Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleExperimental Studies

Efficacy of the Combination of a PARP Inhibitor and UVC on Cancer Cells as Imaged by Focus Formation by the DNA Repair-related Protein 53BP1 Linked to Green Fluorescent Protein

YASUNORI TOME, FUMINARI UEHARA, SHINJI MIWA, SHUYA YANO, SUMIYUKI MII, ELENA V. EFIMOVA, MICHAEL BOUVET, HIROAKI KIMURA, HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA, FUMINORI KANAYA and ROBERT M. HOFFMAN
Anticancer Research August 2016, 36 (8) 3821-3826;
YASUNORI TOME
1AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FUMINARI UEHARA
1AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINJI MIWA
1AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHUYA YANO
1AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUMIYUKI MII
1AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ELENA V. EFIMOVA
5Ludwig Center for Metastasis Research, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHAEL BOUVET
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROAKI KIMURA
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA
4Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
FUMINORI KANAYA
3Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ROBERT M. HOFFMAN
1AntiCancer, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
2Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, CA, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: all@anticancer.com
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: The ability to image DNA repair in cancer cells after irradiation, as well as its inhibition by potential therapeutic agents, is important for the further development of effective cancer therapy. 53BP1 is a DNA repair protein that is overexpressed and forms foci when double-stranded DNA breaks occur in DNA. Materials and Methods: The re-localization of green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused to the chromatin-binding domain of 53BP1 to form foci was imaged after UVC irradiation of breast and pancreatic cancer cells expressing 53BP1-GFP using confocal microscopy. Results: During live-cell imaging, 53BP1-GFP focus formation was observed within 10 minutes after UVC irradiation. Most 53BP1 foci resolved by 100 minutes. To block UVC-induced double-strand break repair in cancer cells, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) was targeted with ABT-888 (veliparib). PARP inhibition markedly enhanced UVC-irradiation-induced persistence of 53BP1-foci, even beyond 100 minutes after UVC irradiation, and reduced proliferation of breast and pancreatic cancer cells. Conclusion: Confocal microscopy of 53BP1-GFP is a powerful method for imaging UVC-induced DNA damage and repair, as well as inhibition of repair.

  • 53BP-1
  • green fluorescent protein
  • DNA damage
  • focus formation
  • DNA repair
  • PARP
  • inhibition
  • ABT888
  • real-time imaging
  • confocal microscopy

Our laboratory pioneered the use of green fluorescent protein (GFP) for in vivo imaging in 1997 (1, 2). With the use of GFP, it became possible to observe individual cancer cells in fresh unstained tissue or even a live animal for the first time. Fluorescent proteins can be used to visualize primary tumor growth, tumor cell motility and invasion, metastatic seeding and colonization, angiogenesis, as well as the interaction between the tumor and its microenvironment (3-8).

Photodynamic therapy has been shown to be effective for certain cancer types (9). Recently, blue light was found to be phototoxic for both murine and human melanoma (10). UV light has been used for the phototherapy of cutaneous malignancies. Psoralen plus UVA (PUVA) and narrowband UVB were the most common phototherapy modalities utilized (11-13). However, the effect of UV light on cancer cells is not well understood (14-16). Our previous study demonstrated that UVC causes cancer cell death in vitro and in vivo (17).

Small molecules targeting cellular response to DNA damage are potential cancer therapeutics (18). The double-strand break response involves rapid recruitment and activation of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) (19-21). PARP inhibitors can act as sensitizers for DNA-damaging agents for cancer therapy (22-26).

We previously demonstrated that UV-induced DNA damage and repair can be visualized by imaging focus formation of GFP fused to the chromatin-binding domain of 53BP1 (27-29). In the present study, we used this imaging strategy to observe the efficacy of the PARP inhibitor, ABT-888 {veliparib; 2-[(R)-2-methyl-pyrrolidin-2-yl]-1H-benzimidazole-4-carboxamide}, on blockage of 53BP1-GFP focus resolution and proliferation of breast cancer and pancreatic cancer cell lines. These results suggests UVC-irradiation and PARP inhibition are a promising therapeutic combination for breast and pancreatic cancer.

Materials and Methods

Cell lines and culture. MiaPaCa-2Tet-On-53BP1-GFP and MCF7TetOn-53BP1-GFP cells (MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP and MCF7-53BP1-GFP, respectively) were certified by Clontech (Mountain View, CA, USA) or other manufacturers. Cells were maintained in high-glucose DMEM with 10% Tet system-approved fetal bovine serum (Clontech), G418 (200 μg/ml), and puromycin (0.5 μg/ml), after induction of 53BP1 expression for 48 hours with doxycycline (1 μg/ml) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

UVC irradiation. For UV irradiation, cells were cultured in 6-well plates. The cells were irradiated from the top using a Benchtop 3UV transilluminator (UVP LLC, Upland, CA, USA) or conventional culture hood UV light. The UV dose was measured with a UVX Radiometer (UVP) or equivalent (17).

UV-induced cancer cell death. In order to determine if UV-induced cancer cell death was dose-dependent, MCF7-53BP1-GFP and MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP were seeded in 6-well plates. After 48 h culture, cells were irradiated with different doses of UVC (25-100 J/m2). Cells were pretreated with 10 μmol/l ABT-888 before UVC irradiation. Ten days after irradiation with or without ABT-888 (Santa Cruz Biotech, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) treatment, the number of cancer colonies were determined by a clonogeneic assay with replicates and performed twice independently.

Clonogenic assay. Clonogenic assays were performed with crystal violet staining according to standard protocols (30).

Live-cell 53BP1 imaging in vitro and quantification of focus number with or without UV treatment in the presence or absence of ABT-888. Live-cell images were captured with an Olympus Fluoview 1000 laser scanning confocal microscope equipped with a XLUMPLFL 20× (0.95 NA) water-immersion objective (31). GFP was excited with a 488 nm laser line of an argon ion laser. Image stacks were obtained through entire nuclei in 8 random fields of cells using 0.33 μm z-steps.

Results and Discussion

53BP1-GFP reports UVC DNA damage and repair in living cells. Following induction with doxycycline, unirradiated MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells (Figure 1A and 1B) contained only rare nuclear foci (mean=1.2 ± 2.3 per cell), consistent with a previous report (24). Unirradiated MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells (Figure 2A) also contained only rare nuclear foci (mean=1.3 ± 2.3 per cell after induction with deoxycycline) (Figure 2A and 2B). The 53BP1-GFP re-localized within minutes after UVC irradiation (25 J) to form nuclear foci, thereby reporting DNA damage. The 53BP1-GFP foci then resolved relatively quickly over the next 90 minutes, thereby reporting DNA repair.

In both MCF7-53BP1-GFP and MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells, 53BP1 foci increased after UVC irradiation (Figure 1B and 2B). After 5 minutes, MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells had a mean ± SD of 29.8 ± 11.0 53BP1 foci and MiaPaCa-2 cells had a mean of 32.0 ± 11.0. After 10 minutes, the number of foci rose to 32.5 ± 9.7 and 34.2 ± 9.2, respectively. After 15 minutes, MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells had a mean of 33.8 ± 9.9 and MiaPaCa-2 cells a mean of 37.3 ± 8.9 53BP1 foci.

UVC-induced cancer cell death. After exposure to different doses of UVC, the number of cancer colonies was quantitated with a clonogenic assay (Figures 3A and 4A). As little as 25 J/m2 UVC irradiation killed approximately 65% of both MCF7-53BP1-GFP and MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells. This is consistent with 53BP1-GFP focus formation at 25 J UVC irradiation. The frequency of cell killing plateaued at 75 J/m2 (Figures 3B and 4B).

PARP 1 inhibitor ABT-888 caused persistence of 53BP1-GFP foci, suppressing cell proliferation. Treating MCF7-53BP1-GFP and MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells with UVC irradiation in the presence of the PARP 1 inhibitor ABT-888 (24, 30, 32) markedly increased 53BPI-GFP focus formation (Figures 5A and 6A). Time-lapse live-cell imaging of 53BP1-GFP demonstrated that in cells treated with UVC only, 53BP1-GFP appeared within 10 minutes and began to decrease noticeably by 70 minutes (Figures 5B and 6B). However, after combined treatment with UVC plus ABT-888, 53BP1-GFP foci persisted for greater than 70 minutes. Treatment with ABT-888 alone slightly reduced colony formation at 10 μmol/l (MCF7-53BP1-GFP: 95.1 ± 6.1% of control, MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP; 92.6 ± 9.8% of control). However, ABT-888 significantly reduced colony formation following 25 J/m2 (UVC alone versus UVC + ABT-888 relative to the control: 34.1 ± 1.1% versus 8.7 ± 1.9%, respectively, in MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells; 31.8 ± 2.8% versus 12.4 ± 3.1%, respectively, in MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP; p<0.01 Student t-test, respectively), with similar fold reductions at UVC doses up to 50 J/m2 (Figures 5C and 6C).

Our results indicated that UVC light induces cell death in both breast and pancreatic cancer cells, consistent with our previous report (17). Furthermore, our results demonstrate enhancement of UVC irradiation efficacy by PARP inhibition and further implicate UVC irradiation-induced foci as a potential indicator of DNA damage. The results in the present report indicate that the efficacy of UVC on cancer cell death is time- and dose-dependent. Although UVC light does not deeply penetrate tissue, we assumed that a combination of UVC irradiation with PARP inhibition could be more effective to accelerate tumor cell death in clinical settings, at least with superficial cancer, including minimal residual disease (17).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Kinetics of 53BP1-GFP focus formation after UVC irradiation 0f MCF7-53BP1-GFP human breast cancer cells. A: Formation of 53BP1-GFP foci in response to UVC (25 J/m2) with respect to duration of irradiation. Bar=10 μm. B: Average number of 53BP1-GFP foci per cell plotted against total time of irradiation (n >50) UVC irradiation (25 J/m2). Bars=SD.

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kinetics of 53BP1-GFP focus formation after UVC irradiation of MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP human pancreatic cancer cells. A: Formation of 53BP1-GFP foci in response to UVC with respect to duration of irradiation. Bar=10 μm. B: Average number of 53BP1-GFP foci per cell plotted against total time of UVC irradiation (25 J/m2) (n>50). Bars=SD.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

UVC irradiation induces MCF7-53BP1-GFP cell death. A: Cells were irradiated with UVC (25-100 J/m2), fixed at 10 days, and stained with crystal violet. B: Clonogenic survival of MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells treated with increasing doses of UVC. Data are the mean±SD (n=6). Clonogenic efficiency of untreated MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells with the control set at 100%.

Figure 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 4.

UVC irradiation induces MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cell death. A: UVC irradiation suppresses the growth of MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells. Cells were irradiated with UVC (25-100 J/m2), fixed at 10 days, and stained with crystal violet. B: Clonogenic survival of MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells treated with increasing doses of UVC. Data are the mean ± SD (n=6). Clonogenic efficiency of untreated MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells with the control set at 100%.

Figure 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 5.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitor ABT-888 causes persistence of 53BP1-GFP foci and suppresses cell proliferation of MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells. A: ABT-888 increased the number of residual UVC-induced foci in MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells 24 h after UVC irradiation (25 J/m2). Cells were pretreated with 10 μmol/l ABT-888 before UVC irradiation. Bar=5 μm. B: Time-course, live-cell imaging of 53BP1-GFP focus formation in MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells treated with UVC with/without ABT-888. Bar=10 μm. C: ABT-888 suppressed the growth of UVC-irradiated MCF7-53BP1-GFP cells. Cells were treated as shown, fixed at 10 days, and stained with crystal violet.

Enhancement of ionizing-radiation (IR) effects by PARP inhibition has been reported (24-26). IR-induced 53BP1 foci in MCF7 cells persisted with the combination of IR and a PARP inhibitor. Moreover, PARP inhibition increased breast cancer cell senescence both in vitro and in vivo (24).

PARP inhibitors may be effective as cancer treatment in combination with UV irradiation alone. It has also been shown that expression of a fluorescent protein by cancer cells can enhance killing by UVC (33). This could have curative potential when cancer cells are made fluorescent in vivo such as with a GFP-containing telomerase-dependent adenovirus or other fluorophore used for tumor illumination to effect fluorescence-guided surgery (34-39).

Figure 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 6.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitor ABT-888 causes persistence of 53BP1-GFP foci and suppresses cell proliferation of MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells. A: ABT-888 increased the number of residual UVC-induced foci in MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells 24 h after UVC irradiation (25 J/m2). Cells were pretreated with 10 μmol/l ABT-888 before UVC irradiation. Bar=5 μm. B: Time-course, live-cell imaging of 53BP1-GFP localization in MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells treated with UVC with/without ABT-888. Bar=10 μm. C: ABT-888 suppressed the growth of UVC-irradiated MiaPaCa-2-53BP1-GFP cells. Cells were treated as shown, fixed at 10 days, and stained with crystal violet.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a grant from the Nakatomi Foundation.

Footnotes

  • This article is freely accessible online.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

  • Dedication

    This paper is dedicated to the memory of A. R. Moossa, M.D. and Sun Lee, M.D.

  • Received May 18, 2016.
  • Revision received June 15, 2016.
  • Accepted June 16, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Chishima T,
    2. Miyagi Y,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Yamaoka H,
    5. Shimada H,
    6. Moossa AR,
    7. Hoffman RM
    : Cancer invasion and micrometastasis visualized in live tissue by green fluorescent protein expression. Cancer Res 57: 2042-2047, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Chishima T,
    2. Miyagi Y,
    3. Wang X,
    4. Tan Y,
    5. Shimada H,
    6. Moossa AR,
    7. Hoffman RM
    : Visualization of the metastatic process by green fluorescent protein expression. Anticancer Res 17: 2377-2384, 1997.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hoffman RM
    : The multiple uses of fluorescent proteins to visualize cancer in vivo. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 796-806, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yang M,
    2. Baranov E,
    3. Jing P,
    4. Sun FX,
    5. Li XM,
    6. Li L,
    7. Hasegawa S,
    8. Bouvet M,
    9. Al-Tuwaijri M,
    10. Chishima T,
    11. Shimada H,
    12. Moossa AR,
    13. Penman S,
    14. Hoffman RM
    : Whole-body optical imaging of green fluorescent protein-expressing tumors and metastases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 1206-1211, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yamamoto N,
    2. Jiang P,
    3. Yang M,
    4. Xu M,
    5. Yamauchi K,
    6. Tsuchiya H,
    7. Tomita K,
    8. Wahl GM,
    9. Moossa AR,
    10. Hoffman RM
    : Cellular dynamics visualized in live cells in vitro and in vivo by differential dual-color nuclear-cytoplasmic fluorescent-protein expression. Cancer Res 64: 4251-4256, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Yang M
    : Subcellular imaging in the live mouse. Nature Protoc 1: 775-782, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Hoffman RM,
    2. Yang M
    : Color-coded fluorescent imaging of tumor-host interactions. Nature Protoc 1: 928-935, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Yang M,
    2. Li L,
    3. Jiang P,
    4. Moossa AR,
    5. Penman S,
    6. Hoffman RM
    : Dual-color fluorescence imaging distinguishes tumor cells from induced host angiogenic vessels and stromal cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 14259-14262, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Castano AP,
    2. Liu Q,
    3. Hamblin ME
    : A green fluorescent protein-expressing murine tumour but not its wild-type counterpart is cured by photodaynamic therapy. Br J Cancer 94: 391-397, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Sparas A,
    2. Faucher K,
    3. Sol V,
    4. Durox H,
    5. Boulinguez S,
    6. Doffoel-Hantz V,
    7. Calliste CA,
    8. Cook-Moreau J,
    9. Krausz P,
    10. Sturtz FG,
    11. Bedane C,
    12. Jauberteau-Marchan MO,
    13. Ratinaud MH,
    14. Bonnetblanc JM
    : Blue light is phototoxic for B16F10 murine melanoma and bovine endothelial cell lines by direct cytocidal effect. Anticancer Res 30: 143-147, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Gilchrest BA,
    2. Parrish JA,
    3. Tanenbaum L,
    4. Haynes HA,
    5. Fitzpatrick TB
    : Oral methoxsalen photochemotherapy of mycosis fungoides. Cancer 38: 683-689, 1976.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hofer A,
    2. Cerroni L,
    3. Kerl H,
    4. Wolf P
    : Narrowband (311-nm) UV-B therapy for small plaque parapsoriasis and early-stage mycosis fungoides. Arch Dermatol 135: 1377-1380, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Carter J,
    2. Zug KA
    : Phototherapy for cutaneouse T-cell lymphoma: Online survery and literature review. J AM Acad Dermatol 60: 39-50, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Zacal N,
    2. Rainbow AJ
    : Photodynamic therapy resistant human colon carcinoma HT29 cells show cross-resistance to UVA but not UVC Light. Photochem Photobiol 83: 730-737, 2007.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Benecia F,
    2. Courrèges MC,
    3. Coukos G
    : Whole tumor antigen vaccination using dendritic cells: Comparison of RNA electroporation and pulsing with UV-irradiated tumor cell. J Transl Med 6: 21, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Kim SC,
    2. Park S-S,
    3. Lee YJ
    : Effect of UV irradiation on colorectal cancer cells with acquired TRAIL resistance. J Cell Biochem 104: 1172-1180, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kimura H,
    2. Lee C,
    3. Hayashi K,
    4. Yamauchi K,
    5. Yamamoto N,
    6. Tsuchiya H,
    7. Tomita K,
    8. Bouvet M,
    9. Hoffman RM
    : UV light killing efficacy of fluorescent protein-expressing cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. J Cell Biochem 110: 1439-1446, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Ljungman M
    : Targeting the DNA damage response in cancer. Chem Rev 109: 2929, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Schreiber V,
    2. Dantzer F,
    3. Ame JC,
    4. de Murcia G
    : Poly(ADP-ribose): novel functions for an old molecule. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 517-528, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Gagne JP,
    2. Isabelle M,
    3. Lo KS,
    4. Bourassa S,
    5. Hendzel MJ,
    6. Dawson VL,
    7. Dawson TM,
    8. Poirier GG
    : Proteome-wide identification of poly(ADP-ribose) binding proteins and poly(ADP-ribose)-associated protein complexes. Nucleic Acids Res 36: 6959-6976, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Kraus WL
    : New functions for an ancient domain. Nat Struct Mol Biol 16: 904-907, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Rondon J,
    2. Iniesta MD,
    3. Papadopoulos K
    : Development of PARP inhibitors in oncology. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 18: 31-43, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liu X,
    2. Shi Y,
    3. Guan R,
    4. Donawho C,
    5. Luo Y,
    6. Palma J,
    7. Zhu GD,
    8. Johnson EF,
    9. Rodriguez LE,
    10. Ghoreishi-Haack N,
    11. Jarvis K,
    12. Hradil VP,
    13. Colon-Lopez M,
    14. Cox BF,
    15. Klinghofer V,
    16. Penning T,
    17. Rosenberg SH,
    18. Frost D,
    19. Giranda VL,
    20. Luo Y
    : Potentiation of temozolomide cytotoxicity by poly (ADP) ribose polymerase inhibitor ABT-888 requires a conversion of single-stranded DNA damage to double-stranded DNA breaks. Mol Cancer Res 6: 1621, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Efimova EV,
    2. Mauceri HJ,
    3. Golden DW,
    4. Labay E,
    5. Bindokas VP,
    6. Darga TE,
    7. Chakraborty C,
    8. Barreto-Andrade JC,
    9. Crawley C,
    10. Sutton HG,
    11. Kron SJ
    : Poly(ADP-Ribosome) polymerase inhibitor induces accelerated senescence in irradiated breast cancer cells and tumors. Cancer Res 70: 6277-6282, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Donawho CK,
    2. Luo Y,
    3. Luo Y,
    4. Penning TD,
    5. Bauch JL,
    6. Bouska JJ,
    7. Bontcheva-Diaz VD,
    8. Cox BF,
    9. DeWeese TL,
    10. Dillehay LE,
    11. Ferguson DC,
    12. Ghoreishi-Haack NS,
    13. Grimm DR,
    14. Guan R,
    15. Han EK,
    16. Holley-Shanks RR,
    17. Hristov B,
    18. Idler KB,
    19. Jarvis K,
    20. Johnson EF,
    21. Kleinberg LR,
    22. Klinghofer V,
    23. Lasko LM,
    24. Liu X,
    25. Marsh KC,
    26. McGonigal TP,
    27. Meulbroek JA,
    28. Olson AM,
    29. Palma JP,
    30. Rodriguez LE,
    31. Shi Y,
    32. Stavropoulos JA,
    33. Tsurutani AC,
    34. Zhu GD,
    35. Rosenberg SH,
    36. Giranda VL,
    37. Frost DJ
    : ABT-888, an orally active poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that potentiates DNA-damaging agents in preclinical tumor models. Clin Cancer Res 13: 2728-2737, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Pryde F,
    2. Khalili S,
    3. Robertson K,
    4. Selfridge J,
    5. Ritchie AM,
    6. Melton DW,
    7. Jullien D,
    8. Adachi Y
    : 53BP1 exchanges slowly at the sites of DNA damage and appears to require RNA for its association with chromatin. J Cell Sci 118: 2043-2055, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Miwa S,
    2. Tome Y,
    3. Yano S,
    4. Hiroshima Y,
    5. Uehara F,
    6. Mii S,
    7. Kimura H,
    8. Hayashi K,
    9. Tsuchiya H,
    10. Bouvet M,
    11. Efimova EV,
    12. Hoffman RM
    : Single cell time-lapse imaging of focus formation by the DNA damage-response protein 53BP1 after UVC irradiation of human pancreatic cancer cells. Anticancer Res 33: 1373-1377, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Miwa S,
    2. Yano S,
    3. Hiroshima Y,
    4. Tome Y,
    5. Uehara F,
    6. Mii S,
    7. Efimova EV,
    8. Kimura H,
    9. Hayashi K,
    10. Tsuchiya H,
    11. Hoffman RM
    : Imaging UVC-induced DNA damage response in models of minimal cancer. J Cell Biochem 114: 2493-2499, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Uehara F,
    2. Miwa S,
    3. Tome Y,
    4. Hiroshima Y,
    5. Yano S,
    6. Yamamoto M,
    7. Efimova EV,
    8. Matsumoto Y,
    9. Maehara H,
    10. Bouvet M,
    11. Kanaya F,
    12. Hoffman RM
    : Comparison of UVB and UVC effects on the DNA damage-response protein 53BP1 in human pancreatic cancer. J Cell Biochem 115: 1724-1728, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Franken NA,
    2. Rodermond HM,
    3. Stap J,
    4. Haveman J,
    5. van Bree C
    : Clonogenic assay of cells in vitro. Nat Protoc 1: 2315-2319, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Uchugonova A,
    2. Duong J,
    3. Zhang N,
    4. König K,
    5. Hoffman RM
    : The bulge area is the origin of nestin-expressing pluripotent stem cells of the hair follicle. J Cell Biochem 112: 2046-2050, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Penning TD,
    2. Zhu GD,
    3. Gandhi VB,
    4. Gong J,
    5. Liu X,
    6. Shi Y,
    7. Klinghofer V,
    8. Johnson EF,
    9. Donawho CK,
    10. Frost DJ,
    11. Bontcheva-Diaz V,
    12. Bouska JJ,
    13. Osterling DJ,
    14. Olson AM,
    15. Marsh KC,
    16. Luo Y,
    17. Giranda VL
    : Discovery of the Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP)inhibitor 2-[(R)-2-methylpyrrolidin-2yl]-1H-benzimida-zole-4-carboxamide (ABT-888) for the treatment of cancer. J Med Chem 52: 514-523, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Momiyama M,
    2. Suetsugu A,
    3. Kimura H,
    4. Kishimoto H,
    5. Aki R,
    6. Yamada A,
    7. Sakurada H,
    8. Chishima T,
    9. Bouvet M,
    10. Bulgakova NN,
    11. Endo I,
    12. Hoffman RM
    : Fluorescent proteins enhance UVC PDT of cancer cells. Anticancer Res 32: 4327-4330, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Kishimoto H,
    2. Zhao M,
    3. Hayashi K,
    4. Urata Y,
    5. Tanaka N,
    6. Fujiwara T,
    7. Penman S,
    8. Hoffman RM
    : In vivo internal tumor illumination by telomerase-dependent adenoviral GFP for precise surgical navigation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106: 14514-14517, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kishimoto H,
    2. Urata Y,
    3. Tanaka N,
    4. Fujiwara T,
    5. Hoffman RM
    : Selective metastatic tumor labeling with green fluorescent protein and killing by systemic administration of telomerase-dependent adenoviruses. Mol Cancer Therap 8: 3001-3008, 2009.
    OpenUrl
    1. Kishimoto H,
    2. Aki R,
    3. Urata Y,
    4. Bouvet M,
    5. Momiyama M,
    6. Tanaka N,
    7. Fujiwara T,
    8. Hoffman RM
    : Tumor-selective adenoviral-mediated GFP genetic labeling of human cancer in the live mouse reports future recurrence after resection. Cell Cycle 10: 2737-2741, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yano S,
    2. Miwa S,
    3. Kishimoto H,
    4. Uehara F,
    5. Tazawa H,
    6. Toneri M,
    7. Hiroshima Y,
    8. Yamamoto M,
    9. Urata Y,
    10. Kagawa S,
    11. Bouvet M,
    12. Funiwara T,
    13. Hoffman RM
    : Targeting tumors with a killer-reporter adenovirus for curative fluorescence-guided surgery of soft-tissue sarcoma. Oncotarget 6: 13133-13148, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Yano S,
    2. Miwa S,
    3. Kishimoto H,
    4. Toneri M,
    5. Hiroshima Y,
    6. Yamamoto M,
    7. Bouvet M,
    8. Urata Y,
    9. Tazawa H,
    10. Kagawa S,
    11. Funiwara T,
    12. Hoffman RM
    : Experimental curative fluorescence-guided surgery of highly invasive glioblastoma multiforme selectively labeled with a killer-reporter adenovirus. Mol Therapy 23: 1182-1188, 2015.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Hiroshima Y,
    2. Maawy A,
    3. Zhang Y,
    4. Sato S,
    5. Murakami T,
    6. Yamamoto M,
    7. Uehara F,
    8. Miwa S,
    9. Yano S,
    10. Momiyama M,
    11. Chishima T,
    12. Tanaka K,
    13. Bouvet M,
    14. Endo I,
    15. Hoffman RM
    : Fluorescence-guided surgery in combination with UVC irradiation cures metastatic human pancreatic cancer in orthotopic mouse models. PLoS One 9: e99977, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (8)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 8
August 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Efficacy of the Combination of a PARP Inhibitor and UVC on Cancer Cells as Imaged by Focus Formation by the DNA Repair-related Protein 53BP1 Linked to Green Fluorescent Protein
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Efficacy of the Combination of a PARP Inhibitor and UVC on Cancer Cells as Imaged by Focus Formation by the DNA Repair-related Protein 53BP1 Linked to Green Fluorescent Protein
YASUNORI TOME, FUMINARI UEHARA, SHINJI MIWA, SHUYA YANO, SUMIYUKI MII, ELENA V. EFIMOVA, MICHAEL BOUVET, HIROAKI KIMURA, HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA, FUMINORI KANAYA, ROBERT M. HOFFMAN
Anticancer Research Aug 2016, 36 (8) 3821-3826;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Efficacy of the Combination of a PARP Inhibitor and UVC on Cancer Cells as Imaged by Focus Formation by the DNA Repair-related Protein 53BP1 Linked to Green Fluorescent Protein
YASUNORI TOME, FUMINARI UEHARA, SHINJI MIWA, SHUYA YANO, SUMIYUKI MII, ELENA V. EFIMOVA, MICHAEL BOUVET, HIROAKI KIMURA, HIROYUKI TSUCHIYA, FUMINORI KANAYA, ROBERT M. HOFFMAN
Anticancer Research Aug 2016, 36 (8) 3821-3826;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • 5-Azacytidine (5-aza) Induces p53-associated Cell Death Through Inhibition of DNA Methyltransferase Activity in Hep3B and HT-29 Cells
  • Prognostic Value of WNT1, NOTCH1, PDGFRβ, and CXCR4 in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
  • Hypoxia-adapted Multiple Myeloma Stem Cells Resist γδ-T-Cell-mediated Killing by Modulating the Mevalonate Pathway
Show more Experimental Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • 53BP-1
  • green fluorescent protein
  • DNA damage
  • focus formation
  • DNA repair
  • PARP
  • inhibition
  • ABT888
  • real-time imaging
  • confocal microscopy
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire