Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Review ArticlePROCEEDINGS OF THE CHINA –UNITED KINGDOM CANCER (CUKC) CONFERENCE 2015 (Cardiff, Wales, UK)R

Tumour–Endothelial Cell Communications: Important and Indispensable Mediators of Tumour Angiogenesis

BRUNO MIGUEL LOPES-BASTOS, WEN G. JIANG and JUN CAI
Anticancer Research March 2016, 36 (3) 1119-1126;
BRUNO MIGUEL LOPES-BASTOS
Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative, Institute of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
WEN G. JIANG
Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative, Institute of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUN CAI
Cardiff China Medical Research Collaborative, Institute of Cancer & Genetics, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, U.K.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: caiJ5@cf.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Angiogenesis is an essential aspect of tumour growth and metastasis. Solid tumours cannot grow beyond 2-3 mm in diameter without inducing the formation of new blood vessels to support the energetic requirements of tumour cells. Angiogenesis is stimulated by cancer cells through a wide variety of cell-to-cell communication means. Cancer cells can induce endothelial changes by directly targeting cells via soluble factors, adhesion receptors, gap junctions and vesicles. They also can stimulate endothelial signaling pathways in an indirect way, e.g. by activating stromal cells, by secreting proteases into the extracellular space or even by changing the pH, temperature and availability of oxygen and nutrients. Anti-angiogenic drugs appear to be an effective cancer treatment in animal models but have been shown to have a limited effect in the long term. Resistance to anti-angiogenic therapies has been attributed to the ability of cancer cells to induce angiogenesis in a different way. We propose that cancer cells also change the way they communicate with endothelial cells in order to escape therapies that inhibit angiogenesis and that a better knowledge of this phenomenon will help us design more efficient drugs.

  • Cell-to-cell communication
  • tumour angiogenesis
  • anti-angiogenic therapy
  • drug resistance
  • review

Cell-to-cell communication is necessary for proper coordination of cell activity. It has been long known that the failure of cell communication can lead to severe diseases, such as immune disorders (1) and heart failure (2). Cells can send signals which can activate their own receptors (autocrine), target a neighbouring cell (paracrine) or target a distant cell (endocrine). There also exist different means of cell communication: it can occur through soluble factors, adhesion contacts, cell junctions or through vesicles (3).

Tumours are comprised not only of tumour cells but also of other cell types, called stromal cells, creating the perfect microenvironment for tumour development. Fibroblasts and macrophages are the two most common stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment. Tumour cells are able to attract and transform these stromal cells via communicating with them. Studies have shown that the aggressiveness and growth of tumours decreases when these communications are reduced or stopped (4, 5). For this reason, the development of strategies to block the communication between tumour and stromal cells has been an important area in cancer research.

Endothelial cells are another stromal cell type present in the tumour microenvironment. It has been shown that tumours cannot grow beyond 2-3 mm in diameter without proper vasculature to fulfil tumour cell energetic requirements. In order to continue their growth, tumour cells induce formation of new blood vessels from an existing one, which is called angiogenesis. Tumour angiogenesis not only provides the tumour cells with nutrients and oxygen, and allows removal of metabolic wastes, but also presents the metastatic tumour cells with points of entry to the circulatory system. The signal exchange between tumour and endothelial cells is critical to the development of tumour angiogenesis. The interruption of this signal exchange can lead to reduced vasculature within the tumour and reduced tumour size (6). This might serve as an additional target for anti-angiogenic strategy, even though the idea of anti-angiogenic therapy has been a long-standing area of interest (7).

In this mini-review, we summarize the different means by which tumour cells can communicate with endothelial cells in terms of tumour angiogenesis. We also briefly touch on the issues of anti-angiogenic therapy and drug resistance.

Direct Cell-to-cell Communication

In this section, we review the different ways that cancer cells can target endothelial cells in a direct way through soluble factors, activation of a receptor by physical contact, gap junctions and vesicles (Figure 1).

Soluble factors. The most common means of cell communication is through soluble factors, where a signaling cell secretes a protein into the extracellular space which targets a neighbouring cell or travels through the bloodstream and targets a cell at a distant site. The soluble factor usually binds to a tyrosine kinase receptor and triggers an intracellular response but they can also activate ion channels. The vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are a very well-known family of vascular development modulators (8). There are five VEGF proteins secreted in mammals (VEGFA, -B, -C and -D and placental growth factor) that can bind to three tyrosine kinase receptors (VEGFR1, -2 and -3) (9). In vascular endothelial cells, VEGFA is the most well-studied ligand and as a result we have a clear idea of its role in cells. VEGFA binds to its receptors, VEGFR1 and VEGFR2, triggering an intracellular response that is responsible for modulating the proliferation, migration, permeability and tip cell filopodia induction (10). Interestingly, VEGFA has a high affinity to bind VEGFR1, but this receptor has a weak response to this ligand, generating weak tyrosine auto-phosphorylation (11). Endothelial cells can also express two different isoforms of this receptor, one that is the normal receptor localized in the membrane that can generate an intracellular signaling pathway, and a second one that is secreted into the extracellular space, binding VEGFA and working as an anti-angiogenic mechanism by inhibiting VEGFA (12).

Almost all tumours express VEGFA that it is considered the most significant angiogenic factor in tumours (7, 13). Since tumour angiogenesis is dependent on VEGFA, many drugs have been developed to target this pathway, among them, bevacizuma (Avastin®). This medication, which is an antibody against VEGFA, has limited effects in the majority of advanced malignancies. However, the administration of this drug in combination with chemotherapy has shown an improvement in the treatment (14, 15).

A study using frog mesenteric microvessels showed that VEGF increases the concentration of intracellular calcium, that was accompanied by an increase in endothelial permeability. The use of two activators of transient receptor potential channel 6 (TRPC6), 1-oleoyl-2-acetylglycerol and flufenamic acid, had the same effect, suggesting that VEGF might activate TRPC6 and increase calcium influx. TRPC6 and -7 have been identified in endothelial cells of human lung artery and both these channels are permeable to magnesium. Calcium and magnesium are both known to regulate endothelial functional, including angiogenesis (16). These findings suggest that VEGFA might regulate the activation of these channels in cancer, therefore contributing to angiogenesis.

Adhesion contacts/adhesion receptors. Under normal conditions, cells interact with their microenvironment, e.g. the extracellular matrix (ECM) and neighbouring cells. Cell adhesion receptors are essential proteins that contribute not only to the adhesive process between cells but also to the activation of intracellular signaling pathways. These receptors can activate enzymatic proteins located by the intracellular fragment of the receptor, and can also bind to adaptor proteins and to the cellular cytoskeletal. Adhesion receptors are regulated by intracellular signals as they exist in protein complexes that are dynamically adjusted in response to a stimulus, being translocated into the membrane sites of the adhesion. Adhesion receptors are critical in the regulation of migration. Therefore, the dynamic regulation of these adhesion complexes is a crucial feature of angiogenesis.

Another example of the importance of adhesion receptors in communication between cancer cells and endothelial cells is its role in tumour angiogenesis. Osteoprotegerin (OPG) is a pro-angiogenic protein that was found overexpressed in breast cancer tissue (17). In vitro studies showed that the direct contact between breast cancer cells and endothelial cells is partially responsible for the increase in endothelial OPG through integrin ανβ3 ligation and nuclear factor-kappa B activation (18). Chen et al. also demonstrated in vitro that JAGGED1 transmembrane protein expressed in breast cancer tumour cells can activate the NOTCH receptor in endothelial cells and trigger an angiogenic cascade (19).

Gap junctions. Another way that neighbouring cells can communicate with each other is through gap junctions, where they can exchange ions and small metabolites, providing a connection between the cytoplasm of the two cells (20, 21). Connexin is the primary group of proteins that form these channels. The connexin family comprises of 21 different proteins that have a tissue and cell type specific expression pattern. Connexin has been reported to have a part in tumour progression, but its role it is still not clear (22). The down-regulation of connexin 26 (CX26) has been shown to increase the aggressiveness of melanoma cells (23) and the knockdown of CX43 increased the growth and migration of breast cancer cells (24). Breast cancer cells treated with ACT1, a compound that stabilises CX43 gap junctions, had an adverse effect on the proliferation and survival of cancer cells (25). Although these studies suggest that gap junctions in cancer cells could be a good prognostic marker, CX26 and CX43 immunohistochemical analysis of breast cancer samples might complicate this assumption (26). Most primary tumours presented cytoplasmic expression of CX26, but not membranous. Although primary tumours exhibited cytoplasmic and membranous expression of CX43, it was predominantly cytoplasmic. When the expression of both connexins was evaluated in the matched metastases, membranous expression of CX43 was enhanced in the lymph node metastases and membranous CX26 was only present in the metastatic site (26). These findings suggest that connexins might have various roles in the different stages of the tumour progression. Several studies have shown that connexins are important in the adhesion of cancer cells to vessels and in the intravasation of cancer cells, suggesting that gap junctions between cancer cells and endothelial cells might be an important aspect of tumour progression (27-29). Confocal images confirmed that CX43 connections between cancer cells and endothelial cells are formed under in vitro and in vivo conditions and that those connections correspond to functional gap junctions, capable of exchanging fluid between the two types of cells (27-29). Moreover, Zang and collaborators demonstrated that glioma cells can establish gap junctions with endothelial cells, enhancing tube formation in vitro (30). Gap junctions can also propagate electrical signals between neighbouring cells and it has been shown that electrical stimulation induces angiogenic responses in endothelial cells by activating VEGFR (31, 32).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Schematic representation of the different means of communication between cancer and endothelial cells. ECM: extracellular matrix; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor.

In summary, gap junctions between cancer cells and endothelial cells occur and seem to be important in the adherence of cancer cells to vessels and in the intravasation of cancer cells. Despite the lack of evidence that gap junctions between cancer cells and endothelial cells have an impact on tumour angiogenesis, they might play a significant role in the initiation of metastasis.

Vesicles. Recently, a different means of cell communication has been described which consists of secreted membrane vesicles that merge into target cells. There are several types of vesicles, including microvesicles, ectosomes, membrane particles and exosomes. Exosomes are one of the most studied vesicle types. They have an endosomal origin and are 30-100 nm in diameter. In the signalling cell, exosomes are present in multivesicular bodies which are released into the extracellular space, then merge with the plasma membranes of the recipient cells. These vesicles can have different cargo molecules, such as proteins, lipids and RNAs (33). The function of exosomes is still unclear, especially in the context of cancer. Many studies have demonstrated a role of exosomes in different aspects of cancer progression, such as angiogenesis, promotion of metastasis and modulation of the immune system (reviewed in 34). The role of exosomes seems to depend highly on their composition (35).

Several studies have shown that exosomes derived from cancer cells induce angiogenesis, in vitro and in vivo. Exosomes purified from leukaemia cells under hypoxic conditions induced approximately two-fold endothelial cell tubule formation than those purified from leukaemia cells under normoxic conditions. MicroRNA-210 (miR-210) was shown to be up-regulated in exosomes from hypoxic leukaemia cells. The exosomal miR-210 was able to directly down-regulate the expression of the anti-angiogenic protein Ephrin-A3 by reducing its promotor activity (35). This demonstrates that exosomes carry functional molecules capable of modulating gene expression in the target cell. It also shows that the exosome cargo can differ according to the stress of the signalling cell. Exosomes can target neighbouring cells, but they also can travel through the bloodstream and modulate the gene expression of cells at distant sites. Human renal carcinoma cells expressing CD105 (stem cell marker) secrete exosomes that have been shown to trigger in vitro and in vivo angiogenesis (36). Profiling of exosomes revealed the presence of many pro-angiogenic mRNAs and microRNAs (36). Intravenous daily injection of exosomes into mice for 5 days enhanced lung metastasis which had been induced by injection of renal carcinoma cells (36). This could be due to angiogenesis stimulation which facilitates intravasation of cancer cells and also supports tumour growth. These findings demonstrate that exosomes induce angiogenesis and are important in the formation of pre-metastatic niches.

Urinary exosomes isolated from patients with high-grade bladder cancer promoted angiogenesis and cell migration (in vivo) (37). Epidermal growth factor-like repeats and discoidin I-like domains 3 (EDIL3) protein is overexpressed in many cancer types and has been associated with poor prognosis (37). This protein was found in exosomes derived from bladder cancer cell lines and patients. EDIL3 knockdown demonstrated that this protein is essential for exosomes to promote angiogenesis in vitro. EDIL3 can activate epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling and by using the EGFR kinase inhibitor Ag1478, it was demonstrated that exosomal bladder cancer cells induce angiogenesis in an EGFR-dependent way (37).

Tumour cells use exosomes as a way to modulate endothelial gene expression and induce angiogenesis. Furthermore, as exosomes are found in blood and urine, and they can reflect the aggressiveness of cancer, they have been studied as a predictive marker.

Indirect Cell-to-cell Communication

Tumour cells can also induce angiogenesis in an indirect way via stromal cells or by changing the tumour microenvironment, such as by secreting proteases into the ECM (Figure 1).

Stromal cells. For many decades, researchers had focused on cancer cells themselves, but nowadays we know that tumours comprise of tumour parenchyma and stroma, both distinct parts that communicate with each other to stimulate tumour progression. Growing evidence shows that stromal cells play an important role in tumour initiation, progression and metastasis. The most abundant stromal cells in connective tissues are fibroblasts, which secrete molecules into the ECM. Fibroblasts have been found to be activated in wound healing and fibrosis, which are characterized by an increase in the expression of alpha-smooth muscle actin and extra domain A (ED-A) splice of fibronectin (38). Recently, fibroblasts have been found to be activated within the tumour microenvironment. These fibroblasts are called cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and interestingly, they are very similar to those found in wounds and inflammatory sites (39). The origin of CAFs is still unclear but some studies suggest that they are activated local fibroblasts, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells or cancer cells after epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Cancer cells can activate fibroblasts by targeting them with cancer-secreted factors, such as transforming growth factor-β and C-X-C motif chemokine 12 (CXCL12)/ stromal cell-derived factor-1 (40).

There are many studies showing the involvement of CAFs in tumour angiogenesis, for example, Tang and collaborators (41) showed that CAFs highly express galectin-1, a pro-angiogenic protein. Co-culture experiments demonstrated that CAFs increase human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) proliferation, migration, tube formation and VEGFR2 phosphorylation in a galectin-1-dependent manner. They also showed that galectin-1 accelerated tumour growth and promoted angiogenesis in vivo.

Proteases. The ECM is the structural support of endothelial cells, which under normal physiological conditions induces stable vessels by inhibiting angiogenesis through activation of endothelial receptors. In solid cancer, cancer cells and activated stromal cells secrete not only proteins into the ECM but also proteases which degrade ECM proteins (42). This way, a change in the composition of the ECM induced by cancer cells leading to a change in the endothelial phenotype, can be interpreted as another way of communication between these two cell types.

VEGF, as discussed above, is an essential pro-angiogenic molecule in cancer. It has been shown in vitro that most VEGF bind to ECM proteins secreted by cancer cells (43, 44) and the degradation of ECM proteins is required for access of VEGF to the endothelial cells in order to induce angiogenesis. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are the main group of proteases secreted by cancer and stromal cells that are capable of degrading ECM proteins. Many MMPs have been implicated in this process, for example, VEGF forms a complex with connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) and MMP3 and MMP7 were able to release VEGF from this complex by degrading CTGF (43). Interestingly, a set of in vivo experiments demonstrated that different concentrations of VEGF can regulate various aspects of tumour angiogenesis (45), giving an even more important role to proteases in this process.

Degradation of collagen type IV, CXC chemokines and thrombospondin 1 also produces peptides that can have pro- or anti-angiogenic properties (46, 47).

The studies described above show that proteases have a major role in tumour angiogenesis and are an important method of communication between cancer and endothelial cells.

Other forms of indirect communication. Solid tumours are characterised by inadequate perfusion and high metabolic rates, leading to a transiently or chronically hypoxic and acidic environment. The pH of the tissue is usually related to glucose consumption (48). These changes in the microenvironment are created by the high metabolic rate of tumour cells and not as a means of communication, at least in our current understanding. However, these conditions will constrain and even change the behaviour of stromal cells within the tumour microenvironment. If we take the example of a single cancer cell that invades a new organ, it will create an acidic and hypoxic microenvironment that will affect the cells around it; this phenomenon could be interpreted as cell communication. For instance, Jiang et al. showed that culturing HUVECs under hypoxic conditions for 25 days completely changed the gene-expression profile of these cells and, more importantly, these cells enhanced their response to fibroblast growth factor 2 and VEGFA, essential angiogenic proteins regarding cell migration and proliferation (49).

Another characteristic of the microenvironment of tumours is the deprivation of nutrients, which has been shown to change the response of endothelial cells to other stimuli, such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNFα). HUVECs increase superoxide production under starvation conditions, but more interestingly, the production of superoxide is even more increased if cells are treated with TNFα. However, TNFα alone does not affect the production of superoxide under standard conditions (50). The temperature is also increased in the tumour microenvironment and endothelial cells have temperature-sensing receptors that can modulate calcium influx or NO release (51).

We support the idea that a change in the tumour microenvironment, even as the secondary effect of cancer cell metabolism, can be interpreted as a means of communication and its role in cancer angiogenesis should be investigated.

Anti-angiogenic Therapy and Drug Resistance

The awareness that anti-angiogenic therapies could be one major step towards the prevention of cancer progression arose after studies showing that angiogenesis is essential for the growth of primary solid tumours and metastasis. Hypoxic cancer cells activate hypoxia-inducible factor-1α that triggers a signaling pathway inducing cells to express growth factors, e.g. VEGF, FGF2 and platelet-derived growth factor. VEGF can be up-regulated in cancer cells by oncogenes, such as RAS (52, 53), or after loss of tumour suppressors, such as phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) and Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) (54, 55). Growth factors can then target endothelial cells and induce proliferation, migration and capillary formation. The newly formed microvessels bring oxygen and nutrients to feed the cancer cells, allowing the tumour to grow.

As already mentioned, VEGFA plays a significant role in this process and many drugs have been developed to target its pathway. The most studied VEGFA drug is bevacizumab, which is a recombinant humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody. It binds to VEGFA, neutralizing it and preventing it from activating its receptor. This antibody was capable of slowing tumour growth in animal models (56). Interestingly, it had a more beneficial effect when used in combination with chemotherapy (57), by increasing the stability of the tumour vasculature, contributing to better cytotoxic drug delivery (58).

Despite the efforts towards creating drugs to inhibit the VEGF signalling pathway, clinical trials showed that these drugs do not constrain angiogenesis for a long time. Anti-angiogenic treatments usually do not prolong the overall survival of patients with breast (59), renal cell carcinoma (60) or colon (61, 62) cancer. Moreover, an animal study demonstrated that anti-angiogenic drugs can actually increase the aggressiveness of tumours (63). A possible explanation for this is given by Conley and collaborators (64). They showed that when they used anti-angiogenic drugs, tumour cells activated hypoxia responses but more importantly, they activated the protein kinase B–β-catenin pathway which is involved in cell growth, making tumours more aggressive. Fascinatingly, tumours that were first sensitive to a therapy but developed resistance have been shown to become sensitive to that therapy following treatment with a different agent (65). This suggests that tumour resistance to therapy is an adaptation and not a result of a gene mutation or amplification. Another consideration regarding the use of this kind of agent is that studies conducted in mouse models showed that anti-angiogenic drugs increased the invasive potential of cancer cells from the primary site, increasing the number of metastases that occurred (66). This could be explained by the fact that a hypoxic environment is hostile to cancer cells, which might cause them to migrate to other tissues (67).

Tumours that respond well to single anti-angiogenic therapy might suggest that the tumour vasculature is very sensitive to that particular drug and also that the tumour cells are very dependent on the supply of oxygen and nutrients. The vasculature can also be sensitive to the drug but cancer cells adapt to the new conditions in order to survive. Lastly, anti-angiogenic therapy may have no significant effect on tumour vasculature. The disease can be controlled for a period of time after anti-angiogenic therapy, but this is followed by tumour progression. In this case, at least one of two things happened, the tumour found a different way to drive angiogenesis, or tumour cells adapted to a less-vascularized environment (6).

Adaptation of tumours to anti-angiogenic drugs can be due to the switch of the VEGF pathway to a different pro-angiogenic pathway. Many other molecules secreted by cancer cells have been described as being pro-angiogenic, such as EGF (68), FGF2 (69) and interleukin-8 (70). Another mechanism used by tumours to overcome the effect of these drugs is to recruit stromal cells; fibroblasts have also been shown to confer resistance to anti-angiogenic drugs (71).

The type of cell-to-cell communication established between cancer cells and endothelial cells should also be considered in the phenomenon of drug resistance. Connexins have an important role in the development and progression of breast cancer. However, their role varies according to the type of connexin, type of cancer and stage of cancer progression. The prognostic potential of connexins was evaluated in a study involving patients with breast cancer, where high CX26 expression was correlated with a poor prognosis and low CX26 and high CX46 correlated with a good prognosis. The expression pattern of these connexions was also shown to change after chemotherapy (72). These findings suggest that cell communication, gap junctions in this case, is involved in the aggressiveness of the tumour and might be important in the prediction of prognosis. More importantly, it suggests that tumours can change their way of communicating after a treatment, perhaps enabling them to overcome therapeutic inhibition.

Conclusion and Future Directions

Herein we revised the different ways that cancer cells can communicate with endothelial cells and induce angiogenesis in order to fulfil the energetic requirements of tumour cells. We showed that cancer cells have a wide and complex variety of means of communicating with endothelial cells. Based on the information presented in this review, we argue that not only is a better understanding of the pathways of angiogenesis activated within tumour needed, but also a more comprehensive knowledge of how cancer cells trigger these pathways is essential. Furthermore, the investigation of the role of cell-to-cell communication between cancer and endothelial cells in different types of cancers and in the different stages of tumour progression will enable the development of better therapies. Finally, we also support the idea that cancer cells might change their type of cell-to-cell communication targeting endothelial cells in order to overcome anti-angiogenic therapy.

Acknowledgements

The Authors would like to thank Bethan Frugtniet who assisted in the proof-reading of the manuscript.

  • Received January 4, 2016.
  • Revision received February 17, 2016.
  • Accepted February 18, 2016.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Allen RC,
    2. Armitage RJ,
    3. Conley ME,
    4. Rosenblatt H,
    5. Jenkins NA,
    6. Copeland NG,
    7. Bedell MA,
    8. Edelhoff S,
    9. Disteche CM,
    10. Simoneaux DK,
    11. Fanslow WC,
    12. Belmont J,
    13. Spriggs MK
    : CD40 ligand gene defects responsible for X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome. Science 259: 990-993, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. De Mello WC
    : Impaired regulation of cell communication by beta-adrenergic receptor activation in the failing heart. Hypertension 27: 265-268, 1996.
    OpenUrl
  3. ↵
    1. Camussi G,
    2. Deregibus MC,
    3. Bruno S,
    4. Cantaluppi V,
    5. Biancone L
    : Exosomes/microvesicles as a mechanism of cell-to-cell communication. Kidney int 78: 838-848, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Matsuda Y,
    2. Yoshimura H,
    3. Suzuki T,
    4. Uchida E,
    5. Naito Z,
    6. Ishiwata T
    : Inhibition of fibroblast growth factor receptor 2 attenuates proliferation and invasion of pancreatic cancer. Cancer sci 105: 1212-1219, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Lin Y,
    2. Wei C,
    3. Liu Y,
    4. Qiu Y,
    5. Liu C,
    6. Guo F
    : Selective ablation of tumor-associated macrophages suppresses metastasis and angiogenesis. Cancer Sci 104: 1217-1225, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Vasudev NS,
    2. Reynolds AR
    : Anti-angiogenic therapy for cancer: current progress, unresolved questions and future directions. Angiogenesis 17: 471-494, 2014.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Folkman J
    : Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med 285: 1182-1186, 1971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Coultas L,
    2. Chawengsaksophak K,
    3. Rossant J
    : Endothelial cells and VEGF in vascular development. Nature 438: 937-945, 2005.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Olsson AK,
    2. Dimberg A,
    3. Kreuger J,
    4. Claesson-Welsh L
    : VEGF receptor signalling – in control of vascular function. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 359-371, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Blanco R,
    2. Gerhardt H
    : VEGF and NOTCH in tip and stalk cell selection. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 3: a006569, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kendall RL,
    2. Thomas KA
    : Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell growth factor activity by an endogenously encoded soluble receptor. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90: 10705-10709, 1993.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Ambati BK,
    2. Nozaki M,
    3. Singh N,
    4. Takeda A,
    5. Jani PD,
    6. Suthar T,
    7. Albuquerque RJ,
    8. Richter E,
    9. Sakurai E,
    10. Newcomb MT,
    11. Kleinman ME,
    12. Caldwell RB,
    13. Lin Q,
    14. Ogura Y,
    15. Orecchia A,
    16. Samuelson DA,
    17. Agnew DW,
    18. St Leger J,
    19. Green WR,
    20. Mahasreshti PJ,
    21. Curiel DT,
    22. Kwan D,
    23. Marsh H,
    24. Ikeda S,
    25. Leiper LJ,
    26. Collinson JM,
    27. Bogdanovich S,
    28. Khurana TS,
    29. Shibuya M,
    30. Baldwin ME,
    31. Ferrara N,
    32. Gerber HP,
    33. De Falco S,
    34. Witta J,
    35. Baffi JZ,
    36. Raisler BJ,
    37. Ambati J
    : Corneal avascularity is due to soluble VEGF receptor-1. Nature 443: 993-997, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ferrara N,
    2. Gerber HP,
    3. LeCouter J
    : The biology of VEGF and its receptors. Nat Med 9: 669-676, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Hurwitz H,
    2. Fehrenbacher L,
    3. Novotny W,
    4. Cartwright T,
    5. Hainsworth J,
    6. Heim W,
    7. Berlin J,
    8. Baron A,
    9. Griffing S,
    10. Holmgren E,
    11. Ferrara N,
    12. Fyfe G,
    13. Rogers B,
    14. Ross R,
    15. Kabbinavar F
    : Bevacizumab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 350: 2335-2342, 2004.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Miller K,
    2. Wang M,
    3. Gralow J,
    4. Dickler M,
    5. Cobleigh M,
    6. Perez EA,
    7. Shenkier T,
    8. Cella D,
    9. Davidson NE
    : Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab versus paclitaxel alone for metastatic breast cancer. N Eng J Med 357: 2666-2676, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Pocock TM,
    2. Foster RR,
    3. Bates DO
    : Evidence of a role for TRPC channels in VEGF-mediated increased vascular permeability in vivo. Am J Physio Heart Circ Physiol 286: H1015-1026, 2004.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    1. Cross SS,
    2. Yang Z,
    3. Brown NJ,
    4. Balasubramanian SP,
    5. Evans CA,
    6. Woodward JK,
    7. Neville-webbe HL,
    8. Lippitt JM,
    9. Reed MWR,
    10. Coleman RE,
    11. Holen I
    : Osteoprotegerin (OPG) – a potential new role in the regulation of endothelialcell phenotype and tumour angiogenesis? Int J Cancer 118: 1901-1908, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Reid PE,
    2. Brown NJ,
    3. Holen I
    : Breast cancer cells stimulate osteoprotegerin (OPG) production by endothelial cells through direct cell contact. Mol Cancer 8: 49, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Chen H,
    2. Liu D,
    3. Yang Z,
    4. Sun L,
    5. Deng Q,
    6. Yang S,
    7. Qian L,
    8. Guo L,
    9. Yu M,
    10. Hu M,
    11. Shi M,
    12. Guo N
    : Adrenergic signaling promotes angiogenesis through endothelial cell–tumor cell crosstalk. Endocr Relat Cancer 21: 783-795, 2014.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Eugenin EA,
    2. Basilio D,
    3. Saez JC,
    4. Orellana JA,
    5. Raine CS,
    6. Bukauskas F,
    7. Bennett MV,
    8. Berman JW
    : The role of gap junction channels during physiologic and pathologic conditions of the human central nervous system. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol 7: 499-518, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Halidi N,
    2. Alonso F,
    3. Burt JM,
    4. Beny JL,
    5. Haefliger JA,
    6. Meister JJ
    : Intercellular calcium waves in primary cultured rat mesenteric smooth muscle cells are mediated by connexin-43. Cell commun Adhes 19: 25-37, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. McLachlan E,
    2. Shao Q,
    3. Laird DW
    : Connexins and gap junctions in mammary gland development and breast cancer progression. J Membr Biol 218: 107-121, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Kamibayashi Y,
    2. Oyamada Y,
    3. Mori M,
    4. Oyamada M
    : Aberrant expression of gap junction proteins (connexins) is associated with tumor progression during multistage mouse skin carcinogenesis in vivo. Carcinogenesis 16: 1287-1297, 1995.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Shao Q,
    2. Wang H,
    3. McLachlan E,
    4. Veitch GI,
    5. Laird DW
    : Down-regulation of CX43 by retroviral delivery of small interfering RNA promotes an aggressive breast cancer cell phenotype. Cancer Res 65: 2705-2711, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Grek CL,
    2. Rhett JM,
    3. Bruce JS,
    4. Abt MA,
    5. Ghatnekar GS,
    6. Yeh ES
    : Targeting connexin 43 with alpha-connexin carboxyl-terminal (ACT1) peptide enhances the activity of the targeted inhibitors, tamoxifen and lapatinib, in breast cancer: clinical implication for ACT1. BMC Cancer 15: 296, 2015.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Kanczuga-Koda L,
    2. Sulkowski S,
    3. Lenczewski A,
    4. Koda M,
    5. Wincewicz A,
    6. Baltaziak M,
    7. Sulkowska M
    : Increased expression of connexins 26 and 43 in lymph node metastases of breast cancer. J Clin Pathol 59: 429-433, 2006.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Pollmann MA,
    2. Shao Q,
    3. Laird DW,
    4. Sandig M
    : Connexin 43-mediated gap junctional communication enhances breast tumor cell diapedesis in culture. Breast Cancer Res BCR 7: R522-534, 2005.
    OpenUrl
    1. Elzarrad MK,
    2. Haroon A,
    3. Willecke K,
    4. Dobrowolski R,
    5. Gillespie MN,
    6. Al-Mehdi AB
    : Connexin-43 up-regulation in micrometastases and tumor vasculature and its role in tumor cell attachment to pulmonary endothelium. BMC Med 6: 20, 2008.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Ito A,
    2. Katoh F,
    3. Kataoka TR,
    4. Okada M,
    5. Tsubota N,
    6. Asada H,
    7. Yoshikawa K,
    8. Maeda S,
    9. Kitamura Y,
    10. Yamasaki H,
    11. Nojima H
    : A role for heterologous gap junctions between melanoma and endothelial cells in metastasis. J Clin Invest 105: 1189-1197, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Zhang W,
    2. DeMattia JA,
    3. Song H,
    4. Couldwell WT
    : Communication between malignant glioma cells and vascular endothelial cells through gap junctions. J Neurosurg 98: 846-853, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Zhao M,
    2. Bai H,
    3. Wang E,
    4. Forrester JV,
    5. McCaig CD
    : Electrical stimulation directly induces pre-angiogenic responses in vascular endothelial cells by signaling through VEGF receptors. J Cell Sci 117: 397-405, 2004.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Bai H,
    2. Forrester JV,
    3. Zhao M
    : DC electric stimulation up-regulates angiogenic factors in endothelial cells through activation of VEGF receptors. Cytokine 55: 110-115, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Tang MK,
    2. Wong AS
    : Exosomes: Emerging biomarkers and targets for ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett 367: 26-33, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Yu S,
    2. Cao H,
    3. Shen B,
    4. Feng J
    : Tumor-derived exosomes in cancer progression and treatment failure. Oncotarget 6: 37151-68, 2015.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Tadokoro H,
    2. Umezu T,
    3. Ohyashiki K,
    4. Hirano T,
    5. Ohyashiki JH
    : Exosomes derived from hypoxic leukemia cells enhance tube formation in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem 288: 34343-34351, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Grange C,
    2. Tapparo M,
    3. Collino F,
    4. Vitillo L,
    5. Damasco C,
    6. Deregibus MC,
    7. Tetta C,
    8. Bussolati B,
    9. Camussi G
    : Microvesicles released from human renal cancer stem cells stimulate angiogenesis and formation of lung pre-metastatic niche. Cancer Res 71: 5346-5356, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Beckham CJ,
    2. Olsen J,
    3. Yin PN,
    4. Wu CH,
    5. Ting HJ,
    6. Hagen FK,
    7. Scosyrev E,
    8. Messing EM,
    9. Lee YF
    : Bladder cancer exosomes contain EDIL3/DEL1 and facilitate cancer progression. J Urol 192: 583-592, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Gabbiani G,
    2. Ryan GB,
    3. Majne G
    : Presence of modified fibroblasts in granulation tissue and their possible role in wound contraction. Experientia 27: 549-550, 1971.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Dvorak HF
    : Tumors: wounds that do not heal. Similarities between tumor stroma generation and wound healing. N Eng J Med 315: 1650-1659, 1986.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Kojima Y,
    2. Acar A,
    3. Eaton EN,
    4. Mellody KT,
    5. Scheel C,
    6. Ben-Porath I,
    7. Onder TT,
    8. Wang ZC,
    9. Richardson AL,
    10. Weinberg RA,
    11. Orimo A
    : Autocrine TGFβ and stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) signaling drives the evolution of tumor-promoting mammary stromal myofibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 20009-20014, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Tang D,
    2. Gao J,
    3. Wang S,
    4. Ye N,
    5. Chong Y,
    6. Huang Y,
    7. Wang J,
    8. Li B,
    9. Yin W,
    10. Wang D
    : Cancer-associated fibroblasts promote angiogenesis in gastric cancer through galectin-1 expression. Tumour Biol 1-11, 2015.
  41. ↵
    1. Campbell NE,
    2. Kellenberger L,
    3. Greenaway J,
    4. Moorehead RA,
    5. Linnerth-Petrik NM,
    6. Petrik J
    : Extracellular matrix proteins and tumor angiogenesis. J Oncol 2010: 586905, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Hashimoto G,
    2. Inoki I,
    3. Fujii Y,
    4. Aoki T,
    5. Ikeda E,
    6. Okada Y
    : Matrix metalloproteinases cleave connective tissue growth factor and reactivate angiogenic activity of vascular endothelial growth factor 165. J Biol Chem 277: 36288-36295, 2002.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Ebrahem Q,
    2. Chaurasia SS,
    3. Vasanji A,
    4. Qi JH,
    5. Klenotic PA,
    6. Cutler A,
    7. Asosingh K,
    8. Erzurum S,
    9. Anand-Apte B
    : Cross-talk between vascular endothelial growth factor and matrix metalloproteinases in the induction of neovascularization in vivo. Am J Pathol 176: 496-503, 2010.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Parsons-Wingerter P,
    2. Chandrasekharan UM,
    3. McKay TL,
    4. Radhakrishnan K,
    5. DiCorleto PE,
    6. Albarran B,
    7. Farr AG
    : A VEGF165-induced phenotypic switch from increased vessel density to increased vessel diameter and increased endothelial NOS activity. Microvasc Res 72: 91-100, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Koskimaki JE,
    2. Karagiannis ED,
    3. Rosca EV,
    4. Vesuna F,
    5. Winnard PT Jr..,
    6. Raman V,
    7. Bhujwalla ZM,
    8. Popel AS
    : Peptides derived from type IV collagen, CXC chemokines and thrombospondin-1 domain-containing proteins inhibit neovascularization and suppress tumor growth in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer xenografts. Neoplasia 11: 1285-1291, 2009.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Rosca EV,
    2. Lal B,
    3. Koskimaki JE,
    4. Popel AS,
    5. Laterra J
    : Collagen IV and CXC chemokine-derived antiangiogenic peptides suppress glioma xenograft growth. Anticancer Drugs 23: 706-712, 2012.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Zhang X,
    2. Lin Y,
    3. Gillies RJ
    : Tumor pH and its measurement. J Nucl Med 51: 1167-1170, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Jiang YZ,
    2. Wang K,
    3. Li Y,
    4. Dai CF,
    5. Wang P,
    6. Kendziorski C,
    7. Chen DB,
    8. Zheng J
    : Transcriptional and functional adaptations of human endothelial cells to physiological chronic low oxygen. Biol Reprod 88: 114, 2013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Russell FD,
    2. Hamilton KD
    : Nutrient deprivation increases vulnerability of endothelial cells to proinflammatory insults. Free Radic Biol Med 67: 408-415, 2014.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Yao X,
    2. Garland CJ
    : Recent developments in vascular endothelial cell transient receptor potential channels. Circ Res 97: 853-863, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Milanini J,
    2. Vinals F,
    3. Pouyssegur J,
    4. Pages G
    : p42/p44 MAP kinase module plays a key role in the transcriptional regulation of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in fibroblasts. J Biol Chem 273: 18165-18172, 1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Rak J,
    2. Mitsuhashi Y,
    3. Sheehan C,
    4. Tamir A,
    5. Viloria-Petit A,
    6. Filmus J,
    7. Mansour SJ,
    8. Ahn NG,
    9. Kerbel RS
    : Oncogenes and tumor angiogenesis: differential modes of vascular endothelial growth factor up-regulation in RAS-transformed epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Cancer Res 60: 490-498, 2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Karar J,
    2. Maity A
    : PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway in angio-genesis. Front Mol Neurosci 4: 51, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Kaelin WG Jr..
    : The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and clear cell renal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 13: 680s-684s, 2007.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Byrne AT,
    2. Ross L,
    3. Holash J,
    4. Nakanishi M,
    5. Hu L,
    6. Hofmann JI,
    7. Yancopoulos GD,
    8. Jaffe RB
    : Vascular endothelial growth factor-trap decreases tumor burden, inhibits ascites and causes dramatic vascular remodeling in an ovarian cancer model. Clin Cancer Res 9: 5721-5728, 2003.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Gerber HP,
    2. Ferrara N
    : Pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of bevacizumab as monotherapy or in combination with cytotoxic therapy in preclinical studies. Cancer Res 65: 671-680, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    1. Jain RK
    : Normalization of tumor vasculature: an emerging concept in antiangiogenic therapy. Science 307: 58-62, 2005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Montero AJ,
    2. Escobar M,
    3. Lopes G,
    4. Gluck S,
    5. Vogel C
    : Bevacizumab in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: Friend or foe? Curr Oncol Rep 14: 1-11, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Escudier B,
    2. Bellmunt J,
    3. Negrier S,
    4. Bajetta E,
    5. Melichar B,
    6. Bracarda S,
    7. Ravaud A,
    8. Golding S,
    9. Jethwa S,
    10. Sneller V
    : Phase III trial of bevacizumab plus interferon alfa-2a in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (AVOREN): final analysis of overall survival. J Clin Oncol 28: 2144-2150, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Allegra CJ,
    2. Yothers G,
    3. O'Connell MJ,
    4. Sharif S,
    5. Petrelli NJ,
    6. Colangelo LH,
    7. Atkins JN,
    8. Seay TE,
    9. Fehrenbacher L,
    10. Goldberg RM,
    11. O'Reilly S,
    12. Chu L,
    13. Azar CA,
    14. Lopa S,
    15. Wolmark N
    : Phase III trial assessing bevacizumab in stages II and III carcinoma of the colon: results of NSABP protocol C-08. J Clin Oncol 29: 11-16, 2011.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. de Gramont A,
    2. Van Cutsem E,
    3. Schmoll HJ,
    4. Tabernero J,
    5. Clarke S,
    6. Moore MJ,
    7. Cunningham D,
    8. Cartwright TH,
    9. Hecht JR,
    10. Rivera F,
    11. Im SA,
    12. Bodoky G,
    13. Salazar R,
    14. Maindrault-Goebel F,
    15. Shacham-Shmueli E,
    16. Bajetta E,
    17. Makrutzki M,
    18. Shang A,
    19. Andre T,
    20. Hoff PM
    : Bevacizumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for colon cancer (AVANT): a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 13: 1225-1233, 2012.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Ranpura V,
    2. Hapani S,
    3. Wu S
    : Treatment-related mortality with bevacizumab in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. JAMA 305: 487-494, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Conley SJ,
    2. Gheordunescu E,
    3. Kakarala P,
    4. Newman B,
    5. Korkaya H,
    6. Heath AN,
    7. Clouthier SG,
    8. Wicha MS
    : Antiangiogenic agents increase breast cancer stem cells via the generation of tumor hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109: 2784-2789, 2012.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    1. Hammers HJ,
    2. Verheul HM,
    3. Salumbides B,
    4. Sharma R,
    5. Rudek M,
    6. Jaspers J,
    7. Shah P,
    8. Ellis L,
    9. Shen L,
    10. Paesante S,
    11. Dykema K,
    12. Furge K,
    13. Teh BT,
    14. Netto G,
    15. Pili R
    : Reversible epithelial to mesenchymal transition and acquired resistance to sunitinib in patients with renal cell carcinoma: evidence from a xenograft study. Mol Cancer Ther 9: 1525-1535, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Zuniga RM,
    2. Torcuator R,
    3. Jain R,
    4. Anderson J,
    5. Doyle T,
    6. Ellika S,
    7. Schultz L,
    8. Mikkelsen T
    : Efficacy, safety and patterns of response and recurrence in patients with recurrent high-grade gliomas treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan. J Neurooncol 91: 329-336, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Sullivan R,
    2. Graham CH
    : Hypoxia-driven selection of the metastatic phenotype. Cancer Metastasis Rev 26: 319-331, 2007.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. Cascone T,
    2. Herynk MH,
    3. Xu L,
    4. Du Z,
    5. Kadara H,
    6. Nilsson MB,
    7. Oborn CJ,
    8. Park YY,
    9. Erez B,
    10. Jacoby JJ,
    11. Lee JS,
    12. Lin HY,
    13. Ciardiello F,
    14. Herbst RS,
    15. Langley RR,
    16. Heymach JV
    : Up-regulated stromal EGFR and vascular remodeling in mouse xenograft models of angiogenesis inhibitor-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma. J Clin Invest 121: 1313-1328, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Welti JC,
    2. Gourlaouen M,
    3. Powles T,
    4. Kudahetti SC,
    5. Wilson P,
    6. Berney DM,
    7. Reynolds AR
    : Fibroblast growth factor 2 regulates endothelial cell sensitivity to sunitinib. Oncogene 30: 1183-1193, 2011.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Huang D,
    2. Ding Y,
    3. Zhou M,
    4. Rini BI,
    5. Petillo D,
    6. Qian CN,
    7. Kahnoski R,
    8. Futreal PA,
    9. Furge KA,
    10. Teh BT
    : Interleukin-8 mediates resistance to antiangiogenic agent sunitinib in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res 70: 1063-1071, 2010.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Crawford Y,
    2. Kasman I,
    3. Yu L,
    4. Zhong C,
    5. Wu X,
    6. Modrusan Z,
    7. Kaminker J,
    8. Ferrara N
    : PDGF-C mediates the angiogenic and tumorigenic properties of fibroblasts associated with tumors refractory to anti-VEGF treatment. Cancer cell 15: 21-34, 2009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  71. ↵
    1. Teleki I,
    2. Krenacs T,
    3. Szasz MA,
    4. Kulka J,
    5. Wichmann B,
    6. Leo C,
    7. Papassotiropoulos B,
    8. Riemenschnitter C,
    9. Moch H,
    10. Varga Z
    : The potential prognostic value of connexin 26 and 46 expression in neoadjuvant-treated breast cancer. BMC Cancer 13: 50, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research: 36 (3)
Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 3
March 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumour–Endothelial Cell Communications: Important and Indispensable Mediators of Tumour Angiogenesis
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 12 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Tumour–Endothelial Cell Communications: Important and Indispensable Mediators of Tumour Angiogenesis
BRUNO MIGUEL LOPES-BASTOS, WEN G. JIANG, JUN CAI
Anticancer Research Mar 2016, 36 (3) 1119-1126;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Tumour–Endothelial Cell Communications: Important and Indispensable Mediators of Tumour Angiogenesis
BRUNO MIGUEL LOPES-BASTOS, WEN G. JIANG, JUN CAI
Anticancer Research Mar 2016, 36 (3) 1119-1126;
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Direct Cell-to-cell Communication
    • Indirect Cell-to-cell Communication
    • Anti-angiogenic Therapy and Drug Resistance
    • Conclusion and Future Directions
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Suppression of endothelial miR-22-3p mediates non-small cell lung cancer cell-induced angiogenesis
  • Cancer and platelet crosstalk: opportunities and challenges for aspirin and other antiplatelet agents
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

PROCEEDINGS OF THE CHINA –UNITED KINGDOM CANCER (CUKC) CONFERENCE 2015 (Cardiff, Wales, UK)

  • Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer
  • Knockdown of EPHA1 by CRISPR/CAS9 Promotes Adhesion and Motility of HRT18 Colorectal Carcinoma Cells
  • Effective Treatment for Malignant Pleural Effusion and Ascites with Combined Therapy of Bevacizumab and Cisplatin
Show more PROCEEDINGS OF THE CHINA –UNITED KINGDOM CANCER (CUKC) CONFERENCE 2015 (Cardiff, Wales, UK)

Reviews

  • Cytokine-based Cancer Immunotherapy: Challenges and Opportunities for IL-10
  • Proteolytic Enzyme Therapy in Complementary Oncology: A Systematic Review
  • Multimodal Treatment of Primary Advanced Ovarian Cancer
Show more Reviews

Similar Articles

Keywords

  • Cell-to-cell communication
  • tumour angiogenesis
  • anti-angiogenic therapy
  • drug resistance
  • review
Anticancer Research

© 2023 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire