Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

CC-Chemokine Ligand 18 Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Lymph Node-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

SEVERIN SCHMID, AGNES CSANADI, NIKOLA KOZHUHAROV, MARCEAU TCHUDJIN, CLAUDIA KAYSER, JUSTYNA RAWLUK, BERNWARD PASSLICK, MARTIN WERNER, ANTJE PRASSE and GIAN KAYSER
Anticancer Research July 2018, 38 (7) 3913-3918; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12676
SEVERIN SCHMID
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Severin.Schmid{at}uniklinik-freiburg.de
AGNES CSANADI
2Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NIKOLA KOZHUHAROV
2Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
3Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
4Cardiovascular Research Institute Basel (CRIB), University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCEAU TCHUDJIN
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CLAUDIA KAYSER
2Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUSTYNA RAWLUK
5Department of Hematology and Oncology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BERNWARD PASSLICK
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARTIN WERNER
2Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTJE PRASSE
6Department of Pneumonology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GIAN KAYSER
2Institute for Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are key players in the immune response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the main producers of CC-chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18). Our study aimed to analyze the clinical significance of CCL18 expression by TAMs in NSCLC. Material and Methods: Tissue multi-arrays from 243 non-selected patients with NSCLC were constructed. Immunohistochemical double staining for CD68 and CCL18 was performed and the number of CD68+, as well as CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages determined. Results: Comparison of early to advanced lung adenocarcinoma showed significantly more frequent CD68+ as well as CD68/CCL18 double-positive macrophages in advanced disease (p=0.03 and p=0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed a higher proportion of double-positive macrophages to be an independent prognosticator in lymph node-positive NSCLC (hazard ratio(HR)=0.6, 95% confidence interval(CI)=0.35-0.86, p=0.009). Conclusion: In advanced lung adenocarcinoma, infiltration of CCL18+ TAMs was increased and higher expression of CCL18 by TAMs was associated with a favorable prognosis in lymph-node positive NSCLC.

  • CCL18
  • tumor-associated macrophages
  • TAMs
  • non-small-cell lung cancer
  • NSCLC
  • tumor microenvironment
  • immune response
  • prognostic factors

The significance of the immune system for tumor growth and progression is widely acknowledged and although non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has traditionally been believed to be non-immunogenic, recent advances in immune-specific approaches have shown encouraging results (1, 2). The tumor microenvironment consists of a variety of immune cells that interact directly and through cytokines and chemokines in a paracrine fashion and thus conduct the local immune response to malignant tumors (2). Common immune cells that are involved in these interactions include tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, dendritic cells and tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs). TAMs are found in most neoplastic tissues and can make up a large fraction of the tumor mass (3).

TAMs are thought to orchestrate the host's anti-tumoral immune response. Depending on the tumor type, stage of disease and cross-talk between immune and tumor cells, this response can result in pro-tumoral effects by suppressing anticancer immunity and tumor-promoting pro-inflammatory activity, as well as antineoplastic cytotoxicity (4).

Different functional states of TAMs have been described as the M1 and M2 phenotypes. In the tumor microenvironment, mostly TAMs with M2 phenotype are found, which carry out immunosuppressive functions and are involved in the subversion of adaptive immunity by malignant tumors. Each state of polarized macrophages is associated with a distinct pattern of expression of cytokines which are responsible for the observed response (5, 6).

CC-chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) has been shown to be highly expressed in histopathological tissue sections, as well as in serum and other body fluids, in different tumor types (7-11). In the tumor microenvironment, it is mostly expressed by the M2-macrophages and is involved in the generation of the immune response, contributing to the immune escape of tumor cells by induction of regulatory T-cells (12-14). In order to further assess the local function and prognostic value of TAMs and CCL18 in NSCLC, the expression of cluster of differentiation 68 (CD68) as a marker for TAMs and CCL18 were analyzed by immunochemistry in a well-characterized NSCLC cohort and correlated with clinical and survival data.

Materials and Methods

Patient cohort. A total of 243 non-selected patients with NSCLC who underwent surgery at the Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical Center – University of Freiburg were included in this study. The patients were treated between 1/1990 and 12/2007 with curative intent. All patients had tumor-free resection margins. Clinicopathological and survival data were collected. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University Medical Center Freiburg (EK 10/12).

Tissue preparation and tissue multi-arrays (TMAs). Gross specimens were formalin fixed (24 to 48 hours in 4% buffered formalin) and paraffin embedded at the Institute of Surgical Pathology, Medical Center – University of Freiburg, using routine procedures. All cases were microscopically reclassified by three experienced lung pathologists (AC, CK, GK) with respect to the current WHO classification (15). This included immunohistochemical analyses as previously described (16). Furthermore, Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) classification of all cases was adjusted to the TNM classification (7th edition) (17). TMAs with a core diameter of 2 mm were constructed. With respect to tumor heterogeneity of all NSCLCs, three cores, whenever possible from three different paraffin blocks for each patient, were used to build the TMA. For comparison with non-tumorous tissue, a TMA with non-neoplastic lung tissue (including alveolar and bronchial tissue) of 29 patients included in the cohort was built.

Immunohistochemistry and scoring. Three-micrometer-thick TMA sections were dewaxed and rehydrated in graded alcohol and subsequently subjected to antigen retrieval with citrate buffer (pH 6.1) for 30 minutes at 95°C. Incubation for retrieval of CCL18 (monoclonal mouse anti-human MAB394, 1:25; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was 30 minutes at room temperature. Visualization was performed using DAKO K5005 kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). Afterwards, second primary antibody directed against CD68 (monoclonal mouse anti-human 1PG-M1, 1:2000; DAKO) was applied for 30 minutes at room temperature. DAKO Real Flex kit served for visualization (Figure 1).

Prior to scoring, all slides were digitized using a Panoramic Scan (3D Histech, Budapest, Hungary). Of all TMA cores, the percentage area of vital tumor was assessed and within this, all single CD68+ as well as all CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages were counted. From these figures, the actual numbers of CD68+ and CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages per mm2 within vital tumor tissue were calculated. Mean values of all three available TMA cores for each patient were used for statistical analyses.

Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS software suite 21 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). As the distributions of CCL18 and CD68 values were not normal, non-parametric tests (Mann–Whitney U-test; Kruskal–Wallis test) were applied to investigate for differences between subgroups. Non-normally distributed data are shown as medians with interquartile range (IQR), normally distributed data as mean with standard deviation (SD). Survival analysis was carried out using Kaplan–Meier plots and log-rank tests as well as Cox regression models for multivariate analysis. Results were considered significant for p-values of less than 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics. A total of 243 patients were included in the study. The mean age at the time of surgery was 64 (±9.6) years. Sixty-nine patients were female and 174 were male. All patients suffered from histologically-proven NSCLC, of which 84 were classified as adenocarcinoma, 115 as squamous cell carcinoma, 18 as large cell carcinoma and 26 as large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. Clinical and histopathological characteristics are summarized in Table I.

Expression of CD68 and CCL18 in pathological sections of NSCLC. CD68+ and CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages per mm2 within vital tumor tissue were determined. Considering all sections, a median of 59 (range=20-95) CD68+ macrophages per mm2 and 2.6 (range=1-5) CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages per mm2 were detected. The median fraction of CCL18+/CD68+ out of the total CD68+ macrophages was 5.8% (range=2-14%). There were no significant differences in CD68+ or CD68+/CCL18+ macrophages when comparing the different tumor entities nor by T-and N-stage. Moreover, when comparing the respective expression patterns according to gender, no differences were observed (p=0.873 and p=0.826).

Infiltration of CD68+ cells is associated with poorer differentiation of lung adenocarcinoma. The frequency as well as proportion of CD68+ and CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages were tested for correlation with different histopathological and clinical parameters. In adenocarcinoma, a higher grading was significantly associated with a higher median density of CD68+ macrophages, especially in well-differentiated [8.7 (range=7-49)/mm2] as opposed to moderate and poorly differentiated carcinomas [65 (24-98)/mm2 and 68 (27-113)/mm2, p=0.04]. No respective differences were seen for CD68+/CCL18+ macrophages. Furthermore, the proportion of CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages did not correlate with tumor grading (p=0.57). No correlation between TAM infiltration, CCL18 expression and tumor differentiation was observed for any of the other tumor entities.

CD68+ and CCL18+/CD68+ cells are more frequent in clinically advanced lung adenocarcinoma. Comparison of the different clinical stages (UICC I-IV) showed significant differences regarding CD68+ (p=0.02), but not CD68+/CCL18+ cells per mm2 (p=0.15). Notably, when comparing early (UICC I/II) to advanced (UICC III/IV) lung adenocarcinoma, CD68+ (p=0.03) as well as CD68+/CCL18+ macrophages were significantly more frequent in advanced disease (p=0.04). However, the proportion of CCL18+ macrophages did not differ in early- versus late-stage lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.71). In none of the other examined tumor entities were corresponding differences observed. The data are summarized in Table II.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunohistochemistry showing CD68+ cells as brownish (A) and CCL18+ cells as reddish stain (B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

The fraction of CCL18 and CD68 double-positive cells in pathologicaI sections is an independent prognosticator in lymph node-positive NSCLC. CCL18 has been shown to be a prognosticator in various tumor types. We compared survival according to high and low expression of CD68+ and CD68+/CCL18+ macrophages, as well as the proportion of CCL18+ macrophages for the whole cohort.

In patients with tumor-positive lymph nodes, a high fraction of CCL18+ macrophages was linked to a better overall survival (p=0.03) (Figure 2A). In lymph node-negative patients, no such correlation was observed (p=0.62) (Figure 2B).

Figure 2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2

Survival analysis according to the proportion of CCL18+/CD68+ cells in (A) lymph node-positive and (B) lymph node-negative non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In lymph node-positive disease, a higher CCL18 expression was associated with a significantly better overall survival (p=0.03). Multivariate analysis confirmed CCL18 as an independent prognosticator in NSCLC with lymph node metastasis (hazard ratio=0.6, 95% confidence interval=0.35-0.86, p=0.009).

Multivariate analysis including the variables grading, gender and clinical tumor stage confirmed a high proportion of CCL18+ macrophages to be an independent prognosticator in late-stage NSCLC (hazard ratio=0.6, 95% confidence interval=0.35-0.86, p=0.009) (Table III). Interestingly, neither the total number of CD68+ cells nor CD68+/CCL18+ cells showed predictive value in the studied cohort.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Frequency of CD68+ and CCL18+ macrophages per mm2 according to clinical tumor stage in lung adenocarcinoma.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analyses of variables related to overall survival in patients with lymph node-positive disease.

Discussion

Cancer-related immune response is a fundamental element of tumor initiation and progression (2, 18, 19). TAMs are believed to be key players in the tumor microenvironment and to orchestrate the immune response (18). TAMs are predominantly polarized to an M2 state, in which they carry out mostly immunosuppressive functions and are responsible for tissue remodeling and repair (20). They are the main producers of CCL18, which is believed to be involved in the subversion of adaptive immunity and to participate in diverse immune responses in malignant tumors. CCL18 is also known to have chemotactic functions and to participate in the homing process of T-cells and dendritic cells and to differentiate dendritic cells able to prime regulatory T-cells and thus induce immune tolerogenity (12, 13, 21). Furthermore, CCL18 has been shown to promote tumor invasion, migration and epithelial to mesenchymal transition in NSCLC, which are essential hallmarks of metastatic tumor spread (22, 23).

We evaluated TAMs and their expression of CCL18 in a large and well-characterized cohort to further elucidate these processes in NSCLC. As expected, we found a higher density of CCL18+ macrophages in advanced lung adenocarcinoma represented by the clinical stages UICC III and IV. These findings are in line with different previous studies where CCL18 expression in tumor sections was associated with lymphangiogenesis, as well as with lymph node and distant metastasis (23-25). Additionally, analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage in NSCLC revealed an increase of CCL18 concentration to be associated with tumor size and presence of lymph node metastasis (9).

In the present study, survival analysis showed a higher proportion of CCL18+ TAMs to be an independent prognosticator in lymph node-positive NSCLC. Notably, the total number of CCL18+/CD68+ macrophages was not prognostic for our cohort. In addition, neither CCL18 nor CD68 expression in the tumor sections had any prognostic value in NSCLC without the presence of lymph node metastasis.

Multiple previous studies reported controversial results concerning the prognostic value of CCL18 in different tumor types. On the one hand, in gastric and colorectal cancer, higher CCL18 expression in tissue samples was linked to prolonged patient survival (26, 27). Additionally, in the latter, significance rose with increasing tumor stage, in line with our study. On the other hand, in a study by Pinto and colleagues, colorectal cancer matrices were shown to polarize macrophages towards the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype and thus to promote cancer cell invasion via CCL18 signaling (24). Interestingly, CCL18 expression in TAMs in those with an advanced tumor stage was higher at the tumor front, where it is thought to promote tumor invasion. In patients suffering from breast cancer, higher CCL18 levels in blood as well as in cancer stroma, were associated with an increased occurrence of metastasis, tumor invasion and reduced patient survival (28).

In a study on lung adenocarcinoma, high serum CCL18 concentrations were associated with a shorter survival time (7). However, it is unlikely that serum CCL18 concentrations are linked directly to CCL18 expression in tumor tissues, as measurement before and after resection of NSCLC showed similar serum CCL18 concentrations and local and systemic CCL18 concentrations in NSCLC need not necessarily be connected and results should not be compared (9).

Furthermore, we found more CD68+ macrophages in poorly differentiated tumors and in clinically advanced tumor stages. Prognostic significance of TAMs has been shown in several other tumor types, including carcinoma, sarcoma, melanoma and lymphoma (29-32). In NSCLC, multiple previous studies have shown contradictory results on the prognostic value of TAM infiltration in tumor sections, as positive, and negative, as well as no prognostic correlation has been reported (33-35). Dai and colleagues suggested that the prognostic value of TAMs in NSCLC depended on the micro-localization represented either by tumor islets or tumor stroma (36). Interestingly, in our study, despite the clear association of TAM infiltration in adenocarcinoma with negative prognosticators such as tumor grading and advanced clinical stage, the number of CD68+ macrophages in histopathological sections did not have any prognostic value. Our current study was not designed to differentiate the micro-localization of the respective cells, but in future studies addressing TAM infiltration as well as CCL18 expression, localization within the tumor should be addressed in order to identify any possible influence on its various functions.

Conclusion

Our study showed an increased infiltration of CCL18+ TAMs in advanced lung adenocarcinoma and identified the proportion of CCL18+ TAMs as being an independent prognosticator in lymph node-positive NSCLC. However, the underlying interactions are complex and not yet fully understood. Nevertheless, CCL18 seems to carry out important functions, especially in lung adenocarcinoma and lymph node-positive NSCLC, and our findings warrant further studies on the underlying mechanisms.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure

    There are no conflicts of interest regarding the material discussed in this article.

  • Received May 10, 2018.
  • Revision received June 5, 2018.
  • Accepted June 11, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Shepherd FA,
    2. Douillard J-Y,
    3. Blumenschein GR
    : Immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: novel approaches to improve patient outcome. J Thorac Oncol 6: 1763-1773, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Lorusso G,
    2. Rüegg C
    : The tumor microenvironment and its contribution to tumor evolution toward metastasis. Histochem Cell Biol 130: 1091-103, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pollard JW
    : Tumour-educated macrophages promote tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 71-78, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Allavena P,
    2. Sica A,
    3. Solinas G,
    4. Porta C,
    5. Mantovani A
    : The inflammatory micro-environment in tumor progression: The role of tumor-associated macrophages. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 66: 1-9, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Mantovani A,
    2. Sica A,
    3. Sozzani S,
    4. Allavena P,
    5. Vecchi A,
    6. Locati M
    : The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol 25: 677-686, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Mantovani A,
    2. Sozzani S,
    3. Locati M,
    4. Allavena P,
    5. Sica A
    : Macrophage polarization: Tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol 23: 549-555, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Plönes T,
    2. Krohn A,
    3. Burger M,
    4. Veelken H,
    5. Passlick B,
    6. Müller-Quernheim J,
    7. Zissel G
    : Serum level of CC-chemokine ligand 18 is increased in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer and correlates with survival time in adenocarcinomas. PLoS One 7: e41746, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Schutyser E
    : Involvement of CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) in normal and pathological processes. J Leukoc Biol 78: 14-26, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Schmid S,
    2. Le U-T,
    3. Haager B,
    4. Mayer O,
    5. Dietrich I,
    6. Elze M,
    7. Kemna LJ,
    8. Zissel G,
    9. Passlick B
    : Local concentrations of CC-chemokine-ligand 18 correlate with tumor size in non-small cell lung cancer and are elevated in lymph node-positive disease. Anticancer Res 36: 4667-4671, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yuan R,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. He X,
    4. Wu X,
    5. Ke J,
    6. Zou Y,
    7. Cai Z,
    8. Zeng Y,
    9. Wang L,
    10. Wang J,
    11. Fan X,
    12. Wu X,
    13. Lan P
    : CCL18 as an independent favorable prognostic biomarker in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Res 183: 163-169, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Meng F,
    2. Li W,
    3. Li C,
    4. Gao Z,
    5. Guo K,
    6. Song S
    : CCL18 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition, invasion and migration of pancreatic cancer cells in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Int J Oncol 46: 1109-1120, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Jonuleit H,
    2. Schmitt E,
    3. Schuler G,
    4. Knop J,
    5. Enk AH
    : Induction of interleukin 10-producing, nonproliferating CD4(+) T-cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells. J Exp Med 192: 1213-1222, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Roncarolo MG,
    2. Levings MK,
    3. Traversari C
    : Differentiation of T-regulatory cells by immature dendritic cells. J Exp Med 193: F5-9, 2001.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Azzaoui I,
    2. Yahia SA,
    3. Chang Y,
    4. Vorng H,
    5. Morales O,
    6. Fan Y,
    7. Delhem N,
    8. Ple C,
    9. Tonnel A-B,
    10. Wallaert B,
    11. Tsicopoulos A
    : CCL18 differentiates dendritic cells in tolerogenic cells able to prime regulatory T-cells in healthy subjects. Blood 118: 3549-3558, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Travis WD,
    2. Brambilla E,
    3. Müller-hermelink HK,
    4. Harris CC
    : World Health Organization Classification of Tumours: WHO Classification Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart Pathology & Genetics Tumours of the Lung, Pleura, Thymus and Heart, 2004.
  14. ↵
    1. Kayser G,
    2. Csanadi A,
    3. Otto C,
    4. Plönes T,
    5. Bittermann N,
    6. Rawluk J,
    7. Passlick B,
    8. Werner M
    : Simultaneous multi-antibody staining in non-small cell lung cancer strengthens diagnostic accuracy especially in small tissue samples. PLoS One 8: e56333, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz M. K.,
    3. Wittekind C
    : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. International Union Against Cancer. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  16. ↵
    1. Mantovani A,
    2. Marchesi F,
    3. Malesci A,
    4. Laghi L,
    5. Allavena P
    : Tumour-associated macrophages as treatment targets in oncology. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 14: 399-416, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Schmid S,
    2. Kübler M,
    3. Korcan Ayata C,
    4. Lazar Z,
    5. Haager B,
    6. Hoßfeld M,
    7. Meyer A,
    8. Cicko S,
    9. Elze M,
    10. Wiesemann S,
    11. Zissel G,
    12. Passlick B,
    13. Idzko M
    : Altered purinergic signaling in the tumor-associated immunologic microenvironment in metastasized non-small-cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 90: 516-521, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Sica A,
    2. Schioppa T,
    3. Mantovani A,
    4. Allavena P
    : Tumour-associated macrophages are a distinct M2 polarised population promoting tumour progression: Potential targets of anticancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 42: 717-727, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Chang Y,
    2. de Nadai P,
    3. Azzaoui I,
    4. Morales O,
    5. Delhem N,
    6. Vorng H,
    7. Tomavo S,
    8. Ait Yahia S,
    9. Zhang G,
    10. Wallaert B,
    11. Chenivesse C,
    12. Tsicopoulos A
    : The chemokine CCL18 generates adaptive regulatory T-cells from memory CD4+ T-cells of healthy but not allergic subjects. FASEB J 24: 5063-5072, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ploenes T,
    2. Scholtes B,
    3. Krohn A,
    4. Burger M,
    5. Passlick B,
    6. Müller-Quernheim J,
    7. Zissel G
    : CC-chemokine ligand 18 induces epithelial to mesenchymal transition in lung cancer A549 cells and elevates the invasive potential. PLoS One 8: e53068, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Shi L,
    2. Zhang B,
    3. Sun X,
    4. Zhang X,
    5. Lv S,
    6. Li H,
    7. Wang X,
    8. Zhao C,
    9. Zhang H,
    10. Xie X,
    11. Wang Y,
    12. Zhang P
    : CC chemokine ligand 18 (CCL18) promotes migration and invasion of lung cancer cells by binding to NIR1 through NIR1-ELMO1/DOC180 signaling pathway. Mol Carcinog 55: 2051-2062, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Pinto ML,
    2. Rios E,
    3. Silva AC,
    4. Neves SC,
    5. Caires HR,
    6. Pinto AT,
    7. Durães C,
    8. Carvalho FA,
    9. Cardoso AP,
    10. Santos NC,
    11. Barrias CC,
    12. Nascimento DS,
    13. Pinto-do-Ó P,
    14. Barbosa MA,
    15. Carneiro F,
    16. Oliveira MJ
    : Decellularized human colorectal cancer matrices polarize macrophages towards an anti-inflammatory phenotype promoting cancer cell invasion via CCL18. Biomaterials 124: 211-224, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Zhang BC,
    2. Gao J,
    3. Wang J,
    4. Rao ZG,
    5. Wang BC,
    6. Gao JF
    : Tumor-associated macrophages infiltration is associated with peritumoral lymphangiogenesis and poor prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma. Med Oncol 28: 1447-1452, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Yuan R,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. He X,
    4. Wu X,
    5. Ke J,
    6. Zou Y,
    7. Cai Z,
    8. Zeng Y,
    9. Wang L,
    10. Wang J,
    11. Fan X,
    12. Wu X,
    13. Lan P
    : CCL18 as an independent favorable prognostic biomarker in patients with colorectal cancer. J Surg Res 183: 163-169, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Leung SYI,
    2. Yuen SIUT,
    3. Chu KMAN,
    4. Mathy JA,
    5. Li RUI,
    6. Chan ASY,
    7. Law S,
    8. Wong J,
    9. Chen XIN,
    10. So S
    : Expression profiling identifies chemokine (C-C Motif) ligand 18 as an independent prognostic indicator in gastric cancer. Gastroenterology 5085: 457-469, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Yao Y,
    3. Gong C,
    4. Yu F,
    5. Su S,
    6. Chen J,
    7. Liu B,
    8. Deng H,
    9. Wang F,
    10. Lin L,
    11. Yao H,
    12. Su F,
    13. Anderson KS,
    14. Liu Q,
    15. Ewen ME,
    16. Yao X,
    17. Song E
    : CCL18 from tumor-associated macrophages promotes breast cancer metastasis via PITPNM3. Cancer Cell 19: 541-555, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lee C-H,
    2. Espinosa I,
    3. Vrijaldenhoven S,
    4. Subramanian S,
    5. Montgomery KD,
    6. Zhu S,
    7. Marinelli RJ,
    8. Peterse JL,
    9. Poulin N,
    10. Nielsen TO,
    11. West RB,
    12. Gilks CB,
    13. van de Rijn M
    : Prognostic significance of macrophage infiltration in leiomyosarcomas. Clin Cancer Res 14: 1423-1430, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Mäkitie T,
    2. Summanen P,
    3. Tarkkanen A,
    4. Kivelä T
    : Tumor-infiltrating macrophages (CD68(+) cells) and prognosis in malignant uveal melanoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42: 1414-1421, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hamada I,
    2. Kato M,
    3. Yamasaki T,
    4. Iwabuchi K,
    5. Watanabe T,
    6. Yamada T,
    7. Itoyama S,
    8. Ito H,
    9. Okada K
    : Clinical effects of tumor-associated macrophages and dendritic cells on renal cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 22: 4281-4284, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Farinha P,
    2. Masoudi H,
    3. Skinnider BF,
    4. Shumansky K,
    5. Spinelli JJ,
    6. Gill K,
    7. Klasa R,
    8. Voss N,
    9. Connors JM,
    10. Gascoyne RD
    : Analysis of multiple biomarkers shows that lymphoma-associated macrophage (LAM) content is an independent predictor of survival in follicular lymphoma (FL). Blood 106: 2169-2174, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Welsh TJ,
    2. Green RH,
    3. Richardson D,
    4. Waller DA,
    5. O'Byrne KJ,
    6. Bradding P
    : Macrophage and mast-cell invasion of tumor cell islets confers a marked survival advantage in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 23: 8959-8967, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Toomey D,
    2. Smyth G,
    3. Condron C,
    4. Kelly J,
    5. Byrne A-M,
    6. Kay E,
    7. Conroy RM,
    8. Broe P,
    9. Bouchier-Hayes D
    : Infiltrating immune cells, but not tumour cells, express FasL in non-small cell lung cancer: No association with prognosis identified in 3-year follow-up. Int J Cancer 103: 408-412, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Chen JJW,
    2. Yao P-L,
    3. Yuan A,
    4. Hong T-M,
    5. Shun C-T,
    6. Kuo M-L,
    7. Lee Y-C,
    8. Yang P-C
    : Up-regulation of tumor interleukin-8 expression by infiltrating macrophages: its correlation with tumor angiogenesis and patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 9: 729-737, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Dai F,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Che G,
    4. Yu N,
    5. Pu Q,
    6. Zhang S,
    7. Ma J,
    8. Ma L,
    9. You Z
    : The number and microlocalization of tumor-associated immune cells are associated with patient's survival time in non-small cell lung cancer. BMC Cancer 10: 220, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 7
July 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CC-Chemokine Ligand 18 Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Lymph Node-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
CC-Chemokine Ligand 18 Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Lymph Node-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
SEVERIN SCHMID, AGNES CSANADI, NIKOLA KOZHUHAROV, MARCEAU TCHUDJIN, CLAUDIA KAYSER, JUSTYNA RAWLUK, BERNWARD PASSLICK, MARTIN WERNER, ANTJE PRASSE, GIAN KAYSER
Anticancer Research Jul 2018, 38 (7) 3913-3918; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12676

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
CC-Chemokine Ligand 18 Is an Independent Prognostic Marker in Lymph Node-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
SEVERIN SCHMID, AGNES CSANADI, NIKOLA KOZHUHAROV, MARCEAU TCHUDJIN, CLAUDIA KAYSER, JUSTYNA RAWLUK, BERNWARD PASSLICK, MARTIN WERNER, ANTJE PRASSE, GIAN KAYSER
Anticancer Research Jul 2018, 38 (7) 3913-3918; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12676
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bis-type Triaziquone Induces PARP1-mediated Cell Death in Human NPC/HK1 Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells
  • Leucine-rich Repeat-containing 15 as a Potential Marker and Therapeutic Target in Cervical Cancer
  • Potential Role of Tumor-derived MIF in B-Cell Antigen Presentation in Lung Adenocarcinoma: Single-cell and TCGA Analyses
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • CCL18
  • tumor-associated macrophages
  • TAMs
  • Non-small-cell lung cancer
  • NSCLC
  • tumor microenvironment
  • immune response
  • prognostic factors
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire