Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Comparison of Primary Tumor Size in Stage I and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

EDGAR PETRU, CAROLA HUBER, EVA SAMPL and JOSEF HAAS
Anticancer Research November 2018, 38 (11) 6507-6511; DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.13015
EDGAR PETRU
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, LKH University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAROLA HUBER
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: carola.huber@stud.medunigraz.at
EVA SAMPL
3Department of Internal Medicine, LKH Kirchdorf, Kirchdorf, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JOSEF HAAS
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, LKH University Hospital Graz, Graz, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Two studies have found primary ovarian carcinomas in stage I disease to be larger than those in stage III. Thus, these stages may represent different tumor entities. Materials and Methods: The clinical data from 553 patients operated on between 1985 and 2012 for epithelial ovarian cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Results: Primary lesions including invasive, borderline and benign components were significantly larger in stage I compared to stage III disease (p<0.001). However, the maximum diameter of invasive components in those with stage III disease were significantly larger than in those with stage I disease (p=0.001). The size of the invasive component was not associated with the largest size of intraperitoneal metastasis. Conclusion: We were only, in part, able to reproduce the data from the two smaller published studies. The prognosis of patients with stage III disease strongly depends on the size of intraperitoneal metastases.

  • Ovarian cancer
  • tumor size
  • metastasis size
  • FIGO stage
  • prognosis

Primary tumors in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I ovarian cancer might be expected to be smaller than those in stage III disease. One study on 110 patients reported tumors in those with FIGO stage I and II disease being significantly larger than those in FIGO stage III and IV (1). Thus, ‘early’ and ‘late’ stage disease might in fact represent different clinical entities.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the primary tumor size in FIGO stage I and III disease in a larger patient population treated at our Institution. If previous findings by Horvath et al. (1) were confirmed, this might have a clinical impact on the diagnosis and treatment of ovarian cancer.

Materials and Methods

In this study, 553 consecutive patients with primary epithelial ovarian cancer in stage I and III disease, operated on between 1985 and 2012 at the University Hospital for Gynecology and Obstetrics in Graz, were identified from the local tumor registry. They were retrospectively analyzed. Patients and disease characteristics are given in Table I. Primary tumors and intraperitoneal metastases were removed surgically in all cases, with the exception of a minority deemed inoperable or anesthetically critical. A chart review was performed and data on macroscopic and microscopic histopathology were extracted (96%). In the remaining 4% in which no resection of metastases was performed, the size of the largest intraperitoneal metastasis was estimated on the basis of the surgical report. The microscopic findings with regard to the size of the primary tumor with its invasive, borderline and benign components were recorded.

Patients had to meet all of the following criteria to be included in this study: Primary epithelial ovarian cancer, FIGO stage I or III disease, primary surgery at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Graz, information on follow-up available.

Patients with at least one of the following criteria were excluded from this study: epithelial ovarian cancer in stage II or IV disease, borderline tumor of the ovary, non-epithelial ovarian cancer (carcinosarcoma, germ cell tumor, malignant stromal tumor), relapsed ovarian cancer, undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, primary surgery at another institution.

Data were evaluated using the statistical program SPSS 15.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago IL, USA). For statistical analysis, a level of α=0.05 was used as the significance limit. A significant difference was stated in cases with a p-value less than 0.05. Survival at 5 and 10 years was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

In our study, significantly more patients had FIGO stage III disease than stage I disease (Table I). Histologically, primary lesions containing invasive, borderline and benign components had a significantly larger maximum diameter in FIGO stage I than in FIGO stage III disease (Figure 1). In contrast, invasive lesions in stage III disease were significantly larger than those in stage I disease (Figure 2).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Tumor and patient profiles for the 553 (100%) patients who were diagnosed with primary epithelial ovarian cancer in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I and III disease.

In FIGO stage I disease, most patients had non-serous tumors (61%), whereas in FIGO stage III disease, mainly serous tumors (65%) were diagnosed. Serous ovarian carcinomas were significantly smaller than those of other histological subtypes. This was shown in both FIGO stage I and III disease for primary lesions, as well as for the respective invasive tumor components (Table I).

In FIGO stage I disease, most patients had grade 1 or grade 2 lesions. In FIGO stage III disease, most lesions were undifferentiated. Similar results have been reported in the literature (2).

Maximum size of intraperitoneal metastasis in ovarian cancer in stage III disease (n=354) is shown in Table I and detailed in Figure 3. The median maximum diameter of metastasis of epithelial ovarian cancer in FIGO stage III disease (n=354) was 5.8 cm (95% confidence interval=5.1-6.6 cm; Table II). There was no correlation between the size of the invasive component of the primary lesion and the intraperitoneal metastasis (Figure 4).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Distribution of the maximum size of the primary lesion of the ovary including invasive, borderline and benign components in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I (n=177) and stage III disease (n=376) (p<0.001).

A larger size of metastasis was associated with the presence of ascites and bowel involvement (data not shown). Retroperitoneal lymphadenectomy was performed more often in patients with smaller intraperitoneal metastases and in those in whom tumor resection to less than 2 cm was achieved.

Overall 5-year survival was significantly higher in patients with stage I than stage III disease (75% vs. 26%, respectively). Similar results were obtained for 10-year survival (72% vs. 17%, respectively). Relapse-free survival was significantly higher in patients with FIGO stage I disease than in those with FIGO stage III disease. In stage I disease, survival was not significantly different between the subgroups according to tumor size (log-rank test: p=0.839) (Figure 5). Similar results were found for FIGO stage III disease (log rank test: p=0.661) (Figure 6).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Distribution of the maximum size of the invasive component of the epithelial ovarian cancer in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I and III disease (n=553) (p=0.001).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Distribution of the maximum size of the largest intraperitoneal metastasis of patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III epithelial ovarian cancer (n=354).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Largest intraperitoneal metastasis in relation to the maximum size of the invasive component of the epithelial ovarian cancer in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III disease (n=354).

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Distribution of the maximum diameter of the largest intraperitoneal metastasis compared to the maximum invasive primary ovarian tumor size in stage III disease (n=354). Note that several carcinomas were only microscopic but were associated with significantly larger intraperitoneal metastases (p=0.003).

Discussion

Primary lesions of ovarian tumors with invasive, borderline and benign components in FIGO stage I disease had a larger median maximum diameter than those in FIGO stage III disease (12.8 vs. 9.7 cm, respectively; p<0.001; Figure 1). In contrast, the median maximum diameter of the invasive tumor component was higher in FIGO stage III disease than that in stage I disease (8.3 vs. 6.7 cm, respectively; p=0.001; Figure 2). Thus, it might be hypothesized that some invasive carcinomas in stage III disease may develop from stage I lesions. This might be caused by the overgrowth of benign or borderline tumor components by more aggressive invasive tumors (3).

Due to the relatively large tumor size in stage I disease, the tumor might have been diagnosed earlier due to earlier occurrence of symptoms, gynecological palpation and ultrasound (4). In stage III disease, the maximum size of the primary lesion differed only slightly from that of the invasive tumor component (9.7 vs. 8.3 cm; not statistically significant; Figures 1 and 2). These data suggest different pathology in stage I and III ovarian cancer. With the help of molecular genetic analyses including rat sarcoma (RAS), B-rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (B-RAF), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) and p53 mutation, additional important characteristics of both tumor entities might be identified (5, 6).

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Overall survival of patients with stage I ovarian cancer based on the maximum size of the invasive tumor component.

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Overall survival in patients with stage III ovarian cancer based on the maximum size of the invasive tumor component.

Horvath et al. reported that primary tumors in FIGO stage I are larger than those in stage III disease (1). We were able to confirm these findings only for primary ovarian lesions including invasive, borderline and benign components. In our series, the invasive tumor components were significantly smaller in FIGO stage I than in FIGO stage III disease (Table I and Figure 2).

The median size of the maximum diameter of intraperitoneal metastasis of the epithelial ovarian cancer in stage III disease was 5.8 cm. There was no correlation between the size of the invasive component of the primary ovarian tumor and the size of intraperitoneal metastases in stage III disease. Regression analysis showed no relationship between the size of the primary ovarian cancer and the size of metastases (Figure 3). This finding confirms previous hypotheses that coelomic epithelium per se represents ‘at risk’ tissue for a widespread neoplastic field giving rise to peritoneal and the more common ovarian or tubal serous type neoplasms. They may represent the origin of malignant transformation and this process may take place independently of the development of primary ovarian cancer (7). Survival analyses of our patient groups are consistent with those reported in the literature (8-12).

In summary, patients with stage I disease had larger primary ovarian lesions than those with stage III disease, mainly due to concomitant non-invasive or benign components. There was no correlation between the invasive primary tumor size and the size of metastases in stage III disease.

Acknowledgements

The Authors express their special appreciation to everybody helping and supporting this study.

  • Received October 2, 2018.
  • Revision received October 15, 2018.
  • Accepted October 17, 2018.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Horvath LE,
    2. Werner T,
    3. Boucher K,
    4. Jones K
    : The relationship between tumor size and stage in early versus advanced ovarian cancer: A retrospective chart review. J Clin Oncol 25: 5580, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Kurman RJ,
    2. Visvanathan K,
    3. Roden R,
    4. Wu TC,
    5. Shih IeM
    : Early detection and treatment of ovarian cancer: Shifting from early stage to minimal volume of disease based on a new model of carcinogenesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198: 349-350, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Winter WE 3rd.,
    2. Maxwell GL,
    3. Tian C,
    4. Carlson JW,
    5. Ozols RF,
    6. Rose PG,
    7. Markman M,
    8. Armstrong DK,
    9. Muggia F,
    10. McGuire WP
    : Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: A Gynecologic Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol 25: 3621-3627, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Aletti GD,
    2. Dowdy SC,
    3. Gostout BS,
    4. Jones MB,
    5. Stanhope CR,
    6. Wilson TO,
    7. Podratz KC,
    8. Cliby WA
    : Aggressive surgical effort and improved survival in advanced-stage ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 107: 77-85, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Vang R,
    2. Levine DA,
    3. Soslow RA,
    4. Zaloudek C,
    5. Shih I-M,
    6. Kurman RJ
    : Molecular alterations of TP53 are a defining feature of ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A rereview of cases lacking TP53 mutations in The Cancer Genome Atlas Ovarian Study. Int J Gynecol Pathol 35: 48-55, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hunter SM,
    2. Anglesio MS,
    3. Ryland GL,
    4. Sharma R,
    5. Chiew Y-E,
    6. Rowley SM,
    7. Doyle MA,
    8. Li J,
    9. Gilks CB,
    10. Moss P,
    11. Allan PE,
    12. Stephens AN,
    13. Huntsman DG,
    14. DeFazio A,
    15. Bowtell DD,
    16. Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group,
    17. Gorringe KL,
    18. Campbell IG
    : Molecular profiling of low-grade serous ovarian tumours identifies novel candidate driver genes. Oncotarget 6: 37663-37677, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Dalrymple JC,
    2. Bannatyne P,
    3. Russell P,
    4. Solomon HJ,
    5. Tattersall MHN,
    6. Atkinson K,
    7. Carter J,
    8. Duval P,
    9. Elliott P,
    10. Friedlander M,
    11. Murray J,
    12. Coppleson M
    : Extraovarian peritoneal serous papillary carcinoma. A clinicopathologic study of 31 cases. Cancer 64: 110-115, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Colombo N,
    2. Van Gorp T,
    3. Parma G,
    4. Amant F,
    5. Gatta G,
    6. Sessa C,
    7. Vergote I
    : Ovarian cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 60: 159-179, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Berkenblit A,
    2. Cannistra SA
    : Advances in the management of epithelial ovarian cancer. J Reprod Med 50: 426-438, 2005.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Allen DG,
    2. Coulter J
    : Survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and the effect of lymphadenectomy in those with stage 3 disease. Obstet Gynaecol 39: 420-424, 1999.
    OpenUrl
    1. Stratton JF,
    2. Pharoah P,
    3. Tidy JA,
    4. Paterson MEL
    : An analysis of ovarian tumor diameter and survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer 10: 449-451, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Tingulstad S,
    2. Skjeldestad FE,
    3. Halvorsen TB,
    4. Hagen B
    : Survival and prognostic factors in patients with ovarian cancer. Obstet Gynecol 101: 885-891, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 38 (11)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 11
November 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Comparison of Primary Tumor Size in Stage I and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Comparison of Primary Tumor Size in Stage I and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
EDGAR PETRU, CAROLA HUBER, EVA SAMPL, JOSEF HAAS
Anticancer Research Nov 2018, 38 (11) 6507-6511; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13015

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Comparison of Primary Tumor Size in Stage I and III Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
EDGAR PETRU, CAROLA HUBER, EVA SAMPL, JOSEF HAAS
Anticancer Research Nov 2018, 38 (11) 6507-6511; DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.13015
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Bone Toxicity Case Report Combining Encorafenib, Cetuximab and WNT974 in a Phase I Trial
  • Assessment of Breakthrough Cancer Pain Among Female Patients With Cancer: Knowledge, Management and Characterization in the IOPS-MS Study
  • Low-dose Apalutamide in Non-metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: A Case Series
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • ovarian cancer
  • tumor size
  • metastasis size
  • FIGO stage
  • prognosis
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire