Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Effect of Combined Epigenetic Treatments and Ectopic NIS Expression on Undifferentiated Thyroid Cancer Cells

MICHELE MASSIMINO, ELENA TIRRÒ, STEFANIA STELLA, FRANCESCO FRASCA, VERONICA VELLA, LAURA SCIACCA, MARIA STELLA PENNISI, SILVIA RITA VITALE, ADRIANA PUMA, CHIARA ROMANO and LIVIA MANZELLA
Anticancer Research December 2018, 38 (12) 6653-6662; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13032

Abstract

Background: Poorly differentiated (PDTC) and anaplastic thyroid (ATC) cancer cells are characterized by the acquisition of epigenetic abnormalities, leading to the silencing of both the sodium iodide co-transporter and the Coxsackie adenovirus receptor. As aberrant histone acetylation and DNA methylation represent epigenetic mechanisms involved in neoplastic transformation, our study investigated the anticancer properties of epigenetic modifiers in thyroid carcinoma. Materials and Methods: The cytotoxicity and gene expression modulation of histone deacetylase and DNA methyltransferase inhibitors were evaluated in both PDTC and ATC. Results: Epigenetic treatments were cytotoxic to tumor thyrocytes and restored sodium iodide co-transporter and Coxsackie adenovirus receptor, expression as well as radioiodine uptake, in PDTC but not in ATC. However, ectopic expression sodium iodide co-transporter re-activated radioiodine incorporation in ATC. Conclusion: The ability of epigenetic treatments to interfere with tumor proliferation and induce Coxsackie adenovirus receptor expression, coupled with the ability of ectopic sodium iodide co-transporter to restore radioiodine uptake, raise the possibility that these therapeutic approaches may provide clinical benefit to patients with thyroid carcinoma refractory to radioiodine treatment.

Thyroid cancer is the most frequent form of endocrine malignancy, accounting for about 1.7% of all human cancer in the US. Neoplastic transformation of the follicular epithelium can give rise to differentiated (DTC), poorly differentiated (PDTC) or anaplastic (ATC) thyroid carcinomas with an aggressive clinical behavior associated with a dismal prognosis (1, 2). Conventional therapy for DTCs and PDTCs consists of total thyroidectomy and radioiodine (131I) therapy driven by expression of the sodium iodide co-transporter (solute carrier family 5 member 5, SLC5A5; NIS), with >95% survival rates at 5 years. However, 15-20% of PDTCs and all ATCs display loss of NIS expression, compromising their ability to concentrate radioiodine. Hence, the therapeutic options for these patients become limited and largely unsuccessful (3, 4). Increasing knowledge of the molecular alterations underlying thyroid carcinogenesis has led to the identification of several genetic events contributing to neoplastic transformation such as activating mutations in V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF), V-Ha-ras Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (HRAS), V-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS), and neuroblastoma RAS viral (v-ras) oncogene homolog (NRAS); rearranged during transfection/papillary thyroid cancer (RET/PTC); and additional alterations involving genes of the p53 family and interferon regulatory factor 5 (IRF5) (1, 5-8). While each of these genes represents a potential therapeutic target, to date only anti-BRAF-directed drugs have been approved for this aggressive disease (4, 9).

In the search for novel therapeutic strategies, several reports have focused on the role of epigenetic modifications in thyroid tumorigenesis. Indeed, aberrant DNA methylation, improper chromatin remodeling and microRNA-dependent silencing of phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), ras-related protein (RAPB), paired box 8 (PAX8) and NIS have been frequently reported in PDTCs and ATCs (10, 11). With the advent of an ever-increasing number of epigenetic modulators, targeting the epigenetic machinery is considered a potential therapeutic approach in cancer treatment (12-14) including undifferentiated thyroid carcinomas (15). Likewise, the use of appropriately engineered viral vectors to perform gene therapy approaches has become an additional therapeutic possibility for these patients (16). To this end, recombinant adenoviral vectors have been preferred to other viral gene delivery systems as they offer multiple advantages in terms of safety (lack of genotoxicity), high gene expression and successful clinical use for suicide gene therapy strategies (17-19). However, many PDTCs and all ATCs exhibit a progressive loss in cell differentiation promoted by epigenetic alterations or by constitutive V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1(RAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases (ERK) activation that leads to a deficit in expression of the Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR), the high affinity receptor required for effective adenoviral-mediated gene therapy (10, 20-23). We therefore employed two epigenetic modifiers valproic acid (VPA) and 5-azacytidine (5-AC) to establish whether these drugs would lead to the re-expression of both NIS and CAR, thereby resensitizing PDT and ATC cells to radioiodine therapy.

View this table:
Table I.

Primers used in reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction in this study.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and treatment. Human immortalized poorly differentiated NPA and FTC-133, and anaplastic C-643 and SW-1736 thyroid carcinoma cell lines (DSMZ; Leibniz Institute DSMZ-German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures) were used in this study. NPA cells were grown in RPMI-1640 medium; C-643 and SW-1736 in minimum essential medium, while FTC-133 were kept in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium-F12 (DMEM-F12). All media were supplemented with 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/mI penicillin and 100 μg/mI streptomycin (all from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO USA) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) (EuroClone, Milan, Italy). The FRTL-5 cell line derived from normal thyroid glands of 5-to 6-week-old Fischer rats was cultivated in DMEM-F12. All cells were maintained in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. In all experiments performed with drug treatment, the cells were either left untreated or exposed to VPA (3 mM) alone, 5-AC (1 μM) (all from Sigma-Aldrich) alone, or treated with a combination of the two drugs as specified in Figure 1A. Fresh culture medium with the drugs was replaced every 24 hours.

Primary cultures. Normal thyrocytes were derived from tissues obtained at surgery with the informed consent of each donor. Primary cultures were obtained as previously described (24).

RNA extraction and reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Total RNA was extracted by Trizol reagent from each cell line and reverse-transcribed with Superscript III according to the manufacturers protocol. RT-PCR reactions were performed using Pfx platinum polymerase (Invitrogen, Paisley, UK) using the primers given in Table I.

Cell proliferation, cell death and cell-cycle analyses. Thyroid cells were incubated in 96-well plates and their proliferation rates determined by the CellTiter 96 AQueous Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay (Promega, WI, USA). Apoptosis was measured staining the cells with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) (BD Pharmigen, Milan, Italy), while cell-cycle analyses were performed as previously reported (25).

Migration assays. Migration assays were performed as previously described (26, 27).

Plasmid constructs and cell transfection. Full-length NIS cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. S. M. Jhiang, Ohio State University) was removed from the pcDNA3 expression vector and ligated in the p3XFLAG-CMV-14 vector (Sigma-Aldrich) using EcoRI as a unique restriction site. pNIS-3XFLAG was employed for transient transfection into C-643 and SW-1736 cell lines using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen).

Isolation of plasma membrane protein and immunoblot analysis. C-643 and SW-1736 cell lines, transfected with empty vector or with a plasmid expressing pNIS-3xFLAG, were used to obtain plasma membrane samples using the Qproteome plasma membrane protein kit (Qiagen, KJ Venlo, the Netherlands). Protein extraction and transfer to appropriate blotting membranes were performed as previously described (28). Nitrocellulose membranes were then hybridized with anti-FLAG M2, anti-actin (both from Sigma-Aldrich), anti-CAR, anti-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and anti-Na/K-ATPase (all from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). Appropriate horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies were added (Amersham, GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and proteins were visualized using the LiteAblot enhanced chemi-luminescence reagent (EuroClone).

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

The sequential combination of 5-azacytidine (5-AC) and valproic acid (VPA) had cytotoxic effects on thyroid cancer cells and tolerable toxicity in normal thyrocytes. A: Schematic representation of the VPA and 5-AC combination. B: The indicated cell lines or normal thyrocytes (UPN#15) were exposed to VPA or 5-AC alone or in combination as reported in (A). B: Histograms show proliferation evaluated by MTS assay compared to the untreated condition arbitrarily set at 100%. C: Thyroid cancer cell lines and primary thyrocytes (UPN#15) were left untreated or exposed to VPA and 5-AC, alone and in combination, and then subjected to annexin-V staining. Histograms show the percentage of annexin-V-positive apoptotic cells as analyzed by flow cytometry. In (B) and (C) bars indicate standard deviation derived from three (NPA, FTC-133, C-643, SW-1736) or two (UPN#15) independent experiments. Significantly different at **p<0.01 and ***p<0.001.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Exposure to 5-azacytidine (5-AC) and valproic acid (VPA) arrested thyroid cancer cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Cancer cells were left untreated or incubated with VPA and 5-AC as reported in Figure 1A and then stained with propidium iodide. Histograms, gated for subG0-G1 populations in order to normalize for treatment-induced cell death, show the cell-cycle distribution of thyroid cancer cells as analyzed by flow cytometry. Bars indicate the standard deviation obtained from three independent experiments. Significantly different at *p<0.05 and **p<0.01.

Iodine uptake. Uptake of 125I by cancer cells NPA, FTC-133, C643, SW-1736 or FTRL-5 in each experimental condition was measured as previously described (29) with the following modifications. Briefly, after exposure to drugs, as indicated in the Materials and Methods, cells were split and seeded onto 12-well plates. The culture medium (with or without drugs) was aspirated, and cells were washed with 1 mI of Hank's balanced salt solution (HBSS) (Life Technologies) supplemented with HEPES 10 mM (pH 7.3). To each well, 500 μl of buffered HBSS containing 0.1 μCi carrier-free Na125I and 10 μm NaI (specific activity, 20 mCi/mmol) were added. In half of the wells, the buffer also contained the NIS inhibitor, KClO4 (100 μm), as a control for non-specific uptake. After a 40-min incubation at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere, the radioactive medium was aspirated, and cells were washed with 1 mI of ice-cold HBSS. One milliliter of 95% ethanol was added to each well for 20 min, and then transferred into vials for gamma-counting to measure the amount of 125I associated with the cells. Each experiment was performed at least twice in quadruplicates, and rat FRTL-5 cells were included as a positive control. Radioactivity was then normalized to total cell number.

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Exposure to 5-azacytidine (5-AC) and valproic acid (VPA) reduced the invasiveness of poorly differentiated carcinoma cell lines. Thyroid cell lines were subjected to an invasion assay that measured their ability to cross an 8 μm transwell in the presence or absence of VPA/5-AC. Histograms indicate the percentage of migrated cells compared to the untreated condition arbitrarily set at 100%. Bars represent the standard deviation derived from three independent experiments. Significantly different at *p<0.05 and **p<0.01.

Statistical analysis. Unpaired, single-tailed t-tests with 95% confidence intervals were used to perform statistical analysis employing PRISM software (GraphPad Software Inc.) with significance accepted at p<0.05.

Results

The sequential combination of VPA and 5-AC had cytotoxic effects on thyroid carcinoma cells. To assess the anti-proliferative effects of epigenetic modulators on thyroid cancer cells and normal thyrocytes, cells were exposed to 3 mM VPA (30) and 1 μM 5-AC (31) alone, or in a sequential combination as summarized in Figure 1A. VPA and 5-AC as single agents only reduced the proliferative rate of NPA and FTC-133 cells. On the contrary, we observed that the combination significantly impaired the proliferative rates of the entire panel of thyroid carcinoma cells. Interestingly, the proliferative ability of primary healthy thyrocytes (UPN#15) was not significantly affected (Figure 1B). Annexin-V staining showed that VPA and 5-AC alone failed to induce significant apoptosis of NPA, FTC-133, C-643 and SW-1736 cancer cells, while their combination increased the apoptotic rate of these cells by 3-4-fold. Lower, albeit significant, cytotoxicity was also observed in primary normal thyrocytes (UPN#15) (Figure 1C).

Combination VPA and 5-AC arrested thyroid cancer cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle. Epigenetic modifications alter cell-cycle distribution thus influencing cell fate (32). We therefore wanted to evaluate if thyroid cancer cells surviving VPA/5-AC treatment were arrested in a specific phase of the cell cycle. To this end, after exposure to VPA with/without 5-AC, we analyzed their cell cycle distribution. After treatment with the combination of VPA and 5-AC, all thyroid cancer lines displayed a significant increase in the population cells in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle (Figure 2).

Combined epigenetic treatment reduced metastatic potential in PDTC cells. Previous studies have suggested that epigenetic modifications influence tumor cell motility and invasion (33-35). We therefore examined the effect of VPA and 5-AC on the invasive phenotype of poorly differentiated and ATC cells by measuring their ability to migrate across an 8 μm trans-well. Poorly differentiated NPA and FTC-133 cells were sensitive to effect of VPA combined with 5-AC as they displayed a 40-50% reduction in their motility (Figure 3A and B). On the contrary, VPA and 5-AC failed to exert any significant effect on the invasive ability of ATC cells (Figure 3C and D).

Combination of VPA and 5-AC restored NIS expression and radioiodine uptake in PDTC cells. Fifteen to 20% of poorly differentiated thyroid cancer cells and all anaplastic thyroid carcinomas display a complete deficit of NIS expression, thereby resulting in their being unresponsive to radio-metabolic therapy (4). Previous evidence has indicated that histone deacetylase inhibition (36) and BRAF or p53 mutational status influence NIS transcription (37, 38). Our cell lines display a wide combination of BRAF and p53 alterations as NPA has mutations in both oncogenes (39, 40), FTC-133 and C-643 only carry a p53 mutation (41, 42), and SW1736 is p53-null but expresses wild-type BRAF (43). In order to establish the NIS expression pattern of our thyroid cancer panel, total RNA was extracted, reverse transcribed into cDNA and amplified by PCR. No NIS transcripts were detected in any of the analyzed cells (Figure 4A). We next exposed these lines to VPA and 5-AC and repeated the anaIysis, observing that these treatments restored NIS expression in NPA and FTC-133 cells but not in the anaplastic lines C-643 and SW-1736 (Figure 4B). In detail, VPA had no effect on NIS transcription in NPA cells, unlike 5-AC that successfully restored NIS expression both as a single agent and in combination with VPA. The opposite was true in FTC-133 cells, suggesting that different epigenetic aberrations are responsible for NIS silencing in different thyroid cancer cell lines.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

5-azacytidine (5-AC) and valproc acid (VPA) restored sodium iodide co-transporter (NIS) expression and iodide uptake in poorly differentiated thyroid cells. A: Total RNA was extracted from the indicated untreated thyroid cancer lines and then subjected to reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for NIS gene amplification. Ctrl-and Ctrl+ represent negative and positive controls, respectively. B: The specified thyroid cancer cells were exposed to VPA/5-AC as per Figure 1A then total RNA was extracted subjected to NIS amplification by RT-PCR. C: Thyroid cancer cells were exposed to VPA/5-AC and then a radioiodine up-take assay was performed. Histograms present the counts per minute (CPM) dependent on the amount of 125I incorporated by cells. Nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) was used as loading control. Bars indicate the standard deviation derived from three independent experiments. FTRL-5 cells were used as a positive control and ClO4− to measure non-specific binding. Significantly different at *p<0.05.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Ectopic sodium iodide co-transporter (NIS) expression restored radioiodine up-take in undifferentiated thyroid cancer cells. A: C-643 and SW-1736 cells were transiently transfected with empty vector (EV) or 3xFLAG-NIS and then subjected to plasma/membrane protein purification. To confirm 3xFLAG-NIS expression, total cell lysates (T) and the eluted fraction (E) were separated by sodium dodecyl sulphate - polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and then membranes were hybridized with the indicated antibodies. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) and Na/K-ATPase were used as a control to confirm correct plasma/membrane protein separation. B: The same cell lines were used to measure 125I uptake in the presence of ClO4− to obtain non-specific radioiodine uptake/binding. Histograms represent counts per minute (CPM) dependent on the amount of 125I incorporated by cells. Bars indicate the standard deviation of three independent experiments. Significantly different at ***p<0.001.

We next wanted to investigate whether NIS transcription generated a functional protein capable of radioiodine uptake. We therefore performed iodine uptake assays and found that NPA and FTC-133 cells expressing NIS after treatment with both VPA and 5-AC incorporated significant amounts of radioiodine (Figure 4C), demonstrating that drugs targeting a broad spectrum of epigenetic substrates can successfully restore NIS expression and function in PDTC cells.

Ectopic NIS expression restored radioiodine uptake in ATC cells. Failure to restore NIS expression in ATC cells after exposure to VPA and 5-AC might be due to microRNA-dependent gene silencing that will not respond to epigenetic modifiers (44). However, even if restoring NIS expression is successful, it is unknown whether ATC cells preserve the molecular machinery required for proper NIS function. We therefore transiently transfected C-643 and SW-1736 cells with a vector coding for a 3xFLAG-NIS and observed both FLAG-NIS protein expression and correct migration to the membrane (Figure 5A). Accordingly, the transfected cells were able to incorporate 125I in radioiodine uptake assays (Figure 5B).

Epigenetic modification induced CAR expression in PDTC and ATC cells. The CAR is a high affinity receptor for adenovirus and previous evidence suggests that its expression is regulated by epigenetic mechanisms (20, 23). Considering the emerging interest in adenovirus-based genetic therapy in cancer (16-19), we evaluated CAR expression before and after thyroid cancer cell exposure to VPA/5-AC. Surprisingly, these epigenetic modifiers induced CAR mRNA re-expression (Figure 6A), with immunoblots confirming the protein translation of the CAR transcripts detected in NPA, FTC-133, C-643 and SW-1736 cells exposed to VPA/5-AC (Figure 6B).

Discussion

The concept of precision medicine postulates that effective treatment strategies should be tailored to the distinct variability of both the patient and their disease, thus identifying personalized pharmacological approaches for each individual (45). Indeed, most patients with thyroid cancer diagnosed with well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma undergo surgery and, if needed, ‘targeted’ radioiodine therapy, thus achieving high overall survival rates. However, this approach generates limited benefits for patients with PDTC or ATC. Therefore, additional treatment strategies are urgently needed for these aggressive tumors usually associated with a dismal prognosis (4). In this study, we employed an epigenetic treatment for both immortalized and primary thyroid cancer cells representative of PDTCs and ATCs and analyzed its cytotoxic effects and its ability to modulate NIS and CAR expression. We demonstrate that VPA and 5-AC reduced the proliferative potential of thyroid cancer cells, blocking them in the G2/M phase of the cell cycle and increasing their apoptotic rate. We also show that this drug combination effectively reduced the invasive ability of PDTC cells but faiIed to exert the same effect on ATCs, as in the latter biological context, multiple mechanisms are probably involved in the modulation of cell migration. Finally, we found that our pharmacological chromatin remodeling strategy successfully restored NIS gene expression and iodide uptake in PDTCs but not in ATCs. However, as VPA and 5-AC induce CAR re-expression in both PDTC and ATC, CAR re-activation raises the possibility that gene therapy may be employed to exogenously re-establish the NIS level in ATCs. In turn, since ATC cells maintained their ability to locate the NIS protein in the cell membrane, restoring NIS expression may allow the use of radiometabolic therapy for this lethal disease.

Figure 6.
Figure 6.

Valproic acid (VPA) and 5-azacytidine (5-AC) restored Coxsackie adenovirus receptor (CAR) expression in thyroid cancer cells. A: The indicated thyroid cancer cell lines were exposed to the VPA and 5-AC combination and then used to perform reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction for CAR and nuclear receptor coactivator 4 (NCOA4) (loading control). Ctrl: Negative control. B: Protein lysates from the same cells were used to assess CAR expression by immunoblot. Actin and the human embryonic kidney 293 cell line were used as loading and positive controls, respectively.

In summary, our findings suggest that the use of epigenetic modifiers may represent a useful pharmacological approach for PDTC and ATC as confirmed by several clinical trials demonstrating the antitumor efficacy of different HDCA inhibitors, 5-AC (NCT00134043), (NCT01013597), (NCT00004062) and recombinant adenoviral vectors to induce specific gene expression (NCT00902122) (46, 47). Furthermore, given the well-known safety profile of these drugs and their minimal toxicity to normal thyrocytes, it is conceivable that this strategy may be well tolerated in the clinical setting.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Professor Paolo Vigneri for helpful suggestions and for critical reading of the manuscript. This work is dedicated in memory of Alessandra Alosi.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Received October 23, 2018.
  • Revision received November 4, 2018.
  • Accepted November 7, 2018.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Manzella L,
    2. Stella S,
    3. Pennisi MS,
    4. Tirro E,
    5. Massimino M,
    6. Romano C,
    7. Puma A,
    8. Tavarelli M,
    9. Vigneri P
    : New insights in thyroid cancer and p53 family proteins. Int J Mol Sci 18(6): 1325, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Vigneri R,
    2. Malandrino P,
    3. Giani F,
    4. Russo M,
    5. Vigneri P
    : Heavy metals in the volcanic environment and thyroid cancer. Mol Cell Endocrinol 457: 73-80, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Gianì F,
    2. Tumino D,
    3. Frasca F
    : Resistance to kinase inhibitors in poorly differentiated and anaplastic thyroid cancer: Preclinical in vitro evidences. EndocrinoI Metabol Syndr 5(5): 251, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Viola D,
    2. Valerio L,
    3. Molinaro E,
    4. Agate L,
    5. Bottici V,
    6. Biagini A,
    7. Lorusso L,
    8. Cappagli V,
    9. Pieruzzi L,
    10. Giani C,
    11. Sabini E,
    12. Passannati P,
    13. Puleo L,
    14. Matrone A,
    15. Pontillo-Contillo B,
    16. Battaglia V,
    17. Mazzeo S,
    18. Vitti P,
    19. Elisei R
    : Treatment of advanced thyroid cancer with targeted therapies: Ten years of experience. Endocr Relat Cancer 23(4): R185-205, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Vella V,
    2. Puppin C,
    3. Damante G,
    4. Vigneri R,
    5. Sanfilippo M,
    6. Vigneri P,
    7. Tell G,
    8. Frasca F
    : DeltaNP73alpha inhibits PTEN expression in thyroid cancer cells. Int J Cancer 124(11): 2539-2548, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Messina RL,
    2. Sanfilippo M,
    3. Vella V,
    4. Pandini G,
    5. Vigneri P,
    6. Nicolosi ML,
    7. Giani F,
    8. Vigneri R,
    9. Frasca F
    : Reactivation of p53 mutants by prima-1 [corrected] in thyroid cancer cells. Int J Cancer 130(10): 2259-2270, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vella V,
    2. Zhu J,
    3. Frasca F,
    4. Li CY,
    5. Vigneri P,
    6. Vigneri R,
    7. Wang JY
    : Exclusion of c-abl from the nucleus restrains the p73 tumor suppression function. J Biol Chem 278(27): 25151-25157, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Massimino M,
    2. Vigneri P,
    3. Fallica M,
    4. Fidilio A,
    5. Aloisi A,
    6. Frasca F,
    7. Manzella L
    : Irf5 promotes the proliferation of human thyroid cancer cells. Mol Cancer 11: 21, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Licitra L,
    2. Locati LD
    : Multikinase inhibitors in thyroid cancer. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 10): x328-333, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Faam B,
    2. Ghaffari MA,
    3. Ghadiri A,
    4. Azizi F
    : Epigenetic modifications in human thyroid cancer. Biomed Rep 3(1): 3-8, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Neumann KS,
    2. Reske A,
    3. Reske A,
    4. Emmrich P,
    5. Paschke R
    : Lack of correlation for sodium iodide symporter mRNA and protein expression and analysis of sodium iodide symporter promoter methylation in benign cold thyroid nodules. Thyroid 14(2): 99-111, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Yoo CB,
    2. Jones PA
    : Epigenetic therapy of cancer: Past, present and future. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5(1): 37-50, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Massimino M,
    2. Stella S,
    3. Tirro E,
    4. Romano C,
    5. Pennisi MS,
    6. Puma A,
    7. Manzella L,
    8. Zanghi A,
    9. Stagno F,
    10. Di Raimondo F,
    11. Vigneri P
    : Non ABL-directed inhibitors as alternative treatment strategies for chronic myeloid leukemia. Mol Cancer 17(1): 56, 2018.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Feinberg AP,
    2. Koldobskiy MA,
    3. Gondor A
    : Epigenetic modulators, modifiers and mediators in cancer aetiology and progression. Nat Rev Genet 17(5): 284-299, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Zhu X,
    2. Cheng SY
    : Epigenetic modifications: Novel therapeutic approach for thyroid cancer. Endocrinol Metab 32(3): 326-331, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Wirth T,
    2. Yla-Herttuala S
    : Gene therapy used in cancer treatment. Biomedicines 2(2): 149-162, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Lee CS,
    2. Bishop ES,
    3. Zhang R,
    4. Yu X,
    5. Farina EM,
    6. Yan S,
    7. Zhao C,
    8. Zheng Z,
    9. Shu Y,
    10. Wu X,
    11. Lei J,
    12. Li Y,
    13. Zhang W,
    14. Yang C,
    15. Wu K,
    16. Wu Y,
    17. Ho S,
    18. Athiviraham A,
    19. Lee MJ,
    20. Wolf JM,
    21. Reid RR,
    22. He TC
    : Adenovirus-mediated gene delivery: Potential applications for gene and cell-based therapies in the new era of personalized medicine. Genes Dis 4(2): 43-63, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Kesmodel SB,
    2. Spitz FR
    : Gene therapy for cancer and metastatic disease. Expert Rev Mol Med 5(17): 1-18, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Zarogoulidis P,
    2. Darwiche K,
    3. Sakkas A,
    4. Yarmus L,
    5. Huang H,
    6. Li Q,
    7. Freitag L,
    8. Zarogoulidis K,
    9. Malecki M
    : Suicide gene therapy for cancer-current strategies. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther 4: 16849, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  20. ↵
    1. Pong RC,
    2. Lai YJ,
    3. Chen H,
    4. Okegawa T,
    5. Frenkel E,
    6. Sagalowsky A,
    7. Hsieh JT
    : Epigenetic regulation of Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor (CAR) gene promoter in urogenital cancer cells. Cancer Res 63: 8680-8686, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nikiforov YE
    : Thyroid carcinoma: Molecular pathways and therapeutic targets. Mod Pathol 21(Suppl 2): S37-43, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Reeh M,
    2. Bockhorn M,
    3. Gorgens D,
    4. Vieth M,
    5. Hoffmann T,
    6. Simon R,
    7. Izbicki JR,
    8. Sauter G,
    9. Schumacher U,
    10. Anders M
    : Presence of the Coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor (CAR) in human neoplasms: A multitumour array analysis. Br J Cancer 109(7): 1848-1858, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Pong RC,
    2. Roark R,
    3. Ou JY,
    4. Fan J,
    5. Stanfield J,
    6. Frenkel E,
    7. Sagalowsky A,
    8. Hsieh JT
    : Mechanism of increased Coxsackie and adenovirus receptor gene expression and adenovirus uptake by phytoestrogen and histone deacetylase inhibitor in human bladder cancer cells and the potential clinical application. Cancer Res 66(17): 8822-8828, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Tirro E,
    2. Consoli ML,
    3. Massimino M,
    4. Manzella L,
    5. Frasca F,
    6. Sciacca L,
    7. Vicari L,
    8. Stassi G,
    9. Messina L,
    10. Messina A,
    11. Vigneri P
    : Altered expression of c-IAP1, survivin, and SMAC contributes to chemotherapy resistance in thyroid cancer cells. Cancer Res 66(8): 4263-4272, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Massimino M,
    2. Consoli ML,
    3. Mesuraca M,
    4. Stagno F,
    5. Tirro E,
    6. Stella S,
    7. Pennisi MS,
    8. Romano C,
    9. Buffa P,
    10. Bond HM,
    11. Morrone G,
    12. Sciacca L,
    13. Di Raimondo F,
    14. Manzella L,
    15. Vigneri P
    : IRF5 is a target of BCR–ABL kinase activity and reduces cml cell proliferation. Carcinogenesis 35(5): 1132-1143, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Vella V,
    2. Malaguarnera R,
    3. Nicolosi ML,
    4. Palladino C,
    5. Spoleti C,
    6. Massimino M,
    7. Vigneri P,
    8. Purrello M,
    9. Ragusa M,
    10. Morrione A,
    11. Belfiore A
    : Discoidin domain receptor 1 modulates insulin receptor signaling and biological responses in breast cancer cells. Oncotarget 8(26): 43248, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Vella V,
    2. Nicolosi ML,
    3. Cantafio P,
    4. Massimino M,
    5. Lappano R,
    6. Vigneri P,
    7. Ciuni R,
    8. Gangemi P,
    9. Morrione A,
    10. Malaguarnera R,
    11. Belfiore A
    : DDR1 regulates thyroid cancer cell differentiation via IGF-2/IR-A autocrine signaling loop. Endocr Relat Cancer 26(1): pii: ERC-18-0310, 2018.
  28. ↵
    1. Stella S,
    2. Tirro E,
    3. Conte E,
    4. Stagno F,
    5. Di Raimondo F,
    6. Manzella L,
    7. Vigneri P
    : Suppression of survivin induced by a BCR–ABL/JAK2/STAT3 pathway sensitizes imatinib-resistant CML cells to different cytotoxic drugs. Mol Cancer Ther 12(6): 1085-1098, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Liu Z,
    2. Xing M
    : Induction of sodium/iodide symporter (NIS) expression and radioiodine uptake in non-thyroid cancer cells. PLoS One 7(2): e31729, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Michaelis M,
    2. Michaelis UR,
    3. Fleming I,
    4. Suhan T,
    5. Cinatl J,
    6. Blaheta RA,
    7. Hoffmann K,
    8. Kotchetkov R,
    9. Busse R,
    10. Nau H,
    11. Cinatl J Jr..
    : Valproic acid inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Mol Pharmacol 65(3): 520-527, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Stresemann C,
    2. Brueckner B,
    3. Musch T,
    4. Stopper H,
    5. Lyko F
    : Functional diversity of DNA methyltransferase inhibitors in human cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 66(5): 2794-2800, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Ma Y,
    2. Kanakousaki K,
    3. Buttitta L
    : How the cell cycle impacts chromatin architecture and influences cell fate. Front Genet 6: 19, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Dawson MA,
    2. Kouzarides T
    : Cancer epigenetics: From mechanism to therapy. Cell 150(1): 12-27, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Brockmeyer P,
    2. Hemmerlein B
    : Epigenetic modification suppresses proliferation, migration and invasion of urothelial cancer cell lines. Oncol Lett 12(3): 1693-1700, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Xu H,
    2. Xiao Q,
    3. Fan Y,
    4. Xiang T,
    5. Li C,
    6. Li C,
    7. Li S,
    8. Hui T,
    9. Zhang L,
    10. Li H,
    11. Li L,
    12. Ren G
    : Epigenetic silencing of adamts18 promotes cell migration and invasion of breast cancer through akt and nf-kappab signaling. Cancer Med 6(6): 1399-1408, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Kelkar MG,
    2. Senthilkumar K,
    3. Jadhav S,
    4. Gupta S,
    5. Ahn BC,
    6. De A
    : Enhancement of human sodium iodide symporter gene therapy for breast cancer by HDAC inhibitor mediated transcriptional modulation. Sci Rep 6: 19341, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Choi YW,
    2. Kim HJ,
    3. Kim YH,
    4. Park SH,
    5. Chwae YJ,
    6. Lee J,
    7. Soh EY,
    8. Kim JH,
    9. Park TJ
    : B-RAFV600E inhibits sodium iodide symporter expression via regulation of DNA methyltransferase 1. Exp Mol Med 46: e120, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Guerrieri F,
    2. Piconese S,
    3. Lacoste C,
    4. Schinzari V,
    5. Testoni B,
    6. Valogne Y,
    7. Gerbal-Chaloin S,
    8. Samuel D,
    9. Brechot C,
    10. Faivre J,
    11. Levrero M
    : The sodium/iodide symporter NIS is a transcriptional target of the p53-family members in liver cancer cells. Cell Death Dis 4: e807, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Fagin JA,
    2. Matsuo K,
    3. Karmakar A,
    4. Chen DL,
    5. Tang SH,
    6. Koeffler HP
    : High prevalence of mutations of the p53 gene in poorly differentiated human thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Invest 91(1): 179-184, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Liu D,
    2. Liu Z,
    3. Condouris S,
    4. Xing M
    : BRAF V600E maintains proliferation, transformation, and tumorigenicity of BRAF-mutant papillary thyroid cancer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(6): 2264-2271, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Bamford S,
    2. Dawson E,
    3. Forbes S,
    4. Clements J,
    5. Pettett R,
    6. Dogan A,
    7. Flanagan A,
    8. Teague J,
    9. Futreal PA,
    10. Stratton MR,
    11. Wooster R
    : The COSMIC (Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer) database and website. Br J Cancer 91(2): 355-358, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Lindkvist A,
    2. Franzen A,
    3. Ren ZP,
    4. Heldin NE,
    5. Paulsson-Karlsson Y
    : Differential effects of TGF-beta1 on telomerase activity in thyroid carcinoma cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 338(3): 1625-1633, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Frasca F,
    2. Vella V,
    3. Aloisi A,
    4. Mandarino A,
    5. Mazzon E,
    6. Vigneri R,
    7. Vigneri P
    : P73 tumor-suppressor activity is impaired in human thyroid cancer. Cancer Res 63(18): 5829-5837, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Li L,
    2. Lv B,
    3. Chen B,
    4. Guan M,
    5. Sun Y,
    6. Li H,
    7. Zhang B,
    8. Ding C,
    9. He S,
    10. Zeng Q
    : Inhibition of mir-146b expression increases radioiodine-sensitivity in poorly differential thyroid carcinoma via positively regulating NIS expression. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 462(4): 314-321, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Dugger SA,
    2. Platt A,
    3. Goldstein DB
    : Drug development in the era of precision medicine. Nat Rev Drug Discov 17(3): 183-196, 2018.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Saito H,
    2. Kitagawa K,
    3. Yoneda T,
    4. Fukui Y,
    5. Fujsawa M,
    6. Bautista D,
    7. Shirakawa T
    : Combination of p53-DC vaccine and RAD4–p53 gene therapy induced CTLs cytotoxic against p53-deleted human prostate cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Gene Ther 24(7): 289-296, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Li YBL,
    2. Li CJ,
    3. Li LJ
    : Key points of basic theories and clinical practice in rAd-p53 (Gendicine™) gene therapy for solid malignant tumors. Expert Opin Biol Ther 15(3): 437-454, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Reprints and Permissions
Effect of Combined Epigenetic Treatments and Ectopic NIS Expression on Undifferentiated Thyroid Cancer Cells
MICHELE MASSIMINO, ELENA TIRRÒ, STEFANIA STELLA, FRANCESCO FRASCA, VERONICA VELLA, LAURA SCIACCA, MARIA STELLA PENNISI, SILVIA RITA VITALE, ADRIANA PUMA, CHIARA ROMANO, LIVIA MANZELLA
Anticancer Research Dec 2018, 38 (12) 6653-6662; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13032
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords