Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticlePROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL HAMBURG SYMPOSIUM ON TUMOR MARKERS, 19-21 October, 2014 (Hamburg, Germany)

FOXP3+ Cells Recruited by CCL22 into Breast Cancer Correlates with Less Tumor Nodal Infiltration

CHRISTOPH P. FREIER, CHRISTINA KUHN, STEFAN ENDRES, DORIS MAYR, KLAUS FRIESE, UDO JESCHKE and DAVID ANZ
Anticancer Research June 2016, 36 (6) 3139-3145;
CHRISTOPH P. FREIER
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
2Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CHRISTINA KUHN
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEFAN ENDRES
2Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DORIS MAYR
3Department of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KLAUS FRIESE
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
UDO JESCHKE
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: udo.jeschke{at}med.uni-muenchen.de
DAVID ANZ
2Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, Munich, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Regulatory T-cells (Tregs) are a T-cell subpopulation with suppressive capacities, which are specifically attracted by C-C motif chemokine 22 (CCL22). Treg infiltration of tumors is associated with a poor prognosis in many patients. We aimed to investigate whether CCL22 is expressed in human breast cancer and whether its presence is associated with Treg infiltration. Materials and Methods: Eighty paraffin-embedded human breast cancer samples were stained for CCL22 and for the Treg-specific transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FOXP3). Expression was evaluated in a semi-quantitative manner. Results: FOXP3+ cells infiltrated 50% of the breast tumors. Moreover, Treg infiltrated 93% of the tertiary lymphoid structures. CCL22 expression positively correlated with FOXP3+ cell infiltration into the tertiary lymphoid structures. Conclusion: Our results demonstrate that CCL22 expression correlates with infiltration by FOXP3+ cells. Interestingly, Treg presence negatively correlated with positive nodal status. In addition to their unfavorable role as mediators of evasion from antitumor immune response, Tregs might also have a beneficial role by reducing inflammation thereby limiting early tumor growth and spreading.

  • Regulatory T-cells
  • FOXP3
  • breast cancer
  • CCL22
  • immunohistochemistry
  • tertiary lymphoid structures

Worldwide, breast cancer is the most common invasive cancer in women, representing 23% of cancer diagnosed in women in 2012 (1). The same year, breast cancer resulted in 1.38 million diagnosed cases and 458,000 deaths worldwide (1). Survival rates in the developed world are high, between 80% and 90% of the women being alive 5 years after initial diagnosis (1, 2). However, since the 1970s the number of cases worldwide has significantly increased, possibly due to modern lifestyle, better detection, and longer lifespan, while the situation in developing countries remains problematic (3). Tumor development is a complex biological process that depends on acquired genetic abnormalities as well as the interplay between tumor cells, stromal cells and host immune cells (4). The role played by the immune system in cancer has been intensively studied and several studies have linked lymphocytic infiltrate in cancer tissues with a better outcome (5, 6). These infiltrating immune cells can participate in elimination of tumor cells and thus help control tumor growth (7). Consequently, acute tumor-directed immune responses involving cytotoxic T-lymphocytes appear to protect against tumor development, whereas immune responses involving chronic activation of humoral immunity, infiltration by T-helper type 2 cells (Th2), and pro-tumor-polarized innate inflammatory cells result in the promotion of tumor development and disease progression. Breast tumor is invaded by a diverse assortment of immune cells composed of both innate (myeloid) and adaptive (lymphoid) lineages (4). Innate immune cells, including macrophages, granulocytes, mast cells, dendritic cells and natural killer cells, normally represent the first line of defense against pathogens and foreign agents. These cells can locally secrete soluble factors such as cytokines, chemokines, bioactive mediators, and matrix-remodeling proteins that recruit additional leukocytes from the circulation.

Adaptive immune cells, involving cluster of differentiation 8 (CD8) cytotoxic T-lymphocytes and CD4 helper T-lymphocytes can be recruited by secreted soluble factors. They undeniably represent an attempt to eradicate transformed tumor cells. Unfortunately after a phase of equilibrium, the tumor is often eventually able to escape this immune response (8). In parallel, a growing body of literature has focused on the role played by regulatory T-cells (Tregs) because of their possible implication in this escape phenomenon. Tregs normally function to protect tissue from autoimmune diseases by suppressing self-reactive cells, including CD8 cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, B-cells and natural killer cells (9-11). In breast cancer, the dual role of Tregs, as assessed by forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) positivity, and CD8 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte infiltration has been described (12). In cancer tissues, the presence of high numbers of FOXP3+ T-cells predicts worse relapse-free survival and decreased overall survival. The C-C motif chemokine 22 (CCL22) can specifically attract Tregs and plays a role in the establishment of an immune privilege, associated with reduced overall survival in ovarian cancer (13, 14). The aim of this study was to analyze the CCL22 production in patients with breast cancer and draw a parallel with FOXP3+ cell infiltration and clinical parameters.

Materials and Methods

Patient data. Tissue samples from 80 formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded breast neoplasia biopsies from patients referred to the Gynecology Unit at Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich from 1991 to 2000, were included in this study. All cases had been previously characterized in terms of histology (grade, tumor size and lymph node infiltration by tumor cells) at the Department of Pathology, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich (Table I). Patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria (i.e. adequate routinely fixed biopsy material, no history of previous malignancy) were chosen on the basis of equal distribution among certain clinical pathological findings such as lymph node involvement, histopathological type (invasive ductal), and as far as possible estrogen/progesterone receptors status. All tumor samples were classified by the TNM system (15). The histological classification was determined according to a modification of the Elston and Ellis grading proposed by Bloom and Richardson (16). The hormone receptor status was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The tumor was classified as hormone receptor-positive in cases with positive staining in ≥10% of the tumor. The age of the patients ranged between 54 and 95 years. All of the patients were postmenopausal. Sections of 3 μm were assessed.

All material was sampled for diagnostic purposes and research was carried out in accordance with the legal requirements concerning confidential medical communication as well as the data protection act. Consequently, consulting the Ethics Committee of the Medical School, Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich, and written informed consent from the patients prior to participation in the study was not required.

Immunohistochemistry. Paraffin wax-embedded tissue slide samples were deparaffinized in xylol for 20 min, washed in 100% ethanol and then incubated in methanol/H2O2 (3%) for 20 min. After rehydration in an alcohol gradient to distilled water, the slides were placed in a pressure cooker containing sodium citrate buffer (pH=6.0) and heated for 5 min. Slides were washed twice in phosphate buffer solution (PBS) and blocked using blocking solution (Zytomed, Berlin, Germany) for 20 min. Each slide was separately incubated with a polyclonal rabbit primary antibody to human CCL22 (500-P107; Peprotech, Hamburg, Germany) diluted 1/200 in PBS, or a monoclonal mouse primary antibody to human FOXP3 (ab10563; Abcam, Cambridge, UK) diluted 1/300 in PBS. Incubation of the sections with the primary antibodies lasted for 16 h at 4°C. Subsequently, sections were washed twice in PBS before incubation with post-block reagent (Zytomed, Berlin, Germany) for 20 min. Finally, slides were washed in PBS and then incubated with the horseradish peroxidase-polymer (Zytomed, Berlin, Germany) for 30 min. Staining was performed using 3,3-diaminobenzidinesubstrate solution (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) for 180 sec. Counterstaining was carried out with Mayer's hemalaun for 2 min. Finally, sections were washed in tap water for 5 min and then dehydrated in an ascending alcohol series and washed in xylol. Slides were cover-slipped with Eukitt quick-hardening mounting medium (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA).

Positive controls were carried out with human tonsil sections. Negative controls were performed by replacement of the primary antibody and alternative incubation of the slides with IgG rabbit or mouse control antibodies (Biogenex, San Ramen, CA, USA).

The distribution of antigen expression was scored as following: 0: no staining; 1: few isolated CCL22/FOXP3+ cells; 2: moderate CCL22/FOXP3+ cell expression/infiltration; 3: strong CCL22/FOXP3+ cell expression/infiltration; 4: extreme CCL22/FOXP3+ cell expression/infiltration. Additionally, the intensity of CCL22 expression was evaluated as 0: none; 1: weak; 2: moderate; 3: strong, and multiplied with the distribution score to obtain the final scoring. Two independent investigators examined the sections using a Leitz Diaplan microscope (Leitz, Wetzlar, Germany). The concordance between investigators was almost 95%; in cases of different staining evaluation, both investigators re-evaluated slides until an agreement was reached (~5% of all cases).

Statistical analysis. Correlation of staining for the two antigens and their correlation with grading, age, tumor size, receptor status and nodal status were evaluated with the statistical program R (Version 0.98.1028; RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA, USA). The Mann–Whitney U-test was used for evaluation of two independent groups. Values with p<0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data are presented using the mean and standard deviation.

Results

CCL22 expression in breast cancer. A total of 75% of the studied breast cancer cases expressed CCL22 protein (i.e., at least some isolated cells). Differential expression of CCL22 in the cytoplasm of cells in human breast cancer assessed by immunoperoxidase staining is presented in Figure 1. The expression was highly variable, from no expression at all to very strong and diffuse expression. CCL22-producing cells looked like macrophages or dendritic cells, according to previous descriptions of these cells as being capable of CCL22 production (17). In the vast majority of patients, positively stained cells were mostly localized in the periphery, but in about 40% of the cases, they also infiltrated the tumor core. Notably, massive leukocyte infiltrations were generally present in the vicinity of CCL22-producing cells. Expression of CCL22 by tumor cells was observed, but was mostly limited to a diffuse expression concerning few tumor cells.

FOXP3+ cell infiltration in breast cancer. In 50% of the studied breast cancer cases, lymphocytes expressed FOXP3 protein (i.e. at least some isolated cells) in the nucleus. Differential expression of FOXP3 in the nucleus of lymphocytes in human breast cancer assessed by immunoperoxidase staining is presented in Figure 2. The expression was highly variable, from no expression at all to a very strong and diffuse expression. FOXP3+ cells all displayed the morphology of small lymphocytes, with large nuclei and very scarce cytoplasm. They were all very similar in appearance to the Tregs we observed in human tonsils. Tregs were found dispersed between decidual stromal cells or in the vicinity of blood vessels and, when grouped, were frequently associated with lymphocyte infiltration. Moreover, in cases with massive leukocyte infiltration, Tregs were present among the infiltrating cells in 93% of patients. These massive lymphocyte infiltrations were present in 69% of the patients and all presented characteristics of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical characteristics of the study population.

CCL22 expression is correlated with FOXP3+ cell infiltration of TLS. To further explore the role of CCL22 expression and FOXP3+ cell infiltration in breast cancer, we performed Spearman's rank correlation for CCL22 expression and FOXP3+ cell infiltration of the tumor core and FOXP3+ cell infiltration of TLS. We found CCL22 expression correlated with FOXP3+ cell infiltration, but only for cells recruited into the TLS (p=0.019) and not for cells recruited into the tumor core (p=0.434) as detailed in Table II. This result confirms the role of CCL22 expression in FOXP3+ cell infiltration into breast carcinoma.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Correlation of C-C motif chemokine 22 (CCL22) expression with regulatory T-cell (Treg) recruitment (Spearman linear regression). CCL22 staining was significantly positively correlated with Treg infiltration of tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Correlation of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ cell infiltration with clinical characteristics. FOXP3+ cell infiltration significantly negatively correlated with positive nodal status (Spearman linear regression).

FOXP3+ cell infiltration is correlated with nodal status. To better characterize the influence of FOXP3+ cell infiltration in breast cancer, we performed Spearman's rank correlation for FOXP3+ cell infiltration and other parameters, all available at the time of the surgery: higher grade as graded after pathological characterization, age at the onset of disease, size of resected tumor, and presence of infiltrating tumor cells in the local lymph node. The results are presented in Table III. We found no correlation between Treg infiltration and the clinical parameters considered, except for the nodal status as illustrated in Figure 3a. Women with nodal metastases had significantly less Treg infiltration in the primary breast tumor (p=0.019). We found no correlation between nodal status and CCL22 expression in the primary tumor (Figure 3b).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

C-C Motif chemokine 22 (CCL22) production in breast cancer. Expression of the CCL22 protein in macrophage-like cells in human breast cancer was assessed by immunoperoxidase staining: Negative control (tonsil) (a); positive control (tonsil) (b); no expression (c); low expression (d); intermediate expression (e); high expression (f). All at magnification: ×80.

Discussion

The results obtained during this histological study give an insight into the role of CCL22 in the recruitment of Tregs to breast cancer. The expression of CCL22 protein correlated with the Treg infiltration. Despite the central role played by chemokines in the immunoediting process, quantification of chemokine expression and associated immune cell recruitment are not yet used in the clinic. Interestingly, we found a very high infiltration of Tregs in breast cancer. Moreover, Treg infiltration was positively associated with CCL22 expression and negatively associated with nodal status.

The immune system is present and functional against the tumor in patients with breast cancer and may promote both humoral and cellular responses (18, 19). However, it is less clear how a tumor can avoid destruction by these cells and even turn the regulatory mechanisms of the immune system to its own advantage. One hypothesis is that the production of CCL22 that results in Treg recruitment allows the tumor to evade the early antitumor immune response (20).

On the other hand, it is well established that chronic infiltration of tissue by some innate immune cell types (e.g., immature monocytes, macrophages, mast cells or neutrophils) contributes to cancer development (21, 22). Indeed, a potential tumor-enhancing effect of adaptive immunity has already been observed after passive transfer of tumor-specific antibodies in vivo (23). Thus, CCL22 production by innate immune cells might also protect, for a time at least, from quick growth and spreading of tumor cells.

T-Cell infiltration into breast tumor has been extensively described and these cells can represent a very large proportion of the total immune cell infiltration (24). In proliferating tumors, the presence of T-lymphocytes might represent a good prognostic indicator (25). However, great variations in such infiltration were observed, particularly with regard to the Treg population, which might affect both disease progression and overall survival, sometimes leading to confusing results (12, 26, 27). These cells can be recruited from the periphery by CCL22 produced in the tumor, leading to the creation of an immunosuppressive milieu, favorable to tumor growth (13, 14). However, the activation and proliferation of Tregs in tumor might also play a role in tumor development (27). Because the antigen specificity of tumour infiltrating Tregs has not been established in humans, these cells may have opposing effects depending on the tumor microenvironment: they may be deleterious when they block antitumor effector T-cells, or beneficial when they reduce chronic inflammation (4).

Figure 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 2.

Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ cell infiltration in breast cancer. Expression of FOXP3 in the nucleus of lymphocytes in human breast cancer was assessed by immunoperoxidase staining: Negative control (tonsil) (a); positive control (tonsil) (b); no expression (c); low expression (d); intermediate expression (e); high expression (f). All at ×80 magnification.

We found no correlation between Treg infiltration and the clinical parameters considered here (namely grading, age, receptor expression and tumor size). An interesting finding was the negative correlation of Treg infiltration with nodal status. The detection of metastatic tumor cells present in lymph nodes is routinely used in the surgical management of breast cancer (28). In addition to metastatic cells, lymph nodes are also directly exposed to soluble factors released by primary tumor, such growth factor, and other cytokines (29, 30).

A low number or absence of Tregs in primary tumor could open the way to development of chronic inflammation, led by some innate immune cell types, therefore contributing to cancer development and spread to local lymph nodes. One limitation of this study is the absence of information on such an inflammatory condition, that should be further evaluated. Nevertheless, this work suggests that CCL22 could be evaluated as a target for tumor therapy, with respect to its implication in the recruitment of Tregs.

In summary, we found a positive correlation between CCL22 production and Treg infiltration in human breast cancer. Tregs were preferentially attracted into TLS, in the vicinity of the CCL22-producing cells. Interestingly, we found a negative correlation between Treg infiltration and nodal status, which could possibly result from the chronic inflammation in the primary tumor. Thus Treg, in addition to their unfavorable role as mediators of evasion from antitumor immune response, might also have a beneficial role, reducing inflammation and therefore limiting early tumor growth and spreading. The precise role of Treg in breast cancer development, however, should be better evaluated before their full prognostic value can be established. Tregs might have a more complex role in breast cancer than simply helping to establish an immunosuppressive milieu and patients could greatly benefit from better understanding of their role in the disease course.

Figure 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 3.

Forkhead box P3 (FOXP3)+ (a) and C-C Motif chemokine 22 (CCL22) (b) score according to nodal status in women with breast cancer. FOXP3+ cell infiltration is reduced in women with positive nodal status. Boxplot with error bars indicating standard deviation. Mann–Whitney U-test. *p<0.05; n.s.: not significant.

Acknowledgements

The work presented here is part of the Ph.D. thesis of CPF and was supported by a Ph.D. stipend of the DFG (Graduiertenkolleg 1202). This work was presented at the 16th Hamburger Symposium on Tumor Markers, Hamburg (2014) under the title “CCL22 Expression and FOXP3+ Cell Infiltration in Human Breast Cancer.

Footnotes

  • ↵* These Authors contributed equally to this study.

  • Conflicts of Interest

    The Authors declare no conflicts of interest with regard to this study.

  • Received February 17, 2016.
  • Revision received May 7, 2016.
  • Accepted May 13, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. McGuire A,
    2. Brown JA,
    3. Malone C,
    4. McLaughlin R,
    5. Kerin MJ
    : Effects of age on the detection and management of breast cancer. Cancers 7(2): 908-929, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Chen L,
    2. Linden HM,
    3. Anderson BO,
    4. Li CI
    : Trends in 5-year survival rates among breast cancer patients by hormone receptor status and stage. Breast Cancer Res Treat 147: 609-616, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. DeSantis CE,
    2. Lin CC,
    3. Mariotto AB,
    4. Siegel RL,
    5. Stein KD,
    6. Kramer JL,
    7. Alteri R,
    8. Robbins AS,
    9. Jemal A
    : Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64(4): 252-271, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fridman WH,
    2. Pagès F,
    3. Sautès-Fridman C,
    4. Galon J
    : The immune contexture in human tumours: impact on clinical outcome. Nat Rev Cancer 12: 298-306, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Pagès F,
    2. Berger A,
    3. Camus M,
    4. Sanchez-Cabo F,
    5. Costes A,
    6. Molidor R,
    7. Mlecnik B,
    8. Kirilovsky A,
    9. Nilsson M,
    10. Damotte D,
    11. Meatchi T,
    12. Bruneval P,
    13. Cugnenc P-H,
    14. Trajanoski Z,
    15. Fridman W-H,
    16. Galon J
    : Effector memory T-cells, early metastasis, and survival in colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 353: 2654-2666, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. DeNardo DG,
    2. Coussens LM
    : Inflammation and breast cancer. Balancing immune response: crosstalk between adaptive and innate immune cells during breast cancer progression. Breast Cancer Res 9(4): 212, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Zitvogel L,
    2. Kroemer G
    : Introduction: the immune response against dying cells. Curr Opin Immunol 20: 501-503, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Dunn GP,
    2. Old LJ,
    3. Schreiber RD
    : The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. Immunity 21: 137-148, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Trzonkowski P,
    2. Szmit E,
    3. Mysliwska J,
    4. Dobyszuk A,
    5. Mysliwski A
    : CD4+CD25+ T-regulatory cells inhibit cytotoxic activity of T CD8+ and NK lymphocytes in the direct cell-to-cell interaction. Clin Immunol 112: 258-267, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lim HW,
    2. Hillsamer P,
    3. Banham AH,
    4. Kim CH
    : Cutting edge: direct suppression of B-cells by CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells. J Immunol 175: 4180-4183, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Azuma T,
    2. Takahashi T,
    3. Kunisato A,
    4. Kitamura T,
    5. Hirai H
    : Human CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T-cells suppress NKT cell functions. Cancer Res 63: 4516-4520, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Bates GJ,
    2. Fox SB,
    3. Han C,
    4. Leek RD,
    5. Garcia JF,
    6. Harris AL,
    7. Banham AH
    : Quantification of regulatory T-cells enables the identification of highrisk breast cancer patients and those at risk of late relapse. J Clin Oncol 24: 5373-5380, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Iellem A,
    2. Mariani M,
    3. Lang R,
    4. Recalde H,
    5. Panina-Bordignon P,
    6. Sinigaglia F,
    7. D'Ambrosio D
    : Unique chemotactic response profile and specific expression of chemokine receptors CCR4 and CCR8 by CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T-cells. J Exp Med 194: 847-853, 2001.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Curiel TJ,
    2. Coukos G,
    3. Zou L,
    4. Alvarez X,
    5. Cheng P,
    6. Mottram P,
    7. Evdemon-Hogan M,
    8. Conejo-Garcia JR,
    9. Zhang L,
    10. Burow M,
    11. Zhu Y,
    12. Wei S,
    13. Kryczek I,
    14. Daniel B,
    15. Gordon A,
    16. Myers L,
    17. Lackner A,
    18. Disis ML,
    19. Knutson KL,
    20. Chen L,
    21. Zou W
    : Specific recruitment of regulatory T-cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat Med 10: 942-949, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Sobin LH,
    2. Gospodarowicz MK,
    3. Wittekind Ch
    : TNM Classification of Malignant Tumors. 7th ed. Wiley-Blackwell, 2009.
  15. ↵
    1. Bloom HJ,
    2. Richardson WW
    : Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer; A study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years. Br J Cancer 11(3): 359-377, 1957.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Godiska R,
    2. Chantry D,
    3. Raport CJ,
    4. Sozzani S,
    5. Allavena P,
    6. Leviten D,
    7. Mantovani A,
    8. Gray PW
    : Human macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC), a novel chemoattractant for monocytes, monocyte-derived dendritic cells, and natural killer cells. J Exp Med 185(9): 1595-1604, 1997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Bell D,
    2. Chomarat P,
    3. Broyles D,
    4. Netto G,
    5. Harb GM,
    6. Lebecque S,
    7. Valladeau J,
    8. Davoust J,
    9. Palucka KA,
    10. Banchereau J
    : In breast carcinoma tissue, immature dendritic cells reside within the tumor, whereas mature dendritic cells are located in peritumoral areas: J Exp Med 190: 1417-1426, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Ben-Hur H,
    2. Cohen O,
    3. Schneider D,
    4. Gurevich P,
    5. Halperin R,
    6. Bala U,
    7. Mozes M,
    8. Zusman I
    : The role of lymphocytes and macrophages in human breast tumorigenesis: an immunohistochemical and morphometric study. Anticancer Res 22: 1231-1238, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Faget J,
    2. Biota C,
    3. Bachelot T,
    4. Gobert M,
    5. Treilleux I,
    6. Goutagny N,
    7. Durand I,
    8. Léon-Goddard S,
    9. Blay JY,
    10. Caux C,
    11. Ménétrier-Caux C
    : Early detection of tumor cells by innate immune cells leads to T(reg) recruitment through CCL22 production by tumor cells. Cancer Res 71: 6143-6152, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Coussens LM,
    2. Werb Z
    : Inflammation and cancer. Nature 420(6917): 860-867, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Balkwill F,
    2. Charles KA,
    3. Mantovani A
    : Smoldering and polarized inflammation in the initiation and promotion of malignant disease. Cancer Cell 7: 211-217, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Siegel CT,
    2. Schreiber K,
    3. Meredith SC,
    4. Beck-Engeser GB,
    5. Lancki DW,
    6. Lazarski CA,
    7. Fu YX,
    8. Rowley DA,
    9. Schreiber H
    : Enhanced growth of primary tumors in cancer-prone mice after immunization against the mutant region of an inherited oncoprotein. J Exp Med 191: 1945-1956, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Chin Y,
    2. Janseens J,
    3. Vandepitte J,
    4. Vandenbrande J,
    5. Opdebeek L,
    6. Raus J
    : Phenotypic analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from human breast cancer. Anticancer Res 12(5): 1463-1466, 1992.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Ali HR,
    2. Provenzano E,
    3. Dawson S-J,
    4. Blows FM,
    5. Liu B,
    6. Shah M,
    7. Earl HM,
    8. Poole CJ,
    9. Hiller L,
    10. Dunn JA,
    11. Bowden SJ,
    12. Twelves C,
    13. Bartlett JMS,
    14. Mahmoud SMA,
    15. Rakha E,
    16. Ellis IO,
    17. Liu S,
    18. Gao D,
    19. Nielsen TO,
    20. Pharoah PDP,
    21. Caldas C
    : Association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and breast cancer survival in 12,439 patients. Ann Oncol 25: 1536-1543, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Mahmoud SMA,
    2. Paish EC,
    3. Powe DG,
    4. Macmillan RD,
    5. Lee AHS,
    6. Ellis IO,
    7. Green AR
    : An evaluation of the clinical significance of FOXP3+ infiltrating cells in human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 127: 99-108, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Gobert M,
    2. Treilleux I,
    3. Bendriss-Vermare N,
    4. Bachelot T,
    5. Goddard-Leon S,
    6. Arfi V,
    7. Biota C,
    8. Doffin AC,
    9. Durand I,
    10. Olive D,
    11. Perez S,
    12. Pasqual N,
    13. Faure C,
    14. Ray-Coquard I,
    15. Puisieux A,
    16. Caux C,
    17. Blay J-Y,
    18. Ménétrier-Caux C
    : Regulatory T-cells recruited through CCL22/CCR4 are selectively activated in lymphoid infiltrates surrounding primary breast tumors and lead to an adverse clinical outcome. Cancer Res 69: 2000-2009, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Khan SA,
    2. Eladoumikdachi F
    : Optimal surgical treatment of breast cancer: implications for local control and survival. J Surg Oncol 101: 677-686, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ohm JE,
    2. Carbone DP
    : VEGF as a mediator of tumor-associated immunodeficiency. Immunol Res 23: 263-272, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kim R,
    2. Emi M,
    3. Tanabe K,
    4. Arihiro K
    : Immunobiology of the sentinel lymph node and its potential role for antitumour immunity. Lancet Oncol 7: 1006-1016, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 6
June 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
FOXP3+ Cells Recruited by CCL22 into Breast Cancer Correlates with Less Tumor Nodal Infiltration
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
15 + 1 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
FOXP3+ Cells Recruited by CCL22 into Breast Cancer Correlates with Less Tumor Nodal Infiltration
CHRISTOPH P. FREIER, CHRISTINA KUHN, STEFAN ENDRES, DORIS MAYR, KLAUS FRIESE, UDO JESCHKE, DAVID ANZ
Anticancer Research Jun 2016, 36 (6) 3139-3145;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
FOXP3+ Cells Recruited by CCL22 into Breast Cancer Correlates with Less Tumor Nodal Infiltration
CHRISTOPH P. FREIER, CHRISTINA KUHN, STEFAN ENDRES, DORIS MAYR, KLAUS FRIESE, UDO JESCHKE, DAVID ANZ
Anticancer Research Jun 2016, 36 (6) 3139-3145;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Induced electric fields inhibit breast cancer growth and metastasis by modulating the immune tumor microenvironment
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Expression of DOG1 (Using SP31) in Poorly Differentiated Carcinoma of the Head and Neck
  • Expression of the Tumor-associated Mucin 1 Epitope Analyzed with the Humanized PankoMab-GEX™ Antibody in Malignant and Normal Tissues of the Head and Neck
  • New Marker Genes for Real-Time PCR-based Detection of Circulating Tumour Cells from Blood of Breast Cancer Patients
Show more PROCEEDINGS OF THE 16TH INTERNATIONAL HAMBURG SYMPOSIUM ON TUMOR MARKERS, 19-21 October, 2014 (Hamburg, Germany)

Keywords

  • Regulatory T-cells
  • Foxp3
  • Breast cancer
  • CCL22
  • immunohistochemistry
  • Tertiary lymphoid structures
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire