Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Association of Preoperative Nutritional Status with Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Salvage Esophagectomy

MAKOTO SAKAI, MAKOTO SOHDA, TATSUYA MIYAZAKI, TOMONORI YOSHIDA, YUJI KUMAKURA, HIROAKI HONJO, KEIGO HARA, DAIGO OZAWA, SHIGEMASA SUZUKI, NARITAKA TANAKA, TAKEHIKO YOKOBORI and HIROYUKI KUWANO
Anticancer Research February 2018, 38 (2) 933-938;
MAKOTO SAKAI
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: maksakai@gunma-u.ac.jp
MAKOTO SOHDA
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TATSUYA MIYAZAKI
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMONORI YOSHIDA
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJI KUMAKURA
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROAKI HONJO
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEIGO HARA
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAIGO OZAWA
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHIGEMASA SUZUKI
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NARITAKA TANAKA
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKEHIKO YOKOBORI
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYUKI KUWANO
Department of General Surgical Science, Gunma University, Graduate School of Medicine, Maebashi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: To investigate whether malnutrition is associated with poor prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy. We examined the association between the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy. Patients and Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study and reviewed hospital patient records for tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Results: Thirty-two patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) who underwent salvage esophagectomy between 1998 and 2015 at our Institute were included in this study. Univariate analysis revealed that clinical response (p=0.045), preoperative PNI (p<0.001), pT (p=0.024), pN (p=0.004), and residual tumors (p<0.001) were significant prognostic factor for overall survival. Multivariate analysis using age and these five variables found no independent prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis using three preoperative variables (age, clinical response, and preoperative PNI) revealed that PNI was an independent prognostic preoperative factor for overall survival (p=0.005). Conclusion: Preoperative nutritional status is associated with the prognosis of patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy.

  • Esophageal neoplasms prognosis
  • nutritional status
  • salvage esophagectomy

Salvage esophagectomy is now thought to be the only established therapeutic strategy that provides any chance of long-term survival after local failure for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) receiving definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) (1, 2). However, previous studies demonstrated that salvage esophagectomy was associated with high morbidity and mortality rates (1, 3). Long-term outcome of salvage esophagectomy also remains poor, with 5-year survival rate after salvage esophagectomy of 0-33% as described by Watanabe et al. (4) and references therein. When conducting and performing this type of high-risk operation, the patient's nutritional status must not be ignored. Malnutrition has been reported in 60-85% of patient with esophageal cancer. Immunosuppression and malnourished state have been suggested to occur in patients following definitive CRT (5, 6). To date, several studies have reported prognostic factors for patients undergoing salvage esophagectomy, such as pretreatment tumor depth and lymph node metastasis, response to initial CRT, pathological tumor depth and lymph node metastasis, and R0 resection (1, 7-9). However, the actual impact of preoperative nutritional status on the prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy remains unclear. Thus, we hypothesized that malnutrition is associated with the poor prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy. To investigate this hypothesis, we examined the association between the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI), a simple and efficient parameter for evaluating nutritional condition, and prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Patients and Methods

Patients. This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Graduate School of Medicine, Gunma University (approval number 1457). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients before treatment. The criteria for inclusion were patients with ESCC who underwent salvage esophagectomy between 1998 and 2015 at our Institute. Patients were excluded from this study if they had no data on serum albumin and lymphocyte count in peripheral blood within 1 month before surgery and if the follow-up period was less than 1 year for survivors. Hospital patient records were reviewed for tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. Tumor stage and disease grade were classified according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification of the International Union Against Cancer (UICC) (10). The tumor stage was determined conventionally using computed tomography (CT) of the neck, chest, and abdomen, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), endoscopy, and esophagography. The preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated as: 10× serum albumin level (g/dl) + 0.005× lymphocyte count in peripheral blood (11) within 1 month before surgery.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flow chart showing patient recruitment.

Chemoradiation and salvage surgery. Patients received concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for 6 weeks after the diagnostic procedures. External radiotherapy was delivered using a two-field technique with a 10-to 15-MV photon beam at 1.8-2 Gy per fraction per day, five fractions per week, to a total of 50.4-60 Gy. Three concurrent chemotherapy protocols were performed. Concurrent chemotherapy from 1999 to 2004 consisted of 80 mg/m2 nedaplatin on days 1 and 29, followed by 350 mg/m2 5-flurouracil administered as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 1 to 5 and days 29 to 33. Concurrent chemotherapy from 2005 to 2007 consisted of 10 mg/m2 docetaxel on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29, and 36. Concurrent chemotherapy from 2008 consisted of 50 mg/m2 docetaxel on days 1 and 29, 60 mg/m2 cisplatin on days 1 and 29, followed by 600 mg/m2 5-flurouracil administered as a continuous intravenous infusion on days 1 to 4 and days 29 to 32. Salvage esophagectomy was defined as esophagectomy for either residual or recurrent disease following definitive CRT (radiation 50-60 Gy).

Statistical analysis. Subject characteristics were compared using Chi-squared tests for categorical variables and Student's t-test for continuous variables. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were carried out using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Kaplan–Meier curves were generated for overall survival and significance was determined using the log-rank test. A probability value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. All analyses were performed using R version 2.13.0 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) statistical software.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics.

Results

Patient characteristics. The flowchart presented in Figure 1 outlines this study. A total of 40 patients were assessed for eligibility for inclusion in the study. Subsequently, eight patients were excluded. Six patients were excluded for having no data on serum albumin and lymphocyte count in peripheral blood within 1 month before surgery, and two surviving patients for follow-up period less than 1 year. The remaining 32 patients were included in this study. Table I summarizes the baseline characteristics, and Table II summarizes the perioperative data of patients.

Survival analysis. Univariate analysis revealed that clinical response, preoperative PNI, pT, pN, and residual tumors were a significant prognostic factor for overall survival (Table III). Multivariate analysis using age and these five variables found no independent prognostic factors (Table IV). Multivariate analysis using three preoperative variables (age, clinical response, and preoperative PNI) revealed PNI was an independent prognostic preoperative factor for overall survival (Table V). We divided patients into two groups based on PNI value according to previous reports (12): low PNI (PNI <45) and high PNI (PNI ≥45). The overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with high PNI than in those with low PNI (p=0.037; Figure 2). However, disease-specific survival rate had no significant difference according to PNI value (p=0.424; Figure 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Perioperative data.

Comparison of background of esophageal cancer survivors after salvage esophagectomy. Table VI summarizes the baseline characteristics of survivors from primary esophageal cancer, living patients and patients who died from non-cancer -related causes. Preoperative PNI of living patients was significantly higher than those of patients dying from non-cancer causes (p=0.044).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate analysis for overall survival.

Discussion

The most significant finding of the present study was that PNI was an independent prognostic preoperative factor for overall survival of patients with ESCC undergoing salvage esophagectomy. Additionally, the preoperative PNI of patients who remained alive was significantly higher than that of patients dying from non-cancer-related causes among survivors from primary cancer. These results support our hypothesis that preoperative nutritional status is associated with the prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Overall survival of patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma according to their prognostic nutritional index (PNI). The overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with high PNI than in those with low PNI (p=0.037).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Multivariate analysis for overall survival.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Disease-specific survival of patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma according to their prognostic nutritional index (PNI). The disease-specific survival rate did not significantly differ according to PNI value (p=0.424).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Multivariate analysis of preoperative variables for overall survival.

The PNI is one of the tools and is calculated using the serum albumin level and the total lymphocyte count. PNI was previously proposed as a marker to predict the prognosis of patients with gastrointestinal malignancies (12). Although Nozoe et al. had already reported PNI was correlated with the incidence of postoperative complications and prognosis in patients with ESCC (13), to our best knowledge, this is the first study to report a relationship between PNI and prognosis of patients with ESCC who underwent salvage esophagectomy.

Malnutrition has been reported to be associated with poor outcomes and is characterized by a decreased quality of life, weaker response to chemotherapy, and lower survival rates in esophageal cancer (14). Focused on salvage esophagectomy, several preoperative factors (T and N status at initial treatment, time to relapse, and complete response to initial treatment) and postoperative factors (tumor pathological stage, R0 resection and total number of dissected mediastinal lymph nodes) have been reported as prognostic factors as described by Watanabe et al. (4) and references therein. However, the actual impact of preoperative nutritional status on the prognosis of patients underwent salvage esophagectomy was unclear. In our study, clinical response, preoperative PNI, pT, pN, and residual tumors were a significant prognostic factor for overall survival based on univariate analysis. Although multivariate analysis using age and those five variables found no independent prognostic factors, multivariate analysis using three preoperative variables (age, clinical response, and preoperative PNI) revealed PNI was an independent favorable prognostic preoperative factor for overall survival. Our results showed that preoperative nutritional status had a unignorable effect on the long-term outcome after salvage esophagectomy.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VI.

Characteristics of survivors from primary cancer at study end.

In our study, the overall survival rate was significantly higher in patients with high PNI than in those with low PNI. However, the disease-specific survival rate did not significantly differ according to PNI value. Therefore, we next hypothesized that preoperative nutritional status is also associated with death from other illness of survivors after salvage esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Comparing baseline characteristics of survivors from primary esophageal cancer, preoperative PNI of patients who were alive was significantly higher than those of patients dying of other causes (p=0.044). In general, cancer survivors have been recognized to have significantly elevated risk of morbidity due to chronic health conditions (15). Nutrition has a major role in the etiology of chronic health conditions, and poor nutritional status may worsen these morbidities in cancer survivors (16). After receiving definitive CRT, patients are considered to be immune-suppressed, and salvage esophagectomy exacerbates immune suppression even in cancer survivors because of its high invasiveness. Thus, the preoperative nutritional status may predict the postoperative healthy condition even of cancer-free patients after salvage esophagectomy. Perioperative immunonutrition was recently reported to improve both the nutritional and immunological status of surgical patients and reduce the risk of postoperative complications (17-18). Regarding the clinical application of our findings, to improve the outcome of salvage esophagectomy, we speculate that patients with ESCC with poor nutritional status may require more intensive perioperative nutritional support, stricter criteria for salvage surgery and long-term chronic health condition management.

Our study has several potential limitations. Firstly, this was a retrospective study and was performed without randomization of patient selection. Secondly, since we assessed nutritional status as PNI, it remains unclear whether analysis using other nutritional indicators, such as the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and sarcopenia, would lead to the same results.

In conclusion, our study demonstrated that PNI was an independent prognostic preoperative factor for overall survival of patients who underwent salvage esophagectomy for ESCC. Additionally, preoperative PNI of patients remaining alive was significantly higher than that of patients dying from non-cancer-related causes among survivors from primary cancer. Preoperative nutritional status is associated with the poor prognosis of patients who undergo salvage esophagectomy.

  • Received October 24, 2017.
  • Revision received November 16, 2017.
  • Accepted November 23, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Miyata H,
    2. Yamasaki M,
    3. Takiguchi S,
    4. Nakajima K,
    5. Fujiwara Y,
    6. Nishida T,
    7. Mori M,
    8. Doki Y
    : Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for thoracic esophageal cancer. J Surg Oncol 100: 442-446, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Tachimori Y
    : Role of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 57: 71-78, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. D'Journo XB,
    2. Michelet P,
    3. Dahan L,
    4. Doddoli C,
    5. Seitz JF,
    6. Giudicelli R,
    7. Fuentes PA,
    8. Thomas PA
    : Indications and outcome of salvage surgery for oesophageal cancer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 33: 1117-1123, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Watanabe M,
    2. Mine S,
    3. Nishida K,
    4. Yamada K,
    5. Shigaki H,
    6. Matsumoto A,
    7. Sano T
    : Salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Who really benefits from this high-risk surgery? Ann Surg Oncol 22: 4438-4444, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Morita M,
    2. Masuda T,
    3. Okada S,
    4. Yoshinaga K,
    5. Saeki H,
    6. Tokunaga E,
    7. Endo K,
    8. Emi Y,
    9. Kakeji Y,
    10. Maehara Y
    : Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: factors associated with clinical response and postoperative complications. Anticancer Res 29: 2555-2562, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Saeki H,
    2. Masuda T,
    3. Okada S,
    4. Ando K,
    5. Sugiyama M,
    6. Yoshinaga K,
    7. Endo K,
    8. Sadanaga N,
    9. Emi Y,
    10. Kakeji Y,
    11. Morita M,
    12. Yamashita N,
    13. Maehara Y
    : Impact of perioperative peripheral blood values on postoperative complications after esophageal surgery. Surg Today 40: 626-631, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Swisher SG,
    2. Wynn P,
    3. Putnam JB,
    4. Mosheim MB,
    5. Correa AM,
    6. Komaki RR,
    7. Ajani JA,
    8. Smythe WR,
    9. Vaporciyan AA,
    10. Roth JA,
    11. Walsh GL
    : Salvage esophagectomy for recurrent tumors after definitive chemotherapy and radiotherapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 123: 175-183, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Morita M,
    2. Kumashiro R,
    3. Hisamatsu Y,
    4. Nakanishi R,
    5. Egashira A,
    6. Saeki H,
    7. Oki E,
    8. Ohga T,
    9. Kakeji Y,
    10. Tsujitani S,
    11. Yamanaka T,
    12. Maehara Y
    : Clinical significance of salvage esophagectomy for remnant or recurrent cancer following definitive chemoradiotherapy. J Gastroenterol 46: 1284-1291, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Wang S,
    2. Tachimori Y,
    3. Hokamura N,
    4. Igaki H,
    5. Nakazato H,
    6. Kishino T
    : Prognostic analysis of salvage esophagectomy after definitive chemoradiotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the importance of lymphadenectomy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147: 1805-1811, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Sobin L,
    2. Gospodarowicz M WC
    : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, Seventh Edition. Wiley: pp. 243-246, 2009.
  10. ↵
    1. Onodera T,
    2. Goseki N,
    3. Kosaki G
    : Prognostic nutritional index in gastrointestinal surgery of malnourished cancer patients. Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 85: 1001-1005, 1984.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Xu P,
    3. Kang H,
    4. Lin S,
    5. Wang M,
    6. Yang P,
    7. Dai C,
    8. Liu X,
    9. Liu K,
    10. Zheng Y,
    11. Dai Z,
    12. Zhao Y,
    13. Xu P,
    14. Kang H,
    15. Lin S,
    16. Wang M,
    17. Yang P,
    18. Dai C,
    19. Liu X,
    20. Liu K,
    21. Zheng Y,
    22. Dai Z
    : Prognostic nutritional index as a prognostic biomarker for survival in digestive system carcinomas. Oncotarget 5: 86573-86583, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Nozoe T,
    2. Ninomiya M,
    3. Maeda T,
    4. Matsukuma A,
    5. Nakashima H,
    6. Ezaki T
    : Prognostic nutritional index: a tool to predict the biological aggressiveness of gastric carcinoma. Surg Today 40: 440-443, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Miller KR,
    2. Bozeman MC
    : Nutrition therapy issues in esophageal cancer. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 14: 356-366, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Edwards BK,
    2. Noone A-M,
    3. Mariotto AB,
    4. Simard EP,
    5. Boscoe FP,
    6. Henley SJ,
    7. Jemal A,
    8. Cho H,
    9. Anderson RN,
    10. Kohler BA,
    11. Eheman CR,
    12. Ward EM
    : Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer. Cancer 120: 1290-314, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Zhang FF,
    2. Liu S,
    3. John EM,
    4. Must A,
    5. Demark-Wahnefried W
    : Diet quality of cancer survivors and noncancer individuals: Results from a national survey. Cancer 121: 4212-4221, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Takeuchi H,
    2. Ikeuchi S,
    3. Kawaguchi Y,
    4. Kitagawa Y,
    5. Isobe Y,
    6. Kubochi K,
    7. Kitajima M,
    8. Matsumoto S
    : Clinical significance of perioperative immunonutrition for patients with esophageal cancer. World J Surg 31: 2160-2167, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Mudge L,
    2. Isenring E,
    3. Jamieson GG
    : Immunonutrition in patients undergoing esophageal cancer resection. Dis Esophagus 24: 160-165, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 38 (2)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 2
February 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Association of Preoperative Nutritional Status with Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Salvage Esophagectomy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 3 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Association of Preoperative Nutritional Status with Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Salvage Esophagectomy
MAKOTO SAKAI, MAKOTO SOHDA, TATSUYA MIYAZAKI, TOMONORI YOSHIDA, YUJI KUMAKURA, HIROAKI HONJO, KEIGO HARA, DAIGO OZAWA, SHIGEMASA SUZUKI, NARITAKA TANAKA, TAKEHIKO YOKOBORI, HIROYUKI KUWANO
Anticancer Research Feb 2018, 38 (2) 933-938;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Association of Preoperative Nutritional Status with Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Salvage Esophagectomy
MAKOTO SAKAI, MAKOTO SOHDA, TATSUYA MIYAZAKI, TOMONORI YOSHIDA, YUJI KUMAKURA, HIROAKI HONJO, KEIGO HARA, DAIGO OZAWA, SHIGEMASA SUZUKI, NARITAKA TANAKA, TAKEHIKO YOKOBORI, HIROYUKI KUWANO
Anticancer Research Feb 2018, 38 (2) 933-938;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Combining Preoperative Immunoinflammatory Scores and 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron-emission Tomography Predicts Beneficiaries of Salvage Esophagectomy
  • Role of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients With Soft-tissue Sarcoma
  • Influence of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Short-term Outcomes After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer
  • Impact of Sarcopenia in Patients with Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Receiving Chemoradiotherapy
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Feasibility of Computed Tomography-guided Percutaneous Renal Cryoablation Under Local Anesthesia: A Single Center Experience in Taiwan
  • Conversion Surgery for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated With FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine Plus Nab-paclitaxel
  • Gastric Linitis Plastica: Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes from the National Cancer Database
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Esophageal neoplasms prognosis
  • nutritional status
  • Salvage esophagectomy
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire