Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Enoxacin with UVA Irradiation Induces Apoptosis in the AsPC1 Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Line Through ROS Generation

KOJI NISHI, MEGUMI KATO, SAKI SAKURAI, AYAKO MATSUMOTO, YUMIKO IWASE and NAGAHIKO YUMITA
Anticancer Research November 2017, 37 (11) 6211-6214;
KOJI NISHI
Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: k.nishi{at}hamayaku.ac.jp
MEGUMI KATO
Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SAKI SAKURAI
Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AYAKO MATSUMOTO
Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YUMIKO IWASE
Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
NAGAHIKO YUMITA
Laboratory of Drug Metabolism and Pharmacotherapeutics, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Yokohama University of Pharmacy, Kanagawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest human cancers. In the current study, we investigated the possibility of a new treatment strategy using a combination of the new fluoroquinolone, enoxacin, and mild ultraviolet A (UVA) irradiation. Enoxacin with UVA irradiation increased the number of annexin V-positive (apoptotic) pancreatic cancer cells in time- and concentration-dependent manners, whereas alone neither had these effects. In addition, enoxacin with UVA irradiation induced cleavage of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase in AsPC1 human pancreatic cancer cells. Moreover, the singlet oxygen scavengers, histidine and sodium azide, and the hydroxyl radical scavenger, mannitol, significantly suppressed apoptosis induced by enoxacin and UVA irradiation, respectively. These results suggest that UVA irradiation activates enoxacin, after which activated enoxacin induces apoptosis of AsPC1 cells through generation of reactive oxygen species. Therefore, the combination of enoxacin with mild UVA irradiation may be a useful method for treating pancreatic cancer.

  • Apoptosis
  • enoxacin
  • pancreatic cancer
  • AsPC1

Pancreatic cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Japan. Although the standard chemotherapy regimens, FOLFIRINOX (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin), gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, are widely used to treat patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, their antitumor effects (progression and survival rates) are less potent against this cancer type than other solid tumors (1, 2).

The most common form of ultraviolet (UV) radiation is sunlight, which produces three main types of radiation according to their wavelength: UVA, UVB, and UVC; UVA constitutes 95% of the radiation that reaches the Earth's surface. Although UVA and UVB are well-known human carcinogens (3-5), UVA is a much weaker form of UV radiation and is therefore less harmful. In fact, Kimura et al. reported that UVA did not induce apoptosis of cancer cells even when the dose was increased to 200 J/m2 (6). On the other hand, UVA causes photoallergic reactions in patients administered fluoroquinolone drugs such as enoxacin, but the mechanism underlying these effects remains unknown (7). We considered the possibility that UVA radiation could be used for the treatment of cancer in the form of photodynamic therapy (PDT). Several drugs have been investigated for their ability to act as photosensitizing agents for PDT; these drugs were found to induce apoptosis of cancer cells (8-10).

In this study, we explored the possibility of whether the novel fluoroquinolone derivative enoxacin might be a candidate photosensitizer for PDT of pancreatic cancer. To this end, we evaluated whether enoxacin induces apoptosis of the pancreatic cancer cell line, AsPC1, under the conditions of mild UVA irradiation, which causes less damage to cells. We then discussed the mechanism and possibility of our results being useful for the development of new therapeutic strategies for pancreatic cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cell culture and reagents. The human pancreatic cancer cell line, AsPC1, was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in the recommended RPMI-1640 medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (Gibco, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 pg/ml streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in 95% humidified air and 5% carbon dioxide at 37°C. Enoxacin was purchased from LKT Laboratories, Inc. (St. Paul, MN, USA). Histidine, mannitol, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) were purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd. (Osaka, Japan). Sodium azide (NaN3) was purchased from Sigma. The other chemicals used were purchased from commercial suppliers.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Induction of apoptosis in AsPC1 cells by enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation as quantified using a MUSE cell analyzer. A: Cells were treated with UVA irradiation with or without 100 μM enoxacin for 10, 20 30 or 40 min. Apoptotic cells were quantified at 4 h after UVA irradiation. B: Cells were treated with or without 100 μM enoxacin under UVA irradiation for 20 min. Apoptotic cells were quantified at 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after UV irradiation. C: Cells were treated without or with 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM enoxacin under 20 min UVA irradiation. Apoptotic cells were quantified at 4 h after UV irradiation. Ds. Western blot of the effects of enoxacin (0, 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM) with UVA irradiation on poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) cleavage. AsPC1 cells were treated with 100 μM enoxacin and 20 min UVA irradiation, and then quantified at 4 h after UV irradiation. Cell lysates were then analyzed by western blotting to detect levels of total and cleaved PARP, as described in the Materials and Methods. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was detected to indicate the relative amounts of loaded proteins. The results shown are representative of three independent experiments. Statistically different at #p<0.05, ##p<0.01, and ###p<0.005 compared to the control, and at *p<0.05, **p<0.05 and ***p<0.001 compared to values at 12.5, 25 and 50 μM enoxacin, respectively.

UVA irradiation. UVA irradiation of cells was performed using six parallel FL20SBLB fluorescent lamps (Toshiba, Tokyo, Japan) with a peak emission frequency of 352 nm at a distance of approximately 20 cm. The irradiation intensity was measured using a radiometer (UVR-305/365; Toshiba, Kanagawa, Japan), which was placed at the same distance from the UVA source as the cells. UVA irradiation was applied for 10 min to 40 min in the presence of 100 μM enoxacin.

Annexin V and dead cell assay. Live and apoptotic cell numbers were determined using the MUSE Annexin V and Dead Cell Kit (Merck Millipore KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 2.0×105 cells/well in 6-well plates. After 12 h, enoxacin was added to each well to a final concentration of 100 μM and the cells were then exposed to UVA for 10 to 40 min or not, then incubated in a CO2 incubator for different periods of time (0, 2, 4 and 6 h) before analysis. The cells were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, trypsinized, and mixed with reagents from the Muse Annexin V and Dead Cell Assay Kit. A MUSE Cell Analyzer was used for data acquisition and analysis; assays were conducted in triplicate.

Western blot analysis. Cells were seeded at a density of 5.0×105 cells/well in 6-well plates. After 12 h, 100 μM enoxacin was added to each well and then cells were exposed to UVA or not then incubated in a CO2 incubator for 4 h. The cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline and then lysed with RIPA buffer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA, USA) containing a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA, USA). Aliquots of protein (30-40 μg) were then resolved on 12% gels, transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane, and incubated with primary antibodies specific to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP, 1:1,000 dilution), cleaved PARP (1:1000 dilution), and to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, 1:10,000 dilution) (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Beverly, MA, USA) for 1 h. Then the membrane was washed and incubated with enzyme-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. Finally, proteins were detected using a chemiluminescence reagent (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ, USA).

Effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers. To determine whether ROS, including singlet oxygen, superoxide radicals and hydroxyl radicals, were involved in the induction of apoptosis by enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation, the effects of ROS scavengers on apoptosis were investigated(11, 12). Briefly, cells were seeded at a density of 2.0×105 cells/well in 6-well plates. After 12 h, 100 μM enoxacin and individual scavenger (100 μM histidine, 100 μM NaN3, 150 unit/ml SOD and 100 μM mannitol) were added to each well and the cells were then exposed to UVA or not then incubated in a CO2 incubator for 4 h. The cells were then washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, trypsinized, and mixed with reagents from the Muse Annexin V and Dead Cell Assay Kit. A MUSE Cell Analyzer was used for data acquisition and analysis; assays were conducted in triplicate.

Statistical analysis. Statistical analyses of differences were performed by one-way ANOVA followed by a modified Fisher's least square difference method.

Results

Effects of enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation on apoptosis. To investigate the effects of enoxacin with or without UVA irradiation on apoptosis of AsPC1 cells, cells were treated with 100 μM enoxacin for 4 h after UVA irradiation for 10, 20, 30, and 40 min (Figure 1A). Enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation increased apoptotic (annexin V-positive) cells in a time-dependent manner. We also investigated the effects of incubation time on apoptosis by treating cells with 100 μM enoxacin and incubating them in a CO2 incubator for 0, 2, 4, and 6 h after 20 min UVA irradiation (Figure 1B). Although treatment with UVA irradiation or enoxacin alone had little effect on apoptosis, even up to an incubation time of 6 h, enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation significantly increased annexin V-positive cells 2 h after UVA irradiation. At 6 h after UVA irradiation, annexin V-positive cells were increased by up to 64%. In addition, these effects were also concentration-dependent (Figure 1C). Moreover, the combined treatment induced PARP cleavage (Figure 1D). These results demonstrated that enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation induced apoptosis of AsPC1 cells in time- and concentration-dependent manners.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Effects of reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavengers on apoptosis induction in AsPC1 cells. Cells were treated without or with 12.5, 25, 50, and 100 μM enoxacin under 20 min UVA irradiation. Treated cells at 4 h after UV irradiation were applied for the experiment. The value of each bar indicates the mean of three independent experiments. His: Histidine; Man: mannitol; SOD: superoxide dismutase.

Effects of ROS scavengers on apoptosis. To determine whether ROS were involved in the induction of apoptosis by enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation, we examined the effects of ROS scavengers on apoptosis (Figure 2). Histidine and NaN3, scavengers of singlet oxygen, significantly suppressed apoptosis induced by enoxacin and UVA irradiation. Mannitol, a scavenger of hydroxy radical, also slightly suppressed apoptosis. In contrast, SOD did not appear to affect the induction of apoptosis.

Discussion

In this study, we explored the effects of enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation on human pancreatic cancer cells. Treatment with enoxacin alone did not induce apoptosis, and had little effect on cellular proliferation until 72 h (data not shown). These results indicate that enoxacin does not have antitumor or cytotoxic activity. UVA irradiation alone also did not induce apoptosis of AspC1 cells, thereby demonstrating that UVA irradiation alone was mild enough not to damage the cells. Interestingly, UVA irradiation in the presence of enoxacin significantly induced apoptosis of AsPC1 cells. This apoptosis induction was considered to be due to some form of UVA activation of enoxacin because apoptosis was observed in UVA irradiation time-dependent and enoxacin concentration-dependent manners, whereas UVA alone did not have any effect up to 40 min.

How is enoxacin activated by UVA irradiation? Previously, the phototoxicity of another new quinolone was thought to be due to ROS generation by UV exposure; however, the details underlying this remain unknown (13). Therefore, we investigated the effects of histidine and NaN3 as scavengers of singlet oxygen, mannitol as a scavenger of hydroxy radical, and SOD as a scavenger of superoxide anion on apoptosis induced by enoxacin with UVA irradiation (11, 12). Histindine and NaN3 significantly suppressed apoptosis induced by enoxacin combined with UVA irradiation, suggesting the involvement of singlet oxygen. The effects of mannitol and SOD were weak and not observed respectively. These results indicate that the induction of apoptosis in AsPC1 cells by enoxacin with UVA irradiation mainly involves ROS, especially singlet oxygen.

The results of this study suggest that the combination of enoxacin with UVA irradiation may be a useful method for treating pancreatic cancer. Future experiments are needed to determine if other quinolones may also have therapeutic effects against this disease.

  • Received August 7, 2017.
  • Revision received August 25, 2017.
  • Accepted August 29, 2017.
  • Copyright© 2017, International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. George J. Delinasios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Conroy T,
    2. Desseigne F,
    3. Ychou M,
    4. Bouche O,
    5. Guimbaud R,
    6. Becouarn Y,
    7. Adenis A,
    8. Raoul JL,
    9. Gourgou-Bourgade S,
    10. de la Fouchardiere C,
    11. Bennouna J,
    12. Bachet JB,
    13. Khemissa-Akouz F,
    14. Pere-Verge D,
    15. Delbaldo C,
    16. Assenat E,
    17. Chauffert B,
    18. Michel P,
    19. Montoto-Grillot C,
    20. Ducreux M
    : Folfirinox versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med 364(19): 1817-1825, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Von Hoff DD,
    2. Ervin T,
    3. Arena FP,
    4. Chiorean EG,
    5. Infante J,
    6. Moore M,
    7. Seay T,
    8. Tjulandin SA,
    9. Ma WW,
    10. Saleh MN,
    11. Harris M,
    12. Reni M,
    13. Dowden S,
    14. Laheru D,
    15. Bahary N,
    16. Ramanathan RK,
    17. Tabernero J,
    18. Hidalgo M,
    19. Goldstein D,
    20. Van Cutsem E,
    21. Wei X,
    22. Iglesias J,
    23. Renschler MF
    : Increased survival in pancreatic cancer with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine. N Engl J Med 369(18): 1691-1703, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Burger PM,
    2. Simons JW
    : Mutagenicity and carcinogenicity of 8-MOP/UVA in cell cultures. Bull Cancer 65(3): 281-282, 1978.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Epstein JH
    : Photocarcinogenesis, skin cancer, and aging. J Am Acad Dermatol 9(4): 487-502, 1983.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Nishisgori C
    : Current concept of photocarcinogenesis. Photochem Photobiol Sci 14(9): 1713-1721, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Kimura H,
    2. Lee C,
    3. Hayashi K,
    4. Yamauchi K,
    5. Yamamoto N,
    6. Tsuchiya H,
    7. Tomita K,
    8. Bouvet M,
    9. Hoffman RM
    : UV light killing efficacy of fluorescent protein-expressing cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biochem 110(6): 1439-1446, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Kawabe Y,
    2. Mizuno N,
    3. Sakakibara S
    : Photoallergic reaction caused by enoxacin. Photodermatol 6(1): 57-59, 1989.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Chen YK,
    2. Senadi GC,
    3. Lee CH,
    4. Tsai YM,
    5. Chen YR,
    6. Hu WP,
    7. Chou YW,
    8. Kuo KK,
    9. Wang JJ
    : Apoptosis induced by 2-aryl benzothiazole-mediated photodynamic therapy in melanomas via mitochondrial dysfunction. Chem Res Toxicol 27(7): 1187-1198, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Finlan LE,
    2. Kernohan NM,
    3. Thomson G,
    4. Beattie PE,
    5. Hupp TR,
    6. Ibbotson SH
    : Differential effects of 5-aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy and psoralen + ultraviolet a therapy on p53 phosphorylation in normal human skin in vivo. Br J Dermatol 153(5): 1001-1010, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Tringali G,
    2. Sampaolese B,
    3. Clementi ME
    : Expression of early and late cellular damage markers by ARPE-19 cells following prolonged treatment with UV-A radiation. Mol Med Rep 14(4): 3485-3489, 2016.
    OpenUrl
  9. ↵
    1. Hachimine K,
    2. Shibaguchi H,
    3. Kuroki M,
    4. Yamada H,
    5. Kinugasa T,
    6. Nakae Y,
    7. Asano R,
    8. Sakata I,
    9. Yamashita Y,
    10. Shirakusa T,
    11. Kuroki M
    : Sonodynamic therapy of cancer using a novel porphyrin derivative, DCPH-p-Na(i), which is devoid of photosensitivity. Cancer Sci 98(6): 916-920, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Li B,
    2. Gutierrez PL,
    3. Amstad P,
    4. Blough NV
    : Hydroxyl radical production by mouse epidermal cell lines in the presence of quinone anti-cancer compounds. Chem Res Toxicol 12(11): 1042-1049, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Jantova S,
    2. Mrvova N,
    3. Hudec R,
    4. Sedlak J,
    5. Panik M,
    6. Milata V
    : Pro-apoptotic effect of new quinolone 7-ethyl 9-ethyl-6-oxo-6,9-dihydro[1,2,5]selenadiazolo [3,4-h]quinoline-7-carboxylate on cervical cancer cell line HeLa alone/with uva irradiation. Toxicol In Vitro 33: 35-44, 2016.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 37, Issue 11
November 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Enoxacin with UVA Irradiation Induces Apoptosis in the AsPC1 Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Line Through ROS Generation
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Enoxacin with UVA Irradiation Induces Apoptosis in the AsPC1 Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Line Through ROS Generation
KOJI NISHI, MEGUMI KATO, SAKI SAKURAI, AYAKO MATSUMOTO, YUMIKO IWASE, NAGAHIKO YUMITA
Anticancer Research Nov 2017, 37 (11) 6211-6214;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Enoxacin with UVA Irradiation Induces Apoptosis in the AsPC1 Human Pancreatic Cancer Cell Line Through ROS Generation
KOJI NISHI, MEGUMI KATO, SAKI SAKURAI, AYAKO MATSUMOTO, YUMIKO IWASE, NAGAHIKO YUMITA
Anticancer Research Nov 2017, 37 (11) 6211-6214;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Apoptosis Induced by Ultraviolet A Exposure in the Presence of Enoxacin in HL-60 Cells
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Fosnetupitant Versus Fosaprepitant for Delayed Vomiting Upon Irinotecan–Oxaliplatin Combination Chemotherapy for Pancreatic/Colorectal Cancer
  • MMP-9 Genotypes Serve as Oral Cancer Predictive Marker for Smokers
  • A RANKL-derived Peptide Inhibits RSPO3-LGR4-Wnt Signaling and Lung Adenocarcinoma in Mice
Show more Experimental Studies

Keywords

  • apoptosis
  • enoxacin
  • Pancreatic cancer
  • AsPC1
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire