Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Prognostic Factors After Definitive Radio(Chemo)Therapy of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

DANIEL SEIDL, STEFAN JANSSEN, PRIMOZ STROJAN, AMIRA BAJROVIC, STEVEN E. SCHILD and DIRK RADES
Anticancer Research May 2016, 36 (5) 2523-2526;
DANIEL SEIDL
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEFAN JANSSEN
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
2Medical Practice for Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Hannover, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
PRIMOZ STROJAN
3Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AMIRA BAJROVIC
4Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
STEVEN E. SCHILD
5Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, U.S.A.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DIRK RADES
1Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rades.dirk@gmx.net
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To identify predictors of locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS) after definitive radio(chemo)therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Patients and Methods: Two hundred and seventy-five patients were evaluated; 261 patients received radiochemotherapy with 30-40 mg/m2 of cisplatin weekly, three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2, two courses of cisplatin 5x20 mg/m2 or two courses of cisplatin 5×20 mg/m2plus 5-fluorouracil. Ten characteristics were analyzed: Pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin, T-/N-category, Karnofsky performance-score (KPS), gender, age, chemotherapy type, tumor site, grading and radiation dose. Results: On multivariate analyses, hemoglobin 12-14 g/dl (p=0.040), lower T-category (p=0.010), lower N-category (p=0.042) and female gender (p=0.006) were predictive of LRC. Hemoglobin >12 g/dl (p=0.020), lower N-category (p<0.001), KPS ≥80 (p<0.001), female gender (p=0.024) and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 or 5×20 mg/m2 (p<0.001) were predictors of improved OS. Conclusion: Predictors of LRC and OS were identified that can improve personalization of treatment. Since chemotherapy type was associated with OS, studies comparing different regimens are warranted.

  • Locally advanced SCCHN
  • definitive radio(chemo) therapy
  • prognostic factors
  • locoregional control
  • overall survival

The most common treatments for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) include surgical resection followed by radio(chemo)therapy and definitive radio(chemo)therapy (1). The preference of treatment approaches depends on local expertise, national and institutional standards. Often, patients receiving definitive radio(chemo)therapy have large unresectable primary tumors, extensive lymphadenopathy, poorer performance and higher comorbidity than patients considered suitable for resection. Therefore, many patients treated with definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced SCCHN have a poor prognosis, requiring further research. In addition to modern radiation techniques and novel anticancer drugs, the use of more individualized treatment approaches can lead to better outcomes after definitive radio(chemo) therapy for patients with SCCHN (2-4). Besides age, comorbidity, personal situation and treatment preference, individualized therapeutic approaches should take into account the expected outcomes of treatment, such as locoregional control (LRC) and overall survival (OS). Both LRC and OS can be estimated with profound knowledge of independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, the most appropriate radiation dose and type of concurrent chemotherapy are critical to understand. This study analyzed the prognostic role of radiation dose, different dosing regimens of cisplatin-based chemotherapy and additional potential prognostic factors on LRC and OS in patients receiving definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced SCCHN.

Patients and Methods

Two hundred and seventy-five patients who received definitive radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced SCCHN were evaluated for LRC and OS in this retrospective study. Irradiation was performed as conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy per weekday) three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Total radiation doses administered to the primary tumor and the involved lymph nodes ranged between 60 Gy and 70 Gy. Doses given to non-involved intermediate-risk and high-risk lymph nodes were 50 Gy and 60 Gy, respectively. All but 14 patients received simultaneous chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy, either with cisplatin weekly (30-40 mg/m2 each week), three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 (days 1, 22 and 43), two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 (days 1-5 and 29-33) or two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 supplemented by 600/1,000 mg/m2 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (days 1-5 and 29-33).

Ten characteristics were analyzed for potential associations with LRC and OS, including pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level (<12 g/dl versus 12-14 g/dl vs. >14 g/dl), T-category (T1/T2 versus T3/T4), N-category (N0/N1/N2a vs. N2b/N2c/N3), Karnofsky performance-score (≤70 versus ≥80), gender, age (≤57 years versus ≥58 years, median age=57 years), type of chemotherapy (none versus cisplatin weekly versus cisplatin 100 mg/m2 versus cisplatin 20 mg/m2 versus cisplatin 20 mg/m2 plus 5-FU), primary tumor site (oropharynx versus hypopharynx versus larynx versus oral cavity/floor of mouth), histologic grading (G1/G2 versus G3) and total radiation dose (60-66 Gy versus 70 Gy).

The Kaplan-Meier method plus the log-rank test were applied for univariate analyses of LRC and OS (5). Characteristics showing a significant association (p<0.05) with LRC or OS were also included in a multivariate analysis performed with the Cox proportional hazards model.

Results

The LRC rates in the entire series were 73%, 60% and 58%, respectively, after 1, 3 and 5 years following irradiation. On univariate analyses, LRC was positively associated with a pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level of 12-14 g/dl (p=0.003), lower T-category (p=0.029), lower N-category (p=0.020) and female gender (p=0.009). Results of the univariate analyses of LRC are shown in Table I. On the multivariate analysis, pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level (p=0.040), T-category (p=0.010), N-category (p=0.042) and gender (p=0.006) proved to be independent predictors of LRC (Table II).

OS rates after 1, 3 and 5 years were 76%, 50% and 36%, respectively. In the univariate analyses, OS was positively associated with pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl and >14 g/dl (p=0.019), lower N-category (p<0.001), a KPS of ≥80 (p<0.001), female gender (p=0.045), chemotherapy with three courses of cisplatin 100 mg/m2 or two courses of cisplatin 20 mg/m2 (p=0.009) and larynx or oropharynx cancer (p<0.001). The results of the univariate analyses of OS are summarized in Table III. In the multivariate analysis of OS, pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin level (p=0.020), N-category (p<0.001), KPS (p<0.001), gender (p=0.024) and type of simultaneous chemotherapy (p<0.001) were significant predictors, whereas the primary tumor site did not achieve significance (p=0.57). The complete results of multivariate analyses of OS are shown in Table IV.

Discussion

The prognoses of patients with SCCHN presenting with distant metastases or locally advanced unresectable disease are generally poor and require improvement (1-3, 6-8). For locally advanced disease, modern techniques of head-and-neck surgery and radiotherapy have already led to improved outcomes, which may be further enhanced with new chemotherapy approaches (9, 10). The application of personalized treatment programs may also result in better outcomes. Such programs should consider an individual patient's specific situation, including his prognosis. Therefore, the identification of prognostic factors is important. In this study, several potential predictors for LRC and OS were analyzed. In the multivariate analysis of LRC, pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl, lower T-category, lower N-category and female gender were independent prognostic factors. In the multivariate analysis of OS, pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin levels of >12 g/dl, lower N-category, KPS ≥80, female gender and the type of the concurrent chemotherapy were independent predictors. These results widely agree with those of previous studies of treatment of SCCHN demonstrating consistency of the results of this study (11-13). An impact of the tumor stage on outcomes was already shown for patients with locally advanced SCCHN. The prognostic role of the pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin was also reported before, for which two interpretations exist. The hemoglobin level may be a surrogate marker for more advanced underlying disease. However, it has also been suggested that hemoglobin levels are important for tumor oxygenation, which is important for the efficacy of radiation therapy (14, 15). The effect of irradiation widely depends on the induction of oxygen free radicals that lead to damage of the tumor cell DNA and, subsequently, the tumor cell itself. It is well-recognized that anemia, which is associated with a reduced oxygen-carrier capacity, has a detrimental effect on tumor cell oxygenation (14). In addition, it has been suggested that high concentrations of hemoglobin may also have a negative impact on tumor cell oxygenation due to a reduced perfusion of the small capillaries (16). Hemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl or 13-15 g/dl have been considered optimal for tumor oxygenation. Indeed, in the present study, hemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl were associated with a better LRC than levels >14 g/dl and <12 g/dl. This result supports the idea of an optimal range of hemoglobin levels in the light of tumor cell oxygenation. With respect to OS, both hemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl and >14 g/dl were superior to levels <12 g/dl, while the OS rates for 12-14 g/dl and >14 g/dl were similar. Thus, in addition to the aspect of tumor cell oxygenation, the hemoglobin level may also be a surrogate marker for advanced disease.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Univariate analysis of locoregional control.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Multivariate analysis of locoregional control.

In the present study, the radiochemotherapy protocols, including three courses of 100 mg/m2 cisplatin (on days 1, 22 and 43) or two courses of 20 mg/m2 cisplatin (on days 1-5 and 29-33), resulted in better OS than the protocols that included weekly administration of cisplatin or cisplatin plus 5-FU. However, the retrospective design of the current study must be taken into account when using these findings to recommend a chemotherapy regimen. Additional (matched-pair) studies should be performed directly comparing two radiochemotherapy programs.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate analysis of survival.

In contrast to other significant predictors, the total radiation dose (70 Gy vs. 60-66 Gy) had no significant impact on LRC or OS. This finding may be due to the relatively small number of patients (n=38) who received doses of 60-66 Gy. However, it may also be true that a total dose of 66 Gy is sufficient for definitive radio(chemo)therapy of advanced SCCHN when administered with chemotherapy. A randomized trial comparing 66 Gy to 70 Gy for definitive treatment of SCCHN is recommended.

In conclusion, this study demonstrated the prognostic significance of the pre-radiotherapy hemoglobin levels for definitive treatment of SCCHN. Furthermore, concurrent chemotherapy is mandatory to achieve optimal results. Cisplatin alone with three courses of 100 mg/m2 (on days 1, 22 and 43) or two courses of 20 mg/m2 (on days 1-5 and 29-33) appear most effective. However, further studies are required to identify the optimal chemotherapy program. A total radiation dose of 70 Gy may not be superior to lower doses, which needs to be properly investigated in a future randomized trial. These findings, regarding prognostic factors, can aid treatment recommendations and stratification of groups when designing prospective trials.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table IV.

Multivariate analysis of survival.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    On behalf of all Authors, the corresponding Author states that there are no conflicts of interest related to this study.

  • Received March 10, 2016.
  • Revision received April 11, 2016.
  • Accepted April 13, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Siegel RL,
    2. Miller KD,
    3. Jemal A
    : Cancer statistics, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin 65: 5-29, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Song JH,
    2. Jeong BK,
    3. Choi HS,
    4. Jeong H,
    5. Kang MH,
    6. Kang JH,
    7. Kim JP,
    8. Park JJ,
    9. Woo SH,
    10. Jang HS,
    11. Choi BO,
    12. Kang KM
    : Comparison of failure patterns between conventional and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage III and IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Anticancer Res 35: 6833-6840, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Fehlauer F,
    3. Wroblesky J,
    4. Albers D,
    5. Schild SE,
    6. Schmidt R
    : Prognostic factors in head-and-neck cancer patients treated with surgery followed by intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), 3D-conformal radiotherapy, or conventional radiotherapy. Oral Oncol 43: 535-543, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Chen LY,
    2. Huang CC,
    3. Tsou YA,
    4. Bau DT,
    5. Tsai MH
    : Prognostic factor of severe complications in patients with hypopharyngeal cancer with primary concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Anticancer Res 35: 1735-1741, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Kaplan EL,
    2. Meier P
    : Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53: 457-481, 1958.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  6. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Schild SE,
    3. Karstens JH,
    4. Hakim SG
    : Predicting survival of patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression from cancer of the head-and-neck. Anticancer Res 35: 385-388, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rades D,
    2. Dziggel L,
    3. Hakim SG,
    4. Rudat V,
    5. Janssen S,
    6. Trang NT,
    7. Khoa MT,
    8. Bartscht T
    : Predicting survival after irradiation for brain metastases from head and neck cancer. In Vivo 29: 525-528, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Tribius S,
    2. Kronemann S,
    3. Kilic Y,
    4. Schroeder U,
    5. Hakim S,
    6. Schild SE,
    7. Rades D
    : Radiochemotherapy including cisplatin alone versus cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced unresectable stage IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Strahlenther Onkol 185: 675-681, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Franco P,
    2. Potenza I,
    3. Schena M,
    4. Riva G,
    5. Pecorari G,
    6. Demo PG,
    7. Fasolis M,
    8. Moretto F,
    9. Garzaro M,
    10. Di Muzio J,
    11. Melano M,
    12. Airoldi M,
    13. Ragona R,
    14. Rampino M,
    15. Ricardi U
    : Induction chemotherapy and sequential concomitant chemo-radiation in locally advanced head and neck cancers: How induction-phase intensity and treatment breaks may impact on clinical outcomes. Anticancer Res 35: 6247-6254, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Fujimoto Y,
    2. Kato S,
    3. Itoh Y,
    4. Naganawa S,
    5. Nakashima T
    : A phase I study of concurrent chemoradiotherapy using oral s-1 for head and neck cancer. Anticancer Res 34: 209-213, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Seibold ND,
    3. Gebhard MP,
    4. Noack F,
    5. Schild SE,
    6. Thorns C
    : Prognostic factors (including HPV status) for irradiation of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Strahlenther Onkol 187: 626-632, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Leemans CR,
    2. Tiwari R,
    3. Nauta JJ,
    4. van der Waal I,
    5. Snow GB
    : Regional lymph node involvement and its significance in the development of distant metastases in head and neck carcinoma. Cancer 71: 452-456, 1993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Rades D,
    2. Kronemann S,
    3. Meyners T,
    4. Bohlen G,
    5. Tribius S,
    6. Kazic N,
    7. Schroeder U,
    8. Hakim SG,
    9. Schild SE,
    10. Dunst J
    : Comparison of four cisplatin-based radiochemotherapy regimens for nonmetastatic stage III/IV squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 80: 1037-1044, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Kelleher DK,
    3. Höckel M
    : Oxygen status of malignant tumors: pathogenesis of hypoxia and significance for tumor therapy. Semin Oncol 28(2 Suppl 8): 29-35, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Becker A,
    2. Stadler P,
    3. Lavay RS,
    4. Hänsgen G,
    5. Kuhnt T,
    6. Lautenschläger C,
    7. Feldmann HJ,
    8. Molls M,
    9. Dunst J
    : Severe anemia is associated with poor tumor oxygenation in head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46: 459-466, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Vaupel P,
    2. Mayer A,
    3. Höckel M
    : Impact of hemoglobin levels on tumor oxygenation: the higher, the better? Strahlenther Onkol 182: 63-71, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (5)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 5
May 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Factors After Definitive Radio(Chemo)Therapy of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 4 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Factors After Definitive Radio(Chemo)Therapy of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
DANIEL SEIDL, STEFAN JANSSEN, PRIMOZ STROJAN, AMIRA BAJROVIC, STEVEN E. SCHILD, DIRK RADES
Anticancer Research May 2016, 36 (5) 2523-2526;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Factors After Definitive Radio(Chemo)Therapy of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
DANIEL SEIDL, STEFAN JANSSEN, PRIMOZ STROJAN, AMIRA BAJROVIC, STEVEN E. SCHILD, DIRK RADES
Anticancer Research May 2016, 36 (5) 2523-2526;
Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Palliative Local Radiotherapy for Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head-and-Neck: Prognostic Factors of Survival
  • Accelerated Fractionation With Concomitant Boost vs. Conventional Radio-chemotherapy for Definitive Treatment of Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head-and-Neck (SCCHN)
  • Clinical Prognostic Factors for Local Control and Survival After Irradiation of Grade II Gliomas
  • A Simple Clinical Instrument to Predict the Survival Probability of Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases
  • A Tool to Predict the Probability of Intracerebral Recurrence or New Cerebral Metastases After Whole-brain Irradiation in Patients with Head-and-Neck Cancer
  • Hyperfractionated or Accelerated Hyperfractionated Re-irradiation with >=42 Gy in Combination with Paclitaxel for Secondary/Recurrent Head-and-Neck Cancer
  • A New Prognostic Instrument Specifically Designed for Patients Irradiated for Recurrent Carcinoma of the Bladder
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib After Progression on First-line Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
  • Efficacy and Safety of Platinum-based Chemotherapy With Bevacizumab Followed by Bevacizumab Maintenance for Recurrent Ovarian, Fallopian Tube, and Primary Peritoneal Cancer During PARP Inhibitor Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
  • Real-world Data of Palliative First-line Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Locally advanced SCCHN
  • definitive radio(chemo) therapy
  • prognostic factors
  • locoregional control
  • overall survival
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire