Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Testing of a Novel Cancer Metastatic Multiplex Panel for the Detection of Bone-metastatic Disease – a Pilot Study

JINDRA WINDRICHOVA, RADKA FUCHSOVA, RADEK KUCERA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, ONDREJ FIALA, JINDRICH FINEK, DAGMAR SLIPKOVA, MARIE KARLIKOVA and JANA SVOBODOVA
Anticancer Research April 2016, 36 (4) 1973-1978;
JINDRA WINDRICHOVA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RADKA FUCHSOVA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RADEK KUCERA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ONDREJ TOPOLCAN
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: topolcan@fnplzen.cz
ONDREJ FIALA
2Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
3Biomedical Center, Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JINDRICH FINEK
2Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DAGMAR SLIPKOVA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIE KARLIKOVA
1Laboratory of Immunoanalysis, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical School and Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Charles University in Prague, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JANA SVOBODOVA
4Osteocenter, Second Internal Clinic, Teaching Hospital in Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Background: Bone metastases develop in several malignancies (multiple myeloma, breast, prostate and lung carcinoma) and cause several complications. The aim of this study was to search for new biomarkers to use in monitoring of bone metastatic disease with the use of xMAP technology. Patients and Methods: We assessed 62 oncological patients: 23 with no bone metastases, 28 with metastatic disease not having undergone therapy and 11 with metastatic disease treated by denosumab. Serum levels of dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteonectin, periostin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP5), tumor necrosis factor related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL40), carboxy-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP) were measured in each sample. Results: The following biomarkers were observed to have significantly higher levels in the groups of patients with metastases in comparison to metastasis-free patients: GDF15 (p<0.0001), osteonectin (p=0.0311), TRAP5 (p<0.0046), TWEAK (p<0.0343) and YKL40 (p<0.0034). The changes in DKK1, NSE, OPG and periostin were not significant. Conclusion: We identified five new biomarkers: GDF15, osteonectin, TRAP5, TWEAK, and YKL40 as being promising markers for monitoring bone metastases.

  • Cancer
  • bone metastasis
  • scintigraphy
  • biomarkers
  • multiplex technology

Bone metastases develop in several malignancies, most commonly in multiple myeloma, breast carcinoma, carcinoma of lung and prostate, and cause several complications: pain, pathological fractures, hypercalcemia and others, all of which reduce a patient's quality of life. The progression of bone metastasis is associated with a poor prognosis and short survival. The development of metastatic disease is a complex process. It was found that some genes expressed by tumor cell lines were common for metastases to all sites, whereas others were selectively expressed if the cell lines had a predilection to grow in a given tissue. The vicious circle related to bone metastasis develops when factors secreted by or expressed on tumor cells (e.g. parathyroid hormone-related peptide) activate osteoblasts and osteoclasts in the bone microenvironment to produce cytokines; bone remodeling and osteolysis cause release of growth factors, which then stimulate tumor cell growth, motility and further release of e.g. parathyroid hormone-related peptide (1, 2). New molecules are still being shown to have a role in this process and are also potential candidate biomarkers.

Current diagnostics of bone metastatic disease is based on imaging methods, which are not satisfactory for early detection or regular treatment monitoring. Today, there is accessible and effective biological treatment for patients but early detection is required. New biomarkers, in combination with traditional markers of bone turnover, could help to improve the strategy for managing bone-metastatic disease and this is why this is a hotspot for further research. xMAP multiplex technology, enables the simultaneous measurement of large numbers of circulating biomarkers in a small sample volume and could be a useful tool for the evaluation of biomarkers in oncology, as we have shown in previous studies carried out in our laboratory on different oncology topics (3-5). New immunoanalytic technologies could open the door to regular patient monitoring using only blood sampling, with no doses of radiation, contrary to currently used monitoring by imaging methods.

The present study focused on testing the Human Cancer/Metastasis Biomarker Panel 1, which is a commercially available multiplex panel for the measurement of the marker serum levels using xMAP technology. This panel contains nine biomarkers that have been identified for a variety of tumor types: Dickkopf-related protein 1 (DKK1), growth differentiation factor-15 (GDF15), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), osteoprotegerin (OPG), osteonectin, periostin, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP5), tumor necrosis factor related weak inducer of apoptosis (TWEAK), chitinase-3-like protein 1 (YKL40). We tested this panel for the detection of tumor-induced bone disease (bone metastases) and compared it to serum bone markers now routinely used in the monitoring of several bone diseases: carboxy-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (PINP). We evalutated the relationship of the levels of circulating bone markers to the results of whole-body skeletal scintigraphy.

Patients and Methods

Group of patients. The multiplex panel of biomarkers was studied in a cohort of 62 oncological patients with solid tumors undergoing whole-body skeletal scintigraphy using technetium (99mTc). The assessed group included patients with the following diagnosis: prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer and colorectal cancer (CRC). According to the results of scintigraphy, the cohort was divided into groups based on the occurrence of bone metastases. In our study, group 0 was a control group of 23 patients with no signs of bone metastases (age: median=68 years, minimum=48 years, maximum=85years). We enrolled two groups of patients with bone metastases: group 1 represents 28 patients with no therapy (age: median=65 years, minimum=35 years, maximum=83 years); group 2 represents 11 patients who were treated before scintigraphy with denosumab (median age=64 years, minimum=52 years, maximum= 83 years). The Kruskal–Wallis test showed the groups of patients did not differ significantly in age. The study was approved by the local Ethical Committee on 13th July 2011 and all the patients signed an informed consent form before participating in this study.

Plasma samples. Peripheral blood was drawn before scintigraphy using VACUETTE® Z Serum Sep tubes (Greiner Bio-One, Kremsmünster, Austria) and allowed to clot. Sera were separated by centrifugation at 1,700 × g for 10 min and all specimens were immediately aliquoted and frozen. Samples were stored at −80°C. No more than one freeze-thaw cycle was allowed before analysis.

Analytical methods used. Serum levels of DKK1, GDF15, NSE, OPG, osteonectin, periostin, TRAP5, TWEAK and YKL40 were assayed using a Human Cancer Metastasis Biomarker Magnetic Bead Panel (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). CTX levels were measured by the chemiluminescent immunoassay β-CrossLaps Roche (F. Hoffmann–La Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and PINP levels were measured using the radioimmunoassay UniQ PINP RIA (Orion Diagnostica, Espoo, Finland). Analytical ranges of the used assays: DKK1 (0.007-30), YKL40 (0,048-20), TWEAK (0.012-50), TRAP5 (0.019-80), periostin (0.195-800), osteonectin (0.976-4.0), OPG (0.007-30), NSE (0.036-150), GDF15 (0.002-10), CTX (0.01-6.00) all in ng/ml and PINP (5-250 μg/l).

Statistical methods. Descriptive statistics, i.e. the median, the 25th and the 75th percentiles, were calculated for all markers. The Kruskal–Wallis test was used to make a comparison of marker levels between all three groups. Significance was set for p-values lower than 0.05. If the Kruskal–Wallis test was positive (p<0.05) then post hoc analysis was performed: a test for pairwise comparison of subgroups according to Conover (6). Furthermore, for markers where a difference between groups was found, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Because the multiplex is not a routine method, mean coefficients of variation (CV%; percentage relative standard deviation) were calculated for all multiplexed analytes. Results outside of the calibration curve ranges were stated as the value of the lowest or highest calibration point.

Results

A summary of descriptive statistics are shown in Table I. The differences among groups, AUC values and 95th percentiles are shown in Table II. Regarding the biological activity markers included in the multiplex panel, only GDF15, osteonectin, TRAP5, TWEAK and YKL40 differed significantly between groups. Both classic routine bone markers exhibited differences between groups. Osteonectin levels only differed significantly between group 0 and 2. All differing markers had higher levels in group 1 compared to 0, with the exception of TWEAK, which had lower levels in group 1 compared to 0, but without significant differences from group 2. All studied markers can be ordered by their decreasing ability to distinguish the occurrence of bone metastasis according to decreasing AUC (ROC analysis, group 0 versus group 1) as follows: PINP, GDF15, TRAP5, TWEAK, YKL40, osteonectin and CTX.

Mean CVs for doublets in multiplex analysis were below 6.5% for all analytes; the best was for periostin (3.31%) and the worst for TWEAK (6.11%).

Discussion

Multiplex analytic technology xMAP, used in our study, is an open-architecture system based on color-coded magnetic microspheres coated by antibodies to perform quantitative sandwich immunoanalysis of proteins. Reactions are then read in a Magpix analyzer, a compact fluorescence-based LED detection system, capable of simultaneously measuring up to 50 targets of interest in a single microtiter well. Multiplexing of assays enables similar and standard analytic conditions for all proteins measured in one well. This feature of multiplexing is most valid for comparison of novel biomarkers without bias. Multiplexing reduces radically sample volume, labor -time and costs over traditional methods such as ELISA or RIA.

In our study, the most promising new biomarker from the multiplex panel was shown to be GFD15. It is the only known secreted p53-regulated cytokine and therefore can serve as a biomarker for p53 activation both in vitro and in vivo. GDF15 may play antitumoral role during the early stages of cancer but conversely, it can promote invasiveness and metastatic behavior at advanced stages, and it is involved in the epithelial–mesenchymal transition in tumors (7). Roles for GDF15 have recently been identified in modulating osteoclast differentiation and for therapy for bone metastases from prostate cancer (8). In our study we found higher levels in patients with bone metastases compared to the controls. We found no significant change in GDF15 levels in group 2, patients who had undergone biological treatment for metastases. In the literature, high plasma levels of GDF15 before a diagnosis of CRC are associated with greater CRC-specific mortality (9). GDF15 could be considered a novel prognostic marker for CRC for clinical practice. Serum GDF15 levels are significantly elevated in most cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), including those negative for cancer antigen 19-9 and with early-stage disease, and thus may serve as a novel diagnostic marker for early diagnosis and postoperative monitoring of PDAC (10). Westhrin et al. described the role of GDF15 in osteoclast differentiation and showed an association of high serum GDF15 level with bone disease in multiple myeloma. In their study, the same analytical technology was used (11).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Summary of statistics.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Differences between groups and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

A further promising marker for bone metastasis in the multiplex panel is TRAP5. It is one of the most abundant enzymes in osteoclasts and plays a role in bone resorption. Elevated TRAP levels in serum can be caused by Paget's disease, hemodialysis, primary hyperparathyroidism, metastatic malignancies involving bone resorption, multiple myeloma and bilateral ovariectomy (12). In our study, we found elevated levels in patients with bone metastases without treatment (group 1) compared to the control group. Sarvari et al. found that serum TRAP5 was not markedly elevated in those with limited bone metastases but was strongly elevated in those with extensive bone metastases (13). Our results are in accordance with those of Tang et al., who found higher TRAP5 values in patients with bone metastases compared to patients with no bone metastases (14). In our study, TRAP5 was the only multiplex marker showing a significant difference in patients undergoing biological treatment (denosumab; group 2) compared to untreated patients (group 1). We observed a decrease in patients after denosumab treatment.

Chitinase-3-like protein 1 commonly known as YKL40 molecule or CHI3L1, is a member of the mammal chitinase family and it is a matrix protein of specific granules in human neutrophils. Furthermore YKL40 is secreted by chondrocytes, synovial cells, and macrophages. YKL40 is suspected to have a role in remodeling or degradation of the extracellular matrix (15). In our study, we found higher serum levels of YKL40 in the bone-metastatic groups compared to the controls. This is in accordance with the literature findings where high pre-treatment serum levels of YKL40 are described as being associated with a poor outcome of metastatic prostate cancer and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and a marker for early death in prostate cancer and so could serve as a new prognostic biomarker in patients (16-18).

TWEAK mediates different biological effects such as proliferation, angiogenesis, and osteoclastogenesis. These effects help tumor cells to survive and spread. Williams et al. highlight that TWEAK plays a role in the progression of multiple myeloma and may facilitate bone destruction (19). In our study, we recorded higher levels in patients with solid tumor and bone-metastatic disease compared to patients without metastases in bones. This could show a role of TWEAK in solid tumor spread into bones. TWEAK may be a potential molecule for further studies as a biomarker for stratification of patients.

Osteonectin, which is also known as secreted protein, acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC) and basement-membrane protein 40 (BM40), has a major role in bone mineralization and collagen binding. Osteonectin affects cell–matrix interactions by accelerating the production and increasing the activity of matrix metalloproteinases, which helps cancer cells to enter the bone, along with promoting angiogenesis, proliferation and migration. Overexpression of osteonectin is reported in many human cancer types such as of the breast, prostate and colon (20). We only found higher levels of osteonectin in the group of treated patients with bone metastases. While we tested the novel analytical multiplex panel, we admit to a higher level of analytical imprecision for osteonectin in serum. This imprecision is caused by calibration curve ranges. Many sample results for osteonectin were at the very low end of the sigmoidal calibration curve i.e. in a flat area of calibration, which causes poor resolution of such samples.

OPG is known for its role in bone metabolism and is also related to the activity of bone metastasis (21). Contrary to our study, serum OPG levels are described in the literature as being increased in patients with bone-metastatic disease in prostate cancer compared with patients with organ-confined disease. Serum OPG increases may indicate disease progression or relapse in prostate cancer (22, 23).

Another molecule measured in our study was the small secretary protein DKK1. It is known to be involved in proliferation, differentiation, survival, apoptosis, and cell motility. Serum levels of DKK1 increase in patients with different cancer types and higher expression has been reported to be associated with, worse prognosis, spread of metastases, and poorer survival. Liang et al. reported that serum DKK1 is even a potential biomarker for screening of gastrointestinal cancer (24). In one of the latest studies performed by Rachner et al., multivariate analyses defined a high serum level of DKK1 as an independent prognostic marker of poor survival in prostate cancer (25). We found no relationships between DKK1 level and bone-metastatic disease in our study.

NSE is a routinely used tumor marker of small cell lung cancer. It is a universal marker of the neuroendocrine nature of cells within a tumor. It has been described that high levels of NSE signal a worse prognosis e.g. for NSCLC or prostate cancer, but we do not suppose there to be a close connection to the spread of bone tumor. We did not find any significant differences in the level of NSE between groups.

Another molecule for which no changes in correlation to bone metastases were found in our study is periostin. Periostin serves as a cell-adhesion molecule, that might promote invasion in a tumor microenvironment. High expression of periostin is reported in most solid tumors, including breast, colon, head and neck, pancreatic, lung, papillary thyroid, ovarian, gastric and liver carcinoma, as well as neuroblastoma (26). Our observations were contradictory to results presented by Sasaki et al., who described serum periostin levels to be elevated in patients with bone metastases from breast cancer compared to patients without evidence of bone metastasis (27).

PINP and CTX as routine markers of turnover of collagen I in bone remodelation are widely discussed as markers of bone metastasis. One study, performed by Lumachi et al., showed that CTX and PINP levels are useful in monitoring of patients with NSCLC to aid early detection of bone metastases (28). However, these markers are still not in routine use in oncology for bone metastasis detection.

Treatment, monitoring and tailoring are the most desired future functions of markers in bone-metastatic disease management. For example Lester et al. evaluated a bone marker-directed schedule of treatment with zolendronic acid based on levels of the bone resorption marker urinary N-telopeptide of type I collagen. Their experience suggests that a tailored approach to bisphosphonate therapy may be a more cost-effective approach than the currently licensed and recommended fixed schedule of intravenous treatment (29). Treatment monitoring would enable improvement of cost-effectiveness, the reduction of doses through individual tailoring, and hopefully a decrease in the severity of adverse therapy effects. The necessity for proper choice of individualized patient treatment by novel targeted antibody drugs is currently a hot topic. However, one problem is that bone markers are mainly studied separately, e.g. amino-terminal collagen crosslinks (NTX) levels in the BISMARK study (30) and so their comparison is very complicated.

In conclusion, using the novel multiplex panel, we identified five new biomarkers: GDF15, TRAP5, TWEAK, and YKL40 which are promising markers for bone metastasis monitoring. The best marker of bone metastases in our study was PINP, but surprisingly the five novel markers performed better than CTX. We are continuing with a study of novel markers in larger cohorts with the aim of providing multiparametric evaluation in conjunction with multiplex analysis of biomarkers for bone-metastatic disease.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the research project of Ministry of Health of The Czech Republic IGA NT 13655-4.

  • Received January 25, 2016.
  • Revision received March 8, 2016.
  • Accepted March 18, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Eccles SA,
    2. Welch DR
    : Metastasis: recent discoveries and novel treatment strategies. Lancet 369: 1742-1757, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Virk MS,
    2. Lieberman JR
    : Tumor metastasis to bone. Arthritis Res Ther 9(Suppl 1): S5, 2007.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Kucera R,
    2. Topolcan O,
    3. Treskova I,
    4. Kinkorova J,
    5. Windrichova J,
    6. Fuchsova R,
    7. Svobodova S,
    8. Treska V,
    9. Babuska V,
    10. Novak J,
    11. Smejkal J
    : Evaluation of IL2, IL6, IL8 and IL10 in malignant melanoma diagnostics. Anticancer Res 35: 3537-3541, 2015.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kalfert D,
    2. Ludvikova M,
    3. Topolcan O,
    4. Windrichova J,
    5. Malirova E,
    6. Pesta M,
    7. Celakovsky P
    : Analysis of preoperative serum levels of MMP1, -2, and -9 in patients with site-specific head and neck squamous cell cancer. Anticancer Res 34: 7431-7441, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Vrzalova J,
    2. Prazakova M,
    3. Novotny Z,
    4. Topolcan O,
    5. Casova M,
    6. Holubec L Jr..
    : Test of ovarian cancer multiplex xMAP technology panel. Anticancer Res 29: 573-576, 2009.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Conover WJ
    : Practical nonparametric statistics Third Edition, New York: John Wiley and sons, 1999.
  6. ↵
    1. Li C,
    2. Wang J,
    3. Kong J,
    4. Tang J,
    5. Wu Y,
    6. Xu E,
    7. Zhang H,
    8. Lai M
    : GDF15 promotes EMT and metastasis in colorectal cancer. Oncotarget 7(1): 860-872, 2016.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Vanhara P,
    2. Hampl A,
    3. Kozubik A,
    4. Soucek K
    : Growth/differentiation factor-15: Prostate-cancer suppressor or promoter? Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 15: 320-328, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Mehta RS,
    2. Chong DQ,
    3. Song M,
    4. Meyerhardt JA,
    5. Ng K,
    6. Nishihara R,
    7. Qian Z,
    8. Morikawa T,
    9. Wu K,
    10. Giovannucci EL,
    11. Fuchs CS,
    12. Ogino S,
    13. Chan AT
    : Association between plasma levels of macrophage inhibitory cytokine-1 before diagnosis of colorectal cancer and mortality. Gastroenterology 149: 614-622, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Wang X,
    2. Li Y,
    3. Tian H,
    4. Qi J,
    5. Li M,
    6. Fu C,
    7. Wu F,
    8. Wang Y,
    9. Cheng D,
    10. Zhao W,
    11. Zhang C,
    12. Wang T,
    13. Rao J,
    14. Zhang W
    : Macrophage inhibitory cytokine 1 (MIC-1/GDF15) as a novel diagnostic serum biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 14: 578-2407-14-578, 2014.
  10. ↵
    1. Westhrin M,
    2. Moen SH,
    3. Holien T,
    4. Mylin AK,
    5. Heickendorff L,
    6. Olsen OE,
    7. Sundan A,
    8. Turesson I,
    9. Gimsing P,
    10. Waage A,
    11. Standal T
    : Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15) promotes osteoclast differentiation and inhibits osteoblast differentiation and high serum GDF15 levels are associated with multiple myeloma bone disease. Haematologica 100: e511-514, 2015.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Halleen JM,
    2. Tiitinen SL,
    3. Ylipahkala H,
    4. Fagerlund KM,
    5. Vaananen HK
    : Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5b) as a marker of bone resorption. Clin Lab 52: 499-509, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Sarvari BK,
    2. Sankara Mahadev D,
    3. Rupa S,
    4. Mastan SA
    : Detection of bone metastases in breast cancer (BC) patients by serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRACP 5b), a bone resorption marker and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP), a bone formation marker, in lieu of whole-body skeletal scintigraphy with technetium99m MDP. Indian J Clin Biochem 30: 66-71, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Tang C,
    2. Liu Y,
    3. Qin H,
    4. Li X,
    5. Guo W,
    6. Li J,
    7. Wang W,
    8. Qu L,
    9. Hu H,
    10. Xu C,
    11. Zheng L,
    12. Huang Y,
    13. Liu B,
    14. Gao H,
    15. Halleen JM,
    16. Liu X
    : Clinical significance of serum BAP, TRACP 5b and ICTP as bone metabolic markers for bone metastasis screening in lung cancer patients. Clin Chim Acta 426: 102-107, 2013.
    OpenUrl
  14. ↵
    1. Volck B,
    2. Price PA,
    3. Johansen JS,
    4. Sorensen O,
    5. Benfield TL,
    6. Nielsen HJ,
    7. Calafat J,
    8. Borregaard N
    : YKL40, a mammalian member of the chitinase family, is a matrix protein of specific granules in human neutrophils. Proc Assoc Am Physicians 110: 351-360, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Thom I,
    2. Andritzky B,
    3. Schuch G,
    4. Burkholder I,
    5. Edler L,
    6. Johansen JS,
    7. Bokemeyer C,
    8. Schumacher U,
    9. Laack E
    : Elevated pretreatment serum concentration of YKL40 – An independent prognostic biomarker for poor survival in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer. Cancer 116: 4114-4121, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Brasso K,
    2. Christensen IJ,
    3. Johansen JS,
    4. Teisner B,
    5. Garnero P,
    6. Price PA,
    7. Iversen P
    : Prognostic value of PINP, bone alkaline phosphatase, CTX-I, and YKL40 in patients with metastatic prostate carcinoma. Prostate 66: 503-513, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Johansen JS,
    2. Brasso K,
    3. Iversen P,
    4. Teisner B,
    5. Garnero P,
    6. Price PA,
    7. Christensen IJ
    : Changes of biochemical markers of bone turnover and YKL40 following hormonal treatment for metastatic prostate cancer are related to survival. Clin Cancer Res 13: 3244-3249, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Williams SA,
    2. Martin SK,
    3. Vincent C,
    4. Gronthos S,
    5. Zheng T,
    6. Atkins GJ,
    7. Zannettino AC
    : Circulating levels of TWEAK correlate with bone erosion in multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 150: 373-376, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Ribeiro N,
    2. Sousa SR,
    3. Brekken RA,
    4. Monteiro FJ
    : Role of SPARC in bone remodeling and cancer-related bone metastasis. J Cell Biochem 115: 17-26, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Holen I,
    2. Shipman CM
    : Role of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in cancer. Clin Sci (Lond) 110: 279-291, 2006.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Jung K,
    2. Lein M,
    3. von Hosslin K,
    4. Brux B,
    5. Schnorr D,
    6. Loening SA,
    7. Sinha P
    : Osteoprotegerin in serum as a novel marker of bone metastatic spread in prostate cancer. Clin Chem 47: 2061-2063, 2001.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Jung K,
    2. Lein M,
    3. Stephan C,
    4. Von Hosslin K,
    5. Semjonow A,
    6. Sinha P,
    7. Loening SA,
    8. Schnorr D
    : Comparison of 10 serum bone turnover markers in prostate carcinoma patients with bone metastatic spread: diagnostic and prognostic implications. Int J Cancer 111: 783-791, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Liang B,
    2. Zhong L,
    3. He Q,
    4. Wang S,
    5. Pan Z,
    6. Wang T,
    7. Zhao Y
    : Serum dickkopf-1 as a biomarker in screening gastrointestinal cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Onco Targets Ther 8: 3115-3122, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Rachner TD,
    2. Thiele S,
    3. Gobel A,
    4. Browne A,
    5. Fuessel S,
    6. Erdmann K,
    7. Wirth MP,
    8. Frohner M,
    9. Todenhofer T,
    10. Muders MH,
    11. Kieslinger M,
    12. Rauner M,
    13. Hofbauer LC
    : High serum levels of dickkopf-1 are associated with a poor prognosis in prostate cancer patients. BMC Cancer 14: 649-2407-14-649, 2014.
  24. ↵
    1. Liu AY,
    2. Zheng H,
    3. Ouyang G
    : Periostin, a multifunctional matricellular protein in inflammatory and tumor microenvironments. Matrix Biol 37: 150-156, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Sasaki H,
    2. Yu CY,
    3. Dai M,
    4. Tam C,
    5. Loda M,
    6. Auclair D,
    7. Chen LB,
    8. Elias A
    : Elevated serum periostin levels in patients with bone metastases from breast but not lung cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 77: 245-252, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Lumachi F,
    2. Santeufemia DA,
    3. Del Conte A,
    4. Mazza F,
    5. Tozzoli R,
    6. Chiara GB,
    7. Basso SM
    : Carboxy-terminal telopeptide (CTX) and amino-terminal propeptide (PINP) of type I collagen as markers of bone metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Anticancer Res 33: 2593-2596, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Lester J,
    2. Horsman J,
    3. Purohit OP,
    4. Brown JE,
    5. Coleman RE
    : Bone resorption marker directed therapy for metastatic bone disease. Bone 38(3 Suppl 1): 79, 2006.
    OpenUrl
  28. ↵
    1. Coleman R,
    2. Brown J,
    3. Terpos E,
    4. Lipton A,
    5. Smith MR,
    6. Cook R,
    7. Major P
    : Bone markers and their prognostic value in metastatic bone disease: clinical evidence and future directions. Cancer Treat Rev 34: 629-639, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (4)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 4
April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Testing of a Novel Cancer Metastatic Multiplex Panel for the Detection of Bone-metastatic Disease – a Pilot Study
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
9 + 5 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Testing of a Novel Cancer Metastatic Multiplex Panel for the Detection of Bone-metastatic Disease – a Pilot Study
JINDRA WINDRICHOVA, RADKA FUCHSOVA, RADEK KUCERA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, ONDREJ FIALA, JINDRICH FINEK, DAGMAR SLIPKOVA, MARIE KARLIKOVA, JANA SVOBODOVA
Anticancer Research Apr 2016, 36 (4) 1973-1978;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Testing of a Novel Cancer Metastatic Multiplex Panel for the Detection of Bone-metastatic Disease – a Pilot Study
JINDRA WINDRICHOVA, RADKA FUCHSOVA, RADEK KUCERA, ONDREJ TOPOLCAN, ONDREJ FIALA, JINDRICH FINEK, DAGMAR SLIPKOVA, MARIE KARLIKOVA, JANA SVOBODOVA
Anticancer Research Apr 2016, 36 (4) 1973-1978;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • MIC1/GDF15 as a Bone Metastatic Disease Biomarker
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Retrospective Study of Radiotherapy Impact on the Outcome of Material-assisted Implant-based Subpectoral Breast Reconstruction
  • Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Oligometastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Liver or Lung
  • Treatment Volume, Dose Prescription and Delivery Techniques for Dose-intensification in Rectal Cancer: A National Survey
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • cancer
  • bone metastasis
  • scintigraphy
  • biomarkers
  • multiplex technology
Anticancer Research

© 2021 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire