team conference prior to inclusion. All patients that were referred to our center that met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate. Exclusion criteria was resectable tumor, metastases, implanted electronic devices, ASA-score IV, expected survival <3 months, pregnancy, epilepsy, severe heart disease, and tumor diameter >5.0 cm, for the patients' basic characteristics please see Table I. All treatments were performed percutaneously by ultrasound guiding by the same interventional radiologist. The treatments were performed under general anesthesia with deep neuromuscular block (post-tetanic count of 0). One month after IRE treatment, an ultrasound examination was performed to look for complications and metastases. Pre- and post-treatment CA19-9 levels were measured. The 1-month time point was selected for determining the postoperative CA19-9 level since no chemotherapy was given between the IRE treatment and ultrasound examination at 1 month. Thus, the IRE treatment was the only thing that could have affected the cancer and the CA19-9 level. Since not all pancreatic cancers express CA19-9, those patients that had a normal CA19-9 level before IRE treatment were not included.

The study was approved by the Uppsala Regional Ethics Committee, Uppsala, Sweden (Dnr 2013/254).

Results

During the study period, 71 patients were treated with IRE. Due to missing CA19-9 values for two patients before treatment and 14 patients after treatment, these patients were excluded. The most common reasons for the missing CA19-9 values were early recurrent disease or complications 1 month after IRE treatment. Ten patients had metastases at the 1-month ultrasound and were also excluded from analysis since they most likely had metastases that were undetected prior to the treatment. Thus, in their cases, local IRE treatment was not a factor and their elevated pre-operative level of CA19-9 might have been from these metastases. Ten patients who did not have a pathological CA19-9 level before IRE treatment were also excluded. Data for 35 patients therefore remained for analysis. For a summary of the patient selection procedure, please see Figure 1.

CA19-9 level. There was no decrease in CA19-9 at 1 month after IRE treatment. The median CA19-9 level before IRE treatment was 282 U/ml and after the treatment was slightly higher at 315 U/ml (p=0.80; Figure 2). However, there was a large difference between the patients' response in CA19-9.

Changes in CA19-9. The effect of changes in CA19-9 level after IRE treatment on survival was evaluated. Since a small change in CA19-9 has no clinical implications and the threshold for any effects are unknown, we considered the 25th percentiles with the best and the worst CA19-9 response. This meant a decrease or increase of approximately 50% of the initial CA19-9 value. We found that those with the best response in CA19-9 had an improved mean overall survival of 13.1 versus 8.1 months for those with the worst response (log-rank p=0.01; Figure 3).

Discussion

We cannot confirm the hypothesis that IRE treatment lowers the median CA19-9 as was previously postulated by Lin et al. (7). In fact, in our study, the median CA19-9 level was slightly higher after treatment. The reason for this finding is not clear. It might be that IRE treatment does not affect the tumor in such a way that the CA19-9 value decreases. It may also be that many of the patients, even though they had no radiological signs of metastatic disease, had micro-metastases, which are not affected by the IRE treatment. It may also, in fact, be that in some cases, the CA19-9 level is elevated by IRE treatment.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Basic patient characteristics before irreversible electroporation treatment.

Patients with a decrease in CA19-9 level after IRE treatment had a better prognosis. This implies the use of CA19-9 level before and 1 month after IRE treatment as a prognostic marker. This might indicate which patients are suitable for an aggressive approach with chemotherapy post IRE with the intent of reaching a setting for radical resection. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has investigated CA19-9 as a prognostic marker after IRE treatment. The fact that all patients were treated at a single center by the same interventional radiologist can be seen as positive. The fact that between the two CA19-9 measurements no chemotherapy was given which could have influenced the CA19-9 level can also be seen as positive.

One weakness of the study was not utilizing diagnostic laparoscopy before the IRE treatment, as Martin et al. did (2). Had we used laparoscopy, the results might have been different, since we would have been better able to rule out metastatic disease. Moreover, unlike Martin et al. (2), we performed all procedures percutaneously, not with open surgery. This avoids complications related to open surgery but the open operation is another tool with which to rule out metastases before IRE treatment.

Conclusion

IRE did not lower the CA19-9 level in patients with pancreatic cancer. However, a response in CA19-9 was correlated with improved survival.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

CONSORT diagram showing which patients were included in this study. IRE, Irreversible electroporation.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Boxplot of CA19-9 levels before and 1 month after irreversible electroporation (IRE). The Y-axis represents logarithmic serum CA19-9 (U/ml).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Kaplan–Meier curve showing survival for the 25th percentile of patients with best (decrease, N=9) and worst (increase, N=9) responses in CA19-9 level at 1 month after irreversible electroporation (IRE).

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Mandy Trickett for language editing.

Footnotes

  • Authors' Contributions

    CM: Study design, data collection, statistics, preparation of article, final approval of article. AN: Study design, data collection, preparation of article, final approval of article. JU: Study design, statistics, preparation of article, final approval of article. BMK: Study design, data collection, preparation of article, final approval of article

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    Anders Nilsson has received travel funding for lectures from Angiodynamics, the company that produces the IRE machine.

  • Received September 16, 2019.
  • Revision received September 29, 2019.
  • Accepted October 1, 2019.
  • Copyright© 2019, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Brunner TB,
    2. Seufferlein T
    : Pancreatic cancer chemoradiotherapy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 30(4): 617-628, 2016. PMID: 27644909. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.08.001
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Martin RC 2nd.,
    2. Kwon D,
    3. Chalikonda S,
    4. Sellers M,
    5. Kotz E,
    6. Scoggins C,
    7. McMasters KM,
    8. Watkins K
    : Treatment of 200 locally advanced (stage III) pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with irreversible electroporation: Safety and efficacy. Ann Surg 262(3): 486-494, 2015. PMID: 26258317. DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000001441
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Scara S,
    2. Bottoni P,
    3. Scatena R
    : CA19-9: Biochemical and clinical aspects. Adv Exp Med Biol 867: 247-260, 2015. PMID: 26530370. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-017-7215-0_15
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Xu HX,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Xiang JF,
    4. Wang WQ,
    5. Qi ZH,
    6. Wu CT,
    7. Liu C,
    8. Long J,
    9. Xu J,
    10. Ni QX,
    11. Yu XJ
    : Postoperative serum CEA and CA125 levels are supplementary to perioperative CA19-9 levels in predicting operative outcomes of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Surgery 161(2): 373-384, 2017. PMID: 27838 102. DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.08.005
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. van Veldhuisen E,
    2. Vogel JA,
    3. Klompmaker S,
    4. Busch OR,
    5. van Laarhoven HWM,
    6. van Lienden KP,
    7. Wilmink JW,
    8. Marsman HA,
    9. Besselink MG
    : Added value of CA19-9 response in predicting resectability of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following induction chemotherapy. HPB 20(6): 605-611, 2018. PMID: 29475787. DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.01.001
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Colloca G,
    2. Venturino A,
    3. Guarneri D
    : CA19-9-related tumor kinetics after first-line chemotherapy of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: A monoinstitutional experience. Med Oncol 33(9): 103, 2016. PMID: 27522503. DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0817-x
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Lin M,
    2. Liang S,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Liang Y,
    5. Zhang M,
    6. Chen J,
    7. Niu L,
    8. Xu K
    : Percutaneous irreversible electroporation combined with allogeneic natural killer cell immunotherapy for patients with unresectable (stage III/IV) pancreatic cancer: A promising treatment. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 143(12): 2607-2618, 2017. PMID: 28871458. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2513-4
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Mansson C,
    2. Brahmstaedt R,
    3. Nilsson A,
    4. Nygren P,
    5. Karlson BM
    : Percutaneous irreversible electroporation for treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer following chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(9): 1401-1406, 2016. PMID: 26906114. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.01.024
    OpenUrl
    1. Mansson C,
    2. Bergenfeldt M,
    3. Brahmstaedt R,
    4. Karlson BM,
    5. Nygren P,
    6. Nilsson A
    : Safety and preliminary efficacy of ultrasound-guided percutaneous irreversible electroporation for treatment of localized pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 34(1): 289-293, 2014. PMID: 24403476.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Mansson C,
    2. Brahmstaedt R,
    3. Nygren P,
    4. Nilsson A,
    5. Urdzik J,
    6. Karlson BM
    : Percutaneous irreversible electroporation as first-line treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Anticancer Res 39(5): 2509-2512, 2019. PMID: 31092446. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13371
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 39 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 39, Issue 11
November 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Value of CA19-9 After Irreversible Electroporation for Pancreatic Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Value of CA19-9 After Irreversible Electroporation for Pancreatic Cancer
CHRISTOPHER MÅNSSON, ANDERS NILSSON, JOZEF URDZIK, BRITT-MARIE KARLSON
Anticancer Research Nov 2019, 39 (11) 6193-6196; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13827

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
The Value of CA19-9 After Irreversible Electroporation for Pancreatic Cancer
CHRISTOPHER MÅNSSON, ANDERS NILSSON, JOZEF URDZIK, BRITT-MARIE KARLSON
Anticancer Research Nov 2019, 39 (11) 6193-6196; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13827
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary Synovial Sarcoma of the Bone: A Case Report and Literature Review
  • Melanoma of the Lower Limbs and Hips: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis of Epidemiology and Survival 2000-2019
  • Ganglioside GD2 Expression Is Associated With Unfavorable Prognosis in Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • pancreatic neoplasms
  • electroporation
  • interventional ultrasonography
  • CA19-9
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire