Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Physical Needs of Long-term Cancer Patients

PAOLO TRALONGO, MARIA GIOVANNA PESCARENICO, ANTONELLA SURBONE, SEBASTIANO BORDONARO, MASSIMILIANO BERRETTA and ANNAMARIA DI MARI
Anticancer Research September 2017, 37 (9) 4733-4746;
PAOLO TRALONGO
1UOC Medical Oncology, Umberto I hospital, Syracuse, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tralongo{at}raosr.it
MARIA GIOVANNA PESCARENICO
2Medical Oncology, Di Vaio Hospital, Fidenza USL, Parma, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANTONELLA SURBONE
3Department of Medicine, New York University Medical School, Division of Medical Oncology, New York, NY, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEBASTIANO BORDONARO
1UOC Medical Oncology, Umberto I hospital, Syracuse, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASSIMILIANO BERRETTA
4Medical Oncology Department, CRO, Aviano, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANNAMARIA DI MARI
1UOC Medical Oncology, Umberto I hospital, Syracuse, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The enormous success in the therapeutic area of oncology has allowed achieving a number of long-term survival patients unthinkable until a few decades ago. The number of cancer survivors in the world has, in fact, almost tripled in the last decade alone. Anticancer therapies, including those of the latest generation, aimed at targeting also the chronicity of the disease, are not free from side-effects, especially when used in the long term. This scenario should lead to development of follow-up programs with the purpose of assessing long-term effects related to cancer treatments, in addition to the early detection of any relapse or a second tumor. Oncologists who take care of cancer survivors cannot ignore these effects; it is, therefore, essential to start a program of prevention and treatment of these sequelae, to meet patients' health needs.

  • Survivorship
  • cancer
  • treatment
  • toxicity
  • review

As a result of improved screening programs, therapeutic advances and population aging, long-term survival is increasingly common in the path of patients with a cancer diagnosis (1). While there has been an increase in the number of cancer diagnosis, also the number of cancer survivors has also increased.

In recent decades, the number of patients with a history of cancer in Italy has increased from about 2 million in 2006 to over 3 million in 2016 (2). In 2020, 4.5 million cancer patients are expected. The Italian data of cancer survivors are in accordance with the rest of the world: the number of cancer survivor in the US, for example, has increased from 3 million in 1970 to about 15 million survivors in 2012, representing 5% of the total population.

Oncologists must face a new scenario with new drugs that convert the metastatic disease to chronic and adjuvant treatments that have increased survival with, however, different and also unusual side-effects; therefore, early detection can aid avoiding the subsequent comorbidity and allowing diagnosis of early recurrence or second cancers. There are an increasing number of people of any age, health and social status that need to return to an active life, despite cancer. The institutions and clinicians need to respond to the needs of these patients who may live a long time with a disease and claim the right to recover a satisfactory quality of life (QoL). Due to the differences in defining cancer survivors in different countries (3), or identifying long-term cancer survivors, one must find a common language and plan appropriate models of care, rehabilitation and communication (4, 5) (Table I).

A quarter of Italian long-term cancer survivors can be considered cured (6). Yet, the improved cancer survival rates reached in recent years have medical and psychosocial implications: from late side-effects of cancer treatment that may impair the QoL to major sequaele to the risk of relapse and metachronous cancer (7). Several treatments, in fact, may be associated with various complications ranging from minor to serious and, occasionally, fatal. In addition, the increasing age of survivors is accompanied by the potential development of other diseases and multi-morbidity. Any related damaging treatment effects may, finally, increase the incidence of comorbidity, frailty and premature mortality (8, 9).

The national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN) guideline of 2017 defined the standards for survivorship care (Table II) that include not only the prevention and surveillance of new and recurrent cancer but also the prevention and assessment of late effects and the intervention for the consequences of cancer and treatment (10). Regarding the latter, it is possible to identify those occurring during treatment or early after treatment and can last a long time, as well as those that occur long after the end of treatment and can also be long-lasting. Late side-effects can be classified into (a) side-effects affecting specific systems (organ alterations, endocrine abnormalities, premature aging and others), (b) functional changes (incontinence, lymphedema, ostomies, osteoporosis, arthritis and others) and, finally, (c) second malignancies (11). Early recognition of late side-effects can improve patients' QoL and even survival. The “follow-up” is the “privileged phase” to recognize and treat the needs of cancer survivorships.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Category of cancer survivors (5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Standards for survivorship care (10).

This review describes accurately selected late treatment-related medical sequelae, their pathogenesis, management, treatments and prevention.

Needs

Cardiac. Cardiac injuries can appear at the end of chemotherapy treatment and may progress or stabilize after 12 months of treatment. Literature data (12, 13) report improvements that could be transient or durable with a different duration for different time. It is also possible that injuries manifest at any time in patients' life (12). Patients with cardiac function reduced within 6 months of treatment should be considered at high risk of subsequent development of late cardiac failure as cardiac failure or lethal arrhythmia may occur even 20 years after treatment exposure (13).

Cardiomyopathy, pericarditis, as well as congestive heart failure, are the most typical clinical manifestations of cardiotoxicity.

Anthracyclines are one of the agents that are often responsible for cardiotoxicity. The total dose of anthracyclines is directly related to congestive cardiomyopathy. A cumulative dose of anthracyclines greater than 300 mg/m2 has been associated with an increase risk of heart failure (16) and shown to be present in 5% patients after 15 years from end of treatment (14, 17).

In the national surgical adjuvant breast and bowel project (NSABP) B-31 trial of breast cancer patients, the rates of symptomatic heart failure after 7 years were 4% in patients treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy and trastuzumab and 1.3% in those treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy alone (18).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Main ocular side-effects and correlation with medical therapy.

Anthracycline cardiotoxicity is higher when the treatment is associated with human epidermal growth factor receptor (16). Cardiomyocyte human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is uniquely susceptible to trastuzumab (17). Trastuzumab toxicity is reversible with cessation of treatment. Cyclophosphamide administered at standard or high doses in combination with mediastinal irradiation has been associated with frequent development of cardiomyopathy. Heart exposure to radiation treatment can determine valvular damage and ischemic heart disease, especially when the dose received is >30 Gy and when younger patients are involved (15).

Frequently, cardiac damage is clinically manifested as left ventricular dysfunction but minimally symptomatic cardiac toxicity has also been reported (16). Biologic drugs may also be responsible for cardiotoxicity. Clinically, the most frequent manifestations are represented by acute coronary syndrome, hypertension, QT prolongation, ventricular dysfunction and heart failure. Regarding the use of anti-angiogenic drugs (bevacizumab, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, vemurafenib) the damage, in terms of pathophysiology, is often caused by the alteration of the linkings of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR) with their respective ligands. The inhibition of VEGF and PDGFR can lead to a reduction in myocardial capillary density and contractile dysfunction, fibrosis and heart failure. Furthermore, cardiomyocytes can promote the release of pro-apoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) factor, triggering the intrinsic apoptotic pathway activation and subsequent cell death resulting in necrosis. (19) To date, in clinical practice, any myocardial damage is monitored through the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. Recent data indicate that troponin measurement and especially the finding of out of range values during the chemotherapy treatment could favor the identification of patients at risk for the development of ventricular dysfunction and/or additional cardiac side-effects during follow-up (20). The use of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (such as enalapril) has been shown to have a cardioprotective effect and could, therefore, represent a strategy for prophylaxis in some categories of patients at risk (21).

Ocular. The eye is an organ with a complex neurological network with blood vessels, muscles and skin. It is a target organ for many drugs used to treat cancer: tamoxifen is responsible for retinopathy, while fluoropyrimidine is responsible of obstruction of the lacrimal gland. Probably, the ocular side-effects will increase considering the, almost ubiquitous, distribution of the molecular sites that, unfortunately, are common targets in neoplastic population (Table III). Many cancer treatments (chemotherapy, endocrine and biologic therapy) may be responsible for ocular toxicity. Eye problems are often underestimated from the epidemiological point of view, with the literature on ocular toxicity in cancer patients being poor. By contrast, the early detection of a possible ocular side-effect would allow the complete functional recovery with a significant impact on patients' QoL. The most common side-effects are photophobia, conjunctivitis, blurred vision, cataract, lacrimal dysfunction, dry eye, keratitis and neuropathy.

Pathogenetically, eye damage is sustained by different mechanisms, some not yet fully identified. During treatment with 5-fluorouracil and other fluoropyrimidines, the damage is often caused by the obstruction of the lacrimal gland; cisplatin (CDDP) results in injury to the eye through optic neuritis or retinal ischemia (23); pemetrexed is often associated with conjunctivitis through a mechanism not identified yet; tamoxifen promotes the production of retinal crystals and posterior sub-capsular opacity, mainly responsible for retinopathy. With regard to treatment with targeted therapies, there are various ocular side-effects reported with, however, not fully known yet mechanisms. In preclinical toxicity studies, a dose of 40 mg/kg/day of gefinitib determines a corneal epithelium reversible thinning in rats and dogs after an one- to six-month treatment. In dogs treated with the higher dose of gefitinib for six months, the corneal opacification became irreversible after stopping the drug. Preclinical data are consistent with the pharmacological mechanism of action of gefitinib because epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is highly expressed in the basal epithelial cells, conjunctival and corneal epithelium. Imatinib, used for the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), can be responsible for periorbital edema, optic neuritis and macular edema (24). Pathogenetically, the damage could be determined by inhibition of c-kit expressed on dendrocytes with a consequent increase in capillary permeability and fluid formation (25).

Neurocognitive. Even if comparisons across studies are difficult, concentration difficulties, short-term memory, difficulties in problem solving, visual memory and verbal information processing are reported in long-term survivors (26). In many cases, they are durable and disabling (27).

Brain irradiation or intrathecal methotrexate or cytarabine can be responsible of neurocognitive sequaele (28) with radionecrosis, dystrophic calcification necrotizing leukoencephalopathy and cerebellar sclerosis.

The intellectual and academic achievement deficits reported in long-term survivors of childhood cancers could be due to chemotherapy or radiotherapy damage to normal white matter, intracranial endothelial cells, as well as immunological mechanisms.

The role of systemic treatment in affecting the white matter was documented in a 2012 study of 196 women with breast cancer who had been treated with adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate and fluorouracil (CMF), a regimen commonly used in those years. The patient group was compared with a control group consisting of 1,509 women. The study showed that at 21 years of median distance from treatment completion, breast cancer survivors had frequent problems concerning learning and recent memory, while their past memory had not been affected; also, in this category of patients, increased processing difficulties, problems of inhibition and motor problems were reported (29). According to the authors, the type of side-effects was similar to that recorded in the same patients at the end of treatment, being particularly relevant in patients of more advanced age.

Metabolic syndrome. The metabolic syndrome is characterized by a reduced insulin sensitivity, obesity, dyslipidemia and hypertension. The diagnosis of metabolic syndrome represents a risk factor for cardiovascular events. Endocrine treatment of different diseases can cause weight gain and reduced insulin sensitivity. Patients with prostate cancer, who have undergone chemical or surgical orchiectomy, may develop hyperglycemia and cardiovascular events (30-32), especially patients older than 65 years, as shown in a study of 41,362 older patients recruited between 1996 and 1999 and followed until 2012, where the incidence of these events was statistically higher than in the normal population (30). In the cardiovascular events, there is a discrepancy between the results of observational studies and those of clinical trials. Some recent studies do not show a risk of cardiovascular events in patients with prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation. This is probably due to methodological bias, such as limited information on the type of tumor, duration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), comparison of patients with prostate cancer not treated with androgen deprivation, lack of information on the medical history (31-33). The study by O'Farrell et al., however, suggested that patients with prostate cancer, who have at least two cardiac events within the first year of starting endocrine treatment, develop a significantly higher risk of cardiac events than those who did not have cardiac disease (30). Different hormone levels may play a role in metabolic syndrome. Low levels of serum testosterone and sex hormone binding globulin have been associated with obesity, dyslipidemia and insulin resistance and other markers of vascular damage in cross-sectional studies (32, 34). Patients with metabolic syndrome who receive chemotherapy, when having a high body mass index (BMI) before treatment, tend to increase their BMI during follow-up and have lower levels of total testosterone and increased urinary excretion of cortisol metabolites compared with patients without metabolic syndrome. BMI and insulin are associated with metabolic syndrome, while testosterone and urinary metabolite of cortisol are associated with BMI. Testosterone-related increased BMI plays a role in the development of metabolic syndrome. Estrogen has, in turn, a positive effect on the lipid profile. Several studies have documented that the use of tamoxifen (selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs)) in postmenopausal women seems to improve the lipid profile resulting in a protective effect on obesity and reduced risk of cardiovascular events (35).

It is likely that treatment with aromatase inhibitors (AI) leads to an increase in patients' cardiovascular risk by 3-4 degrees compared to those treated with tamoxifen (36). Suppressing estrogen does not probably cause a change in blood glucose or risk of diabetes but is associated with liver function abnormalities (37). In overweight and/or obese women taking tamoxifen for chemoprevention, there is an increased presence of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Finally, women who have undergone bilateral oophorectomy are at risk of developing metabolic syndrome, regardless of their overall health and lifestyle habits (38).

By contrast, studies show that many women being treated for breast cancer tend to prefer a high-calorie diet reducing physical activity at the same time: especially those who are overweight at diagnosis. In breast cancer patients, however, exercise can help to change the levels of insulinemia and reduce abdominal obesity; both elements observed in the metabolic syndrome.

A healthy lifestyle for these patients should include close monitoring of lipids, liver enzymes and glicemic levels to ensure early intervention. Emerging data also suggest that metformin may have beneficial effects in the prevention of metabolic consequences of androgen deprivation in patients not yet diabetic (39).

Thyroid. Radiation treatment to the neck is responsible for thyroid impairment (40). Iodine contrast agents may be associated with acute thyroid side-effects, including hyperthyroidism in the presence of nodules or mild Graves' disease or transient hypothyroidism in Hashimoto's thyroiditis patients. Cytotoxic agents are rarely associated with abnormalities of the thyroid gland in the absence of irradiation. However, they can sensitize the thyroid effects of concomitant radiotherapy, increasing the risk of hypothyroidism. Even immunotherapies and targeted therapies can lead to side-effects as the thyroid is a biomolecular target of various drugs. Considering the genetics of thyroid cancer, it is clear how many specific biological drugs are paradoxically responsible for thyroid toxicity. The mechanism of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)-induced hypothyroidism is unclear. Thyroid dysfunction is likely related to effects of TKIs on vascular activity. TKIs may reduce thyroid blood flow, determine transient ischemic damage and, consequently, thyrotoxicosis. When the decrease in blood flow occurs more slowly, thyroid dysfunction is more gradual and can result in hypothyroidism. Thyroid cells express VEGF mRNA and VEGFR, while studies on mice have shown glandular capillary regression exposure with TKIs (41). It is possible that thalidomide and lenalidomide compromise the flow of blood to the thyroid similarly to that suggested for TKIs. In a 2002 study, 20% of participants who received thalidomide for multiple myeloma has developed an increase of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) to 5 mUI/l, while 7% had a TSH greater than 10 mUI/l (42). Hypothyroidism occurs mostly 1-6 months after initiation of treatment. In humans, two recent cases have shown a reduction in thyroid volume and vascularization with rapid recovery after discontinuation of sunitinib. (43). Hypothyroidism is the most common (90-95%) non-malignant late effect involving the thyroid gland, although hyperthyroidism and thyroid cancer have also been reported (44). Many symptoms of hypothyroidism, such as fatigue and constipation, are common in cancer patients and it may be difficult to attribute them to the tumor or antineoplastic treatments received or to drugs used to control symptoms. Unrecognized hypothyroidism or thyrotoxicosis can affect the metabolism of other drugs. Finally, although rare, thyroid dysfunction can cause complications, such as myxedema, coma and heart failure. In case of thyrotoxicosis, symptoms include palpitations, weight loss, heat intolerance, frequent bowel movements, tremors, proximal muscle weakness, tachycardia, insomnia, irritability, and fever. In the case of hypothyroidism, the symptoms include increased fatigue, weight gain, dry skin or hair, brittle nails, constipation, bradycardia and hypothermia.

Peripheral neuropathy. Several drugs can cause peripheral neuropathy (45) either as an acute side-effect, for example with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy (LHOP), or dose-dependent. This functional alteration is very important and includes dysesthesia and reduced sensitivity of the extremities leading, in some cases, to considerably reduced functional activity; this consequence affects particularly older patients who may experience loss of autonomy (46). Patients report various sensory abnormalities, including paresthesia, dysesthesia, tingling, itch, pain (constrictive, throbbing, sharp, button). Sensory deficits can lead to ataxia and gait disturbance. More rarely, patients report Lhermitte's phenomenon, which is characterized by itching, Raynaud's phenomenon and muscle aches. Myalgias have been reported in the course of treatment with gemcitabine and taxanes. Common symptoms are various types of peripheral neuropathy, twitching, disturbances of smell and taste, vestibular and sensory disturbances and Raynaud's syndrome. There are predisposing factors that must be taken into account when considering a treatment with these drugs and proposing it to cancer patients (elderly age, diabetes, alcohol abuse, prior history of neuropathies or use of other neurotoxic treatments for cancer or other diseases).

The mechanisms involved in peripheral neuropathy result from the inflammatory response with production of cytokines that can sensitize peripheral nociceptive afferents. In particular, antineoplastic agents act on ion channels (sodium, potassium, calcium) and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors of ganglion roots membrane and/or spinal cord's dorsal horn neurons, altering the intracellular calcium levels and promoting pathways that trigger neuropathic pain (47) (Table IV).

Osteoporosis. Bone remodeling is a dynamic process that refers to the balance between the formation of skeletal matrix supported by osteoblasts and resorption by osteoclasts. The latter have hematopoietic origin and differentiate into multinucleated giant cells through signaling pathways that include cytokines, growth factors and hormones (48).

Osteoprotegerin (OPG) plays a key role: secreted by osteoblasts, osteoprotegerin acts as a receptor for receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand (RANKL), inhibiting the activation of osteoclasts. Estrogens (and androgens) increase the secretion of OPG by osteoblasts, decrease RANK affinity for OPG, cause down-regulation of the expression of RANKL on osteoclasts and bone resorption. When estrogen or androgen levels decrease physiologically during menopause or for the iatrogenic effect of hormonal therapy or chemotherapy, the affinity of RANKL for OPG decreases, causing increased bone resorption. Other factors that influence the affinity of RANKL for OPG are parathyroid hormone (PTH), insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and inflammatory cytokines.

Osteoporosis not only correlates to an endocrine abnormality but also to lifestyle, including alcohol consumption, smoke, corticosteroid therapy and eating habits, such as a diet low in calcium (at times consequent to treatment of gastric or other cancers). For example, the overall prevalence of osteoporosis in Korean patients suffering from gastric cancer over the age of 50 years is 39.6%; 29.8% for men and 54.5% for women (49).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Possible mechanisms involved in the development of neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapeutic agents (48).

Skin toxicity. Skin toxicity is also a frequent side-effect. It is determined and related mainly with the activity of several drugs in bio-molecular target (anti-EGFR, anti-HER2, anti-VEGFR). The skin effects, although not a risk to life for the patients, can be huge to the point of compromising their QoL. This may lead to reducing the dosage of the drug or even discontinuing the treatment, thus putting at risk the effectiveness and outcome of cancer therapy. The pathophysiological mechanism underlying these effects on the skin is correlated with the direct action of these drugs in the skin cells and, mainly, at the level of the hair follicle where keratinocytes are present in high concentration; EGFR inhibition in proliferation of undifferentiated keratinocytes in the basal layer indeed induces growth arrest and their premature differentiation. The release of chemo-tactical factors (CXCLs, CCLS) and the recruitment of leukocytes determine apoptosis, tissue damage and vasodilation (50). It, consequently, determines folliculitis, skin rash of various degrees, photosensitivity and structural changes at the level of the hair (51).

Rash is dose-dependent and occurs in 45-100% of patients. In most cases, rash is mild (grade 1-2); in only 5-18% of treated subjects, rash reaches grade three severity. This reaction consists of pruritic erythema, folliculitis and papules/pustules, mainly confined to the seborrheic areas (face, neck, shoulders, trunk) from which pus may leak, leading to crusting. Palms of the hand and soles of the feet are always spared from this type of toxicity. Rash is an early toxic event that usually appears after no more than two or three days of drug administration with a peak after two or three weeks (52). A significant decrease in the “barrier function” of the skin that is expressed also with the phenomenon of dryness (xerosis) until the skin fissures has also been reported. Finally, even nail growth can undergo changes that occur with phenomena of onychocryptosis, as a result of the reactive pyogenic granuloma.

Other common needs. Pulmonary fibrosis is a complication correlated to radiation treatments but also to chemotherapeutic agents, such as anthracycline and bleomycin (53). The clinical presentation may vary in degrees from mild to severe and symptoms may occur only during physical activity. Genitourinary alterations can occur after the use of chemotherapeutic agents causing glomerular and tubular damage, such as cisplatin, methotrexate and nitrosoureas (54). Genitourinary abnormalities in patients with prostate cancer may be clinically characterized by urinary obstruction (more frequent on the right) (55). Frequently, with the use of fluoropyrimidines, including oral ones, or radiation therapy to the abdomen and pelvis diarrhea may occur, as well as alterations in liver function indexes, which can lead to forms of toxic hepatitis and liver failure (56) (Table V).

How to Identify and Treat Needs

The main goal of cancer specialists is to optimize the quality of life of their patients by monitoring and controlling potential treatment side-effects and comorbidity. Preventing interventions must be promoted by removing, whenever possible, the causes by identifying the specific individual risk(s) of each patient with reference to each proper therapy for the type of cancer concerned. Though it is not always possible to modify a regimen according to individual patients' characteristics, it is always helpful to know these characteristics before initiating any cancer therapy. In the following section, simple measures to implement an effective management of side-effects will be analyzed (Table VI).

  • Cardiac toxicity in clinical practice should be monitored through cardiologic examination, including echocardiography, which can provide descriptive data on the heart's contractile function and left ventricular ejection fraction, and electrocardiographic examination to highlight alterations of electrical conduction (hypertension, congestive heart failure, QT prolongation). The management of ventricular dysfunction and heart failure in patients treated with anti-angiogenic drugs includes echocardiographic monitoring, evaluation of New York heart association (NYHA) class and hypertension. In some patients, for example those treated with trastuzumab, it is possible to resume treatment if there is a sufficient functional recovery of the contractile activity (Figure 1) (57). In patients at risk for advanced age, heart disease, kidney disease, diabetes or obesity, certain studies have shown that elevated values of serum troponin during chemotherapy may identify myocardial damage in a subclinical stage and cardio-protective drug ACE inhibitors (such as enalapril) may represent a prophylactic strategy (58). Some relatively simple interventions are crucial to prevent cardiac damage from modifying patients' lifestyle through a healthy diet and elimination of alcohol and smoking, thus encouraging moderate physical activity and periodic clinical evaluation, including blood tests with coagulation and lipid profile, as part of regular follow-up. Aerobic exercise is an effective non-pharmacological therapy in attenuating doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiotoxicity. Aerobic exercise is well-documented to improve systolic and diastolic function and attenuate pathological cardiac remodeling in patients with heart failure. Preclinical data suggest several pathways to mediate the protective properties of the exercise: enhancing endogenous antioxidant protective machinery, regulating pro-apoptotic signaling, limiting myocyte turn-over following DOX, preventing calcium overload in the myocyte (59). Furthermore, emerging evidence indicates that aerobic exercise is a non-toxic, pleiotropic therapy that affects diverse cardiac signaling pathways implicated in the cardiotoxicity induced by anti-HER2 and anti-angiogenic therapy (60).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table V.

    Common side-effects and etiopathogenesis.

  • Ocular toxicity should be monitored clinically. A preliminary evaluation (before any cancer treatment) helps identify categories at risk with subclinical alterations requiring close monitoring. An initial screening program, therefore, is essential for a better assessment of the effects of treatments. To date, there are only few studies available aiming at orientation of prophylactic interventions. Several studies have evaluated different approaches for the prevention of conjunctivitis induced by anti-metabolites. A randomized study by Matteucci et al. evaluated the effectiveness of steroids in combination with topical anti-inflammatory drugs (dexamethasone + diclofenac) for prophylaxis of conjunctivitis induced by high-dose cytosine arabinoside. The results show that the combination of diclofenac and dexamethasone compared to dexamethasone alone reduces significantly conjunctivitis induced by these drugs (13% vs. 45% incidence, respectively; p<0.09) (61). It is, therefore, mandatory to refer patients to an eye specialist as soon as symptoms of conjunctivitis related to treatment appear.

  • The management of cognitive impairment involves cognitive rehabilitation, adequate sleep hygiene, physical and mental activity, drug therapy (erythropoietin (EPO), antioxidants, methylphenidate, donepezil).

  • Metabolic syndrome should be monitored through regular follow-up, including clinical examination and blood tests. Clinical examination should include evaluation of BMI, waist circumference measurement, detection of pressure parameters, glucose dosage, insulin and cholesterol. Patients should be encouraged to perform physical activity, even moderate, and follow a healthy diet. Finally, groups at risk for the use of therapies that interfere with insulin and BMI (AIs, androgen deprivation) should be identified. A wealth of evidence has demonstrated that regular physical activity is associated with lower risk of death, all-cause mortality, cancer recurrence and several chronic diseases, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease, common comorbid conditions in people who have survived cancer. In addition, several reviews and meta-analyses have demonstrated that physical activity is associated with a lower risk of death, all-cause mortality and cancer recurrence, particularly among breast and colorectal cancer survivors (62). Although cancer survivors may have high levels of interest in lifestyle interventions, they may have special needs (e.g., fatigue, incontinence, lymphedema, food intolerances or digestive disorders, long-term addiction to tobacco products) that must be taken into account if attempts to promote exercise, healthful dietary change and smoking cessation are to be successful (63). Moreover, there is evidence that cancer survivors tend to reduce physical activity (64): sedentary behavior is independently associated with chronic disease-related risk factors, such as central adiposity, elevated blood glucose and insulin, and other markers of cardiovascular disease risk in healthy adults (65) (Table VII).

    View this table:
    • View inline
    • View popup
    • Download powerpoint
    Table VI.

    Specific measures to evaluate late effects and ancillary interventions.

  • Thyroid toxicity can manifest through a variety of symptoms that may be initially subtle. At the first signs of thyroid dysfunction, or when expected as potential consequence of cancer treatment, blood tests should be obtained and the patient referred to a specialist who will assess the function and structure of the gland through further laboratory tests and instrumental measurements (ultrasound, scintigraphy). Identifying patients for potential thyroid toxicity with these tests is of fundamental importance.

  • Neurotoxicity can present with different clinical features, including reversible encephalopathy, aphasia, confusion, blindness, coma, parkinsonism and peripheral neurotoxicity. Basic neurological examination of every patient is needed and numerous tests are available to evaluate and quantify the damage responsible for each clinical manifestation. Symptoms often result in functional impairment. As not to impact on the QoL and also compromise the simplest daily activities, it is, therefore, necessary to identify patients with higher risk of neurotoxicity, such as those of more advanced age or suffering from diabetes or pre-existing neuropathies or previously treated with neurotoxic drugs or those with history of alcohol or substance abuse. Regarding the management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, it is possible to use duloxetine, although with moderate strength of recommendation and intermediate level of evidence (66).

  • Osteoporosis is the most common pathology of the skeletal system characterized by progressive decrease in bone mass and deterioration of bone structure. As well as for hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, osteoporosis is a silent disease that may progress for several years before being diagnosed when a fracture occurs. Therefore, in the evaluation of patients it is essential to identify different risk groups: elderly patients who physiologically undergo a progressive decrease in bone mineralization, women undergoing endocrine treatment for breast cancer, men receiving hormonal therapy for prostate cancer or patients on chronic treatment with glucocorticoids. The most sensitive test to quantify bone density is bone densitometry. Among other tests measuring accurately bone density there are ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), single or dual photon absorptiometry (DPA) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using an X-ray source instead of a radioactive isotope. Blood tests allow a differential diagnosis between primary and secondary forms. Interventions, in case of osteopenia or frank osteoporosis, should include adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D, implementation of physical activity, limiting alcohol consumption, healthy diet, limited use of tobacco and the use of bisphosphonates, either intravenously or in oral form. A recent study showed that treatment with oral clodronate, as a preventive measure for three years, significantly reduced the incidence of osteoporosis in patients who received chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting or anti-estrogens for breast cancer. The reduction of osteoporosis was still evident seven years after cessation of treatment with clodronate. Finally, it is important to evaluate additional risk factors, such as chronic intake of corticosteroids, AIs, antidepressants, selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRIs), certain anticonvulsants, antacids, proton pump inhibitors and aluminum antacids.

    Figure 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    Figure 1.

    Management of cardiac dysfunction induced by anti-angiogenic therapies (22). NYHA, New York heart association; LV, left ventricular; EF, ejection fraction.

  • The management of cutaneous side-effects induced by EGFR inhibitors has already been investigated in several clinical studies (67, 68). All authors agreed on the role of prevention and treatment of rash without necessarily resorting to dose reduction that could compromise the antitumor effect. On the basis of the published literature on the subject and on the experience of clinical oncologists and dermatologists, this study suggests the following guidelines for rash management:

    1. Mild skin lesions (G1). Maintaining therapy with EGFR inhibitors to standard dosing and treating injuries using topical medications. Since this type of dermatitis is of inflammatory origin, anti-inflammatory drugs are to be preferred.

      Topical corticosteroids: They act in the short-term (7-10 days). It is recommended not to prepare with fatty vehicles to avoid occlusion.

      Topical erythromycin and clindamycin: Antibiotics having high anti-inflammatory activity in acne. The pharmacological effect is observed, in general, in 4-6 weeks.

      Azelaic acid: The pharmacological effect is observed, in general, in 4-6 weeks.

      View this table:
      • View inline
      • View popup
      • Download powerpoint
      Table VII.

      Interventions to promote health and lifestyles.

      Metronidazole: The pharmacological effect is observed, in general, in 4-6 weeks.

    2. Moderate lesions (G2). It is appropriate to discontinue therapy for a week and then resume a full dose. If the injury improves or reduces in degree spontaneously or with treatment, it is useful to continue treatment without dose reduction; if the injury does not improve despite topical and/or systemic therapy, reduce EGFR inhibitor dose by 30%; if the injury worsens, consider discontinuation of treatment and adopt grade 3 and 4 lesion regimen.

    3. Severe lesions (G3-4). Depending on the severity of the skin rash, it is appropriate to consider the possibility of reducing the dose or, in severe cases, to suspend treatment. For the treatment of skin rash we used in clinical practice the following medications:

      Systemic corticosteroids: Rapid anti-inflammatory effect. In case of long-term therapy (over 3-4 weeks), the use of corticosteroids may cause rosacea-forming eruptions with characteristics similar to skin rash. According to experts, should be taken caution in using these drugs, especially for the rebound effects that might occur after their suspension.

      Tetracyclines (minocycline, doxycycline, tetracycline base): With an amply demonstrated anti-inflammatory effect (69). They have been long and successfully used in the treatment of acne, although they have a slower action. As for their antibiotic activity, it should be noted that due to the extensive use of these drugs, both humans and animals have developed a widespread resistance to S. aureus and another pathogenic Gram-positive strain (Streptococcus).

      Targeted antibiotics: A systemic antibiotic therapy can be administered on material taken from pustules on infected secondary injuries.

In clinical practice, other drugs are sometimes used for which there is not, to date, definitive evidence. These drugs include sulfur salicylic creams, gentamicin with or without cortisone, topical in particularly serious cases, oily emulsions, neutral soaps. In case of paronychia, also aluminum salts or chlorhexidine are used. Topical retinoids should be avoided since they can be locally irritating and do not show any advantage over the other aforementioned products.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table VIII.

Follow-up goals.

Follow-up and Prevention Intervention

Due to the complexity of different clinical cases, we need to monitor patients through specific surveillance programs for timely monitoring potential late side-effects of cancer treatments and early detection of any disease recurrence or synchronous or metachronous cancer. In addition, surveillance programs should include counseling and encouraging patients in adopting changes in their lifestyle. The choice and implementation of such measures may vary according to the characteristics of each patient, still taking into account already available guidelines for the follow-up of patients with different types and stages of cancer (Table VIII).

The aims of the follow-up are not only those to intercept a relapse but also to identify, monitor and treat any complications of previous treatments and long-term effects of care, thus promoting physical, psychological and social rehabilitation.

In addition, follow-up should also include planning of interventions for health promotion and changing incorrect lifestyles, suggesting the adoption of a healthy diet, adequate physical activity and the removal of risk factors, such as smoking or alcohol (Table IX).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IX.

Treatment and prophylaxis.

Conclusion

In the past, diagnosis of cancer was almost always associated with poor life expectancy. Due to the lack of adequate screening programs for monitoring late side-effects and promote early diagnosis of relapses or new cancers, as well as to limited therapeutic approaches, both survival and QoL of patients were poor. Today, cancer is curable and many patients may expect to become long-term or chronic cancer patients. This phenomenon is characterized by a complex spectrum of medical and psychosocial problems that need to be monitored, detected and often treated.

As a result, every cancer patient, irrespective of stage, should be tracked and monitored over time. Similarly to what happens in other chronic diseases, such as diabetes, hypertensive heart disease or chronic renal failure, each patient should be monitored for potential side-effects and late sequaele of the treatment received. All side-effects should be carefully evaluated, even those apparently not relevant; some late side-effects, in fact, may not be considered particularly serious form a medical viewpoint, yet they could result to be quite debilitating and negatively impact on patients QoL, especially when the effects are persisting for long periods. For example, a modest diarrhea (3-4 discharges per day) does not require hospitalization or specific medical treatment except symptomatic treatment; it may, however, consistently affect patients' life in their relations and daily routine.

Tools for patients' categorization and classification of late side-effects are available. It is, thus, crucial for oncologists and general practitioners to acquire specific knowledge of these instruments, to ensure the best QoL for their patients.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received April 16, 2017.
  • Revision received July 4, 2017.
  • Accepted July 21, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Grant M,
    2. Economou D,
    3. Ferrell B,
    4. Uman G
    : From cancer patient to cancer survivor: Lost in transition. Washington, DC, USA.The National Academies Press, 2006.
  2. ↵
    1. AIRTUM
    2015. I numeri del cancro in Italia: http://www.registri-tumori.it/PDF/AIOM2015/I_numeri_del_cancro_2015.pdf.
  3. ↵
    1. Surbone A,
    2. Annunziata MA,
    3. Santoro A,
    4. Tirelli U,
    5. Tralongo P
    : Cancer patients and survivors: Changing words or changing culture? Ann Oncol 24(10): 2468-2471, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program
    . SEERStat Database: Incidence-SEER-9 regulations. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, 2003.
  5. ↵
    1. Surbone A,
    2. Tralongo P
    : Categorization of cancer survivors: Why we need it. J Clin Oncol 34(28): 3372-3374, 2016.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Hewitt M,
    2. Rowland JH,
    3. Yancik R
    : Cancer survivors in the United States: Age, health, and disability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 58: 82-91, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Dal Maso L,
    2. Guzzinati S,
    3. Buzzoni C,
    4. Capocaccia R,
    5. Serraino D,
    6. Caldarella A,
    7. Dei Tos AP,
    8. Falcini F,
    9. Autelitano M,
    10. Masanotti G,
    11. Ferretti S,
    12. Tisano F,
    13. Tirelli U,
    14. Crocetti E,
    15. De Angelis R,
    16. AIRTUM Working group
    : Long-term survival, prevalence, and cure of cancer: A population-based estimation for 818 902 Italian patients and 26 cancer types. Ann Oncol 25: 2251-2260, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. McCabe MS,
    2. Bhatia S,
    3. Oeffinger KC,
    4. Reaman GH,
    5. Tyne C,
    6. Wollins DSn,
    7. Hudson MM
    : American Society of Clinical Oncology Statement: Achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol 31(5): 631-640, 2013.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Valdivieso M1,
    2. Kujawa AM,
    3. Jones T,
    4. Baker LH
    : Cancer survivors in the United States: A review of the literature and a call action. Int J Med Sci 9(2): 163-173, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    NCCN Guideline Version 1 2017. Survivorship.
  11. ↵
    1. Ganz P.A
    1. Aziz NM
    : Late effects of cancer treatments. Cancer survivorship today and tomorrow, Ganz P.A Editor, pp. 54-76, 2007, Springer.
  12. ↵
    1. Cardinale D,
    2. Colombo A,
    3. Bacchiani G,
    4. Tedeschi I,
    5. Meroni CA,
    6. Veglia F,
    7. Civelli M,
    8. Lamantia G,
    9. Colombo N,
    10. Curigliano G,
    11. Fiorentini C,
    12. Cipolla CM
    : Early detection of anthracycline cardiotoxicity and improvement with heart failure therapy. Circulation 131(22): 1981-1988, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Steinherz LJ,
    2. Steinherz PG,
    3. Tan CT,
    4. Heller G,
    5. Murphy ML
    : Cardiac toxicity 4 to 20 years after completing anthracyline therapy. JAMA 266: 1672-1677, 1991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Curigliano G,
    2. Cardinale D,
    3. Suter T,
    4. Plataniotis G,
    5. de Azambuja E,
    6. Sandri MT,
    7. Criscitiello C,
    8. Goldhirsch A,
    9. Cipolla C,
    10. Roila F,
    11. ESMO Guidelines Working Group
    : Cardiovascular toxicity induced by chemotherapy, targeted agents and radiotherapy: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol 23(Suppl 7): vii155-166, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Cardinale D,
    2. Colombo A,
    3. Lamantia G,
    4. Colombo N,
    5. Civelli M,
    6. De Giacomi G,
    7. Rubino M,
    8. Veglia F,
    9. Fiorentini C,
    10. Cipolla CM
    : Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Clinical relevance and response to pharmacologic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 55: 213-220, 2010.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Cardinale D,
    2. Colombo A,
    3. Torrisi R,
    4. Sandri MT,
    5. Civelli M,
    6. Salvatici M,
    7. Lamantia G,
    8. Colombo N,
    9. Cortinovis S,
    10. Dessanai MA,
    11. Nolè F,
    12. Veglia F,
    13. Cipolla CM
    : Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity: Clinical and prognostic implications of troponin I evaluation. J Clin Oncol 28: 3910-3916, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Suter TM,
    2. Ewer MS
    : Cancer drugs and the heart: Importance and management. Eur Heart J 34: 1102-1111, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Romond EH,
    2. Jeong JH,
    3. Rastogi P,
    4. Swain SM,
    5. Geyer CE Jr..,
    6. Ewer MS,
    7. Rathi V,
    8. Fehrenbacher L,
    9. Brufsky A,
    10. Azar CA,
    11. Flynn PJ,
    12. Zapas JL,
    13. Polikoff J,
    14. Gross HM,
    15. Biggs DD,
    16. Atkins JN,
    17. Tan-Chiu E,
    18. Zheng P,
    19. Yothers G,
    20. Mamounas EP,
    21. Wolmark N
    : Seven-year follow-up assessment of cardiac function in NSABP B-31, a randomized trial comparing doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ACP) with ACP plus trastuzumab as adjuvant therapy for patients with node-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 30(31): 3792-3799, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Kido M,
    2. Du L,
    3. Sullivan CC,
    4. Li X,
    5. Deutsch R,
    6. Jamieson SW,
    7. Thistlethwaite PA
    : Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha reduces infarction and attenuates progression of cardiac dysfunction after myocardial infarction in the mouse. J Am Coll Cardiol 46(11): 2116-2124, 2005.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Cardinale D,
    2. Sandri MT,
    3. Colombo A,
    4. Colombo N,
    5. Boeri M,
    6. Lamantia G,
    7. Civelli M,
    8. Peccatori F,
    9. Martinelli G,
    10. Fiorentini C,
    11. Cipolla CM
    : Prognostic value of troponin I in cardiac risk stratification of cancer patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy. Circulation 109: 2749-2754, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Colombo A,
    2. Sandri MT,
    3. Salvatici M,
    4. Cipolla CM,
    5. Cardinale D
    : Cardiac complications of chemotherapy: Role of biomarkers. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 16(6): 313, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Tocchetti CG,
    2. Gallucci G,
    3. Coppola C,
    4. Piscopo G,
    5. Cipresso C,
    6. Maurea C,
    7. Giudice A,
    8. Iaffaioli RV,
    9. Arra C,
    10. Maurea N
    : The emerging issue of cardiac dysfunction induced by antineoplastic angiogenesis inhibitors. Eur J Heart Fail 15(5): 482-489, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kwan AS,
    2. Sahu A,
    3. Palexes G
    : Retinal ischemia with neovascularization in cisplatin related retinal toxicity. Am J Ophthalmol 141(1): 196-197, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Agustoni F,
    2. Platania M,
    3. Vitali M,
    4. Zilembo N,
    5. Haspinger E,
    6. Sinno V,
    7. Gallucci R,
    8. de Braud F,
    9. Garassino MC
    : Emerging toxicities in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: ocular disorders. Cancer Treat Rev 40(1): 197-203, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Renouf DJ,
    2. Velazquez-Martin JP,
    3. Simpson R,
    4. Siu LL,
    5. Bedard PL
    : Ocular toxicity of targeted therapies. J Clin Oncol 30: 3277-3286, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Foster C,
    2. Wright D,
    3. Hill H,
    4. Hopkinson J,
    5. Roffe L
    : Psychosocial implications of living 5 years or more following a cancer diagnosis: A systematic review of the research evidence. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 18: 223-247, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hutchinson AD,
    2. Hosking JR,
    3. Kichenadasse G,
    4. Mattiske JK,
    5. Wilson C
    : Objective and subjective cognitive impairment following chemotherapy for cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev 38(7): 926-934, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Tallet AV,
    2. Azria D,
    3. Barlesi F,
    4. Spano JP,
    5. Carpentier AF,
    6. Gonçalves A,
    7. Metellus P
    : Neurocognitive function impairment after whole brain radiotherapy for brain metastases: Actual assessment. Radiat Oncolol 7: 77, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Koppelmans V,
    2. Breteler MM,
    3. Boogerd W,
    4. Seynaeve C,
    5. Gundy C,
    6. Schagen SB
    : Neuropsychological performance in survivors of breast cancer more than 20 years after adjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 30: 1080-1086, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. O'Farrell S,
    2. Garmo H,
    3. Holmberg L,
    4. Adolfsson J,
    5. Stattin P,
    6. Van Hemelrijck M
    : Risk and timing of cardiovascular disease after androgen-deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 33(11): 1243-1251, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Morote J,
    2. Orsola A,
    3. Planas J,
    4. Trilla E,
    5. Raventós CX,
    6. Cecchini L,
    7. Catalán R
    : Redefining clinically significant castration levels in patients with prostate cancer receiving continuous androgen deprivation therapy. J Urol 178: 1290-1295, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Braga-Basaria M,
    2. Dobs AS,
    3. Muller DC,
    4. Carducci MA,
    5. John M,
    6. Egan J,
    7. Basaria S
    : Metabolic syndrome in men with prostate cancer undergoing long-term androgen-deprivation therapy. J Clin Oncol 24: 3979-3983, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Tsai HK,
    2. D'Amico AV,
    3. Sadetsky N,
    4. Chen MH,
    5. Carroll PR
    : Androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer and the risk of cardiovascular mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 99: 1516-1524, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Smith MR,
    2. Goode M,
    3. Zietman AL,
    4. McGovern FJ,
    5. Lee H,
    6. Finkelstein JS
    : Bicalutamide monotherapy versus leuprolide monotherapy for prostate cancer: Effects on bone mineral density and body composition. J Clin Oncol 22: 2546-2553, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Chan DS,
    2. Vieira AR,
    3. Aune D,
    4. Bandera EV,
    5. Greenwood DC,
    6. McTiernan A,
    7. Navarro Rosenblatt D,
    8. Thune I,
    9. Vieira R,
    10. Norat T
    : Body mass index and survival in women with breast cancer-systematic literature review and meta-analysis of 82 follow-up studies. Ann Oncol 25: 1901-1914, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Sestak I,
    2. Distler W,
    3. Forbes JF,
    4. Dowsett M,
    5. Howell A,
    6. Cuzick J
    : Effect of body mass index on recurrences in tamoxifen and anastrozole treated women: An exploratory analysis from the ATAC trial. J Clin Oncol 28: 3411-3415, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Reding KW,
    2. Daling JR,
    3. Doody DR,
    4. O'Brien CA,
    5. Porter PL,
    6. Malone KE
    : Effect of prediagnostic alcohol consumption on survival after breast cancer in young women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 17: 1988-1996, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Chen X,
    2. Lu W,
    3. Zheng W,
    4. Gu K,
    5. Chen Z,
    6. Zheng Y,
    7. Shu XO
    : Obesity and weight change in relation to breast cancer survival. Breast Cancer Res Treat 122: 823-833, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Bayraktar S,
    2. Hernadez-Aya LF,
    3. Lei X,
    4. Meric-Bernstam F,
    5. Litton JK,
    6. Hsu L,
    7. Hortobagyi GN,
    8. Gonzalez-Angulo AM
    : Effect of metformin on survival outcomes in diabetic patients with triple receptor-negative breast cancer. Cancer 118: 1202-1211, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Hancock SL,
    2. McDougall IR,
    3. Constine LS
    : Thyroid abnormalities after therapeutic external radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Physics 31(5): 1165-1170, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Jazvić M,
    2. Prpić M,
    3. Jukić T,
    4. Murgić J,
    5. Jakšić B,
    6. Kust D,
    7. Prgomet A,
    8. Bolanča A,
    9. Kusić Z
    : Sunitinib-induced thyrotoxicosis – a not so rare entity. Anticancer Res 35(1): 481-485, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Rupa-Matysek J,
    2. Gil L,
    3. Komarnicki M
    : Thrombotic complications following the treatment of multiple myeloma with new agents. Pol Merkur Lekarski 31(186): 372-377, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Tan Q,
    2. Wang W,
    3. Long Y,
    4. Chen G
    : Therapeutic effects and associated adverse events of multikinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 9(6): 2275-2280, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Leung HW,
    2. Chan AL
    : Multikinase inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Indirect comparison meta-analysis. Clin Ther 33(6): 708-716, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Martin LG,
    2. Silva MD
    : Chemotherapy induced peripheral neuroparhy: A literature review. Einstein 9(4 Pt 1): 538-544, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Driessen CM,
    2. de Kleine-Bolt KM,
    3. Vingerhoets AJ,
    4. Mols F,
    5. Vreugdenhil G
    : Assesssing the impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity on the quality of life of cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 20(4): 877-881, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Jaggi AS,
    2. Singh N
    : Mechanisms in cancer-chemotherapeutic drugs-induced peripheral neuropathy. Toxicology 291(1-3): 1-9, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Lustberg MB,
    2. Reinbolt RE,
    3. Shapiro CL
    : Bone health in adult cancer survivorship. J Clin Oncol 30(30): 3665-3674, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Lim JS,
    2. Kim SB,
    3. Bang HY,
    4. Cheon GJ,
    5. Lee JI
    : High prevalence of osteoporosis in patients with gastric adenocarcinoma following gastrectomy. World J Gastroenterol 13: 6492-6497, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Mascia F,
    2. Mariani V,
    3. Girolomoni G,
    4. Pastore S
    : Blockade of the EGF receptor induces a deranged chemokine expression in keratinocytes leading to enhanced skin in ammation. Am J Pathol 163: 303-312, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Robert C,
    2. Soria JC,
    3. Spatz A,
    4. Le Cesne A,
    5. Malka D,
    6. Pautier P,
    7. Wechsler J,
    8. Lhomme C,
    9. Escudier B,
    10. Boige V,
    11. Armand JP,
    12. Le Chevalier T
    : Cutaneous side-effects of kinase inhibitors and blocking antibodies. Lancet Oncol 6: 491-500, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Scope A,
    2. Agero AL,
    3. Dusza SW,
    4. Myskowski PL,
    5. Lieb JA,
    6. Saltz L,
    7. Kemeny NE,
    8. Halpern AC
    : Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximab-associated acne- like eruption. J Clin Oncol 25: 5390-5396, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Fyfe AJ,
    2. McKay P
    : Toxicities associated with bleomycin. J R Coll Physicians Edinb 40(3): 213-215, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Perazella MA
    : Onco-nephrology: renal toxicities of chemotherapeutic agents. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 7(10): 1713-1721, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Nam RK,
    2. Cheung P,
    3. Herschorn S,
    4. Saskin R,
    5. Su J,
    6. Klotz LH,
    7. Chang M,
    8. Kulkarni GS,
    9. Lee Y,
    10. Kodama RT,
    11. Narod SA
    : Incidence of complications other than urinary incontinence or erectile dysfunction after radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: A population-based cohort study. Lancet Oncol 15(2): 223-231, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Numico G,
    2. Longo V,
    3. Courthod G,
    4. Silvestris N
    : Cancer survivorship: long-term side-effects of anticancer treatments of gastrointestinal cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 27(4): 351-357, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Tocchetti CG,
    2. Gallucci G,
    3. Coppola C,
    4. Piscopo G,
    5. Cipresso C,
    6. Maurea C,
    7. Giudice A,
    8. Iaffaioli RV,
    9. Arra C,
    10. Maurea N
    : The emerging issue of cardiac dysfunction induced by antineoplastic angiogenesis inhibitors. Eur J Heart Fail 15(5): 482-489, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Cardinale D,
    2. Sandri MT
    : Role of biomarkers in chemotherapy induced cardiotoxicity. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 53: 121, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Scott JM,
    2. Khakoo A,
    3. Mackey JR,
    4. Haykowsky MJ,
    5. Douglas PS,
    6. Jones LW
    : Modulation of anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity by aerobic exercise in breast cancer: Current evidence and underlying mechanisms. Circulation 124(5): 642-650, 2011.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Scott JM,
    2. Lakoski S,
    3. Mackey JR,
    4. Douglas PS,
    5. Haykowsky MJ,
    6. Jones LW
    : The potential role of aerobic exercise to modulate cardiotoxicity of molecularly targeted cancer therapeutics. Oncologist 18(2): 221-231, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Matteucci P,
    2. Carlo-Stella C,
    3. Di Nicola M,
    4. Magni M,
    5. Guidetti A,
    6. Marchesi M,
    7. Gianni AM
    : Topical prophylaxis of conjunctivitis induced by high-dose cytosine arabinoside. Haematologica 91(2): 255-257, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Garcia DO,
    2. Thomson CA
    : Physical activity and cancer survivorship. Nutr Clin Pract 29(6): 768-779, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Stull VB,
    2. Snyder DC,
    3. Demark-Wahnefried W
    : Lifestyle interventions in cancer survivors: Designing programs that meet the needs of this vulnerable and growing population. J. Nutr 137: 243S-248S, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. James EL,
    2. Stacey FG,
    3. Chapman K,
    4. Boyes AW,
    5. Burrows T,
    6. Girgis A,
    7. Asprey G,
    8. Bisquera A,
    9. Lubans DR
    : Impact of a nutrition and physical activity intervention (ENRICH: Exercise and Nutrition Routine Improving Cancer Health) on health behaviors of cancer survivors and careers: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer 15: 710, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Lynch BM
    : Sedentary behavior and cancer: a systematic review of the literature and proposed biological mechanisms. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Pre 19: 2691-2709, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Hershman DL,
    2. Lacchetti C,
    3. Dworkin RH,
    4. Lavoie Smith EM,
    5. Bleeker J,
    6. Cavaletti G,
    7. Chauhan C,
    8. Gavin P,
    9. Lavino A,
    10. Lustberg MB,
    11. Paice J,
    12. Schneider B,
    13. Smith ML,
    14. Smith T,
    15. Terstriep S,
    16. Wagner-Johnston N,
    17. Bak K,
    18. Loprinzi CL,
    19. American Society of Clinical Oncology
    : Prevention and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of adult cancers: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 32(18): 1941-1967, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  67. ↵
    1. Brown J,
    2. Su Y,
    3. Nelleson D,
    4. Shankar P,
    5. Mayo C
    : Management of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor-associated rash: A systematic review. J Community Support Oncol 14: 21-28, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Petrelli F,
    2. Borgonovo K,
    3. Cabiddu M,
    4. Coinu A,
    5. Ghilardi M,
    6. Lonati V,
    7. Barni S
    : Antibiotic prophylaxis for skin toxicity induced by anti-EGFR agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 175(6): 1166-1174, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Petrelli F,
    2. Borgonovo K,
    3. Barni S
    : Preventing or treating anti-EGFR related skin rash with antibiotics? Ann Transl Med 4(16): 312, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 9
September 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physical Needs of Long-term Cancer Patients
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Physical Needs of Long-term Cancer Patients
PAOLO TRALONGO, MARIA GIOVANNA PESCARENICO, ANTONELLA SURBONE, SEBASTIANO BORDONARO, MASSIMILIANO BERRETTA, ANNAMARIA DI MARI
Anticancer Research Sep 2017, 37 (9) 4733-4746;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Physical Needs of Long-term Cancer Patients
PAOLO TRALONGO, MARIA GIOVANNA PESCARENICO, ANTONELLA SURBONE, SEBASTIANO BORDONARO, MASSIMILIANO BERRETTA, ANNAMARIA DI MARI
Anticancer Research Sep 2017, 37 (9) 4733-4746;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Needs
    • How to Identify and Treat Needs
    • Follow-up and Prevention Intervention
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Unmet needs and opportunities for improving care for patients with advanced lung cancer on targeted therapies: a qualitative study
  • Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Timing of Anthracyclines and Trastuzumab Cardiac Toxicity
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • survivorship
  • cancer
  • treatment
  • toxicity
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire