Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

The Role of MTHFR Genotype in Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan

KUEI-MAN LIN, MEI-DUE YANG, CHIA-WEN TSAI, WEN-SHIN CHANG, CHIEH-LUN HSIAO, LONG-BIN JENG, TE-CHENG YUEH, MENG-CHIH LEE and DA-TIAN BAU
Anticancer Research April 2018, 38 (4) 2001-2006;
KUEI-MAN LIN
1Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
2Department of Nursing, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MEI-DUE YANG
3Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, Translational Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIA-WEN TSAI
3Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, Translational Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WEN-SHIN CHANG
3Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, Translational Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHIEH-LUN HSIAO
3Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, Translational Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LONG-BIN JENG
3Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, Translational Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TE-CHENG YUEH
4Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
5National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MENG-CHIH LEE
1Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
6Department of Family Medicine, Taichung Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
7Institute of Population Health Sciences, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DA-TIAN BAU
3Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory, Translational Medical Research Center, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
8Department of Bioinformatics and Medical Engineering, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan, R.O.C.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: datian@mail.cmuh.org.tw artbau2@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the contribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype to the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: In this hospital-based case–control study, the role of MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131) genotypes in determining CRC risk were investigated among 362 patients with CRC and an equal number of age- and gender-matched healthy individuals. Results: The percentages of CC, CT and TT genotypes for MTHFR rs1801133 were 64.1%, 29.8% and 6.1% in the CRC group and 51.1%, 37.0% and 11.9% in the control group, respectively (p for trend=0.0006). Analysis of the allelic frequency distribution showed that the variant T allele of MTHFR rs1801133 conferred a lower CRC susceptibility than did the wild-type C allele (odds ratio(OR)=0.66, 95% confidence interval(CI)=0.52-0.84, p=4.32×10−5). For the gene–lifestyle interaction, there were obvious protective effects of MTHFR rs1801133 T allele on the risk of CRC among non-smokers, ever smokers and non-alcohol drinkers, but not drinkers. Conclusion: MTHFR rs1801133 T allele serves as a predictive marker for CRC risk and future studies with larger samples and functional evaluation are warranted to validate the current findings.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • genotype
  • MTHFR
  • polymorphism
  • Taiwan

Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality are both third among cancer patients worldwide global and are expected to increase by 60% to more than 2.2 million new cases and 1.1 million deaths by 2030 (1, 2). For many years, the incidence and mortality of CRC has occupied the first and third ranks among the most common types of cancer in Taiwan (3, 4). Etiological studies have attributed more than 85% of CRC risk to lifestyle and environmental factors, particularly meat consumption, cigarette smoking, and exposure to carcinogenic aromatic amines (5, 6). From the viewpoint of epidemiology, about 15-20% of CRC cases have a strong familial history of cancer that have led epidemiologists to seek additional inherited susceptibility factors (7-9). In Taiwan, although specific biomarkers for CRC prediction and detection have been reported in the past decade (4, 10), novel genomic markers of CRC and the interactions among the genomic, lifestyle and environmental risk factors are still of high interest and largely unrevealed.

The protein methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) is an enzyme in charge of the conversion of 5,10-methylene-tetrahydrofolate into 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, homocysteine re-methylation, and neosynthesis of DNA and RNA (11). The multi-aspect regulatory effects of MTHFR on DNA methylation, DNA replication, DNA repair and cell division make it a potential cancer-predisposing gene. It is reasonable that rapidly proliferating malignancies have a higher requirement for DNA neosynthesis and cell division and could be more susceptible to folate deficiency, resulting in an instable genome with more DNA damage. In a BALB/c mouse model, low dietary folate and MTHFR deficiency induced the formation of intestinal tumors (12).

The most subtle genetic variations are single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) which determine personal susceptibility to human diseases, such as cancer. In literature, population-based investigations of MTHFR variations have focused on examining the genotypes of two SNPs of a catalytic domain, C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131), which may determine the enzymatic activity of encoded MTHFR (13, 14). In the case of the MTHFR C677T polymorphism, the cytosine base at position 677 changes to a thymidine base, which in turn affects the amino acid at position 222, as it is changed from alanine to valine. The resultant MTHFR enzyme from the TT variant becomes thermolabile, resulting in decreased activity with elevated temperature (15). The modified protein loses its flavin adenine dinucleotide cofactor more quickly and has a lower stability than the enzyme encoded by CC. The thermolabile effect on TT-encoded MTHFR can be suppressed by the addition of folate, which causes a higher affinity for flavin adenine dinucleotide and an increase in MTHFR stability (15). The second polymorphism, MTHFR A1298C, is located in the coding regulatory domain (16). It was reported that enzyme activity of heterozygotes and rare homozygotes of MTHFR C677T variant was only 60% and 30%, respectively, of the wild-type (14); for MTHFR A1298C, the rare homozygotes have 60% of wild-type activity (14). In 2004, it was reported that colon and breast cancer cells with MTHFR 677T variant had lower MTHFR activity than those with MTHFR 677C (17). In addition, mutant MTHFR 677T increased the sensitivity of cancer cells to the cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (17). In null mouse experiments, the expression of MTHFR 677T enhanced the growth rates of xenografts compared to those expressing wild-type MTHFR 677C. Furthermore, consistent with the evidence from cell models, the 677T xenografts were also more sensitive to 5-FU treatment than those of 677C in a mouse model (17). Many studies investigating MTHFR genetic variants have found positive associations with various types of cancer, such as of breast (18, 19), oral (20, 21), lung (22) and prostate (23) cancer and leukemia (24).

In this study, we analyzed the genetic polymorphisms of both MTHFR C677T and A1298C using representative CRC samples (control/case=362/362) in order to examine the association between MTHFR genotypes and CRC in a Taiwanese population, and summarize the relevant and updated literature about CRC and MTHFR genotypes.

Materials and Methods

Investigated population. The investigated population included 724 individuals (362 patients with CRC and 362 controls). Patients diagnosed with CRC were recruited at the outpatient clinics of general surgery at the China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan by the team of Drs. LB Jeng and MD Yang. The clinical characteristics of patients, including histological details, were all graded and defined by expert surgeons as previous published (4, 10). All participants completed a self-administered questionnaire and provided a 5-ml sample of peripheral blood for genotyping. An equal number of non-cancer healthy volunteers (n=362) were selected as controls by matching for age, gender and some indulgences after initial random sampling from the Health Examination Cohort of the Hospital with the help of colleagues in the Department of Family Medicine. The exclusion criteria for the control group included previous malignancy, metastasized cancer from other or unknown origin and any familial or genetic diseases. This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the China Medical University Hospital (IRB project identification coding number: DMR99-IRB-108) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants with the help of Tissue Bank of China Medical University Hospital. Selected patient characteristics extracted from personal questionnaires is summarized in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Summary of basic and clinical data of the 362 patients with colorectal cancer and 362 matched non-cancer healthy controls.

Genotyping conditions. The genomic DNA from peripheral blood leucocytes of each recruited subject was prepared with the QIAamp Blood Mini Kit (Blossom, Taipei, Taiwan) and stored at −80°C until processed as per our recent publications (25-28). The methodology for MTHFR C677T (rs1801133) and A1298C (rs1801131) genotyping, including the designing of the specific primers and the selection of restriction enzymes, were performed at the Terry Fox Cancer Research Laboratory. Briefly, the sequences for forward and reverse primer pairs for MTHFR C677T were: forward 5’-TGA AGG AGA AGG TGT CTG CGG GA-3’ and reverse 5’-AGG ACG GTG CGG TGA GAG TG-3’. The primers for MTHFR A1298C were: forward 5’-GGG AGG AGC TGA CCA GTG CAG-3’ and reverse 5’-GGG GTC AGG CCA GGG GCA G-3’. The following cycling conditions were performed: 5 min of initial denaturation at 95°C, 35 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at 95°C, 30 s of annealing at 54°C and 1 min of elongation at 72°C, and 7 min of final extension at 72°C. The 198-bp polymerase chain reaction (PCR) product of MTHFR C677T and 138-bp PCR product of MTHFR A1298C were subject to enzyme digestion with Hinf I and Fnu4H I (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA, USA), respectively for 4 h and then visualized by ethidium bromide-stained 3% agarose gel electrophoresis under UV light. On digestion with Hinf I, the PCR product of MTHFR C677T arising from the C allele was uncut (198 bp), whereas the T allele was cut into fragments of 175 bp and 23 bp. On digestion with Fnu4H I, the PCR product of MTHFR A1298C arising from the A allele was uncut (138 bp), whereas the C allele was cut into fragments of 119 bp and 19 bp. All the genotypic processing was repeated by two researchers independently and blindly; all the genotyping results were 100% concordant.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Distribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotypes among the 362 patients with colorectal cancer and 362 matched healthy controls.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Distribution of allelic frequencies for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) among the 362 patients with colorectal cancer and 362 matched healthy controls.

Statistical analyses. Student's t-test was applied for the comparison of ages between the CRC case and the control groups. Pearson's chi-square test was applied to compare the distribution of the MTHFR genotypes among the subgroups. The associations between the MTHFR genotypes and CRC risk were estimated by computing odds ratios (ORs) and related 95% confidence intervals (CIs) from logistic regression analysis. Statistically, any difference at p<0.05 was taken as being significant between the two groups compared.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Odds ratios for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T rs1801133 genotype and colorectal cancer risk after stratification by smoking status.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Odds ratios for methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) rs1801133 genotype and risk of colorectal cancer risk after stratification by alcohol drinking status.

Results

The frequency distribution of selected basic characters, including age, gender, smoking and alcohol drinking statuses for the 362 patients with CRC in the case group and 362 non-cancer healthy participants of the control group are summarized and compared in Table I. In addition, clinical characters include tumor size, location, and lymph node metastasis status of the patients are also summarized in Table I. Since we applied frequency matching to recruit non-cancer healthy individuals as controls, there was no difference in the distribution of age or gender between the control and case groups (p=0.8654 and 0.6525, respectively) (Table I). There was no difference in the distribution of smoking or drinking subpopulations between the control and case groups (p=0.6525 and 0.4410, respectively). There were 195 and 167 patients with tumor size <5 cm and ≥5 cm, respectively. Tumor was located in the colon in 257 patients and in the rectum in 105. There were 152 patients with and 210 without lymph node metastasis (Table I).

The distribution of MTHFR C677T and A1298C genotypes among the 326 non-cancer controls and the 326 patients with CRC are presented and statistically analyzed in Table II. The results showed that the genotypes of MTHFR C677T were significantly differently distributed between case and control groups (p for trend=0.0006) (Table II). In detail, the MTHFR C677T the heterozygous CT and homozygous TT were associated with lower CRC risk than the wild-type CC genotype (p=0.0064 and 0.0011, respectively; Table II). In the recessive model, there was a significant association between the TT genotype of MTHFR C677T and CRC risk, compared with CC+CT genotypes (p=0.0063; Table II). In the dominant model, there was also a significant association between the CC genotype of MTHFR C677T and CRC risk, compared with CT+TT genotypes (p=0.0003; Table II). The genotypes of MTHFR A1298C were not differentially distributed between case and control groups in any model (Table II).

To confirm the results shown in Table II, analysis of allelic frequency distribution for the MTHFR C677T and A1298C SNPs was further conducted and the results are presented in Table III. Supporting the findings that genotype of MTHFR C677T was associated with CRC risk, the variant allele T was found at a frequency of 21.0% in the patient group, significantly lower than that of 30.4% in the non-cancer healthy control group (p=4.32×10−5, Table III). On the contrary, there was no significant difference in the allelic frequencies of MTHFR A1298C between the case and control groups (Table III).

Since smoking and alcohol drinking habits are well-known risk factors for CRC in Taiwan, we were interested in investigating the interactions between the novel genetic marker of MTHFR C677T and personal cigarette smoking and alcohol drinking habits. Among non-smokers, those with TT genotype at MTHFR C677T were at 0.49-fold odds of having CRC (p=0.0201), conferring a protective effect, compared with those with CC genotype (Table IV). After adjusting for age, gender and alcohol drinking status, statistical significance still existed at a similar level (p=0.0112; Table IV). The protective effects are very similar to those with CT and TT at MTHFR C677T among smokers (Table IV). On the other hand, among non-drinkers, those with CT and TT genotypes at MTHFR C677T were at 0.69 and 0.43-fold odds of having CRC (p=0.0317 and 0.0042, respectively), conferring a protective effect, while this was not the case for ever drinkers (Table V). After adjusting for age, gender and smoking status, results were equally significant (Table V).

Discussion

In literature, the genotypes of MTHFR may be associated with prognosis of chemotherapy in patients with CRC (29). Similar to the report of Robien and colleagues mentioned in the introduction, people carrying the common T variant of MTHFR genotypes have reduced MTHFR enzyme activity, ~50% that of normal, with subsequently increased plasma homocysteine concentrations (30). The first study to evaluate the association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and CRC was performed by Chen and colleagues, reporting that the MTHFR C677T variant affected enzyme activity and was involved in abnormal methylation as well as influencing DNA synthesis, leading to colorectal tumorigenesis (31). In 2001, Junker et al. also reported that the MTHFR enzyme activity with the TT and CT genotypes were 30% and 65% of that associated with the CC genotype (32). In the present study, the relative percentages of MTHFR C677T taints were all significantly lower in patients with CRC compared with those who were healthy controls; however, such a difference in genotypic distribution was not observed for MTHFR A1298C (Table II). In addition, a lower percentage of individuals bearing the T allele at MTHFR C677T was observed in patient group than that in control group (Table III). Furthermore, the genotypes of MTHFR C677T may conduct its protective influence for both smokers and non-smokers, and those non-drinkers (Table V).

Despite our efforts to conduct accurate and comprehensive genotyping and related analysis, there are some limitations that should be noted. Firstly, the lack of recorded follow-up limited the analysis of the correlation of prognostic indices, such as survival rates. From the viewpoint of prognosis, Wu and colleagues found that TT-homozygosity at MTHFR C677T was significantly associated with higher survival rates for patients with CRC (29, 33). Secondly, lack of collection of both tumor and non-tumor samples limited the study of differential expression of MTHFR mRNA and protein levels among the participants, in addition to the inter-individual difference of the patients with CRC. Further molecular investigations of the genotype–phenotype correlation may help in understanding the contribution of MTHFR C677T genotype not only to overall cell proliferation, DNA neo-synthesis and DNA repair capacity, but also regarding personal susceptibility to CRC and other types of cancer. From the viewpoint of folate metabolism, the serum monitoring of folate levels should be taken into consideration by patient care systems since Chiang et al. reported that higher serum folate concentration was significantly correlated with increased CRC risk in individuals with adenomatous polyps, while it had no effect on CRC risk in healthy controls (34). Thirdly, the relatively small sample size, especially in subgroup analysis, such as those shown in Tables IV and V, may have caused bias and reduced the statistic power of our estimates. The strongest evidence supporting our findings comes from meta-analyses showing that MTHFR 677 homozygous mutation TT genotype was revealed to be a protective genotype for CRC with statistical significance in a pooled population (35).

In conclusion, this study provides evidence that the T allele at MTHFR C677T rs1801133 may serve as a protective factor which interacts with smoking and alcohol habits to determine personal susceptibility to CRC. At the same time, overall monitoring of alterations of cell proliferation, DNA neosynthesis, DNA repair capacity and folate metabolism for each individual according to their MTHFR genotype may help us provide a better quality care and prognosis for patients with CRC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors declare no conflict of interest in regard to this study. We appreciate Huai-Mei Hsu, Hsin-Ting Li, Shiou-Ting Yen, Su-Yi Pan, Chia-Wen Lin, Cin-Wun Wu and the Tissue Bank of China Medical University Hospital for their excellent technical assistance and all the study participants, doctors, nurses and colleagues. This study was supported mainly by the China Medical University and Hospital to Professor Bau (DMR107-107) and partially by research grants from Taiwan Ministry of Health and Welfare Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (MOHW106-TDU-B-212-113004) and Taichung Armed Forces General Hospital to Dr. Yueh (106A14).

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Received January 10, 2018.
  • Revision received February 3, 2018.
  • Accepted February 5, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Fedewa SA,
    4. Ahnen DJ,
    5. Meester RGS,
    6. Barzi A,
    7. Jemal A
    : Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin 67: 177-193, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Arnold M,
    2. Sierra MS,
    3. Laversanne M,
    4. Soerjomataram I,
    5. Jemal A,
    6. Bray F
    : Global patterns and trends in colorectal cancer incidence and mortality. Gut 66: 683-691, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Chou CL,
    2. Tseng CJ,
    3. Shiue YL
    : The impact of young age on the prognosis for colorectal cancer: a population-based study in Taiwan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 47: 1010-1018, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Yueh TC,
    2. Chou AK,
    3. Gong CL,
    4. Fu CK,
    5. Pei JS,
    6. Wu MH,
    7. Tsai CW,
    8. Chang WS,
    9. Hsiao CL,
    10. Yen ST,
    11. Li HT,
    12. Bau DT
    : The contribution of excision repair cross-complementing group 1 genotypes to colorectal cancer susceptibility in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 37: 2307-2313, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Rattray NJW,
    2. Charkoftaki G,
    3. Rattray Z,
    4. Hansen JE,
    5. Vasiliou V,
    6. Johnson CH
    : Environmental influences in the etiology of colorectal cancer: the premise of metabolomics. Curr Pharmacol Rep 3: 114-125, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Cichoz-Lach H,
    2. Szumilo J,
    3. Celinski K,
    4. Kasztelan-Szczerbinska B,
    5. Szczerbinski M,
    6. Swatek J,
    7. Wronecki L,
    8. Wargocki J,
    9. Slomka M
    : Results of screening in Lublin Province, Poland, for colorectal cancer and neoplastic polyps – the role of environmental factors. Ann Agric Environ Med 24: 108-112, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    1. Butterworth AS,
    2. Higgins JP,
    3. Pharoah P
    : Relative and absolute risk of colorectal cancer for individuals with a family history: a meta-analysis. Eur J Cancer 42: 216-227, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Houlston RS,
    2. Tomlinson IP
    : Polymorphisms and colorectal tumor risk. Gastroenterology 121: 282-301, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Rasool S,
    2. Rasool V,
    3. Naqvi T,
    4. Ganai BA,
    5. Shah BA
    : Genetic unraveling of colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol 35: 5067-5082, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Chang WS,
    2. Yueh TC,
    3. Tsai CW,
    4. Ji HX,
    5. Wu CN,
    6. Wang SC,
    7. Lai YL,
    8. Hsu SW,
    9. Hsieh MH,
    10. Hsiao CL,
    11. Hung YW,
    12. Shih TC,
    13. Bau DT
    : Contribution of DNA repair xeroderma pigmentosum group D genotypes to colorectal cancer risk in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 36: 1657-1663, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Bailey LB,
    2. Gregory JF 3rd.
    : Polymorphisms of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and other enzymes: metabolic significance, risks and impact on folate requirement. J Nutr 129: 919-922, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Knock E,
    2. Deng L,
    3. Wu Q,
    4. Leclerc D,
    5. Wang XL,
    6. Rozen R
    : Low dietary folate initiates intestinal tumors in mice, with altered expression of G2-M checkpoint regulators polo-like kinase 1 and cell division cycle 25c. Cancer Res 66: 10349-10356, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. van der Put NM,
    2. Gabreels F,
    3. Stevens EM,
    4. Smeitink JA,
    5. Trijbels FJ,
    6. Eskes TK,
    7. van den Heuvel LP,
    8. Blom HJ
    : A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: An additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am J Hum Genet 62: 1044-1051, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Robien K,
    2. Ulrich CM
    : 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphisms and leukemia risk: a HuGE minireview. Am J Epidemiol 157: 571-582, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kang SS,
    2. Zhou J,
    3. Wong PW,
    4. Kowalisyn J,
    5. Strokosch G
    : Intermediate homocysteinemia: a thermolabile variant of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Am J Hum Genet 43: 414-421, 1988.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Homberger A,
    2. Linnebank M,
    3. Winter C,
    4. Willenbring H,
    5. Marquardt T,
    6. Harms E,
    7. Koch HG
    : Genomic structure and transcript variants of the human methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene. Eur J Hum Genet 8: 725-729, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sohn KJ,
    2. Croxford R,
    3. Yates Z,
    4. Lucock M,
    5. Kim YI
    : Effect of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T polymorphism on chemosensitivity of colon and breast cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate. J Natl Cancer Inst 96: 134-144, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Yu L,
    2. Chen J
    : Association of MTHFR Ala222Val (rs1801133) polymorphism and breast cancer susceptibility: An update meta-analysis based on 51 research studies. Diagn Pathol 7: 171, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Huang CY,
    2. Chang WS,
    3. Shui HA,
    4. Hsieh YH,
    5. Loh CH,
    6. Wang HC,
    7. Ji HX,
    8. Hsiao CL,
    9. Hsu CM,
    10. Tsai CW,
    11. Bau DT
    : Evaluation of the contribution of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotypes to Taiwan breast cancer. Anticancer Res 34: 4109-4115, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Tsai CW,
    2. Hsu CF,
    3. Tsai MH,
    4. Tsou YA,
    5. Hua CH,
    6. Chang WS,
    7. Lin CC,
    8. Bau DT
    : Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) genotype, smoking habit, metastasis and oral cancer in Taiwan. Anticancer Res 31: 2395-2399, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Jia J,
    2. Ma Z,
    3. Wu S
    : Positive association between MTHFR C677T polymorphism and oral cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol 35: 4943-4948, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Liu ZB,
    2. Wang LP,
    3. Shu J,
    4. Jin C,
    5. Lou ZX
    : Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype might be associated with an increased lung cancer risk in Asians. Gene 515: 214-219, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Wu HC,
    2. Chang CH,
    3. Tsai RY,
    4. Lin CH,
    5. Wang RF,
    6. Tsai CW,
    7. Chen KB,
    8. Yao CH,
    9. Chiu CF,
    10. Bau DT,
    11. Lin CC
    : Significant association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase single nucleotide polymorphisms with prostate cancer susceptibility in taiwan. Anticancer Res 30: 3573-3577, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Pei JS,
    2. Hsu CM,
    3. Tsai CW,
    4. Chang WS,
    5. Ji HX,
    6. Hsiao CL,
    7. Miao CE,
    8. Hsu YN,
    9. Bau DT
    : The association of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase genotypes with the risk of childhood leukemia in Taiwan. PLoS One 10: e0119776, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hu PS,
    2. Chang WS,
    3. Chou AK,
    4. Hsia NY,
    5. Hung YW,
    6. Lin CW,
    7. Wu CW,
    8. Huang CY,
    9. Wu MF,
    10. Liao CH,
    11. Tsai CW,
    12. Bau DT,
    13. Gong CL
    : The association of MMP-8 genotypes with pterygium. In Vivo 32: 41-46, 2018.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pei JS,
    2. Chang WS,
    3. Hsu PC,
    4. Hung YW,
    5. Cheng SP,
    6. Tsai CW,
    7. Bau DT,
    8. Gong CL
    : The contribution of MMP-8 promoter genotypes to childhood leukemia. In Vivo 31: 1059-1064, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Liao CH,
    2. Chang WS,
    3. Hu PS,
    4. Wu HC,
    5. Hsu SW,
    6. Liu YF,
    7. Liu SP,
    8. Hung HS,
    9. Bau DT,
    10. Tsai CW
    : The contribution of MMP-7 promoter polymorphisms in renal cell carcinoma. In Vivo 31: 631-635, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Hung YW,
    2. Tsai CW,
    3. Wu CN,
    4. Shih LC,
    5. Chen YY,
    6. Liu YF,
    7. Hung HS,
    8. Shen MY,
    9. Chang WS,
    10. Bau DT
    : The contribution of matrix metalloproteinase-8 promoter polymorphism to oral cancer susceptibility. In Vivo 31: 585-590, 2017.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Wu NC,
    2. Su SM,
    3. Lin TJ,
    4. Chin J,
    5. Hou CF,
    6. Yang JY,
    7. Liu WS,
    8. Chang LC
    : Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase C677T and A1298C polymorphisms and fluorouracil-based treatment in Taiwan colorectal cancer. Anticancer Drugs 26: 888-893, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  27. ↵
    1. Jacques PF,
    2. Bostom AG,
    3. Williams RR,
    4. Ellison RC,
    5. Eckfeldt JH,
    6. Rosenberg IH,
    7. Selhub J,
    8. Rozen R
    : Relation between folate status, a common mutation in methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase, and plasma homocysteine concentrations. Circulation 93: 7-9, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Chen J,
    2. Giovannucci E,
    3. Kelsey K,
    4. Rimm EB,
    5. Stampfer MJ,
    6. Colditz GA,
    7. Spiegelman D,
    8. Willett WC,
    9. Hunter DJ
    : A methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase polymorphism and the risk of colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 56: 4862-4864, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Junker R,
    2. Kotthoff S,
    3. Vielhaber H,
    4. Halimeh S,
    5. Kosch A,
    6. Koch HG,
    7. Kassenbohmer R,
    8. Heineking B,
    9. Nowak-Gottl U
    : Infant methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase 677TT genotype is a risk factor for congenital heart disease. Cardiovasc Res 51: 251-254, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Yeh CC,
    2. Lai CY,
    3. Chang SN,
    4. Hsieh LL,
    5. Tang R,
    6. Sung FC,
    7. Lin YK
    : Polymorphisms of MTHFR C677T and A1298C associated with survival in patients with colorectal cancer treated with 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 22: 484-493, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Chiang FF,
    2. Huang SC,
    3. Wang HM,
    4. Chen FP,
    5. Huang YC
    : High serum folate might have a potential dual effect on risk of colorectal cancer. Clin Nutr 34: 986-990, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Shiao SP,
    2. Yu CH
    : Meta-prediction of MTHFR gene polymorphism mutations and associated risk for colorectal cancer. Biol Res Nurs 18: 357-369, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 38 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 4
April 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Role of MTHFR Genotype in Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
18 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
The Role of MTHFR Genotype in Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan
KUEI-MAN LIN, MEI-DUE YANG, CHIA-WEN TSAI, WEN-SHIN CHANG, CHIEH-LUN HSIAO, LONG-BIN JENG, TE-CHENG YUEH, MENG-CHIH LEE, DA-TIAN BAU
Anticancer Research Apr 2018, 38 (4) 2001-2006;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
The Role of MTHFR Genotype in Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan
KUEI-MAN LIN, MEI-DUE YANG, CHIA-WEN TSAI, WEN-SHIN CHANG, CHIEH-LUN HSIAO, LONG-BIN JENG, TE-CHENG YUEH, MENG-CHIH LEE, DA-TIAN BAU
Anticancer Research Apr 2018, 38 (4) 2001-2006;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Association of C677T and A1298C MTHFR Polymorphisms and Fluoropyrimidine-induced Toxicity in Mestizo Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
  • Association of Adiponectin Genotypes With Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility in Taiwan
  • Significant Association Between the MiR146a Genotypes and Susceptibility to Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Taiwan
  • Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 rs3918242 Promoter Genotypes With Colorectal Cancer Risk
  • Association of Caspase-8 Genotypes With Bladder Cancer Risk
  • Association of Caspase-8 Genotypes With Oral Cancer Risk in Taiwan
  • Contribution of Caspase-8 Genotypes to Colorectal Cancer Risk in Taiwan
  • Genetic Analysis Using a Gene Panel in 87 Caucasian Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Own Results and Review of Literature
  • Contribution of Murine Double Minute 2 Genotypes to Colorectal Cancer Risk in Taiwan
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • PTPN3 Could Βe a Therapeutic Target of Pancreatic Cancer
  • Murine Double Minute 2 Antagonist Nutlin-3 Enhanced Chemosensitivity in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Potent Imidazothiazole-based Inhibitor of BRAF V600E Overcomes Acquired Resistance via Inhibition of RAF Dimerization in PLX4032-resistant Melanoma
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Colorectal cancer
  • genotype
  • MTHFR
  • polymorphism
  • Taiwan
Anticancer Research

© 2022 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire