Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Clinical Impact of Histological Heterogeneity in the Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Patients with Colorectal Cancer

KAZUYOSHI HIRAYAMA, MAKOTO SUDOH, HIROKI SHIMIZU, SHINJI FURUYA, YOSHIHIRO AKAZAWA, HIROSHI IINO, KENSUKE SHIRAISHI, HIDENORI AKAIKE, NAOHIRO HOSOMURA, YOSHIHIKO KAWAGUCHI, HIDETAKE AMEMIYA, HIROMITSU KAWAIDA, SHINGO INOUE, HIROSHI KONO, HIDEKI FUJII and DAISUKE ICHIKAWA
Anticancer Research August 2018, 38 (8) 4797-4803; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12789
KAZUYOSHI HIRAYAMA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAKOTO SUDOH
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROKI SHIMIZU
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINJI FURUYA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO AKAZAWA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI IINO
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENSUKE SHIRAISHI
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDENORI AKAIKE
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOHIRO HOSOMURA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIKO KAWAGUCHI
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDETAKE AMEMIYA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROMITSU KAWAIDA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINGO INOUE
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI KONO
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKI FUJII
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAISUKE ICHIKAWA
First Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: dichikawa{at}yamanashi.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of histological heterogeneity in patients with node-positive colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods: One hundred and twenty-nine patients who underwent curative surgical resection for histological node-positive CRC were enrolled. Patients were divided according to the histological heterogeneity in the primary lesion into p-hetero and p-homo groups. The p-hetero group was further divided according to histological heterogeneity in the metastatic lymph nodes into n-hetero and n-homo groups. Results: There were no significant differences between p-homo and p-hetero groups and between n-homo and n-hetero groups in prognosis. However, the recurrence-free survival rate of the n-homo group was significantly lower than that of the n-hetero group in the N2 category. Conclusion: Histological heterogeneity in metastatic lymph nodes may be useful for predicting prognosis, and prognosis in those with histological heterogeneity in a metastatic lymph node is not necessarily poor, even in those of the N2 category.

  • Histological heterogeneity
  • colorectal cancer
  • metastasis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common malignancy worldwide. As in Western countries, CRC has recently increased in many Asian countries in association with the westernization of lifestyle and diet. Recent advances in chemotherapeutics and molecular-targeted treatments have significantly improved the prognoses of patients with CRC. However, patients with advanced CRC frequently have tumor regrowth during intensive chemotherapy or experience relapse even after curative surgery with adjuvant chemotherapies. Therefore, the prognosis of patients with advanced CRC is by no means satisfactory.

Although the mechanism underlying the development of chemoresistance remains unclear, cancer stem cells have an integral role in treatment failure during chemotherapy. In addition, intra-tumor diversity has an important role in chemotherapeutic resistance, and intra-tumor heterogeneity causes resistance to treatment (1, 2). Recent comprehensive genetic analyses revealed that tumors constantly evolve in primary and metastatic lesions, which correlates with malignant potential such as invasion, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Metastatic lesions frequently develop from a sub-clone of the primary lesions but some metastatic lesions consist of multiple sub-clones with different mutational profiles (3, 4). In clinical practice, histological heterogeneity is recognized in various types of cancers (5-8), which correlates with specific clinicopathological features such as lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis (5-10).

In this study, we investigated the correlation between histological heterogeneity and other clinicopathological findings and evaluated the clinical impact of histological heterogeneity in patients with node-positive CRC.

Materials and Methods

Patients and clinicopathological features. A total of 388 patients with CRC underwent curative surgical resection at the University of Yamanashi Hospital between January 2008 and December 2014. All surgical procedures were in accordance with the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines (11). One hundred and twenty-nine patients with histological node-positive CRC who underwent curative resection with lymph node dissection were enrolled. Patients with distant metastases and multiple primary cancers were excluded. Patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy were also excluded. Demographic, clinical, and pathological features were obtained by reviewing medical records. The macroscopic and microscopic classifications of CRC were based on the 8th edition of the Union for International Cancer Control classification (12).

Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy was performed in all patients except those refusing consent. Chemotherapy regimens were selected according to Japanese guidelines. The follow-up program consisted of a physical examination, hematological and blood chemistry panels, and serum tumor markers, such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), every 3 months. Computed tomography (CT) from chest to pelvis was performed at least every 6 months. The study was approved by the Ethical Committee of Yamanashi University (approval no. 1899). Because recurrences were treated by various therapeutic options, such as surgical resection, radiation, or chemotherapy, recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was investigated.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of 129 patients with node-positive colorectal cancer.

Histological heterogeneity of primary lesions and metastatic lymph nodes. Histological type was categorized into two groups: differentiated (well or moderately differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma) and undifferentiated (mucinous or poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma). Patients were classified into two groups depending on the tissue composition of the primary lesion: Homogenous histological type (p-homo) and heterogeneous histological type (p-hetero). The patients with heterogeneous histological primary tumors (p-hetero) were further classified into two sub-groups depending on the histological composition of the metastatic lymph nodes (n-homo and n-hetero).

Statistical analysis. Chi-squared and Fisher's exact probability tests for categorical variables and the Mann–Whitney U-test for unpaired data for continuous variables were performed to compare the clinicopathological characteristics between two groups. The cumulative survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and the log-rank test was used for assessment of differences between prognostic factors. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered significant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the group with homogeneous histological type in the primary lesion (p-homo) and that with heterogeneous histological type in the primary lesion (p-hetero).

Results

Patient characteristics and histological heterogeneity. The characteristics of 129 patients with node-positive CRC are summarized in Table I. The patients included 80 men and 49 women ranging in age from 24 to 85 years (median 69). Among the 129 patients, 51 patients (39.5%) had primary lesions with a homogenous histological type (p-homo), and 78 patients (60.5%) had lesions with various patterns of histological heterogeneity (p-hetero), in which the major histological type was differentiated in 61 patients and undifferentiated in 17 patients. There were no significant differences between p-homo and p-hetero groups in the various clinicopathological factors, except for the major histological type and tumor location. The frequency of differentiated major histological type was significantly higher in the p-homo group than in the p-hetero group. The frequency of right-sided tumors with histological heterogeneity was higher for primary lesions, but the difference was not significant (Table II).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Histology of the primary lesion and metastatic lymph nodes. There were four metastatic lymph nodes in a patient with colorectal cancer with heterogeneous histological type in metastatic lymph nodes. A: Primary lesion, B: metastatic lymph node of differentiated type, C-E: metastatic lymph node of undifferentiated type. Original magnification, A: ×40, B-E: ×12.5.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Comparison of recurrence-free survival by Kaplan–Meier survival method between the group with homogeneous histological type in the primary lesion (p-homo) and that with heterogeneous histological type in the primary lesion (p-hetero). There was no significant difference in the recurrence-free survival rate of the two groups.

Of the 78 patients in the p-hetero group, 27 had histological heterogeneity in their positive nodes, and histology was homogenous in the lymph nodes of the remaining 51 patients even though multiple nodes were involved. Histology was mostly homogenous within each positive node (Figure 1). There were no significant differences between the n-homo and n-hetero groups in terms of main histological type and other clinicopathological factors, except for the Union for International Cancer Control N category: The frequency of N2 tumors was significantly higher in the n-hetero group than in the n-homo group (Table III).

Prognostic impact of histological heterogeneity. The mean and median follow-up durations were 1,176 and 1,290 days, respectively. Recurrences occurred in 19 and 26 patients in the p-homo and p-hetero groups, respectively. The RFS rates were significantly lower for those with more advanced T-and N-factors than for lower T-and N-factors. However, there were no significant differences in any other clinicopathological factor including heterogeneity of primary tumors (Figures 2 and 3).

Further survival analysis of the p-hetero group revealed that the RFS rate of the n-homo group was slightly better than that of the n-hetero group, but not significantly so (Figure 4). In subgroup analyses according to N category, the RFS rate of the n-homo group was significantly lower than that of the n-hetero group for the N2 category, but there was no significant difference in the RFS rate between the n-homo and n-hetero groups for the N1 category (Figure 5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Clinicopathological characteristics of the n-homo and n-hetero groups.

Discussion

Although CRC sometimes comprises several histological subtypes, the influence of histological heterogeneity on disease progression and treatment responses remains controversial. Kotanagi et al. showed that carcinomas with histological heterogeneity in the primary lesion had a higher incidence of lymph node metastasis and a worse prognosis than those without histological heterogeneity (10), and histological heterogeneity correlates with lymphatic progression in various types of cancer (5-8). These findings prompted us to investigate the clinical impact of histological heterogeneity in patients with node-positive CRC.

The undifferentiated major histological type and right-sided location were more frequently observed in the p-hetero group. In general, most CRCs are differentiated, and undifferentiated adenocarcinoma is an independent prognostic factor. However, we analyzed only patients with node-positive, and the RFS of the p-hetero group, including those with undifferentiated histological type, was equivalent to that of the p-homo group. Proximal colon cancer, which comprises mainly poorly differentiated carcinoma, is associated with microsatellite instability and is associated with a good prognosis (13). Once lymph node metastasis occurs, the p-hetero group, which consists mainly of patients with tumor of undifferentiated histological type, may have similar prognosis to the p-homo group.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Comparison of recurrence-free survival by Kaplan–Meier survival method in the group with heterogeneous histological type in the primary lesion (p-hetero). The recurrence-free survival rates were significantly lower for patients with tumor of more advanced T-and N-factors than for those with lower T-and N-factors. There were no significant differences for any other clinicopathological factors. Significantly different at **p<0.01 compared to T1-3 depth of tumor invasion and *p<0.05 compared to N1 by log-rank test.

We analyzed the clinical impact of histological heterogeneity of the metastatic lymph node and its correlation to clinicopathological findings. In this study, 27 out of the 78 cases with a heterogeneous primary tumor (p-hetero) were formed from a single histological subtype in each positive node (Figure 1). Correlation analysis revealed that the more advanced N2 category was more frequent in the n-hetero group, which may affect prognosis. Therefore, we compared prognoses of both groups according to N category. Unexpectedly, for those in the N2 category, the n-homo group had a significantly lower RFS rate compared with the n-hetero group, but there was no significant difference in rate between the groups for the N1 category. In the N2 category, the number of metastatic lymph nodes were defined as more than three. In this category, the metastatic nodes comprised histologically heterogenous metastases from different histological subtypes of primary lesion, and could therefore include e.g. one from differentiated and one from undifferentiated subtype, and two from undifferentiated subtype, making four metastases, defined as N2 in total. Therefore, the N2 n-hetero group could be considered as simply arising from the sum of two different N1 subtypes.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Comparison of recurrence-free survival by Kaplan–Meier survival method between the group with homogeneous histological type in metastatic lymph nodes (n-homo) and that with heterogeneous histological type in metastatic lymph nodes (n-hetero). The recurrence-free survival rate of the n-homo group was slightly better than that of the n-hetero group, but there was no significant difference.

Patients with advanced CRC, such as N2, have extremely poor prognosis. However, the development of intensive adjuvant multidrug chemotherapy may reduce the recurrence rate in this group. Our findings suggest that patients with n-hetero CRC may be candidates for intensive adjuvant multidrug chemotherapy, even those in the N2 category.

In conclusion, histological heterogeneity of metastatic lymph nodes may be useful for predicting prognosis, and the prognosis of patients with histological heterogeneity in a metastatic lymph node is not necessarily poor, even for those in the N2 category.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Comparison of survival curves by the Kaplan–Meier survival method between the group with homogeneous histological type in metastatic lymph nodes (n-homo) and that with heterogeneous histological type in metastatic lymph nodes (n-hetero). The recurrence-free survival rate of the n-homo group was significantly lower than that of the n-hetero group for those of the N2 category, but there was no significant difference in the rate between the n-homo and n-hetero groups in the N1 category. *Significantly different at p<0.05 compared to N2 of n-hetero group by log-rank test.

  • Received June 16, 2018.
  • Revision received June 29, 2018.
  • Accepted July 4, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Burrell RA,
    2. Swanton C
    : Tumour heterogeneity and the evolution of polyclonal drug resistance. Mol Oncol 8: 1095-1111, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bozic I,
    2. Nowak MA
    : Timing and heterogeneity of mutations associated with drug resistance in metastatic cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 15964-15968, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Jamal-Hanjani M,
    2. Wilson GA,
    3. McGranahan N,
    4. Birkbak NJ,
    5. Watkins TBK,
    6. Veeriah S,
    7. Shafi S,
    8. Johnson DH,
    9. Mitter R,
    10. Rosenthal R,
    11. Salm M,
    12. Horswell S,
    13. Escurero M,
    14. Matthews N,
    15. Rowan A,
    16. Chambers T,
    17. Moore DA,
    18. Turajlic S,
    19. Xu H,
    20. Lee SM,
    21. Forster MD,
    22. Ahmad T,
    23. Hiley CT,
    24. Abbosh C,
    25. Falzon M,
    26. Borg E,
    27. Marafioti BT,
    28. Lawrence D,
    29. Hayward M,
    30. Kolvekar S,
    31. Panagiotopoulos N,
    32. Janes SM,
    33. Thakrar R,
    34. Ahmed A,
    35. Blackhall F,
    36. Summers Y,
    37. Shah R,
    38. Joseph L,
    39. Quinn AM,
    40. Crosbie PA,
    41. Naidu B,
    42. Middleton G,
    43. Langman G,
    44. Trotter S,
    45. Nicolson M,
    46. Remmen H,
    47. Kerr K,
    48. Chetty M,
    49. Gomersall L,
    50. Fennell DA,
    51. Nakas A,
    52. Rathinam S,
    53. Anand G,
    54. Khan S,
    55. Russell P,
    56. Ezhil V,
    57. Ismail B,
    58. Irvin-Sellers M,
    59. Prakash V,
    60. Lester JF,
    61. Kornaszewska M,
    62. Attanoos R,
    63. Adams H,
    64. Davies H,
    65. Dentro S,
    66. Taniere P,
    67. O'Sullivan B,
    68. Lowe HL,
    69. Hartley JA,
    70. Iles N,
    71. Bell H,
    72. Ngai Y,
    73. Shaw JA,
    74. Herrero J,
    75. Szallasi Z,
    76. Schwarz RF,
    77. Stewart A,
    78. Quezada SA,
    79. Quesne L,
    80. Loo PV,
    81. Dive C,
    82. Hackshaw A,
    83. Swanton C
    : Tracking the evolution of non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 376: 2109-2121, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Abbosh C,
    2. Birkbak NJ,
    3. Wilson GA,
    4. Jamal-Hanjani M,
    5. Constantin T,
    6. Salari R,
    7. Le Quesne JL,
    8. Moore DA,
    9. Veeriah S,
    10. Rosenthal R,
    11. Marafioti T,
    12. Kirkizlar E,
    13. Watkins TBK,
    14. McGranahan N,
    15. Ward S,
    16. Martinson L,
    17. Riley J,
    18. Fraioli F,
    19. Bakir MA,
    20. Grönroos E,
    21. Zambrana F,
    22. Endozo R,
    23. Bi WL,
    24. Fennessy FM,
    25. Sponer N,
    26. Johnson D,
    27. Laycock J,
    28. Shafi S,
    29. Czyzewska-Khan J,
    30. Rowan A,
    31. Chambers T,
    32. Matthews N,
    33. Turajlic S,
    34. Hiley C,
    35. Lee SM,
    36. Forster MD,
    37. Ahmad T,
    38. Falzon M,
    39. Borg E,
    40. Lawrence D,
    41. Hayward M,
    42. Kolvekar S,
    43. Panagiotopoulos N,
    44. Janes SM,
    45. Thakrar R,
    46. Ahmed A,
    47. Blackhall F,
    48. Summers Y,
    49. Hafez D,
    50. Naik A,
    51. Ganguly A,
    52. Kareht S,
    53. Shah R,
    54. Joseph L,
    55. Quinn AM,
    56. Crosbie PA,
    57. Naidu B,
    58. Middleton G,
    59. Langman G,
    60. Trotter S,
    61. Nicolson M,
    62. Remmen H,
    63. Kerr K,
    64. Chetty M,
    65. Gomersall L,
    66. Fennell DA,
    67. Nakas A,
    68. Rathinam S,
    69. Anand G,
    70. Khan S,
    71. Russell P,
    72. Ezhil V,
    73. Ismail B,
    74. Irvin-Sellers M,
    75. Prakash V,
    76. Lester JF,
    77. Kornaszewska M,
    78. Attanoos R,
    79. Adams H,
    80. Davies H,
    81. Oukrif D,
    82. Akarca AU,
    83. Hartley JA,
    84. Lowe HL,
    85. Lock S,
    86. Iles N,
    87. Bell H,
    88. Ngai Y,
    89. Elgar G,
    90. Szallasi Z,
    91. Schwarz RF,
    92. Herrero J,
    93. Stewart A,
    94. Quezada SA,
    95. Peggs KS,
    96. Loo PV,
    97. Dive C,
    98. Lin CJ,
    99. Rabinowitz M,
    100. Aerts HJWL,
    101. Hackshaw A,
    102. Shaw JA,
    103. Zimmermann BG,
    104. TRACERx consortium,
    105. PEACE consortium,
    106. Swanton C
    : Phylogenetic ctDNA analysis depicts early-stage lung cancer evolution. Nature 545: 446-451, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Shimizu H,
    2. Ichikawa D,
    3. Komatsu S,
    4. Okamoto K,
    5. Shiozaki A,
    6. Fujiwara H,
    7. Murayama Y,
    8. Kuriu Y,
    9. Ikoma H,
    10. Nakanishi M,
    11. Ochiai T,
    12. Kokuba Y,
    13. Kishimoto M,
    14. Yanagisawa A,
    15. Otsuji E
    : The decision criterion of histological mixed type in “T1/T2” gastric carcinoma – comparison between TNM classification and Japanese Classification of Gastric Cancer. J Surg Oncol 105: 800-804, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Lee G,
    2. Choi ER,
    3. Lee HY,
    4. Jeong JY,
    5. Ahn JH,
    6. Kim S,
    7. Bae J,
    8. Kim HK,
    9. Choi YS,
    10. Kim J,
    11. Zo J,
    12. Lee KS,
    13. Shim YM
    : Pathologic heterogeneity of lung adenocarcinoma: A novel pathologic index predicts survival. Oncotarget 7: 70353-70363, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Reid MD,
    2. Balci S,
    3. Ohike N,
    4. Xue Y,
    5. Kim GE,
    6. Tajiri T,
    7. Memis B,
    8. Coban I,
    9. Dolgun A,
    10. Krasinskas AM,
    11. Basturk O,
    12. Kooby DA,
    13. Sarmiento JM,
    14. Maithel SK,
    15. El-Rayes BF,
    16. Adsay V
    : Ampullary carcinoma is often of mixed or hybrid histologic type: an analysis of reproducibility and clinical relevance of classification as pancreatobiliary versus intestinal in 232 cases. Mod Pathol 29: 1575-1585, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Tu SM,
    2. Bilen MA,
    3. Hess KR,
    4. Broaddus RR,
    5. Kopetz S,
    6. Wei C,
    7. Pagliaro LC,
    8. Karam JA,
    9. Ward JF,
    10. Wood CG,
    11. Rao P,
    12. Tu ZH,
    13. General R,
    14. Chen AH,
    15. Nieto YL,
    16. Yeung SC,
    17. Lin SH,
    18. Logothetis CJ,
    19. Pisters LL
    : Intratumoral heterogeneity: Role of differentiation in a potentially lethal phenotype of testicular cancer. Cancer 122: 1836-1843, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Büttner J,
    2. Jöhrens K,
    3. Klauschen F,
    4. Hummel M,
    5. Lenze D,
    6. Saeger W,
    7. Lehmann A
    : Intratumoral morphological heterogeneity can be an indicator of genetic heterogeneity in colorectal cancer. Exp Mol Pathol 104: 76-81, 2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kotanagi H,
    2. Fukuoka T,
    3. Shibata Y,
    4. Yoshioka T,
    5. Aizawa O,
    6. Koyama K
    : The clinical significance of regional variations in histologic differentiation within carcinomas of the colorectum. Surg Today 23: 407-411, 1993.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Watanabe T,
    2. Itabashi M,
    3. Shimada Y,
    4. Tanaka S,
    5. Ito Y,
    6. Ajioka Y,
    7. Hamaguchi T,
    8. Hyodo I,
    9. Igarashi M,
    10. Ishida H,
    11. Ishihara S,
    12. Ishiguro M,
    13. Kanemitsu Y,
    14. Kokudo N,
    15. Muro K,
    16. Ochiai A,
    17. Oguchi M,
    18. Ohkura Y,
    19. Saito Y,
    20. Sakai Y,
    21. Ueno H,
    22. Yoshino T,
    23. Boku N,
    24. Fujimori T,
    25. Koinuma N,
    26. Morita T,
    27. Nishimura G,
    28. Sakata Y,
    29. Takahashi K,
    30. Tsuruta O,
    31. Yamaguchi T,
    32. Yoshida M,
    33. Yamaguchi N,
    34. Kotake K,
    35. Sugihara K
    : Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 20: 207-239, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Brierley JD,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind C
    (eds.): TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Eighth Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 2017.
  10. ↵
    1. Imai Y
    : Poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the colon: Subsite location and clinicopathologic features. Int J Colorectal Dis 30: 187-196, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 8
August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Clinical Impact of Histological Heterogeneity in the Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Clinical Impact of Histological Heterogeneity in the Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
KAZUYOSHI HIRAYAMA, MAKOTO SUDOH, HIROKI SHIMIZU, SHINJI FURUYA, YOSHIHIRO AKAZAWA, HIROSHI IINO, KENSUKE SHIRAISHI, HIDENORI AKAIKE, NAOHIRO HOSOMURA, YOSHIHIKO KAWAGUCHI, HIDETAKE AMEMIYA, HIROMITSU KAWAIDA, SHINGO INOUE, HIROSHI KONO, HIDEKI FUJII, DAISUKE ICHIKAWA
Anticancer Research Aug 2018, 38 (8) 4797-4803; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12789

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Clinical Impact of Histological Heterogeneity in the Metastatic Lymph Nodes of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
KAZUYOSHI HIRAYAMA, MAKOTO SUDOH, HIROKI SHIMIZU, SHINJI FURUYA, YOSHIHIRO AKAZAWA, HIROSHI IINO, KENSUKE SHIRAISHI, HIDENORI AKAIKE, NAOHIRO HOSOMURA, YOSHIHIKO KAWAGUCHI, HIDETAKE AMEMIYA, HIROMITSU KAWAIDA, SHINGO INOUE, HIROSHI KONO, HIDEKI FUJII, DAISUKE ICHIKAWA
Anticancer Research Aug 2018, 38 (8) 4797-4803; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12789
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy of Platinum-based Chemotherapy for Platinum-sensitive Recurrent Ovarian Cancer During PARP Inhibitor Treatment: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Uniformity Between Serological Biomarker Test, Esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy and Biopsy Histology in Triage of Upper Abdominal Symptoms in Gastroscopy Referral Patients
  • Renal Function With Enfortumab Vedotin in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Retrospective Study in Japan
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Histological heterogeneity
  • colorectal cancer
  • Metastasis
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire