Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Lung Cancer Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cell-targeting Natural Compounds

ARNATCHAI MAIUTHED, WIPA CHANTARAWONG and PITHI CHANVORACHOTE
Anticancer Research July 2018, 38 (7) 3797-3809; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.12663
ARNATCHAI MAIUTHED
1Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Cell-based Drug and Health Products Development Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WIPA CHANTARAWONG
2Cell-based Drug and Health Products Development Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pithi_chan{at}yahoo.com pithi.c{at}chula.ac.th chantarawong.wp{at}gmail.com
PITHI CHANVORACHOTE
1Department of Pharmacology and Physiology, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
2Cell-based Drug and Health Products Development Research Unit, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: pithi_chan{at}yahoo.com pithi.c{at}chula.ac.th chantarawong.wp{at}gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The novel information regarding molecular and translational research have created a paradigm shift in the understanding of lung cancer biology, revealing the more precise target for anti-cancer drug discovery. Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer death worldwide accounting for approximately 1 in 5 of all cancer-related deaths. The most important causes of death in such a cancer involves the treatment failure as well as the spreading of cancer cells to distant sites which the cancer stem cell (CSC) within the tumor is accepted as a key driver. CSC is a rare special population of cancer cells exhibiting high tumorigenic properties together with self-renewal and differentiation capability. CSC is not only linked with high tumor-initiating activity, but is also implicated in chemotherapeutic resistance, metastasis, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and recurrence. Thereafter, novel therapeutic strategies targeting these CSCs are considered in order to improve long-term clinical outcome. Here, we provide sufficient data regarding the biology of CSC in lung cancer, known CSC markers and cellular signals, and promising compounds targeting the stem cell signals in lung cancer that may benefit the development of novel anti-cancer treatment.

  • Cancer stem cell
  • lung cancer
  • targeting
  • natural product
  • review

Lung cancer has been long recognized as a life-threatening cancer for several years. The death rate of such a cancer is very high in comparison to that of other cancers comprising approximately 20% of the world's cancer related deaths (1). A total of approximately 1.8 million new cases of lung cancer were estimated in 2012 and this number accounted for 13% of all new cancer cases (1). Generally, more than three-fourths (nearly 80%) of all lung cancers are non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and the rest are small cell lung cancers (SCLC) (2). NSCLC can be further classified to adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell carcinoma (2). Worldwide, a very high number of NSCLC new cases are diagnosed annually and the five-year survival is only about 17.8%. Therefore, the NSCLC is considered very lethal with both high incidence and low survival. NSCLC is frequently found in the elderly population and smoking is accounted as the most important risk factor in most patients (3). Other contributory factors are exposure to environmental toxicants including asbestos, radon, and certain metals such as arsenic, cadmium, and chromium (4). In addition, the exposure to organic chemicals found in coal smoke and fuel burning have been reported to be the risk factors of lung cancer (5).

The concept of cancer stem cells (CSC) was introduced in 1977 (6) and has now become a very interested topic in cancer research. CSCs are a small rare fraction (in most solid tumor <1%) of the whole cancer cell population that exhibit high tumorigenic potential (7). CSCs were first recognized as cancer initiating cells as they are believed to be the root cause or seed of cancer (8, 9). The characteristics of CSCs which play pivotal role in driving aggressiveness of cancer include their self-renewal capacity, differentiation (asymmetric cell division), high invasion and migration characteristics, high tumorigenicity, and resistance to chemotherapy (10). Based on such information, CSCs are thought to be the main mediators of all cancer hallmarks including high tumorigenic, high metastasis potential, evading from immune system, resistance to chemotherapy, and cancer relapse (8, 9).

The knowledge at the present day has pointed that the currently used therapeutic approaches comprising surgery, radio-, chemo-, and targeted therapy, in particular for lung cancer management have failed to eradicate the CSC population, a main cause of disease relapse. Natural product-derived compounds that specifically target these CSCs could unravel a more precise and efficient way to eradicate this disease.

In addition, the better understanding of CSC biology in relevant to the basic mechanisms enhancing CSC properties and aggressive behaviors of lung and other high mortality cancers may influence the development of cancer management strategies including anti-metastatic, control of CSC activities, and inhibition of cancer relapse.

Cancer Stem Cell in Lung Cancer

It is now well accepted that lung cancer is characterized by a heterogeneity of cancer cells which exhibit different cell phenotypes as resulted from their distinct cellular signaling.

Among the different lineage of cancer cells residing in the tumor, there is a specific small population of cancer cells that has stem cell characteristics including the self-renewal capacity and multi-lineage differentiation (11, 12). Nevertheless, the cancer cells containing the stem cell capacities exhibit highly aggressive phenotypes such as tumorigenic potency, migration and invasion, evading from anoikis, and chemotherapeutic resistance (9, 12-14). These specific subpopulation of cancer cells were first named “cancer initiating cells”, as they were believed to be the beginning seed of the whole cancer and have now become the main focus of cancer cell biology as well as anti-cancer drug discovery researches.

CSCs were first identified in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by their cell surface marker CD34+Cd38−. These cells were shown to have a high capacity to self-renew in bone marrow and differentiate to leukemic cells when transplanted into severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice (15). After these observations were made, CSCs of various cancer types including lung cancer were discovered through specific cell-surface proteins by numerous research groups (16). However, recent studies suggested that not only CSCs but also certain populations of cancer cells within tumors can have stem cell properties (stemness) (17). Moreover, fully differentiated cancer cells can be transformed to be cancer stem-like cells (CSC-like cells) by the activity of certain cancer microenvironment substances such as nitric oxide, hypoxia condition, and interleukin (18-20) or by the mutation of specific gene including TP53 (21, 22). These indicated that “stemness” is a phenotype which can be acquired via proper extracellular stimulation signals or accumulation of specific gene mutations within the cells. Nevertheless, both CSC and CSC-like cells show the same characteristics as normal stem cells.

The key CSC properties compose of:

  • Self-renewal capacity; an unique ability of the CSC (just like normal stem cells) to generate the identical daughter cells with identical stem cell characteristics.

  • Ability to drive tumor heterogeneity and survival of tumor; an ability to differentiate into different cancer cell linages, facilitate cell growth, and survival of whole tumor.

  • High tumorigenic potential; an ability of CSC to proliferate and create non-CSC lineages and form new tumors.

Based on the discovery of CSC in lung cancer together with the knowledge from clinical pathology, lung cancer is well recognized as a disease of heterogeneity. Researches have shown that the cancer cells derived form same tumor have a distinct ability to form tumor spheroid in vitro as well as in vivo (23, 24). Cancer cells within the same tumor have diverse cellular properties and signaling resulting from the accumulation of genetic mutations and epigenetics alterations. These differences in cellular properties and signaling are associated with plasticity and heterogeneity of cancer stem cells which could be identified by certain biomarkers.

Cancer Stem Cell Markers and Regulatory Proteins

As CSCs maintain high stem cell signaling that is similar to that in normal tissues, certain cellular markers used for the identification of normal stem cells are also utilized for CSC identification. For lung cancer, the well-recognized CSC markers are summarized in Table I and described as followed.

Cluster of differentiation-133 (CD133, prominin-1, PROM-1). CD133 is an 865 amino acids penta-span transmembrane protein which has been accepted as a principle marker of stemness in several solid tumors (25). In human, this protein is a 120 kDa protein product of a single-copy gene on chromosome 4 (4p15.32) (25). In general, CD133 is an important marker used for the isolation and identification of the stem cells from normal tissue like human hematopoietic stem cells (26, 27). The function of CD133 in the cells is not fully known yet but several studies have shown that CD133 expression is linked with stem and progenitor cell characteristics as well as the stage of cell regeneration and differentiation (27). Emerging evidence has also shown that CD133 is involved in cell growth and development (28).

In cancers, evidence has shown that the expression of CD133 is associated with tumor aggressiveness through up-regulation of certain proteins (29-32).

Later on, evidence has shown that CD133 is not only a biomarker and is functioning in normal stem cells, but also in cancer cells. Expression of CD133 has been used for the identification of CSC in several cancers including lung (33), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (34), hepatocellular carcinoma (35), prostate (36), neural (37), colorectal (38), and renal cancers (39). In particular, CD133 is frequently used for indicating stemness in lung cancer following immune-histochemical analysis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (29) or small cell lung cancer (SCLC) (40) patient samples. Subsequent transplantation of CD133+cells cultured from these tumors into severe combined immune-deficient (SCID) mice generated tumor xenografts phenotypically identical to the original tumor.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Cancer stem cell marker for lung cancer.

Cluster of differentiation-44 (CD44). CD44 is 742 amino acids cell surface glycoprotein member of the tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily. In human, this protein is approximately 80-95 kDa and is the product of the gene in the short arm of chromosome 11 (11p13). This protein is implicated in the activities of several types of cells including hematopoietic, epithelial, endothelial, and tumor cells (41). The function of CD44 is involved in multiple cellular processes such as cell growth and differentiation, cellular movement, angiogenesis and release of protease enzyme from cell membrane (41). The activation of CD44 by heterodimerization with growth factor receptors (EGFR, FGFR, HGFR, VEGFR, TGF-βR) leads to the activation of PI3K-AKT and MAPK pathways (42). CD44 has been recognized as a marker for lung cancer stem cells (43) by analyzing the CSC marker expression in 10 NSCLC related to CSCs properties (43). Moreover, CD44 positive cell has high tumorigenicity in transplantation, increased capacity to resist to chemotherapy, and higher expression of stem cell transcription factor Oct-4 and Nanog. However, analysis of lung tumor samples by immunohistochemical revealed that CD44 expression was a prognostic marker only in adenocarcinomas but not in squamous cell carcinomas.

Aldehyde dehydrogenases 1A1 (ALDH1A1). Aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) is a member of a group of enzymes that catalyze the oxidation of aldehydes to carboxylic acids. ALDH1A1 is 501 amino acid protein member of the ALDH1 family and is also known as retino aldyhyde dehydrogenase1 (RALDH1). In human, this protein is an approximately 55 kDa protein, product of the ALDH1A1 gene located in chromosome 9 (9q21.13). ALDH1A1 is a putative hematopoietic stem cell marker associated with increased drug resistance in many cancers (44). ALDH1A1 has been used to develop the assay named “Aldefluor assay” which is used to distinguish stem and progenitor cells from normal cells. This assay also has been used in the identification of potential CSCs in leukemia, breast, neural, head and neck, colon, liver and lung cancers (45). More recently, lung CSCs have been identified using this method (46). NSCLC cells with relatively high ALDH1 activity, displayed in vitro features of CSCs, including an increased capacity for proliferation, self-renewal, differentiation and expression of the CSC surface marker, CD133 (47, 48). Xenograft transplantation of these cells in NOD/SCID mice demonstrated increased tumorigenicity, in addition to increased ALDH1 protein expression which correlated with poor clinical outcome and advanced stage of disease in NSCLC.

ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2). ABCG2 (BRCP, ABCP, MXR) is the member of ATP binding cassette (ABC) superfamily that consists of transmembrane proteins. ABCG2 is 655 amino acids with approximately 72kDa protein product of a gene in chromosome 4 (4q22). ABCG2 is a half-transporter predominantly localized at plasma membranes, while dimerization is required for active function (49). The side population phenotype (SP) is one well-known characterization method of CSC. This method measures the ability of stem cells to efflux the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33342 from the cells. ABCG2 has been proved to be a molecular determinant responsible for SP phenotype (50). ABCG2 expression is a conserved feature of stem cells from a wide variety of tissues, including pancreas, lung, limbal epithelium, heart, testis, muscle, cornea and conjunctiva, brain, prostate, and embryo (51). Moreover, ABCG2 was high frequently identified in various types of cancer including carcinomas of the digestive tract, lung, breast, ovarian, and melanoma (49). The expression level of ABCG2 is also associated with high pathological grade of tumor and poor prognosis outcome of patients (52, 53).

Transcription factors regulating cancer stem cells. CSCs characteristics are thought to be regulated by the numerous set of molecular signals that are tightly controlled by stem cell transcription factors which enrolled the activity to maintain normal stem cell functions. There are several well-characterized stem cell transcription factors that are used for CSC identification, and among them Octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct-4), Sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2), and Nanog are intensively used for lung CSC identification.

Octamer-binding transcription factor4 (Oct-4). Oct-4 is a POU domain-containing transcription factor that binds to the octamer sequence, ATGCAAAT, of the target genes. Oct-4 is encoded by POU5F1 gene located at chromosome 6p21.31. The human Oct-4 gene consists of five exons which can be spliced into three main isoforms OCT4A, OCT4B and OCT4B1. These gene isoforms provide four isoform proteins Oct4A, Oct4B-190, Oct4B-265, and Oct4B-164. All forms of Oct-4 are functionally and structurally divided into three domains including an N-terminal transcriptional activation domain, a central POU domain, and a C-terminus containing a cell type-specific transactivation domain. Oct4A, is generally referred as Oct-4, and regulates the stemness of embryonic stem cells. Oct-4 is highly expressed in embryonic stem (ES) cells and low expressed when ES cell differentiates and there is consequently loss of pluripotency. Oct-4 and its activities were shown to be required for maintaining the ES cell capacity (54). Several target genes of Oct-4 in ES cells have been identified, including Fgf4, Utf1, Opn, Rex1/Zfp42, and Fbx15 (55). Additionally, high levels of Oct-4 have been identified in highly aggressive tumors, poor prognosis patients, and relapse cancer. It has been documented that overexpression of Oct-4 is associated with tumorigenicity, metastasis, and cancer relapse in certain cancers (56). High expression of Oct-4 was detected in prostate and breast cancer stem cells and in the tumor initiating cells in a p53−/− tumor mice model (57). Oct-4 level and activity are known to be regulated by several steps, such as transcription, translation, and post-translational modifications. The key regulatory control of Oct-4 is found to be the post-translational modifications via phosphorylation. Oct-4 can be phosphorylated by various types of protein kinases at Ser229, Ser236 and tyr327. Phosphorylation at these residues regulates Oct-4 stability and transcriptional activity (58, 59). Ubiquitination is the main pathway responsible for eliminating short-lived proteins. Oct-4 can be ubiquitinated by an HECT-type E3 ubiquitin ligase, Wwp2. Wwp2 regulates Oct-4 level by mediating its ubiquitination and degradation during ESC differentiation. Both the Wwp2 and Oct4 levels decrease when ESCs are induced to differentiate (60). The small ubiquitin-related modifier (SUMO), which is functionally divergent from ubiquitin, can modify many nuclear proteins to affect their subcellular localization, thus altering their interaction with cooperative molecules. Studies show that Oct-4 can be sumoylated at a single lysine, lysine 118, which is located at the end of the N-terminal transactivation domain and next to the POU DNA-binding domain. Sumoylation of Oct-4 significantly increases its stability, DNA binding, and thus the transcriptional activity (59).

Sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2). SRY (sex determining region Y)-box2, Sox2, is a member of the Sox transcription factor of HMG-family that occupies many gene targets including self-renewal maintaining genes (61). Sox2 shares an approximately 80 amino acids region with its family known as high-mobility group (HMG) box domains which are DNA binding domains (62). Sox2 and Oct-4 cooperative to activate gene transcription by binding at non-palindromic sequences. In normal tissue, Sox2 regulates the morphogenesis of various tissue types including control branching morphogenesis of the bronchial tree and maturation of the epithelium of airways, development of gastric and intestinal basal cells, and growth and differentiation of neuronal cells. The amplification of DNA at 3q26.3 region which encodes the Sox2 gene is frequently observed in NCLCs squamous cell carcinoma. Sox2 expression is also observed in high grade prostate cancer, colorectal cancer and breast cancer (63). Additionally, overexpression of Sox2 is associated with chemo-resistance, cancer migration and anchorage-independent growth (63). The regulation of Sox2 level and transcriptional activity are found to be mainly by post-translational modifications. Sox2 can decrease its DNA binding capacity by sumoylation at lysine 247 which is triggered by phosphorylation at triplet serine (ser249, 250, and 251). Therefore, phosphorylation at Thr118 promotes Sox2 stability by blocking its ubiquitination. In addition, Sox2 is directly methylated at Arg113 by protein arginine methyltransferase 4 (PRMT4, known as CARM1). This methylation promotes Sox2 self-association via HMG-box domain. The acetylation by p300/cAMP-response element-binding protein (CBP) at Lys75 of Sox2 promotes its proteasomal degradation (59).

Nanog. Nanog is a 350 amino acid protein with a homeobox-containing motif which facilitates binding with DNA. Nanog is encoded by the NANOG1 gene, located on chromosome 12 (12p13.31), which is activated to maintain the pluripotent state of the cell. Based on the differences in gene expression between wild-type and Nanog null cells, it has been proposed that Nanog regulates pluripotency mainly as a transcription repressor for downstream genes that are important for cell differentiation such as Gata4 and Gata6 (64). However, Nanog can also activate the genes necessary for self-renewal such as Rex1. Nanog is highly expressed in pluripotent cells and its expression is down-regulated during differentiation. High expression of Nanog has been documented in many types of carcinomas such as tumor of brain, colon, breast, gastric, liver, kidney, and lung. Importantly, the expression of Nanog in certain tumors have provided positive correlation with treatment failure and poor prognosis of patients. Moreover, up-regulation of Nanog expression promotes tumorigenicity. These demonstrated that Nanog is associated with tumor progression, resistance to chemo/radiotherapy, and disease relapse (65). Nanog can be phosphorylated at four Ser/Thr-Pro motifs. These phosphorylation sites suppress the ubiquitination of Nanog and enhance its stability by promoting the interaction between Nanog and the prolyl isomerase Pin1 (66).

CSC and Lung Cancer Metastasis

Metastasis is a process comprising several steps where cancer cells disseminate form their original tumor to generate new tumors at distant parts (67). Like in other types of malignant human cancers, metastasis in lung cancer is considered as a key determining factor of prognosis of patients (68). Lung cancers are frequently diagnosed in metastatic stages (stage IV or more advance stages) at the time of first diagnosis (69). To successfully metastasize, the cancer cells encompass many biological processes including increased motility, induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), intravasation, survival in the blood or lymphatic circulations, extravasation, mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET), and ability to form new tumor (tumorigenesis) (70). A rare population (less than 1%) of cancer cells could succeed in metastasizing. Several natural compounds have been tested for their possible role in preventing cancer cell dissemination as explained in our previous work (71).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic figure of cancer stem cell in implication to metastasis, chemotherapeutic resistance, epithelial to mesenchymal transition, and cancer relapse.

The process of cancer cell transition from epithelium-like cells to mesenchymal-like cells has been shown to be implicated in several behaviors of normal as well as cancerous cells (72). Epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) is an essential process of the cancer cell to metastasize as it provides many important capabilities including ability to survive in detached conditions (anoikis resistance), increased invasion, and enhanced cell motility (73). It has been identified that the EMT in cancer cells involves several pleiotropic transcriptional factors, such as Snail (74), Slug (75), Zeb1 (76), Bmi-1 (77), and deltaEF1 (78). Such transcription factors enable EMT cells to disrupt epithelial adhesion, and cell to cell interaction (79). The EMT cells will then detach, leave the primary tumor mass, migrate, and invade into the circulation (80). It is known that EMT in cancer cells is relatively transient. Importantly, at the final step of cell dissemination when the cancer cells have reached the site of new establishment, the conversion of EMT named mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) is required to ensure stable cell interaction and adhesion to the surrounding new microenvironment (81). Therefore, the dynamic drive of EMT-MET processes is considered as a critical capability of cancer cells to metastasize (82).

After cancer cells have reached the site of metastasis, the tumorigenic potential, the unique property found in CSCs, of the cells is required for the establishment of new tumor (83, 84). These contexts have suggested the involvement of EMT and CSC in the process of metastasis. Even though the clear picture of how EMT relates to CSC is not yet verified, recent evidence has linked EMT to CSCs (85). EMT related transcription factors or inducers such as Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF), Transforming Growth Factor β (TGF-β), Hepatocyte Growth Factor (HGF), Wnt/β-catenin, Hedgehog, Notch pathways, are essential for CSCs (86, 87). Certain studies have pointed out that induction of EMT mediated by EMT inducers in fully differentiated epithelial cells can trigger CSC-like phenotypes including increased CD44, decreased CD24, and increased stem cell phenotypic markers (85, 88, 89). Furthermore, the decrease in E-cadherin and increase in MMP-2, an indicator of EMT, were found to be critical for CSCs to metastasize (90).

In conclusion, evidence has pointed out that the key players of metastasis are the cell possessing ability of CSC to generate new tumor, increased motility, and EMT-MET transition. It has been assumed that metastasis-initiating cells are overlapping with CSCs to some degree. In addition, genetic evaluation of CSCs revealed their relevance in tumor recurrence and metastases, supporting the conclusion that CSCs may be metastatic precursors. The involvement of CSC in lung cancer metastasis, EMT-MET, and cancer relapse is presented in Figure 1.

Natural Product Targeting Lung Cancer Stem Cells

Natural products have been a rich source of novel lead compounds which may be useful for anti-cancer approaches. Here we summarized the discovered natural product-derived compounds (Table II) that have been demonstrated to influence key CSC signaling pathways such as WNT/β-catenin, Hedgehog, Notch and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways (91-93).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Natural products targeting lung cancer stem cells and related mechanism.

Curcumin, a yellow polyphenol, is a key compound derived from the rhizome of Turmeric (Curcuma longa) belonging to the ginger family (Zingiberaceae) (94). Previous studies have revealed the promising activities of curcumin against various kinds of cancer. Curcumin is able to suppress cancer signaling pathways, inhibit metastasis and angiogenesis, induce apoptosis, and sensitize tumor cells to cancer therapies (95-98). Several studies have suggested that curcumin can target CSCs in a variety of human cancer types (99-102) including lung cancer (103). Curcumin can diminish the self-renewal capacity of lung CSCs by inducing DNA damage or suppressing DNA repair mechanisms. Sheefa et al., studied the effect of curcumin on circulating CSCs isolated by sphere formation assay and observed a significant inhibition of sphere formation (104). Moreover, the result from single cell gel electrophoresis assay showed that 95.47±0.72% of DNA material was present in comet tail (104). Wu et al., reported that curcumin disturbed JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway resulting in the reduction of tumor sphere growth of H460 lung cancer cells in vitro and in vivo (105). Curcumin has also been reported to reduce CSC marker (CD133, CD44, ALDHA1, Nanog and Oct4) expression, inhibit proliferation and induce apoptosis via down-regulation of WNT/β-catenin and Sonic Hedgehog pathways in A549 and H1299 cells (106). Furthermore, curcumin is an attractive candidate for combination therapy because curcumin can target CSCs which are responsible for cancer recurrence and therapy resistance. Baharuddin et al., combined curcumin with low dose cisplatin (3 μM) and found that curcumin increased the sensitivity of the highly migratory CD166+/EpCAM+ CSC subpopulation in the A549 and H2170 cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis and inhibited migration (107).

Many studies have revealed that natural products isolated from Dendrobium species possess anticancer properties including anti-proliferation, anti-migration, anti-metastasis, and apoptotic induction in lung cancer (108-110). Gigantol, a bibenzyl phenolic compound derived from several medicinal orchids, has been shown to inhibit proliferation, migration, EMT and CSC phenotype in lung cancer cells (111-114). At non-toxic doses (below 20 μM), gigantol isolated from Dendrobium draconis could suppress tumor spheroid formation and decrease lung CSC marker proteins, including CD133 and ALDH1A1, in non-small-cell lung cancer NCI-H460 cells (112). Additionally, gigantol inhibited cancer stem cell-like phenotypes through down-regulation of AKT signaling pathway which lead to reduced levels of Oct4 and Nanog (114). Chrysotoxine, a bibenzyl compound isolated from stems of Dendrobium pulchellum, has been reported to sensitize anoikis and inhibit metastasis of lung cancer cells in an anchorage-independent fashion (115). Bhummaphan et al. investigated the suppressive effects of chrysotoxine on CSC-rich populations of H460 and H23 cells and primary CSCs in three-dimensional (3D) culture and showed that non-toxic doses (≤20 μM) of chrysotoxine inhibited CSC-like phenotypes and decreased CSC markers CD133, CD44, ABCG2 and ALDH1A1 which were mediated through a Src-AKT-Sox2-dependent mechanism (116).

Vanillin, a 4-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde isolated from the seed of Vanilla planifolia, is widely used as a flavoring agent in food and cosmetics (117). Vanillin inhibited cell migration, lamellipodia formation and angiogenesis and induced apoptosis in many cancer types including lung cancer (117-120). Non-toxic doses (below 100 μM) of vanillin could inhibit spheroid and colony formation, major hallmarks of the cancer stemness, and reduce the CSC markers CD133 and ALDH1A1 and the related transcription factors, Oct4 and Nanog in H460 cells through the reduction of AKT and downstream CSC transcription factors (121).

Silibinin is a natural polyphenolic flavonoid derived from milk thistle seed (Silybum marianum) which has the ability to diminish many cancer types including lung cancer (122). To determine the suppressive effect of silibinin on lung cancer stem cells, Corominas-Faja et al. developed erlotinib-refractory cells (PC-9/Erl-R cells) by growing NSCLC PC-9 cells expressing the EGFR exon 19 deletion in routine culture medium containing a high dose of erlotinib (1 μM) (123). The results from flow cytometry and the ALDEFLUOR® reagent showed that silibinin reduced aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH)-expressing CSC-like cells in erlotinib-refractory cell populations and inhibited lung cancer spheres formation in a dose-dependent manner.

Isoflavone VF166, a derivative of soy isoflavone daidzein, can inhibit growth of various cancers including lung cancer. VF166 could suppress cell adhesion, migration and invasion of NSCLC in vitro. Moreover, the results from real time RT-PCR revealed that treatment with VF166 up- and down-regulated various genes including DKK1, KLF4, MUC1, ErbB2, PTCH1 and SMO in NSCLC cells involved in the regulation of invasion associated signaling pathways such as WNT/β-catenin, Hedgehog, STAT3, and SPARC (124).

Parthenolide, a natural sesquiterpene lactone isolated from the shoots of feverfew (Tanacetum parthenium), has anticancer effects on cancer cells and cancer stem cells from various types of cancer including lung cancer (125-128). Parthenolide has been shown to selectively kill cancer stem-like cells via ER stress and apoptosis signaling pathway in A549/shCDH1 cells in which CDH1/E-cadherin was knocked down with shRNA. Its underlying mechanisms are up-regulation of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4) and DNA damage-inducible transcript 3 (DDIT3) expression which lead to up-regulation of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PMAIP1) expression (129).

Renieramycin M (RM) isolated from the blue sponge Xestospongia sp. has been reported to have anti-invasion, anti-migration, and apoptosis-inducing activities in lung cancer cells (130). RM treatment at non-toxic concentrations reduced significantly colony and spheroid formation of H460 cells. Furthermore, RM can also down-regulate the CSC markers CD133, CD44 and ALDH1A1 of CSC-enriched H460 cells (131).

Salinomycin is polyether ionophore antibiotic derived from Streptomyces albus (132). Salinomycin showed time- and dose-dependent cytotoxic activity evaluated by sulforhodamine B and colony formation assay in LNM35 and A549 lung cancer cells (133). Treatment with salinomycin for 24 h has been shown to significantly inhibit the tumor sphere formation using flow cytometry and reduce stem cell markers OCT-4, NANOG and SOX2 expression by real-time RT-PCR analysis in ALDH A549 lung cells (134). Zhang et al. developed salinomycin-nanoparticles (salinomycin-NPs) and gefitinib-nanoparticles (gefitinib-NPs) by the emulsion/solvent evaporation approach to kill both lung CSCs and lung cancer A549 and A431 cells (135). Both salinomycin and salinomycin-NPs could selectively target CD133 positive CSCs and reduce tumor sphere formation in lung cells, while gefitinib and gefitinib-NPs preferably target lung cancer cells. Consistent with their in vitro results, salinomycin or salinomycin-NPs decreased CSC population in the tumors from nude mice bearing A431 xenografts. Furthermore, combination of Salinomycin-NPs and gefitinib-NPs has a more efficient suppressive effect on tumor growth than the combination of salinomycin and gefitinib or single salinomycin-NPs or gefitinib-NPs.

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by Ratchadapisek Somphot Fund for Postdoctoral Fellowship, Chulalongkorn University and grants from the Thailand Research Fund (RSA6180036).

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received May 17, 2018.
  • Revision received June 13, 2018.
  • Accepted June 14, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Soerjomataram I,
    3. Dikshit R,
    4. Eser S,
    5. Mathers C,
    6. Rebelo M,
    7. Parkin DM,
    8. Forman D,
    9. Bray F
    : Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136: E359-386, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Beasley MB,
    2. Brambilla E,
    3. Travis WD
    : The 2004 World Health Organization classification of lung tumors. Semin Roentgenol 40: 90-97, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dela Cruz CS,
    2. Tanoue LT,
    3. Matthay RA
    : Lung cancer: Epidemiology, etiology, and prevention. Clin Chest Med 32: 605-644, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Field RW,
    2. Withers BL
    : Occupational and environmental causes of lung cancer. Clin Chest Med 33: 681-703, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Loomis D,
    2. Grosse Y,
    3. Lauby-Secretan B,
    4. Ghissassi FE,
    5. Bouvard V,
    6. Benbrahim-Tallaa L,
    7. Guha N,
    8. Baan R,
    9. Mattock H,
    10. Straif K
    : The carcinogenicity of outdoor air pollution. Lancet Oncol 14: 1262-1263, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Bonnet D,
    2. Dick JE
    : Human acute myeloid leukemia is organized as a hierarchy that originates from a primitive hematopoietic cell. Nat Med 3: 730-737, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Pardal R,
    2. Clarke MF,
    3. Morrison SJ
    : Applying the principles of stem-cell biology to cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3: 895-902, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Koren E,
    2. Fuchs Y
    : The bad seed: Cancer stem cells in tumor development and resistance. Drug Resist Updat Rev Comment Antimicrob Anticancer Chemother 28: 1-12, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Adorno-Cruz V,
    2. Kibria G,
    3. Liu X,
    4. Doherty M,
    5. Junk DJ,
    6. Guan D,
    7. Hubert C,
    8. Venere M,
    9. Mulkearns-Hubert E,
    10. Sinyuk M,
    11. Alvarado A,
    12. Caplan AI,
    13. Rich J,
    14. Gerson SL,
    15. Lathia J,
    16. Liu H
    : Cancer stem cells: Targeting the roots of cancer, seeds of metastasis, and sources of therapy resistance. Cancer Res 75: 924-929, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Nassar D,
    2. Blanpain C
    : Cancer stem cells: Basic concepts and therapeutic implications. Annu Rev Pathol Mech Dis 11: 47-76, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  11. ↵
    1. Friedmann-Morvinski D,
    2. Verma IM
    : Dedifferentiation and reprogramming: origins of cancer stem cells. EMBO Rep 15: 244-253, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Lobo NA,
    2. Shimono Y,
    3. Qian D,
    4. Clarke MF
    : The biology of cancer stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 23: 675-699, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Chang JC
    : Cancer stem cells: Role in tumor growth, recurrence, metastasis, and treatment resistance. Medicine (Baltimore) 95: S20-25, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Donnenberg VS,
    2. Landreneau RJ,
    3. Donnenberg AD
    : Tumorigenic stem and progenitor cells: implications for the therapeutic index of anti-cancer agents. J Control Release Off J Control Release Soc 122: 385-391, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Lapidot T,
    2. Sirard C,
    3. Vormoor J,
    4. Murdoch B,
    5. Hoang T,
    6. Caceres-Cortes J,
    7. Minden M,
    8. Paterson B,
    9. Caligiuri MA,
    10. Dick JE
    : A cell initiating human acute myeloid leukaemia after transplantation into SCID mice. Nature 367: 645-648, 1994.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Tirino V,
    2. Desiderio V,
    3. Paino F,
    4. De Rosa A,
    5. Papaccio F,
    6. La Noce M,
    7. Laino L,
    8. De Francesco F,
    9. Papaccio G
    : Cancer stem cells in solid tumors: An overview and new approaches for their isolation and characterization. FASEB J Off Publ Fed Am Soc Exp Biol 27: 13-24, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Wang P,
    2. Wan W,
    3. Xiong S-L,
    4. Feng H,
    5. Wu N
    : Cancer stem-like cells can be induced through dedifferentiation under hypoxic conditions in glioma, hepatoma and lung cancer. Cell Death Discov 3: 16105, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Yongsanguanchai N,
    2. Pongrakhananon V,
    3. Mutirangura A,
    4. Rojanasakul Y,
    5. Chanvorachote P
    : Nitric oxide induces cancer stem cell-like phenotypes in human lung cancer cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 308: C89-100, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Carnero A,
    2. Lleonart M
    : The hypoxic microenvironment: A determinant of cancer stem cell evolution. Cell 1: 96-105, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Krishnamurthy S,
    2. Warner KA,
    3. Dong Z,
    4. Imai A,
    5. Nör C,
    6. Ward BB,
    7. Helman JI,
    8. Taichman RS,
    9. Bellile EL,
    10. McCauley LK,
    11. Polverini PJ,
    12. Prince ME,
    13. Wicha MS,
    14. Nör JE
    : Endothelial interleukin-6 defines the tumorigenic potential of primary human cancer stem cells. Stem Cells Dayt Ohio 32: 2845-2857, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Gadepalli VS,
    2. Deb SP,
    3. Deb S,
    4. Rao RR
    : Lung cancer stem cells, p53 mutations and MDM2. Subcell Biochem 85: 359-370, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ashkenazi R,
    2. Gentry SN,
    3. Jackson TL
    : Pathways to tumorigenesis--modeling mutation acquisition in stem cells and their progeny. Neoplasia NY N 10: 1170-1182, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Tang DG
    : Understanding cancer stem cell heterogeneity and plasticity. Cell Res 22: 457-472, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Cioffi M,
    2. D'Alterio C,
    3. Camerlingo R,
    4. Tirino V,
    5. Consales C,
    6. Riccio A,
    7. Ieranò C,
    8. Cecere SC,
    9. Losito NS,
    10. Greggi S,
    11. Pignata S,
    12. Pirozzi G,
    13. Scala S
    : Identification of a distinct population of CD133(+)CXCR4(+) cancer stem cells in ovarian cancer. Sci Rep 5: 10357, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Li Z
    : CD133: A stem cell biomarker and beyond. Exp Hematol Oncol 2: 17, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Miraglia S,
    2. Godfrey W,
    3. Yin AH,
    4. Atkins K,
    5. Warnke R,
    6. Holden JT,
    7. Bray RA,
    8. Waller EK,
    9. Buck DW
    : A novel five-transmembrane hematopoietic stem cell antigen: isolation, characterization, and molecular cloning. Blood 90: 5013-5021, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Yin AH,
    2. Miraglia S,
    3. Zanjani ED,
    4. Almeida-Porada G,
    5. Ogawa M,
    6. Leary AG,
    7. Olweus J,
    8. Kearney J,
    9. Buck DW
    : AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood 90: 5002-5012, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Beier D,
    2. Hau P,
    3. Proescholdt M,
    4. Lohmeier A,
    5. Wischhusen J,
    6. Oefner PJ,
    7. Aigner L,
    8. Brawanski A,
    9. Bogdahn U,
    10. Beier CP
    : CD133(+) and CD133(-) glioblastoma-derived cancer stem cells show differential growth characteristics and molecular profiles. Cancer Res 67: 4010-4015, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Qu H,
    2. Li R,
    3. Liu Z,
    4. Zhang J,
    5. Luo R
    : Prognostic value of cancer stem cell marker CD133 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 6: 2644-2650, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Li B,
    2. McCrudden CM,
    3. Yuen HF,
    4. Xi X,
    5. Lyu P,
    6. Chan KW,
    7. Zhang SD,
    8. Kwok HF
    : CD133 in brain tumor: the prognostic factor. Oncotarget 8: 11144-11159, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kazama S,
    2. Kishikawa J,
    3. Kiyomatsu T,
    4. Kawai K,
    5. Nozawa H,
    6. Ishihara S,
    7. Watanabe T
    : Expression of the stem cell marker CD133 is related to tumor development in colorectal carcinogenesis. Asian J Surg 41: 274-278, 2018.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ferrand A,
    2. Sandrin MS,
    3. Shulkes A,
    4. Baldwin GS
    : Expression of gastrin precursors by CD133-positive colorectal cancer cells is crucial for tumour growth. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA - Mol Cell Res 1793: 477-488, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Zakaria N,
    2. Yusoff NM,
    3. Zakaria Z,
    4. Lim MN,
    5. Baharuddin PJN,
    6. Fakiruddin KS,
    7. Yahaya B
    : Human non-small cell lung cancer expresses putative cancer stem cell markers and exhibits the transcriptomic profile of multipotent cells. BMC Cancer 15: 84, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Immervoll H,
    2. Hoem D,
    3. Sakariassen PØ,
    4. Steffensen OJ,
    5. Molven A
    : Expression of the “stem cell marker” CD133 in pancreas and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas. BMC Cancer 8: 48, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Yin S,
    2. Li J,
    3. Hu C,
    4. Chen X,
    5. Yao M,
    6. Yan M,
    7. Jiang G,
    8. Ge C,
    9. Xie H,
    10. Wan D,
    11. Yang S,
    12. Zheng S,
    13. Gu J
    : CD133 positive hepatocellular carcinoma cells possess high capacity for tumorigenicity. Int J Cancer 120: 1444-1450, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Pellacani D,
    2. Oldridge EE,
    3. Collins AT,
    4. Maitland NJ
    : Prominin-1 (CD133) expression in the prostate and prostate cancer: A marker for quiescent stem cells. Adv Exp Med Biol 777: 167-184, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Zhang M,
    2. Song T,
    3. Yang L,
    4. Chen R,
    5. Wu L,
    6. Yang Z,
    7. Fang J
    : Nestin and CD133: valuable stem cell-specific markers for determining clinical outcome of glioma patients. J Exp Clin Cancer Res CR 27: 85, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Wang B-B,
    2. Li Z-J,
    3. Zhang F-F,
    4. Hou H-T,
    5. Yu J-K,
    6. Li F
    : Clinical significance of stem cell marker CD133 expression in colorectal cancer. Histol Histopathol 31: 299-306, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Costa WH da,
    2. Rocha RM,
    3. Cunha IW da,
    4. Fonseca FP da,
    5. Guimaraes GC,
    6. Zequi S de C
    : CD133 immunohistochemical expression predicts progression and cancer-related death in renal cell carcinoma. World J Urol 30: 553-558, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Sarvi S,
    2. Mackinnon AC,
    3. Avlonitis N,
    4. Bradley M,
    5. Rintoul RC,
    6. Rassl DM,
    7. Wang W,
    8. Forbes SJ,
    9. Gregory CD,
    10. Sethi T
    : CD133+ cancer stem-like cells in small cell lung cancer are highly tumorigenic and chemoresistant but sensitive to a novel neuropeptide antagonist. Cancer Res 74: 1554-1565, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Ponta H,
    2. Sherman L,
    3. Herrlich PA
    : CD44: from adhesion molecules to signalling regulators. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 4: 33-45, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Herishanu Y,
    2. Gibellini F,
    3. Njuguna N,
    4. Hazan-Halevy I,
    5. Keyvanfar K,
    6. Lee E,
    7. Wilson W,
    8. Wiestner A
    : CD44 signaling via PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK pathways protects CLL cells from spontaneous and drug induced apoptosis through MCL-1. Leuk Lymphoma 52: 1758-1769, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Leung EL-H,
    2. Fiscus RR,
    3. Tung JW,
    4. Tin VP-C,
    5. Cheng LC,
    6. Sihoe AD-L,
    7. Fink LM,
    8. Ma Y,
    9. Wong MP
    : Non-small cell lung cancer cells expressing CD44 are enriched for stem cell-like properties. PLOS ONE 5: e14062, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Raha D,
    2. Wilson TR,
    3. Peng J,
    4. Peterson D,
    5. Yue P,
    6. Evangelista M,
    7. Wilson C,
    8. Merchant M,
    9. Settleman J
    : The cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase is required to maintain a drug-tolerant tumor cell subpopulation. Cancer Res 74: 3579-3590, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Ma I,
    2. Allan AL
    : The role of human aldehyde dehydrogenase in normal and cancer stem cells. Stem Cell Rev 7: 292-306, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Jiang F,
    2. Qiu Q,
    3. Khanna A,
    4. Todd NW,
    5. Deepak J,
    6. Xing L,
    7. Wang H,
    8. Liu Z,
    9. Su Y,
    10. Stass SA,
    11. Katz RL
    : Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 is a tumor stem cell-associated marker in lung cancer. Mol Cancer Res MCR 7: 330-338, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Xiao Z,
    3. Wong SK-M,
    4. Tin VP-C,
    5. Ho K-Y,
    6. Wang J,
    7. Sham M-H,
    8. Wong MP
    : Lung cancer tumorigenicity and drug resistance are maintained through ALDH(hi)CD44(hi) tumor initiating cells. Oncotarget 4: 1698-1711, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Kahlert C,
    2. Gaitzsch E,
    3. Steinert G,
    4. Mogler C,
    5. Herpel E,
    6. Hoffmeister M,
    7. Jansen L,
    8. Benner A,
    9. Brenner H,
    10. Chang-Claude J,
    11. Rahbari N,
    12. Schmidt T,
    13. Klupp F,
    14. Grabe N,
    15. Lahrmann B,
    16. Koch M,
    17. Halama N,
    18. Büchler M,
    19. Weitz J
    : Expression analysis of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 (ALDH1A1) in colon and rectal cancer in association with prognosis and response to chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 19: 4193-4201, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Ding X,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Jiang C
    : ABCG2: A potential marker of stem cells and novel target in stem cell and cancer therapy. Life Sci 86: 631-637, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Naylor CS,
    2. Jaworska E,
    3. Branson K,
    4. Embleton MJ,
    5. Chopra R
    : Side population/ABCG2-positive cells represent a heterogeneous group of haemopoietic cells: Implications for the use of adult stem cells in transplantation and plasticity protocols. Bone Marrow Transplant 35: 353-360, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Fatima S,
    2. Zhou S,
    3. Sorrentino BP
    : Abcg2 expression marks tissue-specific stem cells in multiple organs in a mouse progeny tracking model. Stem Cells Dayt Ohio 30: 210-221, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    1. Wang H,
    2. Luo F,
    3. Zhu Z,
    4. Xu Z,
    5. Huang X,
    6. Ma R,
    7. He H,
    8. Zhu Y,
    9. Shao K,
    10. Zhao J
    : ABCG2 is a potential prognostic marker of overall survival in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BMC Cancer 17: 222, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Liang S-C,
    2. Yang C-Y,
    3. Tseng J-Y,
    4. Wang H-L,
    5. Tung C-Y,
    6. Liu H-W,
    7. Chen C-Y,
    8. Yeh Y-C,
    9. Chou T-Y,
    10. Yang M-H,
    11. Whang-Peng J,
    12. Lin C-H
    : ABCG2 localizes to the nucleus and modulates CDH1 expression in lung cancer cells. Neoplasia NY N 17: 265-278, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Pan GJ,
    2. Chang ZY,
    3. Schöler HR,
    4. Pei D
    : Stem cell pluripotency and transcription factor Oct4. Cell Res 12: 321-329, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Matoba R,
    2. Niwa H,
    3. Masui S,
    4. Ohtsuka S,
    5. Carter MG,
    6. Sharov AA,
    7. Ko MSH
    : Dissecting Oct3/4-regulated gene networks in embryonic stem cells by expression profiling. PLOS ONE 1: e26, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Hayashi H,
    2. Arao T,
    3. Togashi Y,
    4. Kato H,
    5. Fujita Y,
    6. De Velasco MA,
    7. Kimura H,
    8. Matsumoto K,
    9. Tanaka K,
    10. Okamoto I,
    11. Ito A,
    12. Yamada Y,
    13. Nakagawa K,
    14. Nishio K
    : The OCT4 pseudogene POU5F1B is amplified and promotes an aggressive phenotype in gastric cancer. Oncogene 34: 199-208, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Kumar SM,
    2. Liu S,
    3. Lu H,
    4. Zhang H,
    5. Zhang PJ,
    6. Gimotty PA,
    7. Guerra M,
    8. Guo W,
    9. Xu X
    : Acquired cancer stem cell phenotypes through Oct4-mediated dedifferentiation. Oncogene 31: 4898-4911, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Zhao Q-W,
    2. Zhou Y-W,
    3. Li W-X,
    4. Kang B,
    5. Zhang X-Q,
    6. Yang Y,
    7. Cheng J,
    8. Yin S-Y,
    9. Tong Y,
    10. He J-Q,
    11. Yao H-P,
    12. Zheng M,
    13. Wang Y-J
    : Akt-mediated phosphorylation of Oct4 is associated with the proliferation of stem-like cancer cells. Oncol Rep 33: 1621-1629, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Cai N,
    2. Li M,
    3. Qu J,
    4. Liu G-H,
    5. Izpisua Belmonte JC
    : Post-translational modulation of pluripotency. J Mol Cell Biol 4: 262-265, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Liao B,
    2. Jin Y
    : Wwp2 mediates Oct4 ubiquitination and its own auto-ubiquitination in a dosage-dependent manner. Cell Res 20: 332-344, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Sarkar A,
    2. Hochedlinger K
    : The sox family of transcription factors: versatile regulators of stem and progenitor cell fate. Cell Stem Cell 12: 15-30, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Ellis P,
    2. Fagan BM,
    3. Magness ST,
    4. Hutton S,
    5. Taranova O,
    6. Hayashi S,
    7. McMahon A,
    8. Rao M,
    9. Pevny L
    : SOX2, a persistent marker for multipotential neural stem cells derived from embryonic stem cells, the embryo or the adult. Dev Neurosci 26: 148-165, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Weina K,
    2. Utikal J
    : SOX2 and cancer: Current research and its implications in the clinic. Clin Transl Med 3: 19, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Hyslop L,
    2. Stojkovic M,
    3. Armstrong L,
    4. Walter T,
    5. Stojkovic P,
    6. Przyborski S,
    7. Herbert M,
    8. Murdoch A,
    9. Strachan T,
    10. Lako M
    : Downregulation of NANOG induces differentiation of human embryonic stem cells to extraembryonic lineages. Stem Cells 23: 1035-1043, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  61. ↵
    1. Gong S,
    2. Li Q,
    3. Jeter CR,
    4. Fan Q,
    5. Tang DG,
    6. Liu B
    : Regulation of NANOG in cancer cells. Mol Carcinog 54: 679-687, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Moretto-Zita M,
    2. Jin H,
    3. Shen Z,
    4. Zhao T,
    5. Briggs SP,
    6. Xu Y
    : Phosphorylation stabilizes Nanog by promoting its interaction with Pin1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 13312-13317, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Lambert AW,
    2. Pattabiraman DR,
    3. Weinberg RA
    : Emerging biological principles of metastasis. Cell 168: 670-691, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Popper HH
    : Progression and metastasis of lung cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 35: 75-91, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Ellis PM,
    2. Vandermeer R
    : Delays in the diagnosis of lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 3: 183-188, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Valastyan S,
    2. Weinberg RA
    : Tumor metastasis: Molecular insights and evolving paradigms. Cell 147: 275-292, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Chanvorachote P,
    2. Chamni S,
    3. Ninsontia C,
    4. Phiboonchaiyanan PP
    : Potential anti-metastasis natural compounds for lung cancer. Anticancer Res 36: 5707-5717, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Micalizzi DS,
    2. Farabaugh SM,
    3. Ford HL
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: Parallels between normal development and tumor progression. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 15: 117-134, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Nieto MA
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions in development and disease: Old views and new perspectives. Int J Dev Biol 53: 1541-1547, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Cano A,
    2. Pérez-Moreno MA,
    3. Rodrigo I,
    4. Locascio A,
    5. Blanco MJ,
    6. Barrio MG del,
    7. Portillo F,
    8. Nieto MA
    : The transcription factor Snail controls epithelial–mesenchymal transitions by repressing E-cadherin expression. Nat Cell Biol 2: 76-83, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Bolós V,
    2. Peinado H,
    3. Pérez-Moreno MA,
    4. Fraga MF,
    5. Esteller M,
    6. Cano A
    : The transcription factor Slug represses E-cadherin expression and induces epithelial to mesenchymal transitions: a comparison with Snail and E47 repressors. J Cell Sci 116: 499-511, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Liu Y,
    2. El-Naggar S,
    3. Darling DS,
    4. Higashi Y,
    5. Dean DC
    : Zeb1 links epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cellular senescence. Development 135: 579-588, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Song L-B,
    2. Li J,
    3. Liao W-T,
    4. Feng Y,
    5. Yu C-P,
    6. Hu L-J,
    7. Kong Q-L,
    8. Xu L-H,
    9. Zhang X,
    10. Liu W-L,
    11. Li M-Z,
    12. Zhang L,
    13. Kang T-B,
    14. Fu L-W,
    15. Huang W-L,
    16. Xia Y-F,
    17. Tsao SW,
    18. Li M,
    19. Band V,
    20. Band H,
    21. Shi Q-H,
    22. Zeng Y-X,
    23. Zeng M-S
    : The polycomb group protein Bmi-1 represses the tumor suppressor PTEN and induces epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human nasopharyngeal epithelial cells. J Clin Invest 119: 3626-3636, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. ↵
    1. Eger A,
    2. Aigner K,
    3. Sonderegger S,
    4. Dampier B,
    5. Oehler S,
    6. Schreiber M,
    7. Berx G,
    8. Cano A,
    9. Beug H,
    10. Foisner R
    : DeltaEF1 is a transcriptional repressor of E-cadherin and regulates epithelial plasticity in breast cancer cells. Oncogene 24: 2375-2385, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Lamouille S,
    2. Xu J,
    3. Derynck R
    : Molecular mechanisms of epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15: 178-196, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Yilmaz M,
    2. Christofori G
    : EMT, the cytoskeleton, and cancer cell invasion. Cancer Metastasis Rev 28: 15-33, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Jolly MK,
    2. Ware KE,
    3. Gilja S,
    4. Somarelli JA,
    5. Levine H
    : EMT and MET: necessary or permissive for metastasis? Mol Oncol 11: 755-769, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Tsai JH,
    2. Donaher JL,
    3. Murphy DA,
    4. Chau S,
    5. Yang J
    : Spatiotemporal regulation of epithelial-mesenchymal transition is essential for squamous cell carcinoma metastasis. Cancer Cell 22: 725-736, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Shiozawa Y,
    2. Nie B,
    3. Pienta KJ,
    4. Morgan TM,
    5. Taichman RS
    : Cancer stem cells and their role in metastasis. Pharmacol Ther 138: 285-293, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. LI S,
    2. LI Q
    : Cancer stem cells and tumor metastasis. Int J Oncol 44: 1806-1812, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  81. ↵
    1. Mani SA,
    2. Guo W,
    3. Liao M-J,
    4. Eaton EN,
    5. Ayyanan A,
    6. Zhou AY,
    7. Brooks M,
    8. Reinhard F,
    9. Zhang CC,
    10. Shipitsin M,
    11. Campbell LL,
    12. Polyak K,
    13. Brisken C,
    14. Yang J,
    15. Weinberg RA
    : The epithelial-mesenchymal transition generates cells with properties of stem cells. Cell 133: 704-715, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Vermeulen L,
    2. Melo FDSE,
    3. Heijden M van der,
    4. Cameron K,
    5. Jong JH de,
    6. Borovski T,
    7. Tuynman JB,
    8. Todaro M,
    9. Merz C,
    10. Rodermond H,
    11. Sprick MR,
    12. Kemper K,
    13. Richel DJ,
    14. Stassi G,
    15. Medema JP
    : Wnt activity defines colon cancer stem cells and is regulated by the microenvironment. Nat Cell Biol 12: 468-476, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  83. ↵
    1. Moustakas A,
    2. Heldin C-H
    : Signaling networks guiding epithelial–mesenchymal transitions during embryogenesis and cancer progression. Cancer Sci 98: 1512-1520, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Battula VL,
    2. Evans KW,
    3. Hollier BG,
    4. Shi Y,
    5. Marini FC,
    6. Ayyanan A,
    7. Wang R,
    8. Brisken C,
    9. Guerra R,
    10. Andreeff M,
    11. Mani SA
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition-derived cells exhibit multilineage differentiation potential similar to mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 28: 1435-1445, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Asiedu MK,
    2. Ingle JN,
    3. Behrens MD,
    4. Radisky DC,
    5. Knutson KL
    : TGFβ/TNFα-mediated epithelial–mesenchymal transition generates breast cancer stem cells with a claudin-low phenotype. Cancer Res 71: 4707-4719, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  86. ↵
    1. Yang L,
    2. Ping Y-F,
    3. Yu X,
    4. Qian F,
    5. Guo Z-J,
    6. Qian C,
    7. Cui Y-H,
    8. Bian X-W
    : Gastric cancer stem-like cells possess higher capability of invasion and metastasis in association with a mesenchymal transition phenotype. Cancer Lett 310: 46-52, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Moselhy J,
    2. Srinivasan S,
    3. Ankem MK,
    4. Damodaran C
    : Natural products that target cancer stem cells. Anticancer Res 35: 5773-5788, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dandawate PR,
    2. Subramaniam D,
    3. Jensen RA,
    4. Anant S
    : Targeting cancer stem cells and signaling pathways by phytochemicals: Novel approach for breast cancer therapy. Semin Cancer Biol 40-41: 192-208, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  88. ↵
    1. Taylor WF,
    2. Jabbarzadeh E
    : The use of natural products to target cancer stem cells. Am J Cancer Res 7: 1588-1605, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Rauf A,
    2. Imran M,
    3. Orhan IE,
    4. Bawazeer S
    : Health perspectives of a bioactive compound curcumin: A review. Trends Food Sci Technol 74: 33-45, 2018.
    OpenUrl
  90. ↵
    1. Chanvorachote P,
    2. Pongrakhananon V,
    3. Wannachaiyasit S,
    4. Luanpitpong S,
    5. Rojanasakul Y,
    6. Nimmannit U
    : Curcumin sensitizes lung cancer cells to cisplatin-induced apoptosis through superoxide anion-mediated Bcl-2 degradation. Cancer Invest 27: 624-635, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pongrakhananon V,
    2. Nimmannit U,
    3. Luanpitpong S,
    4. Rojanasakul Y,
    5. Chanvorachote P
    : Curcumin sensitizes non-small cell lung cancer cell anoikis through reactive oxygen species-mediated Bcl-2 downregulation. Apoptosis Int J Program Cell Death 15: 574-585, 2010.
    OpenUrl
    1. Lin S-S,
    2. Lai K-C,
    3. Hsu S-C,
    4. Yang J-S,
    5. Kuo C-L,
    6. Lin J-P,
    7. Ma Y-S,
    8. Wu C-C,
    9. Chung J-G
    : Curcumin inhibits the migration and invasion of human A549 lung cancer cells through the inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase-2 and -9 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). Cancer Lett 285: 127-133, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Zhang T
    : Targeting cancer stem cells by curcumin and clinical applications. Cancer Lett 346: 197-205, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  92. ↵
    1. Ramasamy TS,
    2. Ayob AZ,
    3. Myint HHL,
    4. Thiagarajah S,
    5. Amini F
    : Targeting colorectal cancer stem cells using curcumin and curcumin analogues: insights into the mechanism of the therapeutic efficacy. Cancer Cell Int 15: 96, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zhang H,
    2. Yu T,
    3. Wen L,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Fei D,
    6. Jin C
    : Curcumin enhances the effectiveness of cisplatin by suppressing CD133+ cancer stem cells in laryngeal carcinoma treatment. Exp Ther Med 6: 1317-1321, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Zhou Q-M,
    2. Sun Y,
    3. Lu Y-Y,
    4. Zhang H,
    5. Chen Q-L,
    6. Su S-B
    : Curcumin reduces mitomycin C resistance in breast cancer stem cells by regulating Bcl-2 family-mediated apoptosis. Cancer Cell Int 17: 84, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Mukherjee S,
    2. Mazumdar M,
    3. Chakraborty S,
    4. Manna A,
    5. Saha S,
    6. Khan P,
    7. Bhattacharjee P,
    8. Guha D,
    9. Adhikary A,
    10. Mukhjerjee S,
    11. Das T
    : Curcumin inhibits breast cancer stem cell migration by amplifying the E-cadherin/β-catenin negative feedback loop. Stem Cell Res Ther 5: 116, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  94. ↵
    1. Zakaria N,
    2. Satar NA,
    3. Abu Halim NH,
    4. Ngalim SH,
    5. Yusoff NM,
    6. Lin J,
    7. Yahaya BH
    : Targeting lung cancer stem cells: Research and clinical impacts. Front Oncol 7: 80, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Mirza S,
    2. Vasaiya A,
    3. Vora H,
    4. Jain N,
    5. Rawal R
    : Curcumin targets circulating cancer stem cells by inhibiting self-renewal efficacy in non-small cell lung carcinoma. Anticancer Agents Med Chem 17: 859-864, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  96. ↵
    1. Wu L,
    2. Guo L,
    3. Liang Y,
    4. Liu X,
    5. Jiang L,
    6. Wang L
    : Curcumin suppresses stem-like traits of lung cancer cells via inhibiting the JAK2/STAT3 signaling pathway. Oncol Rep 34: 3311-3317, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Zhu JY,
    2. Yang X,
    3. Chen Y,
    4. Jiang Y,
    5. Wang SJ,
    6. Li Y,
    7. Wang XQ,
    8. Meng Y,
    9. Zhu MM,
    10. Ma X,
    11. Huang C,
    12. Wu R,
    13. Xie CF,
    14. Li XT,
    15. Geng SS,
    16. Wu JS,
    17. Zhong CY,
    18. Han HY
    : Curcumin suppresses lung cancer stem cells via inhibiting Wnt/β-catenin and sonic hedgehog pathways. Phytother Res 31: 680-688, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Baharuddin P,
    2. Satar N,
    3. Fakiruddin KS,
    4. Zakaria N,
    5. Lim MN,
    6. Yusoff NM,
    7. Zakaria Z,
    8. Yahaya BH
    : Curcumin improves the efficacy of cisplatin by targeting cancer stem-like cells through p21 and cyclin D1-mediated tumour cell inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer cell lines. Oncol Rep 35: 13-25, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Pinkhien T,
    2. Petpiroon N,
    3. Sritularak B,
    4. Chanvorachote P
    : Batatasin III inhibits migration of human lung cancer cells by suppressing epithelial to mesenchymal transition and FAK-AKT signals. Anticancer Res 37: 6281-6289, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chaotham C,
    2. Pongrakhananon V,
    3. Sritularak B,
    4. Chanvorachote P
    : A bibenzyl from Dendrobium ellipsophyllum inhibits epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and sensitizes lung cancer cells to anoikis. Anticancer Res 34: 1931-1938, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  100. ↵
    1. Hlosrichok A,
    2. Sumkhemthong S,
    3. Sritularak B,
    4. Chanvorachote P,
    5. Chaotham C
    : A bibenzyl from Dendrobium ellipsophyllum induces apoptosis in human lung cancer cells. J Nat Med 72: 615-625, 2018.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Unahabhokha T,
    2. Chanvorachote P,
    3. Sritularak B,
    4. Kitsongsermthon J,
    5. Pongrakhananon V
    : Gigantol inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal process in human lung cancer cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2016: 1-10, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  102. ↵
    1. Charoenrungruang S,
    2. Chanvorachote P,
    3. Sritularak B,
    4. Pongrakhananon V
    : Gigantol, a bibenzyl from Dendrobium draconis, inhibits the migratory behavior of non-small cell lung cancer cells. J Nat Prod 77: 1359-1366, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Klongkumnuankarn P,
    2. Busaranon K,
    3. Chanvorachote P,
    4. Sritularak B,
    5. Jongbunprasert V,
    6. Likhitwitayawuid K
    : Cytotoxic and antimigratory activities of phenolic compounds from Dendrobium brymerianum. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015: 1-9, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Bhummaphan N,
    2. Chanvorachote P
    : Gigantol suppresses cancer stem cell-like phenotypes in lung cancer cells. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015: 1-10, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  104. ↵
    1. Chanvorachote P,
    2. Kowitdamrong A,
    3. Ruanghirun T,
    4. Sritularak B,
    5. Mungmee C,
    6. Likhitwitayawuid K
    : Anti-metastatic activities of bibenzyls from Dendrobium pulchellum. Nat Prod Commun 8: 115-118, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  105. ↵
    1. Bhummaphan N,
    2. Pongrakhananon V,
    3. Sritularak B,
    4. Chanvorachote P
    : Cancer stem cell suppressing activity of chrysotoxine, a bibenzyl from Dendrobium pulchellum. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 364: 332-346, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Bezerra DP,
    2. Soares AKN,
    3. Sousa D,
    4. Pergentino D
    : Overview of the role of vanillin on redox status and cancer development. Oxid Med Cell Longev 2016: 1-9, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lirdprapamongkol K,
    2. Kramb J-P,
    3. Suthiphongchai T,
    4. Surarit R,
    5. Srisomsap C,
    6. Dannhardt G,
    7. Svasti J
    : Vanillin suppresses metastatic potential of human cancer cells through PI3K inhibition and decreases angiogenesis in vivo. J Agric Food Chem 57: 3055-3063, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lirdprapamongkol K,
    2. Sakurai H,
    3. Suzuki S,
    4. Koizumi K,
    5. Prangsaengtong O,
    6. Viriyaroj A,
    7. Ruchirawat S,
    8. Svasti J,
    9. Saiki I
    : Vanillin enhances TRAIL-induced apoptosis in cancer cells through inhibition of NF-kappaB activation. In Vivo 24: 501-506, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  107. ↵
    1. Lirdprapamongkol K,
    2. Sakurai H,
    3. Kawasaki N,
    4. Choo M-K,
    5. Saitoh Y,
    6. Aozuka Y,
    7. Singhirunnusorn P,
    8. Ruchirawat S,
    9. Svasti J,
    10. Saiki I
    : Vanillin suppresses in vitro invasion and in vivo metastasis of mouse breast cancer cells. Eur J Pharm Sci Off J Eur Fed Pharm Sci 25: 57-65, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  108. ↵
    1. Srinual S,
    2. Chanvorachote P,
    3. Pongrakhananon V
    : Suppression of cancer stem-like phenotypes in NCI-H460 lung cancer cells by vanillin through an Akt-dependent pathway. Int J Oncol 50: 1341-1351, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  109. ↵
    1. Zhu X-X,
    2. Ding Y-H,
    3. Wu Y,
    4. Qian L-Y,
    5. Zou H,
    6. He Q
    : Silibinin: A potential old drug for cancer therapy. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 18: 1-8, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  110. ↵
    1. Corominas-Faja B,
    2. Oliveras-Ferraros C,
    3. Cuyàs E,
    4. Segura-Carretero A,
    5. Joven J,
    6. Martin-Castillo B,
    7. Barrajón-Catalán E,
    8. Micol V,
    9. Bosch-Barrera J,
    10. Menendez JA
    : Stem cell-like ALDH(bright) cellular states in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer: a novel mechanism of acquired resistance to erlotinib targetable with the natural polyphenol silibinin. Cell Cycle Georget Tex 12: 3390-3404, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Schwarz Y,
    2. Bondar E,
    3. Shai AB,
    4. Kohen F,
    5. Starr A
    : Molecular mechanisms of inhibition of lung cancer stem cells invasion by a novel soy isoflavone VF166. Eur Respir J 48: PA2838, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  112. ↵
    1. Ghantous A,
    2. Sinjab A,
    3. Herceg Z,
    4. Darwiche N
    : Parthenolide: from plant shoots to cancer roots. Drug Discov Today 18: 894-905, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liao K,
    2. Xia B,
    3. Zhuang Q-Y,
    4. Hou M-J,
    5. Zhang Y-J,
    6. Luo B,
    7. Qiu Y,
    8. Gao Y-F,
    9. Li X-J,
    10. Chen H-F,
    11. Ling W-H,
    12. He C-Y,
    13. Huang Y-J,
    14. Lin Y-C,
    15. Lin Z-N
    : Parthenolide inhibits cancer stem-like side population of nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells via suppression of the NF-κB/COX-2 pathway. Theranostics 5: 302-321, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Guzman ML,
    2. Rossi RM,
    3. Karnischky L,
    4. Li X,
    5. Peterson DR,
    6. Howard DS,
    7. Jordan CT
    : The sesquiterpene lactone parthenolide induces apoptosis of human acute myelogenous leukemia stem and progenitor cells. Blood 105: 4163-4169, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  113. ↵
    1. Lin M,
    2. Bi H,
    3. Yan Y,
    4. Huang W,
    5. Zhang G,
    6. Zhang G,
    7. Tang S,
    8. Liu Y,
    9. Zhang L,
    10. Ma J,
    11. Zhang J
    : Parthenolide suppresses non-small cell lung cancer GLC-82 cells growth via B-Raf/MAPK/Erk pathway. Oncotarget 8: 23436-23447, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Zhao X,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Su L
    : Parthenolide induces apoptosis via TNFRSF10B and PMAIP1 pathways in human lung cancer cells. J Exp Clin Cancer Res CR 33: 3, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Halim H,
    2. Chunhacha P,
    3. Suwanborirux K,
    4. Chanvorachote P
    : Anticancer and antimetastatic activities of renieramycin M, a marine tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid, in human non-small cell lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res 31: 193-201, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  116. ↵
    1. Sirimangkalakitti N,
    2. Chamni S,
    3. Suwanborirux K,
    4. Chanvorachote P
    : Renieramycin M attenuates cancer stem cell-like phenotypes in H460 lung cancer cells. Anticancer Res 37: 615-621, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    1. Miyazaki Y,
    2. Shibuya M,
    3. Sugawara H,
    4. Kawaguchi O,
    5. Hirsoe C
    : Salinomycin, a new antibiotic. J Antibiot (Tokyo) 27: 814-821, 1974.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Arafat K,
    2. Iratni R,
    3. Takahashi T,
    4. Parekh K,
    5. Al Dhaheri Y,
    6. Adrian TE,
    7. Attoub S
    : Inhibitory effects of salinomycin on cell survival, colony growth, migration, and invasion of human non-small cell lung cancer A549 and LNM35: Involvement of NAG-1. PLOS ONE 8: e66931, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Wang Y
    : Effects of salinomycin on cancer stem cell in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. Med Chem Shariqah United Arab Emir 7: 106-111, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  120. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Zhang Q,
    3. Sun J,
    4. Liu H,
    5. Li Q
    : The combination therapy of salinomycin and gefitinib using poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid)-poly(ethylene glycol) nanoparticles for targeting both lung cancer stem cells and cancer cells. OncoTargets Ther 10: 5653-5666, 2017.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 7
July 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lung Cancer Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cell-targeting Natural Compounds
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 8 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Lung Cancer Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cell-targeting Natural Compounds
ARNATCHAI MAIUTHED, WIPA CHANTARAWONG, PITHI CHANVORACHOTE
Anticancer Research Jul 2018, 38 (7) 3797-3809; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12663

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Lung Cancer Stem Cells and Cancer Stem Cell-targeting Natural Compounds
ARNATCHAI MAIUTHED, WIPA CHANTARAWONG, PITHI CHANVORACHOTE
Anticancer Research Jul 2018, 38 (7) 3797-3809; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.12663
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Cancer Stem Cell in Lung Cancer
    • Cancer Stem Cell Markers and Regulatory Proteins
    • CSC and Lung Cancer Metastasis
    • Natural Product Targeting Lung Cancer Stem Cells
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Evidence of Potential Plant-derived Compounds With Anticancer Effects on Lung Cancer: Clinical and Molecular Pharmacology Approaches
  • Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition in Lung Cancer: Potential EMT-Targeting Natural Product-derived Compounds
  • Fractionated Irradiation Enhances Invasion and Migration by Inducing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Stemness-Like Properties in A549 Cells
  • Clinical Significance of Glioma-associated Oncogene 1 Expression in Patients With Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer Administered Adjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 After Curative Surgery
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • cancer stem cell
  • Lung cancer
  • targeting
  • natural product
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire