Abstract
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Stathmin 1 (STMN1) suppression was reported to reduce cellular viability and migration potential. However, no previous studies have addressed whether STMN1 overexpression is associated with malignant potential in PDAC. Materials and Methods: To clarify the clinical significance of STMN1 in PDAC, the STMN1 expression in 104 PDAC samples was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we evaluated the proliferative potential and migration ability of pancreatic cancer cell line Suit2 cells highly expressing STMN1. Results: Cytoplasmic STMN1 were higher levels in PDAC than in corresponding non-cancerous tissues. PDAC patients with high STMN1 (n=29) were significantly associated with poor differentiation and distant metastasis compared to those with low STMN1 (n=75). The proliferation rates and migration ability in Suit2-STMN1 were higher than those of Suit2-mock. Conclusion: STMN1 evaluation could be a useful progression marker, and STMN1 may be a promising candidate for targeted therapies in PDAC.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) comprises 90% of all pancreatic cancer cases (1). PDAC is a main cause of mortality, accounting for up to 4% of all cancer-related deaths worldwide. The 5-year survival rate is only 25%, while for those with metastatic disease, it is 1% (2). To cure the patients with PDAC, surgical resection is the mainstay of radical treatment and provides patients who have small and localized pancreatic cancer with longer survival. However, patients with unresectable, metastatic or recurrent PDAC are unlikely to benefit from surgical resection. In addition, PDAC is often resistant to several treatments with chemotherapy, and radiation (1). Therefore, to improve prognosis, it is important to elucidate the mechanisms underlying cancer progression in PDAC.
It is reported that cancer cell migration, e.g. through tumor budding, leads to poor prognosis in PDAC (3). Migratory cancer cells often have therapeutic resistance to several agents (4), and the factors that regulate migratory ability are suggested to be associated with cancer progression and poor prognosis in PDAC. Therefore, in order to improve patient prognosis in PDAC, it might be important to target molecular candidates related to migratory ability and cellular viability.
Stathmin 1 (STMN1, also known as oncoprotein 18) regulates microtubule dynamics by preventing the polymerization of tubulin and promoting microtubule destabilization (5). STMN1 is expressed in various malignancies and its expression is associated with cancer aggressiveness and poor prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (6), non-small cell lung cancer (7), ovarian carcinoma (8), gastric cancer (9, 10), hepatocellular carcinoma (11), colorectal cancer (12), and urinary bladder cancer (13). STMN1 suppression in several cancer cell lines, including PDAC (14), was reported to reduce cellular viability and migration potential. Therefore, it is suggested that STMN1 is a fundamental cancer-associated gene and a potential target for diagnosis and treatment. However, to our knowledge, no previous studies have addressed whether STMN1 overexpression regulates the migratory ability and viability of PDAC cells.
The purpose of this study was to clarify the clinical significance of STMN1 in clinical PDAC samples, and analyze STMN1 function in a PDAC cell line overexpressing STMN1. Therefore, we examined the expression of STMN1 in clinical PDAC samples by using immunohistochemistry to evaluate whether the STMN1 expression can be used as cancer marker in patients with PDAC. Moreover, we evaluated the proliferation potency and migration ability in Suit2 cells expressing a high level of STMN1.
Materials and Methods
Clinical samples. We analyzed tumor specimens from 104 patients with PDAC who underwent excision surgery for a primary tumor between 1999 and 2012 at the Department of General Surgical Science of Gunma University School of Medicine and Gunma Prefecture Saiseikai-Maebashi Hospital, Japan. The patients included 56 men and 48 women. The age range was 36-87 years. The tumor stage was classified according to the seventh tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification of the Union for International Cancer Control (15) and the Sixth General Rules for the Study of Pancreatic Cancer of Japan Pancreas Society (16). Four patients had stage I, 84 had stage II, five had stage III and 11 had stage IV PDAC at the time of surgery. All patients signed written informed consent forms as required by our institutional guidelines.
Immunohistochemical staining. Sections (4-μm) of tumor and non-cancerous tissue were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and incubated with fresh 0.3% hydrogen peroxide in methanol for 30 min at room temperature to block endogenous peroxidase activity. The sections then were heated in boiled water and Immunosaver (Nishin EM, Tokyo, Japan) at 98°C for 45 min. Nonspecific binding sites were blocked by incubation with 10% rabbit pre-immune serum for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with primary monoclonal antibody to STMN1 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at a dilution of 1:100 at 4°C overnight. The sections were washed in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse IgG for 60 min at room temperature (Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan). The chromogen 3,3’-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride was applied as a 0.02% solution containing 0.005% H2O2 in 50 mM ammonium acetate-citrate acid buffer (pH 6.0). The sections were lightly counterstained with Mayer's haematoxylin and mounted. Negative controls were established by replacing the primary antibody with PBS. The immunohistochemical evaluation of STMN1 expression was confirmed independently by two observers. In positive cases, staining was primarily cytoplasmic. The intensity of STMN1 staining was scored as follows: 0: no staining, 1: weak-to-moderate staining, or 2: strong staining. A score of 0 for staining was considered to be low STMN1 expression (n=75), while scores of 1 and 2 were considered to be high STMN1 expression (n=29).
Cell culture. The human pancreatic cancer cell line Suit2 was used in this study. The cell line was obtained from the JCRB cell bank (Ibaragi, Osaka, Japan). The cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Wako, Osaka, Japan) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C.
Establishment of a stable STMN1-transfected pancreatic cancer cell line. Human STMN1 complementary DNA (cDNA) was generated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and subcloned into PiggyBac Dual Promotor Vector PB513B-1 (System Biosciences, Palo Alto, CA, USA) using Ligation high Ver.2 (TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer's protocol. Accurate in-frame insertion into the expression vector was confirmed by sequencing. Transfection into Suit2 cells was performed with PiggyBac Transposase Vector and SBI PureFection transfection reagents (System Biosciences) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and Suit2-STMN1 cells were established. A mock vector-transfected clone (Suit2-mock) was used as a control. Enhanced STMN1 expression was confirmed by RT-PCR and western blot analysis.
RNA extraction and quantitative real-time RT-PCR. Total RNA was extracted from Suit2 cells using the miRN-easy Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and the quantity of isolated RNA was measured using an ND-10000 spectrophotometer (Nano-Drop Technologies, Wilmington, DE, USA). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR was performed using the GoTaq 1-Step RT-qPCR System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) in a total volume of 20 μl. The program included four stages: reverse transcription at 37°C for 15 min; RT inactivation and hot-start activation at 95°C for 10 min; qPCR, of 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s; and dissociation at 60-95°C. The sequences of the primer pairs were as follows: STMN1 forward, 5’-CCGAGAAGAAGATCACCTTGAA-3’; STMN1 reverse, 5’-GACACGTCCTTCTTTTTGAAG C-3’; beta-actin forward, 5’-CCAACCGCGAGAAGATGA-3’; and beta-actin reverse, 5’-CCAGAGGCGTACAGGGATAG-3’.
Protein extraction and western blot analysis. Suit2-mock and Suit2-STMN1 cells were harvested at 80% confluence, and the total proteins were extracted using PRO-PREP Protein Extraction Solution Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Kyungki-Do, Republic of Korea). Total protein was electrophoresed on a 10% polyacrylamide gel, and then electroblotted at 300 mA for 90 min on a nitrocellulose membrane (Invitrogen). Western blotting was used to confirm the expression of STMN1 and heat-shock cognate protein 70 (HSC70) proteins: These proteins were detected using rabbit monoclonal antibody to STMN1 (1:1000; Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Danvers, MA, USA) and mouse monoclonal antibody to HSC70 (1:3000; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc. Dallas, TX, USA). HSC70 expression was used as a loading control. The signals were detected using the ECL Western Blotting Detection System and an Image Quant LAS 4000 machine (GE Healthcare Life Sciences Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).
Immunohistochemical analysis of stathmin 1 (STMN1) expression in representative pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tissue samples. Examples of no STMN1 expression in non-cancerous pancreatic ducts (a), low STMN1 expression in a representative specimen of primary PDAC (b), high STMN1 expression in a representative primary PDAC specimen (c), high-power view of area shown in c (d) (Original magnification ×100).
Proliferation assay. Cell proliferation was measured with Cell Counting Kit-8 (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Suit2-mock and Suit2-STMN1 cells were plated at 5,000 cells per 100 μl medium in 96-well plates. Evaluations were performed at 48 h. To determine cell viability, 10 μl of cell counting solution was added to each well and the plates further incubated at 37°C for 2 h. The absorbance of each well was then determined at 450 nm using a xMark Microplate Absorbance Spectrophotometer (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
Wound-healing assay. Suit2-mock and Suit2-STMN1 cells were plated in 6-well plates until confluence, and a uniform straight wound was produced in the monolayer in each well using a pipette tip. The wells were washed with PBS to remove all the cell debris, and the cells were cultured in 5% CO2 at 37°C. The relative closure rate of the wound was quantitatively evaluated at 72 h using bright-field microscopy.
Statistical analysis. Differences between groups were estimated using Student's t-test, chi-square analysis and analysis of variance. A result was considered statistically significant when the relevant p-value was less than 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed usingJMP software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
Results
Immunohistochemical analysis of STMN1 expression in PDAC tissues. The expression of STMN1 in 104 PDAC specimens was investigated immunohistochemically. STMN1 was expressed more in cancerous tissues than in corresponding non-cancerous tissues and found predominantly present in the cytoplasm. Twenty-nine PDAC specimens were assigned to the high-STMN1 expression group and 75 to the low-STMN1 expression group. Representative results of the immunohistochemistry are shown in Figure 1.
Suit2 cells expressing a high level of stathmin 1 (STMN1) exhibited increased proliferative potential and migratory ability. a: STMN1 mRNA expression level in mock (Suit2-mock) and STMN1-transfected (Suit2-STMN1) cells using real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. b: STMN1 expression levels in Suit2-mock and Suit2-STMN1 cells using western blotting. c: Proliferative rates of Suit2-mock and Suit2-STMN1 cells in 48 hours. d: Wound-healing rates of Suit2-mock and Suit2-STMN1 cells in 72 h. Heat-shock cognate 70 (HSC70) was used as loading control.
Association between STMN1 expression and clinicopathological factors in clinical PDAC samples. The correlations between STMN1 expression in the PDAC specimens and 11 clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are shown in Table I. High STMN1 expression (n=29) was associated with poor differentiation (p=0.0216) and existence of distant metastasis (p=0.0371) compared with low expression (n=75) (Table I). On the other hand, the high-STMN1 expression group did not have poorer prognosis than than the group with low expression (log-rank test: p=0.558, data not shown) unlike other cancer types.
Up-regulation of STMN1 in Suit 2 cells was associated with increased proliferation and migration. The mRNA expression level of STMN1 in Suit2-STMN1 was higher than that of Suit2-mock cells using RT-PCR and western blotting (p=0.0035; Figure 2a and b). The proliferation rates of Suit2-STMN1 cells was higher than that of Suit2-mock cells (p<0.001; Figure 2c). The migratory ability reflected by wound closure rates in Suit2-STMN1 cells was significantly higher than that of Suit2-mock cells (p=0.03; Figure 2d).
Discussion
In this study, we demonstrated that high expression levels of STMN1 in primary PDCA were associated with poor differentiation and progression of distant metastasis. In the in vitro STMN1 expression analyses of PDAC cell line Suit2 cells, proliferative ability and migratory ability in Suit2 cells highly expressing STMN1 were increased compared to control cells.
Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) according to stathmin 1 (STMN1) expression.
Some previous studies revealed that high STMN1 expression is related to poor differentiation in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (17), colorectal cancer (18), gastric adenocarcinoma (19) and lung adenocarcinoma (20). Others reported that high STMN1 expression is related to invasion or metastasis in endometrial carcinoma (21), ovarian carcinoma (8), gastric cancer (10) and hepatocellular carcinoma (11). In this study, high STMN1 expression in PDAC was correlated to poor differentiation and progression of distant metastasis. Moreover, our in vitro data showed that the migratory ability was increased in STMN1-expressing cells. These results are consistent with the previous reports. STMN1 is expected to be progression markers of metastasis and poor differentiation in PDAC as in other cancer types.
Our study revealed higher expression of STMN1 in Suit2 cells to be associated with higher proliferative potency (Figure 2c). From this result, it can be concluded that STMN1 promotes cancer proliferation and viability of PDAC cells. In addition, some previous studies revealed that down-regulation of STMN1 inhibited cellular viability in the following cancer types: gallbladder carcinoma (22), colorectal cancer (12), and urinary bladder cancer (13). Therefore, it is suggested that targeting STMN1 might suppress cancer aggressiveness and that STMN1 may be a promising candidate for targeted therapies in patients with PDAC with high STMN1 expression.
In recent years, the combination of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PTX) and gemcitabine has been used in the treatment for unresectable PDAC (23). Previous reports revealed that high expression of STMN1 might be associated with resistance to taxane chemotherapy and that STMN1 had the potential to be a marker for taxane resistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (24), gastric cancer (9) and esophageal cancer (25, 26). Therefore, it is expected that STMN1 also has potential as a marker for sensitivity to nab-PTX treatment, and suggests that STMN1 is associated with the mechanism of taxane resistance in PDAC. However, we were unable to evaluate the relationship between the expression of STMN1 and the sensitivity to nab-PTX in our present study because it was not until 2014 that nab-paclitaxel became covered by health insurance in Japan. In future, we believe that it is important to clarify the significance of the expression of STMN1 in clinical samples of PDAC treated with nab-PTX.
In conclusion, the expression of STMN1 correlated with PDAC progression. STMN1 expression could be a useful marker for PDAC progression, especially for distant metastasis or poor differentiation. Consistent with these data, in vitro analyses showed STMN1 appears to regulate PDAC proliferation and migration. With respect to developing new molecular cancer therapies, STMN1 may be a promising candidate for targeted therapies in PDAC.
Acknowledgements
The Authors thank Ms. Yukie Saito, Ms. Tomoko Yano, Ms. Yuka Matsui, Ms. Sayaka Okada, and Ms. Kayoko Takahashi for their excellent assistance. The work was supported by JSS Young Researcher Award from Japan Surgical Society, Gunma University Clinical Biobank, and Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) (grant numbers JP 26461969, JP15K10129, JP15K10085, JP26350557 and 17K19893).
Footnotes
↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.
- Received October 24, 2017.
- Revision received November 25, 2017.
- Accepted November 28, 2017.
- Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved