Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics

User menu

  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart

Search

  • Advanced search
Anticancer Research
  • Other Publications
    • Anticancer Research
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
  • Register
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • My Cart
Anticancer Research

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Archive
  • Info for
    • Authors
    • Editorial Policies
    • Subscribers
    • Advertisers
    • Editorial Board
    • Special Issues
  • Journal Metrics
  • Other Publications
    • In Vivo
    • Cancer Genomics & Proteomics
    • Cancer Diagnosis & Prognosis
  • More
    • IIAR
    • Conferences
    • 2008 Nobel Laureates
  • About Us
    • General Policy
    • Contact
  • Visit us on Facebook
  • Follow us on Linkedin
Research ArticleClinical Studies

Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Urine Cytology in Low-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer

KEIJIRO KIYOSHIMA, MASAKAZU AKITAKE, MASAKI SHIOTA, ARIO TAKEUCHI, RYOSUKE TAKAHASHI, JUNICHI INOKUCHI, KATSUNORI TATSUGAMI, AKIRA YOKOMIZO and MASATOSHI ETO
Anticancer Research February 2016, 36 (2) 799-802;
KEIJIRO KIYOSHIMA
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAKAZU AKITAKE
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
MASAKI SHIOTA
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
ARIO TAKEUCHI
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
RYOSUKE TAKAHASHI
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
JUNICHI INOKUCHI
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
KATSUNORI TATSUGAMI
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
AKIRA YOKOMIZO
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: yokoa{at}uro.med.kyushu-u.ac.jp
MASATOSHI ETO
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Aim: To examine the clinical significance of preoperative urine cytology in patients with low-grade bladder cancer. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively investigated the records of 155 patients diagnosed with primary low-grade (Ta) urothelial carcinoma of the bladder between January 2000 and September 2014. Results: Patients with class III or greater cytology had significantly higher-grade (G2) (p=0.01), larger tumors (≥15 mm, p=0.0009) and significantly shorter recurrence-free survival compared to patients with class II or lower cytology (p<0.0001). However, Cox proportional hazards analysis for recurrence-free survival only identified tumor size (≥15 mm) (hazard ratio=5.97, 95% confidence interval=2.39–17.29; p<0.0001) as a predictor of poor prognosis, although patients with class III or higher preoperative cytology showed a tendency towards frequent intravesical recurrence (hazard ratio=1.98, 95% confidence interval=0.96-4.2; p=0.063). Conclusion: Preoperative urine cytology, in addition to tumor size, might be a useful predictor of intravesical recurrence of bladder cancer.

  • Urine cytology
  • bladder cancer
  • low-grade urothelial carcinoma

Non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) has a high incidence of recurrence. The recurrence rate in a large cohort of patients with NMIBC was 47.8%, based on a median follow-up of 3.9 years, with a median time to first recurrence of 2.7 years (1). Routine, long-term surveillance is therefore necessary to detect recurrence in patients with bladder cancer (BC).

Urine cytology is an important, non-invasive diagnostic procedure for detecting urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder. It is also used to detect recurrence after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) or intravesical instillation therapy with chemotherapeutic agents or bacillus Calmette–Guerin in patients with NMIBC. Positive urine cytology generally indicates high-grade UC, such as invasive carcinoma and carcinoma in situ, which have severe cytological atypia (2). In contrast, few patients with low-grade UC demonstrate positive cytology. Although several studies have reported the sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology as a diagnostic marker in BC as a whole (3, 4), its clinical significance in patients with low-grade UC has rarely been reported (5).

In the current study, we investigated the clinical significance of preoperative urine cytology in patients with low-grade UC.

Patients and Methods

We reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 201 consecutive patients who underwent TURBT for primary BC from January 2000 to September 2014, and who were histologically diagnosed with low-grade (Ta) UC at Kyushu University Hospital. Patients with prior /concurrent history of upper urinary tract cancer (n=25), no records of preoperative urine cytology (n=9), no records of tumor number or size (n=6), or no follow-up data after TURBT (n=6) were excluded. A total of 155 patients were therefore included in the final analysis. Histological diagnoses were reviewed based on both the World Health Organization (WHO) classification 2004 (6) and WHO classification 1973 (7). Diagnoses of urine cytology were made according to the Papanicolaou classification system (8).

The relationships between preoperative urine cytology and clinicopathological characteristics including histological grade, tumor size, and tumor number were analyzed. The relationships between urine cytology and clinical outcome in terms of recurrence-free (RFS) and progression-free (PFS) survival were also examined. Tumor recurrence was defined as the identification of a new tumor in the bladder, confirmed by histological examination of consequent TURBT. Tumor progression was defined as intravesical recurrence with confirmed histological muscle invasion or detectable distant metastases.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Clinical characteristics of participating patients.

Statistical analyses were performed with JMP Pro version 11 (SAS Institute, Tokyo, Japan). Actuarial RFS and PFS were calculated by Kaplan–Meier analysis, and univariate comparisons between groups were assessed by log-rank tests. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model to identify the variables that predicted prognostic outcomes. Values of p<0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

Results

The median age of the patients was 70 years [interquartile range (IQR)=62-75 years] and the median follow-up after TURBT was 30 (IQR=23-68) months. The median size (maximum diameter) of the largest tumor was 15 mm (IQR=10-20 mm). The diagnosis of preoperative urine cytology was class III or less in the majority of patients (130/155, 83.9%). All bladder tumors were histologically diagnosed as low grade according to the 2004 WHO classification, and 129 (83%) were G2, according to the 1973 WHO classification. All the patients underwent complete tumor resection, and 86 patients (55%) were treated with postoperative intravesical chemotherapy. Intravesical recurrence was observed in 36 patients (23%), and one patient (0.6%) experienced progression to muscle-invasive disease (Table I).

Regarding the relationships between preoperative urine cytology and clinicopathological characteristics, patients with class III or higher cytology had significantly higher-grade (G2) (p=0.01) and larger tumors (cut-off value 15 mm, p=0.0009; cut-off value 30 mm, p=0.002), and were significantly older (p=0.048). Similarly, patients with class IV/V cytology had significantly larger tumors (cut-off value 15 mm, p=0.0009; cut-off value 30 mm, p=0.003). There were no significant correlations between any other analyzed features, such as tumor number and sex, and preoperative urine cytology (Table II).

Figure 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1.

Relationships between recurrence-free survival and preoperative urine cytology. A: Patients with class III or higher cytology more frequently experienced recurrence than did patients with class I or II cytology (p=0.008). B: There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between patients with class IV or higher cytology and patients with class III or lower cytology (p=0.28). TURBT, Transurethral resection of bladder tumor.

Univariate analysis for RFS showed that patients with class III or higher preoperative urine cytology had a significantly shorter RFS compared with patients with class II or lower cytology (p=0.008) (Figure 1A). There was no significant difference in RFS between patients with class IV/V and those with class III or lower urine cytology (p= 0.28) (Figure 1B).

Multivariate analysis of tumor size (≥15 mm), tumor number, preoperative urine cytology (≥class III), histological grade (including G2 element) and postoperative intravesical chemotherapy using a Cox proportional hazards model for RFS identified only tumor size (≥15 mm) (p<0.0001) as an independent predictor of poor prognosis. Although preoperative cytology class III or higher tended to be associated with poor prognosis, the result was not significant (p=0.06) (Table III).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table II.

Relationships between preoperative urine cytology and clinicopathological features of bladder cancer.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table III.

Univariate and multivariate analyses for intravesical recurrence of bladder cancer.

Discussion

Urine cytology is a non-invasive procedure performed as part of the essential screening and follow-up examinations in patients with BC (1, 3-5). Cytological diagnosis depends mainly on cytological atypia, and patients with high-grade carcinomas, such as muscle-invasive UC or carcinoma in situ, thus frequently have positive cytology, while patients with low-grade UC rarely do. Cytological diagnosis for BC generally has a high specificity and low sensitivity, and a systematic review reported a specificity of 94% [95% confidence interval (CI)=90-96%] and sensitivity of 55% (95% CI=48-62%) (3). The sensitivity depends on the histological grade, which accounts for the difference in sensitivities between high-grade (≥70%) and low-grade (30-40%) UC (9-12).

These previous results suggest that urine cytology provides less valuable clinical information in patients with low-grade UC. However, although numerous reports have described the clinical characteristics of urine cytology in bladder UC overall, few have addressed its significance in patients with low-grade UC. In the current study, we therefore examined the relationships between preoperative urine cytology and clinicopathological features in 155 patients with primary low-grade UC, and showed that urine cytology of class III or higher was significantly correlated with higher grade (containing G2 element) and larger size (≥15 mm) in low-grade UCs. These results thus depend on both the cytological grade and number of carcinoma cells in the urine.

Regarding the relationship between urine cytology and prognosis, 36 patients (23%) experienced intravesical recurrence and one patient showed progression to muscle-invasive disease during the median 30-month follow-up period. Although univariate analysis identified a tumor size 15 mm or more (p<0.0001) and cytology class III or higher (p=0.008) as being significantly correlated with intravesical recurrence, multivariate analysis only identified a correlation with tumor size ≥15 mm [hazard ratio (HR)=5.8, 95% CI=2.4-17.3; p<0.0001). Meanwhile, preoperative cytology of class III or higher tended to be associated with frequent intravesical recurrence (HR=1.98, 95% CI=0.96-4.2; p=0.063). However, cytology of class IV or higher showed no significant correlation with intravesical recurrence. These results indicate that preoperative urine cytology of class III or higher might predict a higher risk of intravesical recurrence, even in patients with low-grade UCs. Only 25 (16%) patients in the current study demonstrated preoperative cytology of class IV or higher, which may have contributed to the apparent lack of any significant correlation with intravesical recurrence.

Jackson et al. reported the relationships between preoperative urine cytology, classified as positive, suspicious, atypical or negative, and clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes in 87 patients with low-grade UCs (5). In the current study, we classified urine cytology according to the Papanicolaou classification (13), and considered that class I/II, class III, and class IV/V were equivalent to negative, atypical, and suspicious/positive, respectively, in the study by Jackson et al. Jackson et al. reported that patients with positive/suspicious cytology experienced significantly more frequent progression to high-grade UC compared with those with atypical/negative cytology (p=0.009), but found no correlation between cytology and intravesical recurrence (p=0.11). In the current study, we were unable to analyze the correlation between cytology and progression to high-grade UC because only two patients showed progression, while 36 patients experienced intravesical recurrence. However, patients with class III or higher cytology had a poorer prognosis in terms of intravesical recurrence according to the univariate analysis. This apparent discrepancy may be attributable to the different diagnostic classifications used and different cohorts studied. However, despite the limitations of being retrospective studies with relatively small sample sizes, both the current study and the one of Jackson et al. (5) highlight the possible clinical significance of urine cytology in patients with low-grade UC.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund (H24-A-4) and by a Grant-in-Aid for Clinical Cancer Research (H22-Clinical Cancer-026, Project ID: 1010387) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan.

  • Received November 15, 2015.
  • Revision received December 9, 2015.
  • Accepted December 14, 2015.
  • Copyright© 2016 International Institute of Anticancer Research (Dr. John G. Delinassios), All rights reserved

References

  1. ↵
    1. Sylvester RJ,
    2. van der Meijden AP,
    3. Oosterlinck W,
    4. Witjes JA,
    5. Bouffioux C,
    6. Denis L,
    7. Newling DW,
    8. Kurth K
    : Predicting recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of 2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 49: 466-477, 2006.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Babjuk M,
    2. Böhle A,
    3. Burger M,
    4. Compérat E,
    5. Kaasinen E,
    6. Palou J,
    7. Rouprêt M,
    8. van Rhijn BWG,
    9. Shariat S,
    10. Sylvester R,
    11. Zigeuner R
    : Guidelines on non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (Ta, T1 and CIS), European Association of Urology 2015, European Association of Urology, Arnhem, the Netherlands.
  3. ↵
    1. Glas AS,
    2. Roos D,
    3. Deutekom M,
    4. Zwinderman AH,
    5. Bossuyt PM,
    6. Kurth KH
    : Tumor markers in the diagnosis of primary bladder cancer. A systematic review. J Urol 169: 1975-1982, 2003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Flezar MS
    : Urine and bladder washing cytology for detection of urothelial carcinoma: standard test with new possibilities. Radiol Oncol 44: 207-214, 2010.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Jackson J,
    2. Barkan GA,
    3. Kapur U,
    4. Wojcik EM
    : Cytologic and cystoscopic predictors of recurrence and progression in patients with low-grade urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol 121: 398-402, 2013.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Eble JN,
    2. Sauter G,
    3. Epstein JI,
    4. Sesterhenn IA
    : World Health Organization Classification of Tumours. Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs. IARC Press, Lyon, 2004.
  7. ↵
    1. Mostofi FK,
    2. Sobin LH,
    3. Torloni H
    : Histological Typing of Urinary Bladder Tumours. International Classification of Tumours 10. World Health Organization, Geneva, 1973.
  8. ↵
    1. Papanicolaou GN
    : Cytology of the urine sediment in neoplasms of the urinary tract. J Urol 57: 375-379, 1947.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Koss LG,
    2. Melamed MR
    1. Koss LG
    : Tumors of the urinary tract in urine and brushings. In: Koss LG, Melamed MR (ed) Koss's diagnostic cytology and its histopathologic bases. 5th edn, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp. 777-846, 2006.
    1. Bastacky S,
    2. Ibrahim S,
    3. Wilczynski SP,
    4. Murphy WM
    : The accuracy of urinary cytology in daily practice. Cancer 87: 118-128, 1999.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Curry JL,
    2. Wojcik EM
    : The effect of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasms classification system on urine cytology results. Cancer 96: 140-145, 2002.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Ross JS,
    2. Cohen MB
    : Ancillary methods for the detection of recurrent urothelial neoplasia. Cancer 90: 75-86, 2000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Owens CL,
    2. VandenBussche CJ,
    3. Burroughs FH,
    4. Rosenthal DL
    : A review of reporting systems and terminology for urine cytology. Cancer Cytopathol 121: 9-14, 2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

Anticancer Research
Vol. 36, Issue 2
February 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Ed Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on Anticancer Research.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Urine Cytology in Low-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
(Your Name) has sent you a message from Anticancer Research
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the Anticancer Research web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
3 + 16 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
Citation Tools
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Urine Cytology in Low-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
KEIJIRO KIYOSHIMA, MASAKAZU AKITAKE, MASAKI SHIOTA, ARIO TAKEUCHI, RYOSUKE TAKAHASHI, JUNICHI INOKUCHI, KATSUNORI TATSUGAMI, AKIRA YOKOMIZO, MASATOSHI ETO
Anticancer Research Feb 2016, 36 (2) 799-802;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Reprints and Permissions
Share
Prognostic Significance of Preoperative Urine Cytology in Low-grade Non-muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer
KEIJIRO KIYOSHIMA, MASAKAZU AKITAKE, MASAKI SHIOTA, ARIO TAKEUCHI, RYOSUKE TAKAHASHI, JUNICHI INOKUCHI, KATSUNORI TATSUGAMI, AKIRA YOKOMIZO, MASATOSHI ETO
Anticancer Research Feb 2016, 36 (2) 799-802;
Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Patients and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgements
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

  • Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: A Single-institutional Experience With Emphasis on Diagnostic Yield of High-grade Urothelial Carcinoma and Low-grade Urothelial Neoplasm
  • Google Scholar

More in this TOC Section

  • Whole-liver Palliative Radiotherapy Using SIB for Diffuse Liver Metastases: 3D-CRT versus 99mTc-GSA SPECT Image-guided VMAT
  • Real-world Analysis of Treatment Patterns, Clinical Outcomes, and Molecular Profiling in Advanced Biliary Tract Cancer
  • Post-progression Nutritional and Immune Status Determines Survival After First-line Chemotherapy in Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer
Show more Clinical Studies

Keywords

  • Urine cytology
  • Bladder cancer
  • low-grade urothelial carcinoma
Anticancer Research

© 2026 Anticancer Research

Powered by HighWire