Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Sphingosine Induces Apoptosis and Down-regulation of MYCN in PAX3–FOXO1-positive Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells Irrespective of TP53 Mutation

EUN HYUN AHN, MICHAEL B. LEE, DONG JOO SEO, JUSEONG LEE, YONGHYUN KIM and KSHITIZ GUPTA
Anticancer Research January 2018, 38 (1) 71-76;

Abstract

Background/Aim: Rhabdomyosarcoma is the most common type of pediatric soft-tissue sarcoma. Among the subsets of this disease, alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) expressing paired box 3 (PAX3) and forkhead box O1 (PAX3–FOXO1) fusion oncoprotein has the worst prognosis. The goal of this study was to investigate the chemotherapeutic effects of sphingosine on PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells [tumor protein p53 (TP53)-mutated RH30 and TP53 wild-type RH18 cells]. Materials and Methods: The proliferation, cell death, apoptosis, cell cycle, and MYCN proto-oncogene (MYCN) expression of RH30 and RH18 cells were determined. Results: Sphingosine inhibited the growth and caused cell death in a dose-dependent manner in both cell lines. Sphingosine triggered cell death by inducing apoptosis without affecting the cell cycle. MYCN expression was down-regulated within 2 and 4 h of sphingosine treatment in both RH30 and RH18 cells. Conclusion: Sphingosine exerts antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects via MYCN down-regulation independently of TP53 mutation status in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) is the most common type of pediatric soft tissue sarcoma and accounts for approximately 50% of all soft-tissue sarcomas (1). RMS occurs predominantly in the sites of skeletal muscle lineage. RMS is categorized into two subtypes based on histological observations (2); embryonal (ERMS) and alveolar (ARMS). Between these two subtypes, ARMS has the worse prognosis and is associated with a higher frequency of metastasis (3, 4). ARMS is characterized by the translocation t(2;13)(q35;q14) or t(1;13)(q36;q14) that lead to paired box 3–forkhead box O1 (PAX3–FOXO1) and paired box 7–forkhead box O1 (PAX7–FOXO1) gene fusions, respectively. PAX3–FOXO1 is present in about 55% of ARMS harboring overexpression of this fusion gene at both RNA and protein levels. PAX7–FOXO1 is present in 22% of ARMS, and the remaining 23% of ARMS is fusion-negative (3, 5). PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS is the most clinically intractable subtype among RMS types (2, 3, 6, 7). Mutation of tumor protein p53 (TP53) is infrequent in RMS, occurring in fewer than 10% of patients (8), and inactive TP53 is more common in fusion-negative RMS (9).

Sphingolipids are practically ubiquitous and are found in all eukaryotic cell membranes, some prokaryotes, and in foods such as dairy and soy products (10, 11). Animal studies showed complex dietary sphingolipids (e.g. sphingomyelin, dihydrosphingomyelin, glucosylceramide, lactosylceramide, and ganglioside GD3), reduced aberrant colonic foci in CF1 mice (12-17) and reduced tumors in all regions of the intestine in multiple intestinal neoplasia (Min) mice with truncated adenomatous polyposis coli (17, 18). These anti-tumorigenic effects of sphingolipids against colon carcinogenesis could be the result of the conversion of complex sphingolipids to sphingolipid metabolites. Sphingolipid metabolites, such as ceramide (acylated form of sphingosine) and sphingoid bases (sphingosine, sphinganine), function as second messengers in various signal transduction pathways to regulate cellular function. For example, sphingolipid metabolites were found to inhibit cell proliferation and induce apoptosis (programmed cell death) in human cancer cells (19-24). Many of these previous studies focused on the effects of ceramide, but a few have examined the action of sphingosine (24, 25). Interestingly, sphingosine is a metabolic precursor to sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P), but the two have opposing action on cells (i.e. induction of apoptosis by sphingosine versus inhibition of apoptosis by S1P, respectively) (25, 26). While it was previously shown that S1P is a prometastatic factor in RMS (27), little is known about the effects of sphingosine, particularly in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS.

In the current study, we examined whether antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of sphingosine in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells would differ according to TP53 mutation status. Previously, we and others identified that the up-regulation of MYCN oncogene at both mRNA and protein levels is a distinguishable feature and a potential direct target of PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS in comparison to ERMS (28-30). Here, we tested whether the regulation of MYCN expression could mediate the effects of sphingosine on proliferation and apoptosis.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and assessment of cell proliferation. RH30 and RH18 ARMS cells expressing PAX3–FOXO1 fusion oncoprotein were provided by Dr. Frederic G. Barr at the National Cancer Institute of the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD, USA). RH30 cells carry mutations in TP53 gene, while RH18 cells exhibit wild-type TP53. RH30 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; HyClone, Logan, UT, USA), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (P/S; Invitrogen) and 1% antibiotic-antimycotic (AM; Invitrogen). RH18 cells were maintained in DMEM with 15% FBS, 1% P/S, and 1% AM. Cell cultures at 80% confluence were trypsinized and cells were seeded at a density of 4×104 per well in 6-well plates and cultured in 2 ml of the appropriate medium (as described above) for 24 hours. The media were then switched to DMEM/1%FBS/1%PS/1%AM and the cells were treated with sphingosine at different concentrations for 1, 3, and 5 days. Total nucleic acid concentrations were determined as described previously (31).

Sphingosine treatment. D-Sphingosine (Cat# S7049; Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was prepared in ethanol as 50 mM stock concentration, kept at −20°C and used only for 2 months. Prior to each experiment, 50 mM sphingosine was freshly diluted in 50% ethanol and delivered to the cells at different concentrations of sphingosine in 0.05% ethanol. Cells treated with 0.05% ethanol served as controls.

RNA extraction and real time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) analysis. Total RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). Corresponding cDNA was synthesized and was quantified by QPCR on a 7900HT Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) as described previously (28). The expression of MYCN gene was normalized to the expression of 18S ribosomal RNA (18S rRNA). The 18S rRNA [Assay ID#: Hs99999901_s1; ThermoFisher Scientific (Applied Biosystems)] Taqman gene-expression assay was used and its sequences are not disclosed by Applied Biosystems. The sequences of the forward and reverse primers and probes for MYCN were reported previously (28).

Cell death, apoptosis, and cell-cycle analysis via flow cytometry. Floating dead cells were collected in FBS (HyClone), and adherent cells were detached using TrypLE Express no Phenol red [ThermoFisher Scientific (Gibco), Carlsbad, CA, USA]. Cells were incubated with calcein AM or propidium iodide (PI) viability dyes (eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA) to distinguish between dead and live cells. Apoptotic cells were detected with annexin V–allophycocyanin (APC) (eBioscience). For cell-cycle analysis, cells were fixed with ethanol and then stained with PI (50 μg/ml) as described previously (31). Cells were then determined via fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) Canto II (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) and the data were quantified using the FlowJo program (Tree Star Inc., Ashland, OR, USA).

Statistical analysis. Data for total nucleic acid assay at different concentrations of sphingosine and multiple culture periods were analyzed by two-way ANOVA. One-way ANOVA was applied for the data of total nucleic acid and cell death analyses at different concentrations of sphingosine for a single culture period (24 hours). After application of two-way ANOVA or one-way ANOVA, the significance of differences in the means between control and treatment groups for specific culture periods was evaluated by multiple comparisons using Holm-Sidak method. Differences between the groups were considered significant at p<0.05, and the analyses were carried out using Sigma plot version 12.0 program (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Results

Sphingosine inhibited cell growth and caused death of PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells. Effects of sphingosine on the growth and death of PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells, RH30 and RH18, were determined using the total nucleic acid assay. RH30 and RH18 cells carry mutated and wild-type TP53 tumor-suppressor gene, respectively (32-34). Total nucleic acids in control RH30 cell cultures doubled within 1 day and increased up to 10-fold in 5 days (Figure 1A). In comparison, total nucleic acids in control RH18 cultures doubled within 3 days and increased up to 3-fold in 5 days (Figure 1B), indicating that RH18 cells grew more slowly than RH30 cells. The cells were treated with sphingosine at different concentrations (0 to 15 μM) for 0-5 days (Figure 1). Sphingosine caused a dose-dependent inhibition of cell growth in both cell lines (Figure 1A and B). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of sphingosine against RH30 and RH18 cells were 3.55 μM (Figure 1C) and 2.66 μM (Figure 1D), respectively.

Figure 1.
Figure 1.

Sphingosine inhibited growth and caused death of RH30 and RH18 cells. A: Sub-confluent RH30 cells were cultured with sphingosine at 0 (○), 1 (●), 2.5 (▿), 5 (▾), 10 (□), and 15 μM (▪) for 1, 3, and 5 days. B: Sub-confluent RH18 cells were cultured with sphingosine at 0 (○), 1 (●), 2.5 (▿), 3.5 (⋄), 5 (▾), and 10 μM (□) for 1, 3, and 5 days. *Means at each time of cells treated with sphingosine at 2.5 to 15 μM differed significantly from the corresponding controls at p<0.001 by two-way ANOVA. C, D: For determination of the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50), RH30 cells (C) and RH18 cells (D) were cultured with sphingosine at different concentrations (1 to 15 μM) for 24 h. *Significantly different at p<0.001 by one-way ANOVA compared to the corresponding control and different sphingosine concentrations. Total nucleic acids were measured as an index of cell number and results are expressed as a percentage of the quantity at zero hour (mean±SEM, n=3, except n=6 for time zero). Where an error bar is not seen, it lies within the dimensions of the symbol.

Sphingosine caused cell death by inducing apoptosis without cell-cycle arrest. Dead cells were detected using PI (Figure 2) and calcein AM (Figure 3) viability dyes via flow cytometry. RH30 and RH18 cells were treated with sphingosine for 12 h at 5 μM and 3.5 μM, respectively (Figure 2). Sphingosine significantly increased the population of dead RH30 cells by about 5-fold and of RH18 cells by 4-fold (Figure 2). In addition, sphingosine significantly increased the percentage of dead RH30 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3).

We further examined whether sphingosine causes the death of PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells by inducing apoptosis. Annexin V-APC-positive cells were quantified to detect apoptotic cells via flow cytometry (Figure 4). Our flow cytometric experiments using annexin V demonstrated that treatment with sphingosine at 5 μM for RH30 cells and 3.5 μM for RH18 cells for 12 h significantly increased the numbers of annexin V-positive apoptotic cells by 5-fold (Figure 4). The effects of sphingosine (3.5 μM for 12 h) on the cell cycle in RH30 cells were also analyzed via flow cytometry. The percentage of RH30 cells in G0/G1, S, and G2/M (mean±SEM) were: control: 40.5±1.0, 38.9±1.4, 18.1±3.2; and sphingosine: 41.2±1.1, 38.7±1.3, 17.3±3.3. This indicates that the induction of apoptosis by sphingosine was independent of cell-cycle arrest, as there were no significant differences in the distribution of cells in G0/G1, S, and G2/M stages between control and the sphingosine treatment.

Sphingosine down-regulated MYCN oncogene expression within 2 hours. We and others previously identified that up-regulation of MYCN expression is a potential therapeutic target of PAX3–FOXO1 in ARMS (28-30). In the current study, we explored whether the regulation of MYCN expression is a mechanism by which sphingosine inhibits growth and induces apoptosis in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells. The cells were treated with sphingosine at the approximate IC50 (3.5 μM for RH30 cells and 2.5 μM for RH18 cells) for 2 and 4 hours. Total RNA was then extracted, converted to cDNA and the expression of MYCN was determined using Taqman QPCR assay (Figure 5). Significant down-regulation of MYCN expression was observed even with 2 hours of sphingosine treatment. At 4 hours of sphingosine treatment, MYCN expression was further reduced by 7-fold in RH30 cells (Figure 5A) and by 1.5-fold in RH18 cells (Figure 5B).

Discussion

Sphingolipids have gained attention as potential chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents against some forms of cancer. Most studies addressed the role of ceramide, an acylated form of sphingolipid metabolites, in the apoptosis of major types of cancer cells (19-22, 24, 35, 36), but the effects of the sphingolipid metabolite sphingosine have been explored to a lesser extent. Furthermore, the effects of sphingolipids on ARMS have not been studied extensively. To our knowledge, currently only two prior studies examined the effects of sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate on RMS cell lines (27, 37). In particular, Phillips et al. (37) demonstrated that sphingosine mediates apoptosis in RMS cell lines.

In the present study, we found that sphingosine inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis without affecting cell-cycle progression in both RH30 and RH18 PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells. Our cell proliferation data indicate that RH30 cells grow faster than RH18 cells. The slower proliferation rate of RH18 cells might be associated with a growth-inhibitory function of the wild-type tumor suppressor gene TP53 (38, 39). Mechanisms by which sphingosine inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in some types of cancer cells have been studied. For example, sphingosine induced apoptosis by repressing AKT activation in colon (31) and liver (40) cancer cells. Previously, we and others identified MYCN as a potential target gene of PAX3–FOXO1 in ARMS (28-30). Here, we examined whether the regulation of MYCN oncogene expression is a potential mechanism by which sphingosine inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells. We demonstrate that sphingosine at IC50 significantly down-regulated MYCN expression within 2 hours, which occurs earlier than significant inhibition of proliferation and induction of apoptosis. Recent studies showed that sphingosine kinase 2 (SK2), which phosphorylates sphingosine to S1P, promoted colon cancer cell proliferation and invasion by enhancing MYC expression (41). Furthermore, pharmacological and siRNA inhibition of SK2 was found to down-regulate MYC (c-Myc) and inhibit growth in multiple myeloma and prostate cancer (42, 43). Since sphingosine and S1P are known to have opposite effects on apoptosis (25, 26), our findings are thus consistent with a mechanism in which sphingosine inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis by down-regulating MYCN expression.

Figure 2.
Figure 2.

Sphingosine induced cell death in RH30 and RH18 cells. Sub-confluent RH30 and RH18 cells were cultured in the absence (Ctr) or the presence of 5 μM or 3.5 μM sphingosine (SO), respectively, for 12 h and were stained with propidium iodide (PI). Dead cells were identified as the PI-positive cell population using flow cytometric analysis (mean±SEM, n=2).

Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Sphingosine induced cell death in RH30 cells. Sub-confluent cells were cultured with sphingosine at different concentrations (2.5, 3.5, and 5 μM) for 12 h and were stained with calcein AM. The percentage of dead cells (calcein AM-negative population) was determined via flow cytometric analysis (mean±SEM, n=3). *Significantly different from the control at p<0.025 by one-way ANOVA. Different superscript letters (a, b, c) indicate significant differences between sphingosine concentrations. Where an error bar is not seen, it lies within the dimensions of the symbol.

Figure 4.
Figure 4.

Sphingosine induced apoptosis of RH30 and RH18 cells. Sub-confluent RH30 and RH18 cells were cultured in the absence (Ctr) or the presence of 5 μM or 3.5 μM sphingosine (SO), respectively, for 12 h and were stained with annexin V (Annx). Apoptotic cells were identified as the annexinV-positive cell populations (Annx+) with flow cytometry (mean±SEM n=2). Where an error bar is not seen, it lies within the dimensions of the symbol.

Figure 5.
Figure 5.

Sphingosine down-regulated the expression of MYCN in RH30 and RH18 cells. Sub-confluent RH30 and RH18 cells were cultured with and without sphingosine (SO) at 3.5 μM and 2.5 μM, respectively, for 2 and 4 h. Total mRNA was isolated and the expression of MYCN gene was determined using Taqman real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction. The relative expression levels of MYCN gene were normalized by 18S rRNA as an endogenous control transcript. Data represent fold changes normalized to the corresponding control at specific times (mean±SD, n=3 for A; n=6 for B). Where an error bar is not seen, it lies within the dimensions of the symbol.

To elucidate potential interactions of MYCN with TP53, we examined effects of sphingosine in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells differing in TP53 status (mutant TP53 versus wild-type). Although MYCN down-regulation was observed in both RH30 and RH18 cells within 2 h, the extent of MYCN down-regulation was greater in RH30 cells than in RH18 cells. We speculate that this might be due to the presence of the wild-type TP53 in RH18 cells. It was reported that MYCN can regulate TP53 transcription, expression, and activation in human neuroblastoma cells (40, 44). For example, high TP53 expression was positively correlated with MYCN expression and amplification in immunohistochemical analysis of neuroblastoma tumors (45). MYCN knockdown reduced TP53 expression in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma cell lines. MYCN bound directly to a motif close to the transcriptional start site within the TP53 promoter (45). Taken together, the different extent of MYCN down-regulation based on the TP53 mutation status in our study implies a feedback mechanism in which wild-type TP53 regulates MYCN expression. Alternatively, sphingosine may induce apoptosis by both TP53-dependent and TP53-independent mechanisms in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS. This may be dependent on the interactions among TP53, MYCN, and other proliferation/ apoptosis-related oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes, as well as the mutation status of these genes. To establish a direct causative relationship for the MYCN down-regulation with sphingosine-induced apoptosis in PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS, future studies could test the effects of sphingosine by overexpressing MYCN in RH30 and RH18 cells to see whether the antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects of sphingosine are attenuated.

Since RMS is often diagnosed in very young children, there is a growing effort to reduce the reliance on radiotherapy when treating RMS in order to avoid any potential long-term side-effects (4). Our data suggest that sphingosine inhibits the growth of PAX3–FOXO1-positive ARMS cells in a dose-dependent manner and is a potent inducer of apoptosis by down-regulating MYCN expression in cells harboring either mutated or wild-type TP53. In conclusion, we provide one of the first findings that sphingosine treatment may be efficacious against ARMS, irrespective of TP53 mutation status.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Eunmi Hur, Prince J. Kim, and Hyun Jung Lee for cell culture assistance. This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (grant no. 2010-0010840) funded by the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology to E.H.A., National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) sponsored University of Washington Center for Exposures, Diseases, Genomics, and Environment and ITHS grant no. NIH/NIEHS P30ES007033 to E.H.A., and University of Washington Office of Research Royalty Research Fund grant to E.H.A.

Footnotes

  • ↵† Present Address: Kyungpook National University, School of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received October 23, 2017.
  • Revision received November 3, 2017.
  • Accepted November 8, 2017.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Egas-Bejar D,
    2. Huh WW
    : Rhabdomyosarcoma in adolescent and young adult patients: current perspectives. Adolesc Health Med Ther 5: 115-125, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Linardic CM
    : PAX3–FOXO1 fusion gene in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Lett 270(1): 10-18, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Sorensen PH,
    2. Lynch JC,
    3. Qualman SJ,
    4. Tirabosco R,
    5. Lim JF,
    6. Maurer HM,
    7. Bridge JA,
    8. Crist WM,
    9. Triche TJ,
    10. Barr FG
    : PAX3–FKHR and PAX7–FKHR gene fusions are prognostic indicators in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma: a report from the children's oncology group. J Clin Oncol 20(11): 2672-2679, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Stevens MC
    : Treatment for childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: the cost of cure. Lancet Oncol 6(2): 77-84, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Davis RJ,
    2. Barr FG
    : Fusion genes resulting from alternative chromosomal translocations are overexpressed by gene-specific mechanisms in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94(15): 8047-8051, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Kelly KM,
    2. Womer RB,
    3. Sorensen PH,
    4. Xiong QB,
    5. Barr FG
    : Common and variant gene fusions predict distinct clinical phenotypes in rhabdomyosarcoma. J Clin Oncol 15(5): 1831-1836, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Anderson J,
    2. Gordon T,
    3. McManus A,
    4. Mapp T,
    5. Gould S,
    6. Kelsey A,
    7. McDowell H,
    8. Pinkerton R,
    9. Shipley J,
    10. Pritchard-Jones K
    : Detection of the PAX3–FKHR fusion gene in paediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: a reproducible predictor of outcome? Br J Cancer 85(6): 831-835, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Van Maerken T,
    2. Rihani A,
    3. Van Goethem A,
    4. De Paepe A,
    5. Speleman F,
    6. Vandesompele J
    : Pharmacologic activation of wild-type p53 by nutlin therapy in childhood cancer. Cancer Lett 344(2): 157-165, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Monti E,
    2. Fanzani A
    : Uncovering metabolism in rhabdomyosarcoma. Cell Cycle 15(2): 184-195, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ahn E,
    2. Schroeder J
    : Bioactive sphingolipids are constituents of soy and dairy products. J Food Sci 67(2): 522-524, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  11. ↵
    1. Vesper H,
    2. Schmelz EM,
    3. Nikolova-Karakashian MN,
    4. Dillehay DL,
    5. Lynch DV,
    6. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Sphingolipids in food and the emerging importance of sphingolipids to nutrition. J Nutr 129(7): 1239-1250, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Dillehay DL,
    2. Webb SK,
    3. Schmelz EM,
    4. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Dietary sphingomyelin inhibits 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer in CF1 mice. J Nutr 124(5): 615-620, 1994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Schmelz EM,
    2. Bushnev AS,
    3. Dillehay DL,
    4. Liotta DC,
    5. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Suppression of aberrant colonic crypt foci by synthetic sphingomyelins with saturated or unsaturated sphingoid base backbones. Nutr Cancer 28(1): 81-85, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schmelz EM,
    2. Dillehay DL,
    3. Webb SK,
    4. Reiter A,
    5. Adams J,
    6. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Sphingomyelin consumption suppresses aberrant colonic crypt foci and increases the proportion of adenomas versus adenocarcinomas in CF1 mice treated with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine: implications for dietary sphingolipids and colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Res 56(21): 4936-4941, 1996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Schmelz EM,
    2. Sullards MC,
    3. Dillehay DL,
    4. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Colonic cell proliferation and aberrant crypt foci formation are inhibited by dairy glycosphingolipids in 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-treated CF1 mice. J Nutr 130(3): 522-527, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lemonnier LA,
    2. Dillehay DL,
    3. Vespremi MJ,
    4. Abrams J,
    5. Brody E,
    6. Schmelz EM
    : Sphingomyelin in the suppression of colon tumors: prevention versus intervention. Arch Biochem Biophys 419(2): 129-138, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Symolon H,
    2. Schmelz EM,
    3. Dillehay DL,
    4. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Dietary soy sphingolipids suppress tumorigenesis and gene expression in 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-treated CF1 mice and ApcMin/+ mice. J Nutr 134(5): 1157-1161, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Schmelz EM,
    2. Roberts PC,
    3. Kustin EM,
    4. Lemonnier LA,
    5. Sullards MC,
    6. Dillehay DL,
    7. Merrill AH Jr..
    : Modulation of intracellular beta-catenin localization and intestinal tumorigenesis in vivo and in vitro by sphingolipids. Cancer Res 61(18): 6723-6729, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Ahn EH,
    2. Schroeder JJ
    : Sphingoid bases and ceramide induce apoptosis in HT-29 and HCT-116 human colon cancer cells. Exp Biol Med 227(5): 345-353, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Sweeney EA,
    2. Sakakura C,
    3. Shirahama T,
    4. Masamune A,
    5. Ohta H,
    6. Hakomori S,
    7. Igarashi Y
    : Sphingosine and its methylated derivative N,N-dimethylsphingosine (DMS) induce apoptosis in a variety of human cancer cell lines. Int J Cancer 66(3): 358-366, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cai Z,
    2. Bettaieb A,
    3. Mahdani NE,
    4. Legres LG,
    5. Stancou R,
    6. Masliah J,
    7. Chouaib S
    : Alteration of the sphingomyelin/ceramide pathway is associated with resistance of human breast carcinoma MCF7 cells to tumor necrosis factor-alpha-mediated cytotoxicity. J Biol Chem 272(11): 6918-6926, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Gill ZP,
    2. Perks CM,
    3. Newcomb PV,
    4. Holly JM
    : Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein (IGFBP-3) predisposes breast cancer cells to programmed cell death in a non-IGF-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 272(41): 25602-25607, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ahn EH,
    2. Chang CC,
    3. Schroeder JJ
    : Evaluation of sphinganine and sphingosine as human breast cancer chemotherapeutic and chemopreventive agents. Exp Biol Med 231(10): 1664-1672, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ahn EH,
    2. Schroeder JJ
    : Induction of apoptosis by sphingosine, sphinganine, and C(2)-ceramide in human colon cancer cells, but not by C(2)-dihydroceramide. Anticancer Res 30(7): 2881-2884, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Taha TA,
    2. Mullen TD,
    3. Obeid LM
    : A house divided: ceramide, sphingosine, and sphingosine-1-phosphate in programmed cell death. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758(12): 2027-2036, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Spiegel S,
    2. Milstien S
    : Sphingosine 1-phosphate, a key cell signaling molecule. J Biol Chem 277(29): 25851-25854, 2002.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Schneider G,
    2. Bryndza E,
    3. Abdel-Latif A,
    4. Ratajczak J,
    5. Maj M,
    6. Tarnowski M,
    7. Klyachkin YM,
    8. Houghton P,
    9. Morris AJ,
    10. Vater A,
    11. Klussmann S,
    12. Kucia M,
    13. Ratajczak MZ
    : Bioactive lipids S1P and C1P are prometastatic factors in human rhabdomyosarcoma, and their tissue levels increase in response to radio/chemotherapy. Mol Cancer Res 11(7): 793-807, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Ahn EH
    : Regulation of target genes of PAX3–FOXO1 in alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma. Anticancer Res 33(5): 2029-2035, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Davicioni E,
    2. Finckenstein FG,
    3. Shahbazian V,
    4. Buckley JD,
    5. Triche TJ,
    6. Anderson MJ
    : Identification of a PAX–FKHR gene expression signature that defines molecular classes and determines the prognosis of alveolar rhabdomyosarcomas. Cancer Res 66(14): 6936-6946, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Mercado GE,
    2. Xia SJ,
    3. Zhang C,
    4. Ahn EH,
    5. Gustafson DM,
    6. Lae M,
    7. Ladanyi M,
    8. Barr FG
    : Identification of PAX3–FKHR-regulated genes differentially expressed between alveolar and embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: focus on MYCN as a biologically relevant target. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 47(6): 510-520, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Ahn EH,
    2. Schroeder JJ
    : Sphinganine causes early activation of JNK and p38 MAPK and inhibition of AKT activation in HT-29 human colon cancer cells. Anticancer Res 26(1A): 121-127, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Barlow JW,
    2. Wiley JC,
    3. Mous M,
    4. Narendran A,
    5. Gee MF,
    6. Goldberg M,
    7. Sexsmith E,
    8. Malkin D
    : Differentiation of rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines using retinoic acid. Pediatr Blood Cancer 47(6): 773-784, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Taylor AC,
    2. Shu L,
    3. Danks MK,
    4. Poquette CA,
    5. Shetty S,
    6. Thayer MJ,
    7. Houghton PJ,
    8. Harris LC
    : p53 mutation and MDM2 amplification frequency in pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma tumors and cell lines. Med Pediatr Oncol 35(2): 96-103, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Felix CA,
    2. Kappel CC,
    3. Mitsudomi T,
    4. Nau MM,
    5. Tsokos M,
    6. Crouch GD,
    7. Nisen PD,
    8. Winick NJ,
    9. Helman LJ
    : Frequency and diversity of p53 mutations in childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. Cancer Res 52(8): 2243-2247, 1992.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Paschall AV,
    2. Zimmerman MA,
    3. Torres CM,
    4. Yang D,
    5. Chen MR,
    6. Li X,
    7. Bieberich E,
    8. Bai A,
    9. Bielawski J,
    10. Bielawska A,
    11. Liu K
    : Ceramide targets xIAP and cIAP1 to sensitize metastatic colon and breast cancer cells to apoptosis induction to suppress tumor progression. BMC Cancer 14: 24, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Jin Z,
    2. Zheng L,
    3. Xin X,
    4. Li Y,
    5. Hua T,
    6. Wu T,
    7. Wang H
    : Upregulation of forkhead box O3 transcription is involved in C2-ceramide induced apoptosis and autophagy in ovarian cancer cells in vitro. Mol Med Rep 10(6): 3099-3105, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Phillips DC,
    2. Martin S,
    3. Doyle BT,
    4. Houghton JA
    : Sphingosine-induced apoptosis in rhabdomyosarcoma cell lines is dependent on pre-mitochondrial BAX activation and post-mitochondrial caspases. Cancer Res 67(2): 756-764, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Buttgereit P,
    2. Schakowski F,
    3. Marten A,
    4. Brand K,
    5. Renoth S,
    6. Ziske C,
    7. Schottker B,
    8. Ebert O,
    9. Schroers R,
    10. Schmidt-Wolf IG
    : Effects of adenoviral wild-type p53 gene transfer in p53-mutated lymphoma cells. Cancer Gene Ther 8(6): 430-439, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Goldstein I,
    2. Marcel V,
    3. Olivier M,
    4. Oren M,
    5. Rotter V,
    6. Hainaut P
    : Understanding wild-type and mutant p53 activities in human cancer: new landmarks on the way to targeted therapies. Cancer Gene Ther 18(1): 2-11, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Chang HC,
    2. Tsai LH,
    3. Chuang LY,
    4. Hung WC
    : Role of AKT kinase in sphingosine-induced apoptosis in human hepatoma cells. J Cell Physiol 188(2): 188-193, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Zhang L,
    2. Liu X,
    3. Zuo Z,
    4. Hao C,
    5. Ma Y
    : Sphingosine kinase 2 promotes colorectal cancer cell proliferation and invasion by enhancing MYC expression. Tumour Biol 37(6): 8455-8460, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Schrecengost RS,
    2. Keller SN,
    3. Schiewer MJ,
    4. Knudsen KE,
    5. Smith CD
    : Downregulation of critical oncogenes by the selective SK2 inhibitor ABC294640 hinders prostate cancer progression. Mol Cancer Res 13(12): 1591-1601, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Venkata JK,
    2. An N,
    3. Stuart R,
    4. Costa LJ,
    5. Cai H,
    6. Coker W,
    7. Song JH,
    8. Gibbs K,
    9. Matson T,
    10. Garrett-Mayer E,
    11. Wan Z,
    12. Ogretmen B,
    13. Smith C,
    14. Kang Y
    : Inhibition of sphingosine kinase 2 down-regulates the expression of c-Myc and Mcl-1 and induces apoptosis in multiple myeloma. Blood 124(12): 1915-1925, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Petroni M,
    2. Veschi V,
    3. Prodosmo A,
    4. Rinaldo C,
    5. Massimi I,
    6. Carbonari M,
    7. Dominici C,
    8. McDowell HP,
    9. Rinaldi C,
    10. Screpanti I,
    11. Frati L,
    12. Bartolazzi A,
    13. Gulino A,
    14. Soddu S,
    15. Giannini G
    : MYCN sensitizes human neuroblastoma to apoptosis by HIPK2 activation through a DNA damage response. Mol Cancer Res 9(1): 67-77, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Iraci N,
    3. Gherardi S,
    4. Gamble LD,
    5. Wood KM,
    6. Perini G,
    7. Lunec J,
    8. Tweddle DA
    : p53 is a direct transcriptional target of MYCN in neuroblastoma. Cancer Res 70(4): 1377-1388, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools
Reprints and Permissions
Sphingosine Induces Apoptosis and Down-regulation of MYCN in PAX3–FOXO1-positive Alveolar Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells Irrespective of TP53 Mutation
EUN HYUN AHN, MICHAEL B. LEE, DONG JOO SEO, JUSEONG LEE, YONGHYUN KIM, KSHITIZ GUPTA
Anticancer Research Jan 2018, 38 (1) 71-76;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo

Jump to section

Keywords