Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues 2025
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticlePROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, 5 December 2015 (Tokyo, Japan)

Nuclear Y-Box-binding Protein-1 Expression Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage III Colorectal Cancer

SACHIKO SHIRAIWA, TETSUSHI KINUGASA, AKIHIKO KAWAHARA, TOMOAKI MIZOBE, TAKAFUMI OHCHI, KOTARO YUGE, SHINYA FUJINO, MITSUHIRO KATAGIRI, SUSUMU SHIMOMURA, KENSUKE TAJIRI, TOMOYA SUDO, MASAYOSHI KAGE, MICHIHIKO KUWANO and YOSHITO AKAGI
Anticancer Research July 2016, 36 (7) 3781-3788;
SACHIKO SHIRAIWA
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TETSUSHI KINUGASA
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: kinugasa_tetsushi@med.kurume-u.ac.jp
AKIHIKO KAWAHARA
2Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMOAKI MIZOBE
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TAKAFUMI OHCHI
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KOTARO YUGE
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SHINYA FUJINO
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MITSUHIRO KATAGIRI
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
SUSUMU SHIMOMURA
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KENSUKE TAJIRI
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TOMOYA SUDO
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAYOSHI KAGE
2Department of Pathology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MICHIHIKO KUWANO
3Department of Biochemistry, Kyushu University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
YOSHITO AKAGI
1Department of Surgery, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background/aim: Y-Box-binding protein-1 (YB-1), a DNA/RNA-binding protein, is an important oncogenic transcription and translation factor. We aimed to evaluate the relationships between nuclear YB-1 expression, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status, and poor clinical outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Materials and Methods: Nuclear YB-1 expression was immunohistochemically analyzed in CRC tissues obtained from 124 patients who underwent curative resection between 2005 and 2008. Correlations between nuclear YB-1 expression, various clinicopathological characteristics, EGFR status, and prognostic factors were evaluated. Results: High-grade nuclear YB-1 expression was detected in 62.9% of cases and was found to be an independent predictor of poorer overall survival (p<0.001) and relapse-free survival (p<0.001). A trend was also observed towards a positive correlation between nuclear YB-1 expression and EGFR status (p=0.051). Conclusion: Nuclear YB-1 expression is a useful prognostic biomarker that correlates with EGFR status in patients with CRC.

  • Y-Box-binding protein-1
  • epidermal growth factor receptor
  • colorectal cancer
  • prognosis

Colorectal cancer (CRC) presents a serious threat to human health, with high incidence and mortality rates reported in many countries. In 2012, CRC represented the third most common form of cancer in men (746,000 cases, 10.0% of the total cancer cases) and the second most common form of cancer in women (614,000 cases, 9.2% of the total cancer cases), worldwide (1). Treatment for CRC has improved recently; however, almost 50.0% of patients who undergo radical surgery die of metastasis or recurrence. It is therefore, imperative, to identify factors predictive of CRC metastasis or recurrence (e.g. clinicopathological characteristics, preoperative tumour markers, and tumour-node-metastasis features). The understanding of the molecular regulatory mechanisms associated with CRC invasion and metastasis has been of great importance in guiding clinical diagnosis and treatment (2).

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a 170-kDa transmembrane glycoprotein receptor tyrosine kinase that has been found overexpressed in approximately 80.0% of patients with CRC (3). Specific ligands, including epidermal growth factors, attach to form EGFR or a dimer with other molecules of the human EGFR family. EGFR is activated and signal transduction is triggered to downstream components of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT)/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and rat sarcoma (RAS)/recombinant activated factor (RAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) signalling pathways occurs (4). EGFR signalling has been shown to play a critical role in cytodifferentiation, proliferation, and maintenance of normal tissues. On the other hand, EGFR signalling has also been shown to be involved in an increased risk of developing cancer, as well as invasion, metastasis, survival, and tumour angiogenesis in colon cancer tissue (5).

Y-Box-binding protein-1 (YB-1) is a member of a family of DNA/RNA-binding proteins that has a highly conserved cold-shock domain. It is an important oncogenic transcription and translation factor (6). YB-1 binds to the Y-box DNA sequence (an inverted CCAAT box) in the eukaryotic promoter (7). YB-1 plays a critical role in various cellular processes, including the regulation of transcription and translation, DNA repair, proliferation, and drug resistance.

Herein, we aimed to evaluate the relationships between nuclear YB-1 expression, EGFR status, clinicopathological characteristics, and survival outcomes in patients with stage III CRC.

Materials and Methods

Patients and tumour samples. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue specimens were obtained from 124 patients with stage III CRC who underwent surgery at Kurume University Hospital (Fukuoka, Japan) between 2005 and 2008. A summary of the patients' clinicopathological characteristics is provided in Table I. Curative resection with regional lymphadenectomy was performed in all patients. None of the patients received preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Postoperative pathological staging was determined according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma (8).

The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Kurume University, Japan (no. 269). All participants provided informed, written consent. Research was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and Title 45, U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, Part 46, Protection of Human Subjects, effective December 13, 2001.

Immunohistochemical analysis. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks were cut into 4-μm-thick sections, placed on coated glass slides, and labelled with antibodies against YB-1 and EGFR using the BenchMark XT (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA) or ChemMate ENVISION (DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark) methods. The BenchMark XT protocol was followed for YB-1, EGFR, and human EGFR2. This automated system utilizes the streptavidin-biotin complex method (iVIEW DAB Detection Kit; Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). Antigen retrieval for YB-1 and EGFR2 was performed using heat treatment in Cell Conditioning 1 (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA), while antigen retrieval for EGFR was performed using proteinase K treatment (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). Endogenous peroxidase activity was inhibited by incubating the slides in a 3.0% hydrogen peroxide solution for 5 minutes. Each slide was then incubated overnight with the designated antibody, at 4°C. To detect staining, 3,3’-diaminobenzidine (Ventana Medical Systems Inc., Tuscon, AZ, USA) was used as the chromogen. Specimens were viewed using an Olympus BX51 microscope (Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Immunohistochemical grading. Nuclear YB-1 expression was calculated from the mean values of three microscopic fields selected from those with the greatest accumulation of positive signals (hot spots), as described previously (9). A total number of hot spots of less than three in the three microscopic fields was categorized as low-grade, while a total of more than three was categorized as high-grade. EGFR expression was stratified into four groups as follows: no staining or weak membranous expression in <10% of cancer cells: score 0; negative; weak expression in >10% of cancer cells: score 1+, negative; weak to moderate expression along the entire membrane in >10% of cancer cells: score 2+, positive; and strong expression along the entire membrane in >10% of cancer cells: score 3+, positive. The results of the immunohistochemical studies were evaluated by two experienced reviewers (S.S. and T.M.) who were blinded to the clinical status of the patients (Figure 1).

Statistical analysis. Associations between nuclear YB-1 expression, clinicopathological characteristics of the patients, and molecular markers, including EGFR, were evaluated using Fisher's exact tests. Probability (p)-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant, unless otherwise indicated. Survival curves were computed using the Kaplan–Meier method and statistical significance was assessed using a log-rank test. Overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were defined as the time period extending from the operation to the date of death or disease recurrence, respectively. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. All statistical analyses were conducted using JMP, software version 11.0 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinicopathological characteristics of patients (N=124) with stage III colorectal cancer.

Results

Patients' clinicopathological characteristics and nuclear YB-1 expression. Relationships between the clinicopathological characteristics of Stage III CRC patients (N=124) and nuclear YB-1 expression are summarized in Table II. Nuclear YB-1 expression was not observed to correlate with the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with stage III CRC.

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Immunohistochemical staining of primary colorectal tumours, including representative cases of low-grade (A) and high-grade (B) nuclear Y-box binding protein-1 expression (arrows; ×200 magnification), as well as those with scores for epidermal growth factor receptor expression of 0 (negative) (C), 1+ (negative) (D), 2+ (positive) (E), and 3+ (positive) (F) (×40 magnification).

Correlation between nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression. Table III displays the result of a Fisher's exact test comparing nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression. High-grade nuclear YB-1 expression was detected in 62.9% of cases (N=78), while EGFR expression was positive in 37.1% of cases (N=46). There was a trend towards a positive correlation between nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression in patients with stage III CRC (p=0.051; Table III).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Relationship between nuclear Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients (N=124) with stage III colorectal cancer.

Survival analysis. Patients with high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression (N=78) exhibited a significant reduction in their OS (p<0.001; Figure 2A) and RFS rates (p<0.001; Figure 2B) compared to patients with low-grade nuclear YB-1 expression (N=46). The 5-year OS and RFS rates of patients with high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression were 61.5% and 56.5%, respectively, while those for patients with low-grade nuclear YB-1 expression were 93.3% and 97.8%, respectively. The OS (p<0.001) and RFS rates (p<0.001) of the EGFR-positive group were significantly lower than those reported for the EGFR-negative group. In addition, we analyzed the effects of nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression on the OS and RFS rates of patients with stage III CRC. Positive nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression were associated with a significantly poorer prognosis. The OS (p<0.001; Figure 3A) and RFS rates (p<0.001; Figure 3B) of the EGFR-positive, high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression group (N=44) were significantly lower than those reported for the EGFR-negative, low-grade YB-1 expression group (N=12).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Correlation between nuclear Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in patients (N=124) with stage III colorectal cancer.

In the univariate analysis, increasing tumour depth (p<0.05), poor histological type (p<0.01), lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.05), and high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression (p<0.001) were found to be factors predictive of poorer OS (Table IV). Moreover, age above 68 years (p<0.05), poorer histological type (p<0.001), lymph node metastasis (p<0.01), and high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression (p<0.001) were found to be factors predictive of poorer RFS (Table V).

Applying a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, increasing tumour depth [hazard ratio (HR)=6.36, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.36-11.3; p<0.05], histological type (HR=3.56, 95% CI=1.48-7.68; p<0.01), lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (HR=2.10, 95% CI=1.07-4.19; p<0.05), and high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression (HR=4.98, 95% CI=2.08-14.7; p<0.001) were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for OS (Table IV). Age above 68 years (HR=2.25, 95% CI=1.12-4.74; p<0.05), poor histological type (HR=6.34, 95% CI=2.40-16.9; p<0.001), and high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression (HR=34.9, 95% CI=7.31-627; p<0.001) were confirmed as independent prognostic factors for RFS (Table V).

Discussion

Our present findings demonstrate that high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression is associated with poor prognosis and recurrence in patients with stage III CRC. Moreover, we also observed a trend towards a positive correlation between nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression in patients with stage III CRC. These findings suggest that nuclear YB-1 expression correlates with EGFR expression, and high-grade expression of both nuclear YB-1 and EGFR are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with stage III CRC.

Previous reports have established YB-1 as an important regulator of the cell cycle, cell proliferation, DNA repair, oncogenic transcription, translation, and drug resistance (10, 11). In CRC, YB-1 expression correlates with prognosis and could serve as a poor prognostic biomarker, although the mechanism(s) by which nuclear YB-1 localization contributes to CRC is not clearly understood (12, 13). Specifically, previous studies have reported on a correlation between nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression in breast, lung, and cervical cancer (14-17).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival (OS) (A) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (B) rates according to nuclear Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) expression in patients with stage III colorectal cancer. High-grade nuclear YB-1 expression, N=78; low-grade nuclear YB-1 expression, N=46.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival (OS) (A) and relapse-free survival (RFS) (B) rates according to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status and nuclear Y-box binding protein-1 (YB-1) expression in patients with stage III colorectal cancer. EGFR-negative cases with low-grade nuclear YB-1 expression, N=34; EGFR-positive cases with high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression, N=34.

Under normal cellular conditions, YB-1 localizes to the cytoplasm of benign cells (18). However, in response to DNA_damaging factors (e.g. xenobiotics and ultraviolet irradiation), YB-1 is often translocated to the nucleus (19). Moreover, Eliseeva et al. have described how nuclear translocation of YB-1 can be promoted by some growth factors and cytokines (20). Nuclear YB-1 expression is induced by the phosphorylation of serine residue 102 which is located in the cold-shock domain. Phosphorylation is promoted through the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signalling pathways and has been shown to be a poor prognostic factor in melanomas, as well as in breast and ovarian carcinomas (21-23).

In breast cancer, YB-1 phosphorylation was reported to be induced via EGFR, downstream of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK/ERK signalling pathways, in response to exposure to ionizing radiation (24). Hyogotani et al. also demonstrated a positive correlation between nuclear YB-1 and EGFR expression (15). Specifically, short interfering RNA-induced down-regulation of YB-1 expression was associated with a concomitant reduction in the up-regulation of EGFR expression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Therefore, nuclear translocation of YB-1 induces the up-regulation of EGFR expression (15). Moreover, it suggests that YB-1 binds directly to the EGFR promoter and that EGFR is a YB-1-responsive gene that relies on serine residue 102 for optimal DNA binding (25). Our present findings demonstrate that high-grade nuclear YB-1 expression tends to be positively correlated with EGFR expression in patients with stage III CRC. Moreover, patients with stage III CRC expressing high nuclear YB-1 and EGFR levels are had a poor prognosis. These findings suggest that nuclear YB-1 may be involved in EGFR signalling pathways that results in an unfavourable prognostic phenotype in CRC.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of overall survival using a Cox proportional hazards model in patients (N=124) with stage III colorectal cancer.

EGFR has been shown to be overexpressed in CRC and has also been associated with a poor prognosis (26). Therefore, molecularly targeted therapies (e.g., EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab) were introduced to treat unresectable and progressive or recurrent CRC. For EGFR-targeted therapy, expression of EGFR was initially considered important. However, it has subsequently been reported that mutations in v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog(KRAS), encoding the downstream signal transmission protein, may be more significant than the expression of EGFR itself. In addition, it has become apparent that the KRAS mutation status of the tumour may be a negative predictive factor of EGFR-targeted therapy in CRC (27, 28).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table V.

Univariate and multivariate analysis of relapse-free survival using a Cox proportional hazards model in patients (N=124) with stage III colorectal cancer.

In breast cancer tissues, KRAS mutations strongly induce phosphorylation of YB-1 (24). Furthermore, Kashihara et al. demonstrated that the absence or presence of nuclear YB-1 expression correlates with differences in the progression-free survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (N=26) who were treated with gefitinib (29). In addition, these authors also suggested that nuclear YB-1 expression may influence the effectiveness of EGFR-targeted therapies (29). In our study, regarding EGFR and its relationship with nuclear YB-1 expression, we demonstrated that there was a tendency for the two to correlate with one another. In CRC, advances in treatment using molecularly targeted therapies have been made. However, further studies will be required to determine the mechanism(s) by which EGFR and KRAS mutations influence nuclear YB-1 translocation.

In conclusion, nuclear YB-1 expression is related to EGFR status and correlates with a poor prognosis in patients with stage III CRC. Nuclear YB-1 expression should be regarded as a potentially novel and useful biomarker for CRC. Moreover, it could be particularly beneficial for determining treatment options in predicting the effect of EGFR-targeted therapies, by detecting KRAS mutations in CRC. It will be necessary to further explore the relationship between KRAS mutations and nuclear YB-1 expression, as well as the effects of resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and molecularly targeted drugs.

Acknowledgements

The Authors wish to thank Dr. Kuwano (Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan) for providing the antibody against YB-1.

  • Received April 5, 2016.
  • Revision received May 23, 2016.
  • Accepted May 24, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. International Agency for Research on Cancer
    . 2012. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer Incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. [ONLINE] Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx (Accessed February 2, 2016).
  2. ↵
    1. Cunningham D,
    2. Atkin W,
    3. Lenz HJ,
    4. Lynch HT,
    5. Minsky B,
    6. Nordlinger B,
    7. Starling N
    : Colorectal cancer. Lancet 375: 1030-1047, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Spano JP,
    2. Lagorce C,
    3. Atlan D,
    4. Milano G,
    5. Domont J,
    6. Benamouzig R,
    7. Attar A,
    8. Benichou J,
    9. Martin A,
    10. Morere JF,
    11. Raphael M,
    12. Penault-Llorca F,
    13. Breau JL,
    14. Fagard R,
    15. Khayat D,
    16. Wind P
    : Impact of EGFR expression on colorectal cancer patient prognosis and survival. Ann Oncol 16: 102-108, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Yarden Y,
    2. Sliwkowski MX
    : Untangling the ErbB signalling network. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 127-137, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Hynes NE,
    2. Lane HA
    : ERBB receptors and cancer: the complexity of targeted inhibitors. Nat Rev Cancer 5: 341-354, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Matsumoto K,
    2. Wolffe AP
    : Gene regulation by Y-box proteins: coupling control of transcription and translation. Trends Cell Biol 8: 318-323, 1998.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Didier DK,
    2. Schiffenbauer J,
    3. Woulfe SL,
    4. Zacheis M,
    5. Schwartz BD
    : Characterization of the cDNA encoding a protein binding to the major histocompatibility complex class II Y box. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 7322-7326, 1988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma, 2nd English Edition, Kanehara & Co. Ltd., Tokyo, 2009.
  9. ↵
    1. Fujita T,
    2. Ito K,
    3. Izumi H,
    4. Kimura M,
    5. Sano M,
    6. Nakagomi H,
    7. Maeno K,
    8. Hama Y,
    9. Shingu K,
    10. Tsuchiya S,
    11. Kohno K,
    12. Fujimori M
    : Increased nuclear localization of transcription factor Y-box binding protein 1 accompanied by up-regulation of P-glycoprotein in breast cancer pretreated with paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res 11: 8837-8844, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Cybulski M,
    2. Jarosz B,
    3. Nowakowski A,
    4. Jeleniewicz W,
    5. Kutarska E,
    6. Bednarek W,
    7. Stepulak A
    : Cyclin A correlates with YB1, progression and resistance to chemotherapy in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Anticancer Res 35: 1715-1721, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kuwano M,
    2. Oda Y,
    3. Izumi H,
    4. Yang SJ,
    5. Uchiumi T,
    6. Iwamoto Y,
    7. Toi M,
    8. Fujii T,
    9. Yamana H,
    10. Kinoshita H,
    11. Kamura T,
    12. Tsuneyoshi M,
    13. Yasumoto K,
    14. Kohno K
    : The role of nuclear Y-box binding protein 1 as a global marker in drug resistance. Mol Cancer Ther 3: 1485-1492, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Yan X,
    2. Yan L,
    3. Zhou J,
    4. Liu S,
    5. Shan Z,
    6. Jiang C,
    7. Tian Y,
    8. Jin Z
    : High expression of Y-box-binding protein 1 is associated with local recurrence and predicts poor outcome in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Exp Path 7: 8715-8723, 2014.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Zhang Y,
    2. Zhao PW,
    3. Feng G,
    4. Xie G,
    5. Wang AQ,
    6. Yang YH,
    7. Wang D,
    8. Du XB
    : The expression level and prognostic value of Y-box binding protein-1 in rectal cancer. PloS one 10: e0119385, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Fujii T,
    2. Kawahara A,
    3. Basaki Y,
    4. Hattori S,
    5. Nakashima K,
    6. Nakano K,
    7. Shirouzu K,
    8. Kohno K,
    9. Yanagawa T,
    10. Yamana H,
    11. Nishio K,
    12. Ono M,
    13. Kuwano M,
    14. Kage M
    : Expression of HER2 and estrogen receptor alpha depends upon nuclear localization of Y-box binding protein-1 in human breast cancers. Cancer Res 68: 1504-1512, 2008.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Hyogotani A,
    2. Ito K,
    3. Yoshida K,
    4. Izumi H,
    5. Kohno K,
    6. Amano J
    : Association of nuclear YB-1 localization with lung resistance-related protein and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in lung cancer. Clin Lung Cancer 13: 375-384, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Maciejczyk A,
    2. Szelachowska J,
    3. Ekiert M,
    4. Matkowski R,
    5. Halon A,
    6. Lage H,
    7. Surowiak P
    : Elevated nuclear YB1 expression is associated with poor survival of patients with early breast cancer. Anticancer Res 32: 3177-3184, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Nishio S,
    2. Ushijima K,
    3. Yamaguchi T,
    4. Sasajima Y,
    5. Tsuda H,
    6. Kasamatsu T,
    7. Kage M,
    8. Ono M,
    9. Kuwano M,
    10. Kamura T
    : Nuclear Y-box-binding protein-1 is a poor prognostic marker and related to epidermal growth factor receptor in uterine cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 132: 703-708, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Koike K,
    2. Uchiumi T,
    3. Ohga T,
    4. Toh S,
    5. Wada M,
    6. Kohno K,
    7. Kuwano M
    : Nuclear translocation of the Y-box binding protein by ultraviolet irradiation. FEBS letters 417: 390-394, 1997.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Lyabin DN,
    2. Eliseeva IA,
    3. Ovchinnikov LP
    : YB-1 protein: functions and regulation. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews RNA 5: 95-110, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Eliseeva IA,
    2. Kim ER,
    3. Guryanov SG,
    4. Ovchinnikov LP,
    5. Lyabin DN
    : Y-box-binding protein 1 (YB-1) and its functions. Biochemistry Biokhimiia 76: 1402-1433, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Sutherland BW,
    2. Kucab J,
    3. Wu J,
    4. Lee C,
    5. Cheang MC,
    6. Yorida E,
    7. Turbin D,
    8. Dedhar S,
    9. Nelson C,
    10. Pollak M,
    11. Leighton Grimes H,
    12. Miller K,
    13. Badve S,
    14. Huntsman D,
    15. Blake-Gilks C,
    16. Chen M,
    17. Pallen CJ,
    18. Dunn SE
    : Akt phosphorylates the Y-box binding protein 1 at Ser102 located in the cold shock domain and affects the anchorage-independent growth of breast cancer cells. Oncogene 24: 4281-4292, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Basaki Y,
    2. Hosoi F,
    3. Oda Y,
    4. Fotovati A,
    5. Maruyama Y,
    6. Oie S,
    7. Ono M,
    8. Izumi H,
    9. Kohno K,
    10. Sakai K,
    11. Shimoyama T,
    12. Nishio K,
    13. Kuwano M
    : Akt-dependent nuclear localization of Y-box-binding protein 1 in acquisition of malignant characteristics by human ovarian cancer cells. Oncogene 26: 2736-2746, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Sinnberg T,
    2. Sauer B,
    3. Holm P,
    4. Spangler B,
    5. Kuphal S,
    6. Bosserhoff A,
    7. Schittek B
    : MAPK and PI3K/AKT mediated YB-1 activation promotes melanoma cell proliferation which is counteracted by an autoregulatory loop. Exp Dermatol 21: 265-270, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Toulany M,
    2. Schickfluss TA,
    3. Eicheler W,
    4. Kehlbach R,
    5. Schittek B,
    6. Rodemann HP
    : Impact of oncogenic K-RAS on YB-1 phosphorylation induced by ionizing radiation. Breast Cancer Res 13: R28, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Wu J,
    2. Lee C,
    3. Yokom D,
    4. Jiang H,
    5. Cheang MC,
    6. Yorida E,
    7. Turbin D,
    8. Berquin IM,
    9. Mertens PR,
    10. Iftner T,
    11. Gilks CB,
    12. Dunn SE
    : Disruption of the Y-box binding protein-1 results in suppression of the epidermal growth factor receptor and HER-2. Cancer Res 66: 4872-4879, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Spano JP,
    2. Fagard R,
    3. Soria JC,
    4. Rixe O,
    5. Khayat D,
    6. Milano G
    : Epidermal growth factor receptor signaling in colorectal cancer: preclinical data and therapeutic perspectives. Ann Oncol 16: 189-194, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Douillard JY,
    2. Siena S,
    3. Cassidy J,
    4. Tabernero J,
    5. Burkes R,
    6. Barugel M,
    7. Humblet Y,
    8. Bodoky G,
    9. Cunningham D,
    10. Jassem J,
    11. Rivera F,
    12. Kocakova I,
    13. Ruff P,
    14. Blasinska-Morawiec M,
    15. Smakal M,
    16. Canon JL,
    17. Rother M,
    18. Oliner KS,
    19. Wolf M,
    20. Gansert J
    : Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28: 4697-4705, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Liang YH,
    2. Lin YL,
    3. Liau JY,
    4. Tsai JH,
    5. Liang JT,
    6. Lin BR,
    7. Hung JS,
    8. Tseng LH,
    9. Lin LI,
    10. Chang YL,
    11. Cheng AL,
    12. Yeh KH
    : Cetuximab might be detrimental to metastatic colorectal cancer patients with KRAS codon 12 mutations. Anticancer Res 35: 4207-4214, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Kashihara M,
    2. Azuma K,
    3. Kawahara A,
    4. Basaki Y,
    5. Hattori S,
    6. Yanagawa T,
    7. Terazaki Y,
    8. Takamori S,
    9. Shirouzu K,
    10. Aizawa H,
    11. Nakano K,
    12. Kage M,
    13. Kuwano M,
    14. Ono M
    : Nuclear Y-box binding protein-1, a predictive marker of prognosis, is correlated with expression of HER2/ERBB2 AND HER3/ERBB3 in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol 4: 1066-1074, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (7)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 7
July 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nuclear Y-Box-binding Protein-1 Expression Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage III Colorectal Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
16 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Nuclear Y-Box-binding Protein-1 Expression Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage III Colorectal Cancer
SACHIKO SHIRAIWA, TETSUSHI KINUGASA, AKIHIKO KAWAHARA, TOMOAKI MIZOBE, TAKAFUMI OHCHI, KOTARO YUGE, SHINYA FUJINO, MITSUHIRO KATAGIRI, SUSUMU SHIMOMURA, KENSUKE TAJIRI, TOMOYA SUDO, MASAYOSHI KAGE, MICHIHIKO KUWANO, YOSHITO AKAGI
Anticancer Research Jul 2016, 36 (7) 3781-3788;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Nuclear Y-Box-binding Protein-1 Expression Predicts Poor Clinical Outcome in Stage III Colorectal Cancer
SACHIKO SHIRAIWA, TETSUSHI KINUGASA, AKIHIKO KAWAHARA, TOMOAKI MIZOBE, TAKAFUMI OHCHI, KOTARO YUGE, SHINYA FUJINO, MITSUHIRO KATAGIRI, SUSUMU SHIMOMURA, KENSUKE TAJIRI, TOMOYA SUDO, MASAYOSHI KAGE, MICHIHIKO KUWANO, YOSHITO AKAGI
Anticancer Research Jul 2016, 36 (7) 3781-3788;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Inhibition of Y Box Binding Protein 1 Suppresses Cell Growth and Motility in Colorectal Cancer
  • Y-box Binding Protein 1 Is Involved in Regulating the G2/M Phase of the Cell Cycle
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Flow Cytometric Analysis of Ovarian Cancer Ascites: Response of Mesothelial Cells and Macrophages to Cancer
  • Anti-tumor Effect of Intravenous Administration of CRM197 for Triple-negative Breast Cancer Therapy
  • An Antitumor 2-Hydroxyarylidene-4-cyclopentene-1,3-Dione as a Protein Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor: Interaction Between TX-1123 Derivatives and Src Kinase
Show more PROCEEDINGS OF THE 19TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE SOCIETY OF BIOTHERAPEUTIC APPROACHES, 5 December 2015 (Tokyo, Japan)

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Y-Box-binding protein-1
  • epidermal growth factor receptor
  • colorectal cancer
  • prognosis
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire