Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Circulating Growth and Angiogenic Factors and Lymph Node Status in Early-stage Breast Cancer – A Pilot Study

MARIE KARLIKOVA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, ANDREA NARSANSKA, RADEK KUCERA, INKA TRESKOVA and VLADISLAV TRESKA
Anticancer Research August 2016, 36 (8) 4209-4214;
MARIE KARLIKOVA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: karlikovam@fnplzen.cz
ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ANDREA NARSANSKA
2Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RADEK KUCERA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
INKA TRESKOVA
2Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VLADISLAV TRESKA
2Department of Surgery, Faculty Hospital in Pilsen, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the possibility of selected biomarkers for breast cancer diagnostics and/or treatment monitoring, lymph node (LN) status determination and clinical decision regarding axillary node dissection. Patients and Methods: Two hundred and eleven patients with malignant breast cancer and 42 age-matched healthy controls were enrolled. Serum insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1) and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3) and plasma epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and osteopontin (OPN) were measured. We compared patients versus controls, patients with negative versus positive lymph node and patients with and without axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). Results: We found elevated IGF1 and VEGF levels in patients with lymph node metastases compared to controls (p=0.0179 and p=0.0091, respectively) and in patients with ALND (p=0.0337 and p=0.0438, respectively). Conclusion: Circulating IGF1 and VEGF levels may predict the presence of lymph node metastases and help in the decision to avoid ALND in patients with early-stage breast cancer.

  • Breast cancer
  • biomarkers
  • IGF1
  • VEGF
  • lymph node status
  • axillary lymph node dissection

Breast cancer is the second most common cancer worldwide and by far the most common cancer diagnosed in women (1). Early diagnosis of breast cancer (tumor size less than 2 cm) is crucial for patient prognosis. It is, therefore, essential to elucidate the etiopathogenesis of early stages of breast cancer for a personalized approach to patients.

The most important prognostic factor in patients with early-stage breast cancer is axillary lymph node status (2). Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has long been the standard of care for patients with lymph node metastases; however, the value of additional axillary dissection is unclear and not all patients benefit from this intervention (3). According to Yi et al. (4), a significant percentage of patients with sentinel node (SN) metastases, particularly those with small, estrogen receptor (ER)–positive cancers and sentinel node micrometastases, have low regional recurrence rates and may safely avoid ALND. Other criteria for the clinical decision concerning ALND are being investigated. Early prediction of lymph node metastasis may facilitate the choice of operation type, as well as use of adjuvant therapy. To determine lymph node status, a histological analysis is performed by selective sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB); this technique is, however, subject of false-negative results in about 8% of cases (5). The factors most generally accepted as predictors of axillary status are tumour size, lymphovascular invasion, histological grade, results of imaging techniques and patient's age. If serum biomarker levels were an additional factor, which can be correlated with the risk of axillary nodal spread, this would offer a simple, risk-free method for predicting lymph node status.

Within the framework of a previous pilot study (6), we investigated serum or plasma levels of six biomarkers that play a role in tumour growth and angiogenesis: insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), epidermal growth factor (EGF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), osteoprotegerin (OPG) and osteopontin (OPN). The aim was to evaluate the possibility of their use as biomarkers for (i) breast cancer diagnostics and/or treatment monitoring, (ii) lymph node status determination and (iii) clinical decision regarding the axillary node dissection.

Patients and Methods

Group of patients. A total of 211 women with histologically verified malignant breast tumour participated in the study, while 42 age-matched healthy women (their case-history excluded any past or present oncological disease) were included as controls. The characteristics of patient group are summarised in Table I.

In the malignant group, 191 patients (91%) had tumour of clinical stage I or II. One hundred and thirty-three patients had negative lymph nodes verified by histology (Group 1) and 78 patients had one or more positive lymph nodes. Forty-seven LN-positive patients had pre-operative sentinel node biopsy and were divided into 2 subgroups: (a) patients with low-risk tumour (estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positivity, grade 1-2, pT1, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase (MIB1) below 30%) where ALND was not performed (Group 2) and (b) patients with high-risk tumour (ER/PR negativity, receptor tyrosine-protein kinase erbB-2 (HER2/neu) negativity, pT2 and more, grade 3, MIB1 over 30%) where ALDN was performed (Group 3). In 31 LN-positive patients, axillary dissection was directly performed without preoperative biopsy because clinical or ultrasonographical examination indicated pathological axillary lymph nodes.

Blood samples were obtained from all subjects at the time of diagnosis and prior to surgery or any other form of treatment (patients) or during a regular examination (conctrols). All women gave informed consent for their samples to be used for research.

Preoperative examination of sentinel node. Sentinel node detection by Gamma Probe and its preoperative exstirpation and histology examination for the presence or absence of metastases were performed.

Postoperative examination of the resected part of the axilla. The resected part of breast tissue and axilla obtained by using ALND were fixed in formalin before transported to the bioptic laboratory for histological examination.

Blood samples. Peripheral venous blood was collected using the VACUETTE blood collection system (Greiner Bio-one Company, Kremsmünster, Austria) in EDTA plasma collection tubes and serum collection tubes. Serum was separated by a 10 minute centrifugation at 1,700 × g, plasma was separated by a 10-minute centrifugation at 1,300 × g. All samples were immediately frozen to −80°C and thawed just prior to analysis.

Biomarkers' assays. Serum levels of IGF1 were measured using an immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) radioisotope IGF1 assay kit (IMMUNOTECH, Marseille, France). Serum levels of IGFBP3 were measured using an IRMA radioisotope IGFBP3 assay kit (DiaSource, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium). Plasma EGF and VEGF levels were assayed using a human cytokine/chemokine magnetic bead panel (Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA), plasma OPG and OPN levels were assayed using a human bone magnetic bead panel (Millipore Corporation), following the protocols set up by the manufacturer. Multiplex measurements were performed using the Bio-Plex MAGPIX Multiplex Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical methods. The SAS 9.2 (Statistical Analysis Software release 9.2; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA) was used for all statistical analyses. The Wilcoxon test was used to compare distributions of values between the groups. The Spearman's rank corellation was used to assess the correlation between investigated parameters.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Characteristics of malignant breast cancer patients.

Results

Serum levels of IGF1 and IGFBP3 were significantly elevated in the group of patients (p=0.0002 and p=0.0209, respectively) (Table II). Plasma VEGF and OPN levels were significantly increased in the patient group (p=0.0172 and p<0.0001, respectively), plasma EGF levels were not significantly increased in the patient group. Plasma OPG levels were significantly decreased in the group of patients (p=0.0064). We observed significant positive correlations between IGF1 and IGFBP3 (r=0.3792, p=0.0009) between OPG and OPN (r=0.2346, p=0.0002) and between EGF and VEGF (r=0.3801, p<0.0001).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Circulating levels of biomarkers in patients with breast cancer and control groups.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Circulating levels of biomarkers by lymph node status.

Only serum IFG1 levels and plasma VEGF levels were significanly elevated both in patients with positive lymph nodes (p=0.0179 and p=0.0091, respectively) and in patients with ALND (p=0.0337 and 0.0438, respectively); other biomarker levels were not changed (Table III).

Discussion

Angiogenesis is an essential process for tumour growth and metastasis and, similarly, lymphangiogenesis is required for the invasion of the lymph vessels and the consequent generation of metastases in the lymph nodes. In this pilot study, we focused on circulating levels of growth, angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis factors as potential biomarkers in early-stage breast cancer.

IGF1 is a multifunctional peptide playing an important role in cellular growth, proliferation, differentiation and cellular transformation and was found to have the ability to induce and promote lymphangiogenesis through induction of VEGF-C (8). Physiological activities of IGF1 are modulated by its association with binding proteins, especially IGFBP3, with this high-affinity binding being thought to have an important limiting effect on the availability of IGF1 for biological activity (9). Serum IGF1 and IGFBP3, in relation with different cancers, have been previously investigated in our laboratory (10, 11) and a positive correlation of serum IGF1 levels with melanoma has been demonstrated. In the presented study, we found serum IGF1 and IGFBP3 levels significantly elevated in malignant breast cancer patients compared to controls. Elevated IGF1 levels in patients are in concordance with IGF1 functions as documented in other studies (12, 13). However, serum IGFBP3 levels in previously published reports are not consistent, a finding that may be related to different characteristics of patient groups. In particular, serum IGFBP3 has been reported both inversely (14) and positively (15, 16) associated with increased cancer risk or showing no difference (12, 17). We observed significantly elevated serum IGF1 levels in patients with lymph node metastases and also in patients indicated for ALND. Morgillo et al. (18) has found a clear and significant correlation of high basal levels of IGF1, IGFBP3 and VEGF-C with lymph node metastasis in endocrine-responsive breast cancer, with expression of those molecules being significantly higher in breast cancer patients than in healthy control subjects.

EGF can activate DNA synthesis and cellular proliferation by acting as a ligand of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR). EGF is also involved in angiogenesis of epidermal tissue (19). The EGFR signaling pathway has been shown to play a key role in the development and growth of tumour cells (20). Drugs based on the blocking of EGFR are being developed for breast cancer treatment (21). Despite the benefit of EGF for cancer therapy, its role in the cancer diagnostic process has not yet been made very clear and studies dealing with serum or plasma EGF in cancer are scarce and involving different sample sizes and characteristics of patient groups. We observed no statistically significant elevation of plasma EGF levels in patient with breast cancer. According to literature data, the serum EGF level depends on the histological types of neoplasms. Balcan et al. (22) found serum EGF levels higher in ovarian cancer patients compared to healthy controls. Similarly, Masiak et al. (23) reported higher serum EGF levels in patients with gastric cancer; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Other studies (24, 25) observed decreased serum EGF levels in breast cancer patiens irrespective of cancer stages.

VEGF is one of the most important pro-angiogenetic factors involved in modulating tumor growth and progression. The subtypes of VEGF, namely VEGF-C and VEGF-D, and soluble receptors of VEGF were found to be strongly associated with lymphangiogenesis (26). The increased expression of VEGF-C may be related to the density of peritumoral lymph capillaries and the risk of metastasis in the lymph nodes (27).

Lawicki et al. (28) observed increased plasma VEGF levels in cancer patients compared to controls. Our results correspond with these findings and, moreover, we found significantly elevated plasma VEGF levels in patients with positive LN compared to negative LN, as well as in patients with ALND compared to patients without ALND. To our knowledge, serum VEGF, in relation with lymph node status, has not been presented in the literature. Several studies have focused only on serum VEGF-C in breast cancer patients (29, 30) and in relation with lymph node status (31); however, the authors found no significant differences. In contrast, Morgillo et al. (18) observed significanlty higher serum VEGF-C levels in endocrine responsive breast cancer patients.

OPG has a variety of biological functions. One of these consists in stimulating tumour cell survival by acting as a receptor for tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) as tumor cells produce OPG that protects them against immune system–induced apoptosis (32). There is evidence from in vitro and in vivo studies that there may be alternative mechanism(s) for OPG-mediated tumour cell growth, including the role of OPG in angiogenesis (33). In our study, we found OPG plasma levels to be reduced in malignant cancer patients compared to the control group. No difference was found in patient subgroups. Lipton et al. (34) found no difference between serum OPG levels of breast cancer patients with no metastasis and the controls. Omar et al. (35) reported significantly elevated serum OPG levels in breast cancer patients in comparison to the control subjects; however, 98% of breast cancers were at an advanced stage. Vik et al. (36) observed an inverse relation between serum OPG and risk of breast cancer in women. As our findings and previously cited papers imply, circulating OPG levels depend on many factors, including the disease stage TRAIL levels and ER/PR status.

OPN plays a role in breast cancer via multiple and complex mechanisms, including interactions with cell surface receptors, growth factor receptor pathways and proteases (37). In cancer, OPN can support cell invasion and anchorage independence, thus enhancing tumor progression and metastasis formation. We found elevated plasma OPN levels in breast cancer patients, while no difference was found in patient subgroups. Accordingly, Weber et al. (38) reported that OPN levels are negativelly associated with survival in several forms of cancer, including breast cancer. Elevated OPN levels in the serum of breast cancer patients have also been reported in other studies (38, 39).

Conclusion

In patients with early breast cancer stages, compared to healthy controls, we observed differences in the levels of the following biomarkers: IGF1, IGFBP3, VEGF, OPG and OPN. These findings contribute to a new insight in the etiopathogenesis of breast cancer and biological therapy choice and monitoring. However, based on the presented data, we conclude that the utilization of these biomarkers in early breast cancer diagnostics is not possible.

In contrast, our current pilot study shows the possibility of using serum IGF1 and VEGF for the estimation of metastatic proces in lymph nodes. Our findings can help in clinical decision-making concerning adjuvant therapy and, especially, indicating potential axillary lymph node dissection. It is necessary to verify these observations in a large multicentric study.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by IGA grant project NT14332-3/2013.

  • Received June 9, 2016.
  • Revision received June 15, 2016.
  • Accepted June 16, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ferlay J,
    2. Soerjomataram I,
    3. Dikshit R,
    4. Eser S,
    5. Mathers C,
    6. Rebelo M,
    7. Parkin DM,
    8. Forman D,
    9. Bray F
    : Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 136: E359-86, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Bryan RM,
    2. Mercer RJ,
    3. Bennett RC,
    4. Rennie GC
    : Prognostic factors in breast cancer and the development of a prognostic index. Br J Surg 73: 267-271, 1986.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Guenther JM,
    2. Hansen NM,
    3. DiFronzo LA,
    4. Giuliano AE,
    5. Collins JC,
    6. Grube BL,
    7. O'Connell TX
    : Axillary dissection is not required for all patients with breast cancer and positive sentinel nodes. Arch Surg 138: 52-56, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Yi M,
    2. Giordano SH,
    3. Meric-Bernstam F,
    4. Mittendorf EA,
    5. Kuerer HM,
    6. Hwang RF,
    7. Bedrosian I,
    8. Rourke L,
    9. Hunt KK
    : Trends in and outcomes from sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) alone vs. SLNB with axillary lymph node dissection for node-positive breast cancer patients: experience from the SEER database. Ann Surg Oncol 17(Suppl 3): 343-351, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Purushotham AD,
    2. Upponi S,
    3. Klevesath MB,
    4. Bobrow L,
    5. Millar K,
    6. Myles JP,
    7. Duffy SW
    : Morbidity after sentinel lymph node biopsy in primary breast cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 23: 4312-4321, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Cerna M,
    2. Zednikova I,
    3. Narsanska A,
    4. Svoboda T,
    5. Hes O,
    6. Zahlava J,
    7. Hlavackova M
    : Avoidance of axillary lymph node dissection in breast cancer patients with metastatic sentinel node – a pilot study. Rozhl Chir 94: 117-125, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Samani AA,
    2. Yakar S,
    3. LeRoith D,
    4. Brodt P
    : The role of the IGF system in cancer growth and metastasis: overview and recent insights. Endocr Rev 28: 20-47, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Bjorndahl M,
    2. Cao R,
    3. Nissen LJ,
    4. Clasper S,
    5. Johnson LA,
    6. Xue Y,
    7. Zhou Z,
    8. Jackson D,
    9. Hansen AJ,
    10. Cao Y
    : Insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 induce lymphangiogenesis in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 15593-15598, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Perks CM,
    2. Holly JM
    : IGF binding proteins (IGFBPs) and regulation of breast cancer biology. J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia 13: 455-469, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kucera R,
    2. Treskova I,
    3. Vrzalova J,
    4. Svobodova S,
    5. Topolcan O,
    6. Fuchsova R,
    7. Rousarova M,
    8. Treska V,
    9. Kydlicek T
    : Evaluation of IGF1 serum levels in malignant melanoma and healthy subjects. Anticancer Res 34: 5217-5220, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Cerna M,
    2. Narsanska A,
    3. Treska V,
    4. Kucera R,
    5. Topolcan O
    : IGF1 and tumor markers in different breast cancer stages. Rozhl Chir 90: 688-694, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Toniolo P,
    2. Bruning PF,
    3. Akhmedkhanov A,
    4. Bonfrer JM,
    5. Koenig KL,
    6. Lukanova A,
    7. Shore RE,
    8. Zeleniuch-Jacquotte A
    : Serum insulin-like growth factor-I and breast cancer. Int J Cancer 88: 828-832, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hartog H,
    2. Boezen HM,
    3. de Jong MM,
    4. Schaapveld M,
    5. Wesseling J,
    6. van der Graaf WT
    : Prognostic value of insulin-like growth factor 1 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 blood levels in breast cancer. Breast 22: 1155-1160, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Krajcik RA,
    2. Borofsky ND,
    3. Massardo S,
    4. Orentreich N
    : Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-binding proteins, and breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11: 1566-1573, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Yu H,
    2. Jin F,
    3. Shu XO,
    4. Li BD,
    5. Dai Q,
    6. Cheng JR,
    7. Berkel HJ,
    8. Zheng W
    : Insulin-like growth factors and breast cancer risk in Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 11: 705-712, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Gronbaek H,
    2. Flyvbjerg A,
    3. Mellemkjaer L,
    4. Tjonneland A,
    5. Christensen J,
    6. Sorensen HT,
    7. Overvad K
    : Serum insulin-like growth factors, insulin-like growth factor binding proteins, and breast cancer risk in postmenopausal women. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13: 1759-1764, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Keinan-Boker L,
    2. Bueno De Mesquita HB,
    3. Kaaks R,
    4. Van Gils CH,
    5. Van Noord PA,
    6. Rinaldi S,
    7. Riboli E,
    8. Seidell JC,
    9. Grobbee DE,
    10. Peeters PH
    : Circulating levels of insulin-like growth factor I, its binding proteins -1,-2, -3, C-peptide and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer 106: 90-95, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Morgillo F,
    2. De Vita F,
    3. Antoniol G,
    4. Orditura M,
    5. Auriemma PP,
    6. Diadema MR,
    7. Lieto E,
    8. Savastano B,
    9. Festino L,
    10. Laterza MM,
    11. Fabozzi A,
    12. Ventriglia J,
    13. Petrillo A,
    14. Ciardiello F,
    15. Barbarisi A,
    16. Iovino F
    : Serum insulin-like growth factor 1 correlates with the risk of nodal metastasis in endocrine-positive breast cancer. Curr Oncol 20: e283-8, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Normanno N,
    2. De Luca A,
    3. Bianco C,
    4. Strizzi L,
    5. Mancino M,
    6. Maiello MR,
    7. Carotenuto A,
    8. De Feo G,
    9. Caponigro F,
    10. Salomon DS
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene 366: 2-16, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Yarden Y
    : The EGFR family and its ligands in human cancer. signalling mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities. Eur J Cancer 37(Suppl 4): S3-8, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Steelman L,
    2. Fitzgerald T,
    3. Lertpiriyapong K,
    4. Cocco L,
    5. Y Follo M,
    6. M Martelli A,
    7. M Neri L,
    8. Marmiroli S,
    9. Libra M,
    10. Candido S,
    11. Nicoletti F,
    12. Scalisi A,
    13. Fenga C,
    14. Drobot L,
    15. Rakus D,
    16. Gizak A,
    17. Laidler P,
    18. Dulinska-Litewka J,
    19. Basecke J,
    20. Mijatovic S,
    21. Maksimovic-Ivanic D,
    22. Montalto G,
    23. Cervello M,
    24. Milella M,
    25. Tafuri A,
    26. Demidenko Z,
    27. Abrams SL,
    28. McCubrey JA
    : Critical Roles of EGFR Family Members in Breast Cancer and Breast Cancer Stem Cells: Targets for Therapy. Curr Pharm Des 22: 2358-2388, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Balcan E,
    2. Demirkiran F,
    3. Aydin Y,
    4. Sanioglu C,
    5. Bese T,
    6. Arvas M,
    7. Akcay T,
    8. Cift T
    : Serum levels of epidermal growth factor, transforming growth factor, and c-erbB2 in ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 22: 1138-1142, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Masiak W,
    2. Szponar A,
    3. Chodorowska G,
    4. Dabrowski A,
    5. Pedowski T,
    6. Wallner G
    : Evaluation of endostatin and EGF serum levels in patients with gastric cancer. Pol Przegl Chir 83: 42-47, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Navarro MA,
    2. Mesia R,
    3. Diez-Gibert O,
    4. Rueda A,
    5. Ojeda B,
    6. Alonso MC
    : Epidermal growth factor in plasma and saliva of patients with active breast cancer and breast cancer patients in follow-up compared with healthy women. Breast Cancer Res Treat 42: 83-86, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Endogenous Hormones and Breast Cancer Collaborative Group,
    2. Key TJ,
    3. Appleby PN,
    4. Reeves GK,
    5. Roddam AW
    : Insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP3), and breast cancer risk: pooled individual data analysis of 17 prospective studies. Lancet Oncol 11: 530-542, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Sundar SS,
    2. Ganesan TS
    : Role of lymphangiogenesis in cancer. J Clin Oncol 25: 4298-4307, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Mohammed RA,
    2. Green A,
    3. El-Shikh S,
    4. Paish EC,
    5. Ellis IO,
    6. Martin SG
    : Prognostic significance of vascular endothelial cell growth factors -A, -C and -D in breast cancer and their relationship with angio- and lymphangiogenesis. Br J Cancer 96: 1092-1100, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lawicki S,
    2. Zajkowska M,
    3. Glazewska EK,
    4. Bedkowska GE,
    5. Szmitkowski M
    : Plasma levels and diagnostic utility of VEGF, MMP-9, and TIMP-1 in the diagnosis of patients with breast cancer. Onco Targets Ther 9: 911-919, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Gisterek I,
    2. Matkowski R,
    3. Lacko A,
    4. Sedlaczek P,
    5. Szewczyk K,
    6. Biecek P,
    7. Halon A,
    8. Staszek U,
    9. Szelachowska J,
    10. Pudelko M,
    11. Bebenek M,
    12. Harlozinska-Szmyrka A,
    13. Kornafel J
    : Serum vascular endothelial growth factors a, C and d in human breast tumors. Pathol Oncol Res 16: 337-344, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Al-Mowallad A,
    2. Kirwan C,
    3. Byrne G,
    4. McDowell G,
    5. Li C,
    6. Stewart A,
    7. Al-Qouzi A,
    8. Kumar S
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor-C in patients with breast cancer. In Vivo 21: 549-551, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Perez D,
    2. Rohde A,
    3. Callejon G,
    4. Perez-Ruiz E,
    5. Rodrigo I,
    6. Rivas-Ruiz F,
    7. Ramos B,
    8. Medina F,
    9. Villatoro R,
    10. Redondo M,
    11. Zarcos I,
    12. Maanon C,
    13. Rueda A
    : Correlation between serum levels of vascular endothelial growth factor-C and sentinel lymph node status in early breast cancer. Tumour Biol 36: 9285-9293, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Holen I,
    2. Shipman CM
    : Role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in cancer. Clin Sci (Lond) 110: 279-291, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Weichhaus M,
    2. Chung ST,
    3. Connelly L
    : Osteoprotegerin in breast cancer: beyond bone remodeling. Mol Cancer 14: 117-015-0390-5, 2015.
  33. ↵
    1. Lipton A,
    2. Ali SM,
    3. Leitzel K,
    4. Chinchilli V,
    5. Witters L,
    6. Engle L,
    7. Holloway D,
    8. Bekker P,
    9. Dunstan CR
    : Serum osteoprotegerin levels in healthy controls and cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 8: 2306-2310, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Omar HS,
    2. Shaker OG,
    3. Nassar YH,
    4. Marzouk SA,
    5. ElMarzouky MS
    : The association between RANKL and Osteoprotegerin gene polymorphisms with breast cancer. Mol Cell Biochem 403: 219-229, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Vik A,
    2. Brodin EE,
    3. Mathiesen EB,
    4. Brox J,
    5. Jorgensen L,
    6. Njolstad I,
    7. Braekkan SK,
    8. Hansen JB
    : Serum osteoprotegerin and future risk of cancer and cancer-related mortality in the general population: the Tromso study. Eur J Epidemiol 30: 219-230, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Anborgh PH,
    2. Caria LB,
    3. Chambers AF,
    4. Tuck AB,
    5. Stitt LW,
    6. Brackstone M
    : Role of plasma osteopontin as a biomarker in locally advanced breast cancer. Am J Transl Res 7: 723-732, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Weber GF,
    2. Lett GS,
    3. Haubein NC
    : Osteopontin is a marker for cancer aggressiveness and patient survival. Br J Cancer 103: 861-869, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Fedarko NS,
    2. Jain A,
    3. Karadag A,
    4. Van Eman MR,
    5. Fisher LW
    : Elevated serum bone sialoprotein and osteopontin in colon, breast, prostate, and lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 7: 4060-4066, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (8)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 8
August 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Circulating Growth and Angiogenic Factors and Lymph Node Status in Early-stage Breast Cancer – A Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 17 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Circulating Growth and Angiogenic Factors and Lymph Node Status in Early-stage Breast Cancer – A Pilot Study
MARIE KARLIKOVA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, ANDREA NARSANSKA, RADEK KUCERA, INKA TRESKOVA, VLADISLAV TRESKA
Anticancer Research Aug 2016, 36 (8) 4209-4214;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Circulating Growth and Angiogenic Factors and Lymph Node Status in Early-stage Breast Cancer – A Pilot Study
MARIE KARLIKOVA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, ANDREA NARSANSKA, RADEK KUCERA, INKA TRESKOVA, VLADISLAV TRESKA
Anticancer Research Aug 2016, 36 (8) 4209-4214;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Serum Levels of IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 in Relation to Clinical and Pathobiological Aspects of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas
  • OPN-a Splicing Variant Expression in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer and its Effects on the Bone Metastatic Abilities of Lung Cancer Cells In Vitro
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Primary Synovial Sarcoma of the Bone: A Case Report and Literature Review
  • Melanoma of the Lower Limbs and Hips: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Analysis of Epidemiology and Survival 2000-2019
  • Ganglioside GD2 Expression Is Associated With Unfavorable Prognosis in Early Triple-negative Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • breast cancer
  • biomarkers
  • IGF1
  • VEGF
  • lymph node status
  • axillary lymph node dissection
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire