Abstract
Background: To date, two cyclo-oxygenase (COX) isoforms, COX1 and COX2, have been identified. In the present study, the COX-inhibitory activities of TX-1123 derivatives with the 2-hydroxyarylidene-4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione structure were examined, and the binding profiles of TX-1123 to COXs were analyzed using docking simulations. Materials and Methods: X-Ray data on COX1 [protein data bank (PDB) ID=1PGG] and COX2 (PDB ID=3LN1) were used for molecular interactive simulations. The interactive profiles of TX-1123 derivatives with COXs were examined using a molecular simulation technique with Molegro Virtual Docker (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark). Results: TX-1123 exhibited COX1-inhibitory activity [half-maximal-inhibitory concentration (IC50)=1.57×10−5 M]. The COX2 inhibitory activity of TX-1123 was potent (IC50=1.16×10−6 M), and the ratio of COX1/COX2 inhibition was 13.5. TX-1123 bound to the COX2 molecule, and the oxygen atom of the 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione region of TX-1123 interacted with Cys26 and Gln447 of COX2. Conclusion: The TX-1123-binding pocket of COX2 differs from that of the COX2-selective celecoxib-binding pocket. TX-1123 exhibited a different COX2-interactive mechanism from that of celecoxib.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used in clinical practice. The anti-inflammatory effect of NSAIDs are attributable to reductions in the formation of prostaglandins (PG) (1, 2). This ability is associated with the inhibition of cyclo-oxygenase (COX), which converts arachidonic acid to PGH2. To date, two COX isoforms, COX1 and COX2, have been identified. COX1 is expressed constitutively and is the housekeeping enzyme responsible for the physiological activities of PG. COX2 is expressed under inflammatory conditions, and is responsible for pathological PGs that produce pain and fever (3-5). The COX2-selective agent celecoxib is widely used as anti-inflammatory agent (6).
We previously designed and synthesized a new tyrphostin AG17 analog. Tyrphostin AG17 was shown to suppress the effects of insulin in rat adipocytes (7). Palumbo et al. demonstrated that AG17 induced apoptosis and inhibited cyclin-dependent kinase 2 activity through a mechanism that purportedly did not involve reductions in cellular ATP level (8). Tyrphostin AG17 has been shown to act as an uncoupler of oxidative phosphorylation in isolated rat liver and heart mitochondria (9). Designed tyrphostin AG17 analogs have a 2-hydroxyarylidene-4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione structure (Figure 1). TX-1123 has been shown to possess useful features (e.g. strong Src kinase inhibitory activity and weak mitochondrial toxicity) (10-11). In the present study, we analyzed the COX-inhibitory activities of TX-1123 derivatives, and examined the binding profiles of TX-1123 to COXs using docking simulations.
Materials and Methods
Assay for COX inhibition. COX1 and COX2 proteins were isolated from ram seminal vesicles and sheep placenta, and the inhibitory effect of test compounds on these COX proteins were examined as previously described (12). COX1- and COX2-inhibitory effect of celecoxib were examined by COX1-mediated PGE2 production in human lymphoma cells (half maximal-inhibitory concentration, IC50) and COX2-mediated PGE2 production in human dermal fibroblasts (IC50), respectively (13).
Interactive analysis of TX-1123 with COX. The X-ray data sets of COX1 (protein data bank ID=1PGG) and COX2 (ID=3LN1) were used for molecular interactive simulation. The interactive analysis between TX-1123 derivatives and COXs were examined by molecular simulation technique [Molecular Mechanics (MM) - Molecular Dynamics (MD)] using InsightII Discover under consistent valence force field (Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and Molegro Virtual Docker (CLC bio, Aarhus, Denmark) as previously described (11, 14-15). The ligand-bindable pocket of COXs were examined using Molegro Virtual Docker.
Results
Effects of TX-1123 derivatives on COX activity. TX-1123 exhibited COX1-inhibitory activity, and its half maximal-inhibitory concentration (IC50) was 1.57×10−5 M (Table I). The COX2-inhibitory activity of TX-1123 was potent (IC50=1.16×10−6 M), and the ratio of COX1/COX2 inhibition (RC1/C2) was 13.5. RC1/C2 is an index of COX2 selectivity. The COX2-inhibitory effect of TX-1123 was higher than that of the COX1-inhibitory effect. TX-1925 exhibited inhibitory activity toward COX1 (IC50=4.77×10−5 M) and COX2 (IC50=1.03×10−5 M), and the RC1/C2 was 4.63. The RC1/C2 values of TX-1918, TX-1926, and TX-1934 were less than 1.0 (0.11-0.77), and these TX compounds were not selective for COX2. Tyrphostin AG17 only weakly inhibited COX1 and COX2, with IC50 values of 10-fold or greater than those of the TX derivatives.
The COX-inhibitory activity of celecoxib, which is a known COX2-selective drug, was demonstrated using the production of PGE2 in human lymphoma cells, and its IC50 values [2.80×10−6 M (COX1) and 9.10×10−8 M (COX2)] were summarized from previous report (13).
Ligand-bindable pockets in COX2. The COX2 molecule flexibly moved during the MM-MD simulation (data not shown). Three major ligand-bindable pockets were observed in the COX2 molecule (Figure 2). Similar ligand-bindable pockets to those in the COX2 molecule were also detected in the COX1 molecule (data not shown).
Interaction between TX-1123 and COXs. TX-1123 bound at COX2 pocket B (Figure 2), and the oxygen atom of the 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione region of TX-1123 interacted with Cys26 (nitrogen atom) and Gln447 (the nitrogen atom of the amide group) (Figure 3A and B). COX2-selective celecoxib bound at pocket C (Figure 2), and the oxygen atom of the sulfonamide group interacted with both Ile503 (nitrogen atom) and Phe504 (nitrogen atom) (Figure 3C and D). The nitrogen atom of the sulfonamide group of celecoxib interacted with Phe504 (the oxygen atom of the hydroxy group).
TX-1123 bound COX1 pocket B, and the oxygen atom of the 4-cyclopentene-1,3-dione group of TX-1123 interacted with Cys41 (nitrogen atom) and Gln461 (the nitrogen atom of the amide group) (Figure 4A and B). The oxygen atom of the TX-1123 phenolic group interacted with COX1 Arg469 (the nitrogen atom of the side chain). Indomethacin bound to COX1 pocket C (Figure 4C), and the carboxyl group oxygen atom of indomethacin interacted with COX1 Tyr355 (phenolic hydroxyl group) (Figure 4D). Indomethacin also bound to COX2 pocket A, and interacted with COX2 His372 and Thr198 (data not shown).
Electrostatic potential (ESP) interaction between TX-1123 and COX2. The interactive feature of ESP fields between TX-1123 and COX2 is shown in Figure 5. An ESP field was not detected at the position of TX-1123, whereas positive and negative ESP fields were distributed around the TX-1123-binding pocket (Figure 5). This distribution pattern of ESP fields was similar to that of the celecoxib-bound COX2 molecule (data not shown).
Discussion
The development of COX2-selective inhibitors was examined, and the molecular design and synthesis of TX-1123 derivatives was performed (10). TX-1123 exhibited potent COX2-inhibitory activity, with an RC1/C2 value of 13.5, which was close to that of celecoxib (30.8) (Table I). The RC1/C2 value decreased to 4.63 for TX-1925, which possesses a methoxy group instead of the hydroxy group in TX-1123 (Figure 1). The RC1/C2 value of TX-1918, which had two substituted methyl groups at the tert-butyl groups, decreased significantly to 0.11. The surrounding structure of the phenolic hydroxy group appears to be important for COX2 selectivity. The RC1/C2 value was 0.77 for TX-1926, which was introduced at a benzene ring into the cyclopentene-1,3-dione region, and a conjugate system located far from the phenolic hydroxy group in TX-1123 may contribute to COX2 selectivity. It was not possible to confirm the COX2 selectivity of the designed TX-1123 series, except for TX-1123, which appears to be a useful lead structure for the design of more efficient compounds.
Three ligand-bindable pockets were detected in the COX2 molecule, and binding of TX-1123 to pocket B was suggested by the binding simulation (Figure 2). Celecoxib bound to pocket C of COX2, which differed from the TX-1123-binding pocket (Figure 3). The binding mechanism of TX-1123 to COX2 is expected to differ from that of celecoxib. The IC50 value of TX-1123 was higher than that of celecoxib, while the binding affinity of TX-1123 appeared to be weaker than that of celecoxib. TX-1123 was also bindable to COX1 (pocket B), which differed from the indomethacin-binding pocket (pocket C) (Figure 4). The COX1-inhibitory activity of TX-1123 was one order weaker than that for COX2. The COX1-inhibitory activity of indomethacin was two orders stronger than its COX2-inhibitory activity, and the COX1-inhibitory mechanism of indomethacin appears to differ from that of TX-1123.
An ESP field did not exist at the TX-1123-bound COX2 pocket, and positive- and negative-ESP fields surrounded the TX-1123-binding pocket (Figure 5). Thus, strong electrostatic energy does not appear to be necessary for the binding reaction between TX-1123 and COX2. A rigid interactive relationship, such as the lock-and-key model of enzyme and substrate, does not appear to be important for the COX2-selectivity of TX-1123 family members. Protein–ligand interactions have been examined using isothermal titration calorimetry, and molecular parameters (e.g. enthalpy, entropy) have been determined (16). Enthalpy and entropy are used as components of binding free energy, and these parameters are applied to drug design. An optimized drug which is highly efficient and has few side-effects exhibits more enthalpy-dominated features (17). A dominant analysis of enthalpy with TX-1123 derivatives is currently in progress in order to obtain a better understanding of the interaction mechanisms between TX-1123 family members and the COX2 molecule.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (15K08113) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of the Japanese Government. Authors thank Prof. Toshio SATOH (Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Tokushima Bunri University) for examination of COX activity.
- Received May 9, 2017.
- Revision received May 29, 2017.
- Accepted May 30, 2017.
- Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved