Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Discrepancy in Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Between Primary and Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

SHINKICHI TAKAMORI, GOUJI TOYOKAWA, ISAMU OKAMOTO, KAZUKI TAKADA, YUKA KOZUMA, TAICHI MATSUBARA, NAOKI HARATAKE, TAKAKI AKAMINE, MASAKAZU KATSURA, NOBUTAKA MUKAE, FUMIHIRO SHOJI, TATSURO OKAMOTO, YOSHINAO ODA, TORU IWAKI, KOJI IIHARA, YOICHI NAKANISHI and YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research August 2017, 37 (8) 4223-4228;
SHINKICHI TAKAMORI
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GOUJI TOYOKAWA
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gouji104kawa{at}gmail.com
ISAMU OKAMOTO
2Research Institute for Disease of the Chest Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KAZUKI TAKADA
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
3Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUKA KOZUMA
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAICHI MATSUBARA
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAOKI HARATAKE
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAKI AKAMINE
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAKAZU KATSURA
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NOBUTAKA MUKAE
4Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FUMIHIRO SHOJI
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TATSURO OKAMOTO
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHINAO ODA
3Department of Anatomic Pathology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TORU IWAKI
5Department of Neuropathology, Neurological Institute, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOJI IIHARA
4Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOICHI NAKANISHI
2Research Institute for Disease of the Chest Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
1Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the discordance in the programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression between primary and metastatic tumors and analyze the association between the discordance and the clinical factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Patients and Methods: Twenty-one NSCLC patients who underwent surgery or biopsy for paired primary and metastatic lesions at our Institution from 2005 to 2016 were analyzed. Lesions with the PD-L1 expression being ≥5% were considered PD-L1-positive. Results: The metastatic sites included the brain (n=16), adrenal gland (n=3), spleen (n=1) and jejunum (n=1). Negative conversion of the primary PD-L1-positive NSCLC and positive conversion of the primary PD-L1-negative NSCLC were observed in 3 (14%) and 2 (10%) cases, respectively. Radiotherapy for the metastatic brain lesion before its resection showed a significant relationship with the positive conversion of the primary PD-L1-negative NSCLC (p=0.048). Conclusion: Radiotherapy-derived effects may contribute to the positive conversion of the primary PD-L1-negative NSCLC.

  • Programmed cell death-ligand 1
  • immunotherapy
  • non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), which accounts for 85-90% of lung cancer cases, is the most common form of disease (2). Recently, immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) has gathered a great deal of attention as a novel pharmacological treatment since immunotherapy was reported to be associated with significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in comparison to chemotherapy in patients with NSCLC in the CheckMate-017, CheckMate-057 and KEYNOTE-024 trials (3-5).

PD-L1 has been revealed to play a pivotal role in the suppression of the anti-tumor immune responses through its binding to the PD-1 receptor, which is expressed on activated T cells (6). Accordingly, the high expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells (TCs) has been shown to be associated with poor survival in patients with NSCLC (7, 8). Based on the results of clinical trials, the proportion of PD-L1-positive TCs is considered to be a predictive biomarker that can be used to select patients who will benefit from immunotherapy (3-5). Thus, assessing the expression of PD-L1 on the TCs is essential for determining the optimal therapeutic strategies for patients with NSCLC.

On the other hand, in clinical practice, the efficacy of pharmacotherapy, including immunotherapy, often differs between primary lung cancer and metastatic lesions – especially brain metastases (9). A recent study showed that heterogeneity in the expression of immune-markers depended on the metastatic sites and histological transformation (10). It is important to investigate the consistency of the PD-L1 expression in primary tumors and their metastatic lesions.

The aim of this study was to investigate the concordance in the expression of PD-L1 between primary lung cancer and metastatic lesions in NSCLC patients.

Patients and Methods

Patients. From January 2005 to December 2016, 15 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC and underwent surgical resection of both the primary lung cancer and the corresponding metastatic lesions at the Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences and Department of Neurosurgery, Kyushu University. In the same period, 6 patients were diagnosed with NSCLC based on the pathological examination of biopsy specimens and underwent the surgical resection of the metastatic tumors (alone) with curative intent or for the purpose of palliation. In total, 21 patients with NSCLC were enrolled in the present retrospective study. The variables that were included in this retrospective analysis included age, sex, smoking status (pack year index) and performance status. In the present study, the clinical or pathological T and N stage, metastatic site, histopathological subtype and EGFR mutation status of the primary tumor and the corresponding metastatic lesion were investigated. The clinical or pathological stage was determined according to the TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors (7th edition). We analyzed the procedure and therapy for the primary tumor, and local therapy for metastasis. We also investigated the simultaneity of the paired tumors. The present study was approved by our institution's review board.

Immunohistochemical analysis. The surgical or biopsy specimens of the primary tumors and the corresponding metastatic lesions of 21 patients were subjected to an immunohistochemical analysis, as described previously (7). An anti-human PD-L1 rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone SP142, dilution 1:100; Spring Bioscience, Ventana, Tucson, AZ, USA) was used as the primary antibody (7). The PD-L1 expression on the membrane of TCs was independently evaluated by a surgeon (S.T.) and a pathologist (K.T.). The percentage of the PD-L1-positive TCs was determined and classified into one of four categories (0%: <1%; 1%: 1-4%; 5%: 5-50%; 50%: >50%). Lesions in which ≥5% of the TCs were PD-L1-positive were considered to be positive (11).

Statistical analysis. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the association between the PD-L1 positivity of the primary lesions and the corresponding metastases. The relationship between clinical factors and PD-L1 discrepancy between the primary tumors and the corresponding metastases was also investigated using Fisher's exact test. p-Values of <0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. All of the analyses were performed using the JMP® 13 software program (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

The characteristics of the patients in the present study. Table I shows the characteristics of the patients who were enrolled in the present study. The median age was 63 years (range=29-79 years), and 17 (81%) of the patients were male. Eighteen (86%) were current and former smokers, and nine (43%) had ≥30-pack-year smoking history. The performance status of most patients (86%) was 0 or 1. The metastatic sites included the brain, n=16 (76%); adrenal gland, n=3 (14%); spleen n=1 (5%); and jejunum n=1 (5%). The diagnoses included adenocarcinoma, n=15 (72%); squamous cell carcinoma, n=4 (18%); and non-small cell lung cancer, n=2 (10%). The EGFR mutation statuses of the primary tumors and their corresponding metastases were consistent in all cases. None of the patients received molecular-targeted agents immediately before surgical resection. Fourteen patients (67%) underwent surgical resection of both the primary and metastatic tumors. In the remaining 7 (33%) patients, the primary lung cancer was biopsied and the metastatic tumors alone were surgically resected with curative intent or for palliation. Immediately before the surgical resection of the metastatic lesions, 5 patients (24%) received chemotherapy for the primary tumor, and two (10%) underwent radiotherapy for metastatic lesions (brain). Nine patients (43%) had metachronous lesions (the interval between the procedures for the primary and metastatic tumors were >6 months).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of 21 lung cancer patients with distant metastasis.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression in 21 primary tumors and their corresponding metastases (cut-off: 5%).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Relationship between the clinical factors and PD-L1 discrepancy between 21 primary tumors and their corresponding metastases.

Discordance in the PD-L1 expression of primary lung cancers and their corresponding metastases. Figure 1 shows the PD-L1 positivity or negativity of the 21 primary tumors and their corresponding metastases with a cut-off value of 5% (11). When the cut-off value of the proportion of PD-L1-positive TCs was set at 5% (11), 8 primary lesions (38%) and 7 metastases (33%) were classified as PD-L1-positive. The metastatic sites, EGFR mutation status and the presence or absence of radiotherapy/chemotherapy immediately before the surgical treatment of the metastatic lesions are also shown. The primary tumors of 8 of the 21 cases (38%) were positive for PD-L1. Among the 8 patients with PD-L1-positive primary lung cancer, the corresponding metastases were PD-L1-negative in 3 cases (38%). Among the 12 cases (57%) in which the primary lung tumor was PD-L1-negative, the corresponding metastatic lesions of two cases (17%) were PD-L1-positive. Discrepancy was observed in the PD-L1 expression of the primary tumors and their corresponding metastases in 5 of 21 cases (24%); the consistency was not statistically significant (p=0.056).

Relationship between the clinical factors and PD-L1 discrepancy between the primary tumors and their corresponding metastases. The association between the clinical factors and PD-L1 discrepancy between the primary tumors and the corresponding metastatic lesions is shown in Table II. The administration of radiotherapy for the metastatic brain lesion before its resection showed a significant relationship with discordance in the expression of PD-L1 (p=0.048). On the other hand, heavy smoking (pack year index ≥30), EGFR wild-type and the interval between the procedures for the primary and metastatic tumors were not associated with discrepancy in the expression of PD-L1 (p=0.119, p=0.278 and p=0.611, respectively).

Discussion

Patients with NSCLC often develop distant metastases either at the initial diagnosis or during the progression of the disease (2). Approximately 30-50% of NSCLC patients are expected to develop metastatic central nervous system (CNS) lesions at some point (12, 13). However, systemic therapy for CNS disease is associated with a low response rate due to various factors, including the blood-brain barrier, interstitial pressure and efflux pumps (14). In spite of the inadequate penetration of antitumor drugs, platinum-doublet or -triplet regimens are associated with response rates of 23-61.2% (15, 16). Moreover, there is a great deal of evidence to support the efficacy of EGFR- or ALK-TKIs in the treatment of CNS lesions – the response rate is reported to range from 52-82% (17-23). Regarding immunotherapy targeting PD-1/PD-L1, a previous phase-2 trial showed that the administration of pembrolizumab to treat brain metastases achieved an objective response rate of 33% (24). According to some case reports, the efficacy of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 drugs differs between primary lesion and their metastatic sites (9). It is unclear whether this discrepancy is due to the inadequate delivery of immunotherapeutic agents or the discordant expression of PD-L1 between the primary and metastatic tumors. Given that PD-L1 is a biomarker that can be used to select primary lung cancer patients who will benefit from anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1 agents (3-5), the investigation of the PD-L1 expression in metastatic lesions as well as primary lesions, and the elucidation of the concordance of the PD-L1 expression between primary and metastatic lesions is important for understanding why the efficacy of immunotherapy differs between primary and metastatic foci.

Although it is rare to find cases in which specimens of both the primary and metastatic tumors are available for an analysis to investigate the expression of PD-L1, some studies have focused on the disagreement in the PD-L1 expression of primary tumors and their metastatic lesions in NSCLC (11, 25). For example, Mansfield et al. reported that discordance was found in the expression of PD-L1 between primary lung cancer tumors and their corresponding metastatic brain lesions in 10 of 73 cases (14%); the level of PD-L1 expression was decreased in the metastatic tumors of 9 of the 10 cases (90%) (11). In the current study, PD-L1 discordance was found in 5 of 21 cases (24%), with 3 of the 5 cases (60%) showing a decreased level of PD-L1 expression at the metastatic site; this was in line with the results of these previous reports (11, 25). These data would partly explain why the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors differs between primary tumor and metastases (9).

Our study suggested that radiotherapy for the brain metastasis followed by intracranial surgery was significantly associated with conversion to PD-L1 positivity (p=0.048; Table II), although the sample size was very small. According to the recent pre-clinical studies, the PD-L1 expression on Kras tumor cells was upregulated after radiotherapy (26, 27). In addition, while the rate of PD-L1 positivity in NSCLC is reported to range from 24-57% (7), the rate of PD-L1 positivity in NSCLC patients who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy was >70% (28). In our study, both the patients who received local radiotherapy for brain metastases were converted and became PD-L1-positive (Figure 1; patient numbers 15 and 16). The two patients also received systemic chemotherapy, but one patient with brain metastasis who had received chemotherapy followed by intracranial surgery did not exhibit a positive conversion (Figure 1; patient number, 4). These data suggest that radiotherapy might induce PD-L1 positivity, even if the primary tumor does not express the PD-L1 protein.

Dudnik et al. reported the rare case of a patient whose primary and metastatic lesions showed different responses to nivolumab (progressive disease [primary] and stable disease [brain]) (9). According to the report, the patient underwent brain radiotherapy and was then treated with an anti-PD-1 drug. However, the PD-L1 expression was not analyzed in both primary lesions and brain lesions (9). Taking into account that the overexpression of PD-L1 was reported to be a biomarker for the response to PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies (30), our study may partly contribute to evidence of the efficacy of combining radiotherapy with the anti-PD-1 treatment. These findings might be of some help for clinicians to decide upon treatment strategies including the sequence of the therapies.

The present retrospective study is associated with several limitations. First, this study investigated a small cohort of patients with heterogeneous metastatic lesions. Even though it should be emphasized that the paired primary and metastatic samples are rarely available in individual patients, the small number of the cases makes it difficult to draw definite conclusions. Second, we used six biopsy specimens (29%) to assess the PD-L1 expression in primary lung cancer. While Kitazono et al. showed that the concordance rate of PD-L1 positivity between biopsy samples and resected specimens was 92% (31). Ilie et al. reported that the concordance rate was 52% (32). Given this discrepancy, surgically resected specimens would seem preferable for this kind of study.

With regard to another limitation associated with the technical methods, we analyzed only the PD-L1 expression on TCs. Because the PD-L1 expression on TCs is a reliable biomarker to predict the response to checkpoint blockades, this method may be appropriate to discuss the discrepant efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors between primary and metastatic tumors (33, 34). However, some previous reports have shown that tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) were significantly associated with outcomes in patients treated with checkpoint blockades (35). In addition, the PD-L1 expression on immune cells, but not on TCs, was reported to be related to favorable prognosis in head and neck cancer patients (36). Thus, the investigation of TILs in primary and metastatic tumors is necessary in future studies.

In conclusion, discordance in the expression of PD-L1 between primary lesions and their corresponding metastases was observed in 24% of the cases in the present study. Radiotherapy-derived effects may partly explain the discrepancy in the expression of PD-L1. Further studies are necessary to validate these findings.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Brian T. Quinn for his critical comments on the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    Yoichi Nakanishi has received honoraria and research funding from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. Isamu Okamoto has received honoraria from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. All remaining authors declare no conflicts of interest.

  • Received June 14, 2017.
  • Revision received July 2, 2017.
  • Accepted July 3, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Torre LA,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Lortet-Tieulent J,
    6. Jemal A
    : Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 87-108, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Ettinger DS,
    2. Akerley W,
    3. Bepler G,
    4. Blum MG,
    5. Chang A,
    6. Cheney RT,
    7. Chirieac LR,
    8. D'Amico TA,
    9. Demmy TL,
    10. Ganti AK,
    11. Govindan R,
    12. Grannis FW Jr..,
    13. Jahan T,
    14. Jahanzeb M,
    15. Johnson DH,
    16. Kessinger A,
    17. Komaki R,
    18. Kong FM,
    19. Kris MG,
    20. Krug LM,
    21. Le QT,
    22. Lennes IT,
    23. Martins R,
    24. O'Malley J,
    25. Osarogiagbon RU,
    26. Otterson GA,
    27. Patel JD,
    28. Pisters KM,
    29. Reckamp K,
    30. Riely GJ,
    31. Rohren E,
    32. Simon GR,
    33. Swanson SJ,
    34. Wood DE,
    35. Yang SC
    : Non-small cell lung cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 8: 740-801, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Brahmer J,
    2. Reckamp KL,
    3. Baas P,
    4. Crino L,
    5. Eberhardt WE,
    6. Poddubskaya E,
    7. Antonia S,
    8. Pluzanski A,
    9. Vokes EE,
    10. Holgado E,
    11. Waterhouse D,
    12. Ready N,
    13. Gainor J,
    14. Aren Frontera O,
    15. Havel L,
    16. Steins M,
    17. Garassino MC,
    18. Aerts JG,
    19. Domine M,
    20. Paz-Ares L,
    21. Reck M,
    22. Baudelet C,
    23. Harbison CT,
    24. Lestini B,
    25. Spigel DR
    : Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced squamous-cell non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373: 123-135, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Borghaei H,
    2. Paz-Ares L,
    3. Horn L,
    4. Spigel DR,
    5. Steins M,
    6. Ready NE,
    7. Chow LQ,
    8. Vokes EE,
    9. Felip E,
    10. Holgado E,
    11. Barlesi F,
    12. Kohlhaufl M,
    13. Arrieta O,
    14. Burgio MA,
    15. Fayette J,
    16. Lena H,
    17. Poddubskaya E,
    18. Gerber DE,
    19. Gettinger SN,
    20. Rudin CM,
    21. Rizvi N,
    22. Crino L,
    23. Blumenschein GR Jr..,
    24. Antonia SJ,
    25. Dorange C,
    26. Harbison CT,
    27. Graf Finckenstein F,
    28. Brahmer JR
    : Nivolumab versus docetaxel in advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 373: 1627-1639, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Reck M,
    2. Rodriguez-Abreu D,
    3. Robinson AG,
    4. Hui R,
    5. Csoszi T,
    6. Fulop A,
    7. Gottfried M,
    8. Peled N,
    9. Tafreshi A,
    10. Cuffe S,
    11. O'Brien M,
    12. Rao S,
    13. Hotta K,
    14. Leiby MA,
    15. Lubiniecki GM,
    16. Shentu Y,
    17. Rangwala R,
    18. Brahmer JR
    : Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375: 1823-1833, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Pardoll DM
    : The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 252-264, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Takada K,
    2. Okamoto T,
    3. Shoji F,
    4. Shimokawa M,
    5. Akamine T,
    6. Takamori S,
    7. Katsura M,
    8. Suzuki Y,
    9. Fujishita T,
    10. Toyokawa G,
    11. Morodomi Y,
    12. Okano S,
    13. Oda Y,
    14. Maehara Y
    : Clinical significance of PD-L1 protein expression in aurgically resected primary lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 11: 1879-1890, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Sun JM,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Choi YL,
    4. Choi SJ,
    5. Kim SE,
    6. Wang Z,
    7. Dolled-Filhart M,
    8. Emancipator K,
    9. Wu D,
    10. Weiner R,
    11. Frisman D,
    12. Kim HK,
    13. Choi YS,
    14. Shim YM,
    15. Kim J
    : Prognostic significance of PD-L1 in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a large cohort study of surgically resected cases. J Thorac Oncol 11: 1003-1011, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dudnik E,
    2. Yust-Katz S,
    3. Nechushtan H,
    4. Goldstein DA,
    5. Zer A,
    6. Flex D,
    7. Siegal T,
    8. Peled N
    : Intracranial response to nivolumab in NSCLC patients with untreated or progressing CNS metastases. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 98: 114-117, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Suda K,
    2. Murakami I,
    3. Yu H,
    4. Kim J,
    5. Ellison K,
    6. Rivard CJ,
    7. Mitsudomi T,
    8. Hirsch FR
    : Heterogeneity in Immune Marker Expression after acquisition of resistance to EGFR kinase inhibitors: analysis of a case with small cell lung cancer transformation. J Thorac Oncol 12: 1015-1020, 2017.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Mansfield AS,
    2. Aubry MC,
    3. Moser JC,
    4. Harrington SM,
    5. Dronca RS,
    6. Park SS,
    7. Dong H
    : Temporal and spatial discordance of programmed cell death-ligand 1 expression and lymphocyte tumor infiltration between paired primary lesions and brain metastases in lung cancer. Ann Oncol 27: 1953-1958, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Nayak L,
    2. Lee EQ,
    3. Wen PY
    : Epidemiology of brain metastases. Current oncology reports 14: 48-54, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chao JH,
    2. Phillips R,
    3. Nickson JJ
    : Roentgen-ray therapy of cerebral metastases. Cancer 7: 682-689, 1954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pitz MW,
    2. Desai A,
    3. Grossman SA,
    4. Blakeley JO
    : Tissue concentration of systemically administered antineoplastic agents in human brain tumors. J Neurooncol 104: 629-638, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Zimmermann S,
    2. Dziadziuszko R,
    3. Peters S
    : Indications and limitations of chemotherapy and targeted agents in non-small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Cancer Treat Rev 40: 716-722, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Besse B,
    2. Le Moulec S,
    3. Mazieres J,
    4. Senellart H,
    5. Barlesi F,
    6. Chouaid C,
    7. Dansin E,
    8. Berard H,
    9. Falchero L,
    10. Gervais R,
    11. Robinet G,
    12. Ruppert AM,
    13. Schott R,
    14. Lena H,
    15. Clement-Duchene C,
    16. Quantin X,
    17. Souquet PJ,
    18. Tredaniel J,
    19. Moro-Sibilot D,
    20. Perol M,
    21. Madroszyk AC,
    22. Soria JC
    : Bevacizumab in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer and asymptomatic, Untreated Brain Metastases (BRAIN): A Nonrandomized, Phase II Study. Clin Cancer Res 21: 1896-1903, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Hata A,
    2. Katakami N
    : Afatinib for Erlotinib Refractory Brain Metastases in a patient with EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: can high-affinity TKI substitute for high-dose TKI? J Thorac Oncol 10: e65-66, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Bai H,
    2. Han B
    : The effectiveness of erlotinib against brain metastases in non-small cell lung cancer patients. Am J Clin Oncol 36: 110-115, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gainor JF,
    2. Chi AS,
    3. Logan J,
    4. Hu R,
    5. Oh KS,
    6. Brastianos PK,
    7. Shih HA,
    8. Shaw AT
    : Alectinib dose escalation reinduces central nervous system responses in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer relapsing on standard dose alectinib. J Thorac Oncol 11: 256-260, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gainor JF,
    2. Sherman CA,
    3. Willoughby K,
    4. Logan J,
    5. Kennedy E,
    6. Brastianos PK,
    7. Chi AS,
    8. Shaw AT
    : Alectinib salvages CNS relapses in ALK-positive lung cancer patients previously treated with crizotinib and ceritinib. J Thorac Oncol 10: 232-236, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Toyokawa G,
    2. Seto T,
    3. Takenoyama M,
    4. Ichinose Y
    : Insights into brain metastasis in patients with ALK+ lung cancer: is the brain truly a sanctuary? Cancer Metastasis Rev 34: 797-805, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gadgeel SM,
    2. Gandhi L,
    3. Riely GJ,
    4. Chiappori AA,
    5. West HL,
    6. Azada MC,
    7. Morcos PN,
    8. Lee RM,
    9. Garcia L,
    10. Yu L,
    11. Boisserie F,
    12. Di Laurenzio L,
    13. Golding S,
    14. Sato J,
    15. Yokoyama S,
    16. Tanaka T,
    17. Ou SH
    : Safety and activity of alectinib against systemic disease and brain metastases in patients with crizotinib-resistant ALK-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (AF-002JG): results from the dose-finding portion of a phase 1/2 study. Lancet Oncol 15: 1119-1128, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Porta R,
    2. Sanchez-Torres JM,
    3. Paz-Ares L,
    4. Massuti B,
    5. Reguart N,
    6. Mayo C,
    7. Lianes P,
    8. Queralt C,
    9. Guillem V,
    10. Salinas P,
    11. Catot S,
    12. Isla D,
    13. Pradas A,
    14. Gurpide A,
    15. de Castro J,
    16. Polo E,
    17. Puig T,
    18. Taron M,
    19. Colomer R,
    20. Rosell R
    : Brain metastases from lung cancer responding to erlotinib: the importance of EGFR mutation. Eur Respir J 37: 624-631, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Goldberg SB,
    2. Gettinger SN,
    3. Mahajan A,
    4. Chiang AC,
    5. Herbst RS,
    6. Sznol M,
    7. Tsiouris AJ,
    8. Cohen J,
    9. Vortmeyer A,
    10. Jilaveanu L,
    11. Yu J,
    12. Hegde U,
    13. Speaker S,
    14. Madura M,
    15. Ralabate A,
    16. Rivera A,
    17. Rowen E,
    18. Gerrish H,
    19. Yao X,
    20. Chiang V,
    21. Kluger HM
    : Pembrolizumab for patients with melanoma or non-small-cell lung cancer and untreated brain metastases: early analysis of a non-randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17: 976-983, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Kim MY,
    2. Koh J,
    3. Kim S,
    4. Go H,
    5. Jeon YK,
    6. Chung DH
    : Clinicopathological analysis of PD-L1 and PD-L2 expression in pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma: Comparison with tumor-infiltrating T cells and the status of oncogenic drivers. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 88: 24-33, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Herter-Sprie GS,
    2. Koyama S,
    3. Korideck H,
    4. Hai J,
    5. Deng J,
    6. Li YY,
    7. Buczkowski KA,
    8. Grant AK,
    9. Ullas S,
    10. Rhee K,
    11. Cavanaugh JD,
    12. Neupane NP,
    13. Christensen CL,
    14. Herter JM,
    15. Makrigiorgos GM,
    16. Hodi FS,
    17. Freeman GJ,
    18. Dranoff G,
    19. Hammerman PS,
    20. Kimmelman AC,
    21. Wong KK
    : Synergy of radiotherapy and PD-1 blockade in Kras-mutant lung cancer. JCI insight 1: e87415, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  21. ↵
    1. Gong X,
    2. Li X,
    3. Jiang T,
    4. Xie H,
    5. Zhu Z,
    6. Zhou F,
    7. Zhou C
    : Combined radiotherapy and anti-PD-L1 antibody synergistically enhances antitumor effect in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 12: 1085-1097, 2017.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Tokito T,
    2. Azuma K,
    3. Kawahara A,
    4. Ishii H,
    5. Yamada K,
    6. Matsuo N,
    7. Kinoshita T,
    8. Mizukami N,
    9. Ono H,
    10. Kage M,
    11. Hoshino T
    : Predictive relevance of PD-L1 expression combined with CD8+ TIL density in stage III non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Eur J Cancer 55: 7-14, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Dagogo-Jack I,
    2. Lanfranchi M,
    3. Gainor JF,
    4. Giobbie-Hurder A,
    5. Lawrence DP,
    6. Shaw AT,
    7. Sullivan RJ
    : A Retrospective analysis of the efficacy of pembrolizumab in melanoma patients with brain metastasis. J Immunother 40: 108-113, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Meng X,
    2. Huang Z,
    3. Teng F,
    4. Xing L,
    5. Yu J
    : Predictive biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 41: 868-876, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Kitazono S,
    2. Fujiwara Y,
    3. Tsuta K,
    4. Utsumi H,
    5. Kanda S,
    6. Horinouchi H,
    7. Nokihara H,
    8. Yamamoto N,
    9. Sasada S,
    10. Watanabe S,
    11. Asamura H,
    12. Tamura T,
    13. Ohe Y
    : Reliability of small biopsy samples compared with resected specimens for the determination of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in non--small-cell lung cancer. Clinical Lung Cancer 16: 385-390, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ilie M,
    2. Long-Mira E,
    3. Bence C,
    4. Butori C,
    5. Lassalle S,
    6. Bouhlel L,
    7. Fazzalari L,
    8. Zahaf K,
    9. Lalvee S,
    10. Washetine K,
    11. Mouroux J,
    12. Venissac N,
    13. Poudenx M,
    14. Otto J,
    15. Sabourin JC,
    16. Marquette CH,
    17. Hofman V,
    18. Hofman P
    : Comparative study of the PD-L1 status between surgically resected specimens and matched biopsies of NSCLC patients reveal major discordances: a potential issue for anti-PD-L1 therapeutic strategies. Ann Oncol 27: 147-153, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Reck M,
    2. Rodriguez-Abreu D,
    3. Robinson AG,
    4. Hui R,
    5. Csoszi T,
    6. Fulop A,
    7. Gottfried M,
    8. Peled N,
    9. Tafreshi A,
    10. Cuffe S,
    11. O'Brien M,
    12. Rao S,
    13. Hotta K,
    14. Leiby MA,
    15. Lubiniecki GM,
    16. Shentu Y,
    17. Rangwala R,
    18. Brahmer JR
    : Pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for PD-L1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 375: 1823-1833, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Meng X,
    2. Huang Z,
    3. Teng F,
    4. Xing L,
    5. Yu J
    : Predictive biomarkers in PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint blockade immunotherapy. Cancer Treat Rev 41: 868-876, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Shien K,
    2. Papadimitrakopoulou VA,
    3. Wistuba II
    : Predictive biomarkers of response to PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 99: 79-87, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kim HR,
    2. Ha SJ,
    3. Hong MH,
    4. Heo SJ,
    5. Koh YW,
    6. Choi EC,
    7. Kim EK,
    8. Pyo KH,
    9. Jung I,
    10. Seo D,
    11. Choi J,
    12. Cho BC,
    13. Yoon SO
    : PD-L1 expression on immune cells, but not on tumor cells, is a favorable prognostic factor for head and neck cancer patients. Sci Rep 6: 36956, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 8
August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Discrepancy in Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Between Primary and Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Discrepancy in Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Between Primary and Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
SHINKICHI TAKAMORI, GOUJI TOYOKAWA, ISAMU OKAMOTO, KAZUKI TAKADA, YUKA KOZUMA, TAICHI MATSUBARA, NAOKI HARATAKE, TAKAKI AKAMINE, MASAKAZU KATSURA, NOBUTAKA MUKAE, FUMIHIRO SHOJI, TATSURO OKAMOTO, YOSHINAO ODA, TORU IWAKI, KOJI IIHARA, YOICHI NAKANISHI, YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research Aug 2017, 37 (8) 4223-4228;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Discrepancy in Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 1 Between Primary and Metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
SHINKICHI TAKAMORI, GOUJI TOYOKAWA, ISAMU OKAMOTO, KAZUKI TAKADA, YUKA KOZUMA, TAICHI MATSUBARA, NAOKI HARATAKE, TAKAKI AKAMINE, MASAKAZU KATSURA, NOBUTAKA MUKAE, FUMIHIRO SHOJI, TATSURO OKAMOTO, YOSHINAO ODA, TORU IWAKI, KOJI IIHARA, YOICHI NAKANISHI, YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research Aug 2017, 37 (8) 4223-4228;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Radiological Features of Programmed Cell Death-Ligand 2-positive Lung Adenocarcinoma: A Single-institution Retrospective Study
  • PD-L2 Expression as a Potential Predictive Biomarker for the Response to Anti-PD-1 Drugs in Patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Clinical Significance of PD-L1 Expression in Brain Metastases from Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Real-world Patterns and Trends of Intravesical Chemotherapy for Non-muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer: Insights from a Large Prospective German Cohort
  • Dual Modality and Site-differentiated Sentinel Node Mapping in Vulvar Cancer
  • Pembrolizumab and Quality of Life in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • programmed cell death-ligand 1
  • immunotherapy
  • Non-small cell lung cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire