Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Feasibility and Safety of Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Miriplatin–Lipiodol Suspension for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TOMOHIRO MATSUMOTO, HITOSHI ICHIKAWA, JIN IMAI, TOSHIHIKO HAYASHI, KOSUKE TOMITA, TAKAHIKO MINE, SEIICHIRO KOJIMA, NORIHITO WATANABE and TERUMITSU HASEBE
Anticancer Research June 2017, 37 (6) 3183-3187;
TOMOHIRO MATSUMOTO
1Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HITOSHI ICHIKAWA
2Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JIN IMAI
2Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOSHIHIKO HAYASHI
1Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOSUKE TOMITA
1Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAHIKO MINE
1Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SEIICHIRO KOJIMA
2Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIHITO WATANABE
2Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TERUMITSU HASEBE
1Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, Hachioji, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: hasebe{at}tokai-u.jp
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) three or more times using miriplatin-lipiodol (M-LPD) suspension (repeated M-LPD TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Patients and Methods: Sixteen patients who underwent repeated M-LPD TACE were examined. Total dose of miriplatin, lipiodol and porous gelatin sponge particles and adverse events of the first and last M-LPD TACE were evaluated. Results: The mean±standard deviation (SD) of the total number of M-LPD TACE per patient was 3.7±1.1. The mean±SD dose of total miriplatin, lipiodol and porous gelatin sponge particles per patient was 303±103 mg, 21±7.3 ml and 84±57 mg, respectively. There were no significant differences in any adverse events between the first and last M-LPD TACE. Conclusion: Repeated M-LPD TACE for HCC is feasible and safe in selected patients.

  • Transarterial chemoembolization
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • miriplatin

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant diseases worldwide (1). Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is the most frequently used treatment for managing unresectable HCC, with proven improvement in survival of selected patients (2, 3). The first platinum-based anticancer agent, cisplatin, has remarkable antitumor effects in TACE (4-7). However, cisplatin is rather hydrophilic and barely soluble in lipiodol (Andre Guerbet, Aulnay-sous-Bois, France), which is a carrier of anticancer agents for targeted chemotherapy for HCC, even when prepared as a powder to increase its solubility in lipiodol. Therefore, only a small volume of cisplatin remains in the tumor for a long period, and most of the agent is released briefly into the bloodstream in the systemic circulation and cause systemic side-effects such as nausea/vomiting and renal dysfunction (8). Furthermore, it has also been reported that hypersensitivity reactions as an adverse effect occurred in 8.9% of patients who underwent three or more TACE sessions using cisplatin–lipiodol suspension (C-LPD) (9). Recently, a new platinum-based anticancer agent, miriplatin (Dainippon Sumitomo Pharma Co., Ltd, Osaka, Japan), that is easily suspended in lipiodol, was developed for intra-arterial treatment of HCC in Japan (10). When lipiodol is injected into an artery supplying HCC nodules, it selectively accumulates in the tumor. A miriplatin–lipiodol suspension (M-LPD) deposited within HCC nodules will gradually release active platinum compounds into tumor tissues, thereby exerting prolonged antitumor effects; however, it is minimally transferred into the systemic circulation. Based on these pharmacokinetic characteristics, conventional TACE using M-LPD, performed using M-LPD followed by porous gelatin sponge particles, and transarterial infusion chemotherapy using M-LPD have recently been reported to be highly effective and safe (8, 11-13). Additionally, M-LPD has been safely used as an anticancer drug in balloon-occluded TACE (14), which has the potential to improve cancer nodule control locally, compared with conventional TACE (15, 16). However, the feasibility and safety of repeated M-LPD TACE three or more times including conventional and balloon-occluded TACE (repeated M-LPD TACE) has not yet been evaluated because previous reports on M-LPD TACE dealt with single session only.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility and safety of repeated M-LPD TACE for HCC.

Patients and Methods

Study design. This retrospective study was conducted with the approval of the Institutional Review Board (16R-263). Informed consent was obtained for every diagnostic and interventional procedure.

Patients. Between January 2013 and December 2016, 61 patients received repeated M-LPD TACE for the treatment of HCC at our Institution. The inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: (a) the first M-LPD TACE for HCC was initial TACE and (b) only miriplatin was used as the anticancer drug in TACE (Figure 1). Finally, 16 out of the 61 patients (26%) were included in the study. There were 10 males and six females, with a mean age±standard deviation (SD) of 73±7 years (range=58-83 years) (Table I).

The diagnosis of HCC was made based on distinctive computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, in addition to high serum levels of tumor markers [α-fetoprotein (AFP) or protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist-II (PIVKA-II)] (Table I).

TACE. All TACE procedures were performed by three interventional radiologists (T. H., T. M. and T.M.) with more than 10 years' experience in hepatic vascular interventions, using the same angiographic flat-panel detector system (Siemens Medical Solutions, Forchheim, Germany). An appropriate microcatheter or microballoon catheter was coaxially inserted through a 4-Fr catheter via the femoral artery and placed into the tumor feeder vessel. After tumor location was confirmed, infusion of M-LPD, which was prepared by dissolving 70 mg of miriplatin in 4 or 5 ml of lipiodol warmed to 40°C, was initiated, followed by embolization of each hepatic area containing the target tumors with porous gelatin particles (Gelpart; Nippon Kayaku, Tokyo, Japan) 1 or 2 mm in diameter. When TACE using a microballoon catheter was performed, M-LPD infusion was continued under microballoon occlusion. Details of microballoon catheter characteristics are summarized elsewhere (14, 17). The end-point of M-LPD infusion in conventional and balloon-occluded TACE was as follows: the HCC nodule filled with M-LPD or the portal venous branches were beginning to be filled with M-LPD. The dose of miriplatin and lipiodol per session was limited to 140 mg and 10 ml for all patients, respectively.

Parameters investigated. We investigated total dose of M-LPD and porous gelatin sponge particles, and adverse events of the first and last M-LPD TACE, which were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE v4.0) (18).

Statistical analysis. For statistical analysis, commercial software (JMP 12; SAS Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used. Statistical analyses were performed using the Wilcoxon test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test for nonparametric data as appropriate. Differences were considered significant when the p-value was 0.05 or in the analyses.

Results

The total number of M-LPD TACE was 59 sessions. The total number of repeated M-LPD TACE was 27 sessions. The mean±SD number of M-LPD TACE per patient was 3.7±1.1 (range=3-7) sessions. M-LPD TACE was performed at intervals of 231±189 (42-836) days.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Flowchart for the patients of this study. M-LPD: Miriplatin-lipiodol suspension, TACE: Transarterial chemoembolization, DEB-TACE: TACE with drug-eluting beads.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics of this study (n=16).

The mean±SD dose of miriplatin, lipiodol and porous gelatin sponge particles per patient was 303±103 (range=182-492.8) mg, 21±7.3 (range=13-35) ml and 84±57 (range=28-246.4) mg, respectively. The mean±SD dose of miriplatin, lipiodol and porous gelatin sponge particles per session was 83±36 (range=21-140) mg, 5.9±2.6 (range=1.5-10) ml and 22±21 (range=4-44) mg, respectively.

There were no significant differences in Child-Pugh score before the procedure and dose of miriplatin, lipiodol and porous gelatin sponge particles between the first and last M-LPD TACE groups (Table II).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Characteristics of the first and last miriplatin-lipiodol suspension transarterial chemoembolization (M-LPD TACE) (n=16). Data are the mean±SD (range).

Fever, anorexia and elevation of serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels were observed in most patients after the procedure in both the first and last M-LPD TACE groups. Grade 4 AST elevations were seen in one patient (6%) in both the first and last M-LPD TACE groups. Grades 1 and 2 serum creatinine elevation in the first M-LPD TACE group were observed in one (6%) and two patients (13%), respectively. Grades 1 and 2 serum creatinine elevation in the last M-LPD TACE group were observed in two (13%) and one patient (6%), respectively. The three patients in whom serum creatinine elevation was observed after the first and last M-LPD TACE were the same (Table III). The patients' creatinine levels before the first and last M-LPD TACE was the upper limit of normal or slightly high (Table III). Elevation of the serum creatinine level up to 2.32 mg/dl was observed after the last M-LPD TACE in one patient (Table III). However, recovery from the adverse effect took place within one week. No other serious complications such as liver abscess, hypersensitivity reaction to miriplatin or treatment-related deaths were observed in any M-LPD TACE session.

There were no significant differences between the first and last M-LPD TACE groups in terms of any adverse events (Table IV).

Discussion

According to Fujiyama et al., the pharmacokinetic parameters of miniplatin, namely Cmax (maximum drug concentration), Tmax (time to maximum drug concentration) and t1/2 (half-life) are 5.3-14.2 mg/ml, 7-183 days and 18.4-707.2 days, respectively (19), in comparison with those of cisplatin for which Cmax is 2-3 μg/ml and t1/2 is 5-7 days (4), are considerably lower; Cmax and Tmax of miriplatin are each approximately 1/100-1/500 than that of cisplatin, but the half-life is much longer. This reflects the sustained release properties of M-LPD. On the other hand, there is a potential risk for an increase in some adverse events such as hematological toxicity, nausea/vomiting, hypersensitivity reactions and renal dysfunction by repeated M-LPD TACE, paralleling increasing residual miriplatin in the body by performing repeated M-LPD TACE. However, there have been no reports on relevant clinical investigations.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

The course of creatinine (Cr) level in patients with Cr increase.

In our study, the toxicity profile for repeated M-LPD TACE was mild and acceptable. There were no significant differences in the Child-Pugh score before the procedure and dose of miriplatin, lipiodol and porous gelatin sponge particles between the first and last M-LPD TACE groups. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in any adverse events between the first and last M-LPD TACE groups. These results suggest that residual miriplatin after performing repeated M-LPD TACE had little or no impact on the patients of our study.

Anorexia and fever frequently emerged as adverse effects in both the first and last M-LPD TACE groups. However, these are reactions that usually accompany hepatic intra-arterial infusion as a therapeutic modality. Elevations of serum AST and ALT were observed quite frequently in both the first and last M-LPD TACE groups.

Transient elevations of serum transaminase levels are commonly observed following conventional TACE using M-LPD (8, 11-13), balloon-occluded TACE using M-LPD (14) and TACE using other anticancer agents (7, 20-22).

Renal dysfunction is a typical problem with C-LPD TACE. However, repeated M-LPD TACE were possible even in cases of slight renal function decline in our study.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Adverse effects after first and last transarterial chemoembolization with miriplatin-lipiodol suspension (M-LPD TACE) (n=16).

No hypersensitivity reactions as an adverse effect occurred in any M-LPD TACE session. Although the mechanism of cisplatin-induced hypersensitivity remains unknown, hypersensitivity reactions to platinum compounds seem to be generally mediated by type I hypersensitivity, and platinum compounds dependently induce the direct release of histamine as another mechanism of the hypersensitivity (23). In particular, patients who received three or more sessions of C-LPD conventional TACE had a 13-fold increase in the risk of hypersensitivity reactions (9). Indeed, differences between M-LPD and C-LPD TACE in respect of hypersensitivity reactions as adverse effects are unclear. However, repeated M-LPD TACE may be desirable from the viewpoint of minimizing hypersensitivity reactions.

There are some limitations to the present study, the first being its retrospective design. Secondly, this study was limited by its small sample size. Lastly, we did not evaluate the changes in platinum concentration in the plasma. However, to the best of our knowledge, the present study is the first work that shows the feasibility and safety of repeated M-LPD TACE. Therefore, further investigations into the safety and therapeutic efficacy of repeated M-LPD TACE are clearly necessary.

In conclusion, repeated M-LPD TACE for HCC is feasible and safe in selected patients.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Shinji Takashimizu, Dr. Junko Nagata and Dr. Hiroyuki Ito of the Department of Gastroenterology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, for their help in patient management; and Dr. Kazunobu Hashida and Dr. Satoshi Suda of the Department of Radiology, Tokai University Hachioji Hospital, Tokai University School of Medicine, for continuing support and encouragement.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    On behalf of all Authors, the corresponding Author states that there is no conflict of interest in regard to this study.

  • Ethical Approval

    All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. None of the Authors was involved in any studies with animals in relation to the preparation of this article.

  • Informed Consent

    Informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.

  • Received March 27, 2017.
  • Revision received April 13, 2017.
  • Accepted April 19, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Parkin DM,
    2. Bray F,
    3. Ferlay J,
    4. Pisani P
    : Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55: 74-108, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Llovet JM,
    2. Real MI,
    3. Montana X,
    4. Planas R,
    5. Coll S,
    6. Aponte J,
    7. Ayuso C,
    8. Sala M,
    9. Muchart J,
    10. Sola R,
    11. Rodes J,
    12. Bruix J
    : Arterial embolisation or chemoembolisation versus symptomatic treatment in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 359: 1734-1739, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lo CM,
    2. Ngan H,
    3. Tso WK,
    4. Liu CL,
    5. Lam CM,
    6. Poon RT,
    7. Fan ST,
    8. Wong J
    : Randomized controlled trial of transarterial lipiodol chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 35: 1164-1171, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Shibata J,
    2. Fujiyama S,
    3. Sato T,
    4. Kishimoto S,
    5. Fukushima S,
    6. Nakano M
    : Hepatic arterial injection chemotherapy with cisplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 64: 1586-1594, 1989.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kamada K,
    2. Nakanishi T,
    3. Kitamoto M,
    4. Aikata H,
    5. Kawakami Y,
    6. Ito K,
    7. Asahara T,
    8. Kajiyama G
    : Long-term prognosis of patients undergoing transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison of cisplatin lipiodol suspension and doxorubicin hydrochloride emulsion. J Vasc Interv Radiol 12: 847-854, 2001.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ikeda M,
    2. Maeda S,
    3. Ashihara H,
    4. Nagahama H,
    5. Tanaka M,
    6. Sasaki Y
    : Transcatheter arterial infusion chemotherapy with cisplatin-lipiodol suspension in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 45: 60-67, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Yodono H,
    2. Matsuo K,
    3. Shinohara A
    : A retrospective comparative study of epirubicin-lipiodol emulsion and cisplatin-lipiodol suspension for use with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Drugs 22: 277-282, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Okusaka T,
    2. Okada S,
    3. Nakanishi T,
    4. Fujiyama S,
    5. Kubo Y
    : Phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using a novel lipophilic platinum derivative (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 22: 169-176, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kawaoka T,
    2. Aikata H,
    3. Katamura Y,
    4. Takaki S,
    5. Waki K,
    6. Hiramatsu A,
    7. Takahashi S,
    8. Hieda M,
    9. Kakizawa H,
    10. Chayama K
    : Hypersensitivity reactions to transcatheter chemoembolization with cisplatin and Lipiodol suspension for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol 21: 1219-1225, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Hanada M,
    2. Baba A,
    3. Tsutsumishita Y,
    4. Noguchi T,
    5. Yamaoka T,
    6. Chiba N,
    7. Nishikaku F
    : Intra-hepatic arterial administration with miriplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent inhibits the growth of tumors implanted in rat livers by inducing platinum-DNA adducts to form and massive apoptosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64: 473-483, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Okabe K,
    2. Beppu T,
    3. Haraoka K,
    4. Oh-Uchida Y,
    5. Yamamura S,
    6. Tomiyasu S,
    7. Yamanaka T,
    8. Sano O,
    9. Masuda T,
    10. Chikamoto A,
    11. Fujiyama S,
    12. Baba H
    : Safety and short-term therapeutic effects of miriplatin-lipiodol suspension in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res 31: 2983-2988, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Okusaka T,
    2. Kasugai H,
    3. Ishii H,
    4. Kudo M,
    5. Sata M,
    6. Tanaka K,
    7. Shioyama Y,
    8. Chayama K,
    9. Kumada H,
    10. Yoshikawa M,
    11. Seki T,
    12. Saito H,
    13. Hayashi N,
    14. Shiratori K,
    15. Okita K,
    16. Sakaida I,
    17. Honda M,
    18. Kusumoto Y,
    19. Tsutsumi T,
    20. Sakata K
    : A randomized phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using SM-11355 (Miriplatin) for hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 30: 2015-2025, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Seko Y,
    2. Ikeda K,
    3. Kawamura Y,
    4. Fukushima T,
    5. Hara T,
    6. Sezaki H,
    7. Hosaka T,
    8. Akuta N,
    9. Suzuki F,
    10. Kobayashi M,
    11. Suzuki Y,
    12. Saitoh S,
    13. Arase Y,
    14. Kumada H
    : Antitumor efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with warmed miriplatin in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 43: 942-949, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Matsumoto T,
    2. Endo J,
    3. Hashida K,
    4. Ichikawa H,
    5. Kojima S,
    6. Takashimizu S,
    7. Watanabe N,
    8. Yamagami T,
    9. Hasebe T
    : Balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization using a 1.8-French tip coaxial microballoon catheter for hepatocellular carcinoma: technical and safety considerations. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 24: 94-100, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Arai H,
    2. Abe T,
    3. Takayama H,
    4. Toyoda M,
    5. Ueno T,
    6. Kakizaki S,
    7. Sato K
    : Safety and efficacy of balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using miriplatin for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 45: 663-666, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ogawa M,
    2. Takayasu K,
    3. Hirayama M,
    4. Miura T,
    5. Shiozawa K,
    6. Abe M,
    7. Matsumoto N,
    8. Nakagawara H,
    9. Ohshiro S,
    10. Yamamoto T,
    11. Tanaka N,
    12. Moriyama M,
    13. Mutou H,
    14. Yamamoto Y,
    15. Irie T
    : Efficacy of a microballoon catheter in transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma using miriplatin, a lipophilic anticancer drug: Short-term results. Hepatol Res 46: E60-69, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Matsumoto T,
    2. Endo J,
    3. Hashida K,
    4. Mizukami H,
    5. Nagata J,
    6. Ichikawa H,
    7. Kojima S,
    8. Takashimizu S,
    9. Yamagami T,
    10. Watanabe N,
    11. Hasebe T
    : Balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure before balloon-occluded transarterial chemoembolization. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 25: 22-28, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0, NCI, NIH, 2009. https://evs.nci.nih.gov/ftp1/CTCAE/CTCAE_4.03_2010-06-14_QuickReference_5x7.pdf
  16. ↵
    1. Fujiyama S,
    2. Shibata J,
    3. Maeda S,
    4. Tanaka M,
    5. Noumaru S,
    6. Sato K,
    7. Tomita K
    : Phase I clinical study of a novel lipophilic platinum complex (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to cisplatin/lipiodol. Br J Cancer 89: 1614-1619, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Ono Y,
    2. Yoshimasu T,
    3. Ashikaga R,
    4. Inoue M,
    5. Shindou H,
    6. Fuji K,
    7. Araki Y,
    8. Nishimura Y
    : Long-term results of lipiodol-transcatheter arterial embolization with cisplatin or doxorubicin for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 23: 564-568, 2000.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Ikeda M,
    2. Maeda S,
    3. Shibata J,
    4. Muta R,
    5. Ashihara H,
    6. Tanaka M,
    7. Fujiyama S,
    8. Tomita K
    : Transcatheter arterial chemotherapy with and without embolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 66: 24-31, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kawamura Y,
    2. Ikeda K,
    3. Hirakawa M,
    4. Hosaka T,
    5. Kobayashi M,
    6. Saitoh S,
    7. Yatsuji H,
    8. Sezaki H,
    9. Akuta N,
    10. Suzuki F,
    11. Suzuki Y,
    12. Arase Y,
    13. Kumada H
    : Efficacy of platinum analogue for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma unresponsive to transcatheter arterial chemoembolization with epirubicin. Hepatol Res 39: 346-354, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cromwell O,
    2. Pepys J,
    3. Parish WE,
    4. Hughes EG
    : Specific IgE antibodies to platinum salts in sensitized workers. Clin Allergy 9: 109-117, 1979.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 6
June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Feasibility and Safety of Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Miriplatin–Lipiodol Suspension for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
5 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Feasibility and Safety of Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Miriplatin–Lipiodol Suspension for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
TOMOHIRO MATSUMOTO, HITOSHI ICHIKAWA, JIN IMAI, TOSHIHIKO HAYASHI, KOSUKE TOMITA, TAKAHIKO MINE, SEIICHIRO KOJIMA, NORIHITO WATANABE, TERUMITSU HASEBE
Anticancer Research Jun 2017, 37 (6) 3183-3187;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Feasibility and Safety of Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization Using Miriplatin–Lipiodol Suspension for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
TOMOHIRO MATSUMOTO, HITOSHI ICHIKAWA, JIN IMAI, TOSHIHIKO HAYASHI, KOSUKE TOMITA, TAKAHIKO MINE, SEIICHIRO KOJIMA, NORIHITO WATANABE, TERUMITSU HASEBE
Anticancer Research Jun 2017, 37 (6) 3183-3187;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Angiographic Evaluation of Vascular Damage in Rat Liver After Administration of Epirubicin or Miriplatin
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Prophylactic Corticosteroid in Esophageal Cancer Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Remarkable and Durable Tumor Response to Pembrolizumab in Locally Advanced dMMR/MSI-H Rectal Cancer
  • Body Weight Loss at Recurrence as an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Recurrent Esophageal Cancer After Esophagectomy Who Receive First-line Treatment After Recurrence
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • transarterial chemoembolization
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • Miriplatin
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire