Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

WNT/β-Catenin Signaling Inhibitor IC-2 Suppresses Sphere Formation and Sensitizes Colorectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil

SHOICHI URUSHIBARA, TOSHIAKI TSUBOTA, RYOMA ASAI, JUNYA AZUMI, KEIGO ASHIDA, YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA and GOSHI SHIOTA
Anticancer Research August 2017, 37 (8) 4085-4091;
SHOICHI URUSHIBARA
1Division of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine and Regenerative Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
2Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIAKI TSUBOTA
1Division of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine and Regenerative Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYOMA ASAI
1Division of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine and Regenerative Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUNYA AZUMI
1Division of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine and Regenerative Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEIGO ASHIDA
2Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA
2Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
GOSHI SHIOTA
1Division of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Department of Genetic Medicine and Regenerative Therapeutics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tottori University Faculty of Medicine, Yonago, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: gshiota{at}med.tottori-u.ac.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/Aim: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most malignant types of cancer worldwide. Recent studies suggest that a small subpopulation of cells, so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs), promote the high metastasis and relapse associated with CRC. WNT/β-catenin signaling plays a critical role in CSC maintenance. Therefore, its inhibitor may suppress CSCs and improve therapeutic effects on CRC. Materials and Methods: The effects of a derivative of WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibitor, IC-2, which we recently developed, on the CRC cell line DLD-1, were examined by luciferase reporter assay, WST assay, western blot, and sphere assay. Results: The reporter assay showed that IC-2 reduced WNT/β-catenin transcriptional activity in DLD-1 cells. Notably, IC-2 reduced expression levels of CSC marker proteins, as well as sphere formation. In addition, IC-2 increasesd cytotoxicity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in DLD-1 cells. Conclusion: These results suggest that the combination treatment of IC-2 and 5-FU can stimulate tumor-suppressive effects on CRC.

  • Colorectal cancer
  • WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibitor
  • cancer stem cells
  • small molecule compound
  • 5-fluorouracil

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancer types in the world and carries the second highest mortality rate (1). Although initial events in CRC are relatively well studied and treatment for early-stage disease has significantly improved over the past decades, the mechanisms of metastasis and relapse, which are the main causes of death, remain poorly characterized (2). Currently, no effective therapy is available for advanced or metastatic disease and the survival rate at 5 years of follow-up is approximately 50% (3). Thus, a novel therapeutic strategy is urgently required for improving the clinical outcome of CRC.

Recent studies suggest that a small subpopulation of cells, so-called cancer stem cells (CSCs), possess high tumorigenicity (4-6). CSCs have the unique features of self-renewal and asymmetrical division, and are resistant to radio- and chemotherapy (7, 8). The CSCs remaining after conventional therapies may promote the high metastasis and relapse of CRC. Therefore, suppression of CSCs is considered a promising approach to improve therapeutic effects on many types of cancers including CRC.

Most CRCs carry somatic mutations in one of two genes, adenomatous polyposis coli (APC) and β-catenin (CTNNB1) (9-11). Defect of these genes activates the canonical wingless-type MMTV integration site family (WNT)/β-catenin signaling pathway. It has been shown that the WNT/β-catenin signaling regulates expression levels of CSC marker genes and is essential for maintenance of the undifferentiated status and self-renewal capability of CSCs (12-14). Since we recently developed a derivative of a WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibitor, IC-2, which efficiently suppresses WNT/β-catenin transcriptional activity and induces hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (15, 16), we explored its effect on colorectal cancer cells.

Materials and Methods

Small molecular compounds. We recently developed WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibitors. IC-2, a derivative of ICG-001, efficiently represses WNT/β-catenin signaling and most effectively induces hepatic differentiation of human MSCs (16). The DNA/RNA synthesis inhibitor, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was purchased from Nacalai tesque inc. (Kyoto, Japan). The compounds were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), of which the final concentration was 1%, and used in the experiments.

Cells and culture. Human CRC cell line DLD-1 was provided by Tohoku Univ. Cell Resource Center (Sendai, Japan). The cells were incubated in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (DMEM; Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 1% penicillin streptomycin, 2 mM L-glutamine, 0.2% NaHCO3 and 3.5 g/l D-glucose with or without chemical compounds (DMSO, 5-FU and IC-2).

Luciferase reporter assay. DLD-1 cells were seeded onto a 24-well plate at a density of 5×104 cells/well. After overnight incubation, the cells were transfected with pTCF4-CMVpro-Fluc plasmid to measure TCF4/beta-catenin transcriptional activity with pRL-CMV-Rluc plasmids (18) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for 4 h, and then treated with different concentrations of compounds (DMSO, 5-FU and IC-2) for 48 h. The luciferase activity was measured by Dual-LuciferaseR Reporter assay system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) and Mini-Lumat LB 9506 (Berthold Technologies, Bad Wildbad, Germany).

WST assay. DLD-1 cells were seeded onto a 96-well plate at a density of 5.0×103 cells/well. After overnight incubation, the cells were treated with different concentrations of compounds (DMSO, 5-FU and IC-2). Cell viability was analyzed by WST assay using Cell Counting kit-8 (Dojindo, Kumamoto, Japan) and Micro plate reader (Tecan, Mannedorf, Switzerland). The 50% cell growth-inhibitory concentration (IC50) for each compound was obtained from the following equation: IC50=10^[LOG(A/B)×(50−C)/(D−C) + LOG(B)], where A is the higher concentration of two values that sandwich the IC50; B is the lower concentration of two values that sandwich the IC50, C is cell viability (%) at B and D is a cell viability (%) at A.

Western blot analysis. Proteins from cell lysis (20 μg) were subjected to western blot assay. Mouse monoclonal antibody against CD44 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), mouse antibody against CD133 (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA, USA), rabbit monoclonal antibody against leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5; Abcam Ltd., Cambridge, UK), mouse monoclonal antibody against Nanog homeobox (NANOG; Cell Signaling Technology), rabbit monoclonal antibody against octamer-binding transcription factor 3/4 (OCT3/4; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) and goat polyclonal antibody against actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used. Actin served as an internal control.

Sphere formation assay. To examine sphere formation, 5×103 DLD-1 cells were incubated in serum-free media composed of DMEM/F12 (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, MO, USA) with 0.6% methylcellulose in ultra-low attachment plate (Corning Inc., Corning, NY, USA). The medium was supplemented with 20 ng/ml recombinant human epidermal growth factor, 20 ng/ml recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor, 1,000× leukemia inhibitory factor (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan), 4IU/ l Insulin(Biosource), 200 mmol/l L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Madison, MA, USA), and 100 Units/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Nacalai tesque, inc., Kyoto, Japan). The images were captured a Keyence microscope (×4) after 7 days'incubation. The number of spheres (>50 μm) were analyzed using ImageJ software (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U.S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.).

Statistical analysis. All values are the expressed as mean±SD. The differences between two groups were analyzed by an unpaired two-tailed Student's t-test. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Results

IC-2 inhibits TCF4/β-catenin transcriptional activity of CRC DLD-1 cells. In order to examine the effect of derivative of WNT/β-catenin signal inhibitor IC-2 on TCF4/β-catenin transcriptional activity in CRC cells, a luciferase reporter assay was performed using DLD-1 cells. The cells were treated with different concentrations of IC-2 or 5-FU for 48 h (Figure 1A). The reporter assay shows that IC-2 clearly suppressed the luciferase activity in a dose-dependent manner, whereas 5-FU had little effect, indicating that IC-2 has an inhibitory effect on WNT/β-catenin signal in DLD-1 cells (Figure 1A). Next, we investigated the effect of IC-2 and 5-FU on DLD-1 cell proliferation by WST assay. The cells were treated with different concentrations of agents for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h (Figure 1B). As previously reported (19), 5-FU reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1C). IC-2 did not affect viability at concentrations below 10 μM, whereas it reduced viability at higher concentrations (Figure 1C).

IC-2 reduces expression of CSC marker proteins. It has been reported that CSCs are highly resistant to conventional therapies and are responsible for recurrence and metastasis, suggesting that suppression of CSCs is important for cancer therapy. In order to examine the effect of WNT/β-catenin inhibitor on CSCs, we analyzed expression levels of CSC marker proteins CD44, CD133, OCT3/4, NANOG and LGR5. As shown in Figure 2, IC-2 reduced the levels of these CSC markers, suggesting that IC-2 may suppress CSCs in CRC cells.

IC-2 suppresses sphere formation activity of DLD-1 cells. To further investigate whether IC-2 suppresses CSCs in CRC cells, we next performed sphere formation assays by culturing cells for 7 days. To do this assay, we first determined the IC50 by WST assay. The IC50 of 5-FU and IC-2 were 2.2 μM and 21.5 μM, respectively (Figure 3A). Using these concentrations, we carried out the sphere assay. 5-FU reduced the number of sphere to about 60% compared to DMSO control (Figure 3B). Notably, IC-2 more greatly reduceded the sphere number compared to DMSO and 5-FU (Figure 3B), suggesting that IC-2 suppresses CSCs in CRC cells.

Next, we asked whether IC-2 could selectively target CSCs through WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibition. We isolated CSC marker CD44high and CD44low DLD-1 cells by cell sorting analysis and performed sphere assay with treatment with IC-2 or 5-FU. IC-2 reduced sphere numbers of CD44high cells to a greater extent compared with CD44low cells (Figure 3C), suggesting that IC-2 preferentially suppresses CSCs.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Small-molecule compound, IC-2, inhibits transcription factor 4 (TCF4)/β-catenin transcriptional activity and cell viability of DLD-1 colorectal cancer cells. A: TCF4/β-catenin transcriptional activity was examined by luciferase reporter assay in DLD-1 cells under treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU: 0-50 μM) and IC-2 (0-100 μM). Cell viability of DLD-1 cells analyzed by WST assay. Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of 5-FU and IC-2 for 0, 24, 48, and 72 h (B) or 48 h (C). Data are shown as mean±SD of three experiments. *p<0.05, compared to untreated cells (0 μM) by unpaired the Student's t-test.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

IC-2 reduces expression of cancer stem cell's marker proteins. Western blot analysis of DLD-1 cells treated with several concentrations of IC-2 for 7 days using antibodies to CD44, CD133, octamer-binding transcription factor 3/4(OCT3/4), Nanog homeobox (NANOG) and leucine rich repeat containing G protein-coupled receptor 5 (LGR5). Actin was used as an internal control.

IC-2 enhances the cytotoxicity of CRC cells to 5-FU. Suppression of CSCs by IC-2 treatment raised the possibility that IC-2 increases the cytotoxicity of conventional anticancer drugs, such as 5-FU. In order to test the effect of the combination treatment, DLD-1 cells were treated with 0 to 5 μM 5-FU alone and in combination with IC-2 (Figure 4). IC-2 was used at 10 μM, a concentration which showed no inhibitory effect on DLD-1 proliferation but did reduce expression of CSC markers (Figure 1A and 2). As shown in Figure 4, IC-2 moderately but significantly enhanced the cytotoxicity of 5-FU at concentrations above 2 μM (Figure 4). Together, these results suggest that IC-2 sensitizes CRC cells to 5-FU through suppression of CSCs.

Discussion

CSCs are involved in resistance to chemotherapy, metastasis formation, and cancer relapse (20). Therefore, targeting the CSCs is considered critical for improving therapeutic effect on cancers. Since WNT/β-catenin signaling plays a crucial role in CSC maintenance, it is an important target to pursue in the development of new therapeutic strategies. Herein, we show that the small molecule compound IC-2 represses WNT/β-catenin signaling in CRC cells. In addition, IC-2 reduces protein levels of CSC markers as well as sphere formation, suggesting that IC-2 has an inhibitory impact on CSCs. Furthermore, IC-2 sensitizes CRC cells to 5-FU, suggesting that the combination treatment of IC-2 and 5-FU can stimulate tumor-suppressive effects on CRC.

Using the IC50 value, IC-2 significantly reduced sphere forming ability to 20% compared to the control (Figure 3B). We have previously shown that IC-2 efficiently induces hepatic differentiation of human MSCs (15,16), thus IC-2 may also enhance differentiation of CSCs, which could contribute to inhibition of sphere formation. Since CSCs are relatively resistant to chemotherapy including 5-FU (21), if CSC differentiation is stimulated by IC-2, it may potentiate the sensitivity of CRC to 5-FU. Indeed, 10 μM IC-2, which did not affect proliferation but reduced expression levels of CSC marker proteins, significantly reduced cell viability in combination with 5-FU (Figure 4). These results suggest that IC-2 sensitizes CRC cells to 5-FU, at least in part, through enhancement of CSC differentiation (Figure 5).

In the present study, the factors that IC-2 interacts with remain elusive. IC-2 is a derivative of ICG-001 (16), which suppresses WNT/β-catenin signaling by binding to CREB-binding protein (22), suggesting that IC-2 may also interact with this protein. Therefore, the next challenge is to clarify the proteins that IC-2 interacts with and to uncover the molecular mechanism of WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibition.

Besides ICG-001, several approaches for targeting the components of the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway, such as tankyrases [XAV939 (23) and JW55 (24)], frizzled receptors[OMP-18R5 (25) and OMP-54F28 (26)], porcupine [LGK974 (27)], and CREB-binding protein [PRI-724 (28) and HC-1 (14)], have been developed. Notably, some of them are under evaluation in early-phase clinical trials. Therefore, it is important to test whether IC-2 is clinically safe in future study.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

IC-2 suppresses sphere formation by DLD-1 cells. A: WST assay of DLD-1 cells treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and IC-2 for 7 days. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of 5-FU and IC-2 were 2.2 and 21.5 μM, respectively. *p<0.05, compared to untreated cells (0 μM) by unpaired Student's t-test. B: Sphere formation assay of DLD-1 cells treated with 5-FU and IC-2 at IC50 for 7 days. Upper panel: Quantification of sphere numbers. Lower panel: Representative images of spheres. *p<0.05 by unpaired Student's t-test. C: Sphere formation assay of CD44high and CD44low DLD-1 cells treated with 5-FU and IC-2 at IC50. CD44high and CD44low DLD-1 cells were sorted by flow cytometry analysis and sphere assay was performed after 7 days. *p<0.05 by unpaired Student's t-test. Data are shown as the mean±SD of three experiments.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

IC-2 enhances the cytotoxicity of colorectal cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). A: Cells were treated with increasing concentrations of 5-FU alone or in combination with 10 μM IC-2 for 7 days. Cell viability was analyzed by WST assay. *p<0.05 by unpaired Student's t-test. Data are shown as the mean±SD of three experiments.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Model of the chemotherapeutic effect of combined treatment with IC-2 and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) on colorectal cancer cells. Our data suggest that IC-2 enhances differentiation of cancer stem cells (CSCs) into non-CSCs and sensitizes DLD-1 cells to 5-FU.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Dr. Sakabe T. for helpful discussion on this manuscript. This work was supported by a Management Expenses Grant from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received April 20, 2017.
  • Revision received June 17, 2017.
  • Accepted June 21, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Torre LA,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Siegel RL,
    4. Ferlay J,
    5. Lortet-Tieulent J,
    6. Jemal A
    : Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 87-108, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Massague J,
    2. Obenauf AC
    : Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells. Nature 529: 298-306, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Adam R,
    2. Haller DG,
    3. Poston G,
    4. Raoul JL,
    5. Spano JP,
    6. Tabernero J,
    7. Van Cutsem E
    : Toward optimized front-line therapeutic strategies in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer--an expert review from the International Congress on Anti-Cancer Treatment (ICACT) 2009. Ann Oncol 21: 1579-1584, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Reya T,
    2. Morrison SJ,
    3. Clarke MF,
    4. Weissman IL
    : Stem cells,cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature 414: 105-111, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shackleton M,
    2. Quintana E,
    3. Fearon ER,
    4. Morrison SJ
    : Heterogeneity in cancer: cancer stem cells versus clonal evolution. Cell 138: 822-829, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Meacham CE,
    2. Morrison SJ
    : Tumour heterogeneity and cancer cell plasticity. Nature 501: 328-337, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Jordan CT,
    2. Guzman ML,
    3. Noble M
    : Cancer stem cells. N Engl J Med 355: 1253-1261, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Cabrera MC,
    2. Hollingsworth RE,
    3. Hurt EM
    : Cancer stem cell plasticity and tumor hierarchy. World J Stem Cells 7: 27-36, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Brannon AR,
    2. Vakiani E,
    3. Sylvester BE,
    4. Scott SN,
    5. McDermott G,
    6. Shah RH,
    7. Kania K,
    8. Viale A,
    9. Oschwald DM,
    10. Vacic V,
    11. Emde AK,
    12. Cercek A,
    13. Yaeger R,
    14. Kemeny NE,
    15. Saltz LB,
    16. Shia J,
    17. D'Angelica MI,
    18. Weiser MR,
    19. Solit DB,
    20. Berger MF
    : Comparative sequencing analysis reveals high genomic concordance between matched primary and metastatic colorectal cancer lesions. Genome Biol 15: 454, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Matano M,
    2. Date S,
    3. Shimokawa M,
    4. Takano A,
    5. Fujii M,
    6. Ohta Y,
    7. Watanabe T,
    8. Kanai T,
    9. Sato T
    : Modeling colorectal cancer using CRISPR-CAS9-mediated engineering of human intestinal organoids. Nat Med 21: 256-262, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Segditsas S,
    2. Tomlinson I
    : Colorectal cancer and genetic alterations in the WNT pathway. Oncogene 25: 7531-7537, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Takahashi-Yanaga F,
    2. Kahn M
    : Targeting WNT signaling: Can we safely eradicate cancer stem cells? Clin Cancer Res 16: 3153-3162, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Takebe N,
    2. Harris PJ,
    3. Warren RQ,
    4. Ivy SP
    : Targeting cancer stem cells by inhibiting Wnt, Notch, and Hedgehog pathways. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 8: 97-106, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Yokogi S,
    2. Tsubota T,
    3. Kanki K,
    4. Azumi J,
    5. Itaba N,
    6. Oka H,
    7. Morimoto M,
    8. Ryoke K,
    9. Shiota G
    : WNT/β-Catenin signal inhibitor HC-1 sensitizes oral squamous cell carcinoma cells to 5-fluorouracil through reduction of CD44-positive population. Yonago Acta Medica 59: 93-99, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Itaba N,
    2. Matsumi Y,
    3. Okinaka K,
    4. Ashla AA,
    5. Kono Y,
    6. Osaki M,
    7. Morimoto M,
    8. Sugiyama N,
    9. Ohashi K,
    10. Okano T,
    11. Shiota G
    : Human mesenchymal stem cell-engineered hepatic cell sheets accelerate liver regeneration in mice. Sci Rep 5: 16169, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Itaba N,
    2. Sakabe T,
    3. Kanki K,
    4. Azumi J,
    5. Shimizu H,
    6. Konoa Y,
    7. Matsumi Y,
    8. Abe K,
    9. Tonoi T,
    10. Oka H,
    11. Sakurai T,
    12. Saimoto H,
    13. Morimoto M,
    14. Mabuchi Y,
    15. Matsuzaki Y,
    16. Shiota G
    : Identification of the small molecule compound which induces hepatic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells. Regenerative Ther 2: 32-41, 2015.
    OpenUrl
    1. Longley DB,
    2. Harkin DP,
    3. Johnston PG
    5-fluorouracil: mechanisms of action and clinical strategies. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 330-338, 2003.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Yoshida Y,
    2. Shimomura T,
    3. Sakabe T,
    4. Ishii K,
    5. Gonda K,
    6. Matsuoka S,
    7. Watanabe Y,
    8. Takubo K,
    9. Tsuchiya H,
    10. Hoshikawa Y,
    11. Kurimasa A,
    12. Hisatome I,
    13. Uyama T,
    14. Terai M,
    15. Umezawa A,
    16. Shiota G
    : A role of WNT/β-catenin signals in hepatic fate specification of human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 293: G1089-1098, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Calabro-Jones Paula M.,
    2. Byfield John E.,
    3. Ward John F.,
    4. Sharp Thomas R.
    : Time-dose relationships for 5-fluorouracil cytotoxicity against human epithelial cancer cells in vitro. Cancer Res 42: 4413-4420, 1982.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Tiede B,
    3. Massague J,
    4. Kang Y
    : Beyond tumorigenesis: cancer stem cells in metastasis. Cell Res 17: 3-14, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Dallas NA,
    2. Xia L,
    3. Fan F,
    4. Gray MJ,
    5. Gaur P,
    6. van Buren G 2nd.,
    7. Samuel S,
    8. Kim MP,
    9. Lim SJ,
    10. Ellis LM
    .: Chemoresistant colorectal cancer cells, the cancer stem cell phenotype, and increased sensitivity to insulin-like growth factor-I receptor inhibition. Cancer Res 69: 1951-1957, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Ring A,
    2. Kim YM,
    3. Kahn M
    : WNT/catenin signaling in adult stem cell physiology and disease. Stem Cell Rev 10: 512-525, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Huang SM,
    2. Mishina YM,
    3. Liu S,
    4. Cheung A,
    5. Stegmeier F,
    6. Michaud GA,
    7. Charlat O,
    8. Wiellette E,
    9. Zhang Y,
    10. Wiessner S,
    11. Hild M,
    12. Shi X,
    13. Wilson CJ,
    14. Mickanin C,
    15. Myer V,
    16. Fazal A,
    17. Tomlinson R,
    18. Serluca F,
    19. Shao W,
    20. Cheng H,
    21. Shultz M,
    22. Rau C,
    23. Schirle M,
    24. Schlegl J,
    25. Ghidelli S,
    26. Fawell S,
    27. Lu C,
    28. Curtis D,
    29. Kirschner MW,
    30. Lengauer C,
    31. Finan PM,
    32. Tallarico JA,
    33. Bouwmeester T,
    34. Porter JA,
    35. Bauer A,
    36. Cong F
    : Tankyrase inhibition stabilizes axin and antagonizes WNT signalling. Nature 461: 614-620, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Waaler J,
    2. Machon O,
    3. Tumova L,
    4. Dinh H,
    5. Korinek V,
    6. Wilson SR,
    7. Paulsen JE,
    8. Pedersen NM,
    9. Eide TJ,
    10. Machonova O,
    11. Gradl D,
    12. Voronkov A,
    13. von Kries JP,
    14. Krauss S
    : A novel tankyrase inhibitor decreases canonical WNT signaling in colon carcinoma cells and reduces tumor growth in conditional Apc-mutant mice. Cancer Res 72: 2822-2832, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gurney A,
    2. Axelrod F,
    3. Bond CJ,
    4. Cain J,
    5. Chartier C,
    6. Donigan L,
    7. Fischer M,
    8. Chaudhari A,
    9. Ji M,
    10. Kapoun AM,
    11. Lam A,
    12. Lazetic S,
    13. Ma S,
    14. Mitra S,
    15. Park IK,
    16. Pickell K,
    17. Sato A,
    18. Satyal S,
    19. Stroud M,
    20. Tran H,
    21. Yen WC,
    22. Lewicki J,
    23. Hoey T
    : WNT pathway inhibition via the targeting of Frizzled receptors results in decreased growth and tumorigenicity of human tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 11717-11722, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Le PN,
    2. McDermott JD,
    3. Jimeno A
    : Targeting the WNT pathway in human cancers: therapeutic targeting with a focus on OMP-54F28. Pharmacol Ther 146: 1-11, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Liu J,
    2. Pan S,
    3. Hsieh MH,
    4. Ng N,
    5. Sun F,
    6. Wang T,
    7. Kasibhatla S,
    8. Schuller AG,
    9. Li AG,
    10. Cheng D,
    11. Li J,
    12. Tompkins C,
    13. Pferdekamper A,
    14. Steffy A,
    15. Cheng J,
    16. Kowal C,
    17. Phung V,
    18. Guo G,
    19. Wang Y,
    20. Graham MP,
    21. Flynn S,
    22. Brenner JC,
    23. Li C,
    24. Villarroel MC,
    25. Schultz PG,
    26. Wu X,
    27. McNamara P,
    28. Sellers WR,
    29. Petruzzelli L,
    30. Boral AL,
    31. Seidel HM,
    32. McLaughlin ME,
    33. Che J,
    34. Carey TE,
    35. Vanasse G,
    36. Harris JL
    : Targeting WNT-driven cancer through the inhibition of Porcupine by LGK974. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110: 20224-20229, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Lenz HJ,
    2. Kahn M
    : Safely targeting cancer stem cells via selective catenin coactivator antagonism. Cancer Sci 105: 1087-1092, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 8
August 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
WNT/β-Catenin Signaling Inhibitor IC-2 Suppresses Sphere Formation and Sensitizes Colorectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
WNT/β-Catenin Signaling Inhibitor IC-2 Suppresses Sphere Formation and Sensitizes Colorectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil
SHOICHI URUSHIBARA, TOSHIAKI TSUBOTA, RYOMA ASAI, JUNYA AZUMI, KEIGO ASHIDA, YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA, GOSHI SHIOTA
Anticancer Research Aug 2017, 37 (8) 4085-4091;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
WNT/β-Catenin Signaling Inhibitor IC-2 Suppresses Sphere Formation and Sensitizes Colorectal Cancer Cells to 5-Fluorouracil
SHOICHI URUSHIBARA, TOSHIAKI TSUBOTA, RYOMA ASAI, JUNYA AZUMI, KEIGO ASHIDA, YOSHIYUKI FUJIWARA, GOSHI SHIOTA
Anticancer Research Aug 2017, 37 (8) 4085-4091;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Anti-tumor Activity of the Small Molecule Inhibitor PRI-724 Against {beta}-Catenin-activated Hepatocellular Carcinoma
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer
  • MMP-9 Genotypes Serve as Oral Cancer Predictive Marker for Smokers
  • A RANKL-derived Peptide Inhibits RSPO3-LGR4-Wnt Signaling and Lung Adenocarcinoma in Mice
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • colorectal cancer
  • WNT/β-catenin signaling inhibitor
  • cancer stem cells
  • small molecule compound
  • 5-fluorouracil
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire