Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Cytogenetic Biomonitoring in Buccal Mucosa Cells from Women Submitted to Chemotherapy After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer

ANA CAROLINA FLYGARE SOUZA, VICTOR HUGO PEREIRA DA SILVA, CAMILA SEIXAS, TANIA TEREZINHA DE OLIVEIRA SCUDELLER, MARIA TERESA PACE DO AMARAL and DANIEL ARAKI RIBEIRO
Anticancer Research April 2016, 36 (4) 1955-1958;
ANA CAROLINA FLYGARE SOUZA
1Department of Biosciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
VICTOR HUGO PEREIRA DA SILVA
1Department of Biosciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
CAMILA SEIXAS
1Department of Biosciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
TANIA TEREZINHA DE OLIVEIRA SCUDELLER
2Department of Management and Health Care, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MARIA TERESA PACE DO AMARAL
2Department of Management and Health Care, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
DANIEL ARAKI RIBEIRO
1Department of Biosciences, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: daribeiro{at}unifesp.br daribeiro{at}pesquisador.cnpq.br
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In addition to surgery, one of the most widely applied treatments for breast cancer is chemotherapy. Chemotherapy is currently considered efficient in curing this disease; however, the therapy may induce damage to the patient's genetic material. Thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate putative cytotoxic and mutagenic effects induced by chemotherapy in women diagnosed with breast cancer. For this purpose, a cross-sectional study was carried out in 42 women, aged 18 to 70 years, allocated according to the diagnosis and stage of breast cancer treatment: control group (healthy) (n=15), chemotherapy group (n=11) and post-chemotherapy group (n=16). Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity were analyzed by the micronucleus test in buccal mucosa cells. A higher frequency (p<0.05) of micronucleated cells was detected in the chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy groups when compared to the control. A higher frequency (p<0.05) of karyorrhexis and pyknosis in the chemotherapy group was also noted. Taken together, our results indicate that chemotherapy induces mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in buccal mucosa cells of women diagnosed with breast cancer, being persistent after finishing their treatment.

  • Oral mucosa cells
  • breast cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • micronucleus test

Breast cancer is the leading cause of death among women worldwide, both in developed or in developing countries. In Brazil, it has been estimated that there will be 52,000 new cases in 2016 (1). Recent epidemiological studies indicate that lifestyle as well as environmental factors play a crucial role in the etiology of the disease (2). Risk factors for breast cancer include early age of menarche, late menopause, contraceptive use, hormonal replacement therapy, obesity, environmental pollutants, smoking and alcohol use (3). It is accepted that the initiation of breast cancer is characterized by alterations of expression of cell cycle-regulatory proteins caused by mutagenic agents and carcinogens.

The micronucleus test is well recognized as a reliable biomarker of chromosomal damage, being widely applied in genetic toxicology for human biomonitoring studies (4). Nowadays, the micronucleus test is one of the gold-standard assays able to evaluate with accuracy either in vitro or in vivo for regulatory purposes and for risk assessment of chemicals (5, 6). The test is very successful in monitoring human populations exposed to putative genotoxic compounds (7). Recent prospective studies have demonstrated higher frequencies of micronuclei in eukaryotic cells in association with increased risk of cancer. This provides scientific evidence that this biomarker could be predictive of cancer risk after therapy for cancer such as radio- or chemotherapy (8, 9). Micronuclei are defined as acentric fragments or whole chromosomes that are not included in the main nuclei of the daughter cells. Micronuclei are induced by substances that cause chromosomal breakage (clastogens), or disruption of the spindle apparatus (aneugens) (10). According to Tolbert et al., the specificity of the test to detect chromosomal damage is improved by analyzing other degenerative nuclear alterations indicative of cell death (11). Among them, pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis are suitable for this purpose.

Nowadays, the treatment of breast cancer includes surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Anti-neoplastic drugs are used in the treatment of cancer worldwide. Nevertheless, mutagenicity of such anti-neoplastic drugs has been detected in short-term assays reflected in several biological endpoints. In fact, anti-neoplastic drugs have demonstrated genotoxicity using in vitro test systems (12, 13). In vivo, mutagenic outcomes have been found in patients with cancer treated with anti-neoplastic drugs (14, 15).

Many published data have shown the application of the micronucleus assay in untreated women with breast cancer (16, 17). These demonstrated an increase of micronucleus frequency in patients compared with control groups, with a large variability among the tumors and studies (18-21). However, studies investigating the outcomes induced by chemotherapy in patients after mastectomy for breast cancer are fairly limited in the literature.

As a result and because of the lack of scientific evidence, the aim of this study was to investigate mutagenicity and cytotoxicity in buccal mucosa cells induced by chemotherapy in patients after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Participants. The subjects of this study consisted of 42 women provided from Neo Mama Institute (Santos City, SP, Brazil), aged 18 to 70 years, allocated according to the diagnosis and stage of breast cancer treatment: control group (healthy) (n=15), chemotherapy group (n=11) and post-chemotherapy group (n=16). All volunteers included in chemotherapy were submitted to mastectomy and the post-chemotherapy group had finished the therapy up to 2 years earlier. None of the participants were smokers. The study was approved by the Human Ethics Committee of the Federal University of Sao Paulo (no. 887029). Informed consent was obtained from all participants. All patients with breast cancer were diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma II or III (22).

Micronucleus test in oral mucosa cells. After rinsing their mouth with tap water, cells were obtained by scraping the right/left cheek mucosa of each participant with a moist wooden spatula. The cells were transferred to a tube containing saline solution, centrifuged at 180 × g for 5 min, fixed in 3:1 methanol/acetic acid, and placed on pre-cleaned slides. Later, the air-dried slides were stained using the Feulgen/Fast-Green method, and examined under a light microscope at ×1000 magnification to determine the frequency of micronucleated cells. Two thousand cells were scored from each participant.

Data analysis. Micronuclei were scored according to the criteria described by Belien et al. (10) as a parameter of DNA damage (mutagenicity). For cytotoxicity, the following nuclear alterations were considered: pyknosis, karyolysis and karyorrhexis. Results were expressed as a percentage of total cells examined. The analysis was evaluated independently by two biomedical doctors in a blinded fashion.

Statistical methods. The Mann–Whitney non-parametric test was used to compare the frequencies of cytotoxicity among the samples between experimental and control groups. Micronuclei were evaluated as established by Pereira et al. (23). The statistical analysis was conducted using BioStat software, version 5.0 (Maringa, PR, Brazil). The level of statistical significance was set at 5%.

Results

Table I shows the frequencies of micronucleated cells in buccal mucosa cells of women submitted to chemotherapy for breast cancer. A higher frequency (p<0.05) of micronuclei was obtained for the chemotherapy group compared with the matched controls. Furthermore, significantly statistical differences (p<0.05) were detected between post-chemotherapy and control groups.

When cytotoxicity parameters were evaluated, interesting findings were made. Chemotherapy induced cytotoxicity in buccal mucosa cells from women diagnosed with breast cancer since significant statistically differences (p<0.05) were found for karyorrhexis, pyknosis. Karyolysis was not remarkable different between groups (p>0.05). After chemotherapy, no significant statistically differences (p>0.05) were found between groups. Such findings are shown in Table II.

Finally, exposure to known genotoxins was not investigated since all participants were non-smokers. Daily alcohol consumption was not considered in this study because recall bias phenomenon had occurred.

Discussion

The aim of this study was to evaluate chromosome damage and cellular death induced by chemotherapy comparatively in women with breast cancer submitted to chemotherapy as indicators of mutagenicity and cytotoxicity, respectively. The investigation was conducted using the micronucleus test in oral exfoliated cells. To the best of our knowledge, this approach has not been taken before.

The micronucleus assay is widely recognized by scientific literature as an easy, cheap and reliable technique for cytogenetic biomonitoring (10). Micronuclei contain genetic material that is lost from whole DNA during mitosis, as a result of clastogenic or aneugenic events (10). Biological events that lead to the formation of micronuclei take place in the basal layer of the epithelial tissue, where cells undergo mitosis. Programmed turnover of epithelial tissues brings these cells to the surface where they exfoliate and, therefore, it is possible to detect them (10).

Genomic damage plays a pivotal role during carcinogenesis. It has been well established that genomic damage is produced by environmental exposure to mutagens and carcinogens, as well as to genetic factors such as defects in xenobiotic metabolism and DNA-repair deficiency (24). Micronuclei frequencies predict genomic instability (25). The detection of an elevated frequency of micronuclei in a given population indicates an increased risk of cancer (26). However, cell types that repair DNA damage efficiently are likely to have lower levels of residual damage than cells less proficient in DNA repair (27). Buccal cells have been shown to have limited DNA-repair capacity relative to peripheral blood lymphocytes, and therefore may more accurately reflect genomic instability events in epithelial tissues (10).

Nowadays, chemotherapy plays a key role in the treatment of many tumor types, improving the prognosis of patients with cancer (3). However, it is well known that some cytostatic drugs can induce DNA damage in both somatic and germ cells, either increasing the incidence of a second malignancy (2) or the incidence of primary tumor in the offspring, when administered in the reproductive stage (28). The age of an individual, their genetic predisposition, as well as the nature of the treatment, have been assumed to be causative factors for development of a second tumor (29). Therefore, the elucidation of the mutagenicity and cytotoxicity induced by chemotherapy is relevant in order to determine the degree of cancer risk, as well as to mitigate further neoplasms induced by therapy. It is important to stress that the goal of this study was mainly to evaluate chromosomal damage induced by chemotherapy rather than measuring genomic instability in patients with cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Frequency of micronucleated cells in buccal mucosa cells of women submitted to chemotherapy for breast cancer.

Our results demonstrated an increase of micronuclei in buccal cells from women undergoing chemotherapy. The same occurred after chemotherapy, i.e. the frequency of micronucleated cells was increased when compared to controls. By comparison, some authors have demonstrated genotoxicity in patients with breast cancer who were submitted to radiotherapy, specific patterns of DNA damage being observed in the majority of patients after prolonged exposure to ionizing radiation as a result of adaptive response (30). Radio- and chemotherapy significantly increased the frequency of micronuclei in patients' lymphocytes, but without significant differences in the frequency of therapy-induced micronuclei between groups (31). Others demonstrated no difference in the DNA-repair capacity of lymphocytes from patients with breast cancer and healthy women after etoposide-induced DNA damage (32). Taken as a whole, our data emphasize the well-known influence of chemotherapy on oral mucosal cells. In particular; we assumed that cytogenetic damage in buccal mucosal cells persists after finishing chemotherapy.

To monitor cytotoxic effects, the frequencies of karyorrhexis, karyolysis and pyknosis were included in our experimental design. Our results showed that chemotherapy increased the frequencies of pyknosis and karyorrhexis. Post-chemotherapy, cytotoxicity had not been induced as depicted by the lack of statistically significant differences (p>0.05) between groups. Some authors have argued that chemotherapy is able to induce cellular death in vitro and in vivo (33). However, the cytotoxic insult does not accumulate after finishing the therapy. This issue requires further investigation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Cytotoxicity parameters (karrhyorexis, pyknosis and karyolysis) in buccal mucosa cells of women submitted to chemotherapy for breast cancer.

In conclusion, the results of the present study suggest that chemotherapy induces cytogenetic damage in women diagnosed with breast cancer. Cytogenetic damage found herein reflects a certain degree of genomic instability, reinforcing the need for evaluating the side-effects induced by chemotherapy on health, as well as contributing to the micronucleus database for understanding and improving this methodology. Overall, these patients should be examined regularly in order to detect and prevent second tumors developing.

Footnotes

  • Conflicts of Interest

    None declared.

  • Received January 22, 2016.
  • Revision received March 4, 2016.
  • Accepted March 15, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Brasil
    . Instituto Nacional do Cancer, 2016. Available from http://www.inca.gov.br/estimativa/2016/sintese-de-resultados-comentarios.asp. Last accessed January, 22, 2016.
  2. ↵
    1. Kristensen NS,
    2. Haraldsen EK,
    3. Anderson KB,
    4. Lonning PE,
    5. Erikstein B,
    6. Karesen R,
    7. Gabrielsen OS,
    8. Borresen-Dale AL
    : CYP17 and breast cancer risk: the polymorphism in the 5‘ flanking area of the gene does not influence binding to Sp-1. Cancer Res 59: 2825-2828, 1999.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Hulka BS,
    2. Moorman PG
    : Breast cancer: hormones and other risk factors. Maturitas 38: 103-116, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Fenech M
    : Cytokinesis-block micronucleus cytome assay. Nat Protoc 2: 1084-1104, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    OECD TG 474: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 474: Mammalian Erythrocyte Micronucleus Test. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France, 1997.
  6. ↵
    OECD TG 487: OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, No. 487: In Vitro Mammalian Cell Micronucleus Test (MNvit). Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development: Paris, France, 2009.
  7. ↵
    1. Battershill JM,
    2. Burnett K,
    3. Bull S
    : Factors affecting the incidence of genotoxicity biomarkers in peripheral blood lymphocytes: impact on design of biomonitoring studies. Mutagenesis 23: 423-437, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bonassi S,
    2. El-Zein R,
    3. Bolognesi C,
    4. Fenech M
    : Micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes and cancer risk: evidence from human studies. Mutagenesis 26: 93-100, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Murgia E,
    2. Ballardin M,
    3. Bonassi S,
    4. Rossi AM,
    5. Barale R
    : Validation of micronuclei frequency in peripheral blood lymphocytes as early cancer risk biomarker in a nested case–control study. Mutat 639: 27-34, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  10. ↵
    1. Beliën JA,
    2. Copper MP,
    3. Braakhuis BJ,
    4. Snow GB,
    5. Baak JP
    : Standardization of counting micronuclei: definition of a protocol to measure genotoxic damage in human exfoliated cells. Carcinogenesis 16: 2395-2400, 1995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Tolbert PE,
    2. Shy CM,
    3. Allen JW
    : Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in buccal smears: methods development. Mutat Res 271: 69-77, 1992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Maluf SW,
    2. Erdtmann B
    : Follow-up study of the genetic damage in lymphocytes of pharmacists and nurses handling anti-neoplastic drugs evaluated by cytokinesis block micronuclei analysis and single-cell gel electrophoresis assay. Mutat Res 471: 21-27, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Papworth R,
    2. Slevin N,
    3. Robert SA,
    4. Scott D
    : Sensitivity to radiation-induced chromosome damage may be a marker of genetic predisposition in young head a neck cancer patients. Br J Cancer 84: 776-782, 2001.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kaiser HE,
    2. Nasir A,
    3. Groger AM,
    4. Link CJ Jr..
    : The etiology of second primary neoplasms. In Vivo 12: 89-93, 1998.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Minicucci EM,
    2. Ribeiro DA,
    3. de Camargo B,
    4. Costa MC,
    5. Ribeiro LR,
    6. Favero Salvadori DM
    : DNA damage in lymphocytes and buccal mucosa cells of children with malignant tumours undergoing chemotherapy. Clin Exp Med 8: 79-85, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Flores-Garcia A,
    2. Torres-Bugarin O,
    3. Salvador Velarde-Félix J,
    4. Rangel-Villalobos H,
    5. Zepeda-Carrillo EA,
    6. Rodríguez-Trejo A,
    7. Aguíar-García P,
    8. Nersesyan A
    : Micronuclei and other nuclear anomalies in exfoliated buccal mucosa cells of Mexican women withbreast cancer. J BUON 19: 895-899, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Bolognesi C,
    2. Bruzzi P,
    3. Gismondi V,
    4. Volpi S,
    5. Viassolo V,
    6. Pedemonte S,
    7. Varesco L
    : Clinical application of micronucleus test: a case–control study on the prediction of breast cancerrisk/susceptibility. PLoS One 9: e112354, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Galardi F1,
    2. Oakman C,
    3. Truglia MC,
    4. Cappadona S,
    5. Biggeri A,
    6. Grisotto L,
    7. Giovannelli L,
    8. Bessi S,
    9. Giannini A,
    10. Biganzoli L,
    11. Santarpia L,
    12. Di Leo A
    : Inter- and intra-tumoral heterogeneity in DNA damage evaluated by comet assay in early breast cancer patients. Breast 21: 336-342, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kabalar ME1,
    2. Karaman A,
    3. Aylu B,
    4. Ozmen SA,
    5. Erdem I
    : Genetic alterations in benign, preneoplastic and malignant breast lesions. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 55: 319-325, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Cardinale F,
    2. Bruzzi P,
    3. Bolognesi C
    : Role of micronucleus test in predicting breast cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 106: 780-790, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Martins RA,
    2. Gomes GA,
    3. Aguiar O Jr.,
    4. Ribeiro DA
    : Biomonitoring of oral epithelial cells in petrol station attendants: comparison between buccal mucosa and lateral border of the tongue. Environ Int 35: 1062-1065, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Yamaguchi R,
    2. Furusawa H,
    3. Nakahara H,
    4. Inomata M,
    5. Namba K,
    6. Tanaka M,
    7. Ohkuma K,
    8. Tayama K,
    9. Fujii T,
    10. Yano H,
    11. Kage M,
    12. Kojiro M
    : Clinicopathological study of invasive ductal carcinoma with large central acellular zone: special reference to magnetic resonance imaging findings. Pathol Int 58: 26-30, 2008.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Rabelo-Gay N,
    2. Rodrigues M.A,
    3. Monteleone-Neto R
    1. Pereira CAB
    : Teste estatístico para comparar proporções em problemas de citogenética. In: Rabelo-Gay N, Rodrigues M.A, Monteleone-Neto R. (eds.). Mutagênese, Teratogênese e Carcinogênese. SBG, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil, pp. 113-21, 1991 (in Portuguese).
  22. ↵
    1. Neri M,
    2. Fucic A,
    3. Knudsen LE,
    4. Lando C,
    5. Merlo F,
    6. Bonassi S
    : Micronuclei frequency in children exposed to environmental mutagens: a review. Mutat Res 544: 243-225, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Thomas P,
    2. Harvey S,
    3. Gruner T,
    4. Fenech M
    : The buccal cytome and micronucleus frequency is substantially altered in Down's syndrome and normal ageing compared to young healthy controls. Mutat Res 638: 3-47, 2008.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    1. Stich HF,
    2. Rosin MP
    : Quantitating the synergistic effect of smoking and alcohol consumption with the micronucleus test on human buccal mucosa cells. Int J Cancer 31: 305-308, 1983.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Kujan O,
    2. Oliver RJ,
    3. Khattab A,
    4. Roberts SA,
    5. Thakker N,
    6. Sloan A
    : Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.Oral Oncol 42: 987-993, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kang HJ,
    2. Kim SW,
    3. Kim HJ,
    4. Ahn SJ,
    5. Bae JY,
    6. Park SK,
    7. Kang D,
    8. Hirvonen A,
    9. Choe KJ,
    10. Noh DY
    : Polymorphisms in the estrogen receptor-alpha gene and breast cancer risk. Cancer Lett 178: 175-118, 2002.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hagmar L,
    2. Bonassi S,
    3. Strömberg U,
    4. Brøgger A,
    5. Knudsen L,
    6. Norppa H,
    7. Reuterwall C
    : Chromosomal aberrations in lymphocytes predict human cancer – a report from the European Study Group on Cytogenetic Biomarkers and Health (ESCH). Cancer Res 58: 4117-4121, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Gamulin M,
    2. Garaj-Vrhovac V,
    3. Kopjar N,
    4. Ramić S,
    5. Viculin T,
    6. Juretić A,
    7. Grgić M
    : DNA and cytogenetic damage in white blood cells of postmenopausal breast cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng 45: 292-304, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Milosevic-Djordjevic O,
    2. Stosic I,
    3. Vuckovic M,
    4. Grujicic D,
    5. Marinkovic D
    : Baseline and therapy-induced chromosome damages in peripheral blood lymphocytes of breast cancer patients assessed by the micronucleus assay. J BUON 16: 437-443, 2011.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Teixeira AC,
    2. Dos Santos RA,
    3. Poersch A,
    4. Carrara HH,
    5. de Andrade JM,
    6. Takahashi CS
    : DNA repair in Etoposide-induced DNA damage in lymphocytes of breast cancer patients and healthy women. Int J Clin Exp Med 2: 280-288, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Madondo MT,
    2. Quinn M,
    3. Plebanski M
    : Low-dose cyclophosphamide: Mechanisms of T-cell modulation. Cancer Treat Rev 42: 3-9, 2016.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 4
April 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cytogenetic Biomonitoring in Buccal Mucosa Cells from Women Submitted to Chemotherapy After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
7 + 6 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Cytogenetic Biomonitoring in Buccal Mucosa Cells from Women Submitted to Chemotherapy After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
ANA CAROLINA FLYGARE SOUZA, VICTOR HUGO PEREIRA DA SILVA, CAMILA SEIXAS, TANIA TEREZINHA DE OLIVEIRA SCUDELLER, MARIA TERESA PACE DO AMARAL, DANIEL ARAKI RIBEIRO
Anticancer Research Apr 2016, 36 (4) 1955-1958;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Cytogenetic Biomonitoring in Buccal Mucosa Cells from Women Submitted to Chemotherapy After Mastectomy for Breast Cancer
ANA CAROLINA FLYGARE SOUZA, VICTOR HUGO PEREIRA DA SILVA, CAMILA SEIXAS, TANIA TEREZINHA DE OLIVEIRA SCUDELLER, MARIA TERESA PACE DO AMARAL, DANIEL ARAKI RIBEIRO
Anticancer Research Apr 2016, 36 (4) 1955-1958;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Increased DNA Damage, Instability and Cytokinesis Defects in Occupationally Exposed Car Painters
  • Genomic Instability and Cytotoxicity in Buccal Mucosal Cells of Workers in Banana Farming Evaluated by Micronucleus Test
  • Genomic Instability in Buccal Mucosal Cells of Municipal Street Sweepers as Evaluated by Micronucleus Test
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Optimizing Biopsy Decisions in PI-RADS 3-4 Lesions: Integrating PSA-derived Biomarkers to Reduce Unnecessary Procedures
  • Surgical Outcomes and Postoperative Changes in Nutritional Indexes and Sarcopenia Markers in Oldest-old Patients With Resected Biliary Tract Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
  • Effect of Tissue Sample Type on The Evaluation of PD-L1 (SP142) Expression in Breast Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Oral mucosa cells
  • Breast cancer
  • chemotherapy
  • micronucleus test
Anticancer Research

© 2025 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire