Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Cannabinoid Receptor-1 Up-regulation in Azoxymethane (AOM)-treated Mice After Dietary Treatment with Quercetin

VALERIA TUTINO, VALENTINA DE NUNZIO, ANGELA TAFARO, GIUSY BIANCO, ISABELLA GIGANTE, MARIA PRINCIPIA SCAVO, ROSALBA D'ALESSANDRO, MARIA GRAZIA REFOLO, CATERINA MESSA, MARIA GABRIELLA CARUSO and MARIA NOTARNICOLA
Anticancer Research August 2018, 38 (8) 4485-4491; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12752
VALERIA TUTINO
1Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VALENTINA DE NUNZIO
1Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANGELA TAFARO
2Animal Facility, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIUSY BIANCO
2Animal Facility, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ISABELLA GIGANTE
2Animal Facility, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA PRINCIPIA SCAVO
3Laboratory of Personalized Medicine, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROSALBA D'ALESSANDRO
4Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA GRAZIA REFOLO
4Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CATERINA MESSA
4Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA GABRIELLA CARUSO
1Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA NOTARNICOLA
1Laboratory of Nutritional Biochemistry, National Institute of Gastroenterology-Research Hospital, Castellana Grotte, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maria.notarnicola@irccsdebellis.it
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: The expression of cannabinoid receptor-1 (CB1-R) seems to be modulated by bioactive natural components such as the flavonoid quercetin. The aim of this study was to determine in an animal model of induced-colon cancer, whether quercetin inhibits colon carcinogenesis through changes in the expression of CB1-R. Materials and Methods: C57BL/6J male mice were randomly assigned to standard diet or experimental diet supplemented with 0.5% quercetin. Azoxymethane (AOM) (10 mg/kg body weight) or saline solution (PBS) was intraperitoneally injected, once weekly for 6 weeks. Results: The diet supplemented with quercetin induced CB1-R gene expression and protein, inhibiting the protein levels of STAT3 and p-STAT3 (both mediators of cell proliferation). Dietary quercetin also caused a significant increase in Bax/Bcl2 ratio protein expression. Conclusion: The anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of quercetin in AOM-treated mice are mediated by induction of the protein and gene expression levels of CB1-R.

  • Cannabinoid receptor-1
  • quercetin
  • azoxymethane (AOM)-mouse model
  • colorectal cancer

Cannabinoids and their derivatives play a prominent role in physiological and pathophysiological processes of the gastrointestinal tract (1-3). Cannabinoid activity is regulated by the endocannabinoid system (ECS), which is comprised of receptors, such as cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1-R), cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB2-R) and enzymes involved in endocannabinoids synthesis and degradation (4).

Many studies have investigated the effects of ECS in tumor development and progression (4-6). In particular, CB1-R has been shown to exert anti-inflammatory properties, accompanied by reduced proliferation and induction of apoptosis in tumor tissue (1). Several studies have reported a lack of the “protective action” of CB1-R in different types of cancer (7-9), suggesting a role for this receptor in the mechanisms controlling cell growth and proliferation. Previously, we demonstrated that anandamide, an endogenous agonist for CB1-R, inhibited the proliferation of colon cancer cell lines, through the modulation of cell cycle, in particular reducing the number of cells in the S phase (10).

The expression of CB1-R seems to be modulated by bioactive natural components (11, 12) such as flavonoids. Quercetin belongs to polyphenolic flavonoids which are abundantly found in fruits and vegetables (13) and a large number of studies have demonstrated the anticancer properties of quercetin in in vitro and in vivo models (14-16). The daily administration of quercetin in mice has been demonstrated to have an anti-inflammatory effect in intestinal mucosa (17). Diets enriched in quercetin seem to create a pro-tolerogenic milieu in the gastrointestinal tract, able to maintain homeostasis and prevent chronic inflammatory disorders (17, 18). Quercetin has been demonstrated to suppress the levels of pro-inflammatory cyclooxygenase gene expression (COX-1 and COX-2) (19). Since inflammation in the colon is a key pathway in carcinogenesis, all biologically-active molecules able to reduce the inflammatory status of colonic mucosa are considered useful to confer cancer protection.

Our previous study demonstrated that anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of quercetin are mediated by CB1-R in human colon cancer cell lines (11). However, due to the complexity of the tumor microenvironment, these findings should be confirmed in vivo. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine in an animal model of induced colon cancer, whether quercetin inhibits colon carcinogenesis through changes in the expression of CB1-R and cell proliferation mediators.

Materials and Methods

Animals. Forty C57BL/6J male mice (five-weeks-old) were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 experimental groups (n=10 mice per group). Control mice (ST+PBS) were fed a purified AIN-93M standard diet consisting of 12.5% protein, 12% soybean oil, 3% cellulose fiber and injected with saline solution (PBS); the Q+PBS group received the same standard diet supplemented with 0.5% quercetin and PBS by intraperitoneal injection; the ST+AOM group mice received the same standard diet and AOM at concentration of 10 mg/kg body weight by intraperitoneal injection; the Q+AOM group was treated with the diet supplemented with 0.5% quercetin and received AOM by injection. AOM (10 mg/kg body weight) or saline solution (PBS) was intraperitoneally injected once a week for 6 weeks.

Diets were isocaloric and supplied as pellets (Mucedola Srl, Settimo Milanese, Italy). Food intake and body weight were measured weekly during the treatment period (35 weeks). All animals received care in compliance with the ‘Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals’. The procedures relating to animal use were communicated to the Italian Ministry of Health and approved (n° 103/2016-PR).

At sacrifice by cervical dislocation, the entire intestinal tract of all mice was immediately removed and washed with cold phosphate-buffered saline. The small intestine and colon were cut along the mesenteric insertion, placed on a paper strip at 0-4°C and analyzed through a stereomicroscope at ×3 magnification. The number of mucosal lesions were calculated and part of the distal small intestine was immediately put in liquid nitrogen for real-time PCR and western blotting analyses, and the remaining part of the distal small intestine was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin for 24 h and embedded in paraffin in a ‘Swiss roll’ fashion.

CB1-R gene expression analysis. CB1 receptor gene expression levels were evaluated in distal intestinal tissue of mice by real-time RT-PCR method. Total RNA was extracted with TRI-Reagent (Mol. Res. Centre Inc. Cincinnati, OH, USA) following the manufacturer's instructions.

The reactions of RT and real time PCR were carried out using sense and antisense primers for CB1-R and β-actin genes (sense 5’-CCTGGGCTGGAACTGCAA-3’ and antisense 5’-CCGAAGACGTCATACACCATGA-3’; sense 5’-GCCTCTGGTCGTACCACTGGC-3’ and antisense 5’-AGGGAGGAAGAGGATGCGGCA, respectively). The β-actin gene was utilized as an internal control and was chosen as a reference gene. All expression data were normalized by dividing the CB1-R amount by the amount of β-actin. The specificity of PCR products was confirmed by gel electrophoresis.

Western blotting. Total proteins extracted from mice tissue samples were subjected to electrophoresis using SDS-PAGE gel. After the blotting onto a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Milan, Italy), the proteins were probed with the following primary antibodies: anti CB1-R (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti STAT3 and pSTAT3 (Immunological Sciences, Rome, Italy), anti Bax and Bcl2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA) and anti β-actin (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA, USA). A horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was used and the signal of each protein, obtained using the Molecular Imager Chemidoc™ (Bio-Rad Laboratories), was normalized against β-actin expression.

Histological studies. To evaluate the grade of dysplasia, hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections were examined blindly for the operator, respectively at 20× and 40× magnification. Dysplasia was defined as the occurrence of disorganized glandular architecture, depletion of mucin-producing cells and goblet cells, nuclear atypia and increased mitotic activity, and was graded mild, moderate or severe. The further presence of tissue hypercellularity, enhanced cell proliferation and degenerative/necrotic phenomena allow to recognize cancerous lesions, or inflammatory foci if present.

Statistical analysis. The significance of the differences among experimental groups was evaluated by one-way analysis of variance and Tukey's multiple comparison test. Differences were considered statistically significant with a p-value<0.05.

Results

After 35 weeks of dietary treatment, no difference in body weight was found among the experimental groups of mice (data not shown).

AOM treatment exerted a moderate grade of dysplasia, associated with an inflammatory infiltrate in intestinal samples of mice treated with standard diet (Figure 1A and B), whereas no macroscopical intestinal lesion was observed after quercetin treatment and the intestinal mucosa was normal (Figure 1C).

Dietary quercetin significantly induced CB1-R gene expression even if the AOM administration counteracted the effect of quercetin (Figure 2A). Lower levels of CB1-R mRNA were detected in mice treated with AOM when compared to mice injected with saline solution (PBS), (p<0.001, ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test). The quercetin induction effect was more evident for CB1-R protein (Figure 2B), which was expressed at low levels in intestinal tissues of mice fed standard diet (p<0.001, ANOVA and Tukey's multiple comparison test).

To investigate the effects of quercetin on cell proliferation, STAT3 and p-STAT3 protein expressions were evaluated in intestinal tissues of the treated mice (Figure 3A and B, respectively). The results showed that the protein levels of STAT3 and p-STAT3 were decreased in AOM mice after treatment with quercetin when compared to mice fed a standard diet. Higher levels of p-STAT3 protein were observed in mice treated with quercetin and injected with PBS (Figure 3B), demonstrating that the inhibition of p-STAT3 by quercetin was evident in AOM mice.

Figure 4 shows the Bax and Bcl2 protein levels detected in our samples. In AOM mice, dietary quercetin administration reduced the protein expression of Bcl2, causing a significant increase in the Bax/Bcl2 ratio. This finding suggests that the anti-proliferative effect of flavonoid quercetin was mediated by a significant induction of apoptosis in mice intestinal mucosa.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Histological characteristics of distal intestinal tissue with moderate dysplasia (A) and glandular structure mostly conserved with presence of an inflammatory infiltrate (B). Area without macroscopical lesions (normal tissue) (C). Magnification 20× in figures A1, B1 and C1 and 40x in Figures A2, B2 and C2.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

CB1-R mRNA (A) and protein (B) levels in intestinal tissue of 10 mice from each experimental group. A: Data are expressed as molecule numbers of CB1-R mRNA/molecule numbers of β-actin mRNA. B: Data are expressed as CB1-R protein expression levels normalized with β-actin protein expression. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant using ANOVA and Tukey's Multiple Comparison. ST+PBS and ST+AOM=control groups without and with AOM injection; Q+PBS and Q+AOM=quercetin treated mice groups without and with AOM injection.

Discussion

The anti-proliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of quercetin have been confirmed in many studies (20-22), but the novelty of the present study is certainly the finding demonstrating that the flavonoid quercetin protects against tumor formation in a mouse model of CRC, by regulating the protein and the gene expression level of CB1-R.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Western blotting analysis of expression of STAT3 (A) and pSTAT3 (B) proteins in distal intestinal tissue of mice groups. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant using ANOVA and Tukey's Multiple Comparison. ST+PBS and ST+AOM=control groups without and with AOM injection; Q+PBS and Q+AOM=quercetin treated mice groups without and with AOM injection.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Western blot analysis of expression of Bax and Bcl2 proteins (A) in distal intestinal tissue ofmice groups and Bax/Bcl2 ratio protein expression (B). A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant using ANOVA and Tukey's Multiple Comparison. ST+PBS and ST+AOM=control groups without and with AOM injection; Q+PBS and Q+AOM=quercetin treated mice groups without and with AOM injection.

Here, we histologically detected a low incidence of tumor lesions in our tissue samples and this finding is in agreement with other studies demonstrating a different susceptibility of murine species to AOM treatment (23). Several authors have shown that the C57BL/6 strain is among the species more resistant to this carcinogen (24-26) and therefore, the evaluation of histopathological and molecular features, as well as the study of the main genetic and epigenetic alterations involved in AOM induced carcinogenesis are needed in these mice.

In light of the alterations that occur in the pathogenesis of cancer in this experimental mouse model of CRC, the evaluation of CB1-R expression in our samples has confirmed the anti-cancer and cancer preventing action of quercetin. This finding is in accordance with our previous in vitro results, showing a crucial role of quercetin in the regulation of apoptosis, cell cycle signaling and cell migration (11). A role for CB1-R as a negative modulator of cell proliferation in colon cancer has been reported (9, 11). The colonic tumor growth seems to be facilitated by the absence of CB1-R and, in addition, the promoter hypermethylation of CB1-R gene (CNR1) has been demonstrated to contribute to colon carcinogenesis through silencing of the tumor-suppressing CNR1 gene (1, 27).

The role of quercetin as an anti-cancer molecule is also confirmed by its ability to affect p-STAT3 expression, a biomarker of cell proliferation and aggressiveness. The inhibition of p-STAT3 by quercetin detected in AOM mice suggests that this natural compound, biologically active in a tumor-induced system, is able to protect colon tissue from cancer development.

Colon carcinogenesis, having a multistep nature, can be influenced by diet through the use of bioactive molecules able to influence tumor progression (28, 29). Our findings, confirming the preventive role of quercetin in colorectal cancer through CB1-R induction, are of great interest in light of developing novel therapeutic strategies for cancer treatment.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Vito Spilotro for his excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by Italian Ministry with RC/2017 and by “PO Puglia FESR 2007-2013, Asse I, Linea 1.2. Accordo di ProgrammaQuadro in materia di RicercaScientifica. Intervento “Reti di LaboratoriPubblici di Ricerca”. Progetto L.A.I.F.F. - RETE DI LABORATORI PER L'INNOVAZIONE NEL CAMPO DEGLI ALIMENTI FUNZIONALI (codice n. 47)”.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they do not have any conflicts of interest regarding this work.

  • Received June 7, 2018.
  • Revision received June 15, 2018.
  • Accepted June 18, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Wang D,
    2. Wang H,
    3. Ning W,
    4. Backlund MG,
    5. Dey SK,
    6. Dubois RN
    : Loss of cannabinoid receptor 1 accelerates intestinal tumor growth. Cancer Res 68: 6468-6476, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Massa F,
    2. Monoroy K
    : Endocannabinoids and the gastrointestinal tract. J Endocrinol Invest 29: 47-57, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Izzo AA,
    2. Sharkey KA
    : Cannabinoids and the gut: new developments and emerging concepts. Pharmacol Ther 126: 21-38, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Ladin DA,
    2. Soliman E,
    3. Griffin LT,
    4. van Dross R
    : Preclinical and clinical assessment of cannabinoids as anti-cancer agents. Front Pharmacol 7: 361, 2016.
    OpenUrl
    1. Guzman M
    : Cannabinoids: potential anticancer agents. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 745-755, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Di Marzo V,
    2. Bifulco M,
    3. De Petrocellis L
    : The endocannabinnoids system and its therapeutic exploitation. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3: 771-784, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Izzo AA,
    2. Camilleri M
    : Cannabinoids in intestinal inflammation and cancer. Pharmacol Res 60: 117-125, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bifulco M,
    2. Di Marzo V
    : Targeting the endocannabinoid system in cancer therapy: a call for further research. Nat Med 8: 547-550, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Notarnicola M,
    2. Messa C,
    3. Orlando A,
    4. Bifulco M,
    5. Laezza C,
    6. Gazzerro P,
    7. Caruso MG
    : Estrogenic induction of cannabinoid CB1 receptor in human colon cancer cell lines. Scand J Gastroenterol 43: 66-72, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Linsalata M,
    2. Notarnicola M,
    3. Tutino V,
    4. Bifulco M,
    5. Santoro A,
    6. Laezza C,
    7. Messa C,
    8. Orlando A,
    9. Caruso MG
    : Effects of Anandamide on polyamine levels and cell growth in human colon cancer cells. Anticancer Res 30: 2583-2590, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Refolo MG,
    2. D'alessandro R,
    3. Malerba N,
    4. Laezza C,
    5. Bifulco M,
    6. Messa C,
    7. Caruso MG,
    8. Notarnicola M,
    9. Tutino V
    : Anti proliferative and pro apoptotic effects of flavonoid quercetin are mediated by CB1 receptor in human colon cancer cell lines. J Cell Physiol 230: 2973-2980, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Di Francesco A,
    2. Falconi A,
    3. Di Germanio C,
    4. Micioni Di Bonaventura MV,
    5. Costa A,
    6. Caramuta S,
    7. Del Carlo M,
    8. Compagnone D,
    9. Dainese E,
    10. Cifani C,
    11. Maccarone M,
    12. D'Addario C
    : Extravirgin olive oil up-regulates CB1 tumorsuppressor gene in human colon cancercells and in rat colon via epigeneticmechanisms. J Nutr Biochem 26: 250-258, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Erlund I
    : Review of the flavonoids quercetin, hespeetin and naringenin. Dietary sources bioactivities, bioavailability and epidemiology. Nutr Res 24: 851-874, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Ramos S
    : Effects of dietary flavonoids on apoptotic pathways related to cancer chemoprevention. J Nutr Biochem 18: 427-442, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ren MX,
    2. Li YH,
    3. Wu G,
    4. Ren JZ,
    5. Lu HB,
    6. Li ZM,
    7. Han XW
    : Quercetin nanoparticles display antitumor activity via proliferation inhibition and apoptosis induction in liver cancer cells. Int J Oncol 50: 1299-1311, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Hashemzaei M,
    2. Delarami Far A,
    3. Yari A,
    4. Heravi RE,
    5. Tabrizian K,
    6. Taghdisi SM,
    7. Sadegh SE,
    8. Tsarouhas K,
    9. Kouretas D,
    10. Tzanakakis G,
    11. Nikitovic D,
    12. Anisimov NY,
    13. Spandidos DA,
    14. Tsatsakis AM,
    15. Rezaee R
    : Anticancer and apoptosis-inducing effects of quercetin in vitro and in vivo. Oncology Reports 38: 819-828, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Warren CA,
    2. Paulhill KJ,
    3. Davidson LA,
    4. Lupton JR,
    5. Taddeo SS,
    6. Hong MY,
    7. Carrol RJ,
    8. Chapekin RS,
    9. Turner ND
    : Quercetin may suppress rat aberrant crypt foci formation by suppressing inflammatory mediators that influence proliferation and apoptosis. J Nutr 139: 101-105, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Johnson IT
    : Anticarcinogenetic effects of diet-related apoptosis in the colorectal mucosa. Food Chem Toxicol 40: 1171-1178, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Turner ND,
    2. Paulhill KJ,
    3. Warren CA,
    4. Davidson LA,
    5. Chapkin RS,
    6. Lupton JR
    : Quercetin suppresses early colon carcinogenesis partly through inhibition of inflammatory mediators. Acta Hortic 841: 237-242, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Yoshida M,
    2. Sakai T,
    3. Hosokawa N,
    4. Marui N,
    5. Matsumoto K,
    6. Fujioka A,
    7. Nishino H,
    8. Aoike A
    : The effect of quercetin on cell cycle progression and growth of human gastric cancer cells. FEBS Lett 260: 10-13,1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Murakami A,
    2. Ashida H,
    3. Terao J
    : Multitargeted cancer prevention by quercetin. Cancer Lett 269: 315-325, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Nuyen TT,
    2. Tran E,
    3. Nguyen TH,
    4. Do PT,
    5. Huynh TH,
    6. Huynh H
    : The role of activated MEK-ERK pathway in quercetin-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in A549 lung cancer cells. Carcinogenesis 25: 647-659, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. De Robertis M,
    2. Massi E,
    3. Poeta ML,
    4. Carotti S,
    5. Morini S,
    6. Cecchetelli L,
    7. Signori E,
    8. Fazio VM
    : The AOM/DSS murine model for the study of colon carcinogenesis: from pathways to diagnosis and therapy studies. J Carcinog 10: 9, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Suzuki R,
    2. Kohno H,
    3. Sugie S,
    4. Nakagama H,
    5. Tanaka T
    : Strain differences in the susceptibility to azoxymethane and dextran sodium sulfate-induced colon carcinogenesis in mice. Carcinogenesis 27: 162-169, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Papanikolaou A,
    2. Wang QS,
    3. Papanikolaou D,
    4. Whiteley HE,
    5. Rosenberg DW
    : Sequential and morphological analyses of aberrant crypt foci formation in mice of differing susceptibility to azoxymethane-induced colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 21: 1567-1572, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Bissahoyo A,
    2. Pearsall RS,
    3. Hanlon K,
    4. Amann V,
    5. Hicks D,
    6. Godfrey VL,
    7. Threadgill DW
    : Azoxymethane is a genetic background-dependent colorectal tumor initiator and promoter in mice: effects of dose, route and diet. Toxicol Sci 88: 340-345, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hasenoehrl C,
    2. Feuersinger D,
    3. Sturm EM,
    4. Bärnthaler T,
    5. Heitzer E,
    6. Graf R,
    7. Grill M,
    8. Pichler M,
    9. Beck S,
    10. Butcher L,
    11. Thomas D,
    12. Ferreirós N,
    13. Schuligoi R,
    14. Schweiger C,
    15. Haybaeck J,
    16. Schicho R
    : G protein-coupled receptor GPR55 promotes colorectal cancer and has opposing effects to cannabinoid receptor 1. Int J Cancer 142: 121-132, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Notarnicola M,
    2. Tutino V,
    3. Tafaro A,
    4. Caruso MG
    : Antitumorigenic effect of dietary natural compounds is via lipid metabolism modulation in ApcMin/+ mice. Anticancer Res 33: 3739-3744, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Tutino V,
    2. De Francesco ML,
    3. Tolomeo M,
    4. De Nunzio V,
    5. Lorusso D,
    6. Paleni D,
    7. Caruso MG,
    8. Notarnicola M,
    9. Barile M
    : The expression of riboflavin transporters in human colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res 38: 2659-2667, 2018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 38 (8)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 8
August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cannabinoid Receptor-1 Up-regulation in Azoxymethane (AOM)-treated Mice After Dietary Treatment with Quercetin
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cannabinoid Receptor-1 Up-regulation in Azoxymethane (AOM)-treated Mice After Dietary Treatment with Quercetin
VALERIA TUTINO, VALENTINA DE NUNZIO, ANGELA TAFARO, GIUSY BIANCO, ISABELLA GIGANTE, MARIA PRINCIPIA SCAVO, ROSALBA D'ALESSANDRO, MARIA GRAZIA REFOLO, CATERINA MESSA, MARIA GABRIELLA CARUSO, MARIA NOTARNICOLA
Anticancer Research Aug 2018, 38 (8) 4485-4491; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12752

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Cannabinoid Receptor-1 Up-regulation in Azoxymethane (AOM)-treated Mice After Dietary Treatment with Quercetin
VALERIA TUTINO, VALENTINA DE NUNZIO, ANGELA TAFARO, GIUSY BIANCO, ISABELLA GIGANTE, MARIA PRINCIPIA SCAVO, ROSALBA D'ALESSANDRO, MARIA GRAZIA REFOLO, CATERINA MESSA, MARIA GABRIELLA CARUSO, MARIA NOTARNICOLA
Anticancer Research Aug 2018, 38 (8) 4485-4491; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12752
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Docosahexaenoic Acid Potentiates the Anticancer Effect of the Menadione/Ascorbate Redox Couple by Increasing Mitochondrial Superoxide and Accelerating ATP Depletion
  • Streptonigrin Mitigates Lung Cancer-induced Cachexia by Suppressing TCF4/TWIST1-induced PTHLH Expression
  • Atezolizumab Retains Cellular Binding to Programmed Death Ligand 1 Following Aerosolization via Mesh Nebulizer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cannabinoid receptor-1
  • quercetin
  • azoxymethane (AOM)-mouse model
  • colorectal cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire