Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Tumor Enhancement on Dynamic CT: A Predictive Factor for Recurrence After Nephrectomy in Localized T1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

JUNKI MAEHARA, AKIHIRO NISHIE, YOSHIKI ASAYAMA, KOUSEI ISHIGAMI, YASUHIRO USHIJIMA, YUKIHISA TAKAYAMA, DAISUKE OKAMOTO, NOBUHIRO FUJITA, MASAAKI SUGIMOTO, JUNICHI INOKUCHI and HIROSHI HONDA
Anticancer Research April 2018, 38 (4) 2377-2383;
JUNKI MAEHARA
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIHIRO NISHIE
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: anishie@radiol.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
YOSHIKI ASAYAMA
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOUSEI ISHIGAMI
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUHIRO USHIJIMA
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKIHISA TAKAYAMA
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAISUKE OKAMOTO
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NOBUHIRO FUJITA
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAAKI SUGIMOTO
2Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUNICHI INOKUCHI
3Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROSHI HONDA
1Department of Clinical Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To investigate whether radiological parameters obtained on dynamic computed tomography (CT), especially those related to tumor enhancement, are predictive factors for recurrence after nephrectomy in localized stage T1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Materials and Methods: We retrospectively studied 88 patients with localized stage T1 ccRCC who underwent dynamic CT preoperatively. Seven patients had recurrent disease after surgery. Tumor attenuations were measured by placing a region of interest in the solid region. TApre and TAneph were defined as the tumor attenuation values of the pre-contrast and nephrographic phase, respectively. The correlations between disease-free survival and clinicopathological factors, including the radiological parameter TAneph − TApre (ΔTAneph), were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards model or Kaplan–Meier method with the log-rank test. Results: Only ΔTAneph was significantly and positively correlated with disease-free survival (p<0.05). Tumor size also tended to be negatively correlated with disease-free survival (p<0.1). The 5- and 10-year disease-free survival rates of the group with high ΔTAneph (≥86 HU) were 97.4% and 97.4%, while those of the group with low ΔTAneph (<86 HU) were 89.6% and 71.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase of CT was a predictive factor for recurrence after nephrectomy in patients with localized stage T1 ccRCC.

  • RCC
  • clear cell
  • CT
  • recurrence
  • tumor enhancement

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is the most common type of cancer observed in the adult kidney (1). Although there are several subtypes of RCC, clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) accounts for 70% of all cases (2). Typically, ccRCCs enhance avidly and heterogeneously on dynamic computed tomography (CT) (3, 4). Nonetheless, some ccRCCs enhance poorly and homogeneously, with their imaging features overlapping features that are more typical of the non-clear-cell variants, such as papillary or chromophobe RCCs (5). High microvascular density (MVD) has been reported to be a predictive factor of metastasis, recurrence and prognosis in ccRCC (2, 6), but other reports have suggested that a low MVD predicts distant metastasis and poor prognosis (7, 8). Because the relationship between tumor vascularity and prognosis in ccRCC is controversial, further validation is required. High-grade ccRCC frequently contains foci of fibrosis (7). In addition, Pichler et al. reported that the presence of histological tumor necrosis represents an independent predictor with respect to metastasis-free and overall survival in patients with clear cell and papillary RCC (9). Therefore, we hypothesized that a radiological parameter reflecting such histological findings could be a predictive factor obtained in a noninvasive fashion.

One of the strongest validated prognostic factors in RCC is tumor stage (anatomical extent of disease) (10). Nevertheless, stage T1 ccRCC can also recur or metastasize after surgery (11). It would, therefore, be clinically helpful if we could recognize patients with stage T1 ccRCC for whom particular care should be taken. Tumor size and Furman grade have been reported to be prognostic factors at stage pT1 ccRCC (12, 13).

To the best of our knowledge, few radiological parameters have been reported as prognostic factors of ccRCC in contrast to biological and pathological markers (14-17). Tumor enhancement of ccRCC on dynamic CT is diverse. This enhancement is supposed to reflect tumor vascularity and the presence of fibrous stroma, necrosis and hemorrhage, etc. Furthermore, differences in tumor volume may influence dynamics of contrast agent within a tumor. The volume of a contrast agent used in daily practice may be insufficient for evaluating tumor enhancement or vascularity of a large tumor even if the same scan timing is used. This potentially confounding factor can be excluded by focusing only on small tumors.

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether radiological parameters obtained on dynamic CT, especially those related to tumor enhancement, are predictive of recurrence after nephrectomy in localized stage T1 ccRCC.

Materials and Methods

Patients. We conducted a retrospective study based on medical data archived at our hospital. Institutional Review Board approval (no. 28-121) was obtained, and the requirements for informed consent were waived. We enrolled 189 patients who had been diagnosed with ccRCC after surgery between January 2001 and May 2013. All patients had undergone a preoperative dynamic CT examination and radical or partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. A preoperative dynamic CT examination was performed within 3 months before surgery. Nine patients were excluded due to the presence of lymph node or distant metastasis. In seven patients, the tumor was pathologically diagnosed as more advanced than stage T2. Eighty-five patients who were not followed-up at our hospital for more than 2 years were also excluded. The final study group thus consisted of 88 patients with localized ccRCC (TNM staging: T1N0M0): 64 T1a and 24 T1b. The details of the patient profiles and pathological findings are summarized in Table I. Each patient had only one RCC. The surgical methods performed included total nephrectomy in 45 patients and partial nephrectomy in 43 patients. After surgery, chest-abdomen-pelvis CT examinations were performed every 3, 6, or 12 months, for the purpose of surveillance for recurrence and metastasis. A few patients underwent dynamic CT examinations to rule out surgical complications while they were in the hospital. The frequency of complications in our population was low in comparison with the previous report (18). Disease-free survival was defined as the time from surgery to the first documentation of recurrence or distant metastasis on CT reports. Recurrence or distant metastasis was defined as a new solid lesion showing interval increase in size on a series of follow-up CT.

Dynamic CT. Preoperative CT was performed with a 4- or 64-multidetector row CT (MDCT) scanner (Aquilion, Toshiba Medical, Tokyo, Japan). First, pre-contrast CT images were scanned. A total of 100 ml of a nonionic iodinated contrast agent (iopamidol: Iopamiron 370; Bayer, Osaka, Japan) was injected through the antecubital vein for 40 s at an injection rate of 2.5 ml/s using a power injector. The time delays for scanning for corticomedullary-, nephrographic- and excretory-phase images were 45 (4-MDCT) or 48 (64-MDCT) s, 90 s, and 240 s, respectively. The scanning parameters with 4-MDCT were 120 kVp, 300 mAs, 3-mm collimation reconstructed to a slice thickness of 5 mm, and a pitch of 3, while the scanning parameters with 64-MDCT were 120 kVp, automatically set mAs, 0.5-mm collimation reconstructed to a slice thickness of 5 mm, and a pitch of 53. The images were obtained in the craniocaudal direction.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients profile and pathological findings of localized stage T1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma*.

Image analysis. All CT images were independently reviewed by two radiologists (J.M. and A.N., with 3 and 22 years of experience, respectively). After the entire slices describing each tumor were observed, one slice including as large an area of the solid region of the tumor as possible was visually selected. A round or oval region of interest (ROI) was placed on the tumor to measure tumor attenuation in each dynamic phase (pre-contrast, corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phases). The ROI was carefully positioned to cover as much of the solid region of the tumor as possible, while avoiding any region of necrosis or hemorrhage. An ROI of the same size was placed at the same position on the image of each phase by copy and paste method.

TApre, TAcor, TAneph and TAex were defined as tumor attenuation values of pre-contrast, corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phases, respectively. By referring to these four values, a total of five radiological parameters were evaluated:i) TApre itself, which may reflect cytoplasmic fat in ccRCC (19); ii) TAcor − TApre and iii) TAneph − TApre (ΔTAneph), which may represent tumor enhancement; iv) absolute percentage washout using the corticomedullary phase (APWcor)=(TAcor − TAex)/(TAcor − TApre) ×100; and v) absolute percentage washout using the nephrographic phase (APWneph)=(TAneph − TAex)/(ΔTAneph) × 100. APWcor and APWneph may be affected by the amount of fibrosis in the tumor (20). These five radiological parameters were measured by the two radiologists. The average values were applied to the evaluation.

Pathological diagnosis. The resected specimens were sliced by making a series of axial incisions approximately 5 mm apart according to CT sections. In all cases, the entire area of the cut surface containing the greatest tumor dimensions was submitted for pathological examination. These specimens were fixed in 10% formalin, cut into 4-μm sections, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin. Additional samples were also taken from other parts to evaluate the pathological findings, including the tumor size, growth/invasion pattern, Fuhrman grade, histological subtype, and venous invasion. We employed the worst nuclear grade as the Fuhrman grade here.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Five radiological parameters in patients according to recurrence of localized stage T1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Data are the mean±SD (range).

Statistical analysis. The above radiological parameters were compared between groups with and without recurrence using Student's t-test. The clinicopathological factors evaluated were patient age and gender, surgical method, tumor side, tumor size, Fuhrman grade, growth/invasion pattern, venous invasion, and the above radiological parameters. We analyzed the correlations between these factors and ccRCC disease-free survival using the Cox proportional hazards model or the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test (univariate analysis). The Cox proportional hazards model was applied for continuous variables, while the Kaplan-Meier analysis with the log-rank test was used for independent variables. When there was a significant correlation between a continuous variable and disease-free survival using the Cox proportional hazard model, Kaplan–Meier analysis with log-rank test was added. The threshold for division into two groups was obtained based on the median value. Pearson's correlation coefficient was also calculated to assess the inter-reader variability in measurement of ΔTAneph. p-Values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate significance.

Results

Seven out of the 88 patients (8.0%) had recurrent disease 0.3 to 89.3 months after the day of surgery, and the remaining 81 patients showed no recurrence at 24.0 to 163.6 months after surgery. The median postoperative follow-up duration of the whole patient cohort was 66.8 months. Recurrence was clinically diagnosed on CT. The sites of recurrence the seven patients were bone in three, lung in three, and local, pancreas, contralateral kidney and lymph nodes in one each. Three patients had recurrent lesions in two organs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate analyses of clinicopathological factors and disease-free survival in patients with localized stage T1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Details of the five radiological parameters in patients according to recurrence are shown in Table II. The average ΔTAneph in group without recurrence was significantly higher than that in group with (p=0.048). There was no significant difference in the other four radiological parameters between the two groups.

The results for the univariate analyses are summarized in Table III. Most tumors showed expansive growth; one tumor had an intermediate pattern and thus its growth/invasion could not be evaluated. As a result, only ΔTAneph was significantly and positively correlated with disease-free survival (p<0.05). Tumor size also tended to be negatively correlated with disease-free survival (p<0.1).

We generated and analyzed a disease-free survival curve according to ΔTAneph (Figure 1). The median value of ΔTAneph in 88 ccRCCs was 86 HU. Based on this value, all ccRCCs were divided into one of two groups: a high ΔTAneph group (≥86 HU) and a low ΔTAneph group (<86 HU). The 5-year disease-free survival rate of the high ΔTAneph group was 97.4%, and that of the low ΔTAneph group was 89.6%. The 10-year disease-free survival rates were 97.4% and 71.6%, respectively. The disease-free survival rate of the group with high ΔTAneph was significantly higher than that of those with a low ΔTAneph (p<0.05). For the other four parameters, no significant correlation with disease-free survival was obtained.

The Pearson's correlation coefficient between ΔTAneph values measured by two radiologists was 0.90, suggesting excellent inter-reader agreement.

Representative cases are shown in Figures 2 and 3.

Discussion

The radiological parameter ΔTAneph represents tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase. In the present study this tumor enhancement was a predictive factor for recurrence after nephrectomy in localized stage T1 ccRCC. To the best of our knowledge, a predictive factor obtained by preoperative dynamic CT has rarely been reported (14). The parameter ΔTAneph may be clinically useful because it can be used in the selection of a therapeutic strategy and in the determination of an appropriate interval for follow-up imaging after surgery. It also can be obtained in a non-invasive fashion and without extra radiation exposure.

The ccRCCs demonstrating low tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase showed a significantly higher incidence of recurrence. We consider that two factors, namely tumor vascularity and contrast agent dynamics in the stroma of the tumor, may be associated with tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase. Another radiological parameter, TAcor − TApre, may represent tumor vascularity more directly. This parameter, however, was not associated with prognosis in the present study. There was no significant difference in TAcor − TApre between the groups according to recurrence. According to these results, the relevance of tumor vascularity to recurrence may be less considered. Neither APWcor nor APWneph was a predictive factor, although these parameters have been shown to account for contrast agent dynamics in the stroma (20). The amount of fibrosis in the tumor may not be correlated with recurrence either. There is also a possibility that contrast agent may drain faster in a tumor with a higher MVD and that this change manifests as lower attenuation in the nephrographic phase. However, there was no significant difference in average TAcor − TAneph between groups with and without recurrence (47.3 HU vs. 51.9 HU, calculated from Table II).

Regions showing massive necrosis or hemorrhage were avoided when placing ROIs on each tumor in the present study, but the presence of minute and scattered necrosis in a tumor can contribute to low tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase, as the spatial resolution of CT would limit its detection. Tumor necrosis is defined as microscopic coagulative necrosis characterized by homogeneous clusters and sheets of degenerating and dead cells (9). Veeratterapillay et al. suggested that necrosis might have contributed to their findings of lower maximum contrast enhancement on dynamic CT even though they specifically avoided cystic change, necrosis and calcification when placing their ROIs on tumors (14). Again, the presence of histological tumor necrosis is reported to represent an independent predictor with respect to metastasis-free and overall survival in patients with clear cell and papillary RCC (9). These reports support our hypothesis regarding the prognostic significance of tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase. Although minute and scattered necrosis in a tumor may be correlated with worse tumor grade (21), the Fuhrman grade itself was not a predictive factor in the present study. We consider that ΔTAneph may reflect minute and scattered necrosis in a tumor rather than tumor vascularity and fibrous stroma. Veeratterapillay et al. (14) proposed maximum contrast enhancement in the corticomedullary phase as a prognostic factor of ccRCC. Because our patient population and analysis approach were different from theirs, it is difficult to state which parameter is more useful in this regard.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Disease-free survival curves of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) according to TAneph − TApre (ΔTAneph). The median value of ΔTAneph in 88 ccRCCs was 86 HU. Based on this value, ccRCCs were divided into two groups: high ΔTAneph group (≥86 HU) and low ΔTAneph group (<86 HU). The disease-free survival rate of the high ΔTAneph group was significantly higher than that of the low ΔTAneph group (p<0.05). TApre, TAneph: Pre-contrast and nephrographic phase tumor attenuation, respectively.

Tumor size has been reported to be a prognostic factor for ccRCC (22). Tumor size and age at diagnosis were reported as prognostic factors at T1 stage (23-25). The present study, however, showed no significant correlation between tumor size and recurrence after surgery although tumor size tended to be correlated with disease-free survival. Our findings suggest that tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase is of greater value than tumor size for prediction of recurrence. This parameter can also be measured and calculated with ease. For data analysis, we used average values of the five radiological parameters measured independently by the two radiologists. Inter-reader agreement of ΔTAneph was excellent. This parameter has high reproducibility and is suitable for practical use.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Pre-contrast (a), corticomedullary phase (b), nephrographic phase (c), excretory phase (d), and postoperative (e and f) chest computed tomography (CT) for a 58-year-old female with 3.8-cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma showing low TAneph − TApre (ΔTAneph). Preoperative dynamic CT revealed a heterogeneously enhanced mass in the left kidney (a-d). On each image, a region of interest was placed to cover as much of the solid region of the mass as possible, while avoiding hemorrhage, degeneration and necrosis. The TApre, TAcor, TAneph and TAex values were 47.7, 181.6, 120.5 and 100.9 HU, respectively. ΔTAneph was 72.8 HU. Chest CT 44.1 months after surgery showed lung (e) and bone (f) metastases (arrows). TApre, TAcor, TAneph, TAex: Pre-contrast, corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phase tumor attenuation, respectively.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Pre-contrast (a), corticomedullary phase (b), nephrographic phase (c), excretory phase (d) for a 35-year-old male with 5.4-cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma showing high TAneph − TApre (ΔTAneph). Preoperative dynamic CT revealed a heterogeneously enhanced mass in the right kidney. On each image, a region of interest was placed to cover as much of the solid region of the mass as possible, while avoiding hemorrhage, degeneration and necrosis. The TApre, TAcor, TAneph and TAex values were 21.2, 150.3, 110.4 and 76.3 HU, respectively. ΔTAneph was 89.2 HU. This case showed no recurrence 69.0 months after surgery. TApre, TAcor, TAneph, TAex: Pre-contrast, corticomedullary, nephrographic and excretory phase tumor attenuation, respectively.

There are a few limitations to the present study. Firstly, two CT protocols were used for evaluation. This is a problem that occurred due to renewal of CT equipment at our Institution because we collected patients who underwent nephrectomy between January 2001 and May 2013. The scan timing of the corticomedullary phase slightly differed between the protocols, although the difference was only 3 s. However, since the scan timing of the nephrographic phase was identical, it was assumed there would be no influence on ΔTAneph. Secondly, the amount and injection speed of contrast agent were constant. A different result for TAcor − TApre can be obtained if they are adjusted based on the body weight of a patient. Thirdly, only a small number of patients (8.0%) showed recurrence after surgery in the present study. This is probably due to our patients our inclusion of patients with pT1 stage ccRCC only. The volume of contrast agent used in daily practice may be insufficient for evaluating tumor enhancement or the vascularity of a large tumor even if the same scan timing is used. To exclude this potentially cofounding factor, we decided to focus only on small tumors. Muramaki et al. reported that postoperative disease recurrence developed in 5.2% of localized pT1 RCCs (25). The recurrence rate in our study was higher than that. Another reason for this could be that many patients followed-up after surgery at other hospitals were excluded. This might have resulted in selection bias. However, since we enrolled patients from 2001, a long-term follow-up that seemed to be sufficient for analysis of prognosis was obtained for each patient. Fourthly, the number of ccRCCs of Fuhrman grade 3 or more and venous invasion was small. This may also be due to our including patients with pT1 stage ccRCC only. Although the number of patients (88 cases) in our study was relatively large, different results might be obtained with a larger patient cohort.

In conclusion, tumor enhancement in the nephrographic phase was found to be a predictive factor for recurrence after nephrectomy in patients with localized stage T1 ccRCC. The application of dynamic CT before surgery may be useful, not only for the diagnosis of a renal tumor, but also to predict its recurrence after surgery.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Professor Yoshinao Oda, Department of Anatomic Pathology, Kyushu University, for providing the pathological information and Professor Masatoshi Eto, Department of Urology, Kyushu University, for providing the clinical information.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in regard to this study. No grant or fund supported this work.

  • Received January 12, 2018.
  • Revision received February 12, 2018.
  • Accepted February 13, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Motzer RJ,
    2. Bander NH,
    3. Nanus DM
    : Renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 335: 865-875, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Eble JN,
    2. Sauter G,
    3. Epstein JI
    : World Health Organization. Classification of tumours. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the urinary system and male genital organs. Lyon, IARC Press, 2004.
  3. ↵
    1. Kim JK,
    2. Kim TK,
    3. Ahn HJ,
    4. Kim CS,
    5. Kim KR,
    6. Cho KS
    : Differentiation of subtypes of renal cell carcinoma on helical CT scans. Am J Roentgenol 178: 1499-1506, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Jinzaki M,
    2. Tanimoto A,
    3. Mukai M,
    4. Ikeda E,
    5. Kobayashi S,
    6. Yuasa Y,
    7. Narimatsu Y,
    8. Murai M
    : Double-phase helical CT of small renal parenchymal neoplasms: correlation with pathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24: 835-842, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sauk SC,
    2. Hsu MS,
    3. Margolis DJA,
    4. Lu DS,
    5. Rao NP,
    6. Belldegrun AS,
    7. Pantuck AJ,
    8. Raman SS
    : Clear cell renal cell carcinoma: multiphasic multidetector CT imaging features help predict genetic karyotypes. Radiology 261: 854-862, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Saroufim A,
    2. Messai Y,
    3. Hasmim M,
    4. Rioux N,
    5. Lacovelli R,
    6. Verhoest G,
    7. Bensalah K,
    8. Patard JJ,
    9. Albiges L,
    10. Azzarone B,
    11. Escudier B,
    12. Chouaib S
    : Tumoral CD105 is a novel independent prognostic marker for prognosis in clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 110: 1778-1784, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Delahunt B,
    2. Bethwaite PB,
    3. Thornton A
    : Prognostic significance of microscopic vascularity for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Br J Urol 80: 401-404, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Qi L,
    2. Du J,
    3. Zhang Z,
    4. Diao L,
    5. Chen X,
    6. Yao X
    : Low differentiated microvascular density and low expression of platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) predict distant metastasis and poor prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 112: E415-423, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Pichler M,
    2. Hutterer GC,
    3. Chromecki TF,
    4. Jesche J,
    5. Kampel-Kettner K,
    6. Rehak P,
    7. Pummer K,
    8. Zigeuner R
    : Histologic tumor necrosis is an independent prognostic indicator for clear cell and papillary renal cell carcinoma. Am J Clin Pathol 137: 283-289, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Iakovlev VV,
    2. Gabril M,
    3. Dubinski W,
    4. Scorilas A,
    5. Youssef YM,
    6. Faragalla H,
    7. Kovacs K,
    8. Rotondo F,
    9. Metias S,
    10. Arsanious A,
    11. Plotkin A,
    12. Girgis AH,
    13. Streutker CJ,
    14. Yousef GM
    : Microvascular density as an independent predictor of clinical outcome in renal cell carcinoma: an automated image analysis study. Lab Invest 92: 46-56, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ha YS,
    2. Park YH,
    3. Kang SH,
    4. Hong SH,
    5. Hwang TK,
    6. Byun SS,
    7. Kim YJ
    : Predictive factors for late recurrence in patients with stage T1 clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multiinstitutional study. Clin Genitourin Cancer 11: 51-55, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Delahunt B,
    2. Kittelson JM,
    3. McCredie MRE
    : Prognostic importance of tumor size for localized conventional (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma. Cancer 94: 658-664, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Lau WK,
    2. Cheville JC,
    3. Blute ML,
    4. Weaver AL,
    5. Zinche H
    : Prognostic features of pathologic stage T1 renal cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy. Urology 59: 532-537, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Veeratterapillay R,
    2. Ijabla R,
    3. Conaway D,
    4. Haslam P,
    5. Soomro N,
    6. Heer R
    : Contrast-enhanced CT in 100 clear cell renal cell cancers: an analysis of enhancement, tumour size, and survival. Clinical Radiology 70: 1357-1361, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nishie A,
    2. Kakihara D,
    3. Asayama Y,
    4. Ishigami K,
    5. Ushijima Y,
    6. Takayama Y,
    7. Okamoto D,
    8. Fujita N,
    9. Morita K,
    10. Kubo Y,
    11. Inokuchi J,
    12. Honda H
    : Apparent diffusion coefficient: An associative factor for recurrence after nephrectomy in localized renal cell carcinoma. J Magn Reson Imaging 43: 166-172, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nisman B,
    2. Appelbaum L,
    3. Yutkin V,
    4. Nechushtan H,
    5. Hubert A,
    6. Uziely B,
    7. Pode D,
    8. Peretz T
    : Serum thymidine kinase 1 activity following nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma and radiofrequency ablation of metastases to lung and liver. Anticancer Res 36: 1791-1797, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Kadono Y,
    2. Kawaguchi S,
    3. Nohara T,
    4. Shigehara K,
    5. Narimoto K,
    6. Izumi K,
    7. Ikeda H,
    8. Yaegashi H,
    9. Miyagi T,
    10. Nakashima T,
    11. Seto C,
    12. Mizokami A
    : Evaluation of factors affecting metastasis for renal cell carcinoma based on current guidelines in Japan. Anticancer Res 37: 5147-5153, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Bier S,
    2. Aufderklamm S,
    3. Todenhöfer T,
    4. Kruck S,
    5. Schuster K,
    6. Rausch S,
    7. Othman A,
    8. Notohamiprodjo M,
    9. Nikolaou K,
    10. Schwentner C,
    11. Stenzl A,
    12. Bier G,
    13. Bedke J
    : Prediction of postoperative risks in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using RENAL, Mayo Adhesive Probability and renal pelvic score. Anticancer Res 37: 1369-1373, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Yoshimitsu K,
    2. Irie H,
    3. Tajima T,
    4. Nishie A,
    5. Asayama Y,
    6. Hirakawa M,
    7. Nakayama T,
    8. Kakihara D,
    9. Honda H
    : MR imaging of renal cell carcinoma: its role in determining cell type. Radiat Med 22: 371-376, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    1. Nishie A,
    2. Asayama Y,
    3. Ishigami K,
    4. Kakihara D,
    5. Nakayama T,
    6. Ushijima Y,
    7. Takayama Y,
    8. Yokomizo A,
    9. Tatsugami K,
    10. Inokuchi J,
    11. Fujita N,
    12. Kubo Y,
    13. Aishima S,
    14. Hirakawa M,
    15. Honda H
    : Pathological manifestation of difference in washout pattern of adrenal hyperplasia on dynamic CT. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 58: 559-564, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Sun J,
    3. Xing W,
    4. Ding J,
    5. Chen T,
    6. Dai Y,
    7. Sun J,
    8. Hu J
    : Prediction of nuclear grade of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with MRI: intratumoral susceptibility signal intensity versus necrosis. Acta Radiol 55: 378-384, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Zigeuner R,
    2. Hutterer G,
    3. Chromecki T,
    4. Imamovic A,
    5. Kampel-Kettner K,
    6. Rehak P,
    7. Langner C,
    8. Pummer K
    : External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade, and necrosis (SSIGN) score for clear-cell renal cell carcinoma in a single European centre applying routine pathology. Eur Urol 57: 102-109, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Jorns J,
    2. Thiel DD,
    3. Lohse C,
    4. Lohse CM,
    5. Williams A,
    6. Arnold ML,
    7. Cheville JC,
    8. Leibovich BC,
    9. Parker AS
    : Three-dimensional tumour volume and cancer-specific survival for patients undergoing nephrectomy to treat pT1 clear-cell renal cell carcinoma. BJU Int 110: 956-960, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sakai I,
    2. Miyake H,
    3. Muramaki M,
    4. Kondo Y,
    5. Kusuda Y,
    6. Yamada Y,
    7. Fujisawa M
    : Significant impact of age at diagnosis on the prognosis of Japanese patients with pT1 renal cell carcinoma following surgical resection. BJU Int 109: 695-699, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Muramaki M,
    2. Miyake H,
    3. Sakai I,
    4. Kondo Y,
    5. Kusuda Y,
    6. Yamada Y,
    7. Fujisawa M
    : Age at diagnosis as a powerful predictor for disease recurrence after radical nephrectomy in Japanese patients with pT1 renal cell carcinoma. Int J Urol 11: 121-125, 2011.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 38 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 4
April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor Enhancement on Dynamic CT: A Predictive Factor for Recurrence After Nephrectomy in Localized T1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Tumor Enhancement on Dynamic CT: A Predictive Factor for Recurrence After Nephrectomy in Localized T1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
JUNKI MAEHARA, AKIHIRO NISHIE, YOSHIKI ASAYAMA, KOUSEI ISHIGAMI, YASUHIRO USHIJIMA, YUKIHISA TAKAYAMA, DAISUKE OKAMOTO, NOBUHIRO FUJITA, MASAAKI SUGIMOTO, JUNICHI INOKUCHI, HIROSHI HONDA
Anticancer Research Apr 2018, 38 (4) 2377-2383;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Tumor Enhancement on Dynamic CT: A Predictive Factor for Recurrence After Nephrectomy in Localized T1 Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
JUNKI MAEHARA, AKIHIRO NISHIE, YOSHIKI ASAYAMA, KOUSEI ISHIGAMI, YASUHIRO USHIJIMA, YUKIHISA TAKAYAMA, DAISUKE OKAMOTO, NOBUHIRO FUJITA, MASAAKI SUGIMOTO, JUNICHI INOKUCHI, HIROSHI HONDA
Anticancer Research Apr 2018, 38 (4) 2377-2383;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Comparison of BRCA2 Single Nucleotide Variants Between Japanese Patients With Familial Prostate Cancer, Sporadic Prostate Cancer, and Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
  • Corrigendum
  • Sex-related Survival Differences in Patients With Glioblastoma – Results From a Retrospective Analysis
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • RCC
  • clear cell
  • CT
  • recurrence
  • tumor enhancement
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire