Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

CYFRA 21-1 as a Predictive Marker for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy

KAZUKI SONE, TETSUYA OGURI, MAKOTO NAKAO, YUSUKE KAGAWA, RYOTA KUROWAKA, HIROMI FURUTA, SATOSHI FUKUDA, TAKEHIRO UEMURA, OSAMU TAKAKUWA, YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU, HIROTSUGU OHKUBO, MASAYA TAKEMURA, KEN MAENO, YUTAKA ITO, HIDEFUMI SATO, HIDEKI MURAMATSU and AKIO NIIMI
Anticancer Research February 2017, 37 (2) 935-939;
KAZUKI SONE
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TETSUYA OGURI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: t-oguri@med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp
MAKOTO NAKAO
2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUSUKE KAGAWA
2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYOTA KUROWAKA
2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROMI FURUTA
3Department of Thoracic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SATOSHI FUKUDA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKEHIRO UEMURA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
OSAMU TAKAKUWA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROTSUGU OHKUBO
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAYA TAKEMURA
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KEN MAENO
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUTAKA ITO
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEFUMI SATO
2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEKI MURAMATSU
2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Kainan Hospital Aichi Prefectural Welfare Federation of Agricultural Cooperatives, Yatomi, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIO NIIMI
1Department of Respiratory Medicine, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Pretreatment serum tumor marker levels predict outcome in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, little is known about the clinical value of such measurements for patients treated with pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively screened 100 chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-squamous NSCLC treated with pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative in relation to the pretreatment level of cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Results: Sixty one patients with a high CYFRA 21-1 level had statistically shorter progression-free and overall survival than 39 patients with a normal CYFRA 21-1 level (median progression-free survival=127 days vs. 191 days, respectively; p=0.046; median overall survival=360 days vs. 781 days, respectively, p<0.001). Serum CEA level was not related to survival. Conclusion: Serum CYFRA 21-1 level is a predictive and prognostic marker in patients with NSCLC treated with pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative.

  • Cytokeratin 19 fragment
  • tumor marker
  • pemetrexed
  • non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Pemetrexed is one of the most widely used cytotoxic agents, and is especially effective for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (non-SqNSCLC) (1). In first-line studies, pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative was better tolerated and offered superior survival than conventional treatment (2, 3). Moreover, it was demonstrated that pemetrexed maintenance therapy prolonged overall survival (OS) and was well tolerated (4). Pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative is recommended as standard therapy for advanced non-SqNSCLC. However, clinical predictive markers for the therapeutic effect of pemetrexed-based chemotherapy have not been established.

It has been shown in meta-analysis that cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1), which is usually used as a tumor marker of lung cancer, is a prognostic indicator of NSCLC (5, 6). Fiala et al. reported that the pretreatment serum level of CYFRA 21-1 and other tumor markers predict shorter OS in patients treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (7). However, little is known about the predictive value of serum tumor markers for advanced patients with non-SqNSCLC treated with pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative.

The aim of the present study was to analyze the predictive and prognostic value of the pretreatment serum level of CYFRA 21-1 and of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with advanced-stage non-SqNSCLC treated with pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative in a first-line setting.

Patients and Methods

In this retrospective cohort study, we screened cases of chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non-SqNSCLC treated with pemetrexed plus a platinum derivative at Nagoya City University Hospital and the Kainan Hospital (Japan) between 2010 and 2015. Approval for the study was obtained from our Institutional Ethics Committee (no. 1301), and routine medical data were analyzed under complete anonymity. All patients had locally advanced (stage IIIB) or metastasized (stage IV) non-SqNSCLC. Patients received pemetrexed at a dose of 500 mg/m2 on day 1 and either cisplatin at a dose of 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or carboplatin at the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 on day 1 every 3 weeks. Induction treatment with platinum derivative was scheduled for up to 4-6 cycles, followed by maintenance pemetrexed monotherapy in patients with non-progressive disease. Addition of pemetrexed monotherapy was at the treating physician's discretion.

The serum CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were measured before the initial chemotherapy. The serum CYFRA 21-1 level was measured using a commercial electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on LUMIPULSE Presto II system (Fujirebio Inc., Tokyo, Japan) or Cobas 8000 system (Roche Diagnostics, Tokyo, Japan). The serum CEA level was measured using a commercial electrochemiluminescence immunoassay on HISCL-5000 system (Sysmex, Hyogo, Japan) or Cobas 8000 system (Roche Diagnostics). Measurements were made at laboratories in the two hospitals, using cut-off values of 3.5 ng/ml for CYFRA 21-1, and 5.0 ng/ml for CEA, which were the upper limit of normal values at the two hospitals.

Statistical analysis. The response rate (RR) was defined as the best overall response according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumours (RECIST) (8). The disease control rate (DCR) was defined as the percentage of patients who did not have progressive disease. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) was measured from the date of the first course of initial chemotherapy to the date of first disease progression, of death, or of the last follow-up. OS was measured from the date of the first course of initial chemotherapy to the date of death or of the last follow-up. Differences in RR and DCR between groups were evaluated using Fisher's exact test. A log-rank test was performed to evaluate the significance of differences in PFS and OS between the groups. As a level of statistical significance, a value of p=0.05 was used. Univariate analyses were carried out by means of log-rank tests. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model was used to establish the association between the clinical variables and survivals, and p=0.10 was the significance level used for adding or deleting a covariable from the model. As the level of statistical significance in the model, p=0.05 was used. All statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). More precisely, it is a modified version of R commander designed to add statistical functions frequently used in biostatistics (9).

Results

The study included 100 patients whose characteristics are shown in Table I. The median age was 67 years (range= 40-81 years). Thirty-three patients (33%) were female, and 25 (25%) were never smokers. Most patients had adenocarcinoma, and most patients had stage IV disease. Ninety-eight patients (98%) had a good performance status (PS) (0 or 1). Twenty-one patients (21%) had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, and four patients (4%) had anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocation; no patient had both gene mutations.

Sixty-one (61%) patients had a serum CYFRA 21-1 level that was above the normal upper limit of 3.5 ng/ml before the initial chemotherapy. The serum CEA level was elevated (>5.0 ng/ml) in 89 patients before the initial chemotherapy. At the time of analysis, the median follow-up was 426 days (range=24-1374 days). There was no difference in RR between patients with a high and those with a normal CYFRA 21-1 level (36.1% vs. 33.3%, p=0.8323). Patients with a high CYFRA 21-1 level tended to have a lower DCR than patients with a normal CYFRA 21-1 level (77% vs. 92.3%, p=0.0587). Patients with a high level of CYFRA 21-1 also experienced statistically shorter PFS compared with those with a normal level (log-rank p=0.035), with a median PFS of 129 days [95% confidence interval (CI)=103-152 days] vs. 172 days (95% CI=103-349 days) respectively (p=0.046) (Figure 1A). The median duration of PFS of patients with high and normal serum CEA levels was 149 days (95% CI=129-172 days) and 111 days (95% CI=99-158 days), respectively (p=0.963).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patient characteristics (n=100).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kaplan–Meier survival curves of progression-free (A) and overall (B) survival according to serum cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) level. The median PFS in patients with high and normal serum CYFRA 21-1 levels was 127 days [95% confidence interval (CI)=103-152 days] and 191 days (95% CI=103-349 days), respectively (p=0.046). The median OS in patients with high and normal levels of CYFRA 21-1 was 360 days (95% CI=299-425 days) and 781 days (95% CI=457-1038 days), respectively (p<0.001).

To determine potential predictive factors among clinical characteristics including the serum CYFRA 21-1 and CEA level in the patients with non-SqNSCLC treated with pemetrexed and platinum derivatives, we performed a univariate analysis on the clinical variables listed in Table II. Stage, histological type and performance status were excluded from the analysis because they were too one-sided. A high level of CYFRA 21-1 was statistically the only factor with predictive efficacy (p=0.035). As shown in Figure 1B, the median duration of OS for patients with high and normal levels of CYFRA 21-1 was 360 days (95% CI=299-425 days) and 781 days (95% CI=457-1038 days), respectively (p<0.001). The median duration of OS of patients with high and normal serum CEA levels was 468 days (95% CI=370-668 days) and 365 days (95% CI=290-771 days), respectively (p=0.664).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Univariate analysis of survival by log-rank test.

Potential prognostic factors were subjected to a univariate survival analysis (Table II). Never-smoked status (p=0.017), presence of driver mutations (EGFR mutation or ALK translocation), and a normal serum CYFRA 21-1 level were associated with better OS. To determine independent prognostic factors, we performed multivariate analyses (Table III). Lack of driver mutation (p<0.022), no pretreatment (p=0.008) and a normal serum CYFRA 21-1 level (p=0.007) were statistically independent prognostic factors for better OS. In the population without driver mutations, the median duration of OS in patients with a high (n=50) and those with normal (n=25) levels of CYFRA 21-1 was 349 days (95% CI=263-425 days) and 613 days (95% CI=418-934 days), respectively (p=0.009).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Multivariate analysis of overall survival by a Cox proportional hazards model.

Discussion

This study showed that a high level of serum CYFRA 21-1 before initial chemotherapy was related to shorter PFS and OS, and a worse DCR with pemetrexed plus a platinum-derivative therapy in patients with advanced non-SqNSCLC. The duration of OS correlated with serum CYFRA 21-1 levels in multivariate analysis, whether patients had driver mutations or not, and whether patients took pretreatment of EGFR-TKI or not. Considering the survival benefit of EGFR-TKI for patients with EGFR mutation, the serum CYFRA 21-1 level was the only factor by which the effectiveness of chemotherapy could be predicted in this study.

In previous meta-analysis, high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 levels were related to shorter OS in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC, and the findings of the present study are consistent with (5, 6). However, regarding PFS, only one study has reported that the serum CYFRA 21-1 level predicted the duration of PFS in patients treated with carboplatin plus gemcitabine-treated for advanced NSCLC (10). Thus, it is not clear whether CYFRA 21-1 is only a factor predictive of antimetabolite-based chemotherapies, or whether it is also a predictive of various other regimens (e.g. taxanes or topoisomerase inhibitors). On the other hand, in patients operated on for early-stage NSCLC, a high preoperative serum CYFRA 21-1 level was associated with poor survival (5, 6). Considering that outcome, a high CYFRA level might lead to a worse outcome through tumor burden. Similarly, it is considered that a high tumor load leads to a worse outcome in patients with advanced-stage disease. However, the serum CEA level was not found to be related to survival in this study. These data suggest that not only tumor burden, but also tumor properties influence outcome.

Histological heterogeneity in lung cancer might also have an effect on outcome (11, 12). Pemetrexed treatment provides a better survival advantage for patients with tumors with a non-squamous histology than for those with a squamous histology (1). The fact that CYFRA 21-1 is a specific marker for squamous cell carcinoma (13, 14) suggests that elevated levels of serum CYFRA 21-1 indicate the presence of squamous cell components. For most patients with advanced NSCLC, histological classification of the tumor is based on a small biopsy or on cytological specimens. Pathogenic diagnosis of NSCLC based on a small biopsy has been shown to involve many false-positives/-negatives (15). In similar studies, it was reported that CYFRA 21-1 predicted the efficacy of EGFR-TKI treatment in patients with NSCLC harboring an EGFR mutation (16), and that patients whose tumors harbored an EGFR mutation with squamous histology had a shorter PFS (17). These data emphasize the importance of considering tumor heterogeneity in advanced lung cancer.

Our study has certain limitations. Firstly, not all patients with non-progressive disease in induction therapy underwent pemetrexed maintenance monotherapy. This may have influenced PFS and OS. Secondly, we adopted the upper limit of normal values at the two hospitals as the cut-off point for the serum tumor markers. However, these levels were decided from the viewpoint of diagnostic value. Therefore there may be better cut-off points for marker levels when considering predictive or prognostic value. Furthermore, it is expected that more effective therapeutic drugs for patients with high CYFRA 21-1 levels will be identified in the future. Other strategies, such as the addition of an anti-angiogenic inhibitor to pemetrexed-based chemotherapy or the use of an immunocheckpoint inhibitor, are considered worthy of consideration.

In conclusion, our study suggests that a high serum level of CYFRA 21-1 before treatment is a predictive and prognostic factor of therapy with pemetrexed combined with a platinum derivative therapy in patients with non-SqNSCLC.

Acknowledgements

The Authors thank Dr. Takefumi Kunieda for his assistance and stimulating discussions.

  • Received December 18, 2016.
  • Revision received January 26, 2017.
  • Accepted January 27, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Scagliotti G,
    2. Hanna N,
    3. Fossella F,
    4. Sugarman K,
    5. Blatter J,
    6. Peterson P,
    7. Simms L,
    8. Shepherd FA
    : The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to nsclc histology: A review of two phase III studies. Oncologist 14(3): 253-263, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Scagliotti GV,
    2. Parikh P,
    3. von Pawel J,
    4. Biesma B,
    5. Vansteenkiste J,
    6. Manegold C,
    7. Serwatowski P,
    8. Gatzemeier U,
    9. Digumarti R,
    10. Zukin M,
    11. Lee JS,
    12. Mellemgaard A,
    13. Park K,
    14. Patil S,
    15. Rolski J,
    16. Goksel T,
    17. de Marinis F,
    18. Simms L,
    19. Sugarman KP,
    20. Gandara D
    : Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(21): 3543-3551, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rodrigues-Pereira J,
    2. Kim JH,
    3. Magallanes M,
    4. Lee DH,
    5. Wang J,
    6. Ganju V,
    7. Martinez-Barrera L,
    8. Barraclough H,
    9. van Kooten M,
    10. Orlando M
    : A randomized phase 3 trial comparing pemetrexed/carboplatin and docetaxel/carboplatin as first-line treatment for advanced, nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 6(11): 1907-1914, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Paz-Ares LG,
    2. de Marinis F,
    3. Dediu M,
    4. Thomas M,
    5. Pujol JL,
    6. Bidoli P,
    7. Molinier O,
    8. Sahoo TP,
    9. Laack E,
    10. Reck M,
    11. Corral J,
    12. Melemed S,
    13. John W,
    14. Chouaki N,
    15. Zimmermann AH,
    16. Visseren-Grul C,
    17. Gridelli C
    : Paramount: Final overall survival results of the phase iii study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo immediately after induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31(23): 2895-2902, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Xu Y,
    2. Xu L,
    3. Qiu M,
    4. Wang J,
    5. Zhou Q,
    6. Yin R
    : Prognostic value of serum cytokeratin 19 fragments (CYFRA 21-1) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Sci Rep 5: 9444, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    1. Pujol JL,
    2. Molinier O,
    3. Ebert W,
    4. Daures JP,
    5. Barlesi F,
    6. Buccheri G,
    7. Paesmans M,
    8. Quoix E,
    9. Moro-Sibilot D,
    10. Szturmowicz M,
    11. Brechot JM,
    12. Muley T,
    13. Grenier J
    : Cyfra 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: Results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients. Br J Cancer 90(11): 2097-2105, 2004.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Fiala O,
    2. Pesek M,
    3. Finek J,
    4. Svaton M,
    5. Sorejs O,
    6. Bortlicek Z,
    7. Kucera R,
    8. Topolcan O
    : Prognostic significance of serum tumor markers in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. Anticancer Res 36(1): 461-466, 2016.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Eisenhauer EA,
    2. Therasse P,
    3. Bogaerts J,
    4. Schwartz LH,
    5. Sargent D,
    6. Ford R,
    7. Dancey J,
    8. Arbuck S,
    9. Gwyther S,
    10. Mooney M,
    11. Rubinstein L,
    12. Shankar L,
    13. Dodd L,
    14. Kaplan R,
    15. Lacombe D,
    16. Verweij J
    : New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 45(2): 228-247, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kanda Y
    : Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48(3): 452-458, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Edelman MJ,
    2. Hodgson L,
    3. Rosenblatt PY,
    4. Christenson RH,
    5. Vokes EE,
    6. Wang X,
    7. Kratzke R
    : CYFRA 21-1 as a prognostic and predictive marker in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer in a prospective trial: Calgb 150304. J Thorac Oncol 7(4): 649-654, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Roggli VL,
    2. Vollmer RT,
    3. Greenberg SD,
    4. McGavran MH,
    5. Spjut HJ,
    6. Yesner R
    : Lung cancer heterogeneity: A blinded and randomized study of 100 consecutive cases. Hum Pathol 16(6): 569-579, 1985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Travis WD,
    2. Rekhtman N,
    3. Riley GJ,
    4. Geisinger KR,
    5. Asamura H,
    6. Brambilla E,
    7. Garg K,
    8. Hirsch FR,
    9. Noguchi M,
    10. Powell CA,
    11. Rusch VW,
    12. Scagliotti G,
    13. Yatabe Y
    : Pathologic diagnosis of advanced lung cancer based on small biopsies and cytology: A paradigm shift. J Thorac Oncol 5(4): 411-414, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pujol JL,
    2. Grenier J,
    3. Daures JP,
    4. Daver A,
    5. Pujol H,
    6. Michel FB
    : Serum fragment of cytokeratin subunit 19 measured by CYFRA 21-1 immunoradiometric assay as a marker of lung cancer. Cancer Res 53(1): 61-66, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Kulpa J,
    2. Wojcik E,
    3. Reinfuss M,
    4. Kolodziejski L
    : Carcinoembryonic antigen, squamous cell carcinoma antigen, CYFRA 21-1, and neuron-specific enolase in squamous cell lung cancer patients. Clin Chem 48(11): 1931-1937, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Cataluna JJ,
    2. Perpina M,
    3. Greses JV,
    4. Calvo V,
    5. Padilla JD,
    6. Paris F
    : Cell type accuracy of bronchial biopsy specimens in primary lung cancer. Chest 109(5): 1199-1203, 1996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Tanaka K,
    2. Hata A,
    3. Kaji R,
    4. Fujita S,
    5. Otoshi T,
    6. Fujimoto D,
    7. Kawamura T,
    8. Tamai K,
    9. Takeshita J,
    10. Matsumoto T,
    11. Monden K,
    12. Nagata K,
    13. Otsuka K,
    14. Nakagawa A,
    15. Tachikawa R,
    16. Tomii K,
    17. Katakami N
    : Cytokeratin 19 fragment predicts the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation. J Thorac Oncol 8(7): 892-898, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Shukuya T,
    2. Takahashi T,
    3. Kaira R,
    4. Ono A,
    5. Nakamura Y,
    6. Tsuya A,
    7. Kenmotsu H,
    8. Naito T,
    9. Kaira K,
    10. Murakami H,
    11. Endo M,
    12. Takahashi K,
    13. Yamamoto N
    : Efficacy of gefitinib for non-adenocarcinoma non-small-cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: A pooled analysis of published reports. Cancer Sci 102(5): 1032-1037, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 37 (2)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 2
February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CYFRA 21-1 as a Predictive Marker for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
4 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
CYFRA 21-1 as a Predictive Marker for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy
KAZUKI SONE, TETSUYA OGURI, MAKOTO NAKAO, YUSUKE KAGAWA, RYOTA KUROWAKA, HIROMI FURUTA, SATOSHI FUKUDA, TAKEHIRO UEMURA, OSAMU TAKAKUWA, YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU, HIROTSUGU OHKUBO, MASAYA TAKEMURA, KEN MAENO, YUTAKA ITO, HIDEFUMI SATO, HIDEKI MURAMATSU, AKIO NIIMI
Anticancer Research Feb 2017, 37 (2) 935-939;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
CYFRA 21-1 as a Predictive Marker for Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Pemetrexed-based Chemotherapy
KAZUKI SONE, TETSUYA OGURI, MAKOTO NAKAO, YUSUKE KAGAWA, RYOTA KUROWAKA, HIROMI FURUTA, SATOSHI FUKUDA, TAKEHIRO UEMURA, OSAMU TAKAKUWA, YOSHIHIRO KANEMITSU, HIROTSUGU OHKUBO, MASAYA TAKEMURA, KEN MAENO, YUTAKA ITO, HIDEFUMI SATO, HIDEKI MURAMATSU, AKIO NIIMI
Anticancer Research Feb 2017, 37 (2) 935-939;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Variants of SLC22A16 Predict the Efficacy of Platinum Combination Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer
  • TTF-1 Expression Predicts the Merit of Additional Antiangiogenic Treatment in Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
  • Predictive and Prognostic Value of CYFRA 21-1 for Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with EGFR-TKIs
  • Predictive Role of CYFRA21-1 and CEA for Subsequent Docetaxel in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Characterization of the Immunological Status of Hypermutated Solid Tumors in the Cancer Genome Analysis Project HOPE
  • Clinical Outcomes of Scanning Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma of the Extremities
  • The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index as a Prognosis Predictor in Patients With Rectal Cancer Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cytokeratin 19 fragment
  • tumor marker
  • pemetrexed
  • Non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
Anticancer Research

© 2022 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire