Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Outcome and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosed on Operative Hysteroscopic Resection Specimens

JULIA AUMIPHIN, PATRICE CROCHET, SOPHIE KNIGHT, XAVIER CARCOPINO, LUDOVIC CRAVELLO, LEON BOUBLI and AUBERT AGOSTINI
Anticancer Research August 2016, 36 (8) 4341-4345;
JULIA AUMIPHIN
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital La Conception, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PATRICE CROCHET
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital La Conception, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SOPHIE KNIGHT
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital La Conception, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
XAVIER CARCOPINO
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LUDOVIC CRAVELLO
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital La Conception, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
LEON BOUBLI
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AUBERT AGOSTINI
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital La Conception, Marseille, France
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: aubert.agostini{at}ap-hm.fr
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To study outcomes of patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma (EC) after histological analysis of endometrial resections retrieved during operative hysteroscopy performed for a presumed benign lesion. Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using medical records of patients who underwent operative hysteroscopy for a presumed benign lesion with a final diagnosis of EC between January 1994 and April 2014 in two tertiary academic centers. Results: A total of 29 patients were selected. International federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) classification was distributed as follows: 16 stages IA, 7 stages IB, 4 stages II and 2 stages III. Peritoneal cytology was positive in one case (stage IIIA). Median follow-up was 4.2 years (range=0.3-20.51). Two deaths were observed and were attributed to endometrial cancer. Conclusion: Operative hysteroscopy does not appear to influence stage of EC nor cause retrograde seeding of EC for 27/29 (93%) patients. For 2 patients, the impact of operative hysteroscopy remains uncertain.

  • Surgical hysteroscopy
  • endometrial cancer
  • endometrial adenocarcinoma
  • prognosis of endometrial cancer
  • peritoneal cytology

Endometrial cancer is diagnosed on endometrial tissue obtained by blind sampling or by hysteroscopy (1). A number of studies report inconsistent results regarding the risk of positive peritoneal cytology and potential dissemination of the disease (2). Nevertheless, the impact of peritoneal cytology after diagnostic hysteroscopy on long-term survival and the risk of recurrence has yet to be evaluated (2-4). There are, however, very few studies evaluating the impact of operative hysteroscopy performed for a presumed benign lesion with a final diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma (5). The main differences between operative and diagnostic hysteroscopy are, for operative hysteroscopy, longer operative times, use of higher intrauterine perfusion pressures and ability to perform surgical procedures. Although this situation is less frequent, it is important to evaluate the risk of retrograde seeding of endometrial cancer during operative hysteroscopy. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed on endometrial resections obtained during an operative hysteroscopy performed for a presumed benign lesion.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective bicentric study was conducted in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department of two academic hospitals (Hôpital La Conception and Hôpital Nord) in Marseille, France, between January 1994 and December 2014. The inclusion criteria were as follows: a preoperative sonography showing no suspicion of malignancy, an operative hysteroscopy for a presumed benign lesion with a final pathological diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Medical records were selected using the DIM (Département d'information médical). Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for this study (no.CEROG-2014-GYN-0905) and all patients gave their informed consent to participate.

During this period, the operative technique was identical in both hospitals. All patients underwent an operative hysteroscopy under general anesthesia. Operative hysteroscopy was performed after cervical dilation with Hank dilators, using an 8- or 9-mm hysteroscopic resectoscope and a 5-mm loop electrode. The uterine cavity was distended using a glycine solution with a continuous monitoring of intake and output. Monopolar energy was used. Resection was performed after having excluded a suspected malignant lesion. Suspicious features of the endometrium suggesting endometrial carcinoma were defined by at least one of the following criteria: irregular or papillary surface, evidence of necrosis, irregular vessel pattern (6, 7). All patients diagnosed with endometrial carcinoma after pathological analysis underwent preoperative imaging (magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) scan). This preoperative imaging guided the decision concerning the therapeutic strategy established during a multidisciplinary meeting. After histopathological analysis, the disease was staged using the 2009 international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) classification (7-9). Staging for patients who were operated before 2009 was updated using the revised 2009 FIGO criteria (10).

Information regarding patients' characteristics, initial treatment, histological characteristics and subsequent follow-up were collected from medical records. Information concerning patients lost to follow-up or who were followed up outside the department was collected from medical records held by the patient's general practitioner. In case of death, the year and cause of death were collected. Results are presented as mean±standard deviation and median values (minimum-maximum).

Results

During the study period, a total of 6,104 operative hysteroscopies were performed and 29 patients met the inclusion criteria. Median age was 62 years (range=48-72). Twenty-seven (93.1%) patients had a menopausal status. A hormonal replacement treatment was reported in 8 (27.6%) cases. Mean follow-up was 6.44±6.18 years.

All patients consulted for pre- or postmenopausal bleeding. Median duration of operative hysteroscopy was 15 minutes (range=4-60) and median volume of glycine solution used was 2 liters (range=0.3-11). Hysteroscopic procedure performed was a resection of an intrauterine lesion for 5 patients (17.2%), a total endometrectomy for 8 patients (27.6%) and both for 16 patients (55.2%). The pathological results of the lesion resected or total endometrectomy comprised: 21 endometrioïd carcinomas (72.4%), 2 clear-cell adenocarcinomas (6.9%), 4 mucinous adenocarcinomas (13.8%) and 2 papillary serous carcinomas (6.9%). A total of 25/29 (86.2%) type 1 histotypes and 4/29 (13.8%) type 2 histotypes were observed.

Following cancer diagnosis, all patients underwent surgical treatment consisting of a total hysterectomy with a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy after preoperative imaging (MRI or CT scan). Lymphadenectomy was performed depending on the stage, patient's age and operability (obesity, comorbidities). Mean time between operative hysteroscopy and surgery was 35.3±19.9 days.

FIGO classification status according to the final histopathology report was distributed as follows: 16 stage IA, 7 stage IB, 4 stage II and 2 stage III patients (7). There was only 1/29 positive peritoneal cytology (3.4%) and 1/29 positive pelvic lymph node (3.4%). Peritoneal cytologies and lymphadenectomies performed for stage I and II patients were all negative.

Outcomes of stage IA patients. Post-operative histopathological analysis revealed 16 patients presenting a FIGO stage IA disease: 8 of these tumors were grade 1 (including 7 endometrioid carcinomas and 1 mucinous adenocarcinoma), 5 were grade 2 (including 4 endometrioid carcinomas and 1 mucinous adenocarcinoma). There was one grade 3 (endometrioid carcinoma) and 2 clear-cell carcinomas.

All patients underwent surgery during the initial phase of treatment. A pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed in 8 cases. For both patients with a clear-cell carcinoma a surgical treatment equivalent to ovarian cancer was performed. Seven patients underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. No patient received adjuvant chemotherapy. All patients were alive during the follow-up period, except one patient who died 7 years after initial treatment of gastric cancer.

Outcomes of stage IB patients. All 7 patients presenting with stage 1B endometrial cancer received surgical treatment followed by radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Four of these patients had a grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma and all of them were alive during the follow-up period. One patient had a mucinous adenocarcinoma (grade 1). She died 3.7 years later from another cause (heart failure). One patient had a grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma. She was alive at 1.9 years follow-up. The last patient presented a papillary serous carcinoma (type 2). She died 12 years later of breast cancer.

Outcomes of stage II patients. Treatment and outcomes for stage II patients are detailed in Table I.

Outcomes of stage III patients. There was one stage IIIA and one stage IIIC1 patient. The stage IIIA patient was a non-menopausal patient aged 48 who underwent a 15-min endometrectomy that enabled the diagnosis of a grade 1 endometrioid carcinoma. The preoperative MRI classified her as a presumed stage FIGO IA. Fourteen days later, she underwent a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. The final histopathological analysis revealed a grade 2 endometrioid carcinoma with myometrial invasion >50%, an invasion of the serosa and adnexas, a positive peritoneal cytology and no lymphovascular invasion or nodal involvement. She received chemotherapy and radiotherapy and died two years later from disease. The stage IIIC1 patient, aged 60, underwent a 20-min endometrectomy that enabled the diagnosis of a grade 1 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. The preoperative MRI classified her as a presumed stage FIGO IB. She underwent the same surgical treatment as described for the previous patient 31 days after endometrectomy. Pathological analysis revealed a grade 1 endometriod adenocarcinoma with a myometrial invasion >50%, lymphovascular invasion, 3 metastatic pelvic nodes and a negative peritoneal cytology. She received radiotherapy and brachytherapy and is still alive with no recurrence 19 years later.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Patients with international federation of gynecology and obstetrics (FIGO) stage II (FIGO 2009).

Two patients died from endometrial cancer, 1 was stage IIIA and 1 stage II. The stage II patient was a 70-year-old and underwent a polyp resection that lasted 10 minutes. Analysis of hysteroscopic resection products revealed a papillary serous carcinoma. She underwent, 23 days later, a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, pelvic and aortic lymphadenectomy and an omentectomy. The pathologic results revealed a grade 2 papillary serous carcinoma with myometrial invasion >50%, lymphovascular invasion, isthmus and endocervix invasion. There were 0/12 involved lymph nodes and peritoneal cytology was negative. She received radiotherapy but refused brachytherapy. A recurrence occurred 4 years later consisting of a 7-cm metastatic iliac lymph node. She died from endometrial cancer after a median follow-up of 5 years. Three other patients died of other causes during the follow-up period: stomach cancer, breast cancer and end-stage heart failure.

Discussion

This study reports a series of 29 patients for which the definitive pathological results was an endometrial carcinoma diagnosed on endometrial resection specimens retrieved during an operative hysteroscopy performed for a presumed benign lesion. In all cases, pre-operative clinical examination ultrasound and hysteroscopy had not showed any signs of malignancy. The final staging found 16 stage IA, 7 stage IB, 4 stage II, 1 stage IIIA and 1 stage IIIC endometrial cancers. Peritoneal cytology was negative in 28/29 patients (96.5%). There were 2 FIGO stage III patients. Both patients underwent MRI after the diagnosis that reported no signs of poor prognosis and no extra-uterine invasion. In one of these two cases peritoneal cytology was positive.

This is a small series but, to our knowledge, this is the largest series of patients with endometrial cancer diagnosed during an operative hysteroscopy performed for a presumed benign lesion. Vilos et al. published a series of 19 patients who underwent operative hysteroscopy between 1990 and 2005 (5). In 16 of these women, prehysteroscopy office endometrial biopsy was not done, was impossible to perform, provided inadequate sample or was reported as proliferative endometrium or endometrial hyperplasia. All patients underwent a partial or complete hysteroscopic endometrial resection. Endometrial cancer was diagnosed after pathological examination of endometrial resections. All 16 patients underwent the standard treatment for endometrial cancer. Follow-up ranged from 1 to 14 years and there were no recurrences. The rate of positive peritoneal washings was not specified in the study. Three patients died from causes that were not related to their endometrial disease, 13 patients were still alive with no recurrence. A pilot study on operative hysteroscopy in endometrial cancer was conducted in 2006, including 35 patients (10). The objective was to evaluate accuracy of endometrial biopsy (2 to 4) by means of hysteroscopic resectoscope for the evaluation of tumor differentiation (grade) in endometrial cancer. The aim was to optimize surgical treatment by improving characterization of the tumor (histology, grade). After definitive pathological examination of the hysterectomy specimen, tumor grade was concordant in 97.1% cases. None of the patients had positive peritoneal cytologies.

In our study, there was only one positive peritoneal cytology; a stage IIIA patient. This positive cytology could be subsequent to retrograde seeding but, considering the other locations of the disease, it is likely that it could result from spontaneous dissemination. The malignant potential of disseminated tumor cells during hysteroscopy is debated and a number of studies report conflicting results; however, these studies concern diagnostic hysteroscopy alone (11-13). Nevertheless, its implication in endometrial cancer remains controversial (3, 4).

Regarding the stage IIIC1 patient, a nodal involvement was found, although myometrial invasion was minimal. The implication of operative hysteroscopy in her nodal involvement is questionable. It is theoretically possible that tumor cells could disseminate though the vascular or lymphatic system. Inflammatory and cicatricial processes could potentially be responsible of a faster dissemination in the lymphatic system (14, 15).

There is also a potential risk of local dissemination after resections (16). The stage IIIA patient underwent pelvic ultrasound examination, that reported no abnormality, followed by a preoperative operative hysteroscopy and MRI classifying her FIGO stage IA. However, the definitive pathological examination of the hysterectomy specimen revealed an invasion of >50% of the myometrium and a tumor spread to the adnexa. For the stage IIIC patient, pelvic ultrasound examination was normal but the preoperative MRI classified her stage IB. The implication of intrauterine perfusion pressure has been evaluated. Baker and Adamson reported that there was no spill into the peritoneal cavity when perfusion pressure was maintained under 70 mmHg (17).

In our series, 2/29 patients (7%) were finally diagnosed as stage III, although there was no evidence of malignant lesions neither after ultrasound examination nor hysteroscopy. An explanation could be that both patients had an advanced stage of endometrial cancer and ultrasonography underestimated the malignant nature and particularly myometrial invasion. Indeed, ultrasound is effective for detection of adenocarcinomas but not for evaluating myometrial invasion (18-20).

In conclusion, operative hysteroscopy was not associated with a positive peritoneal cytology for 27/29 patients (93%). Influence of operative hysteroscopy for these patients remains uncertain. For both patients that were finally classified stage III, a correct staging, before operative hysteroscopy and implication of operative hysteroscopy in the dissemination of the disease, could be considered. Various mechanisms could explain this dissemination. One of them could be retrograde tubal dissemination as reported for diagnostic hysteroscopy for which the prognostic impact is debated. However, other mechanisms, such as hyperpressure or post-resection processes, could be responsible for myometrial and lymphatic dissemination.

  • Received May 21, 2016.
  • Revision received June 12, 2016.
  • Accepted June 14, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Burke WM,
    2. Orr J,
    3. Leitao M,
    4. Salom E,
    5. Gehrig P,
    6. Olawaiye A,
    7. Brewer M,
    8. Boruta D,
    9. Herzog TJ,
    10. Shahin FA
    : Endometrial cancer: A review and current management strategies: Part I. Gynecol Oncol 134: 393-402, 2014. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24929052
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Wethington SL,
    2. Barrena Medel NI,
    3. Wright JD,
    4. Herzog TJ
    : Prognostic significance and treatment implications of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial adenocarcinoma: Unraveling a mystery. Gynecol Oncol 115: 18-25, 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19632708
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Takeshima N,
    2. Nishida H,
    3. Tabata T,
    4. Hirai Y,
    5. Hasumi K
    : Positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer: enhancement of other prognostic indicators. Gynecol Oncol 82: 470-473, 2001. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11520142
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sáinz de la Cuesta R,
    2. Espinosa JA,
    3. Crespo E,
    4. Granizo JJ,
    5. Rivas F
    : Does fluid hysteroscopy increase the stage or worsen the prognosis in patients with endometrial cancer? A randomized controlled trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 115: 211-215, 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15262358
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Vilos GA,
    2. Edris F,
    3. Al-Mubarak A,
    4. Ettler HC,
    5. Hollett-Caines J,
    6. Abu-Rafea B
    : Hysteroscopic surgery does not adversely affect the long-term prognosis of women with endometrial adenocarcinoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 14: 205-210, 2007. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17368258
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Dueholm M,
    2. Hjorth IMD,
    3. Secher P,
    4. Jørgensen A,
    5. Ørtoft G
    : Structured Hysteroscopic Evaluation of Endometrium in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 22: 1215-1224, 2015. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26140830
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Nappi C,
    2. Di Spiezio Sardo A
    : Endometrial Carcinoma in State of the art Hysteroscopic approaches to pathologies of the genital tract. Endo Press, Tuttligen, Germany: 2014.
    1. Bramante S,
    2. Guida M,
    3. Sparice S,
    4. Lavitola G,
    5. Pellicano M,
    6. Acunzo G,
    7. Cirillo P,
    8. Nappi C
    : Hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma. Tumori (suppl 4): 237-238, 2003. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12903604
  8. ↵
    1. Mutch D
    : I231 FIGO Staging of Endometrial Cancer 2009. Int J Gynecol Obstet 107: 58,2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(09)60231-9
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Creasman W
    : Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the endometrium. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 105: 109, 2009. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19345353
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Preyer O,
    2. Obermair A,
    3. Formann E,
    4. Schmid W,
    5. Perrin LC,
    6. Ward BG,
    7. Crandon AJ,
    8. Nicklin JL
    : The Impact of Positive Peritoneal Washings and Serosal and Adnexal Involvement on Survival in Patients with Stage IIIA Uterine Cancer. Gynecol Oncol 86: 269-273, 2002. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12217747
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Biewenga P,
    2. de Blok S,
    3. Birnie E
    : Does diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma cause positive peritoneal washings? Gynecol Oncol 93: 194-198, 2004. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15047235
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Arikan G,
    2. Reich O,
    3. Weiss U,
    4. Hahn T,
    5. Reinisch S,
    6. Tamussino K,
    7. PickeL H,
    8. Desoye G
    : Are endometrial carcinoma cells disseminated at hysteroscopy functionally viable? Gynecol Oncol 83: 221-226, 2001. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11606075
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. van Zijl F,
    2. Krupitza G,
    3. Mikulits W
    : Initial steps of metastasis: cell invasion and endothelial transmigration. Mutat Res 728: 23-24, 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21605699
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Takac I,
    2. Zegura B
    : Office hysteroscopy and the risk of microscopic extrauterine spread in endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 107: 94-98, 2007. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17610939
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Obermair A,
    2. Geramou M,
    3. Gucer F,
    4. Denison U,
    5. Graf AH,
    6. Ph D,
    7. Kapshammer E,
    8. Neunteufel W,
    9. Frech I,
    10. Kaider A,
    11. Sc M,
    12. Kainz C
    : Does Hysteroscopy Facilitate Tumor Cell Dissemination? Incidence of Peritoneal Cytology from Patients with Early Stage Endometrial Carcinoma following Dilatation and Curettage (D & C) versus Hysteroscopy and D & C. Am Cancer Soc 88: 139-143, 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10618616
    OpenUrl
  15. ↵
    1. Baker VL,
    2. Adamson GD
    : Threshold intrauterine perfusion pressures for intraperitoneal spill during hydrotubation and correlation with tubal adhesive disease. Fertil Steril 64: 1066-1069, 1995. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7589653
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Yazbeck C,
    2. Poncelet C,
    3. Créquat J,
    4. Madelenat P
    : Intérêt de l'échographie endovaginale préopératoire dans l'évaluation de l'infiltration myométriale des adénocarcinomes de l'endomètre. Gynécologie Obs Fertil 31: 1024-1029, 2003. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14680783
    OpenUrl
    1. Epstein E,
    2. Blomqvist L
    : Imaging in endometrial cancer. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 28: 721-739, 2014. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24852891
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  17. ↵
    1. Zarbo G,
    2. Caruso G,
    3. Caruso S,
    4. Mangano U,
    5. Zarbo R
    : Endometrial cancer: preoperative evaluation of myometrial infiltration magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasonography. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 21: 95-97, 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10726632
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Soucie JE,
    2. Chu PA,
    3. Ross S,
    4. Snodgrass T,
    5. Wood SL
    : The risk of diagnostic hysteroscopy in women with endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 207: 71.e1-5, 2012. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22621816
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hirai Y,
    2. Takeshima N,
    3. Kato T,
    4. Hasumi K
    : Malignant potential of positive peritoneal cytology in endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 97: 725-728, 2001. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11339924
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Chang Y-N,
    2. Zhang Y,
    3. Wang Y-J,
    4. Wang L-P,
    5. Duan H
    : Effect of hysteroscopy on the peritoneal dissemination of endometrial cancer cells: a meta-analysis. Fertil Steril 96: 957-961, 2011. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21872230
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Garg G,
    2. Gao F,
    3. Wright JD,
    4. Hagemann AR,
    5. Mutch DG,
    6. Powell M
    : A Positive peritoneal cytology is an independent risk-factor in early stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 128: 77-82, 2013. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23032094
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Zerbe MJ,
    2. Zhang J,
    3. Bristow RE,
    4. Grumbine FC,
    5. Abularach S,
    6. Montz FJ
    : Retrograde seeding of malignant cells during hysteroscopy in presumed early endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 79: 55-58, 2000. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11006031
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 8
August 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outcome and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosed on Operative Hysteroscopic Resection Specimens
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Outcome and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosed on Operative Hysteroscopic Resection Specimens
JULIA AUMIPHIN, PATRICE CROCHET, SOPHIE KNIGHT, XAVIER CARCOPINO, LUDOVIC CRAVELLO, LEON BOUBLI, AUBERT AGOSTINI
Anticancer Research Aug 2016, 36 (8) 4341-4345;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Outcome and Follow-up of Patients with Endometrial Carcinoma Diagnosed on Operative Hysteroscopic Resection Specimens
JULIA AUMIPHIN, PATRICE CROCHET, SOPHIE KNIGHT, XAVIER CARCOPINO, LUDOVIC CRAVELLO, LEON BOUBLI, AUBERT AGOSTINI
Anticancer Research Aug 2016, 36 (8) 4341-4345;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-institutional Real-world Study
  • Cytoreductive Surgery With or Without Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Spread from Appendiceal Neoplasms and Cancers
  • Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Four-arm Comparative Study
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Surgical hysteroscopy
  • Endometrial cancer
  • Endometrial adenocarcinoma
  • prognosis of endometrial cancer
  • peritoneal cytology
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire