Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Prognostic Significance of Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A Expression in Patients with Right- or Left-sided Colorectal Cancer

TAKEFUMI KATSUKI, YOSHIFUMI NAKAYAMA, MASAKI AKIYAMA, YUSUKE SAWATSUBASHI, JUN NAGATA, NORITAKA MINAGAWA, TAKAYUKI TORIGOE, HIROTO IZUMI, KIMITOSHI KOHONO and KEIJI HIRATA
Anticancer Research January 2018, 38 (1) 569-575;
TAKEFUMI KATSUKI
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIFUMI NAKAYAMA
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Wakamatsu Hospital of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: nakayama{at}med.uoeh-u.ac.jp
MASAKI AKIYAMA
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Wakamatsu Hospital of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUSUKE SAWATSUBASHI
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Wakamatsu Hospital of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUN NAGATA
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
2Department of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Wakamatsu Hospital of University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORITAKA MINAGAWA
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAYUKI TORIGOE
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROTO IZUMI
3Department of Occupational Pneumology, Institute of Industrial Ecological Science, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIMITOSHI KOHONO
4Asahi Matsumoto Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEIJI HIRATA
1Department of Surgery 1, School of Medicine, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) is necessary for both the transcription and maintenance of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). The present study investigated the clinical significance of mtTFA in patients with right- and left-sided colorectal cancer (CRC). Patients and Methods: Surgical specimens from 237 CRC patients were immunohistochemically stained with polyclonal anti-mtTFA antibody. The relationships among the mtTFA expression, clinicopathological factors and prognosis were evaluated. Results: Thirty-five (60.3%) of 58 right-sided CRC patients and 82 (45.8%) of 179 left-sided CRC patients showed high mtTFA expression. The mtTFA expression significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, the TNM stage and lymphatic invasion in left-sided CRC patients and did not correlate with any factors in right-sided CRC patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed the mtTFA expression to be a significant prognostic factor in left-sided CRC patients but not in right-sided CRC patients. Conclusion: These results suggest that a high mtTFA expression is a useful marker for tumor progression and a poor prognosis in left-sided CRC patients.

  • Mitochondrial transcription factor A
  • colorectal cancer
  • mitochondrial DNA

In Japan, colorectal cancer (CRC) was estimated to be the most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths in females and the third-most frequent cause of cancer related deaths in males in 2014 (1). CRC is also one of the most lethal cancers in the world. With recent advances in chemotherapy, the overall survival of metastatic CRC has improved compared to 10 years ago. However, the prognosis of CRC still remains relatively poor. Therefore, the identification of prognostic factors that can select CRC patients at high risk for recurrence and that can predict chemosensitivity are needed.

The right-sided segment of the large bowel, including the appendix, cecum, ascending colon and transverse colon, arises from the embryonic midgut and receives blood flow from the superior mesenteric artery. In contrast, the left-sided segment of the large bowel from the splenic flexure to the upper anal canal arises from the embryonic hindgut and receives blood flow from the inferior mesenteric artery. This gives rise to differences in the clinicopathologic, cytogenetic and molecular features between right- and left-sided CRC (2). Microsatellite instability (MSI) and chromosomal instability (CIN) are the two most frequently mentioned of these genetic differences. MSI-high tumors have been reported to be more frequent in right-sided CRC (3-5), while CIN has been reported to be more frequent in the left-sided CRC (3-5). CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) results from hypermethylation of cytosine at the CpG island in the gene promoter, which leads to tumor suppressor gene silencing and carcinogenesis. CIMP was found to be significantly associated with right-sided CRC (6), and independently associated with a markedly poor prognosis in overall CRC patients (7).

Mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) is a member of the high mobility group (HMG)-box protein family (8) and stimulates the transcription of mitochondrial genes by binding to the mitochondrial displacement loop (D-loop) region (9, 10). mtTFA is involved in not only the transcription of mtDNA but also in its replication, recognition of mtDNA damage, stabilization of mtDNA and, indirectly, in the repair of mtDNA (11).

Several clinical studies have examined the status of the mtTFA expression in endometrioid adenocarcinoma (12, 13), CRC (14) and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (15, 16). Our previous study in a small population indicated that high mtTFA expression in CRC significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and advanced TNM staging. The survival of patients with high mtTFA expression was significantly worse than that of patients with low mtTFA expression. High mtTFA expression seems to be a useful marker for tumor progression and a poor prognosis in patients with CRC (14).

However, the significance of mtTFA expression in right- and left-sided CRC patients has not yet been evaluated. Therefore, the present study investigated the difference in the clinical significance of mtTFA expression between right- and left-sided CRC patients.

Patients and Methods

Patients. A total of 58 right-sided CRC patients and 179 left-sided CRC patients who underwent surgery at the Department of Surgery 1, University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health (UOEH), Japan, from 1997 to 2003 were recruited to this study. All of the intended procedures in the present study, including the use of specimens from human subjects, were approved by the Ethics Committee of UOEH. The clinical data of these patients are summarized in Table I. No patients had received chemotherapy or radiotherapy before surgery. The clinicopathological findings were determined according to the UICC tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications (17).

Anti-mtTFA antibody. Regarding the immunohistochemical staining of mtTFA, the anti-mtTFA polyclonal antibody was generated by multiple immunizations of a New Zealand white rabbit using synthetic peptides, as described previously (18). This antibody has been described in previous manuscripts (13, 14, 16).

Immunohistochemical staining of mtTFA and the evaluation of mtTFA. Immunohistochemical staining of mtTFA was performed on formalin-fixed 2-μm sections of tissues embedded in paraffin. These sections were deparaffinized in xylene and then rehydrated. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase in methanol for 10 min. After washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the sections were preincubated with 10% rabbit serum albumin in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. The slides were then incubated with the anti-mtTFA antibody for 2 h at room temperature (dilution 1:400). Antibody binding was visualized using the EnVision+ Dual link system with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen (Dako Cytomation, Kyoto, Japan). The slides were counterstained with methyl green and mounted. Immunostained slides were analyzed independently by two researchers. Differences were resolved by simultaneous viewing. The expression of mtTFA in the CRC samples was evaluated according to the methods previously described (13, 14). The cases were judged as “(−)” or “(±)” when no immunostaining was identified or when only minimal occasional staining (<5%) was present, respectively, focally positive (+) when staining of at least 5% but less than 50% of the tumor cells showed immunoreactivity, and diffusely positive (++) when at least 50% of the tumor cells showed immunoreactivity. Finally, the cases were classified into two groups based on low (− or ±) or high (+ or ++) expression.

Immunohistochemical staining of ssDNA and the evaluation of the apoptotic Index. Immunohistochemical staining of single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) was performed on formalin-fixed 2-μm sections of tissues embedded in paraffin. These sections were deparaffinized in xylene and then rehydrated. After endogenous peroxidase was blocked, the sections were preincubated with 10% goat serum albumin in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. The slides were then incubated with the ssDNA antibody (IBL, Gunma Japan) for 60 min at a room temperature (dilution, 1:100). Antibody binding was visualized using the EnVision+ Rabbit/IIRP (Dako Cytomation) with diaminobenzidine as the chromogen. The slides were counterstained with Mayer hematoxylin and mounted. ssDNA staining was evaluated in each section by counting the frequency of labeled cells in 5 high-power fields containing 100 tumor cells each. The apoptotic index (AI) was defined as the percentage of tumor cells with nuclei immunoreactivity among the total tumor cells.

Immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 and the evaluation of the MIB-1 index. Immunohistochemical staining of Ki-67 was performed on formalin-fixed 2-μm sections of tissues embedded in paraffin. These sections were deparaffinized in xylene and then rehydrated. After endogenous peroxidase was blocked, the slides were subjected to microwave treatment in 10mM citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 10 min. After washing with PBS, the sections were preincubated with 10% rabbit serum albumin in PBS for 10 min at room temperature. Immunohistochemical staining for Ki-67 antigen was performed using a monoclonal mouse anti-human Ki-67 antibody Clone MIB-1 (Dako Japan). The slides were then incubated with Ki-67 antibody for 1 h at room temperature (dilution 1:50). After washing with PBS, the slides were treated with anti-mouse immunoglobulin for 20 min and were then incubated with streptavidin-biotinylated horseradish peroxidase complex (LSAB kit/HRP: Nichirei, Tokyo, Japan) for 10 min. The slides were incubated in PBS containing diaminobenzidine and 1% hydrogen peroxidase for 10 min, counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin, and mounted (19). The proliferative activity of the tumor cells was assessed by the MIB-1 index, which was determined as the percentage of tumor cells showing positive staining of nuclei reactive among the total tumor cells counted (19).

Clinicopathological assessment. The tumors were staged by two pathologists who had no prior knowledge of the results of the assays, according to the UICC tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classifications 7th edition (17). Clinicopathological factors such as age, gender, tumor size, histological type, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis and staging were analyzed for their association with the mtTFA expression.

Statistical analyses. The relationships between the parameters were also assessed statistically using the c2 test with the Stat View-J software package (version 5.0, SAS institute, Inc., Cary, NC, USA). The Kaplan-Meier method was applied to determine the survival, and statistical significance was calculated using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the survival were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical significance was established at the p≤0.05 level.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunohistochemical staining of mtTFA in normal colonic mucosa (×400).

Results

Table I shows the profiles of the 237 patients diagnosed with primary right-sided (58) and left-sided (179) CRC recruited for the present study. Immunohistochemical staining of endogenous mtTFA was performed on 58 right-sided and 179 left-sided CRC specimens. The expression of mtTFA was observed in the cytoplasm of the normal colonic mucosa (Figure 1). Positive signals (++) for mtTFA were observed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells (Figure 2A). Negative signals (−) for mtTFA were observed in the cytoplasm of cancer cells (Figure 2B). Thirty-five (60.3%) of the 58 right-sided CRC patients and 82 (45.8%) of the 179 left-sided CRC patients had high mtTFA expression.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Immunohistochemical staining of mtTFA in colorectal cancer specimens. Positive expression (++) of mtTFA (A) and negative expression (−) of mtTFA (B) (×400).

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

The prognostic significance of mtTFA expression was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method in the patients with right-sided CRC (n=58) (A) and left-sided CRC (n=179) (B). The patients were divided into low and high groups according to the previous classification (14). The patients in the low mtTFA (mtTFA-L) group showed a significantly better prognosis in comparison to those in the high mtTFA (mtTFA-H) group in the patients with left-sided CRC (p=0.0143) (B) but not in the patients with right-sided CRC ((p=0.2018) (A).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of the patients with right-sided or left-sided colorectal cancer.

The patients were divided into high- and low-MI groups, with the mean value of 43.6% as the cut-off value. A total of 125 patients (27 right-sided CRCs, 98 left-sided CRCs) had a high-MI, and 112 (31 right-sided CRCs, 81 left-sided CRCs) had a low-MI. The patients were also divided into high- and low-AI groups, with the mean value of 5.1% as the cut-off value. A total 124 patients (40 right-sided CRCs, 84 left-sided CRCs) had a high-AI, and 113 patients (18 right-sided CRCs, 95 left-sided CRCs) had a low-AI.

Based on the evaluation of the mtTFA immunostaining, the mtTFA expression significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage and lymphatic invasion in left-sided CRC patients (Table II). In contrast, the mtTFA expression did not correlate with any factors in right-sided CRC patients (Table II).

Kaplan-Meier analyses for the overall survival based on the mtTFA expression were also performed (Figure 3). The median follow-up time was 93.06 months (range=1.0-185 months). The survival of patients with low mtTFA expression was not significantly better than that of those with high mtTFA expression (p=0.2018, Figure 3A) in right-sided CRC patients. However, the survival of patients with low mtTFA expression was significantly better than that of those with high mtTFA expression (p=0.0143, Figure 3B) in left-sided CRC patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Association between mtTFA expression and clinicopathological factors, A. I. and M. I. in the patients with right- or left-sided colorectal cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate analysis for clinicopathological factors, apoptotic index, MIB-1 index and the expression of mtTFA in the patients with right-sided or left-sided colorectal cancer.

In right-sided CRC patients, a univariate analysis indicated that the TNM stage, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion and histological type were significant prognostic factors (Table III), and a multivariate analysis indicated that the depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were significant independent prognostic factors (Table IV). In contrast, in left-sided CRC patients, a univariate analysis indicated that the TNM stage, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, vessel invasion, histological type, MIB-1 index, apoptotic index, tumor size and the mtTFA expression were significant prognostic factors (Table III) and a multivariate analysis indicated that lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, vessel invasion, MIB-1 index and the mtTFA expression were significant independent prognostic factors (Table IV).

Discussion

The findings regarding the prognosis of right-sided versus left-sided colorectal cancer are conflicting at present. Some studies have revealed a poor survival with a right-sided primary tumor location (20-24), while others have revealed poor or a similar survival based on a left-sided primary tumor location (25, 26). As the criteria for the recruitment of patients differ among these previous manuscripts, it may be difficult to evaluate and compare the results of these reports. While some studies evaluated the patients with Stage I-III disease (25, 26), other studies evaluated those with Stage I-IV (20, 21, 23). Furthermore, some studies have evaluated patients with colon cancer (20, 21, 25), while others have evaluated those with colorectal cancer (26, 27). In our study, there was no significant differences in the survival between right- and left-sided CRC patients (p=0.7504) including Stage I-IV disease. It is important to clarify the differences in prognostic factors or factors predictive of the therapeutic effect based on the location of CRC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Multivariate analysis for clinicopathological factors, apoptotic index, MIB-1 index and the expression of mtTFA in the patients with right-sided or left-sided colorectal cancer.

Several reports have shown that a high mtTFA expression correlates with a worse prognosis by affecting tumor progression. In patients with endometrioid adenocarcinomas, the mtTFA expression was found to be significantly associated with the surgical stage, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, cervical invasion and lymph node metastasis (13). In addition, this previous study indicated that the 10-year overall survival rate of the endometrioid adenocarcinoma patients with a high mtTFA expression was significantly worse than that of patients with a low mtTFA expression by a univariate, but not a multivariate, survival analysis (13). In pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Yamauchi et al. indicated that the mtTFA expression played a pivotal role in worsening the postoperative clinical course through the induction of anti-apoptotic effects in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells (15). Other reports have indicated that the combination of mtTFA and survivin expression is an independent, novel and powerful marker for a poor prognosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients after surgery (16). Our previous small-scale study indicated that the survival of CRC patients with a high mtTFA expression was significantly worse than that of patients with a low mtTFA expression (14). In the present study, our data suggested that a high mtTFA expression might be a useful marker for tumor progression and a poor prognosis in left-sided CRC patients, but not in right-sided CRC patients.

Some studies have described the regulatory mechanism for the expression of mtTFA (28-33). An in vivo genomic footprinting study suggested that NRF-2 and Sp1 are probably involved in the regulation of the mtTFA gene in rat hepatoma (28). The in vitro methylation of the NRF-1 binding site suppressed the promoter activity of mtTFA (29). The overexpression of PGC-1 related coactivator (PRC) in oncocytic tumors induced mitochondrial biogenesis through NRF-1, resulting in an increase in mtTFA and mtDNA transcript levels (30). Another study described the redox regulation of NRF-1 phosphorylation and nuclear translocation by phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate kinase/AKt signaling, which controls the mtTFA induction by an anti-oxidant pro-survival network (31). Also, arsenic causes several human cancers. Chronic exposure to arsenic causes the increased cell survival, DNA damage and increased expression of mtTFA in human prostate epithelial cells (32). The expression of cytochrome c oxygen, mtTFA, NRF-1 and PGC-1apfha was increased in arsenic-induced Bowen's disease (33). The regulatory mechanism for mtTFA is not fully understood. However, the regulation of the mtTFA expression may be important as CRC patients with a low mtTFA expression have a favorable prognosis. More extensive studies about the regulation of mtTFA are needed.

Kurita et al. indicated that cellular expression of the antiapoptotic factor BCL2L1 was down-regulated following the transfection of siRNA knockdown of mtTFA in ovarian cancer cell lines (34). In addition, BCL2L1 promoter activity was increased after the transfection of a mtTFA expression plasmid but decreased after siRNA knockdown of mtTFA (34). mtTFA also regulates the BCL2L1 gene expression in ovarian cancer. Furthermore, increased apoptosis is observed in mtTFA-knockout mice, suggesting that mtTFA plays an important role in apoptosis (35). These studies suggested that mtTFA might be a molecular target of cancer therapy. The strong expression of mtTFA in patients with metastatic CRC was detected in 8 of 33 complete response/partial response patients (24.2%) and 18 of 26 stable disease/progressive disease patients (69.2%), indicating that mtTFA expression was significantly correlated with the response to chemotherapy (p<0.01) (36). The median overall survival of metastatic CRCs was significantly longer in patients without mtTFA expression than in those with it (36). This report suggested that the immunohistochemical study of mtTFA may be useful for predicting the clinical outcome of metastatic CRC patients treated with the FOLFOX regimen.

In conclusion, we found that a high mtTFA expression in tumor specimens may be a useful marker for both the progression of the tumors and for a poor prognosis of patients with left-sided CRC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank Ms. Yuko Ueda for her technical assistance. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science and Culture of Japan.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

  • Received September 29, 2017.
  • Revision received October 17, 2017.
  • Accepted October 18, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Center for cancer control and information services, National cancer center, Japan
    : Vital statistics Japan (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), 2016.
  2. ↵
    1. Bufill JA
    : Colorectal cancer. evidence for distinct genetic categories based on proximal and distal tumor location. Ann Intern Med 113: 779-788, 1990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Markowitz SD,
    2. Bertagnolli MM
    : Molecular origins of cancers: molecular basis of colorectal cancer. N Eng J Med 361: 2449-2460, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pritchard CC,
    2. Grady WM
    : Colorectal cancer molecular biology moves into clinical practice. Gut 60: 116-129, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Gervaz P,
    2. Bucher P,
    3. Morel P
    : Two colons- two cancers: paradigm shift and clinical implications. J Surg Oncol 88: 261-266, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Barault L,
    2. Charon-Barra C,
    3. Jooste V,
    4. Funes de la Vega M,
    5. Martin L,
    6. Roignot P,
    7. Rat P,
    8. Bouvier AM,
    9. Laurent-Puig P,
    10. Faivre J,
    11. Chapusot C,
    12. Piaed F
    : Hypermethylator phenotype in sporadic colon cancer: study on a population-based series of 582 cases. Cancer Res 68: 8541-8546, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Juo YY,
    2. Johnston FM,
    3. Zhang DY,
    4. Juo HH,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Pappou EP,
    7. Yu T,
    8. Easwaran H,
    9. Baylin S,
    10. van Engeland M,
    11. Ahuja N
    : Prognostic value of CpG island methylatior phenotype among colorectal cancer patients: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol 25: 2314-2327, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Parisi MA,
    2. Clayton DA
    : Similarity of human mitochondrial transcription factor 1 to high mobility group proteins. Science 252: 965-969, 1991.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Larsson NG,
    2. Wanf J,
    3. Wilhelmsson H,
    4. Oldfors A,
    5. Rustin P,
    6. Lewandoski M,
    7. Barsh G,
    8. Clayton DA
    : Mitochondrial transcription factor A is necessary for mtDNA maintenance and embryogenesis in mice. Nat Genet 18: 231-236, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Wallberg M,
    2. Clayon DA
    : Sequence and properties of the human KB cell and mouseL cell D-loop regions of mitochondrial DNA. Nucleic Acid Res 9: 5411-5421, 1981.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gaspari M,
    2. Lasson NG,
    3. Gustafsson CM
    : The transcriptional machinery in mammalian mitochondria. Biochem Biophys Acta 1659: 148-152, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Cormio A,
    2. Cuerra F,
    3. Cormio G,
    4. Pesce V,
    5. Fracasso F,
    6. Loizzi V,
    7. Cantatore P,
    8. Selvaggi L,
    9. Gadaleta MN
    : The PGC-1 a-dependent pathway of mitochondrial biogenesisi is upregulated in type I endometrial cancer. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 390: 1182-1185, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Toki N,
    2. Kagami S,
    3. Kurita T,
    4. Kawagoe T,
    5. Matsuura Y,
    6. Hachisuga T,
    7. Matsuyama A,
    8. Hashimoto H,
    9. Izumi H,
    10. Kohno K
    : Expression of mitochondrial transcription factor A in endometrial carcinomas: clinicopathologic correlations and prognostic significance. Virchows Arch 456: 387-393, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Nakayama Y,
    2. Yamauchi M,
    3. Minagawa N,
    4. Tarigoe T,
    5. Izumi H,
    6. Kohno K,
    7. Yamaguchi K
    : Clinical significance of mitochondrial transcription fantor A expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep 27: 1325-1330, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Yamauchi M,
    2. Nakayama Y,
    3. Minagawa N,
    4. Torigoe T,
    5. Shibao K,
    6. Yamaguchi K
    : Mitochondrial transcription factor A worsen the clinical course of patients with pancreatic cancer through inhibition of apoptosis of cancer cells. Pancreas 43: 405-410, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Kimura T,
    2. Kitada S,
    3. Uramoto H,
    4. Zhi L,
    5. Kawatsu Y,
    6. Takeda T,
    7. Horiw S,
    8. Nabeshima A,
    9. Nogichi H,
    10. Sasaguri Y,
    11. Izumi H,
    12. Kohno K,
    13. Yamada S
    : The combination of strong immunohistochemical mtTFA expression and a high surviving index predicts a shorter disease-specific survival in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Histol Histopathol 30: 193-204, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind C
    and editors: International Union Against Cancer (UICC) TNM classification of malignant tumors, 7th edition. New York, Wiley-Liss, 2010.
  17. ↵
    1. Yoshida Y,
    2. Izumi H,
    3. Torigoe T,
    4. Ishiguchi H,
    5. Itoh H,
    6. Kang D,
    7. Kohno K
    : p53 physically interacts with mitochondrial transcription factor A and differentially regulates binding to damages DNA. Cancer Res 63: 3729-3734, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Hasebe T,
    2. Sasaki S,
    3. Sugitoh M,
    4. Ono M,
    5. Saitoh N,
    6. Ochiai A
    : Proliferative activities of tumor stromal cells play important roles in tumor thicjness and progression of T3 ulcerative-type colorectal cancer. Virchows Arch 442: 569-576, 2003.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Benedix F,
    2. Kube R,
    3. Meyer F,
    4. Schmidt U,
    5. Gastinger I,
    6. Lippeert H
    : Colon/Rectum Carcinomas (Primary Tumor) Study Group. Comparison of 17,641 patients with right- and left-sided colon cancer: differences in epidermology, perioperative course, histology, and survival. Dis Colon Rectum 53: 57-64, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Meguid RA,
    2. Slidell MS,
    3. Wolfgang CL,
    4. Chang DC,
    5. Ahuja N
    : Is there a difference in survival between right- versus left-sided colon cancers? Ann Surg Oncol 15: 2388-2394, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Suttie SA,
    2. Shaikh I,
    3. Mullen R,
    4. Amin AI,
    5. Daniel T,
    6. Yalamarthi S
    : Outcome of right- and left-sided colonic and rectal cancer following surgical resection. Colorectal Dis 13: 884-889, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Derwinger K,
    2. Gustavsson B
    : Variations in demography and prognosis by colon cancer location. Anticancer Res 31: 2347-2350, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Jess P,
    2. Hansen IO,
    3. Gamborg M,
    4. Jess T,
    5. on behalf of the Danish Colorectal Cancer Group
    : A nationwide Danish cohort study challenging the categorization into right-sided and left-sided colon cancer. BMJ Open 3: e002608, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Warschkow R,
    2. Sulz MC,
    3. Tarantino I,
    4. Schmied BM,
    5. Cerny T,
    6. Güller U
    : Better survival in right-sided versus left-sided stage I-III colon cancer patients. BMC Cancer 16: 554, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Weiss JM,
    2. Pfau PR,
    3. O'Conner ES,
    4. King J,
    5. LoConte N,
    6. Kennrdy G,
    7. Smith MA
    : Mortality by stage for for right- versus left-sided colon cancer: analysis of surveillance, epidemiology, and results-medicare data. J Clin Oncol 29: 4401-4409, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Wang F,
    2. Bai L,
    3. Liu TS,
    4. Yu YY,
    5. He MM,
    6. Liu KY,
    7. Luo HY,
    8. Zhang DS,
    9. Jin Y,
    10. Wang FH,
    11. Wang ZQ,
    12. Wang DS,
    13. Qin MZ,
    14. Ren C,
    15. Li YH,
    16. Xu RH
    : Right- and left-sided colorectal cancers respond differently to cetuximab. Chinese J of Cancer 34: 24, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Dang X,
    2. Ghoshal K,
    3. Majumder S,
    4. Yadav SP,
    5. Jacob T
    : Mitochondrial transcriptional factor A and its downdtream targets are up-regulated in a rat hepatoma. J Biol Chem 277: 43309-43318, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Choi YS,
    2. Kim S,
    3. Lee HK,
    4. Lee KU,
    5. Pak K
    : On vitro methylation of nuclear respirayory factor-1 binding site suppresses the prompter activity of mitochondrial transcription factor A. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 314: 118-122, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Savagner F,
    2. Mirebeau D,
    3. Jacques C,
    4. Guyetant S,
    5. Morgan C,
    6. Franc B,
    7. Reynier P,
    8. Malithièry Y
    : PGC-1-related coactivator and targets are upregulated in thyroid oncocytoma. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 310: 779-784, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Piantadosi C,
    2. Suliman HB
    : Mitochondrial transcription factor A induction by redox activation of nuclear respiratory factor 1. J Biol Chem 281: 324-333, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Singh KP,
    2. Kumari R,
    3. Treas J,
    4. DuMond JW
    : Chronic exposure to arsenic causes increased cell survival, DNA damage, and increased expression of mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) in human prostate epithelial cells. Chem Res Toxicol 24: 340-349, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Lee CH,
    2. Wu SB,
    3. Hong CH,
    4. Liao WT,
    5. Wu CY,
    6. Chen GS,
    7. Wei YH,
    8. Yu HS
    : Aberrant cell proliferation by enhanced mitochondrial biogenesis via mtTFA in arsenical skin cancer. Am J Path 178: 2066-2076, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kurita T
    : Mitochondrial transcription factor A regulates BCL2L1 gene expression and is a prognostic faxtor in serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci 103: 239-244, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Wang J,
    2. Silva JP,
    3. Gustafsson CM,
    4. Rustin P,
    5. Larsson NG
    : Increased in vivo apoptosis in cells lacking mitochondrial DNA gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 4038-4043, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Yoshida Y,
    2. Hasegawa J,
    3. Nezu R,
    4. Kim YK,
    5. Hirota M,
    6. Kawano K,
    7. Izumi H,
    8. Kohno K
    : Clinical usefulness of mitochondrial transcription factor A expression as a predictive marker in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFOX. Cancer Sci 102: 578-582, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 38, Issue 1
January 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A Expression in Patients with Right- or Left-sided Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
13 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A Expression in Patients with Right- or Left-sided Colorectal Cancer
TAKEFUMI KATSUKI, YOSHIFUMI NAKAYAMA, MASAKI AKIYAMA, YUSUKE SAWATSUBASHI, JUN NAGATA, NORITAKA MINAGAWA, TAKAYUKI TORIGOE, HIROTO IZUMI, KIMITOSHI KOHONO, KEIJI HIRATA
Anticancer Research Jan 2018, 38 (1) 569-575;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Significance of Mitochondrial Transcription Factor A Expression in Patients with Right- or Left-sided Colorectal Cancer
TAKEFUMI KATSUKI, YOSHIFUMI NAKAYAMA, MASAKI AKIYAMA, YUSUKE SAWATSUBASHI, JUN NAGATA, NORITAKA MINAGAWA, TAKAYUKI TORIGOE, HIROTO IZUMI, KIMITOSHI KOHONO, KEIJI HIRATA
Anticancer Research Jan 2018, 38 (1) 569-575;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes, and Molecular Profiling in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
  • Post-progression Nutritional and Immune Status Determines Survival After First-line Chemotherapy in Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer
  • Factors Associated With Nonadherence to S-1 in Docetaxel+S-1(DS) Therapy, an Adjuvant Treatment for Gastric Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Mitochondrial transcription factor A
  • colorectal cancer
  • mitochondrial DNA
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire