Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Antineoplastic Actions of Cinnamic Acids and Their Dimers in Breast Cancer Cells: A Comparative Study

MEGAN HUNKE, WUILIAN MARTINEZ, AKSHAY KASHYAP, TREYVON BOKOSKIE, MAHESH PATTABIRAMAN and SURABHI CHANDRA
Anticancer Research August 2018, 38 (8) 4469-4474; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12749
MEGAN HUNKE
1Department of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WUILIAN MARTINEZ
2Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKSHAY KASHYAP
2Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TREYVON BOKOSKIE
2Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MAHESH PATTABIRAMAN
2Department of Chemistry, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SURABHI CHANDRA
1Department of Biology, University of Nebraska-Kearney, Kearney, NE, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: chandras2@unk.edu
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Breast cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in US, which necessitates constant research for medications with minimal adverse effects. The aim of the study was to determine if certain cinnamic acid dimers (CADs) exhibit higher cytotoxicity in breast cancer cells than against non-tumorigenic cells. Materials and Methods: These dimers have not been explored, so far, due to their complex stereochemistry; cavitand-mediated photodimerization (CMP) method was used to produce several CADs, which were tested for cytotoxicity, apoptosis and cell cycle inhibition. Results: CADs such as ferulic acid dimer, 3-fluoro CAD, and 3, 4-difluoro CAD, were found to be more cytotoxic than their parent monomers. The most potent compound, 3-fluoro CAD caused apoptosis and ‘S’ phase cell cycle arrest in cancer cells. Conclusion: This study indicates an avenue for research for developing a novel class of antineoplastic compounds that can be synthesized using an easy, economical method.

  • Cinnamic acid dimer
  • breast cancer cells
  • photodimerization
  • apoptosis
  • cell cycle arrest

In the United States, over 1.7 million new cancer cases are expected to be diagnosed in 2018, and around 610,000 Americans are estimated to die of cancer in 2018 (1). Breast cancer is of specific concern, as it is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in women and is the second leading cause of cancer deaths (2). The trend for breast cancer-related mortality has experienced a sharp decline of 39% from 1989 to 2015 due to early detection and treatment (1). Nevertheless, increased life expectancies, irregular or prolonged menstrual history, genetic predisposition, in combination with current lifestyles involving use of hormone therapies, excessive alcohol consumption, stress, etc. have ensued higher incidences of breast cancer (1). Efficient treatment options need to be investigated to minimize burden on the patient in their path to recovery.

Natural products have been widely researched for their anticancer properties, primarily as chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic agents. Synthetic derivatives of the pharmacoactive moiety of these natural products have also been investigated. Cinnamic acids (CA) are aromatic fatty acid phenylalanine deamination products naturally found in cinnamon, coffee beans, olives, fruits, and vegetables (3). CAs and their derivatives such as ferulic acid, caffeic acid, sinapic acid, chlorogenic acid, and isoferulic acid have been shown to possess antioxidant (4), anti-inflammatory (5), and anti-tumor (1) properties. The cis- and trans-isoforms of CAs have been evaluated regarding their effectiveness in inhibiting invasive lung adenocarcinoma cells (6). Underlying mechanisms for the cytotoxic action of CAs include inhibition of DNA synthesis, suppression of NF-kB activation, production of IL-8, inhibition of histone deacetylase, and antioxidant effects (3).

CAs are modified by gut microbiota to a biologically more active compound (7). Large variations in the cytotoxicity of CA derivatives is primarily due to chemical modifications on the parent molecule. It has been shown that the catechol ring and the hydroxylic group are associated with toxicity, but the effect is further enhanced by substitution of higher number of hydroxylic groups or alkyl chains or esterification of CA (3, 7-9).

Though research on plant-based phenolic compounds and their derivatives has received great attention for chemotherapeutics, so far there are no published reports on synthesis and biological actions of dimeric CAs. A recent report indicated that naturally-occurring eucommicin A (isolated from a Chinese plant), which is a diester of tetrahydroxy-β-truxinic acid (CA dimer), inhibits the growth of cancer stem cells (10). Here we report the cytotoxicity of CADs, synthesized using cavitand-mediated-approach in breast cancer cells. Our hypothesis is that CADs provide a unique class of potent chemotherapeutics against breast cancer cells, that can be synthesized using an efficient and economical synthetic procedure.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Chemical structures of CAD-Ds synthesized by CMP method: (A) 2-chloro CA (B) 3-methyl CA (C) 3-fluoro CA, (D) 4-fluoro CA, (E) 3,4-difluoro CA, (F) Ferulic Acid.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and synthesis of dimers. Media supplements and all chemicals for dimer synthesis were obtained from Millipore Sigma (Milwaukee, WI, USA) or Peprotech (Rocky Hill, NJ, USA). DMEM/F12 media, horse serum, penicillin/streptomycin and GlutaMAX were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Rockford, IL, USA). Fetal bovine serum (FBS) was obtained from ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA). CADs were synthesized using cavitand-mediated-photodimerization method (CMP) as reported earlier (11).

Cell culture and treatment. Breast cancer cells-MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and normal mammary epithelial cells, MCF-10A were purchased from ATCC, and cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. MCF-10A cells were grown in DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 5% horse serum, 20 ng/ml epidermal growth factor, 0.5 μg/ml hydrocortisone, 100 ng/ml cholera toxin, 10 μg/ml insulin, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. MCF-7 cells and MDA-MB-231 cells were grown in DMEM/F12 supplemented with 5% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Treatment (24-72 h) with test compounds was performed using media lacking phenol red, as it interferes with dyes used for analyses.

Cell survival assay. Cells were grown in 96-well plates and treated with different concentrations of CADs and their parent monomers for 24-72 h. Vehicle control wells were treated with equivalent concentrations of acetone used for preparing stock solutions. Cell survival was measured using PrestoBlue dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) as per manufacturer's instructions, and fluorescence was measured at 560/590 nm (ex/em) using a microplate reader and Gen5 software (BioTek Synergy 2; Winooski, VT, USA). Percent change was calculated relative to the average for vehicle control treated cells.

Colony-forming clonogenic assay. Cells were grown in 6-well plates (2000 cells/well) and treated with test compounds for 72 h (time chosen for maximum toxicity). Following treatment period, wells were incubated with media without the test compound. Existing cells were allowed to establish colonies for 7 days. After this, the wells were washed, fixed with methanol for 15 min, and stained with 0.1% crystal violet for 30 min. Stain was removed by immersing and rinsing the plate in tap water, and letting the plates dry overnight. Colonies with 50 or more cells were counted using a stereomicroscope. Survival fraction was calculated for each well using the formula: Number of colonies formed/Number of cells plated.

Apoptosis assay and cell cycle analysis. Cells were grown and treated in chambered slides and apoptosis assay was performed using Alexa Fluor® 488 Annexin V/Dead Cell Apoptosis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) as per manufacturer's instructions. Fluorescent images were taken on confocal laser scanning microscope (Olympus FV3000) and analyzed using NIH ImageJ software. For cell cycle analysis, cells were stained with FxCycle™ PI/RNase staining solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and analyzed using Sony SH800Z Cell Sorter. Percentage of cells in each growth phase was determined using the SH800Z Sony software.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analysis was performed using Graph Pad software (Prism 5.0). All experiments were performed at least three times in replicates. Comparison between two or more groups was performed using one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. Differences were considered to be statistically significant at p<0.05.

Results

Synthesis of CADs. CMP method using cavitands, such as γ-cyclodextrin (γ-CD) resulted in the formation of a single dimer, syn H-H in high yields (~70%). CADs used in this study are listed in Figure 1. The choice of compounds was based on anticancer properties of parent CA monomers: ferulic acid, 2-chloro CA, and 3-methyl CA (12). Fluoro CAs were chosen as they have not been investigated for anticancer effects to our knowledge.

Effect of CAMs and CADs on survival of MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-10A cells. Survival curves in the presence of test compounds were generated for all cell lines upon treatment with CA monomers and CADs. In general, CADs were found to be more effective than their parent monomers, as evidenced by IC50 values in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 (Table I). Some CADs (ferulic acid, 3F CAD, and 3, 4-diF CAD) that had their IC50 values in μM (Tables I, II and III), were explored further. These compounds had at least three-five-fold higher IC50 values when tested in the non-tumorigenic epithelial cell line, MCF-10A. Dose-dependent cell survival curves generated for 3F CAD, 4F CAD, or 3, 4-diF CAD at different time points (24-72 h) (Figure 2) indicated that longer incubation (72 h) caused maximum inhibition of cell growth.

Effect of CADs on colony formation in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. Colony formation using clonogenic assay was used to assess in vitro tumor forming potential of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells in the presence of 3F CAD after 72 h exposure. Compared to vehicle control a concentration dependent inhibitory response in colony formation was observed (Figure 3).

Apoptosis assay and cell cycle analysis. Cancer cell lines were treated with 3F CAD for 72 h, and representative images of MDA-MB-231 cells are provided in Figure 4. The panel on the right is a merged image of apoptotic (green fluorescence, left panel) and necrotic cells (red fluorescence, middle panel). It was observed that while control cells did not exhibit significant apoptosis or necrosis, 25 μM concentration resulted in higher levels of apoptosis, and 50 μM concentration increased both apoptosis and necrosis.

Cell-cycle analysis indicated a proliferative difference between cancer cells and non-tumorigenic cells, as denoted by the higher % of treated cells in the ‘S’ phase (Table IV). Further, 3F CAD caused ‘S’ phase cell cycle arrest, with increasing number of cells in S phase, suggesting inhibition of DNA replication.

Discussion

Cinnamic acid has long been investigated for its biological properties including anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anticancer effects (5, 6, 13). Since parent compounds of CA and its derivatives exhibit low potency, research has been aimed towards synthesizing analogs with substitutions that increase lipophilicity and potentiate its action. A recent report studied the cytotoxicity of CA phenetyl esters and indicated that the potency against squamous cancer cell line was dependent on ionization potential, shape, and size of the CA (14). To our knowledge, we are the first to report the synthesis and chemotherapeutic actions of dimers of CA, which are effective even at half molar concentrations compared to their monomeric counterparts, despite same molecular mass. Only one recent study so far has reported that a natural syn H-H dimer of CA (β-truxinic acid), eucommicin A, extracted from Eucommia ulmoides, exhibits anticancer property (10). They also suggested that the cyclobutane ring is essential for producing these effects. There has been no research so far on synthetic CADs for their anticancer actions. In addition, fluoro-substituted CAs have not been tested as yet for their cytotoxic actions in cancer cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

IC50 values (in mM) in MCF-7 cells. Hyphens represent values >5 mM.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

IC50 values (in mM) in MDA-MB-231 cells. Hyphens represent values >5 mM.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

IC50 values (in mM) in MCF-10A cells. Hyphens represent values >5 mM.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Survival curves of (A) MCF-7, (B) MDA-MB-231, and (C) MCF-10A cells treated with 3-fluoro CAD (3F CAD), 4-fluoro CAD (4F CAD), and 3, 4-difluoro CAD (3,4 diFCAD). Values are represented as average±SEM of triplicate determinations.

The CMP method, used to synthesize the dimers used in our study, confines CA in the cavitand cavity in a specific orientation, thereby increasing photodimerization efficiency. Photodimerization yields four types of dimers: syn H-H, syn H-T, anti H-H, and anti H-T as reported earlier by our group (15-17). We could predominantly obtain the syn H-H dimer using CMP method. A head-to-head (H-H) orientation is favored due to the stabilizing/attractive hydrogen-bonding (between the carboxylic acids of two CAs) and π-π (between phenyl rings of two CAs) interactions.

Amongst the CADs tested, ferulic acid, 3-fluoro CAD, and 3, 4-difluoro CAD were found to be the most cytotoxic to breast cancer cells, with little to no toxicity in non-tumorigenic mammary epithelial cells at the same concentrations. CA monomer and its hydrophilic derivatives exhibit toxicity in the mM range (3, 12, 13, 18), however, most of the dimers tested here had their IC50 in the μM range. Due to the potent action of 3F CAD compared to other compounds tested in the group, it was further explored for inhibition of colony formation, induction of apoptosis, and arrest of cell cycle. Interestingly, 3F CAD suppressed colony formation at a much lower dose than its IC50, as determined earlier by cell survival assay. This is possibly due to the smaller number of cells plated for colony formation, which could enhance toxicity with the compound. Percentage of apoptotic cells also increased at higher concentrations of 3F CAD in both cancer cell types. Representative image with MDA-MB-231 cells is provided. A study found that caffeic acid and ferulic acid (derivatives of CA) inhibit invasion, migration, and adhesion of lung adenocarcinoma cells (19). Another study concluded that propolis CA derivatives induced both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis signaling pathways against human colon cancer cells (20, 21). In human melanoma cells, CA induces apoptotic cell death by disrupting the cytoskeleton (18). Future studies will involve further investigation of the apoptotic pathway.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Colony formation following treatment with 3F CAD at 72 h. Survival fraction values are represented as average±SD of three replicates.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Apoptosis of MDA-MB-231 cells after 72 h treatment with 3F CAD at (A) 0 μM, (B) 25 μM, and (C) 50 μM concentrations. Left panel is green fluorescence representing apoptosis, middle panel is red fluorescence representing necrosis and right panel is merged image representing apoptotic and necrotic cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Distribution of cells in different phases of the cell cycle upon treatment with 3F CAD (72 h).

Cell cycle analysis using flow cytometry revealed that cancer cells have a higher percentage of cells in the replicative ‘S’ phase compared to MCF-10A non-tumorigenic cells. Furthermore, 3F CAD treatment significantly increased the number of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells in ‘S’ phase, which suggests S phase cell cycle arrest. Parent CA monomer has instead been shown to increase the G0/G1 phase and extend the cell cycle in leukemia, K562, HeLa, Fem-x, and MCF-7 cells (22). Future studies will also explore other substitutions in addition to the fluoro compounds examined in this study. The results of our study, as well as previously published research, warrant the potential use of CADs as cancer therapeutics. Our recent publication has shown that CADs also possess antinociceptive properties, which could help decrease pain felt by those undergoing cancer treatment (11). It is imperative to move forward and identify safe compound concentrations for use in vivo against cancer.

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund (# 54862-UR4) awarded to MP for the chemical synthesis. Biological studies were supported by the Great Plains IDeA CTR Pilot Grant (NIGMS #1U54GM115458-01) awarded to MP and SC.

  • Received June 11, 2018.
  • Revision received July 2, 2018.
  • Accepted July 4, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Bezerra DP,
    2. Castro FO,
    3. Alves AP,
    4. Pessoa C,
    5. Moraes MO,
    6. Silveira ER,
    7. Lima MA,
    8. Elmiro FJ,
    9. Costa-Lotufo LV
    : In vivo growth-inhibition of Sarcoma 180 by piplartine and piperine, two alkaloid amides from Piper. Braz J Med Biol Res 39(6): 801-807, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. National Breast Cancer Foundation I
    . Breast Cancer Facts. 2016.
  3. ↵
    1. Su P,
    2. Shi Y,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Shen X,
    5. Zhang J
    : Anticancer agents derived from natural cinnamic acids. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 15(8): 980-987, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Chung HS,
    2. Shin JC
    : Characterization of antioxidant alkaloids and phenolic acids from anthocyanin-pigmented rice (Oryza sativa cv. Heugjinjubyeo). Food Chem 104(4): 1670-1677, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Kim EO,
    2. Min KJ,
    3. Kwon TK,
    4. Um BH,
    5. Moreau RA,
    6. Choi SW
    : Anti-inflammatory activity of hydroxycinnamic acid derivatives isolated from corn bran in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated Raw 264.7 macrophages. Food Chem Toxicol 50(5): 1309-1316, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Yen GC,
    2. Chen YL,
    3. Sun FM,
    4. Chiang YL,
    5. Lu SH,
    6. Weng CJ
    : A comparative study on the effectiveness of cis- and trans-form of cinnamic acid treatments for inhibiting invasive activity of human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Eur J Pharm Sci 44(3): 281-287, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Anantharaju PG,
    2. Gowda PC,
    3. Vimalambike MG,
    4. Madhunapantula SV
    : An overview on the role of dietary phenolics for the treatment of cancers. Nutr J 15(1): 99, 2016.
    OpenUrl
    1. Serafim TL,
    2. Carvalho FS,
    3. Marques MP,
    4. Calheiros R,
    5. Silva T,
    6. Garrido J,
    7. Milhazes N,
    8. Borges F,
    9. Roleira F,
    10. Silva ET,
    11. Holy J,
    12. Oliveira PJ
    : Lipophilic caffeic and ferulic acid derivatives presenting cytotoxicity against human breast cancer cells. Chem Res Toxicol 24(5): 763-774, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Lee YJ,
    2. Liao PH,
    3. Chen WK,
    4. Yang CY
    : Preferential cytotoxicity of caffeic acid phenethyl ester analogues on oral cancer cells. Cancer Lett 153(1-2): 51-56, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Fujiwara A,
    2. Nishi M,
    3. Yoshida S,
    4. Hasegawa M,
    5. Yasuma C,
    6. Ryo A,
    7. Suzuki Y
    : Eucommicin A, a beta-truxinate lignan from Eucommia ulmoides, is a selective inhibitor of cancer stem cells. Phytochemistry 122: 139-145, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Priebe A,
    2. Hunke M,
    3. Tonello R,
    4. Sonawane Y,
    5. Berta T,
    6. Natarajan A,
    7. Bhuvanesh N,
    8. Pattabiraman M,
    9. Chandra S
    : Ferulic acid dimer as a non-opioid therapeutic for acute pain. J Pain Res 11: 1075-1085, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. De P,
    2. Baltas M,
    3. Bedos-Belval F
    : Cinnamic acid derivatives as anticancer agents-a review. Curr Med Chem 18(11): 1672-1703, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Pontiki E,
    2. Hadjipavlou-Litina D,
    3. Litinas K,
    4. Geromichalos G
    : Novel cinnamic acid derivatives as antioxidant and anticancer agents: design, synthesis and modeling studies. Molecules 19(7): 9655-9674, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Uesawa Y,
    2. Sakagami H,
    3. Okudaira N,
    4. Toda K,
    5. Takao K,
    6. Kagaya H,
    7. Sugita Y
    : Quantitative structure-cytotoxicity relationship of cinnamic acid phenetyl esters. Anticancer Res 38(2): 817-823, 2018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Nguyen N,
    2. Clements A,
    3. Pattabiraman M
    : Using non-covalent interactions to direct regioselective 2+2 photocycloaddition within a macrocyclic cavitand. New J Chem 40(3): 2433-2443, 2016.
    OpenUrl
    1. Pattabiraman M,
    2. Kaanumalle LS,
    3. Natarajan A,
    4. Ramamurthy V
    : Regioselective Photodimerization of Cinnamic Acids in Water: Templation with Cucurbiturils. Langmuir 22(18): 7605-7609, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Pattabiraman M,
    2. Natarajan A,
    3. Kaanumalle LS,
    4. Ramamurthy V
    : Templating photodimerization of trans-cinnamic acids with cucurbit[8]uril and gamma-cyclodextrin. Org Lett 7(4): 529-532, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Niero EL,
    2. Machado-Santelli GM
    : Cinnamic acid induces apoptotic cell death and cytoskeleton disruption in human melanoma cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 32: 31, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Tsai CM,
    2. Yen GC,
    3. Sun FM,
    4. Yang SF,
    5. Weng CJ
    : Assessment of the anti-invasion potential and mechanism of select cinnamic acid derivatives on human lung adenocarcinoma cells. Mol Pharm 10(5): 1890-1900, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Akao Y,
    2. Maruyama H,
    3. Matsumoto K,
    4. Ohguchi K,
    5. Nishizawa K,
    6. Sakamoto T,
    7. Araki Y,
    8. Mishima S,
    9. Nozawa Y
    : Cell growth inhibitory effect of cinnamic acid derivatives from propolis on human tumor cell lines. Biol Pharm Bull 26(7): 1057-1059, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kumazaki M,
    2. Shinohara H,
    3. Taniguchi K,
    4. Yamada N,
    5. Ohta S,
    6. Ichihara K,
    7. Akao Y
    : Propolis cinnamic acid derivatives induce apoptosis through both extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis signaling pathways and modulate of miRNA expression. Phytomedicine 21(8-9): 1070-7107, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Sova M,
    2. Zizak Z,
    3. Stankovic JA,
    4. Prijatelj M,
    5. Turk S,
    6. Juranic ZD,
    7. Mlinarič-Raščan I,
    8. Gobec S
    : Cinnamic acid derivatives induce cell cycle arrest in carcinoma cell lines. Med Chem 9(5): 633-641, 2013.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 38 (8)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 8
August 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Antineoplastic Actions of Cinnamic Acids and Their Dimers in Breast Cancer Cells: A Comparative Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Antineoplastic Actions of Cinnamic Acids and Their Dimers in Breast Cancer Cells: A Comparative Study
MEGAN HUNKE, WUILIAN MARTINEZ, AKSHAY KASHYAP, TREYVON BOKOSKIE, MAHESH PATTABIRAMAN, SURABHI CHANDRA
Anticancer Research Aug 2018, 38 (8) 4469-4474; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12749

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Antineoplastic Actions of Cinnamic Acids and Their Dimers in Breast Cancer Cells: A Comparative Study
MEGAN HUNKE, WUILIAN MARTINEZ, AKSHAY KASHYAP, TREYVON BOKOSKIE, MAHESH PATTABIRAMAN, SURABHI CHANDRA
Anticancer Research Aug 2018, 38 (8) 4469-4474; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12749
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Docosahexaenoic Acid Potentiates the Anticancer Effect of the Menadione/Ascorbate Redox Couple by Increasing Mitochondrial Superoxide and Accelerating ATP Depletion
  • Streptonigrin Mitigates Lung Cancer-induced Cachexia by Suppressing TCF4/TWIST1-induced PTHLH Expression
  • Atezolizumab Retains Cellular Binding to Programmed Death Ligand 1 Following Aerosolization via Mesh Nebulizer
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cinnamic acid dimer
  • breast cancer cells
  • photodimerization
  • apoptosis
  • cell cycle arrest
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire