Abstract
We previously reported that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)/neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2/TRKB) signaling contributes to induction of malignant phenotype of gallbladder cancer (GBC). Recently, pan-TRK inhibitors have been evaluated and their dramatic clinical activity is being shown for a variety of cancer types harboring an NTRK rearrangement in phase I trials. ONO-7579 is an oral pan-TRK inhibitor currently under investigation in phase I/II clinical trial for TRK-rearranged solid tumors. In this study, we evaluated the anticancer effect of ONO-7579 using GBC cells with or without KRAS mutant, NOZ, TYGBK-1. Our study showed that ONO-7579 had a suppressive effect on GBC proliferation in TYGBK-1, and on invasive potential and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in TYGBK-1 and NOZ. Our data indicated that ONO-7579 could be a promising treatment option for patients with GBC.
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a fatal disease with poor prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the only potentially curative treatment; however, most GBC cases have developed into locally advanced disease or have metastasized by the time of diagnosis. In inoperable cases, many patients must rely on chemotherapy and radiation therapy, which are not sufficiently effective, and for which the available regimens are still limited. The 5-year survival of patients with stage 0, I and II GBC was reported to be 80%, 50% and 28%, respectively (1). However, survival rates were found to be markedly decrease in patients diagnosed with stage III and IV GBC (<10%) (2). Therefore, development of novel molecular therapeutic targets is strongly required for improving outcomes for patients with GBC.
Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and its tyrosine kinase receptor neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2/TRKB) have been shown to contribute to aggressive phenotype in a wide range of cancer types, including of the head and neck (3), lung (4), ovary (5), pancreas (6), and colon (7). Our previous study demonstrated its contribution to the malignant phenotype of GBC (8). In this study, we evaluated whether specifically targeting TRK would suppress the malignant phenotype of GBC in vitro.
TRK gene fusion was recently recognized as oncogenic in various solid cancer types, including sarcoma (9), non-small cell lung cancer (10), and colorectal cancer (11). Furthermore, pan-TRK inhibitors have been evaluated and dramatic clinical activity is being shown for a variety of cancers harboring an NTRK rearrangement in phase 1 trials (12). ONO-7579 is oral pan-TRK inhibitor and currently under investigation in phase I/II clinical trial for solid tumors. It is expected to inhibit phosphorylation of all TRKs with a highly efficacy and selectivity. Our previous studies demonstrated BDNF/TRKB signaling contributes to the malignant phenotype of GBC (8). Therefore, we believe the potential efficacy of TRK inhibitor would be good news for patients with GBC, for which available approaches are still limited.
In the present study, we examined the effect of ONO-7579 on GBC malignancy in vitro and demonstrated its ability to inhibit BDNF/TRKB-induced proliferation, invasiveness and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) expression.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines. We used two GBC cell lines for their evident KRAS status: NOZ (13) and TYGBK-1 (14). NOZ and TYGBK-1 were purchased from the Japanese Collection of Research Bioresources bank (Tokyo, Japan). Both cell lines were cultured according to the supplier's specifications. There was no mycoplasma contamination in either of the cell lines with mycoplasma detection kit (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Cells were cultured in 5% CO2 and 95% air, and for hypoxic conditions, cells were cultured in 1% O2, 5% CO2, and 94% N2, in a multigas incubator (Sanyo, Tokyo, Japan).
Cell proliferation assay. GBC cell lines were seeded onto 96-well plates at 5000 cells/well and incubated with TRK inhibitor ONO-7579 (gifted by Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan) at 0, 100, 500, 1000, 2000, or 3000 nM, protein kinase B (AKT) inhibitor MK2206 (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) at 0, 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 or 1 nM, or mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitor PD325901 (Cayman Chemical,) at 0, 0.1, 1, 10, 100, or 1,000 nM for 72 h. Cell proliferation was assessed by Biotrak visible plate reader (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway NJ, USA) at 492 nm (reference wavelength 620 nm) using Cell Count Reagent SF (Nacalai Tesque, Kyoto, Japan).
Cell invasion assay. The invasiveness of the GBC cell lines was assessed by Matrigel invasion assay as described previously (15). Briefly, cells (2×105) were placed in falcon tissue culture inserts (8 μm pores; Becton Dickinson, Lincoln Park, NJ) with ONO-7579 at 0, 100, 500, 1,000, 2,000, or 3,000 nM and subsequently incubated for 18 h. The cells that migrated to the lower side of the filter were fixed and stained with Diff-Quik reagent (Sysmex, Kobe, Japan) and then counted under a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse TE 300; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).
Western blot analysis. Western blotting was performed as described previously (15). Cells were prepared for protein extraction after 24-h incubation with BDNF (Peprotech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), ONO-7579, PD325901, or MK2206 alone or in combination. The protein-carrying membranes were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies for TRKB (sc-8316, 1:200), E-cadherin (sc-7870, 1:200), vimentin (sc-6260, 1:200), SLUG (sc-15391, 1:200), SNAIL (sc-10433, 1:200), TWIST (sc-15393,1:200), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) (sc-8711, 1:100), VEGF (sc-152,1:100), VEGFC (sc-7133,1:200), MEK1/2 (sc-436, 1:200), phospho-MEK1/2 (sc-7995, 1:200), AKT1/2/3 (sc-8312, 1:200), or phospho-AKT1/2/3 (sc-101629, 1:200), from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA, USA); phospho-extracellular signal-regulated kinase (p-ERK1/2) (no. 9101,1:200) from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA, USA); or p-TRKB (ab197072, 1:500) from Abcam (Cambridge, MA, USA). Peroxidase-linked secondary antibodies (Amersham Biosciences) were subsequently added and the membranes were further incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Antibody for α-tubulin (1:1,000; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used as quantitative control protein.
Immunohistochemistry. Tissue samples were obtained from patients with GBC who underwent resection at the Department of Surgery and Oncology, Kyushu University Hospitals, Fukuoka, Japan between 2001 and 2012. Approval for the use of tissues was obtained from patients in accordance with the Ethical Committees for Clinical Study at Kyushu University (approval number: 29-134). Immunohistochemical staining was performed using 4-μm-thick formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections and primary antibody for TRKB (sc-8316, 1:50; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked for 30 minutes using methanol containing 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase. Sections were incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C, followed by incubation for 40 minutes with the secondary antibody at room temperature. The reaction products were visualized using diaminobenzidine (DAB). All slides were examined by microscopy (Carl Zeiss, Tokyo, Japan).
Statistical analysis. All data are represented as mean±standard deviation (SD). Student's t-test was used for comparison of mean values between two groups. A value of p<0.05 was considered significant.
Results
Effect of ONO-7579 on the TRKB expression in GBC cell lines. TRKB expression was detected in resected human GBC specimens (Figure 1A) and GBC cell lines TYGBK-1 and NOZ (Figure 1B). Addition of BDNF significantly increased TRKB phosphorylation in GBC cells and the effects were abrogated by ONO-7579. TYGBK-1 is known to have wild-type KRAS and NOZ has KRAS mutation. As expected, addition of rhBDNF induced MEK phosphorylation, and ONO-7579 treatment abrogated this effect in TYGBK-1 cells, whereas in NOZ cells, MEK phosphorylation status was unchanged by BDNF or ONO-7579 treatment (Figure 1C). On the basis of this result, we used these cell lines to assess the effect of ONO-7579 on GBC malignancy in subsequent experiments.
Effect of ONO-7579 on GBC proliferation. To study the effects of ONO-7579 on GBC proliferation, TYGBK-1 and NOZ cells were treated with ONO-7579 and cell viability was evaluated by MTS assay. ONO-7579 treatment showed the tendency to suppress proliferation in a dose-dependent manner in TYGBK-1 cells, but not in NOZ (Figure 2A). To investigate the mechanism of this difference, we examined the role of AKT and ERK pathway, known to be major players downstream of BDNF/TRKB signaling (16). MK-2206 (AKT inhibitor) and PD325901 (MEK inhibitor) were used to inhibit AKT and ERK pathway, respectively. Optimal drug concentration gradient was determined as shown in Figure 2B. PD325901 suppressed TYGBK-1 proliferation, on the contrary, PD325901 and MK2206 suppressed the NOZ proliferation, respectively (Figure 2C and D). These results suggest that NOZ proliferation mainly depends on the ERK pathway, which ONO-7579 does not affect in these cells because of KRAS mutation. Collectively, these results indicated that ONO-7579 may have antiproliferative effect on GBC cells harboring wild-type KRAS.
Effect of ONO-7579 on BDNF/TRKB-induced GBC migration and invasion. Our previous study indicated that BDNF-induced activation of TRKB contributes to invasive phenotype in GBC cells (8). To determine whether ONO-7579 altered GBC invasive phenotype, migration and invasion assays were performed on NOZ and TYGBK-1 cells treated with ONO-7579. ONO-7579 treatment significantly inhibited the migration and invasion of GBC cells in both cell lines (Figure 3). This trend is particularly notable for TYGBK-1, cells with wild-type KRAS. These data indicate that ONO-7579 inhibited BDNF/TRKB-induced migration and invasiveness, particularly in GBC cells harboring wild-type KRAS.
Effect of ONO-7579 on the expressions of VEGF/VEGFC. Our previous study showed that TRKB expression increases under hypoxic conditions and BDNF/TRKB signaling is involved in VEGF expression via HIF-1α (17). Based on this, we examined whether ONO-7579 altered the expression of VEGFs. Both cell lines were incubated with ONO-7579 under hypoxic conditions for 24 hours. As shown in Figure 4, ONO-7579 reduced the expression of HIF-1α and VEGFs in a dose-dependent manner. These data indicate that ONO-7579 inhibited BDNF/TRKB-induced VEGF expression under hypoxic conditions, such to those found in the cancer microenvironment.
Effect of ONO-7579 on BDNF/TRKB-induced epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) in GBC cell lines. In our previous study, we reported BDNF/TRKB signaling induces EMT by up-regulating transcription factors (SLUG, SNAIL, and TWIST) in GBC (8). In the present study, we evaluated the effect of ONO-7579 on EMT induction in GBC cells. First we examined the morphological changes of ONO-7579-treated cells by analyzing the cell aspect ratio (Figure 5A). In phase-contrast images, we found that control cells showed a spindle-like morphology, which is one of the major characteristics of mesenchymal cells. In contrast, cells treated with ONO-7579 were notably rounded, with epithelial morphology. ONO-7579 treatment substantially reduced the percentage of spindle-shaped cells, and the cells seem to gain cell–cell contacts (Figure 5A).
As shown in Figure 5B, ONO-7579 exposure enhanced E-cadherin expression and reduced vimentin expression in both cell lines. Expression of EMT transcription factors (SLUG, SNAIL, and TWIST) also markedly decreased in TYGBK-1 in a dose-dependent manner, but not clearly in NOZ other than SLUG (Figure 5B). Furthermore, we examined the role of AKT and ERK pathway in EMT in GBC cells, that are also known to play critical roles in tumor invasion and metastasis (16). As shown in Figure 5C, TWIST and SNAIL were activated through the AKT pathway and SLUG were ERK pathway in TYGBK-1 cells. On the contrary, these transcription factors appear to be mainly activated through ERK pathway in NOZ cells. This finding could be one of the causes of the difference between TYGBK-1 and NOZ cells in the inhibitory effect on invasiveness. Taken together, these results demonstrate that ONO-7579 suppressed BDNF/TRKB-induced GBC invasiveness via inhibition of EMT by down-regulating transcription factors (SLUG, SNAIL, and TWIST), particularly in GBC cells harboring wild-type KRAS.
Discussion
The TRK family has three isoforms (TRKA, TRKB, and TRKC) that are encoded by NTRK1, NTRK2, and NTRK3, respectively (18). Although the oncological roles of TRKA, TRKB and TRKC have been shown to be different among tumor types despite their close homology, many reports have shown a relationship between TRKB and malignancy of various solid tumors (3-7). Activation of BDNF/TRKB signals induces the activation of down-stream AKT, ERK (13), and HIF-1α signals (17), which elicits the differential regulation of various cellular activities, such as proliferation (19), differentiation (20), apoptosis (21), and invasion (16). Thus, BDNF/TRKB signaling could be a promising therapeutic target. We previously reported TRKB is potential therapeutic target in some cancer types, including large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (22), squamous cell carcinoma (23) and GBC (8).
K252a, which was used in many previous studies as a pan-TRK inhibitor, has shown activity against a range of TRKB-expressing cancer types. However, K252a inhibits several additional targets such as hepatocyte growth factor receptor (MET), protein kinase C (PKC) and platelet-derived growth factor receptors (PDGFR) (24-25). Therefore, development of potent and selective TRK kinase inhibitors remains critical in order to develop treatment of patients with GBC. Recently, Larotrectinib (LOXO-101), a selective pan-TRK inhibitor, showed dramatic clinical activity in patients with a variety of cancer types harboring an NTRK rearrangement in phase I trials (12). Furthermore, the acquisition of secondary mutations in the TRK kinase domain after treatment with entrectinib is becoming clear (26). ONO-7579, a second-generation pan-TRK inhibitor, is expected to be highly potent and selective oral-pan-TRK inhibitor with efficacy against disease with resistant mutations NTRK1 G595R and G667C (26). No reports have yet shown the efficacy of ONO-7579 for GBC.
We previously reported that TRKB expression in the invasive front correlates with invasion depth and poor patient survival in GBC (8). As mentioned above, the 5-year survival rates differ greatly between patients with stage II and stage III GBC, at 28% and <10%, respectively (1, 2). These findings indicate inhibition of invasiveness and lymphatic metastasis are critical for GBC treatment. The potentially suppressive effects on invasion and lymphovascular metastasis convince us that ONO-7579 would be a powerful treatment option, leading to enhanced outcomes for patients with GBC.
KRAS mutation status testing has been highlighted for determination of treatment plan in recent years, and molecular target therapies, such as anti-EGFR therapy, have been developed for several solid cancer types, but not for GBC (27). A previous report showed that KRAS mutations were found in 19-40% of patients with GBC (28), and a recent report showed that therapies targeting downstream factors of KRAS may be feasible for patients with KRAS mutations (29). Unfortunately, ONO-7579 did not show satisfactory anticancer effect against KRAS-mutant NOZ cells in this experiment.
A potential limitation of our experiment is that we were unable to assess the intracellular biological function of TRK receptors other than TRKB and the effect of ONO-7579 on normal cells at the concentration used in our experiment. In addition, only two GBC cell lines were used, and only in vitro.
Figure 6 depicts a schematic of our present findings. In summary, ONO-7579 showed suppressive effects on proliferation, invasion, and expression of VEGFs, that are thought to be associated with a poor prognosis. ONO-7579 is a promising candidate compound for the treatment of GBC, at least in patients harboring wild-type KRAS, and further study is desired.
Footnotes
Funding
This study was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number 26462146 and 16K10603.
- Received January 19, 2018.
- Revision received February 16, 2018.
- Accepted February 26, 2018.
- Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved