Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticleReviewsR

Italian Prostate Biopsies Group: 2016 Updated Guidelines Insights

ANDREA FANDELLA, VINCENZO SCATTONI, ANDREA GALOSI, PIETRO PEPE, MICHELANGELO FIORENTINO, CATERINA GAUDIANO, MARCO GIAMPAOLI, ROBERTA GUNELLI, PASQUALE MARTINO, VITTORINO MONTANARO, RODOLFO MONTIRONI, TIZIANA PIERANGELI, ARMANDO STABILE and ALESSANDRO BERTACCINI
Anticancer Research February 2017, 37 (2) 413-424;
ANDREA FANDELLA
1Department of Urology, Giovanni XXIII Clinic, Monastier di Treviso, Treviso, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VINCENZO SCATTONI
2Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: scattoni.vincenzo@hsr.it
ANDREA GALOSI
3Institute of Urology, Marche Polytechnic University, Riuniti Hospital, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PIETRO PEPE
4Department of Urology, Canizzaro Hospital, Catania, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHELANGELO FIORENTINO
5Department of Pathology, F. Addari Institute of Oncology, S. Orsola Hospital, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CATERINA GAUDIANO
6Department of Radiology, S. Orsola – Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARCO GIAMPAOLI
7Institute of Urology, S. Orsola – Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERTA GUNELLI
8Department of Urology, Hospital of Forlì, Forlì, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PASQUALE MARTINO
9Department of Urology, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VITTORINO MONTANARO
10Department of Urology, Federico II University Hospital, Naples, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RODOLFO MONTIRONI
11Institute of Pathology, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TIZIANA PIERANGELI
12Prostate Cancer Prevention Unit, Department of Urology, INRCA, Ancona, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARMANDO STABILE
2Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ALESSANDRO BERTACCINI
7Institute of Urology, S. Orsola – Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To present a summary of the updated guidelines of the Italian Prostate Biopsies Group following the best recent evidence of the literature. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of the new data emerging from 2012-2015 was performed by a panel of 14 selected Italian experts in urology, pathology and radiology. The experts collected articles published in the English-language literature by performing a search using Medline, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library database. The articles were evaluated using a systematic weighting and grading of the level of the evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework system. Results: An initial prostate biopsy is strongly recommended when i) prostate specific antigen (PSA) >10 ng/ml, ii) digital rectal examination is abnormal, iii) multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has a Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS) ≥4, even if it is not recommended. The use of mpMRI is strongly recommended only in patients with previous negative biopsy. At least 12 cores should be taken in each patient plus targeted (fusion or cognitive) biopsies of suspicious area (at mpMRI or transrectal ultrasound). Saturation biopsies are optional in all settings. The optimal strategy for reducing infection complications is still a controversial topic and the instruments to reduce them are actually weak. The adoption of Gleason grade groups in adjunction to the Gleason score when reporting prostate biopsy results is advisable. Conclusion: These updated guidelines and recommendations are intended to assist physicians and patients in the decision-making regarding when and how to perform a prostatic biopsy.

  • Prostate cancer
  • prostate biopsy
  • multiparametric MRI
  • MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy
  • transrectal prostate biopsy
  • transperineal prostate biopsy
  • review
  • Received November 16, 2016.
  • Revision received December 16, 2016.
  • Accepted December 20, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 37 (2)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 2
February 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Italian Prostate Biopsies Group: 2016 Updated Guidelines Insights
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Italian Prostate Biopsies Group: 2016 Updated Guidelines Insights
ANDREA FANDELLA, VINCENZO SCATTONI, ANDREA GALOSI, PIETRO PEPE, MICHELANGELO FIORENTINO, CATERINA GAUDIANO, MARCO GIAMPAOLI, ROBERTA GUNELLI, PASQUALE MARTINO, VITTORINO MONTANARO, RODOLFO MONTIRONI, TIZIANA PIERANGELI, ARMANDO STABILE, ALESSANDRO BERTACCINI
Anticancer Research Feb 2017, 37 (2) 413-424;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Italian Prostate Biopsies Group: 2016 Updated Guidelines Insights
ANDREA FANDELLA, VINCENZO SCATTONI, ANDREA GALOSI, PIETRO PEPE, MICHELANGELO FIORENTINO, CATERINA GAUDIANO, MARCO GIAMPAOLI, ROBERTA GUNELLI, PASQUALE MARTINO, VITTORINO MONTANARO, RODOLFO MONTIRONI, TIZIANA PIERANGELI, ARMANDO STABILE, ALESSANDRO BERTACCINI
Anticancer Research Feb 2017, 37 (2) 413-424;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Multiparametric MRI/TRUS Fusion Prostate Biopsy: Advantages of a Transperineal Approach
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • T-cell-based Immunotherapies for Haematological Cancers, Part A: A SWOT Analysis of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) and Bispecific T-Cell Engagers (BiTEs)
  • Pre-treatment Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Does Not Predict Therapy Response to Radiochemotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
  • T-cell-based Immunotherapies for Haematological Cancers, Part B: A SWOT Analysis of Adoptive Cell Therapies
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • prostate cancer
  • prostate biopsy
  • multiparametric MRI
  • MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy
  • transrectal prostate biopsy
  • transperineal prostate biopsy
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2021 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire