Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells and Therapeutic Approaches

GULINNAZ ERCAN, AYFER KARLITEPE and BULENT OZPOLAT
Anticancer Research June 2017, 37 (6) 2761-2775;
GULINNAZ ERCAN
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
2Department of Stem Cell, Institute of Health Sciences, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AYFER KARLITEPE
1Department of Medical Biochemistry, Ege University Medical School, Izmir, Turkey
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
BULENT OZPOLAT
3Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.A.
4Center for RNA Interference and Non-Coding RNA, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: bozpolat{at}mdanderson.org
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered one of the deadliest human cancers, with 1-5% 5-year survival rates (~6-month median survival duration) despite therapy; thus, PDAC represents an unmet therapeutic challenge. PDAC is the major histological subtype, comprising 90% of all pancreatic cancers. It is a highly complex and aggressive malignancy, presenting with early local invasion and metastasis, and is resistant to most therapies, all of which are believed to contribute to its extremely poor prognosis. PDAC is characterized by molecular alterations, including mutations of K-RAS (~90% of cases), TP53, transforming growth factor-β, Hedgehog, WNT and NOTCH signaling pathways. Given that cancer stem cells have a crucial role not only in tumor initiation and progression, but also in drug resistance and relapse or recurrence of various cancer types, they may be excellent targets for effective novel therapeutic approaches. Here, we reviewed recent therapeutic strategies targeting pancreatic cancer stem cells using chemotherapeutics and targeted drugs, non-coding RNAs (i.e., siRNA and miRNAs), immunotherapy, and natural compounds.

  • Pancreatic cancer
  • cancer stem cells
  • polyphenolic
  • microRNA
  • targeted therapy
  • immunotherapy
  • drug resistance
  • review

Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic cancer (PaCa) is currently the third most common cause of cancer-related death in the United States (1-4). Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a major histological subtype, comprising of 90% of all PaCas (1). Although both the exocrine and endocrine cells of the pancreas can form cancer, tumors of the endocrine pancreas are less common; they are known as islet cell tumors (such as insulinomas, glucagonomas, and somatostatinomas) and neuroendocrine tumors (such as gastrinomas). PaCa formed by exocrine cells is much more common; nearly all of these tumors are adenocarcinomas (2).

PDAC has an extremely poor prognosis, with 5-year survival rates of 1-5% (~6-month median survival duration) with currently available therapies (5). The majority of patients with PDAC (80-90%) have local metastasis at the time of diagnosis. These patients cannot benefit from surgery and instead undergo standard-of-care medical treatment using chemotherapeutics, including gemcitabine, or a combination of 5-flurouracil (5-FU) plus leucovorin (6). The high mortality rate of PDAC is attributed to its aggressive nature, early local and advanced metastasis, its intrinsic resistance to chemotherapeutics, and absence of effective therapies. In addition, lack of early diagnostic tests prevents early therapeutic interventions, and is considered to be an important factor that contributes to the poor prognosis of PDAC (4).

Biology and Genetics of PaCa

Pancreatic intra-epithelial neoplasms (PanINs) are the most common precursors of PDAC; they develop in a background of pancreatic inflammation. K-RAS is mutated in approximately 90% of all PDACs and is found in almost all PanINs (7). Although K-RAS mutation is necessary for carcinogenesis and subsequent PDAC tumor maintenance, it is not sufficient to drive PanINs to develop into PDAC (8). In addition to K-RAS, mutations in tumor suppressors, including cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) (encoding p16INK4A protein), mothers against decapentaplegic homolog 4 (SMAD4), and TP53, are required for malignant transformation (9). More than 60 molecular alterations related to apoptotic pathways and Hedgehog (HH), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), WNT, and NOTCH signaling pathways have been identified in PDAC (10, 11).

PDAC is also characterized by an excessive desmoplastic response, with generation of dense fibrotic tissue, an altered extracellular matrix, and hypovascularity that may be caused by HHS signaling (12). Highly dense fibrotic tissue constitutes 90% of the tumor volume; it is considered a barrier to effective drug delivery and prevents the penetration of therapeutics into tumor tissues. The other characteristic feature of PDAC is that it is resistant to chemotherapy-induced apoptosis due to intrinsic and acquired resistance to such therapies, and the presence of PaCa cancer stem cells (CSCs) (13). Recent emerging data indicate that CSCs are an important factor that contributes to the complex biology, tumorigenesis, progression, and poor clinical outcome of PDAC (14).

Normal and Cancer Stem Cells

Normal adult stem cells are tissue-specific cells that exhibit unique biological properties, including the ability to self renew and differentiate into various mature cells of specific tissues. Functionally, these cells undergo an unlimited number of asymmetrical cell divisions, and with each division, they produce at least one daughter progenitor cell that maintains their indefinite self-renewing capacity (15). When adult stem cells divide asymmetrically, they can also produce cells that have limited division capacity, ultimately differentiating into mature cells (16). Since adult cells such as epithelial and blood cells undergo continuous cellular turnover, adult stem cells form a pool of long-lived cells that provide a continuous supply of differentiated cells for the homeostatic control of specific tissue compartments (17).

Small subpopulation of cancer cells, CSCs, contribute to tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis; therapy resistance; and cancer recurrence (14, 18). They were first identified in acute myelogenous leukemia and subsequently in many solid cancer types, including PaCa (19). CSCs share core regulatory pathways with normal stem cells but have diversely distinct reprogrammed pathways. Like normal pluripotent stem cells, CSCs have both self-renewal and multilineage differentiation capacities (20). While normal pluripotent stem cells have tightly controlled self-renewal and committed lineage differentiation capacities, which prevent tumor development, CSCs have the capability to differentiate into multiple cell types, leading to tumor initiation and progression (21). CSCs can give rise to both more CSCs and progeny that ultimately differentiate into the different cell types in a tumor by dividing indefinitely. CSCs also give rise to tumors that phenotypically resemble their tissue of origin, either in their morphological characteristics or in their expression of tissue-specific genes (17). CSCs have quiescent potential in a dormant state and may be involved in both resistance to apoptosis and induction of angiogenesis. Thus, CSCs are not only considered tumor-initiating cells but also as cells that promote tumor development and therapy resistance, leading to disease progression and relapse (14, 18, 19, 22).

According to the CSC hypothesis, cancer-initiating cells are transformed tissue stem cells that are normally found in low numbers among the heterogeneous cells that comprise the malignant tumor mass; they retain the essential characteristic feature of self-protection through the activity of multiple drug resistance (MDR) transporters (23). Understanding the central role of MDR transporters in the protection and self-renewal of normal stem cells and CSCs may lead to the characterization of their differences, which could be used to develop therapeutic approaches that target CSCs. Strategies that only target cancer cells would not be sufficient to eliminate cancer or control the growth and progression of the disease (24).

In summary, tumor initiation, propagation, metastasis, and relapse are caused by a tiny subpopulation of cells called CSCs that are localized among cancer cells and have stem cell-like properties, with clonal long-term repopulation and self-renewal capacities. Due to their hierarchical organization, CSCs and non-CSC tumor cells share the same mutational and genetic background; however, CSCs are exclusively tumorigenic and therapy resistant (25). Thus, while developing therapeutic agents that are aimed to target and eliminate CSCs successfully, one should also consider the heterogeneity of CSCs (26). CSCs carry more differentiated cell features and characteristics among different cancer subtypes even in the same tumor and at different stages of progression. Thus, while CSCs undergo a differentiation process and give rise to tumor cells, there may be different markers at different stages of the cancer.

PaCa Stem Cells

Several common stem cell markers have been identified as CSC-specific markers in CSC subpopulations isolated from a wide variety of human cancer types and cell lines. These include octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (OCT4), sex determining region Y-box 2 (SOX2), homeobox protein (NANOG), tyrosine-protein kinase Kit (C-KIT), ATP-binding cassette sub-family G member 2 (ABCG2), cluster of differentiaition (CD) CD34, CD44, CD123, CD133, CD44V6, tyrosine-protein kinase Met (C-MET), tetraspanin-8 (TSPAN8), integrin (A6B4), C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4), claudin7, epithelial-specific antigen (ESA), and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) (18,19,22). Classically, CSCs are first isolated using techniques such as flow cytometry or magnetic bead sorting and then implanted in immunocompromised mice to determine their efficiency in tumor initiation and progression in vivo (18).

Although many markers have been identified for pancreatic CSCs, which represent fewer than 1% of all PaCa cells, a universal marker is still lacking. Markers that have been used in identifying neoplastic and non-neoplastic stem cells include CD44, CD24, CD133, ESA, ALDH1, and Hoechst dye exclusion (side population) (18). CD133, ALDH1, and the triplet combination of CD24+CD44+ESA+ are the best established PaCa CSC markers (18, 19, 22). CD44+/CD24+/ESA+ cells were found to be much more tumorigenic than were marker-negative PaCa cells and possessed the capacity to self-renew and differentiate into different progeny cancer cell types. When injected into non-obese diabetic (NOD)/severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) mice, these CSCs self renewed and produced differentiated progeny. They had a 100-fold increased tumorigenic potential and maintained their surface marker phenotype after repeated passages as xenografts. In concordance with these findings, clinical data suggest that CD44 positivity is a poor prognostic indicator in patients with PaCa (17).

A pancreatic CSC population with CD133 expression exhibited increased tumorigenicity, a metastatic phenotype and more resistance to chemotherapy than did CD133− cells. During serial passages, CD133+ cells retained their ability to self-renew and generate differentiated non-tumorigenic descendants to reconstruct hierarchically organized tumors in an orthotopic mouse model. (27) In PaCa, a CD44+/CD133+ cell population has also been demonstrated in both tumor specimens and PaCa cell lines. Meanwhile, CD44+/CD133+ MiaPaCa2 cells, which express high levels of NOTCH and BCL2, were found to have a strong capacity to form tumorspheres in vitro and initiated tumors in a mouse xenograft model in vivo (28). CD44+/CD133+ cells isolated from the PANC-1 cell line were also capable of forming tumorspheres in vitro, exhibited tumor-initiating potential in vivo, and profoundly responded to WNT pathway inhibition (22). Moreover, high expression levels of both CD44 and CD133 were also found to be associated with a poor prognosis in patients with PaCa (22).

CD133+ (cytokeratin−) cells from human PaCa tissues displayed high tumorigenic potential (14). In a series of experiments, CD44+CD24+ESA+ cells (comprising 0.2-0.8% of the total cell population), identified by fluorescence-activated cell sorting from primary human cancer tissues, were implanted in immune-compromised mice. A small volume of tumor cells was consistently observed (18). When engrafted into nude mice, an even smaller number of CD133+ cells (fewer than 500) routinely led to the formation of tumors; although these cells were highly tumorigenic, CD133− cells were not able to induce tumor formation (18).

In addition to cell surface markers, the cellular molecule ALDH1, which catalyzes the oxidation of intracellular aldehydes and converts retinol to retinoic acid, was also implicated as a stem cell marker in PaCa due to its role in the early differentiation of stem cells (18, 22). ALDH1+ cells, which have a higher clonogenic capacity than do ALDH1− cells, were shown to be highly tumorigenic, able to initiate tumor development at low cell numbers, and undergo epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) (22). Recently, CD133+/CXCR4+ cells were found to exert a more invasive and metastatic phenotype (15, 22). CD133+/CXCR4+ CSCs were detected in the invasive margin of pancreatic tumors, and removal of this subpopulation was shown to prevent tumor metastasis (14, 22). Moreover, the ligand of CXCR4, stromal cell-derived factor-1, was shown to enhance the in vitro chemotactic migration of CD133+/CXCR4+ PaCa cells, while this migration was blocked by CXCR4 blocking/inhibiting antibodies (17). In addition, eliminating CD133+/CXCR4+ cells by AMD-3100, which targets CXCR4, prevented the development of liver metastases in mice without affecting tumor-initiating ability (17). Since CD133+ PaCa cells represent distinct CSC subpopulations, all these markers (CD24+/CD44+/ESA+/CD133+/CXCR4+, or even more markers, such as ALDH1) may be required for CSC enrichment (4, 19, 22).

Signaling Pathways Important for Pancreatic CSCs

Signaling pathways have been implicated in PaCa tumorigenesis, prognosis, and resistance to therapy; thus, the identification of these pathways is considered a promising therapeutic strategy for the development of molecularly targeted therapies (18). CSCs are likely regulated by developmental pathways similar to those that regulate normal stem cells, including NOTCH, HH, WNT, polycomb complex protein (BMI1), and phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) (17-19). Understanding the role of these key signaling pathways in CSC maintenance may lead to promising therapeutic targets in the treatment of PaCa and other types of cancer (22).

NOTCH signaling pathway. The NOTCH signaling pathway is considered a potential contributor to CSC maintenance and plays an important role in regulating the balance between self-renewal and differentiation during normal pancreatic tissue development (19, 22). Several studies have shown that pancreatic CSCs express high levels of NOTCH1 and NOTCH2 (22). NOTCH signaling is inhibited by the γ-secretase inhibitor (γ-SI), which leads to the depletion of pancreatic CSCs and impaired function (22). Up-regulation of several NOTCH pathway components in pancreatic CSCs compared to PaCa cells has been shown, and the inhibition of Hes family BHLH transcription factor 1 (HES1) (a key NOTCH target gene) by a γ-SI or small interfering RNA (siRNA) reduces pancreatic CSC self-renewal and tumorigenicity (22). Interestingly, although the NOTCH pathway has been shown to regulate the HH pathway by repressing γ-SI by HES1, no significant changes were observed in HH signaling components when NOTCH signaling was inhibited (29).

NOTCH signaling is also known to contribute to the regulation of EMT. Acquisition of the EMT phenotype in gemcitabine-resistant PaCa cells was found to be consistent with the up-regulation of NOTCH2, NOTCH4, and CD339 (JAGGED-1). Inhibition of NOTCH signaling using siRNA partially reversed the EMT phenotype. Collectively, these findings indicate that the NOTCH pathway is involved in the self-renewal of pancreatic CSCs and the EMT process (22). Therefore, the NOTCH signaling pathway represents a promising therapeutic target for targeting pancreatic CSCs and metastasis.

Hedgehog signaling. The HH pathway is an evolutionarily-conserved pathway essential for self-renewal of CSCs. It isrequired for normal stem and progenitor functionsas well as pancreatic morphogenesis and cellular differentiation; thus, dysregulation of HH signaling is considered one of the key events in PaCa pathogenesis (30). Transgenic mice that overexpressed Sonic HH (SHH), a ligand of HH signaling, in the pancreatic endoderm developed PanIN-like lesions that contained K-RAS mutations and overexpressed human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2/neu), revealing that the HH signaling pathway plays an early role in pancreatic tumorigenesis. Recent evidence also demonstrated that SHH and the other HH signaling components are highly expressed in pancreatic CSCs, but not in normal pancreatic stem cells or pancreatic ductal epithelial cells (22). The natural compounds sulforaphane, epigallocatechin-3 gallate (EGCG), and quercetin have been reported to impede the self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs by attenuating the HH signaling pathway (31), indicating that HH signaling plays an important role in pancreatic CSCs.

WNT/β-catenin pathway. Activation of the WNT/β-catenin pathway has been shown to be involved in PaCa development and progression (32). Although aberrant cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of β-catenin is frequently found in PaCa and PanIN tissue samples, it is not found in normal pancreatic tissues. High transcriptional activity of WNT/β-catenin in PaCa is associated with poor disease-specific patient survival, indicating the clinical significance of this pathway (22). Activation of the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway in CSCs leads to resistance to conventional therapies. Increased activation of WNT/β-catenin signaling results in an enhanced stem cell–like phenotype of PaCa (33).

Other pathways important to pancreatic CSCs. In addition to the above-mentioned embryonic signaling pathways, other signaling pathways, such as autophagy, forkhead box protein M1 (FOXM1) signaling, interleukin 8 (IL8/CXCR1), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR), and NODAL/ACTIVIN signaling pathways, and the K-RAS/c-Jun-NH2-kinase (JNK) axis have also been shown to be involved in the regulation of PaCa CSC activity (22); however, the significance of these signaling pathways has not been clarified.

Major Obstacles and Potential Strategies for Targeting Pancreatic CSCs

CSC drug resistance. CSCs are thought to be intrinsically resistant to chemotherapeutic agents and radiation therapy, although the mechanism of this resistance is not entirely clear (18). Cancer cells that acquire resistance to chemotherapeutic agents may display cross-resistance to a broad spectrum of structurally-unrelated drugs due to MDR (34). The most common drug resistance mechanisms include metabolic inactivation, efflux of the drug from the cells, and mutation or overexpression of the drug target (35). Numerous studies have revealed that the MDR phenotype in tumors is associated with the overexpression of certain drug efflux transporter proteins, the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters (36). These proteins bind ATP and use the energy to transport various molecules across cell membranes, reducing the effects of the drugs in cancer cells. This is also one of the principal mechanisms for protecting stem cells. Therefore, there is renewed attention being paid to the role of ABC transporters in CSC biology (35).

Transporters such as P-glycoprotein (ABCB1), breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2), and the MDR-associated protein (ABCC1) have been identified in CSCs (37) and are considered to be important targets for overcoming drug resistance. Among these, P-gp, an ABC transporter with broad substrate specificity, is considered to be the most significant factor in the failure of treatment for leukemia and many solid tumors. ABCG2 seems to play an important role in CSC resistance to anticancer drugs in clinical applications (38). These mechanisms have been shown to be responsible for resistance in brain, colon, and pancreatic cancer (18). In drug-resistant cancer cells, increased CD133 expression and the regulation of protein kinase B (AKT) signaling were shown to be associated with high ABCG2 levels (36). Improved DNA repair, a low mitotic rate, increased ALDH oxidation of aldehydes or detoxification, and resistance to apoptosis are also thought to be involved in mediating chemotherapeutic resistance, while increased repair capacity of the DNA damage checkpoint is involved in radiotherapy resistance in CSCs. (39)

Quiescence of CSCs. CSCs are presumably arrested at a G0-like cell-cycle phase or checkpoint. Since the quiescent state of these CSCs may account for many treatment failures, the only effective way to treat cancer is to target CSCs by blocking their ability to self-renew and generate multilineage differentiation (40).

Stem-cell ‘niche’. An in vivo or in vitro stem cell ‘niche’, a specific microenvironment for CSCs, has also been proposed to contribute to resistance via various mechanisms, including MDR and ABC transporters. EMT, inflammation, hypoxia, and angiogenesis further contribute to the regulation of CSCs. Thus, the CSC niche needs to be targeted since this specific microenvironment plays important roles in tumor growth, metastasis, and response to standard therapies.

Furthermore, stemness markers have been shown to be linked to chemoresistance in PaCa. CD133+ cells isolated from patients with PaCa have been shown to be significantly more resistant to gemcitabine than are CD133− cells (41). Prolonged gemcitabine exposure leads to a decrease in tumor size in xenograft models while causing an increase in the CD133+ cell fraction in a dose-dependent manner. Similar results have been observed for CSCs after 5-FU exposure. On the other hand, stem cell markers such as CD44+CD24+ESA+ have also been found to be expressed in cells that are resistant to both gemcitabine therapy and radiotherapy. Interestingly, gemcitabine treatment eliminates only the bulk of tumor cells while leaving both the CD44+-enriched cell population and a small subset of CD44+CD24+ESA+ cells that are capable of proliferating and regenerating tumor. In an in vitro study, it was shown that high-dose gemcitabine eliminated most PaCa cells while failing to eliminate CD44+ and CD44+/CD24+CSCs; proliferating CD44+ CSCs generated resistant PaCa cells (42). Clinical data confirmed this finding, showing that patients with PaCa with a poor prognosis have CD44 positivity (43). These findings suggest that PaCa CD44+/CD24+CSCs are responsible for gemcitabine resistance and, thus, poor prognosis. A study also demonstrated that gemcitabine-resistant human PaCa tissues, which are rich in PaCa CD133+ CSCs, are highly tumorigenic, as they are capable both of forming colonies and resisting conventional chemotherapy (44). A cell adhesion molecule called CXCR4, the receptor for CXCL12 (stromal cell-derived factor-1, SDF1) that was found only at the invasive margin of the tumor, was shown to be responsible for the difference in response to therapies, leading to metastasis in a murine model (18).

Potential Therapies Targeting CSCs

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) inhibitors. While investigating the molecular mechanisms underlying chemoresistance to 5-FU and gemcitabine therapies in PaCa, Suziki et al. discovered that the JNK pathway, through suppression of intracellular ROS levels, plays a critical role in the development of resistance in pancreatic CSCs (45). Targeting the JNK–ROS axis, in combination with 5FU or gemcitabine-based regimens, may be a promising approach to eliminating pancreatic CSCs for the more successful treatment of PaCa.

Acetyl salicylic acid. Aspirin was shown to inhibit cell signaling for self-renewal capacity, tumor growth, and invasion by inhibiting markers of inflammation, and it sensitized CSCs to gemcitabine-mediated cytotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo. It has been demonstrated that aspirin can inhibit the characteristic features of CSCs through inhibition of inflammatory activity, self-renewal potential, stem cell marker expression, tumor growth, metastasis and stromal reaction, and can enhance the efficacy of gemcitabine (46).

mTOR inhibitors. Since the mTOR signaling pathway is aberrantly activated in various human malignancies and plays a crucial role in CSCs, mTOR inhibitors have been proposed and used as a novel strategy for eliminating CSCs. Various mTOR inhibitors, including rapamycin, everolimus, temsirolimus, and ridaforolimus, have been used to target CSCs (47). Gemcitabine treatment of PaCa cell lines or cells derived from primary human PaCa tumors leads to enrichment of the CD133+ CSC population. Rapamycin reduces the viability of CD133+ PaCa cells and sphere formation, which is indicative of the self-renewal of stem-like cells, indicating that the mTOR pathway maintains cancer stem-like cells (48, 49). Combining gemcitabine with rapamycin has been found to highly suppress CSC survival, suggesting that mTOR inhibitors may be used especially in combination with standard therepies to target CSCs (48, 49).

Metformin. Metformin is an anti-diabetic drug that has been implicated in targeting CSCs, including pancreatic CSCs; it reduces the expression of self-renewal-associated genes such as NANOG, OCT4, and SOX2 in cells that are positive for CD133, CD44, CXCR4, and stage-specific embryonic antigen 1 (SSEA1). Metformin exerts its action by activating the liver kinase B1- AMP-activated protein kinase (LKB1–AMPK) axis and thereby indirectly inhibiting the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) (52). Mohammed et al. investigated the effect of metformin on PanIN, and found that the incidence of PDAC was reduced by about 20% with metformin treatment; while tumor weight and tumor metastasis were also decreased in a dose-dependent manner in mice (53).

The expression of CSC markers in pancreatic tissue were found to be significantly reduced; as indicated by lower levels of CD44-, CD133-, ALDH1- and epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM)-positive cells. These results suggest that the biological effects of metformin are mediated by a decreased number of CSCs, indicating that metformin has significant potential for targeting pancreatic CSCs (54).

Metformin was also found to increase ROS production in CSCs and reduce mitochondrial transmembrane potential by hampering the cells' self-renewal capacity; it significantly reduced the size and number of tumor spheres and delayed the formation of secondary and tertiary tumorspheres. In cancer cells, metformin reduces cell proliferation and protein synthesis (55).

Glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1) inhibitors. CSCs are dependent on glycolysis for their survival and growth; thus, glucose metabolism is even more active in CSCs. Such increase in glucose metabolism is now known to be a hallmark of cancer (54). GLUT1 is a facilitative glucose transporter that is essential for the maintenance of pancreatic CSCs, and a specific GLUT1 inhibitor, WZB117, was found to be capable of suppressing the self-renewal and tumor-initiating capacities of CSCs without compromising their proliferative potential in vitro via inhibition of GLUT1. The systemic administration of WZB117 also inhibited tumor initiation in vivo after CSC implantation without causing significant side-effects in host animals. Since these results indicate that GLUT1-dependent glucose metabolism has a crucial role not only in the growth and survival of CSCs but also in the maintenance of their stemness, GLUT1 may also be considered a promising target for CSC-directed cancer therapy (56).

Histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors. HDAC inhibitors, including suberylanilidehydroxamic acid (SAHA), reactivate aberrantly silenced genes by restoring histone acetylation. SAHA has been shown to inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in many types of human cancer by activating caspase-3, caspase-9, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) cleavage, cytochrome c release, and the up-regulation of FAS and FAS ligand expression. A combination of SAHA and the SMOOTHENED antagonist SANT1 was shown to suppress cell growth and induce apoptosis in gemcitabine-resistant PaCa cell lines. Moreover, SAHA was shown to be capable of inhibiting cell growth and inducing apoptosis, differentiation, and cell cycle arrest by up-regulating p21, CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (C/EBPa), retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARA), and E-cadherin while down-regulating cyclin B1, cyclin D1, and c-MYC, suggesting that it is a promising therapeutic agent for human pancreatic CSCs (54).

Salinomycin. Salinomycin is another drug that is used to target CD133+ pancreatic CSCs; it was shown to be effective at eradicating PaCa xenografts in mice when used in combination with gemcitabine (57). The mechanism of action by which salinomycin kills CSCs specifically is not well established but it is thought to function as a potassium ionophore. Salinomycin and its derivatives exert significant antiproliferative activity towards drug-resistant cancer cell lines. Salinomycin can induce apoptosis of human cancer cells and effectively eliminate CSCs and induce partial clinical regression of heavily pretreated and therapy-resistant cancer (58).

Sorafenib. Sorafenib is an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved small inhibitor of several tyrosine protein kinases, such as vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor, and serine/threonine-protein kinase (RAF) family kinases. Sorafenib is used for the treatment of advanced kidney and liver cancer and has been shown to target pancreatic CSCs and induce apoptosis and decrease proliferation, spheroid formation, clonogenicity, ALDH1 activity, and angiogenesis. Its use leads to an increase in survival (59, 60). Sulforaphane, an isothiocyanate found in broccoli, was shown to eliminate pancreatic CSCs by down-regulating NF-ĸB activity without inducing toxic side-effects; this activity was enhanced when it was combined with sorafenib (61).

Irinotecan plus gemcitabine. Recently, Qin et al. developed an electrospun scaffold made of polycaprolactone and gelatin to facilitate the survival and tumorigenesis of CD24+CD44+ CSCs in PaCa tumor murine models in vivo; they found increases in both tumor formation incidence and in vivo tumor growth and concluded that the homogeneous nature of CD24+CD44+ CSCs significantly reduced the biological variation of PaCa tumor masses harvested from patients. When they evaluated the therapeutic effect of irinotecan plus gemcitabine on murine models of pancreatic tumor in vivo, they discovered that it was a promising chemotherapy for PaCa because of its devastating influence on CD24+CD44+ pancreatic CSCs (62).

Carbon ion beam. Combined with gemcitabine, carbon ion beam therapy has a superior effect on pancreatic CSCs and tumor growth in vitro and in vivo at relatively low doses in comparison to carbon ion beam alone or conventional x-ray irradiation. Carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine synergistically enhanced the death of pancreatic CSCs by inhibiting DNA repair, as well as by inducing irreparable complex DNA damage via increasing apoptosis and autophagy and inhibiting cell proliferation at relatively low doses compared to carbon ion beam alone. Taken together, these results demonstrate the benefits of carbon ion beams in combination with chemotherapy in targeting conventional radioresistant locally advanced PaCa (63).

Inhibitors of facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT). CBL0137 is a member of a new class of recently discovered candidate anticancer agents that target FACT (SSRP1 and SPT16 subunits), as monotherapy or in combination with gemcitabine. In patient-derived PDAC xenografts and PANC-1 orthotopic tumors, CBL0137 inhibited gemcitabine-induced CSC enrichment; this, together with the in vivo data, make CBL0137 a reasonable and promising adjuvant treatment for gemcitabine since CBL0137 kills the CSCs while gemcitabine eliminates the remaining bulk population. As a result, CBL0137 is effective at preventing cancer recurrence (64).

Insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF1R) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors. The impact of the concurrent inhibition of IGF1R and EGFR (HER2) has been shown in PaCa cell lines and particularly in pancreatic CSCs. NVP-AEW541 and lapatinib in combination simultaneously inhibited IGFIR and ERBB receptors/HER2 and thus prevented the resistance observed at the molecular level with individual treatments. Interestingly, these inhibitors eliminated PaCa cells and overcame their resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Thus, the synergy observed with this combined treatment indicates that the appropriate combination of currently known anticancer agents is efficient at maximizing patient benefit (65).

Carboxypeptidase inhibitors. Latexin is the only known mammalian carboxypeptidase inhibitor; it is an antigen expressed in a subset of neurons in the rat cerebral cortex, as well as in various types of non-neural tissues, such as heart, prostate, ovary, kidney, pancreas and colon tissue. Latexin shares 30% sequence similarity with tazarotene-induced gene 1, which is down-regulated or absent in many tumor subtypes. Xue et al. investigated the differential expression of latexin in both CD133+ PaCa stem-like cells and CD133− PaCa cells. They tested the effect of exogenous latexin in inducing apoptosis and inhibiting proliferation in CD133+ PaCa stem-like cells and studied the underlying mechanisms. It was demonstrated that latexin induces apoptosis in and inhibits the proliferation of CD133+ pancreatic CSCs derived from MiaPaca-2 by modulating the BCL2 family and c-MYC; thus, targeting latexin may be a new therapeutic strategy for PaCa (66).

Role of MicroRNA (miRNA, miR) in Pancreatic CSCs

MicroRNAs (miRNAs are endogenous non-coding short RNAs (length of 21-23 nucleotides) encoded by nuclear DNA that are involved in the posttranscriptional regulation of gene expression. By binding to specific sequences of messenger RNA (mRNA) complementarily, they lead to gene silencing via translational repression or target degradation. miRNAs play a crucial role in various developmental, metabolic, and cellular processes, such as apoptosis, cell proliferation and differentiation, by altering the expression of proto-oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes and thus regulating their levels in various tumor tissues (67). Moreover, miRNAs have a crucial role in tumorigenesis: an important alteration is found in the expression of proto-oncogenes or tumor-suppressor genes in cancer, including PaCa, which is associated with clinical prognosis, therapy resistance and tumor recurrence or relapse. By affecting signaling pathways and CSC signature genes, miRNAs are also able to regulate CSC characteristics (68). Indeed, several microRNAs have already been implicated in the regulation of normal stem cells and CSCs.

miR-1181 was recently shown to inhibit stemness and tumorigenicity. miR-1181 expression suppressed the CSC phenotypes of PaCa by targeting SOX2 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) (69). SOX2 has an important function during embryonic development and is involved in the maintenance of CSC phenotypes by directly targeting the genes that control tumor survival, proliferation, stemness, and invasion. SOX2 is overexpressed in both poorly differentiated PaCa and highly invasive PaCa. STAT3 is frequently overexpressed in PaCa and plays an important role in its pathogenesis. Since miR-1181 was found to be down-regulated in PaCa cell lines and clinical patient tissues, its therapeutic delivery and expression in PaCa tumors may be an important strategy in targeting pancreatic CSCs and cancer cells (69). miR-21 and miR-221 are up-regulated in pancreatic CSCs and contribute to important biological functions in cancer progression by promoting cell proliferation and migration and chemotherapy resistance. Inhibition of miR-21 and miR-221 by targeting CSCs may be a therapeutic strategy for PaCa (70).

miR-17-92 cluster: Epigenetic mechanisms may also account for the strong phenotypical differences seen in CSCs. The miR-17-92 cluster is down-regulated in chemoresistant CSCs. NODAL/ACTIVIN/TGFβ1 signaling, which promotes chemoresistance in CSCs, is inhibited by the miR-17-92 cluster. Overexpression of miR-17-92 leads to the abrogation of CSC phenotypes and the eventual loss of the in vivo tumorigenicity of CSCs (71).

LIN28B is an RNA-binding protein that regulates cell growth and differentiation. A novel CSC subpopulation that overexpresses both CD44 and LIN28B at the cell surface is found in human primary PaCa tissues; this CD44+/LIN28B+ pancreatic CSC subpopulation proliferates rapidly and exhibits MDR, highly invasive ability, and high adherin levels. Therefore, CD44+/LIN28B+ pancreatic CSCs may represent a powerful in vitro model, either to study cancer cell metastasis, invasion, and self-renewal or to assess the effectiveness of novel therapeutics for PDAC. CD44+/LIN28B+ pancreatic CSCs were more resistant to growth inhibition when cisplatin and gemcitabine hydrochloride were used as chemotherapeutic drugs and rapidly and easily formed tumors in vivo. siRNA interference in endogenous LIN28b gene expression in these CD44+/LIN28B+ pancreatic CSCs not only reduced their proliferation but also inhibited the cell cycle due to the suppression of cyclin D1 expression after the stimulation of miRNA LET-7B expression (72).

miR-1246 has been shown to induce chemoresistance and contributes to CSC stemness in PaCa cell lines. miR-1246 targets and controls the function of the cyclin-G2 (CCNG2) tumor suppressor gene. Given that CCNG2 participates in inhibiting cancer proliferation, invasion, differentiation, and chemoresistance, which characterize CSCs, CCNG2 inhibition may be at least partially responsible for the maintenance of CSC-like spheroid cells. CCNG2 expression is negatively correlated with miR-1246 expression, suggesting that the miR-1246–CCNG2 axis is critical for chemoresistance and can be used to control CSCs (73).

miR-335: An miRNA array assay showed that miR-335 is linked to OCT4 expression in PaCa. When OCT4-overexpressing cells were infected with LV-miR-335, migration and invasion decreased as did levels of the mesenchymal markers fibronectin, vimentin, α-Smooth muscle actin, and snail family transcriptional repressor 1, while those of the epithelial marker E-cadherin increased in PaCa cells, suggesting that miR-335 can inhibit metastasis and EMT in PaCa cells. Systemically delivered miR-335 was found to inhibit PaCa metastasis and extend animal survival (74).

Immunotherapy for Pancreatic CSCs

Immunotherapy is a promising strategy that offers a complementary method for successfully treating cancer. The current strategies consist of cancer vaccines as active immunization, monoclonal antibodies as passive immunization, and cellular therapies that often include lymphocytes and dendritic cells. Cancer vaccines may be effective at preventing cancer by attacking various tumor cells, inducing an immune response (75).

Interferon-γ (IFNγ) belongs to a group of type-I interferons and exerts its cellular activity by binding to a specific membrane receptor on the surface of many types of cells, including malignant cells. IFNγ shows its therapeutic effects by improving the differentiation, maturation, and function of dendritic cells, enhancing the survival of T-cells through the expression of anti-apoptotic genes, generating CD8+ memory cells, enhancing macrophage activities, and activating natural killer cells and has already been approved for clinical cancer therapies of melanoma and renal cell carcinoma. Interestingly, IFNγ up-regulates the expression of the CSC markers CD24, CD44, and CD133 in in vitro and in vivo models of PDAC in correlation with the original level of surface marker expression. While IFNγ has a certain cytotoxic effect on PDAC cells and reduces their numbers, it conversely enhances the enrichment of PDAC CSCs. Given that IFNγ's effects on the migration and invasion of PDAC cells are associated with the level of CSC marker expression in vivo, IFN may promote metastasis in the early stage of tumor growth while inhibiting tumor growth; thus, it needs to be carefully considered as a therapeutic option in PDAC (76).

EpCAM is a marker of poor prognosis and is overexpressed in many types of human cancer, including PaCa. Therapies targeting EpCAM can inhibit various types of cancer. Recently, catumaxomab, a bi-specific antibody that binds to EpCAM on tumor cells and CD3 on T-cells for activation, was approved by the FDA to treat malignant ascites. The combination of catumaxomab and activated T-cells has been shown to eradicate pancreatic CSCs. Pre-treatment with catumaxomab, followed by the addition of IL2/OKT3-activated autologous T-cells, eliminated CSCs during a short incubation period. Moreover, the CSCs, which became more aggressive when MU-PK1 cells were cultured under hypoxic conditions were successfully lysed by the combination of cytokine-activated killer T-cells with catumaxomab. In conclusion, catumaxomab combined with activated T-cells may be a potent therapeutic modality for eradicating chemoresistant pancreatic CSCs (77).

CSC vaccines: Pancreatic CSCs that were isolated from tumor specimens and cultured were used to produce a vaccine that was evaluated for its safety and efficacy in low-, medium-, and high-dose groups (78). When comparison of pre- and post-vaccination immunity was made; it was found to be significantly strengthened in the high-dose group with no side-effects, suggesting that the pancreatic CSC vaccine is safe and effective. However, from the viewpoint of a long-term curative effect, the benefit of the CSC vaccine on progression-free survival and overall survival requires further refinement (78).

Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent antigen-presenting cells that play a crucial role in inducing primary immune responses against tumor-associated antigens. To generate anti-tumor immune responses, DCs have been charged with pancreatic CSC antigens (79). After being co-cultured with lymphocytes at different ratios, the lysate-exposed DCs effectively promoted lymphocyte proliferation and induced the secretion of high levels of INFγ and IL2, which are strong antitumor cytokines. The DCs had significant cytotoxic effects on Panc-1 CSCs and parental Panc-1 cells.

Natural Dietary Compounds Against Pancreatic CSCs

Recently, dietary compounds have gained substantial attention for their potential therapeutic applications in cancer, leading to the novel term ‘nutraceutical’, generated by combining the words nutrition and pharmaceutical. Indeed, nutraceuticals, particularly soy isoflavone genistein, curcumin, resveratrol, quercetin, EGCG, and lycopene, can inhibit not only cancer cells but also CSCs in PaCa and other cancer types (80).

Genistein. Soybeans are rich in natural phytoestrogenic isoflavones, particularly genistein, daidzein, and glycitein. Genistein (4,5,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) has multiple biological effects in various human cancer types, with low toxicity towards normal cells (81). Genistein inhibits cell growth, migration, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis through the regulation of multiple cellular signaling pathways, including the inhibition of NF-ĸB, WNT, NOTCH1, and HH pathways, and by acting as a protein tyrosine kinase inhibitor (mostly of EGFR) in human cancer (82). Genistein inhibits cell growth and pancreatosphere formation and reduces the expression of CSC surface markers, mainly by down-regulating the NOTCH pathway. Moreover, it has been shown to induce apoptosis in PaCa cell lines by inhibiting NF- and NOTCH1 signaling. Genistein attenuates β-catenin-mediated expression of WNT downstream target genes in mammary epithelial cells by up-regulating E-cadherin. It modulates the expression of genes involved in cellular functions, such as proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis, particularly by inhibiting or down-regulating the AKT and NF-ĸB pathways (83). Genistein is also capable of potentiating the antitumor effects of chemotherapeutic agents (e.g., gemcitabine, cisplatin, andoxaliplatin) by modulating the apoptotic pathways (84). In orthotopic animal models, genistein combined with gemcitabine synergistically increased the growth inhibition of PaCa cells through NF-ĸB inhibition. It also significantly improved the outcome of patients with advanced PaCa treated with erlotinib, an inhibitor of EGFR signaling, and gemcitabine (84). Genistein can overcome cancer drug resistance and inhibit cancer relapse and recurrence (85). Overall data suggest that genistein potentiates anticancer effects by promoting both apoptotic and autophagic cell death and inhibiting multiple signaling pathways in PaCa and PaCa-derived CSCs (86).

Curcumin. Curcumin (diferuloylmethane) is present in the rhizome of turmeric (Curcuma longa) (87, 88). Curcumin exerts anticarcinogenic, antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anti-inflammatory activities, has hepatoprotective and renoprotective properties, and has hypoglycemic effects. In preclinical studies using both in vitro and in vivo models, curcumin exhibited antiproliferative, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and pro-apoptotic effects, leading to antitumor effects in various cancer types, including thyroid, lung, and breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, and PaCa (89, 88). Moreover, curcumin inhibited the growth, migration, angiogenesis, invasion, and metastasis of PaCa cells by suppressing multiple cellular signaling pathways, such as AKT, NF-ĸB, and NOTCH (87). It was also found to inhibit the activity of distinct signaling pathways, including mTOR, HH, EGFR, STAT3, and multidrug transporters such as MDR-associated protein 5 (ABCC5). It modulates the expression levels of different oncogenic and tumor supressor microRNAs (90). In addition, curcumin has synergistic effects with gemcitabine (91). By modulating the activation of various transcription factors, curcumin regulates the expression of inflammatory enzymes, cytokines, adhesion molecules, and cell survival proteins (92). Curcumin also down-regulates cyclin D1, cyclin E, and mouse double minute 2 homolog (MDM2) and up-regulates p21, p27, and p53 (93).

Recent preclinical and clinical studies have demonstrated the antitumor and anti-angiogenic properties of curcumin (94). Curcumin enhanced the effects of 5-FU and oxaliplatin in mediating the growth inhibition of colon cancer cells by modulating EGFR and IGFR (95, 96). The efficacy of curcumin in the treatment of PaCa was also assessed: both phase I and II clinical trials have yielded promising results on the use of curcumin in PaCa therapy. More importantly, curcumin was safe and non-toxic, even at high doses, in clinical trials and preclinical models (97, 98). Overall, data from pre-clinical and clinical studies suggest that curcumin is a safe PaCa therapeutic agent due to its broad effects on PaCa cells, the tumor microenvironment, and pancreatic CSCs.

Resveratrol. Resveratrol (trans-3,5,4’-tri-hydroxystilbene) is a natural polyphenol that is mainly found in the skins of red grapes, red wine, berries, and peanuts (99-101). Resveratrol has received a great deal of attention as a cancer-chemopreventive agent. It has been demonstrated to have an antitumorigenic capacity by inducing growth inhibition, cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and changes in biomarker expression in more than 30 types of tumor cells, including those originating from the pancreas (100). Resveratrol inhibits cell growth and prevents metastasis in PaCa through the induction of mitochondrial dysfunction, cytochrome c release, caspase activation, and apoptosis (100). Resveratrol can suppress PaCa cell migration, invasion, and the progression of EMT through inhibition of the PI3K/AKT/NF-ĸB signaling pathway. It has been found to suppress the growth and self-renewal capacity of pancreatic CSCs derived from k-ras transgenic mice and human primary tumors. Therefore, the potential effect of resveratrol against CSCs needs to be further investigated, especially its effects on signaling pathways (102). Resveratrol has been shown to directly inhibit the proliferation and viability of human PaCa cells in vitro in a dose- and time-dependent manner (100, 101). Resveratrol treatment may thus be a novel therapeutic option for PaCa by inhibiting the HH signaling pathway (101).

Quercetin. Flavonoids are one of the most actively studied classes of molecules for their potential to prevent cancer. Quercetin, 3,3’,4’,5,7-pentahydroxylflavone, is a natural dietary polyphenol and flavonol-type flavonoid that is ubiquitously present in fruits and vegetables, such as broccoli, onions, tea, apples, and berries (103-105). It has been well-documented that quercetin is a potential anticancer agent in in vitro and in vivo models. Quercetin exerts its anticancer effect through the inhibition of several intracellular pathways in cancer cells, including PI3K/Akt/mTOR, glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3β), NF-ĸB, and heat-shock protein 70 (105, 106). It elicits antitumor effects by acting as an antioxidant; modulating signaling pathways; inducing apoptosis, autophagy, and cell cycle arrest; blocking cell migration protein kinase C inhibitory activity; and inhibiting the fatty acid synthesis required for de novo membrane synthesis (106-108). Quercetin also suppressed local and distant tumor growth and prolonged survival in murine PaCa models. Quercetin itself showed growth-inhibitory activity in both drug-sensitive and MDR1 cells. In addition, at a non-cytotoxic concentration, it enhanced the effect of chemotherapeutic drugs in MDR cells. Quercetin has also been shown to act as a chemosensitizer for ABC pump-proteins in MDR tumor cell lines. Furthermore, it interacts directly with transporter proteins to inhibit drug efflux, mediated by either MDR1, MRP1, or BCRP (109, 110). Quercetin also suppressed local and distant tumor growth and prolonged survival in murine PaCa models (104). Quercetin targets pancreatic CSCs by inhibiting the β-catenin signaling pathway (106). It reduced the self-renewal properties of CSCs and ALDH activity in PaCa (103, 107). More importantly, quercetin showed synergistic effects in eliminating pancreatic CSCs in vitro and in vivo when combined with sulforaphane (107). Quercetin may be an important modulator of cancer cell sensitivity to anticancer chemotherapeutic agents (106-108). Quercetin 3-O-glucoside and gemcitabine co-treatment was found to have an additive or synergistic anti-migratory effect on human PaCa cells, suggesting that this drug combination may reduce the risk of side-effects (111).

EGCG. As the most abundant catechin found in green tea and recognized for its potent chemopreventive properties, EGCG induces growth inhibition and apoptosis of various PaCa cell lines. In vivo studies have also demonstrated the inhibitory effect of green tea on tumorigenesis in nitrosamine-induced pancreatic tumors (112). EGCG inhibits angiogenesis, possibly through the inhibition of proangiogenic factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor (113). It has been found to be most effective against cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. EGCG has been shown to inhibit NF-ĸB activity, the MAPK pathway, activator protein-1 activity, and EGFR-mediated downstream signaling pathways. The antiproliferative effects of EGCG on PaCa cell growth in vitro are potentiated by treatment with pterostilbene (114).

Lycopene. One of the most extensively studied carotenoids in tomatoes, lycopene, possesses potent antioxidant activity due to its extended conjugated hydrocarbon chain. Lycopene is a acyclic isomer of β-carotene; it is synthesized by plants and microorganisms, not animals, and is a natural pigment. Lycopene has been shown to prevent carcinogenesis. Lycopene induces apoptosis and inhibits cell-cycle progression in various cancer cells, and its efficacy against xenograft tumors has been reported in a number of in vivo studies (115).

Propolis and caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE). Propolis, a sticky hive product collected by bees from various plant sources, is known to have pharmacological activity, including anticancer, antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects (116,117). Bioactive components from propolis such as CAPE have been studied and shown to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties that involve the inhibition of enzyme activities, such as the activation of xanthine oxidase, cyclo-oxygenase, and transcriptional factor NF-ĸB. CAPE inhibits EMT in PaCa and is a potent apoptosis-inducing agent (118). Its antiproliferative activity may involve the induction of mitochondrial dysfunction and the activation of caspase-3/caspase-7 (119). CAPE induces apoptosis after autophagy inhibition in a caspase-dependent and a caspase-independent manner in PaCa cells (120). Coral et al. investigated the effect of CAPE on breast CSCs derived from aggressive triple-negative breast cancer cells and showed CAPE has effects on CSC self-renewal, progenitor formation, CD44 cell marker phenotype, cell cycle, and apoptosis (121). Their results strongly suggest that CSCs are induced into a less malignant state after CAPE treatment and may terminally differentiate their progeny, making them more susceptible to chemotherapy.

Future Perspective and Conclusion

In addition to providing an elegant model of carcinogenesis, the CSC concept has important clinical implications since targeted therapies that eliminate CSCs offer the potential to improve therapy, maintain remission, or lead to a complete cure. Emerging evidence shows that CSC-targeted therapies are effective in a preclinical setting, with a marked survival benefit. Although further studies are needed to strengthen these fondlings, CSCs seem a powerful target for more effective therapies in cancer. Regarding implementing all of the information generated by the preclinical studies, a practical approach to clinical translational may involve systems biology and bioinformatics approach to pinpoint signal hubs, molecular mediators and cross-roads that are commom to all of the molecular signaling pathways required for CSC survival and maintaince indicated by the preclinical studies. These studies could provide a foundation for rationally designed molecularly therapies targeting CSCs. To succeed, future studies should focus on the identification of i) CSC-specific pathways that can be pharmacologically targeted, ii) CSC-specific surface markers for antibody therapy, iii) gene silencing approaches by siRNA or miRNAs, and iv) natural products that promote the differentiation of CSCs into progenitors that do not self-renew or that differentiate only into normal tissue cells (summarized in Table I) (17). Although CSCs represent a very intriguing target for therapy, the CSC concept still leads to many unanswered questions. A major future goal is to address the question of clonal evolution, particularly a monitoring of CSCs during cancer development and after treatment. While CSCs may be an important target for therapy, it remains to be determined whether targeting them is the best way to neutralize their ability to progress, expand, and resist treatment in the host environment (122).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Summary of compounds that have an effect on cancer stem cells.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Received April 3, 2017.
  • Revision received April 19, 2017.
  • Accepted April 21, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    American Cancer Society Pancreatic Cancer overview. https://www.cancer.org/cancer/pancreatic-cancer.
  2. ↵
    1. Hajj C,
    2. Goodman K
    : Pancreatic cancer and SBRT: A new potential option? Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 20(5): 377-384, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Pancreatic Cancer Action Network
    . https://www.pancan.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/2016-GAA-PC-Facts.pdf.
  3. ↵
    1. Fitzgerald T,
    2. McCubrey J
    : Pancreatic cancer stem cells: Association with cell surface markers, prognosis, resistance, metastasis and treatment. Adv Biol Reg 56: 45-50, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Ashour A,
    2. Gurbuz N,
    3. Alpay S,
    4. Aziz A,
    5. Mansour A,
    6. Huo L,
    7. Ozpolat B
    : Elongation factor-2 kinase regulates TG2/b1 integrin/Src/uPAR pathway and epithelial–mesenchymal transition mediating pancreatic cancer cells invasion. J Cell Mol Med 18(11): 2235-2251, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Ashour A,
    2. Alpay S,
    3. Aziz A,
    4. Mansour A,
    5. Huo L,
    6. Ozpolat B
    : Targeting elongation factor-2 kinase (eEF-2K) induces apoptosis in human pancreatic cancer cells. Apoptosis 19(1): 241-258, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Hingorani SR,
    2. Wang L,
    3. Multani AS,
    4. Combs C,
    5. Deramaudt TB,
    6. Hruban RH,
    7. Rustgi AK,
    8. Chang S,
    9. Tuveson DA
    : Trp53R172H and KrasG12D cooperate to promote chromosomal instability and widely metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in mice. Cancer Cell 7(5): 469-483, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Feldmann G,
    2. Beaty R,
    3. Hruban RH,
    4. Maitra A
    : Molecular genetics of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14(3): 224-232, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bardeesy N,
    2. Aguirre AJ,
    3. Chu GC,
    4. Cheng KH,
    5. Lopez LV,
    6. Hezel AF,
    7. Feng B,
    8. Brennan C,
    9. Weissleder R,
    10. Mahmood U,
    11. Hanahan D,
    12. Redston MS,
    13. Chin L,
    14. Depinho RA
    : Both p16(Ink4a) and the p19(Arf)-p53 pathway constrain progression of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci 103(15): 5947-5952, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Hezel AF,
    2. Kimmelman AC,
    3. Stanger BZ,
    4. Bardesssy N,
    5. Depinho RA
    : Genetics and biology of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Genes Dev 20(10): 1218-1249, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Wood LD
    : Pancreatic cancer genomes: toward molecular subtyping and novel approaches to diagnosis and therapy. Mol Diagn Ther 17(5): 287-297, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Gnoni A,
    2. Licchetta A,
    3. Scarpa A,
    4. Azzariti A,
    5. Brunetti AE,
    6. Simone G,
    7. Nardulli P,
    8. Santini D,
    9. Aieta M,
    10. Delcuratolo S,
    11. Silvertes N
    : Carcinogenesis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: precursor lesions. Int J Mol Sci 14(10): 19731-19762, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wolfgang CL,
    2. Herman JM,
    3. Laheru DA,
    4. Klein AP,
    5. Erdek MA,
    6. Fishman EK,
    7. Hruban RH
    : Recent progress in pancreatic cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 63(5): 318-348, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Qiu H,
    2. Fang X,
    3. Luo Q,
    4. Ouyang G
    : Cancer stem cells: a potential target for cancer therapy. Cell Mol Life Sci 72(18): 1920-1924, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Passegué E,
    2. Jamieson CH,
    3. Ailles LE,
    4. Weissman IL
    : Normal and leukemic hematopoiesis: Are leukemias a stem cell disorder or a reacquisition of stem cell characteristics? Proc Natl Acad Sci 100: 11842-11849, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Spangrude GJ,
    2. Heimfeld S,
    3. Weissman IL
    : Purification and characterization of mouse hematopoietic stem cells. Science 241(4861): 58-62, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  16. ↵
    1. Tan BT,
    2. Park CY,
    3. Ailles LE,
    4. Weissman I
    : The cancer stem cell hypothesis: a work in progress. Lab Invest 86(12): 1203-1207, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Bao Q,
    2. Zhao Y,
    3. Renner A,
    4. Niess H,
    5. Seeliger H,
    6. Jauch KW,
    7. Bruns C
    : Cancer Stem Cells in Pancreatic Cancer. Cancers 2(3): 1629-1641, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Rao C,
    2. Mohammed A
    : New insights into pancreatic cancer stem cells. World J Stem Cell 7(3): 547-555, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    1. Walter D,
    2. Satheesha S,
    3. Albrecht P,
    4. Bornhauser BC,
    5. D'Alessandro V,
    6. Oesch SM,
    7. Rehrauer H,
    8. Leuschner I,
    9. Koscielniak E,
    10. Gengler C,
    11. Moch H,
    12. Bernasconi M,
    13. Niggli FK,
    14. Schafer BW
    : CD133-positive embryonal rhabdomyo-sarcoma stem-like cell population is enriched in rhabdospheres. PLoS ONE 6(5): e19506, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Zheng H,
    2. Ying H,
    3. Yan H,
    4. Kimmelman AC,
    5. Hiller DJ,
    6. Chen AJ,
    7. Perry SR,
    8. Tonon G,
    9. Chu GC,
    10. Ding Z,
    11. Stommel JM,
    12. Dunn KL,
    13. Wiedemeyer R,
    14. You MJ,
    15. Brennan C,
    16. Wang YA,
    17. Ligon KL,
    18. Wong WH,
    19. Chin L,
    20. DePinho RA
    : p53 and PTEN control neural and glioma stem/progenitor cell renewal and differentiation. Nature 455(7216): 1129-1133, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Wang HC,
    2. Hou YC,
    3. Shan YS
    : Advances in pancreatic cancer stem cells, tumor-associated macrophages, and their interplay. Cancer Cell Microenv 1: e304, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  22. ↵
    1. Gros P,
    2. Ben Neriah YB,
    3. Croop JM,
    4. Housman DE
    : Isolation and expression of a complementary DNA that confers multidrug resistance. Nature 323(6090): 728-731, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Donnenberg VS,
    2. Donnenberg AD
    : Multiple drug resistance in cancer revisited: the cancer stem cell hypothesis. J Clin Pharmacol 45(8): 872-877, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Yang T,
    2. Rycaj K
    : Targeted therapy against cancer stem cells. Oncol Lett 10(1): 27-33, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Bao B,
    2. Ahmad A,
    3. Azmi S,
    4. Ali S,
    5. Sarkar F
    : Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) and mechanisms of their regulation: implications for cancer therapy. Curr Protoc Pharmacol 14: 14-25, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Hermann PC,
    2. Huber SL,
    3. Herrler T,
    4. Aicher A,
    5. Ellwart JW,
    6. Guba M
    : Distinct populations of cancer stem cells determine tumor growth and metastatic activity in human pancreatic cancer. Cell Stem Cell 1: 313-323, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hong SP,
    2. Wen J,
    3. Bang S,
    4. Park S,
    5. Song SY
    : CD44-positive cells are responsible for gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer cells. Int J. Cancer 25: 2323-2331, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Mizuma M,
    2. Rasheed ZA,
    3. Yabuuchi S,
    4. Omura N,
    5. Campbell NR,
    6. de Wilde RF,
    7. De Oliveira E,
    8. Zhang Q,
    9. Puig O,
    10. Matsui W,
    11. Hidalgo M,
    12. Maitra A,
    13. Rajeshkumar NV
    : The gamma secretase inhibitor MRK-003 attenuates pancreatic cancer growth in preclinical models. Mol Cancer Ther 1(9): 1999-2009, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    1. Abel EV,
    2. Kim EJ,
    3. Wu J,
    4. Hynes M,
    5. Bednar F,
    6. Proctor E,
    7. Wang L,
    8. Dziubinski ML,
    9. Simeone DM
    : The NOTCH pathway is important in maintaining the cancer stem cell population in pancreatic cancer. PLOS One 9(3): e91983, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Lei J,
    2. Ma J,
    3. Ma Q,
    4. Li X,
    5. Liu H,
    6. Xu Q,
    7. Duan W,
    8. Sun Q,
    9. Xu J,
    10. Wu Z,
    11. Wu E
    : Hedgehog signaling regulates hypoxia induced epithelial to mesenchymal transition and invasion in pancreatic cancer cells via a ligand-independent manner. Mol Cancer 2(66): 1476-4598, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    1. Wang Y,
    2. Zhou BP
    : Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer progression and metastasis. Chin J Cancer 30(9): 603-611, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Cui J,
    2. Jiang W,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Wang L,
    5. Xie K
    : Role of Wnt/β-catenin signaling in drug resistance of pancreatic cancer. Curr Pharm Des 18(17): 2464-2471, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Shigeta J,
    2. Katayama K,
    3. Mitsuhashi J,
    4. Noguchi K,
    5. Sugimoto Y
    : BCRP/ABCG2 confers anticancer drug resistance without covalent dimerization. Cancer Sci 101(8): 1813-1821, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Dean M
    : ABC Transporters, drug resistance, and cancer stem cells. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 14(1): 3-9, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Vinogradov S,
    2. Wei X
    : Cancer stem cells and drug resistance: the potential of nanomedicine. Nanomedicine 7(4): 1-18, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Skrypek N,
    2. Vasseur R,
    3. Vincent A,
    4. Duchêne B,
    5. Seuningen I,
    6. Jonckheere N
    : The oncogenic receptor ErbB2 modulates gemcitabine and irinotecan/SN-38 chemoresistance of human pancreatic cancer cells via hCNT1 transporter and multidrug-resistance associated protein MRP-2. Oncotarget 16(3): 10853-10867, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    1. Pang L,
    2. Word B,
    3. Xu J,
    4. Wang H,
    5. Hammons G,
    6. Huang S,
    7. Cook B
    : ATP-Binding cassette genes genotype and expression: a potential association with pancreatic cancer development and chemoresistance. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2014: 414931, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Bae YH,
    2. Park K
    : Targeted drug delivery to tumors: myth, reality and possibility. J Control Release 53(3): 198-205, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  39. ↵
    1. Yang C,
    2. Jin K,
    3. Tong Y,
    4. Chi Cho W
    : Therapeutic potential of cancer stem cells. Med Oncol 32:(6): 619, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Luo G,
    2. Long J,
    3. Cui X,
    4. Xiao Z,
    5. Liu Z,
    6. Shi S,
    7. Liu L,
    8. Liu C,
    9. Xu J,
    10. Li M,
    11. Yu X
    : Highly lymphatic metastatic pancreatic cancer cells possess stem cell-like properties. Int J Oncol 2(3): 979-984, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  41. ↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Heidt DG,
    3. Dalerba P,
    4. Burant CF,
    5. Zhang L,
    6. Adsay V,
    7. Wicha M,
    8. Clarke MF,
    9. Simeone DM
    : Identification of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Cancer Res 7(3): 1030-1037, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  42. ↵
    1. Abel EV,
    2. Simeone DM
    : Biology and clinical applications of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Gastroenterology 44(6): 1241-1248, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  43. ↵
    1. Yang M,
    2. Wang HC,
    3. Hou YC,
    4. Tung HL,
    5. Chiu TJ,
    6. Shan YS
    : Blockade of autophagy reduces pancreatic cancer stem cell activity and potentiates the tumoricidal effect of gemcitabine. Mol Cancer 4: 179, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  44. ↵
    1. Suzuki S,
    2. Okada M,
    3. Shibuya K,
    4. Seino M,
    5. Sato A,
    6. Takeda H,
    7. Seino S,
    8. Yoshioka T,
    9. Kitanaka C
    : JNK suppression of chemotherapeutic agents-induced ROS confers chemoresistance on pancreatic cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 6(1): 458-470, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  45. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Fan P,
    4. Bauer N,
    5. Gladkich J,
    6. Ryschich E,
    7. Hinz U,
    8. Fortunato F,
    9. Herr I
    : Aspirin counteracts cancer stem cell features, desmoplasia and gemcitabine resistance in pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 6(12): 9999-10015, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Karthik GM,
    2. Ma R,
    3. Lövrot J,
    4. Kis LL,
    5. Lindh C,
    6. Blomquist L,
    7. Fredriksson I,
    8. Bergh J,
    9. Hartman J
    : mTOR inhibitors counteract tamoxifen-induced activation of breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Lett 67(1): 76-87, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  47. ↵
    1. Zeng JY,
    2. Sharma S,
    3. Zhou YQ,
    4. Yao HP,
    5. Hu X,
    6. Zhang R,
    7. Wang MH
    : Synergistic activities of MET/RON inhibitor BMS-777607 and mTOR inhibitor AZD8055 to polyploid cells derived from pancreatic cancer and cancer stem cells. Mol Cancer Ther 13(1): 37-48, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Matsubara S
    : mTOR plays critical roles in pancreatic cancer stem cells through specific and stemness-related functions. Sci 3: 3230, 2013.
    OpenUrl
    1. Francipane MG,
    2. Lagasse E
    : Therapeutic potential of mTOR inhibitors for targeting cancer stem cells. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2(5): 1180-1188, 2015.
    OpenUrl
    1. Mueller MT,
    2. Hermann PC,
    3. Witthauer J,
    4. Rubio-Viqueira B,
    5. Leicht SF,
    6. Huber S,
    7. Ellwart JW,
    8. Mustafa M,
    9. Bartenstein P,
    10. D'Haese JG,
    11. Schoenberg MH,
    12. Berger F,
    13. Jauch KW,
    14. Hidalgo M,
    15. Heeschen C
    : Combined targeted treatment to eliminate tumorigenic cancer stem cells in human pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterology 37(3): 1102-1113, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  49. ↵
    1. Melnik BC,
    2. Schmitz G
    : Metformin: An inhibitor of mTORC1 signaling. J Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 2(2): 1029, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  50. ↵
    1. Mohammed A,
    2. Janakiram N,
    3. Brewer M,
    4. Ritchie R,
    5. Marya A,
    6. Lightfoot S,
    7. Steele V,
    8. Rao C
    : Antidiabetic drug metformin prevents progresion of pancreatic cancer by targeting in part cancer stem cells and mTOR signaling. Translat Oncol 6(6): 649-659, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  51. ↵
    1. Chun SG,
    2. Zhou W,
    3. Yee NS
    : Combined targeting of histone deacetylases and Hedgehog signaling enhances cytotoxicity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Biol 8(14): 1328-1339, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  52. ↵
    1. Bao B,
    2. Azmi A,
    3. Ali S,
    4. Zaiem F,
    5. Sarkar F
    : Metformin may function as anti-cancer agent via targeting cancer stem cells: the potential biological significance of tumorassociated miRNAs in breast and pancreatic cancers. Ann Transl Med 2(6): 59, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Shibuya K,
    2. Okada M,
    3. Suzuki S,
    4. Seino M,
    5. Seino S,
    6. Takeda H,
    7. Kitanaka C
    : Targeting the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT1 inhibits the self-renewal and tumor-initiating capacity of cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 6(2): 651-661, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  54. ↵
    1. Naujokat C,
    2. Steinhart R
    : Salinomycin as a drug for targeting human cancer stem cells. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012: 950658, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Riccioni R,
    2. Dupuis ML,
    3. Bernabei M
    : The cancer stem cell selective inhibitor salinomycin is a P-glycoprotein inhibitör: Blood Cells Mol Dis 5(1): 86-92, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  56. ↵
    1. Vaz Arokia P,
    2. Ponnusamy M,
    3. Seshacharyulu P,
    4. Batra S
    : A concise review on the current understanding of pancreatic cancer stem cells. J Cancer Stem Cell Res e: 1004, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Rausch V,
    2. Liu L,
    3. Kallifatidis G
    : Synergistic activity of sorafenib and sulforaphane abolishes pancreatic cancer stem cell characteristics. Cancer Res 70: 5004-5013, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Herr I,
    2. Buchler MW
    : Dietary constituents of broccoli and other cruciferous vegetables: implications for prevention and therapy of cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 6(5): 377-383, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  59. ↵
    1. Qin S,
    2. Deng Y,
    3. Li J,
    4. Zhang Z
    : A bioengineered murine model using CD24+CD44+ pancreatic cancer stem cells for chemotherapy study. Biomed Mater 10(1): 015004, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Sai S,
    2. Wakai T,
    3. Vares G,
    4. Yamada S,
    5. Kamijo T,
    6. Kamada T,
    7. Shirai T
    : Combination of carbon ion beam and gemcitabine causes irreparable DNA damage and death of radioresistant pancreatic cancer stem-like cells in vitro and in vivo. Oncotarget 6(8): 5517-5535, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Burkhart C,
    2. Fleyshman D,
    3. Kohrn R,
    4. Commane M,
    5. Garrigan J,
    6. Toshkov I,
    7. Gurova K
    : Curaxin CBL0137 eradicates drug-resistant cancer stem cells and potentiates efficacy of gemcitabine in preclinical models of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget 5(22): 11038-11053, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Urtasun N,
    2. Vidal-Pla A,
    3. Mazo A
    : Human pancreatic cancer stem cells are sensitive to dual inhibition of IGF-IR and ERBB receptors. BMC Cancer 15: 223, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Xue Z-X,
    2. Zheng J-H,
    3. Zheng Z-Q,
    4. Cai J-L,
    5. Ye X-H,
    6. Wang C,
    7. Sun W-J,
    8. Zhou X,
    9. Lu M-D,
    10. Li P-H,
    11. Cai Z-Z
    : Latexin inhibits the proliferation of CD133+ miapaca-2 pancreatic cancer stem-like cells. World J Surg Oncol 12: 404, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Halkova T,
    2. Cuperkova R,
    3. Minarik M,
    4. Benesova L
    : MicroRNAs in pancreatic cancer: involvement in carcinogenesis and potential use for diagnosis and prognosis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2015: 892903, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Ma C,
    2. Huang T,
    3. Ding YC,
    4. Yu W,
    5. Wang Q,
    6. Meng B,
    7. Luo SX
    : microRNA-200c overexpression inhibits chemoresistance, invasion and colony formation of human pancreatic cancer stem cells. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 8(6): 6533-6539, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Jiang J,
    2. Li Z,
    3. Yu C,
    4. Chen M,
    5. Tian S,
    6. Sun C
    : MiR-1181 inhibits stem cell-like phenotypes and suppresses SOX2 and STAT3 in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett 356(2 Pt B): 962-970, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Zhao Y,
    2. Zhao L,
    3. Ischenko I,
    4. Bao Q,
    5. Schwarz B,
    6. Bruns C,
    7. Camaj P
    : Antisense inhibition of microRNA-21 and microRNA-221 in tumor-initiating stem-like cells modulates tumorigenesis, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance in pancreatic cancer. Targ Oncol 10(4): 535-548, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  68. ↵
    1. Cioffi M,
    2. Trabulo SM,
    3. Sanchez-Ripoll Y,
    4. Miranda-Lorenzo I,
    5. Lonardo E,
    6. Dorado J,
    7. Reis Vieira C,
    8. Ramirez JC,
    9. Hidalgo M,
    10. Aicher A,
    11. Hahn S,
    12. Sainz B Jr..,
    13. Heeschen C
    : The miR-17-92 cluster counteracts quiescence and chemoresistance in a distinct subpopulation of pancreatic cancer stem cells. Pancreas 4(12): 1936-1948, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Shao Y,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Cui L,
    4. Lou W,
    5. Wang D,
    6. Lu W
    : LIN28B suppresses microRNA let-7b expression to promote CD44+/LIN28B+ human pancreatic cancer stem cell proliferation and invasion. Am J Cancer Res 5(9): 2643-2659, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. ↵
    1. Hasegawa S,
    2. Eguchi H,
    3. Nagano H,
    4. Konno M,
    5. Tomimaru Y,
    6. Wada H,
    7. Hama N,
    8. Kawamoto K,
    9. Kobayashi S,
    10. Nishida N,
    11. Koseki J,
    12. Nishimura T,
    13. Gotoh N,
    14. Ohno S,
    15. Yabuta N,
    16. Nojima H,
    17. Mori M,
    18. Doki Y,
    19. Ishii H
    : MicroRNA-1246 expression associated with CCNG2-mediated chemoresistance and stemness in pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 11(8): 1572-1580, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Gao L,
    2. Yang Y,
    3. Xu H,
    4. Liu R,
    5. Li D,
    6. Hong H,
    7. Qin M,
    8. Wang Y
    : miR-335 functions as a tumor suppressor in pancreatic cancer by targeting OCT4. Tumor Biol 5(8): 8309-8318, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Karlitepe A,
    2. Ozalp O,
    3. Avci CB
    : New approaches for cancer immunotherapy. Tumor Biol 36(6): 4075-4078, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  73. ↵
    1. Zhu Y,
    2. Karakhanova S,
    3. Huang X,
    4. Deng S,
    5. Werner J,
    6. Bazhin A
    : Influence of interferon-α on the expression of the cancer stem cell markers in pancreatic carcinoma cells. Science Direct 324(2): 146-156, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  74. ↵
    1. Umebayashi M,
    2. Kiyota A,
    3. Koya N,
    4. Katano M,
    5. Morisaki T
    : An epithelial cell adhesion molecule- and CD3-bispecific antibody plus activated T-cells can eradicate chemoresistant cancer stem-like pancreatic carcinoma cells in vitro. Anticancer Res 34(8): 4509-4520, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. ↵
    1. Lin M,
    2. Yuan YY,
    3. Liu SP,
    4. Shi JJ,
    5. Long XA,
    6. Niu LZ,
    7. Chen JB,
    8. Li Q,
    9. Xu KC
    : Prospective study of the safety and efficacy of a pancreatic cancer stem cell vaccine. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 41(10): 1827-1833, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  76. ↵
    1. Yin T,
    2. Shi P,
    3. Gou S,
    4. Shen Q,
    5. Wang C
    : Dendritic cells loaded with pancreatic cancer stem cells (CSCs) lysates induce antitumor immune killing effect in vitro. Plos One 9(12): e114581, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Li Y,
    2. Wicha M,
    3. Schwartz S,
    4. Sun D
    : Implications of cancer stem cell theory for cancer chemoprevention by natural dietary compounds. J Nutr Biochem 22(9): 799-806, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Suzuki R,
    2. Kang Y,
    3. Li X,
    4. Roife D,
    5. Zhang R,
    6. Fleming J
    : Genistein potentiates the antitumor effect of 5-fluorouracil by inducing apoptosis and autophagy in human pancreatic cancer cells. Anticancer Res 34(9): 4685-4692, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  79. ↵
    1. Ma J,
    2. Cheng L,
    3. Liu H,
    4. Sarkar F,
    5. Xia J,
    6. Wang Z
    : Genistein down-regulates mir-223 expression in pancreatic cancer cells. Current Drug Targets 14(10): 1150-1156, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. El-Rayes B,
    2. Ali S,
    3. Ali I,
    4. Philip P,
    5. Abbruzzese J,
    6. Sarkar F
    : Potentiation of the effect of erlotinib by genistein in pancreatic cancer: The Role of AKT and nuclear factor-ĸB. Cancer Res 66(21): 10553-10559, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Banerjee S,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Ali S,
    4. Bhuiyan M,
    5. Wang Z,
    6. Chiao PJ,
    7. Philip PA,
    8. Abbruzzese J,
    9. Sarkar FH
    : Molecular evidence for increased antitumor activity of gemcitabine by genistein in vitro and in vivo using an orthotopic model of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 5: 9064-9072, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  82. ↵
    1. Han L,
    2. Zhang HW,
    3. Zhou WP,
    4. Chen GM,
    5. Guo KJ
    : The effects of genistein on transforming growth factor-β1-induced invasion and metastasis in human pancreatic cancer cell line Panc-1 in vitro. Chin Med 125(11): 2032-2040, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  83. ↵
    1. El-Rayes B,
    2. Philip P,
    3. Sarkar F,
    4. Shields A,
    5. Wolff R,
    6. Abbruzzese J
    : A phase II study of isoflavones, erlotinib, and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Invest New Drugs 29(4): 694-699, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Bimonte S,
    2. Barbieri A,
    3. Palma G,
    4. Luciano A,
    5. Rea D,
    6. Arra C
    : Curcumin inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in an orthotopic mouse model of human pancreatic cancer. BioMed Res Intl 2013: 810423, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Ma J,
    2. Fang B,
    3. Zeng F,
    4. Pang H,
    5. Ma C,
    6. Xia J,
    7. Wang Z
    : Curcumin inhibits cell growth and invasion through up-regulation of miR-7 in pancreatic cancer cells. Toxicol Lett 31(1): 82-91, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  86. ↵
    1. Osterman CJ,
    2. Lynch J,
    3. Leaf P,
    4. Gonda A,
    5. Ferguson Bennit HR,
    6. Griffiths D,
    7. Wall NR
    : Curcumin modulates pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell-derived exosomal function. Plos One 10(7): e0132845, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Tsai C,
    2. Hsieh T,
    3. Lee J,
    4. Hsu C,
    5. Chiu C,
    6. Tsai E,
    7. Kuo P
    : Curcumin suppresses phthalate-induced metastasis and the proportion of cancer stem cell (CSC)-like cells via the inhibition of AhR/ERK/SK1 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Agric Food Chem 63(48): 10388-10398, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  88. ↵
    1. Devassy J,
    2. Nwachukwu I,
    3. Jones PJ
    : Curcumin and cancer: barriers to obtaining a health claim. Nutrit Rev 73(3): 155-165, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Subramaniam D,
    2. Ramalingam S,
    3. Houchen C.W,
    4. Anant S
    : Cancer stem cells: a novel paradigm for cancer prevention and treatment. Mini Rev Med Chem 10(5): 359-371, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Osterman C,
    2. Gonda A,
    3. Stiff T,
    4. Moyron R,
    5. Wall N
    : Curcumin induces pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell death via reduction of the inhibitors of apoptosis. Pancreas 45(1): 101-109, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Kesharwani P,
    2. Banerjee S,
    3. Padhye S,
    4. Sarkar F,
    5. Iyer A
    : Parenterally administrable nano-micelles of 3,4-difluorobenzyli-denecurcumin for treating pancreatic cancer. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 132: 138-145, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  92. ↵
    1. Goel A,
    2. Kunnumakkara AB,
    3. Aggarwal BB
    : Curcumin as “Curcumin”: from kitchen to clinic. Biochem Pharmacol 75(4): 787-809, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Thangapazham RL,
    2. Sharma A,
    3. Maheshwari RK
    : Multiple molecular targets in cancer chemoprevention by curcumin. AAPS J E: 443(9): 443-E449, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Patel BB,
    2. Sengupta R,
    3. Qazi S,
    4. Vachhani H,
    5. Yu Y,
    6. Rishi AK,
    7. Majumdar AP
    : Curcumin enhances the effects of 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin in mediating growth inhibition of colon cancer cells by modulating EGFR and IGF-1R. Int J Cancer 122(2): 267-273, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  95. ↵
    1. Kakarala M,
    2. Brenner DE,
    3. Korkaya H,
    4. Cheng C,
    5. Tazi K,
    6. Ginestier C,
    7. Liu S,
    8. Dontu G,
    9. Wicha MS
    : Targeting breast stem cells with the cancer preventive compounds curcumin and piperine. Breast Cancer Res Treat 112(3): 777-785, 2009.
    OpenUrl
  96. ↵
    1. Liu P,
    2. Liang H,
    3. Xia Q,
    4. Li P,
    5. Kong H,
    6. Lei P,
    7. Wang S,
    8. Tu Z
    : Resveratrol induces apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells by inhibiting miR-21 regulation of BCL-2 expression. Clin Transl Oncol 15(9): 741-746, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Xu Q,
    2. Zong L,
    3. Chen X,
    4. Jiang Z,
    5. Nan L,
    6. Li J,
    7. Duan W,
    8. Lei J,
    9. Zhang L,
    10. Ma J,
    11. Li X,
    12. Wang Z,
    13. Wu Z,
    14. Ma Q,
    15. Ma Z
    : Resveratrol in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Ann NY Acad Sci 348(1): 10-19, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  98. ↵
    1. Qin Y,
    2. Ma Z,
    3. Dang X,
    4. Li W,
    5. Ma Q
    : Effect of resveratrol on proliferation and apoptosis of human pancreatic cancer MIA PaCa-2 cells may involve inhibition of the Hedgehog signaling pathway. Mol Med Rep 10(5): 2563-2567, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Li W,
    2. Ma J,
    3. Ma Q,
    4. Li B,
    5. Han L,
    6. Liu J,
    7. Xu Q,
    8. Duan W,
    9. Yu S,
    10. Wang F,
    11. Wu E
    : Resveratrol inhibits the epithelial-mesenchymal transition of pancreatic cancer cells via suppression of the PI-3K/Akt/NF-ĸB pathway. Curr Med Chem 20(33): 4185-4194, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Appari M,
    2. Babu K,
    3. Gross W,
    4. Herr I
    : Sulforaphane, quercetin and catechins complement each other in elimination of advanced pancreatic cancer by miR-let-7 induction and K-ras inhibition. Int J Oncol 45(4): 1391-1400, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  101. ↵
    1. Angst E,
    2. Park JL,
    3. Moro A,
    4. Lu QY,
    5. Lu X,
    6. Li G,
    7. King J,
    8. Chen M,
    9. Reber HA,
    10. Go VL,
    11. Eibl G,
    12. Hines OJ
    : The flavonoid quercetin inhibits pancreatic cancer growth in vitro and in vivo. Pancreas 2(2): 223-229, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  102. ↵
    1. Zhou W,
    2. Kallifatidis G,
    3. Baumann B,
    4. Rausch V,
    5. Mattern J,
    6. Gladkich J,
    7. Giese N,
    8. Moldenhauer G,
    9. Wirth T,
    10. Büchler MW,
    11. Salnikov AV,
    12. Herr I
    : Dietary polyphenol quercetin targets pancreatic cancer stem cell. Int J Oncol 37(3): 551-561, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Jung JH,
    2. Lee JO,
    3. Kim JH,
    4. Lee SK,
    5. You GY,
    6. Park SH,
    7. Park JM,
    8. Kim EK,
    9. Suh PG,
    10. An JK,
    11. Kim HS
    : Quercetin suppresses HeLa cell viability via AMPK-induced HSP70 and EGFR down-regulation. J Cell Physiol 23(2): 408-414, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  104. ↵
    1. Nishiumi S,
    2. Miyamoto S,
    3. Kawabata K,
    4. Ohnishi K,
    5. Mukai R,
    6. Murakami A,
    7. Ashida H,
    8. Terao J
    : aDietary flavonoids as cancer-preventive and therapeutic biofactors. Front Biosci 3: 1332-1362, 2011.
    OpenUrl
  105. ↵
    1. Cao C,
    2. Sun L,
    3. Mo W,
    4. Luo J,
    5. Yang Z,
    6. Ran Y
    : Quercetin mediates β-catenin in pancreatic cancer stem-like cells. Pancreas 44(8): 1334-1339, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  106. ↵
    1. Chen C,
    2. Zhou J,
    3. Ji C
    : Quercetin: A potential drug to reverse multidrug resistance. Life Sci 11(87): 333-338, 2010.
    OpenUrl
  107. ↵
    1. Limptrakul P,
    2. Khantamat O,
    3. Pintha K
    : Inhibition of P-glycoprotein function and expression by kaempferol and quercetin. J Chemoter 17(1): 86-95, 2005.
    OpenUrl
  108. ↵
    1. Lee J,
    2. Han S,
    3. Yun J,
    4. Kim J
    : Quercetin 3-O-glucoside suppresses epidermal growth factor–induced migration by inhibiting EGFR signaling in pancreatic cancer cells. Tumor Biol 36(12): 9385-9393, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  109. ↵
    1. Lu Qi,
    2. Zhang L,
    3. Yee J,
    4. Go VL,
    5. Lee W
    : Metabolic Consequences of LDHA inhibition by epigallocatechin gallate and oxamate in MIA PaCa-2 pancreatic cancer cells. Metabolomics 11(1): 71-80, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Bimonte S,
    2. Leongito M,
    3. Barbieri A,
    4. Vecchio V,
    5. Barbieri M,
    6. Albino V,
    7. Piccirillo M,
    8. Amore A,
    9. Di Giacomo R,
    10. Nasto A,
    11. Granata V,
    12. Petrillo A,
    13. Arra C,
    14. Izzo F
    : Inhibitory effect of (−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate and bleomycin on human pancreatic cancer Mia Paca-2 cell growth. Infect Agents Cancer 10: 22, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  111. ↵
    1. Kostin S,
    2. McDonald D,
    3. McFadden D
    : Inhibitory effects of epigallocatechin-3-gallate and pterostilbene on pancreatic cancer growth in vitro. J Surg Res 77(2): 255-262, 2012.
    OpenUrl
  112. ↵
    1. Rao V,
    2. Agarwal S
    : Role of antioxidant lycopene in cancer and heart disease. J Am Coll Nutrit 19(5): 563-569, 2000.
    OpenUrl
  113. ↵
    1. Li F,
    2. Awale S,
    3. Tezuka Y,
    4. Esumi H,
    5. Kadota S
    : Study on the constituents of mexican propolis and their cytotoxic activity against PANC-1 human pancreatic cancer cells. J Nat Prod 73(4): 623-627, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Sawicka D,
    2. Car H,
    3. Borawska M,
    4. Nikliński J
    : The anticancer activity of propolis. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 50(1): 25-37, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Chen MJ,
    2. Shih SC,
    3. Wang HY,
    4. Lin CC,
    5. Liu CY,
    6. Wang TE,
    7. Chu CH,
    8. Chen YJ
    : Caffeic acid phenethyl ester inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition of human pancreatic cancer cells. Evid-Based Complement Altern Med 2013: 270906, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Papademetrio DL,
    2. Lompardía SL,
    3. Simunovich T,
    4. Costantino S,
    5. Mihalez CY,
    6. Cavaliere V,
    7. Álvarez É
    : Inhibition of survival pathways MAPK and NF-kB triggers apoptosis in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells via suppression of autophagy. Targ Oncol 1(2): 183-195, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  117. ↵
    1. Rzepecka-Stojko A,
    2. Kabała-Dzik A,
    3. Moździerz A,
    4. Kubina R,
    5. Wojtyczka RD,
    6. Stojko R,
    7. Dziedzic A,
    8. Jastrzębska-Stojko Ż,
    9. Jurzak M,
    10. Buszman E,
    11. Stojko J
    : Caffeic acid phenethyl ester and ethanol extract of propolis induce the complementary cytotoxic effect on triple-negative breast cancer cell lines. Molecules 20(5): 9242-9262, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  118. ↵
    1. Omene C,
    2. Wu J,
    3. Frenkel K
    : Caffeic acid phenethyl ester (CAPE) derived from propolis, a honeybee product, inhibits growth of breast cancer stem cells. Invest New Drugs 30(4): 1279-1288, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Lonardo E,
    2. Hermann P,
    3. Heeschen C
    : Pancreatic cancer stem cells: update and future perspectives. Mol Oncol 4(5): 431-442, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 6
June 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells and Therapeutic Approaches
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 7 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells and Therapeutic Approaches
GULINNAZ ERCAN, AYFER KARLITEPE, BULENT OZPOLAT
Anticancer Research Jun 2017, 37 (6) 2761-2775;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells and Therapeutic Approaches
GULINNAZ ERCAN, AYFER KARLITEPE, BULENT OZPOLAT
Anticancer Research Jun 2017, 37 (6) 2761-2775;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Pancreatic Cancer
    • Biology and Genetics of PaCa
    • Normal and Cancer Stem Cells
    • PaCa Stem Cells
    • Signaling Pathways Important for Pancreatic CSCs
    • Major Obstacles and Potential Strategies for Targeting Pancreatic CSCs
    • Potential Therapies Targeting CSCs
    • Role of MicroRNA (miRNA, miR) in Pancreatic CSCs
    • Immunotherapy for Pancreatic CSCs
    • Natural Dietary Compounds Against Pancreatic CSCs
    • Future Perspective and Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Spatial Biology and Organoid Technologies Reveal a Potential Therapy-Resistant Cancer Stem Cell Population in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • Proteomic Analysis of Malignant Ascites From Patients With Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • Targeted Therapies for Pancreatic Cancer and Hurdles Ahead
  • Pre-operative Plasma miR-21-5p Is a Sensitive Biomarker and Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Undergoing Surgical Resection
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Show more Reviews

Keywords

  • pancreatic cancer
  • cancer stem cells
  • polyphenolic
  • microRNA
  • targeted therapy
  • immunotherapy
  • drug resistance
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire