Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Surgical Resection for Lymph Node Metastasis After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

TORU IKEGAMI, TOMOHARU YOSHIZUMI, JYUNJI KAWASAKI, AKIHISA NAGATSU, HIDEAKI UCHIYAMA, NOBORU HARADA, NORIFUMI HARIMOTO, SHINJI ITOH, TAKASHI MOTOMURA, YUJI SOEJIMA and YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research February 2017, 37 (2) 891-895;
TORU IKEGAMI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: tikesurg{at}surg2.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
TOMOHARU YOSHIZUMI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JYUNJI KAWASAKI
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIHISA NAGATSU
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIDEAKI UCHIYAMA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NOBORU HARADA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NORIFUMI HARIMOTO
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINJI ITOH
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKASHI MOTOMURA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUJI SOEJIMA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Treatment strategies for lymph node (LN) metastasis after liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have not been studied. Patients and Methods: The treatment modes and outcomes in patients with LN metastasis after LT (n=6) for HCC were reviewed. Results: The mean time from LT to LN recurrence was 2.0±1.3 years, and the locations of the LNs recurrences included the phrenic (n=2), common hepatic artery (n=2), inferior vena cava (n=1) and gastric (n=1) regions. Treatments included surgery alone (n=3), surgery followed by chemoradiation (n=1), radiation followed by chemotherapy (n=1), and chemotherapy, radiation and sorafenib (n=1). Although the patients receiving non-surgical treatments (n=3) died within 1.2 years, those who underwent surgical removal of the metastatic LNs survived 11.2 years, 4.5 years and 0.8 years, respectively, without any signs of re-recurrence. Conclusion: Surgical resection is the only feasible and potentially curative treatment for LN metastasis after LT for HCC.

  • Living donor liver transplantation
  • hepatocellular carcinoma
  • treatment for recurrence
  • lymph node metastasis

Liver transplantation (LT) has become one of the treatments of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with an acceptable long-term survival rate in patients other than those with very advanced disease (1). However, HCC recurrence after LT remains a problem, occurring in up to 10-20% of transplanted patients and resulting in drastically decreased survival after recurrence (1, 2). Strategies to treat such recurrences after LT have not been studied in detail, in contrast to the extensive research that has been performed on possible predictors for post-LT HCC recurrence (1, 2).

A few reports have recently shown that surgical resection might be a more effective treatment option than other non-surgical treatments, including chemotherapy (2, 3). However, these studies focused on metastasis to the lung, liver allograft, abdominal cavity or bone; few have addressed the feasibility of surgical management of lymph-node (LN) metastasis (2, 3). Therefore, we herein present the treatments and outcomes of six patients who developed LN metastasis of HCC after LT.

Patients and Methods

In total, 211 living donor LTs (LDLTs) for HCC were performed at Kyushu University Hospital beginning in October 1996 after approval from the Ethics and Indications Committee of Kyushu University. The selection criteria for LDLT for HCC excluded apparent macroscopic vascular invasion, extrahepatic metastasis, and a tumor size of >5 cm with a des-gamma carboxyprothrombin concentration of >300 mAU/ml. The LDLT procedures for donor and recipients, perioperative care, and immunosuppression regimen were performed as previously reported (3). No adjuvant chemotherapy was performed.

The routine clinical follow-up of the patients receiving LDLT for HCC included measurement of tumor markers (des-gamma carboxyprothrombin and alpha-fetoprotein) every 3 months and a thoracoabdominal-pelvis computed tomography scan every 6 months. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron-emission tomography and bone scintigraphy were performed if an increase in the tumor marker concentrations was noted.

Results

Among the patients who underwent LDLT for HCC (n=212), 28 patients showed recurrent HCC in the lung (n=9), LNs (n=6), bone (n=5), liver (n=4), peritoneum (n=3) and adrenal gland (n=1). The mean period from LDLT to recurrence was 1.7±1.3 years. The 5- and 10-year cumulative patient survival rates were 89.3% and 85.5% in those without recurrence (n=184) and 38.8% and 30.7% in those with recurrence, respectively (p<0.01).

Six patients (three male, three female, average age=58.5±5.1 years) presented with recurrent disease in the LNs (Figure 1, Table I). Only one patient received a right lobe graft, the others had left lobe grafts. In terms of primary HCC, the initial two patients (patients 1 and 2) were outside the Milan criteria and others were within the criteria. Poorly differentiated components were observed in two patients patients 3 and 6) by microscopic examination of the explanted liver. The mean time from LDLT to LN recurrence was 2.0±1.3 years. The mean size of the recurrent tumor was 2.4±0.8 cm and all tumors were solitary except those in patient 3. The locations of the recurrences were the phrenic (n=2), common hepatic artery (CHA) (n=2), inferior vena cava (IVC) (n=1) and gastric (n=1) LNs.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Lymph node (LN) metastasis after living donor liver transplantation in patient 1 at the gastric LN (A), patient 2 at the vena cava LN (B), patients 3 (C) and 4 (D) at the hepatic artery LN, and patients 5 (E) and 6 (F) at the phrenic LN.

Treatments were surgery alone in three patients, surgery followed by chemoradiation in one, radiation followed by chemotherapy in one, and chemotherapy, radiation and sorafenib in one (Table I).

Patient 1 initially underwent laparotomy and surgical resection for HCC recurrence in a gastric LN at the lesser curvature (Figure 1A), 4.9 years after LDLT. Three months after the LN removal, he developed two 3-cm HCC recurrences at the root of the middle hepatic vein in the transplanted liver, and received chemotherapy comprising 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/day) and cisplatin (5 mg/day) with local radiation therapy (30 Gy). However, his disease progressed systemically and he died 7 months after the initial recurrence.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Six cases with lymph node (LN) metastasis after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Patient 2 developed HCC recurrence in a LN adjacent to the hepatic IVC (Figure 1B) and received radiation (50 Gy) resulting in progressive disease, followed by chemotherapy comprising 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and cisplatin (5 mg/day). However, he had multiple lung metastases and died 1.2 years after the recurrence.

Patient 3 developed HCC recurrence in LNs at the CHA (Figure 1C). He received gemcitabine (1400 mg/body), 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/day) and cisplatin (5mg/day) resulting in progressive disease, followed by radiation (50G) and sorafenib. He developed multiple bone metastases and died 6 months later.

Patient 4 developed recurrent HCC in a LN at the CHA (Figure 1D), and both patient 5 (Figure 1E) and patient 6 (Figure 1F) developed recurrence in LNs on the diaphragm. Because we recognized at that time that nonsurgical treatment does not offer sufficient outcomes, we performed surgical resection despite the fact that the surgical approach to the lesions was not expected to be easy. Nevertheless, the operative time and blood loss for patients 4, 5, and 6 were 140 min and 60 g, 141 min and 129 g, and 144 min and 60 g, respectively, with uneventful post-surgical courses. In Patient 6, the recurrent nodule was identified just behind the junction of the hepatic and cardiac IVC on the diaphragm, and we performed a thoracolaparotomy (Figure 2A) to divide and follow the diaphragm to reach the target LN safely and effectively, avoiding injury to the middle hepatic vein on the surface of the extended left lobe graft and the IVC. By placement of the surgeon's fingers behind the diaphragm and IVC to identify and hold the targeted tumor, surgical resection of the recurrent mass was safely performed (Figure 2B). The postoperative survival period for patients 4, 5, and 6 was 11.2 years, 4.5 years and 0.8 years, respectively without any signs of re-recurrence.

Discussion

Application of the Milan criteria has allowed for widespread acceptance of LT as a treatment of choice for HCC during the past two decades, and a very low recurrence rate after LT for HCC has been achieved even following the extended criteria of LT for HCC (1). On the other hand, although the management of recurrent HCC after LT has become an issue of clinical interest, as far as we are aware, no clinical trials, prospective studies, consensus or guidelines exist on this topic (1-3).

Recurrent HCC after LT is characterized by accelerated progression and frequent extrahepatic metastasis to the lung, bone, and other organs, and these characteristics are quite different from those of HCC recurrence after hepatic resection (2, 3). de'Angelis, et al. performed a systematic review of 1021 LT recipients and found that two-thirds of the patients had extrahepatic metastasis, the median time from LT to HCC recurrence was 13 months, and the survival after recurrence was 13 months (2). Despite the very poor overall prognosis, recent reports have demonstrated that curative-intent treatments such as locoregional therapy and surgical tumor removal can increase long-term survival (5). Bodzin et al. showed that patients who received surgical treatment for HCC recurrence in the lung, liver graft, abdominal cavity, bone or brain after LT had a median survival of 27.8 months, compared with 10.6 months under non-surgical therapy and 3.6 months under best supportive care, despite significant bias in the recurrence pattern for receiving surgical resection (3).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Thoracoabdominal approach with division of the diaphragm (A) and phrenic lymph node metastasis (B) just behind the vena cava in patient 6. Positive fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (C) and (D) the resected specimenfrompatient 6.

We have described the pattern of LN metastasis of HCC after LT and the feasibility and effectiveness of surgical LN dissection in the current series. All but one (patient 3) of the six patients with LN metastasis had a solitary LN metastasis, and this finding is quite unique. In most cases of HCC recurrence after LT, HCC recurs secondary to circulating HCC clones that become engrafted in a hematogenous manner and grow within targeted organs; alternatively, non-detectable metastases may already be present even before LT. Because LN metastasis is not hematogenous but lymphatic, and because most of the patients with LN metastasis in the current series had a solitary lesion, we consider that our patients had non-detectable perihepatic local metastasis within the lymphatic defense system at the time of LT.

The feasibility of a surgical approach for the removal of perihepatic LNs was unexpectedly acceptable with an operative time of only a few hours and blood loss of <100 g. This is because the tissue conditions had improved since the first few months after LT, at which time they were fragile, edematous and bloody. Thus, it was possible to very safely approach LN metastases in very surgically challenging locations, as in patient 6 (just behind the IVC on the diaphragm). In patient 2, although the peri-IVC LN was surgically approachable, we were unable to evaluate the lesion as being approachable at that time point because of our lack of experience. Nevertheless, multiple LN recurrences, as in patient 3, or multiple distant metastases from LNs, such as in patient 1 and 2, are still difficult to treat. Previous reports have shown that systemic chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil or cisplatin has very limited efficacy in controlling HCC recurrence (2, 3). Only sorafenib has the potential to stabilize the disease, however complete responses are very limited (2, 3).

In summary, LN metastasis after LT for HCC presents as a solitary lesion in the majority of patients, and surgical resection is the only feasible and potentially curative treatment.

Footnotes

  • Financial Support

    This study was supported in part by a grant-in-aid for Scientific Research (16fk0210303h0003) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

  • Disclosure

    The Authors have no conflicts of interest to report. The article was not prepared or funded by a commercial organization.

  • Received November 14, 2016.
  • Revision received January 26, 2017.
  • Accepted January 27, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Mazzaferro V,
    2. Llovet JM,
    3. Miceli R,
    4. Bhoori S,
    5. Schiavo M,
    6. Mariani L,
    7. Camerini T,
    8. Roayaie S,
    9. Schwartz ME,
    10. Grazi GL,
    11. Adam R,
    12. Neuhaus P,
    13. Salizzoni M,
    14. Bruix J,
    15. Forner A,
    16. De Carlis L,
    17. Cillo U,
    18. Burroughs AK,
    19. Troisi R,
    20. Rossi M,
    21. Gerunda GE,
    22. Lerut J,
    23. Belghiti J,
    24. Boin I,
    25. Gugenheim J,
    26. Rochling F,
    27. Van Hoek B,
    28. Majno P,
    29. Metroticket Investigator Study Group
    : Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma beyond the Milan criteria: a retrospective, exploratory analysis. Lancet Oncol 10: 35-43, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. de'Angelis N,
    2. Landi F,
    3. Carra MC,
    4. Azoulay D
    : Managements of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: A systematic review. World J Gastroenterol 21: 11185-11198, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Bodzin AS,
    2. Lunsford KE,
    3. Markovic D,
    4. Harlander-Locke MP,
    5. Busuttil RW,
    6. Agopian VG
    : Predicting mortality in patients developing recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: impact of treatment modality and recurrence characteristics. Ann Surg, 2016. doi: 10.1097/SLA.000000 0000001894. [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Ikegami T,
    2. Shirabe K,
    3. Soejima Y,
    4. Yoshizumi T,
    5. Uchiyama H,
    6. Yamashita Y,
    7. Harimoto N,
    8. Toshima T,
    9. Yoshiya S,
    10. Ikeda T,
    11. Maehara Y
    : Strategies for successful left-lobe living donor liver transplantation in 250 consecutive adult cases in a single center. J Am Coll Surg 216: 353-362, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sapisochin G,
    2. Goldaracena N,
    3. Astete S,
    4. Laurence JM,
    5. Davidson D,
    6. Rafael E,
    7. Castells L,
    8. Sandroussi C,
    9. Bilbao I,
    10. Dopazo C,
    11. Grant DR,
    12. Lázaro JL,
    13. Caralt M,
    14. Ghanekar A,
    15. McGilvray ID,
    16. Lilly L,
    17. Cattral MS,
    18. Selzner M,
    19. Charco R,
    20. Greig PD
    : Benefit of treating hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after liver transplantation and analysis of prognostic factors for survival in a large Euro-American series. Ann Surg Oncol 22: 2286-2294, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 2
February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Surgical Resection for Lymph Node Metastasis After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
8 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Surgical Resection for Lymph Node Metastasis After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
TORU IKEGAMI, TOMOHARU YOSHIZUMI, JYUNJI KAWASAKI, AKIHISA NAGATSU, HIDEAKI UCHIYAMA, NOBORU HARADA, NORIFUMI HARIMOTO, SHINJI ITOH, TAKASHI MOTOMURA, YUJI SOEJIMA, YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research Feb 2017, 37 (2) 891-895;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Surgical Resection for Lymph Node Metastasis After Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
TORU IKEGAMI, TOMOHARU YOSHIZUMI, JYUNJI KAWASAKI, AKIHISA NAGATSU, HIDEAKI UCHIYAMA, NOBORU HARADA, NORIFUMI HARIMOTO, SHINJI ITOH, TAKASHI MOTOMURA, YUJI SOEJIMA, YOSHIHIKO MAEHARA
Anticancer Research Feb 2017, 37 (2) 891-895;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Association of Tumor Budding Grade With Immunohistochemical Expression of Thrombin and PAR-1 in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
  • Laparoscopy-assisted Partial Cecum Resection Versus Ileocecal Resection for Non-malignant Appendiceal Neoplasms
  • Automated Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Carcinoma Using Deep Learning on Pretreatment Core Needle Biopsy Samples
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Living donor liver transplantation
  • Hepatocellular carcinoma
  • treatment for recurrence
  • lymph node metastasis
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire