Abstract
Background/Aim: Gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (MC-G) of the uterine cervix displays distinct morphological features and an aggressive clinical course. The expression status of p16 in the stroma has not been investigated in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix. Stromal p16 expression was evaluated in endocervical adenocarcinomas, including usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA), intestinal-type mucinous carcinoma (MC-I), and MC-G. Whether stromal p16 expression varied significantly according to the histological subtype and whether the expression status is associated with clinicopathological characteristics of MC-G was also investigated. Materials and Methods: Immunostaining of p16 was performed for 24, 19, and 18 cases of UEA, MC-I, and MC-G, respectively. Results: UEA and MC-I subtypes exhibited horizontally continuous, strong nuclear p16 immunoreactivity in the tumor cells, whereas none of the MC-G cases showed diffuse and strong nuclear immunoreactivity for p16 in the tumor cells. Instead, 10 (55.6%) cases of MC-G displayed moderately to strongly positive p16 expression in the stroma. Stromal p16 expression of MC-G was significantly higher than that of normal cervix, UEA, and MC-I. Metastatic MC-G had significantly higher stromal p16 expression than primary MC-G. Further, stromal p16 overexpression in MC-G was associated with advanced stage, parametrial invasion, and lymphovascular invasion. Conclusion: Stromal p16 expression of MC-G was significantly higher than that of normal cervix and other histological subtypes of adenocarcinoma and was associated with advanced stage, parametrial invasion, and lymphovascular invasion, reflecting the aggressive behavior of MC-G. Our observations suggest that stromal p16 expression is involved in the development and progression of MC-G.
The number of cases of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix observed in routine histopathological practice has increased substantially from those reported several decades ago (1). Endocervical adenocarcinoma represents approximately 20% to 25% of cervical carcinomas (2, 3). It can be classified into two main types of tumors, those related to high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) and those unrelated to high-risk HPV (4). The former, which represent the vast majority of endocervical adenocarcinoma, are referred to as endocervical adenocarcinomas of usual type (UEA) and mucinous carcinomas of intestinal type (MC-I), while the latter are dominated by mucinous carcinomas of gastric type (MC-G) (5-7). MC-G of the uterine cervix is a newly-recognized variant of endocervical adenocarcinoma, with distinctive morphological features (7). In contrast to UEA or MC-I, MC-G is frequently located in the upper endocervix and presents as a bulky cervix, without a well-demarcated mass because of its highly infiltrating pattern of growth (8). MC-G is associated with aggressive behavior, and its clinical outcome is worse than that of UEA (2, 9, 10).
In recent years, immunostaining of p16 has been used as a diagnostic aid in gynecological pathology (11). Horizontally continuous and moderate-to-strong nuclear immunoreactivity (block positivity) for p16 reflects an association with high-risk HPV infection and is used as a confirmatory tool for the diagnosis of HPV-related tumors, including squamous cell carcinoma, UEA, and MC-I (12, 13). In contrast, MC-G unrelated to high-risk HPV displays variable patchy p16 immunoreactivity ranging from negative to focal and weak expression with scattered faint foci and interspersed individual negative cells (4). However, unlike p16 expression, MC-G exhibit either strong diffuse overexpression of p53 (missense mutation pattern) or are completely negative for p53 expression (nonsense/frameshift mutation pattern), with both patterns being highly correlated with a TP53 mutation (14). Moreover, both UEA and MC-I exhibit patchy and weak p53 expression (wild-type pattern). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that immunohistochemical analysis of p16 and p53 expression is useful for distinguishing endocervical adenocarcinoma subtypes.
Recently, during the diagnosis of endocervical adenocarcinomas in routine practice, we observed p16 expression in the stromal cells, as well as in the neoplastic glandular epithelial cells. Stromal p16 levels seemed to vary among cases, depending particularly on the histological subtype. Although p16 is commonly used as a biomarker for diagnosing gynecological malignancies, its expression in the stromal component of endocervical adenocarcinomas has not been reported to our knowledge. In this study, we evaluated stromal p16 immunoreactivity in malignant glandular lesions of the uterine cervix and investigated whether stromal p16 expression varied significantly according to the histological subtype. In addition, we examined whether the status of stromal p16 expression was associated with the clinicopathological characteristics of MC-G.
Materials and Methods
Patient selection and tissue specimens. The study protocol (4-2018-0150) was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Severance Hospital (Seoul, Republic of Korea). Between March 2016 and August 2017, tissue samples of UEA, MC-I, and MC-G, were obtained from 24, 19, and 18 patients, respectively. Representative photomicrographs displaying characteristic histopathological features and immunophenotype of each subtype are presented in Figure 1. Corresponding tissue samples from metastatic MC-G were obtained from 11 of the 18 patients with MC-G. Normal cervical tissue samples were also obtained from 10 patients who underwent total hysterectomy for uterine leiomyomata. No patient underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy or neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiation therapy. Clinicopathological information was obtained from electronic medical records and pathology reports. The clinical and pathological details that were reviewed included age of patient at initial diagnosis, greatest dimension of tumor, parametrial extension, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage (15), and lymphovascular invasion. Pathological diagnoses were established following the criteria of the World Health Organization Classification of Tumours of Female Reproductive Organs, revised in 2014 (7).
Pathological examination. Resected tissues obtained by gynecological oncology surgeons were initially examined by pathologists prior to fixation in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 12-24 hours. The fixed tissues were then thoroughly examined macroscopically and sectioned. After processing with an automatic tissue processor (Peloris II; Leica Microsystems, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK), the sections were embedded in paraffin blocks. Four micrometer-thick slices were serially cut from each formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue block using a rotary microtome (RM2245; Leica Microsystems), and mounted onto microscope slides. The slices were stained with hematoxylin and eosin using an automatic staining instrument (Ventana Symphony System; Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA). After staining, a glass coverslip was applied to the slides, which were then submitted to a Board-certified pathologist specializing in gynecological oncology. The pathologist examined the slides by light microscopy (BX43 System Microscope; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and issued definitive pathological diagnoses.
Immunohistochemistry. The 4-μm-thick, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded slices were deparaffinized and rehydrated with xylene and alcohol solutions. Immunostaining was performed using an automatic immunostaining instrument (Ventana Benchmark XT; Ventana Medical Systems) according to the manufacturer's recommendations (14, 16-26). Antigen retrieval was performed using Cell Conditioning Solution CC1 (Ventana Medical Systems). The slices were incubated with primary antibodies against p16 (prediluted, clone E6H4; Ventana Medical Systems) and p53 (1:300, clone DO-7; Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK). After chromogenic visualization using an ultraView Universal DAB Detection Kit (Ventana Medical Systems), slices were counterstained with hematoxylin and sealed with coverslips. Appropriate positive and negative controls were concurrently stained to validate the staining methods. Negative controls were prepared by substituting non-immune serum for the primary antibody so that no detectable staining was obvious. The p16 immunostaining pattern was interpreted as block positivity when p16 expression was strong and horizontally continuous, and included nuclear or nuclear plus cytoplasmic staining. All other p16 immunostaining patterns, including focal or wispy nuclear staining, and blob-like, puddled, or scattered cytoplasmic staining were interpreted as patchy positivity (16, 26, 27). The p53 immunostaining pattern was defined as a missense mutation pattern, nonsense/frameshift mutation pattern, or wild-type pattern when the p53 expression was diffuse and strong (more than 60% of tumor cell nuclei), absent (fewer than 5%), or focal and weakly positive, respectively (7, 14).
Interpretation of stromal p16 immunoreactivity. The percentage of p16-positive stromal cells and staining intensity were assessed as previously described (28-30). The estimated percentages were categorized as follows: absent: score 0, less than 10%: score 1, 10-24%: score 2, 25-49%: score 3, and 50% or more: score 4. The staining intensity was graded as follows: negative: score 0, weak: score 1, moderate: score 2, and strong: score 3. The subcellular locations of the p16-positive signals (nuclear or cytoplasmic) were also estimated. The final immunoreactivity score was calculated as the product of the percentage and staining intensity scores, resulting in scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, or 12. The immunoreactivity scores were categorized as follows: negative: score; weakly positive: scores 1, 2, and 3; moderately positive: scores 4 and 6; strongly positive: scores 8, 9, and 12. In addition, the stromal p16 expression was dichotomized into high (moderately-to-strongly positive) and low (weakly positive/negative) expression for statistical analysis.
Statistical analysis. A linear-by-linear test was performed to examine differences in p16 immunoreactivity according to the histological subtype and to compare the stromal p16 expression between primary and metastatic MC-G. A Fisher's exact test was performed to determine whether there was a significant association between the stromal p16 expression status and the clinicopathological characteristics of MC-G. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Differences with p-values less than 0.05 were considered significant.
Representative photomicrographs showing characteristic histopathological features of endocervical adenocarcinoma. A: Usual-type endocervical adenocarcinoma (UEA) displays a glandular growth pattern with occasional cribriform architecture and papillary projections into glandular lumina. B: Intestinal-type mucinous carcinoma (MC-I) shows a similar pattern of growth to that of UEA, but the glandular epithelium consists of mucin-containing columnar cells. C: Gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (MC-G) shows irregularly dilated, simple glands showing a haphazard growth in desmoplastic stroma. D: High-power view of UEA. The tumor cells are columnar without mucin, with high nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio. Inset: diffuse and strong expression (block positivity) for p16 in tumor cells. E: High-power view of MC-I. Columnar cells with pale, mucin-containing cytoplasm and basally located nuclei are noted. Inset: block positivity for p16 in tumor cells. F: High-power view of MC-G. The tumor cells possess ample, eosinophilic, or clear cytoplasm. Their nuclei have mild-to-moderate atypia. Inset: Left: diffuse, strong expression for p53 (TP53 missense mutation pattern); right: negative p16 immunoreactivity in tumor cells. Original magnifications: A-C, 100×; D-F, 400×.
HPV genotype assay. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based microarray analysis for HPV genotyping was performed using a commercially available HPV 9G DNA chip (BMT HPV 9G DNA Chip; Biometrix Technology, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea) (31, 32). The 9G microarray detected the presence of 14 high-risk (types 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) and five low-risk (types 6, 11, 34, 40, and 42) HPV types; the analyses were performed according to the manufacturer's recommendations (33-36). Briefly, the PCR mixture consisted of 10 μl of the extracted target DNA, 10 μl of BMT Primer set (Biometrix Technology), and PCR premix (Biometrix Technology) that contained dNTP and Taq DNA polymerase in an amplification buffer. Amplification was performed using the following protocol: predenaturation for 5 min at 94°C; 40 sequential cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s; annealing at 45°C for 30 s; elongation at 72°C for 30 s; followed by a final 5-min elongation step at 72°C. The PCR products were electrophoresed in 2% agarose gels to confirm amplification. Each hybridization chamber of the 9G chip was covered with a mixture of the hybridization solution (35 μl) and the polymerase chain reaction product (15 μl) and incubated at 23-26°C for 30 min. After washing, array images were scanned and imaged using a fluorescent scanner (ScanArray GX Microarray Scanner; PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Waltham, MA, USA).
Results
Baseline characteristics. The age of patients with MC-G ranged from 39 to 70 years. Nine (50.0%) patients were 56 years or older. All patients underwent radical hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomies, bilateral pelvic lymph node dissections, with/without para-aortic lymph node dissection or sampling. The greatest dimension of tumor ranged from 2.8 to 6.7 cm. Twelve (66.7%) tumors were greater than 4.0 cm. Parametrial extension was identified in 10 (55.6%) patients. The FIGO stage distribution was as follows: IIA, 27.8% (5/18); IIB, 33.3% (6/18); and III, 38.9% (7/18). The metastatic sites included pelvic lymph nodes in 5/11 (45.5%), ovary in 3/11 (27.3%), pelvic peritoneum in 2/11 (18.2%), and abdominal peritoneum in 1/11 (9.1%). Lymphovascular invasion was observed in nine (50.0%) cases. High-risk HPV was detected in all cases of UEA (24/24) and MC-I (19/19). The most common HPV genotype found was type 18 (24/43, 55.8%). Type 16, detected in 30.2% (13/43) of the cases, was the second most common high-risk HPV genotype in this study. In contrast, none of the MC-G cases were found to be infected with HPV.
p16 Expression in tumor cells according to histological subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Stromal p16 expression according to histological subtype of endocervical adenocarcinoma.
Stromal p16 expression among samples of normal cervix and primary and metastatic gastric-type mucinous carcinoma.
Expression of p16 and p53 in tumor cells. Consistent with the HPV results, all cases of UEA (24/24) and MC-I (19/19) demonstrated p16 block positivity in the nuclei and cytoplasm of tumor cells, whereas in the majority of MC-G cases (15/18, 83.3%) p16 expression was absent from the tumor cells (Table I). The remaining three cases of MC-G (16.7%) exhibited patchy and weak p16 immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm of tumor cells.
The p53 immunostaining patterns of MC-G corresponded with either the missense mutation pattern (13/18, 72.2%) or the nonsense/frameshift mutation pattern (5/18, 27.8%). All cases of UEA (24/24) and MC-I (19/19) showed the wild-type pattern of p53 expression.
Expression of p16 in stromal cells. Representative photomicrographs showing stromal p16 expression in MC-G are presented in Figure 2. Of the 18 cases of MC-G, 10 (55.6%) showed moderately to strongly positive p16 expression in the nuclei and cytoplasm of stromal cells, whereas six (33.3%) and two (11.1%) cases demonstrated weakly positive and negative expression, respectively. No cases of UEA or MC-I exhibited strongly positive stromal p16 expression. Only two (10.5%) cases of MC-I and three (12.5%) cases of UEA showed moderately positive p16 expression in the stromal cells. Most cases of MC-I (12/19, 63.2%) did not show stromal p16 expression. Similarly, in more than half of UEA cases (14/24, 58.3%) stromal p16 immunoreactivity was absent. As shown in Table II, stromal p16 levels were significantly higher in MC-G compared with those in UEA (p<0.001) and MC-I (p<0.001). No significant difference in stromal p16 expression was observed between MC-I and UEA (p=0.753).
Representative photomicrographs showing stromal p16 expression in gastric-type mucinous carcinoma (MC-G). A: Primary MC-G. Variable-sized, irregularly spaced tumor glands invade the desmoplastic stroma. Inflammatory cell infiltrates are associated. B: Metastatic MC-G. The tumor tissue extends through the proper muscle and submucosa into the mucosa of the rectum. C: High-power view of metastatic MC-G. D: Negative, E: moderately positive, and F: strongly positive stromal p16 expression in primary MC-G. F: Strongly positive stromal p16 expression in metastatic MC-G. Original magnifications: A, 200×; B, 40×; C-G, 200×.
The stromal p16 levels in normal cervix, primary MC-G, and metastatic MC-G tissue samples are presented in Table III. Weakly positive cytoplasmic p16 immunoreactivity was observed in seven (70.0%) out of the 10 normal cervical tissue samples, while in the remaining three (30.0%) samples, stromal p16 expression was not detected. The difference in stromal p16 expression between primary MC-G and normal cervix was statistically significant (p<0.001). Moreover, stromal p16 expression in metastatic MC-G was significantly higher than that in the primary MC-G tissue samples (p=0.036). More than half (6/11, 54.5%) of the metastatic MC-G cases exhibited strongly positive p16 immunoreactivity in the stromal cells.
Association between stromal p16 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of MC-G. Relationships between the stromal p16 expression status and clinicopathological characteristics of MC-G are summarized in Table IV. Significant positive correlations were observed between stromal p16 overexpression and both advanced stage (p=0.007) and lymphovascular invasion (p=0.015). There was a marginally significant association between high stromal p16 expression and parametrial extension (p=0.054). However, the associations of stromal p16 expression with patient age and the greatest dimension of tumor were not statistically significant.
Discussion
Unlike studies on p16 expression in epithelial lesions, there have been very few studies applying p16 immunostaining to the stromal component of gynecological lesions. In this study, we investigated stromal p16 expression in adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix. Firstly, we observed a significant increase in stromal p16 expression in primary MC-G tissues compared with that in normal cervical tissues. More than half of the MC-G cases showed moderately-to-strongly positive p16 immunoreactivity in the stromal cells, whereas none of the normal cervical tissue samples exhibited this level of positive stromal p16 expression, suggesting that p16 overexpression in the stroma might modulate the tumor microenvironment to promote MC-G development. Secondly, we noted that metastatic MC-G exhibited significantly higher p16 levels in the stromal cells compared with primary MC-G. The proportion of metastatic MC-G cases with strongly positive stromal p16 immunoreactivity (54.5%) was significantly higher than that of primary MC-G (16.7%), suggesting that stromal p16 expression may influence the metastatic progression of MC-G. Our data are consistent with previous reports that p16 promotes invasiveness through interactions with other molecules associated with tumor cell migration and invasion (28, 37-40), as well as with our recent studies demonstrating stromal p16 overexpression in ovarian and endometrial carcinomas (29, 30). We have also shown here that ovarian carcinoma displays significantly higher stromal p16 expression than benign and borderline ovarian tumors. Similarly, significantly higher stromal p16 expression was observed in endometrial carcinomas than in benign and precancerous lesions of the endometrium. Another study on stromal p16 expression in breast carcinoma reported that ductal carcinoma in situ with increased stromal p16 expression tended to show estrogen receptor negativity and a high Ki-67 labeling index, and that stromal p16 overexpression is an independent predictor of recurrence with a higher relative risk than other established prognostic parameters (41).
The overexpression of p16 occurs in malignant tumors via two different mechanisms. The first is an abnormality in the retinoblastoma protein pathway. Physiologically, p16 inactivates cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6, blocking phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma protein and induces cell-cycle arrest. Loss of p16 function allows deregulated cellular proliferation (42). Paradoxically, some malignant tumors exhibit p16 overexpression, HPV-related tumors being a well-known example. The HPV oncoprotein E7 inactivates the retinoblastoma protein, which results in the release of p16 due to its negative feedback control and up-regulation of CDKN2A/p16 (43). Given the fact that MC-G is unrelated to HPV infection, our observation of stromal p16 overexpression in MC-G may be explained by a positive feedback mechanism caused by deregulation of the retinoblastoma protein pathway (43). The second mechanism of p16 overexpression is oncogene-induced cell senescence. Based on the notion that p16 induces cellular senescence (28), we also postulated that stromal p16 overexpression is indicative of stromal cell senescence and that the senescent stroma contributes to disease progression by secreting inflammatory mediators, cytokines, and proteases, which together mediate tumor progression. Further studies are necessary to clarify the mechanism of stromal p16 expression in MC-G.
Association between stromal p16 expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with cervical gastric-type mucinous carcinoma.
We further observed a significant increase in stromal p16 expression in MC-G compared with that in UEA and MC-I. UEA and MC-I showed moderate p16 positivity in 12.5% and 10.5% of the cases examined, respectively. In contrast, 55.6% of the MC-G cases had moderately-to-strongly positive p16 expression in the stromal cells. Consistent with this finding, we have previously observed differences in stromal p16 expression according to the histological subtype in ovarian and endometrial carcinomas (29, 30). Among endometrial carcinomas, serous tumors show significantly higher p16 expression than endometrioid tumors. Similarly, serous endometrial intraepithelial carcinoma, a precancerous lesion of serous carcinoma, shows higher stromal p16 expression than atypical hyperplasia/endometrioid intraepithelial neoplasia, a precancerous lesion of endometrioid carcinoma. These data suggest that stromal p16 expression may, at least partly, be reflective of the more aggressive behavior and worse prognosis of endometrial serous carcinoma than those of endometrial endometrioid carcinoma. Our observation that MC-G displays higher stromal p16 expression than UEA and MC-I may also reflect the more aggressive nature of MC-G compared with that of the other two histological subtypes of endocervical adenocarcinoma. This concept is further supported by our observations that stromal p16 overexpression is associated with advanced stage, parametrial extension, and lymphovascular invasion in patients with MC-G. Further studies on the clinicopathological and prognostic significance of stromal p16 expression of MC-G, with a larger patient cohort are necessary.
In conclusion, we demonstrated stromal p16 expression in tissue samples of endocervical adenocarcinoma using immunohistochemistry. Stromal p16 expression in metastatic MC-G was significantly higher than that in primary MC-G, which in turn was significantly higher than that in normal cervical tissue samples. Moreover, the stromal p16 expression in MC-G was significantly higher than that in UEA and MC-I. In patients with MC-G, stromal p16 overexpression was associated with advanced stage, parametrial extension, and lymphovascular invasion. Collectively, our data suggest that p16 overexpression in stromal cells is involved in the development and progression of MC-G, as well as in its aggressive behavior.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A1B03935584) and a Korean Society of Pathology Grant (2016).
Footnotes
↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.
This article is freely accessible online.
- Received April 4, 2018.
- Revision received May 10, 2018.
- Accepted May 15, 2018.
- Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved
References
In this issue
Jump to section
Related Articles
Cited By...
- Invasive Stratified Mucin-producing Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: Comparison of Its Clinicopathological Characteristics and Programmed Death-ligand 1 Expression Status With Those of Other Endocervical Adenocarcinomas
- Ovarian Metastasis from Human Papillomavirus-associated Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathological Characteristics for Distinguishing from Primary Ovarian Mucinous or Endometrioid Tumor
- Mesonephric-like Adenocarcinoma of the Uterine Corpus: Comprehensive Analyses of Clinicopathological, Molecular, and Prognostic Characteristics With Retrospective Review of 237 Endometrial Carcinoma Cases
- Invasive Stratified Mucin-producing Carcinoma (ISMC) of the Uterine Cervix: Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics With Special Emphasis on the First Description of Consistent Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) Over-expression
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Microscopic Tubal Intraepithelial Metastases from Adenocarcinoma and Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Gastric-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Misdiagnosed as an Endometrial, Ovarian or Extragenital Malignancy, or Mistyped as Usual-type Endocervical Adenocarcinoma
- Expression of Insulin-like Growth Factor II mRNA-binding Protein 3 in Gallbladder Carcinoma
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Squamous Cell Carcinoma and High-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions Involving Endocervical Polyps
- Primary Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma Misinterpreted as Metastatic Breast Carcinoma: A Rare Encounter in Peritoneal Fluid Cytology
- Targeted Sequencing of Tubo-ovarian and Peritoneal High-grade Serous Carcinoma With Wild-type p53 Immunostaining Pattern
- Clinicopathological Characteristics of Ovarian Metastasis from Colorectal and Pancreatobiliary Carcinomas Mimicking Primary Ovarian Mucinous Tumor