Abstract
Background: MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MERTK) is a receptor tyrosine kinase that affects cancer cell proliferation. This study evaluated the effects of the synthetic MERTK inhibitors UNC569 and UNC1062 on in vitro growth of acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) cells. Materials and Methods: Four AML cell lines expressing MERTK were treated with UNC569 and UNC1062 and analyzed for cell proliferation, immunoblotting, and gene expression. The effects of MERTK knockdown were also evaluated. Results: Treatment with the inhibitors suppressed cell growth and induced apoptosis in all cell lines. OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells, in which MERTK was constitutively phosphorylated by autocrine mechanisms, were highly susceptible to these inhibitors. The treatment reduced the phosphorylation of MERTK and its down-stream signalling molecules, v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK). Similar effects were observed after MERTK knockdown. The inhibitors and the knockdown caused similar changes in mRNA expression. Conclusion: These MERTK inhibitors are potential molecular-targeted drugs for treating AML expressing constitutively phosphorylated MERTK.
MER proto-oncogene tyrosine kinase (MERTK) is a member of the TYRO3 protein tyrosine kinase (TYRO3)/AXL receptor tyrosine kinase (AXL)/MERTK family of receptor tyrosine kinases (collectively referred to as TAM). These kinases play important roles in cell growth in various organs and types of cancer. Binding of MERTK to its ligands, growth arrest-specific 6 (GAS6) and protein S, induces the phosphorylation of MERTK and its downstream signalling molecules, including v-akt murine thymoma viral oncogene homolog 1 (AKT) and extracellular signal–regulated kinase (ERK) (1). Overexpression of MERTK has been reported in acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) cells (2-4). However, the role of MERTK in leukaemia cell growth remains unclear.
Two small-molecule MERTK-selective inhibitors, UNC569 and UNC1062, have been developed (5-7) that inhibit the phosphorylation of MERTK by occupying its adenine pocket. The effects of UNC1062 are more specific to MERTK than those of UNC569. UNC569 was reported to suppress ALL cell growth in vitro (5). However, the effects of these inhibitors on AML cells and their molecular mechanisms have not been elucidated.
To elucidate the role of MERTK in the growth of AML cells and the molecular mechanism of action of these MERTK inhibitors, we evaluated the effects of these MERTK inhibitors on AML cell growth in vitro. To confirm the specificity of the effects, MERTK knockdown experiments using small interfering RNA (siRNA) were also performed. We aimed to determine whether MERTK inhibitors are candidates for use as novel molecularly-targeted drugs for the treatment of AML.
Materials and Methods
Cell lines and MERTK inhibitors. Four human AML cell lines were used in this study. The TMD7 cell line was established in our laboratory (8). The OCI/AML5 cell line was established at Ontario Cancer Institute (9). The THP-1 and HEL cell lines were obtained from the Health Science Research Resource Bank (Osaka, Japan). Normal lymphocytes from two healthy volunteers who provided informed consent were also used. UNC569 and UNC1062 were purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA) and Glixx Laboratories (Southborough, MA, USA), respectively. These inhibitors were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at concentrations of 20 mM and 3 mM, respectively.
Cell growth assay. Short-term cell growth was evaluated using a colorimetric WST-8 assay kit (Dojindo Laboratories, Kumamoto, Japan). Cells were cultured in 96-well plates in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum, with or without inhibitors, in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After 72 h, WST-8 and 1-methoxy-5-methylphenazinium methyl sulphate were added and the optical density (OD) was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay plate reader to determine the relative cell number. Relative cell proliferation was calculated as the percentage of the mean OD value normalized to that of the control cells cultured with DMSO. Student's t-test was used to determine statistical significance of differences in growth. To examine cell morphology, the harvested cells were stained with May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain and observed on cytospin preparations under a microscope.
Apoptosis assay. Cells treated with the inhibitors for 48 h were stained with Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) and propidium iodide (PI), then analysed using a Navios cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) to evaluate the induction of apoptosis.
MERTK knockdown by siRNA. MERTK knockdown by siRNA was performed to confirm the specificity of the effects of the inhibitors. Three different pre-designed MERTK siRNAs (Stealth siRNA™, HSS 116030, 116031, and 173654) were purchased from Life Technologies (Carlsbad, CA, USA). Stealth RNAi negative control duplex was used as a control. Cells were transfected with each siRNA using the Neon™ pipette tip chamber-based electroporation system (Life Technologies) and immediately transferred to the culture medium.
Immunoblot analysis. The lysates from the cells cultured with the inhibitors or siRNA were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and analysed by immunoblotting with antibodies against MERTK, AKT, phospho-AKT, ERK, phospho-ERK, caspase-3, cleaved caspase-3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), GAS6 (R & D systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA), phospho-MERTK, protein S, and α-tubulin (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), which was used as a loading control. Immunoreactive bands were detected using a Pierce Enhanced Chemiluminescent Western Blotting Substrate (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL, USA). Each assay was repeated more than twice to ascertain qualitative reproducibility.
Microarray analysis. Microarray analysis was performed to assess the effects of the inhibitors and siRNA on comprehensive gene expression. OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells were treated with UNC569, UNC1062, DMSO (solvent control), MERTK siRNA, or control siRNA for 24 h. Total RNA was extracted using a High Pure RNA isolation kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and used to prepare cyanine-3-labelled cRNA, which was hybridized to a SurePrint G3 Human GE microarray 8×60K v3 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The expression profile was analysed using Agilent Feature Extraction 11.5.1.1 software.
Results
Effects of MERTK inhibitors on cell growth. Treatment with UNC569 and UNC1062 suppressed growth in all AML cell lines in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1A). OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells were more susceptible to the inhibitors than THP-1 and HEL cells. The treatment did not significantly affect the viability of normal lymphocytes in the range of concentrations tested (Figure 1B).
Cytospin preparations of cells treated with UNC569 and UNC1062 indicated there were apoptotic cells with nuclear condensation and apoptotic bodies in all AML cell lines (data not shown). Consistent with these results, the flow cytometric apoptosis assay revealed that the treatment increased the annexin-V positive fraction of OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells (Figure 2). These results indicated that treatment with the inhibitors induced apoptosis.
MERTK, GAS6, and protein S expression in AML cell lines. MERTK protein was expressed in all four cell lines (Figure 3). MERTK protein was constitutively phosphorylated in OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells and weakly phosphorylated in HEL cells. GAS6 and protein S were strongly expressed in OCI/AML5, THP-1, and HEL cells, but weakly expressed in TMD7 cells. In the subsequent experiments to examine the effects of the inhibitors on signalling proteins, we used OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells, in which MERTK was constitutively activated.
Effects of MERTK inhibitors on signalling proteins. Phosphorylation of MERTK in OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells was suppressed by treatment with the inhibitors without significantly affecting the amount of MERTK protein (Figure 4). The treatment also suppressed phosphorylation of AKT and ERK, which are down-stream proteins of MERTK (1), and induced cleavage of caspase-3.
Effects of MERTK siRNA on cell growth and signalling proteins. To ascertain whether the above effects of the inhibitors were due to inhibition of MERTK function or off-target effects, we performed MERTK knockdown experiments. Because siRNA HSS 173654 (5’-GCCGCAUUGCUAAGAUGCCUGUUAA-3’) suppressed MERTK expression most potently among the three MERTK-specific siRNAs (data not shown), its effects on cell growth are shown in Figure 5. MERTK knockdown suppressed the growth of OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells. In addition, MERTK knockdown suppressed the expression of MERTK and slightly suppressed the phosphorylation of AKT and ERK, without a decrease in AKT and ERK expression (Figure 6). MERTK knockdown also induced cleavage of caspase-3.
Microarray analysis. The effects of the inhibitors and MERTK siRNA on comprehensive gene expression were examined using microarray analysis. The data from the representative genes are shown in Table I.
MERTK siRNA potently suppressed MERTK mRNA expression without affecting the expression of TYRO3 and AXL. Treatment with the inhibitors down-regulated some genes such as cyclin D1 (CCND1), but up-regulated others such as recombination activating 1 (RAG1). Adrenomedullin (ADM) was down-regulated by both inhibitors, but up-regulated by MERTK siRNA in OCI/AML5 cells. Expression of GAS6 and PROS1, which encodes protein S, was not significantly affected by the inhibitors or siRNA.
Discussion
This study indicated that the MERTK inhibitors UNC569 and UNC1062 suppressed the growth of AML cells and induced their apoptosis. The suppressive effects of the inhibitors were more potent in OCI/AML5 and TMD7 cells in which MERTK was constitutively phosphorylated. A possible mechanism for the constitutive phosphorylation of MERTK in the cells was autocrine activation by the MERTK ligands GAS6 and protein S produced by the leukaemia cells themselves. We confirmed that the use of a non-serum culture medium did not affect the intensity of their phosphorylation (data not shown). Therefore, GAS6 and protein S contained in the serum of the culture medium did not act as ligands. The reason that MERTK in THP-1 cells was not phosphorylated, even though the cells expressed GAS6 and protein S, is not clear.
As indicated above, treatment with MERTK inhibitors suppressed phosphorylation of its down-stream proteins and induced cleavage of caspase-3. MERTK knockdown resulted in the same effects. These results suggest that the effects of the inhibitors were due to on-target effects.
Conversely, the changes in the expression of some genes caused by the inhibitors and those caused by MERTK knockdown were discrepant, although the discrepancies were not necessarily due to off-target effects because gene expression was examined only 24 h after inhibitor treatment and siRNA transfection. For example, ADM expression was down-regulated by UNC569 treatment but up-regulated by siRNA transfection. ADM was previously reported to be involved in the proliferation of AML cells (10). Therefore, this effect of UNC569 may be an advantage of an anti-leukaemia drug. However, because ADM is also involved in vasodilation (11), administration of UNC569 might result in changes in blood pressure.
Recently, various novel TAM-targeting drugs have been developed and clinical trials using TAM-targeting drugs against leukaemia and various cancer types have been performed (12, 13). Considering the above effects of UNC569 and UNC1062 and the fact that they did not significantly affect the viability of normal lymphocytes, these inhibitors may be useful as novel molecularly-targeted drugs against AML cells, particularly AML cells in which MERTK is constitutively activated. Before their clinical use, further investigation for the possibility of adverse effects due to their off-target and on-target effects on normal cells and organs is required. Moreover, development of drug-sensitivity tests to predict validity and select appropriate AML cases are required.
Acknowledgements
The Authors thank Mr. Yuki Yokoi for his experimental help and discussion. This study was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (No. 26460669).
Footnotes
This article is freely accessible online.
- Received September 12, 2017.
- Revision received October 29, 2017.
- Accepted October 31, 2017.
- Copyright© 2018, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved