Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticlePROCEEDINGS OF THE 20th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, 10 December, 2016 (Fukuoka, Japan)

Frequency of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells in the Peripheral Blood Reflects the Status of Tumor Recurrence

TOMOKO TANAKA, MITSUGU FUJITA, HIROSHI HASEGAWA, AKIRA ARIMOTO, MASAYASU NISHI, EIJI FUKUOKA, YUTAKA SUGITA, TAKERU MATSUDA, YASUO SUMI, SATOSHI SUZUKI, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI and KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA
Anticancer Research July 2017, 37 (7) 3863-3869;
TOMOKO TANAKA
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MITSUGU FUJITA
2Department of Microbiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kiyama@med.kobe-u.ac.jp mfujita47@gmail.com
HIROSHI HASEGAWA
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIRA ARIMOTO
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAYASU NISHI
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
EIJI FUKUOKA
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTAKA SUGITA
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKERU MATSUDA
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YASUO SUMI
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOSHI SUZUKI
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA
1Department of Surgery, Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kiyama@med.kobe-u.ac.jp mfujita47@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Malignant tumors inhibit antitumor immune responses, which are driven by T-regulatory cells or myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs). Since MDSCs are involved in invasion, migration, and metastasis of tumor cells, we hypothesized that MDSCs are also involved in tumor recurrence after surgical resection. Materials and Methods: C57BL/6 mice were subcutaneously inoculated with B16F10 melanoma cells in the right flank. In some experiments, established tumors were surgically resected. Peripheral blood was drawn over time, and immune cells and cytokines were evaluated using flow cytometry. Results: MDSCs and relevant pro-inflammatory cytokines increased in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice. Moreover, the frequency of MDSCs rapidly increased in mice with tumor recurrence. Conclusion: The frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice reflects the status of tumor progression as well as tumor recurrence. Continuous monitoring of MDSCs in the peripheral blood might be a useful indicator of tumor recurrence.

  • MDSC
  • tumor recurrence
  • pro-inflammatory cytokine
  • antitumor immunity

Despite recent development of antitumor modalities based on surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, it remains difficult to completely control tumor progression. This is, at least partially, attributable to tumor-induced immunosuppression; malignant tumors proactively inhibit antitumor immune responses in order to limit therapeutic efficacy and therefore maintain their survival and achieve progression (1). Immune cells responsible for this phenomenon include T-regulatory cells (Tregs) (2) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) (3, 4), both of which possess strong proangiogenic and immunosuppressive capacities. To solve this issue, therapeutic strategies targeting immune checkpoints such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), programmed death 1 (PD1), or programmed death ligand 1 (PDL1) have been introduced into this field and led to favorable outcomes (5). Nevertheless, malignant tumors eventually escape from the effects of these therapies (6). Therefore, it is of a great importance to develop further strategies to cancel tumor-induced immunosuppression.

As mentioned above, MDSCs suppress antitumor immunity and promote tumor progression (3, 4). They also stimulate angiogenesis and promote vascular remodeling. Physiologically, MDSCs are heterogeneous immature myeloid cells that are unable to differentiate into mature macrophages, dendritic cells, and granulocytes. Murine MDSCs are positive for CD11b and granulocyte differentiation antigen (Gr1) and classified into two distinct subsets: CD11bhiGr1midLy6ChiLy6Glo monocytic MDSCs (mMDSCs) and CD11bhiGr1midLy6CloLy6Ghi granulocytic MDSCs (gMDSCs). In humans with malignant tumors, gMDSCs express CD15+CD14−CD11b+CD33+HLA-DR− whereas mMDSCs express CD15−CD14+CD11b+CD33+ HLA-DR−. Morphologically, gMDSCs resemble neutrophils, whereas mMDSCs have typical monocytic features. With the presence of tumors, gMDSCs increase systemically whereas the proportion of mMDSCs stays consistent.

In order to achieve complete cure of malignant tumors, it is of the upmost importance to control tumor recurrence. To this end, there is a great demand for indicators to determine or predict tumor recurrence promptly; such indicators would allow individual tailor-made therapeutic strategies. Currently, several novel methods have been proposed (7). In addition to these, given that MDSCs are known to be involved in invasion, migration, and metastasis of tumor cells (4), we hypothesized that MDSCs are also involved in tumor recurrence after surgical resection.

Materials and Methods

Mice and cell lines. The study procedure was described previously (8). Briefly, pathogen-free female C57BL/6 mice (5-8 weeks old) were purchased from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan). All mice were maintained under pathogen-free conditions and used in accordance with the institutional guidelines of Kobe University (approval number: P170308). The B16F10 murine melanoma cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St Lois, MO, USA) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Cultured cells were tested and found to be negative for mycoplasma and viral contamination.

Subcutaneous tumor inoculation and tumor size measurement. The procedure was described previously (9). Briefly, 1×107 B16F10 cells per mouse were s.c. injected into the right flank of C57BL/6 mice. Major and minor axes of s.c. tumors were measured by caliper every 3 days, and the tumor volume was calculated by multiplication of these values.

Surgical tumor removal. The procedure described previously (9) was applied with minor modifications. Briefly, s.c. tumors were surgically resected in some experiments as follows. The tumor-bearing mice received isoflurane for anesthesia and ketoprofen (6 mg/kg body weight) for analgesia on day 12 after tumor cell inoculation. Once the mice became immobilized, the skin above the s.c. tumors were shaved and sterilized with isopropanol. The tumors were completely resected en bloc with substantial surgical margins. Wounds were closed with silk suture. The mice were transferred to a warm, dry area and monitored until recovery.

Immune cell preparation. The procedure was described previously (9). Briefly, red blood cells (RBCs) were removed from the peripheral blood using RBC lysis buffer (155 mM NH4Cl in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 7.5, 25°C). The cells were passed through cell strainers to obtain single-cell suspension. The single-cell suspension was centrifuged and resuspended in 200 μl PBS containing 1% bovine serum albmin (BSA) for 15 min at 4°C. The cells were then stained with the antibodies described below.

Antibodies and flow cytometry. The procedure was as described previously (10, 11). The following anti-mouse monoclonal antibodies were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA, USA): anti-CD11b, anti-Gr1, anti-Ly6C, anti-CD11b, anti-Ly6G, anti-CD3, anti-CD4, anti-CD25, anti-CD11c, and anti-B220. Anti-mouse CD45 and anti-mouse CD8 were purchased from BioLegend (San Diego, CA, USA). Cells were stained in a 96-round-bottom-well plate for 20-30 min at 4°C and washed with PBS containing 1% BSA. Flow cytometric data were obtained using a FACSVerse (Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA, USA) and analyzed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR, USA). All the cells were gated with CD45.

Cytometric bead array (CBA) assay. The procedure was as described previously (12). Briefly, plasma was collected from the peripheral blood of the tumor-bearing mice and aliquoted into polypropylene microcentrifuge tubes and stored at −80°C until use. Concentrations of different cytokines were quantitatively measured using beads that were coated with antibodies against the following mouse cytokines: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 6 (IL6), Interferon γ (IFNγ), and interleukin 17A (IL17A). Stained samples were run on a FACSVerse (Becton Dickinson) instrument. All the samples were assayed in duplicate and quantitated using a standardized curve. The data were analyzed using FACSArray (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis. The procedure has been described previously (9, 11). Briefly, one-way analysis of variance with Holm's post-hoc test was performed to analyze differences among multiple groups using JMP software (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA). A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MDSCs substantially increased in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice. To address the impact of tumor presence on the systemic cellular immunity, we extensively evaluated immune cells subsets in the peripheral blood by flow cytometry (Figure 1). Tumor-bearing mice exhibited a significant increase in the frequency of CD11b+Gr1+ MDSCs in their peripheral blood with tumor progression over time (p<0.001 for day 0 vs. day 19; Figure 1A). In contrast to the MDSCs, other immune cell subsets such as CD8+ T-cells, CD4+ T-cells, Tregs, B-cells, and dendritic cells exhibited no association with the tumor progression over time (Figure 1B-D). These data suggest that the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood preferentially reflects the status of tumor progression in vivo compared with other immune cell subsets.

Granulocytic MDSCs preferentially increased in tumor-bearing mice. MDSCs are known to have at least two distinct subsets: gMDSCs and mMDSCs (4). We, therefore, sought to evaluate the MDSC subsets in detail (Figure 2). On day 12 after tumor cell inoculation, the frequency of gMDSCs in total MDSCs exhibited a rapid increase compared with that of mMDSCs (p<0.001). Thereafter, the frequency of gMDSCs gradually increased whereas mMDSCs remained almost at the initial level (p<0.001 for day 0 vs. day 19). These data suggest that the changes in the CD11b+Gr1+MDSCs frequency primarily reflect the changes in gMDSCs.

MDSC-relevant pro-inflammatory cytokines increased in tumor-bearing mice. The findings that MDSCs would reflect the status of tumor progression in vivo led us to evaluate plasma levels of pro-inflammatory and inflammatory cytokines that are responsible for MDSC kinetics (3). To this end, we performed CBA-based cytokine monitoring. The plasma levels of GCSF, MCP1, and IL6 increased over time along with the tumor progression (p=0.0234 for G-CSF, p=0.0618 for MCP1, and p=0.0120 for IL6; Figure 3, upper panels). In contrast, IFNγ, TNFα, and IL17A exhibited no remarkable changes (p=0.4185 for IFNγ, p=0.8253 for TNFα, and p=0.3818 for IL17A; Figure 3, lower panels). These data suggest that MDSC-relevant cytokines such as GCSF, MCP1, and IL6 are preferentially induced in tumor-bearing mice.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) substantially increased in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing mice. Female C57BL/6 mice (n=5) were subcutaneously (s.c.) inoculated with 1×107 B16F10 melanoma cells in the right flank. The following immune cell subsets in the peripheral blood were measured on the days indicated by flow cytometry: CD11b × granulocyte differentiation antigen (Gr1) (A), CD3 × CD8 (B), CD4 × CD25 (C), and CD11c × B220 (D). Left panels, Representative flow cytometric data; right panels, enumeration of the flow cytometric data. Each experiment was repeated 3 times; values are expressed as mean with 75 and 25 percentiles. p-Values were based on one-way analysis of variance with Holm's post-hoc test. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. DPI, Days post-tumor cell inoculation.

Frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood reflected the status of tumor recurrence. The above findings (shown in Figures 1, 2 and 3) clearly indicate that the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood and the plasma levels of MDSC-relevant cytokines reflect the status of tumor progression. Based on these findings, we sought to address whether these factors would also reflect the status of tumor recurrence. To this end, we resected s.c. tumors on day 12 and monitored the mice for local tumor recurrence. The mice were then subgrouped into those with and those without local recurrence (Figure 4A). The frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood steadily increased until tumor resection on day 12. After resection, the frequency of MDSCs decreased. Nevertheless, mice with tumor recurrence exhibited an increase in the frequency of MDSCs, and they exhibited tumor recurrence when the frequency reached approximately 30% of total PBMCs. We reorganized the MDSC data based on the following phases: pre-recurrence, ortho-recurrence (at the time of recurrence), and post-recurrence (p=0.0163 for pre vs. ortho, and p=0.0121 for ortho vs. post; Figure 4B). We recorded significant differences in the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood among groups. Consistent with the MDSC data, the plasma levels of GCSF, MCP1, and IL6 significantly increased after local recurrence (p=0.0320 for GCSF, p=0.0059 for MCP1, and p=0.0002 for IL6; Figure 4C). However, there was no change observed in the level of INFγ, TNFα, and IL17A among the phases (data not shown). Taken together, these data suggest that the frequency of MDSCs and certain MDSC-relevant cytokines in the peripheral blood reflect the status of tumor recurrence. The tumor recurrence rate in these experiments was approximately 66% (n=24/36). We observed no significant differences in the volume of primary tumors prior to the resection among the groups (data not shown).

Discussion

The purpose of this study was to address whether the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood reflects the pathological condition of tumor progression (particularly tumor recurrence) over time. We observed that the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood was associated with macroscopic recurrence of s.c. tumors (Figure 4). Requisite to detecting tumor recurrence is that data correlate with the timing of tumor recurrence, that data are traceable over time, and that methods are feasible. From this viewpoint, the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood is a useful indicator of tumor recurrence.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Granulocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) preferentially increase in tumor-bearing hosts. MDSC subsets were further evaluated on the days indicated. gMDSC: CD11bhiGr1midLy6CloLy6Ghi granulocytic MDSCs. mMDSC: CD11bhighGr1midLy6ChiLy6Glo monocytic MDSCs. p-Values were based on one-way analysis of variance with Holm's post-hoc test. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. DPI, Days post-tumor cell inoculation.

We previously reported that MDSCs accumulate in the lungs and spleen with the tumor progression in tumor-bearing mice (9). Regarding the subsets of MDSCs, gMDSCs accumulated predominantly in these organs, whereas mMDSCs accumulated in the tumor microenvironment. Consistent with these observation, gMDSCs were found to increase systemically with tumor progression (Figures 1 and 2) as well as tumor recurrence (Figure 4A and B). These data suggest that the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood is a useful indicator of tumor recurrence. It is clinically important to establish biomarkers to predict tumor recurrence because it allows individual tailor-made therapeutic strategies. Various biomarkers of tumor recurrence have been proposed thus far (7); most of them require expensive, time-consuming, special facility-requiring, cumbersome analyses. Compared to those previously proposed, it seems practically feasible to monitor the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood.

In contrast, other cell populations exhibited no remarkable changes with the tumor progression (Figure 1B-D). Of note, Tregs have been shown to increase in the peripheral blood of tumor-bearing animals (2), which was not observed in this study. The kinetics of Tregs in the peripheral blood remains to be elucidated as an indicator of tumor recurrence.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC)-relevant pro-inflammatory cytokines increase in tumor-bearing hosts. Plasma was collected from the peripheral blood of the tumor-bearing mice (n=3). The following cytokines in the plasma were measured by cytokine bead array (CBA) and flow cytometry: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), interleukin 6 (IL6), Interferon γ (IFNγ), and interleukin 17A (IL17A). Each experiment was repeated 3 times; values are expressed as mean with 75 and 25 percentiles. p-Values were based on one-way analysis of variance with Holm's post-hoc test. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. DPI, Days post-tumor cell inoculation.

Pro-inflammatory cytokines are essential factors for the establishment of an immunosuppressive tumor micro-environment (13). Among them, GCSF is known to be produced by tumor-initiating cells and play important roles in the early stage of tumor progression (14). Consistent with these findings, the plasma levels of GCSF, MCP1 and IL6 (Figure 3A-C) clearly increased with tumor progression (Figure 3), as well as with tumor recurrence (Figure 4C) in this study. The problem in measuring these cytokines in order to predict tumor recurrence is that the cytokine changes are not as sensitive as MDSCs (Figure 4B) for this purpose. These results directed us to investigate the cell populations that produce GCSF, MCP1 and IL6, including MDSCs and Tregs.

We successfully established an animal model of tumor recurrence (Figure 4) using 1×107 B16F10 melanoma cells. In this regard, we previously observed no tumor recurrence when 1×105 cells were s.c. inoculated; when 5×106 cells were inoculated, about 20% of mice exhibited tumor recurrence (9). Given that we observed no metastasis to the lung throughout these experiments in this study, these observations collectively suggest that the size of primary tumors prior to resection is associated with local tumor recurrence. The animal model used in this study theoretically allows comprehensive analyses to identify predictive factors for tumor recurrence and to determine therapeutic effects. We are currently improving the analysis system to this end.

In summary, we demonstrated that the frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood of hosts after tumor resection is an appropriate indicator of tumor recurrence. Clinically, early detection of tumor recurrence allows individual tailor-made therapeutic strategies and might lead to complete cure from malignant tumor. From this viewpoint, our data suggest that continuous monitoring of MDSCs seems to be a feasible strategy for detecting tumor recurrence at the early phase. Further studies will be necessary to determine whether the continuous monitoring of MDSCs in humans would be useful in detecting tumor recurrence after curative resection.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

Frequency of myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) in the peripheral blood reflects the status of tumor recurrence. A: The s.c. tumors were surgically removed on day 12 after tumor cell inoculation. The mice were periodically monitored for local recurrence and subgrouped based on tumor recurrence; the frequency of MDSCs in peripheral blood was measured by flow cytometry and plotted. B: The frequency of MDSCs in the peripheral blood of the mice with tumor recurrence was plotted based on the following phases: pre-recurrence, ortho-recurrence, and post-recurrence. C: Plasma levels of interleukin 6 (IL6), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF), and monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1) were simultaneously measured. p-Values were based on one-way ANOVA with Holm's post-hoc test. A value of p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. DPI, Days post-tumor cell inoculation.

Acknowledgements

All the Authors have no conflict of interest in regard to this study. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan (KY: No. 16K10541; YK: No. 16H05415).

  • Received March 5, 2017.
  • Revision received April 5, 2017.
  • Accepted May 5, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rabinovich GA,
    2. Gabrilovich D,
    3. Sotomayor EM
    : Immunosuppressive strategies that are mediated by tumor cells. Annu Rev Immunol 25: 267-296, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Tanaka A,
    2. Sakaguchi S
    : Regulatory T-cells in cancer immunotherapy. Cell Res 27: 109-118, 2017.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Gabrilovich DI,
    2. Nagaraj S
    : Myeloid-derived suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol 9: 162-174, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kumar V,
    2. Patel S,
    3. Tcyganov E,
    4. Gabrilovich DI
    : The nature of myeloid-derived suppressor cells in the tumor microenvironment. Trends Immunol 37: 208-220, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Sharma P,
    2. Allison JP
    : The future of immune checkpoint therapy. Science 348: 56-61, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Restifo NP,
    2. Smyth MJ,
    3. Snyder A
    : Acquired resistance to immunotherapy and future challenges. Nat Rev Cancer 16: 121-126, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Chi KR
    : The tumour trail left in blood. Nature 532: 269-271, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Yamashita K,
    2. Hasegawa H,
    3. Fujita M,
    4. Nishi M,
    5. Tanaka T,
    6. Arimoto A,
    7. Suzuki S,
    8. Kamigaki T,
    9. Kakeji Y
    : Host CD40 is essential for DCG treatment against metastatic lung cancer. Anticancer Res 36: 3659-3665, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Otsubo D,
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. Fujita M,
    4. Nishi M,
    5. Kimura Y,
    6. Hasegawa H,
    7. Suzuki S,
    8. Kakeji Y
    : Early-phase treatment by low-dose 5-fluorouracil or primary tumor resection inhibits MDSC-mediated lung metastasis formation. Anticancer Res 35: 4425-4431, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Hasegawa H,
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. Otubo D,
    4. Fujii S,
    5. Kamigaki T,
    6. Kuroda D,
    7. Kakeji Y
    : Allogeneic DCG promote lung NK cell activation and antitumor effect after invariant NKT cell activation. Anticancer Res 34: 3411-3417, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Tasaki T,
    2. Fujita M,
    3. Okuda T,
    4. Yoneshige A,
    5. Nakata S,
    6. Yamashita K,
    7. Yoshioka H,
    8. Izumoto S,
    9. Kato A
    : MET expressed in glioma stem cells is a potent therapeutic target for glioblastoma multiforme. Anticancer Res 36: 3571-3577, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Hasegawa H,
    2. Yamashita K,
    3. Otsubo D,
    4. Kakeji Y
    : Liver injury after invariant NKT cell activation by free alpha-galactosylceramide and alpha-galactosylceramide-loaded dendritic cells. Anticancer Res 36: 3667-3672, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Dranoff G
    : Cytokines in cancer pathogenesis and cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer 4: 11-22, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Welte T,
    2. Kim IS,
    3. Tian L,
    4. Gao X,
    5. Wang H,
    6. Li J,
    7. Holdman XB,
    8. Herschkowitz JI,
    9. Pond A,
    10. Xie G,
    11. Kurley S,
    12. Nguyen T,
    13. Liao L,
    14. Dobrolecki LE,
    15. Pang L,
    16. Mo Q,
    17. Edwards DP,
    18. Huang S,
    19. Xin L,
    20. Xu J,
    21. Li Y,
    22. Lewis MT,
    23. Wang T,
    24. Westbrook TF,
    25. Rosen JM,
    26. Zhang XH
    : Oncogenic mTOR signalling recruits myeloid-derived suppressor cells to promote tumour initiation. Nat Cell Biol 18: 632-644, 2016.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 37 (7)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 7
July 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Frequency of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells in the Peripheral Blood Reflects the Status of Tumor Recurrence
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Frequency of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells in the Peripheral Blood Reflects the Status of Tumor Recurrence
TOMOKO TANAKA, MITSUGU FUJITA, HIROSHI HASEGAWA, AKIRA ARIMOTO, MASAYASU NISHI, EIJI FUKUOKA, YUTAKA SUGITA, TAKERU MATSUDA, YASUO SUMI, SATOSHI SUZUKI, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA
Anticancer Research Jul 2017, 37 (7) 3863-3869;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Frequency of Myeloid-derived Suppressor Cells in the Peripheral Blood Reflects the Status of Tumor Recurrence
TOMOKO TANAKA, MITSUGU FUJITA, HIROSHI HASEGAWA, AKIRA ARIMOTO, MASAYASU NISHI, EIJI FUKUOKA, YUTAKA SUGITA, TAKERU MATSUDA, YASUO SUMI, SATOSHI SUZUKI, YOSHIHIRO KAKEJI, KIMIHIRO YAMASHITA
Anticancer Research Jul 2017, 37 (7) 3863-3869;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Immunosuppression Induced by Perioperative Peritonitis Promotes Lung Metastasis
  • Application of iNKT Cell-targeted Active Immunotherapy in Cancer Treatment
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Design and Synthesis of Novel Anti-metastatic Hypoxic Cytotoxin TX-2137 Targeting AKT Kinase
  • Apremilast Induces Apoptosis of Human Colorectal Cancer Cells with Mutant KRAS
  • HB-EGF Is a Promising Therapeutic Target for Lung Cancer with Secondary Mutation of EGFRT790M
Show more PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20th ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, 10 December, 2016 (Fukuoka, Japan)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • MDSC
  • tumor recurrence
  • pro-inflammatory cytokine
  • antitumor immunity
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire